Some notes on the AL West with an update on a potential Hall of Famer and another take on the Vernon Wells trade…
- Rangers president Nolan Ryan told the Dallas Morning News that he hasn't ruled out bringing Vladimir Guerrero back. Ryan likes the idea of adding another powerful bat, but suggests Vlad may seek more playing time elsewhere.
- Richard Durrett of ESPNDallas.com examines this prediction of Ryan's: Texas will win 90-95 regular season games in 2011.
- Dave Cameron of FanGraphs wonders if the Vernon Wells trade is, at least from the Angels' perspective, the most inexplicable deal in recent history.
- The Mariners, who select second in this June's draft, will consider amateur players including Anthony Rendon, Gerrit Cole, Matt Purke and George Springer, according to MLB.com's Greg Johns.
monkeyspanked
It just feels bad to be an Angel fan right now. Probably how it’s felt most of Angel’s existence. (except ’02-’09)
Move over Pirates. There’s a new pathetic kid on the block.
junior ballbag
I wouldn’t go that far.
Ethan Hollenback
Because the angels spent over what a player was worth to bring in a good player? I can agree with most teams would not of made the same move but I do not see the pirates bringing in good players. The angels will be a much tougher team then the pirates. With their rotation I can see them making a playoff push in the west. It will come down to what angels to we see. The 2009 version with everyone batting .300+ or the 2010 version where literally everyone had an offseaon.
John Stefan
Heck, even the Pirates have overpaid for players. Ryan Doumit’s contract is horrendous, and more recently they signed Lyle Overbay (past his prime and useless) and Kevin Correia (good stats at Petco and AT&T, otherwise below average SP) for way more than they are worth!
Mark H
Sign Vlad Orioles!
TwinsVet
Here’s what makes the Wells trade stand out above all others as historically inexplicable:
IT IS QUANTIFIABLE IN THE PRESENT.
Napoli and Rivera aren’t merely prospects. They have established track records and their production is reasonably predictable. The same goes for Wells. We’re not talking a “Colon for Phillips-Lee-Sizemore” deal, because in that case, a GM can reasonably say, “Oops, didn’t really realize the talent we had there”.
Toronto knew exactly what they were getting, and how much it would cost them over the coming years. Anaheim knew exactly what they were getting and giving up, and how much it would cost them over the coming years. Most other bad deals you see are a case wherein one of the teams did not realize AT THE TIME what they were giving up or getting.
All the cards are fully on the table in this deal. And Anaheim still pulled the trigger. Inexcusable.
Mark S
Even if we’re living in a vacuum where money is infinite, you could still make a case that Napoli has more value than Wells by himself.
Ethan Hollenback
Its kind of like how you can make a case that Wells has more value then Napoli and Rivera.
bjsguess
You hit the nail on the head.
In the other deals cited by Cameron they involved prospects. It is inherent that dealing away any prospect, no matter how good they may look, is a fairly risky proposal. In this case you are dealing away 2 established ML players for 1 established ML player. There is very little that we don’t know about any of the three players.
The Angels have to hope and pray that Wells stays healthy AND plays at his 2010 levels. Odds of that happening are about 10%. It was an idiotic trade anyway you look at it. Especially when you consider that they passed on Crawford and Beltre for financial reasons. Horrible, horrible trade.
I hope Moreno is reading what EVERYBODY is saying about this deal. Reagins should be fired today – along with his front-office staff that suggested that this was some sort of a good deal. I’m still in shock over this as an Angels fan.
Ethan Hollenback
I wouldn’t worry to much about the trade. The Angels are better off with it. Fact is Napoli and Juan Rivera were getting pinched out of the Angels lineup with the return of Morales. Their production was due to drop off and not be a large enough presence in the Angels lineup. By picking up Wells if he stays healthy he will provide more production for the Angels as players on the bench can easily match the production of Juan Rivera.
FrankTheFunkasaurusRex
one analogy i like.
Anthopoulos shows Reagins his hand: pair of Aces
Reagins’ hand: pair of 2s
Reigins: I’m all in
TwinsVet
Ha. Love it.
Greg Flowers
nap is arb elligable for 2 more years =15 mil, rivera 5.25 mil slash 86 mil (Wells).. u get Wells for 64 mil for 4 years=16 mil a year. not that bad,,CONSIDERING ARTE doesnt give a F..about $$$$ now…
bjsguess
Your math (and thinking) is off …
Napoli won’t earn $15m over his 2 arb years. His max this year is $6m. Might end up at $5m. An estimate of $13m is a little more reasonable (unless Napoli totally goes off and it makes this trade look even worse).
The bigger issue is that Moreno does give an F about money since he clearly used that as an excuse to skip on Crawford and Beltre. And he certainly will give an F about money with a payroll sitting at $150m, a team that can win maybe 85 games, and Weaver/Morales coming up on FA. Unless Moreno is going to jack payroll into the Red Sox/Phillies/Yankees stratosphere the Angels will be hamstrung severely by this deal. I think it’s fair to say that the next 4 years are looking more and more like sustained mediocrity.
$1529282
Wells at 4/64 would be awful, even if that were an accurate comparison, which it’s not.
You’re assuming Napoli and Rivera will be essentially worthless, but the fact remains that, offensively speaking, Napoli could very likely put together two BETTER seasons for a fraction of the price, especially with him moving to homer-happy Toronto and Wells moving to Angel Stadium. Paying $23M a season for a below-average “center fielder” (I use that term lightly for Wells’ defense) when you could be paying $5M-$7M for a plus offensive catcher instead makes zero sense.
The Angels took someone with positive trade value (Napoli) and packaged him for the player with the most negative trade value in all of baseball.
mkorpal
“The Mariners, who select second in this June’s draft, will consider amateur players”
Wow, glad the Mariners aren’t looking at established MLB players in the draft/sarcasm.
yazpik
Yeah, maybe they can consider selecting Albert Pujols, haha…
Green_Monster
I heard they were coming out with a second Pujols.
David
maybe they can get tim lincecum this time
CrustyJuggler
Yeah. Big shocker there. So the Mariners ARE going to be looking at drafting a top amateur with the #2 overall pick then? Breaking news, that.
CrustyJuggler
Yeah. Big shocker there. So the Mariners ARE going to be looking at drafting a top amateur with the #2 overall pick then? Breaking news, that.
drwheelock
What I LOVE about this is that according to a LA salary report that was published last weekend on MLBTR … this move will push the Angels payroll to the $145M mark for 2011 after all the arbitration figures are finalized…YIKES. YET they will be 3rd in the AL West.
Yes Seattle is rebuilding their farm system, while waiting until after 2011 for Bavasi’s final horrible contracts to fall off. But nothing is worse than paying your players $145M for a 3rd place team, especially in the AL West!
Vernon Wells average WAR for the last three years: 1.8
Juan Rivera’s average WAR for the last three years: 1.1
Mike Napoli’s average WAR for the last three years: 2.7
And now the Angels turn almost full time to Jeff Mathis behind the dish…And Angel fans don’t even want to look at his WAR in comparison to Napoli’s!
I love this quote (for all you Angel lovers) from MLBTR: “Wells presumably takes over in center field for L.A. now that Torii Hunter has been shifted to right, though Hunter (-6.2 UZR/150) was a bit better than Wells (-7.0 UZR/150) in center last season. Wells’ defense did improve last year, however, and the former three-time Gold Glover could approach his old form playing on natural grass at Angel Stadium. The Angels could also explore putting Wells in left and give Peter Bourjos for the bulk of playing time in center.”
I’ve heard some Angel fan comment about how the OF defense is going to be the best in MLB. Don’t be so sure that Bourjas is the one playing in CF come April! He could be their bench player instead, and if that is the case the Angels have a very VERY OLD outfield with UZR issues.
Lunchbox45
but Vernon Wells hustles, and donates a lot of time and money to charity.. Karma will just make the wind push the ball right in to his glove in center. .
Alex M
All the Angels press releases indicate Wells is taking over in LF, like everyone thought.
baseballz
I really don’t see how Springer is in the draft picture for the Mariners. Cole or Purke, anything else would be a loss – if the draft was held today of course.
YanksFanSince78
Probably because he had an amazing cape cod season. If you’re one of those “5 Tool” seekers then he would be your guy. Several guys have him among the top 3-4 picks so it’s not a stretch, especially since Cole and others are probably repped by Boras.
Matter of fact. Does anyone know where I can find a list of player agents and who they rep in this years draft class?
YanksFanSince78
Let me clarify what I said:
Vernon Wells is a suck-ish kind of player. I am not defedening per se. What I am saying is that the proof negates your contention that his career numbers are a factor of the ballpark. I like using OPS but let’s use ISO since that’s what you choose.
Years where his Home ISO was MUCH greater than his Road ISO (+50):
2010, 2006, 2004
Years where his Road ISO was greater than his Home ISO:
2009, 2003, 2002
Years where his Home and Road ISO were w/in +30 point of each other:
2008, 2007, 2005
Wells is one of the most inconsistent players in baseball which is one reason his contract has been soooooo bad. He’s had years where, OBP aside, you can sort of understand why ppl view him as a good player (because they look at HR, RBI) and then there are some years he just doesn’t even deserve $8 mil per year.
I am not defending him, but I wouldn’t say that he is a complete jeckle and hyde home/away. His H/R splits are as sporadic as he is. Still, bad….bad…bad trade.
clownydaggersyall
I love how baseball has become the accountants sport… this player makes blah blah blah i could care less about how much they want to overpay a player. Then again I should have expected as much from a sport that has things like Hot Stove Fantasy Leagues. I’m not saying the deal is great for the Angels, but they replaced one of the worst ballplayers Ive ever seen with a better one – if the organization loses money on the deal, oh well. While were at it – just about EVERY player in the majors is overpaid, and it gets worse every year.
FrankTheFunkasaurusRex
Then the Angels should have overpaid for Crawford, Beltre, Lee, Soriano, Dunn, and every other free agent available, since everyplayer HAS to be overpaid.
btw the best part is that Reagin’s justification for not getting Crawford was because of how expensive he was. LOL
clownydaggersyall
no i completely agree.. i just find it amusing that 90% of the posts on a site dedicated to baseball are about the financial terms of free agent signings… i just think the whole hot stove thing is a bit overblown.
FrankTheFunkasaurusRex
but economics have been part of baseball for forever. Its stupid to not look at the financial side of things. When you ignore finances, Vernon Wells is a pretty decent player. But in real life, no GM would touch him with a ten foot pole
FrankTheFunkasaurusRex
seriously though, I love Wells. He’s a decent player, a great guy, and very giving to the community.
.
.
.
BUT I’M SO GLAD HE’S GONE
Fred Draper
As a Jays fan, here’s a familiar sight I won’t miss and Angels’ fans should get used to: Vernon picking up a ball on the warning track and lobbing back to the cutoff man.
Or… as a Rays wag stated after Fred Lewis caught a well hit ball in the power alley last year in Tampa: “It’s official: Toronto outfielders can actually catch a ball”