The Pirates have called right-handed pitching prospect Braxton Ashcraft up to the majors and sent right-hander Isaac Mattson to Triple-A, manager Don Kelly told reporters (including MLB.com’s Alex Stumpf). No further transaction was required since Ashcraft has been on the Bucs’ 40-man roster since November 2023. Noah Hiles of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported yesterday that Ashcraft would be traveling with the Pirates on their current road trip to Arizona, though it wasn’t clear if Ashcraft would be officially activated or if he would just be part of the team’s taxi squad.
As it turns out, Ashcraft will indeed get his first taste of Major League action, and he’ll also be operating in a new role. Ashcraft has started 69 of his 71 career games in the minors, but Kelly said that Ashcraft will for now work as a long reliever or bulk pitcher on Pittsburgh’s staff. This would seem to indicate that Mike Burrows will remain as the Pirates’ fifth starter behind the stable top four of Paul Skenes, Mitch Keller, Andrew Heaney, and Bailey Falter. Burrows was only just called up within the last week to replace Carmen Mlodzinski, who struggled over nine starts.
Pittsburgh fans may continue to raise eyebrows over the fact that Bubba Chandler has yet to be recalled for his MLB debut, as the Bucs have thus far turned to Burrows (whose lone career big league game came in 2024), plus two other pitchers (Tom Harrington and now Ashcraft) who hadn’t yet appeared in the Show. While Chandler is one of the sport’s best overall prospects, the pitching-rich Pirates seem more willing for now to give looks to some of their other well-regarded young arms.
Ashcraft has been waiting a while for the call to the majors, as he was a second-round pick for the Pirates back in the 2018 draft. Multiple injuries (including a Tommy John surgery in 2021) slowed his progress, and Ashcraft has logged only 283 1/3 innings over parts of six pro seasons. The Bucs still felt confident enough in his potential to add Ashcraft to their 40-man roster in advance of the 2023 Rule 5 Draft, and he went on to post good numbers across two levels in 2024, even with forearm inflammation again limiting his time on the mound.
Over 48 1/3 innings at Triple-A this season, Ashcraft has a 5.03 ERA, though a .361 BABIP has contributed to that inflated number. Ashcraft’s 51.1% grounder rate, 25.6% strikeout rate, and 8.7% walk rate paint a better picture of his performance, even if his control has dipped a bit in comparison to his last couple of post-surgery seasons.
Baseball America ranks the righty as the fourth-best minor leaguer in the Pirates’ farm system, while MLB Pipeline has him seventh on their Bucs top 30 list. Both scouting reports wonder if Ashcraft may be best suited to relief pitching, given both his injury history his lack of a strong or consistent changeup. Ashcraft has a plus fastball in the 95-98mph range, and his slider and curveball are also intriguing enough to make the right-hander a potential three-pitch threat.
Since Pittsburgh’s rotation is fairly full at the moment and Chandler’s debut is looming, Ashcraft’s bullpen role will allow him to get his foot in the door at the MLB level, and perhaps also hint at his eventual future. Obviously the Pirates will still give Ashcraft some looks as a starter down the road before committing one way or the other to his future deployment, and for now, Ashcraft will get the opportunity to help out the Pirates’ inconsistent pen.
Pirates at this point just making non Chandler pitching transaction to troll their fanbase
Absolutely. We need to rush guys up to save the season!
Because it’s worked so well with Henry Davis…
What do you mean rush? Chandler is dominating. Might as well give the fans something to show up for. What a trash pile the owners put out there on a daily basis. Should be embarrassed. The fans deserve better
They should keep him in the minors until the 1 hitters turn into no hitters I guess. THEN he will be ready
The fans?
The fans don’t show up to support the team even when it is one of the best in baseball.
2015: Went to the playoffs for the 3rd straight year and won 98 games. Attendance was ninth of fifteen NL teams, even behind the Brewers who had a record of 68-94.
1990s: Failed to sell-out National League Championship Series games.
1979: Won the World Series. Attendance was tenth of the 12 NL teams.
Pittsburgh is an historically bad market for baseball.
That is just false. They are no different than any fan base that increases when better players. For example when Skenes pitches park is crowded. Obviously will have lower attendance than big markets because of much lower population. Stop being that person.
So sad to see this reply yet again after again and again. All these claims are factually inaccurate. Over and over again gibberish. Pirates outsold tickets for Braves in 90’s NLCS. .
I posted what attendance was when the team was one of the best in baseball – 2015, early 1990s, 1979.
Even when they were one of the best teams in baseball attendance was not good.
In 2015, they won 98 games and went to the playoffs for the third straight year. The Brewers lost 94 games and had a higher attendance than the Pirates – and Milwaukee is not a big market.
It doesn’t matter why Pittsburgh is a bad market. The fact is they don’t draw and that is why revenues are low, which necessitates low payrolls.
They failed to sell out NLCS games in 90s.
They were 9th of 15 NL teams in attendance in 2015 when they won 98 games and went to the playoffs for the third straight year. Even the Brewers, with a record of 68-94, drew more fans to their games.
The Pirates won the World Series in 1979 and were TENTH of TWELVE NL teams in attendance.
That is an historically bad market for baseball.
Not true. Some of Skenes starts had small attendance. The ones that did have good attendance were because of fireworks or bobbleheads
You’re not fooling anyone Bob. We know this is you
I have some numbers for you.
Revenue sharing: +$118MM
TV Revenue sharing: +$90MM
Pirates Concessions and Tickets: +$90MM
Pirates Payroll: -$85MM
Pirates Minors Payroll: -$25MM (roughly)
So that means the Pirates get $298MM and spend $120MM. Maybe fans showing up isn’t the reason Nutting won’t put money into the team…
Think about this:
If the Pirates gave out the same contracts to Machado, Judge, and Otani; they would still be profitable.
A detailed four-month-long investigation found that the Pirates lost money in 2024 and that Bob Nutting did NOT make a profit.
dkpittsburghsports.com/team/site-stuff/feed?page=0…
In 2023, the Pirates ranked 26th in MLB in revenues – even with revenue sharing money included.
From the article you posted:
“All other costs, including administration, staff, travel, development, draft, international, stadium ops, analytics and way more: $171.7 million”
I know fiance, sounds like a bunch of hogwash moving money to look like a loss. Big business do this all the time due to loopholes. It is a lie. If I pay my brother and sisters $500k to be “analytical advisors” and post a loss, I didn’t really lose money, I just laundered out to family.
Your other point is also moot. It doesn’t matter if the Pirates ranked 26th in revenue. All MLB teams are pulling in piles of cash of revenue. The Pirates (Rays and Marlins) don’t spend it. The make up phony math to make themselves look poor.
If Nutting was losing money, he would fully open his finances for the Pirates and show everyone. He doesn’t.
Orioles and pirates just need to combine teams
@AAAA – While it’s incredible that the Pirates receive over $200M in revenue sharing funds, there are so many more expenses than payroll to consider. First off, benefits alone tend to cost each team around $15M per year. Then they have to pay the salaries of the park employees, ticket sales, security, police, etc. (Vendor salaries & expenses should be paid by the outsourced concessions company).
Between the amateur draft and international free agency, another $20M+ is spent on draft bonuses and signing bonuses. Then there are utility bills for the park, real estate taxes, team travel expenses, and of course front office salaries too. Most teams have some sort of debt service they need to pay down as well. All of these “other” expenses will exceed team payroll expenses when you total them up and in the Pirates case, they could easily be 2X their salary expenses since they only spend $85M for MLB salaries.
Even with all the revenue sharing income, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Pirates are clearing less than $20M per season when it’s all said and done.
Common Pirates posters now realize that Richard is just a troll who deserves to be ignored.
That would be a pretty good team but it would have no manager.
But the Pirates receive $200+MM in revenue sharing BEFORE you account for the 52% they don’t share. They likely make around $300MM in revenue. Even if the total cost of taxes, fees, and all “other” combined was 2x the player salaries ($85MM), that is still around $45MM in profit.
That said, unless there is a money laundering scheme happening, there is no way they pay $170MM in “other” costs. I would bet the number is closer to $80-100MM.
The Reds and Brewers are in a similar market size and they can spend money.
There is no excuse. Bob can spend the money or he can move the team. They won’t be seeing another dollar out of me.
If you’re citing DK Sports, your argument is invalid.
In the 80s, before Barry Bonds, the Pirates didn’t draw, that is a fact-for a variety of reasons. Don’t know what capacity is at PNC Park relative to other parks. It’s hard to blame fans, since they have only had 4 seasons of winning baseball since Bonds left in 1993! They have squandered several generations of fans.
MLB as a whole needs to contract. Start with those two teams in Florida. No disrespect to fans of those teams.
Factually inaccurate yet again. Bizarre.
“The Pittsburgh Pirates, according to information received by the players union and confirmed by several owners, are one of the most profitable teams in all of baseball
si.com/mlb/pirates/news/pittsburgh-pirates-rank-on…
Richard Jarzynka—most people can’t even remember when the pirates were “one of the best in baseball.”
In almost every season until the last couple of years, their viewership was among the top 2-3 in MLB. We root, but we just don’t pay to attend. Longtime GM Joe L. Brown was right in the 1960s. The Pirates first televised home game wasn’t until 1970, when they opened Three Rivers Stadium. Brown was against televising home games because he believed that nobody will buy tickets when they can get it for free.
And name another team in any sport that could go 44 years without winning a league title and still have people interested.
To Never Remember—Skenes no longer is a draw—check the home attendance when he pitches—the only time the park was crowded was on his. Bobblehead day.
You think promoting lesser players like Ashcraft makes more sense?
Chandler will be up as soon as the super 2 date passes. Whatever that is that’s when he will be called up. Because…..Pirates gotta pirate……..
Hopefully he wins rookie of the year and they get double effed
if they wait till the super 2 date passes, their will not ve enough time to win rookie of the year.
That’s what they thought last year.
I don’t think referring to Ashcraft as a “lesser player” is fair. He’s a quality prospect who very well could be a rotation stalwart for years to come. I don’t see the reason to rush Chandler– it’s not like the Pirates have a chance this season. Results aside, Chandler is still improving start after start, as well. It’s not like he’s 24 and has been killing AAA for over a year. Should he be up? Yes. But why bother forcing it? They’re playing for nothing.
Cards-They did not want to lose a year to Bubba like they did with Skenes or have him a super two.
They are limiting his pitches evidently because he is only averaging 4 innings per start.
Smart small market teams are aware of those limitations.
Anyway,this year is shot.Why would they bring him up?
Skenes and Chandler are way different prospects.
Anyone who follows the Pirates knows that.
Chandler should have already been up. Service time manipulation is the only reason he isn’t.
I don’t believe that. Henry was doing everything he needed to in the minors. I feel like some guys just got it or they don’t and you seem to find out early. Try them for a bit, make adjustments, if it doesn’t work out, move on. It’s hard when guys have potential but I don’t believe in guys playing seasons in AAA with washed up vets just to get in work.
Henry was slapped with a 1,1 designation. He’s not a first overall talent and shouldnt be treated as such. Before that draft, Jobe was considered the best player, and the Pirates went in a different direction with Davis.
@Bucsfan…and those that remember should know that Chandler probably wouldn’t be a Pirate at all if not for the cost savings of taking Davis 1.1. Neither would Solometo, another (well…used to be until last season) fairly highly regarded prospect. Everybody slamming Cherington for drafting Davis should remember this. This was exactly his plan all along.
Yeah, Cherington is a real wizard, running laps mentally around the other GMs. Bottom line – If they draft a player, he’ll likely sign. Chandler included… a few hundred thousand isnt worth waiting another year.
Bring up the Bubs!
Chandler might be pitching really well but his arm isn’t stretched out enough worthy of a call up. Look it up.
We need HITTING!! Everything being done A
…..ss backwards! Plain stupid, can’t win not scoring.
Which hitters should they promote from AAA?
Heard of trade or two?
Chandler pitched today, 6 no hit innings before giving up a hit in the 7th. Did walk 4
Pirates rank just above the Rockies in well run organizations.
I think that they got the Marlins and White Sox beat out too.
I’d add in the A’s as well.
Steinbrenner2728
A’s also may not have good ownership but they have better baseball people. Just watched them play the Phils and saw that they have some good young hitters and even recognized that Andujar is worth a contract that the Pirates failed to offer.
The Pirates have Skenes and Chandler along with a decent set of 3-6 type starters behind them. Can any of the White Sox, Marlins or Angels match that level of MLB talent? Nationals and A’s probably can. Rockies are just absolutely hopeless. Pirates will probably only get to a few wins over 500 for this window though because they have no hitting and won’t pay for it.
come on, they have Tommy Pham
The Pirates should NOT promote Bubba Chandler until they are sure that the Super 2 cutoff has passed.
Chandler is not going to get the Pirates to the playoffs this year – no matter how soon he is promoted – so they would be wise to wait and, thereby, save money in arbitration in two or three years.
Yeah they should save that money and put it towards all those free agents they plan on signing. Right???
That, and, because of the historically bad market in which they play, they lost money last year and ranked 26th in revenue in 2023.
Yeah that bad market sure hurt the Steelers and Penguins.
It’s an historically bad market for BASEBALL, which is not played by the Steelers and Penguins.
2015: Went to the playoffs for the 3rd straight year and won 98 games. Attendance was ninth of fifteen NL teams, even behind the Brewers who had a record of 68-94.
1990s: Failed to sell-out National League Championship Series games.
1979: Won the World Series. Attendance was tenth of the 12 NL teams.
@ King of Cards – You can’t compare NFL fan attendance with any of the other sports. All NFL teams draw huge crowds because there are only 8-9 home games per year (versus 41 in the NHL & 81 in MLB) and 90%+ of NFL games are on the weekend or on holidays.
While the Penguins do okay in Pittsburgh, they are in the bottom 10 annually for attendance and most likely revenue as well. Pittsburgh is a blue collar town and they do love their football, but there just aren’t enough people there with the disposal income to support an NHL team or a MLB team and be in the Top 5-10 in attendance. It’s too bad because PNC Park is probably the best baseball stadium in the country.
Dotty i disagree..i grew up not far from the burgh and can vividly recall when all 3 teams were actually good at the same time in the early 90s and all 3 sold out consistently..it has nothing to do with blue collar vs white collar money is green and we spend when there is something to see..same as everywhere..except florida lol
But not selling out playoff games in 1990 demonstrated that they have subpar fan support. This was during a time when only four teams made the playoffs, and the Pirates hadn’t been a playoff team since 1979. So playoff games were a rarity for them and most other teams, and they still couldn’t sell them out.
The Steelers are a totally different animal. Beloved and winning franchise with a national following. Penguins do OK, but probably would have folded or moved if Mario hadn’t saved the team (twice). Even the Panthers don’t do that great (some of that has to do with Penn State and their massive following all over the commonwealth).
But they might actually sell some tickets..the only thing people probably pay to see is Skenes…if this kid is that good they will be able capitalize on the ticket sales and marketing you think
The problem is this kid is being called up as a reliever right now. A long man in the bullpen is not going to help sell tickets. Now if they decide to start him and he does well in his first couple of starts then maybe he will help draw some extra fans like Skenes does and Bubba most likely will as well once he gets called up.
I was referring to chandler
With such a good pitching staff it’s a shame that about every single position player in the roster but Cruz is struggling to get on base.
not true
Frazier. did well during series against Milwaukee and though he didn’t hit a homer like Cruz did, he didn’t strike out 3 times either like Cruz did in yesterday’s game
Wow, he hit well during one series. I’ll take a homer with 3 Ks over a bunch of singles
you make it sound like Cruz is leading the league in batting. He’s been doing better lately and showing his raw power but he still strikes out too much and his defense needs some work
4 regulars other than Cruz get on base more than league average.
And that is why he should be batting third along with his home run capability.
The Pirates promoting Ashcraft instead of Chandler makes sense from a team, and IMO even a fan, perspective. They’re 19-35 and obviously not going anywhere this season because their offense isn’t very good. (.224/304/.331 with a .635 OPS, 2nd to last in HR, last in doubles and 24th in Ks.)
Yeah, bringing up Chandler would give Pirates fans two #1 starters to watch the rest of the year. But bringing him up with enough time to definitely win ROY just puts him a year of service time closer to getting traded or eventually walking as a free agent.
If the Pirates are lucky, Davis, Gonzales, Johnson, Griffin and Yorke all become good MLB players in the next couple years while Cruz, Hayes and Reynolds are still around *and* they have a pitching staff of Skenes, Chandler and Jones. Nutting’s never going to bring in a costly free agent. Although he may be willing to spend money to keep Cruz like he spent on Hayes. So all they’ve really got is hoping the young kids develop on roughly similar timelines.
Ashcraft was their 2nd rd. pick in 2018, He’s 25, so he’s not exactly a kid anymore. They need to see whether he’s at least potentially a 4th or 5th starter in 2026.
Lol come on man. Chandler is a better pitcher in every way possible.
*Nobody* is saying Chandler isn’t a better pitcher!
It would simply be utterly stupid to bring Chandler up when you’re 19-35 and have an offense incapable of beating most teams. All bringing up Chandler “accomplishes” is giving him a great opportunity to earn a year of service time, which *costs* the Pirates.
Small/mid market franchises need to control their best players for as long as the CBA allows, because when they get to free agency most of them aren’t staying. The only way a small/midmarket franchise is going to compete is to draft/develop well, and keep the prospects around long enough so that they all get to a point where they’re good and experienced enough for the MLB team to compete. You don’t cost yourself a year of service time from a likely #1 starter unless there’s a really good reason, and trying to save a 19-35 season is a *terrible* reason,
Excellent comment. Thank you.
Griffin likely won’t arrive until 2028. Davis Gonzales looking average and will need extended traded by time Griffin arrives. Yorke you hope can be average. None are SS. Not much of or even a upgrade over IKF Frazier.
Naval- Please do not bring logic into this thread.
Too many flunked that course in high school to understand it.
30 yrs ago homie. 30.
Ashcraft was always planned to be a reliever due to injury history. If his stuff plays up and he has that edge he could be super valuable as a middle man.
they should have sent Borucki down instead
He’s not been a lights out reliever lately
Bone head pitch calling! John Weiner couldn’t believe it,3 straight balls middle of plate? Bart calling this? Cost the game last night!
He should have shook him off then.
Henry calls a better game than Bart and has a stronger and accurate throwing arm than Bart. Too bad both suck at the plate.
Bart is mired in a slump and only has one homer.His power was supposed to be his strength
If Ashcraft succeeds immediately, given how many teams have shaky (at best) bullpens and will still think they’re playoff contenders, he may even be potential valuable trade piece at the deadline this year.
There’s no upside to being the worst team in MLB anymore because the #1 pick odds for the three worst teams are all 18.3%. But if you’re a team like the Pirates that’s already having a terrible year, if you can get another lottery pick I think you do it rather than cost yourself a year of service time from a kid like Chandler in an effort to “only” finish like 10 games under .500 at best.
The 2026 MLB draft is (allegedly) supposed to be better and deeper than this year’s draft too.
But you are assuming that the Pirates would properly develop that young player.
Well, there is that…
I’m not an owner, and won’t ever be rich enough to own a team in any sport. Nor have I studied the financials involved with running a MLB team, but I just don’t understand an owner who doesn’t properly invest in the franchise.
By invest, I don’t necessarily mean go try to sign a fantasy baseball team in free agency, because that usually doesn’t work. But, it seems like many of the MLB franchises that don’t win, the ownership doesn’t spend money on coaching, scouting, analytics, etc. throughout the organization like winning teams do. It’s shortsighted, because once you win, the $$$ usually grows the following year.
I also don’t understand owners like Nutting, who (reportedly) are content to pocket the revenue sharing $$ every year because winning would likely earn them *more* than the money they’re pocketing. They’re essentially getting “free money” from the rest of MLB and saying “This is cool. Nah, I don’t want to try to make more money than this.” What kind of “business person” thinks like that?
Agreed. He has no innings built up, wouldn’t work as a starter IMO. They badly need strong multi inning arms which are so crucial in today’s game. Mlodski could be one but they insist on having him start.
If he and Ashcraft can be bulk-late inning guys, we’d have to see less trash blowing games in the 7th and 8th. I hope he or Moreta can become a closer and they can trade Bednar or heck, even Santana, who may get something very good in return.
I apparently was born 40 years too early. When I played in AAA if you had a 5 ERA you got sent home. In today’s game you get sent to The Show! Nothing against this kid and I hope he does well. Sometimes all you need is an opportunity.
ERA is a bad statistic. It does not isolate on the pitcher’s individual performance, but is rather affected by things outside the pitcher’s control, such as fielding, official scoring, and the performance of relievers who replace the pitcher in the middle of an inning.
ERA is still a good statistic for starters,and long relievers with a lot of innings over a year.
It is often not representative for short relievers.
There are the multitudinous statistics now that can be used to get a clearer picture for them.
Maybe over a large sample size in the Major Leagues. Imo, ERA at Triple-A (or really any prospect) is pretty worthless unless it’s a huge outlier. You’re really looking at how a prospect looks, not how they perform. Right now, guys like Dietrich Ennis, Brandon Walter, are in the top ten of ERA at Triple-A. Plus, Ashcraft’s ERA of 5.03 really isn’t all that bad once you consider the league average in the International League is 4.61, the average WHIP is 1.44, and the average walk rate is about 11%.
And Ashcraft’s FIP was 4.15. That’s 46 points better than the International League average.
Yeah, some of these guys don’t even consider league context and park factors
Maybe that is why then that they brought him up.
But if they are good pitchers there should be no reason why their era is high unless they started out with a couple of awful games or have been hurt.
The parks may be conducive to hitting but any really good hitters get promoted to the ML’s pretty quickly unless they are not prospects.
Called it the DH,ban it please! Put back in beer league softball! Plus stupid rule of man on 2nd in 10th!!
Thankfully we don’t have to watch pitchers bunt anymore. Long live the DH!
Bunting on this team is almost nonexistent because they don’t teach basic fundamentals to their players.
A team that is starving for runs, the fact they don’t bunt is mind boggling
I don’t think there’s any team in MLB that’s collectively very good at bunting. That part of the game IMO mostly disappeared from the game a decade or two (or three) ago. The extension of the DH to the NL was just the last nail in the coffin.
Other than a handful (or less) of leadoff/speedy players who clearly practice bunting at least semi-regularly, IMO most managers don’t even want to ask a guy to bunt for fear they’re going to do it badly and either pop it up, or even worse, break a finger. I attend many m0re MiLB games than MLB games, and even at the lower minor league level bunting is quite often done badly.
That was more exciting and interesting than watching teams ignore small ball when they lack the resources to play power ball.
What’s worse, an Ashcraft or Douchmobile? Asking for a friend
There are Pirates “fans” who will moan about every move the Pirates make simply because it was the Pirates who made it.
Ashcraft? I always thought it was Asscraft?
“With a name like Asshat, he’s got to be good”
Well for all you fantasy league managers that believe ERA is a terrible statistic, what about BABIP??? Does someone that has given up a BABIP of .361 warrant a call up to the show? What does that say to the other players on the team that have better stats but weren’t high round picks?
BABIP is largely out of a pitcher’s control. It’s a matter of where balls happen to be hit.
Weakly hit balls find holes. Line drives are hit right at a fielder.
A .361 BABIP very likely means that he had bad luck on where balls happened to be hit.
You have to look at the things over which the pitcher has the most control – Strikeouts, walks, home runs, groundball percentage.
Richard- What happens if the pitcher is just plain no good and everybody hits the ball very hard off him?
You are implying that it is often just plain bad luck.
These stats have to be used with caution but a high babip usually means that the pitcher allows too many hard hit balls as long as the statistical sample is large enough.
Ashcraft had 10.4 K/9 at AAA, 3.5 BB/9, 0.9 HR/9, and a very good 51.6% groundball rate. Those numbers show that he was much better than his 5. ERA.
Two pitchers both pitch five perfect innings. In the sixth inning both pitchers walk the first three batters, loading the bases with no outs and are pulled from the game.
The reliever who comes in after the first pitcher’s strikes out three hitters and no runs score.
The reliever who comes in after the second pitcher allows a home run and all 3 of the runners on base score.
Both pitchers pitched exactly the same, but the first pitcher has a 0.00 ERA for the game and the second pitcher has a 5.40 ERA for the game. The difference is entirely because of what the relievers did.
That is a bad statistic.
Richard-You are cherry picking based on one theoretical situation.
Those things tend to even out over a period of time so that era is indeed in fact an important statistic telling how good a pitcher is.
Uh, no. A high BABIP indicates that the pitcher has probably been unlucky and that his BABIP and therefore his batting average against should be dropping soon. Some of you just don’t get this stuff, do you?
Actually some of us actually do.
You are using theoretical based on small sample sizes.
Large sample sizes tend to eliminate statistical aberrations.
So if you have a high Babip over a large sample size,guess what?
There isn’t anything unlucky about your data.
Give the Pirates credit… they called up Ashcraft today because they likely knew the DBacks would mash Heaney since they mash all lefties…. Then let the kid pitch some low leverage innings for his first work.
Another shut out for the lackluster Pirates offense, number 9 for the season which is the most in baseball
And against a never has been pitcher no less
The only positives, Cutch extends his hitting streak, Canario and Frazier each get 2 hits
The other negatives, Bart is now 0 for his last 12 plate appearances and Hayes is 0 for his last 16
It might be time to move Canario into the cleanup spot in the lineup
Shuffling chairs on the Titanic. At least they have Cruz in the right spot. The other 8… doesnt even matter
I admire the balls that Cruz sends like a missile 400+ feet, but he strikes out too much to be batting leadoff
59 times so far this year.
Striking out has become contagious with this team. Not only do they lead the majors in this category, they also lead the majors in called third strikes
Completely agree with all of this, but with this team and roster construction, Cruz has to bat leadoff
2 more strikeouts in last night’s game and another one so far today.
It wouldn’t be bad but he tends to swing at pitches nowhere close to the to the plate or is called out on strikes in the zone
That is a ridiculous statement.
Cutch should lead off,IKF second,and Cruz third.
The bottom of the batting order does not get on base enough so that Cruz is almost always batting with no one on base.
He is guaranteed to have no one on when he leads off the game.
The goal is to score runs,not to absolutely maximize the times at bat of a 230 hitter who strikes out a lot.
The team with the most runs still wins the game.
The proof of the pudding is that he only has twice as much RBI’s as home runs.
Is he the brother of Graham Ashcraft?
The Pirates seem to have great pitching, maybe even a surplus. Maybe they can trade for a hitter or 3.
Total nonsense to not calling up chandler