Right-hander Richard Fitts has pitched well in his bid for a starting job this spring, and Red Sox manager Alex Cora confirmed to reporters (including MLB.com’s Ian Browne) that Fitts had indeed landed the fourth starter’s role. Sean Newcomb and Quinn Priester now look to be the last two pitchers competing for the fifth spot behind Fitts, Garrett Crochet, Tanner Houck, and Walker Buehler.
Injuries have thrown a few wrinkles into Boston’s rotation plans this spring, as Brayan Bello (shoulder soreness), Lucas Giolito (hamstring strain) and Kutter Crawford (right knee soreness) will all start the season on the injured list. This put the rotation depth to the test immediately, allowing Fitts and others the opportunity to get their feet in the door for a starting slot.
Fitts already made a good accounting for himself last season, when he debuted in the big leagues as a September call-up and posted a 1.74 ERA over his first 20 2/3 innings in the Show. Originally a member of the Yankees’ farm system, Fitts came to Boston as part of the three-player package New York sent to the Red Sox for Alex Verdugo last winter. A 4.17 ERA in 116 2/3 innings for Triple-A Worcester paved the way for Fitts’ late-season audition in the bigs, and he has kept up the good form with a 2.45 ERA in 14 2/3 innings this spring.
While Fitts has booked his spot on the Opening Day roster, the Red Sox have plenty more decisions to make before breaking camp. Some of the roster trimming continued today, as MassLive.com’s Chris Cotillo and Christopher Smith report that right-hander Michael Fulmer and catcher Seby Zavala wouldn’t be making the team, and Julian McWilliams of the Boston Globe reports that the same is true of veteran pitchers Matt Moore and Adam Ottavino.
Moore and Ottavino are both Article XX(b) free agents, so their minor league deals contain built-in opt-out clauses for today, May 1, and June 1 unless their teams have selected those contracts to the 26-man roster. With the Sox informing Moore and Ottavino that they won’t be making the team, the ball is now in each player’s court as to whether or they’ll trigger their opt-out, or stick around in Boston’s farm system.
Zavala doesn’t have enough MLB service time to qualify for XX(b) status, but his deal have its own opt-out clause. Zavala told Cotillo that he’ll report to Triple-A Worcester unless he hears about another 40-man roster opportunity on another team within the next 24 hours. With Zavala not making the Opening Day cut, Carlos Narvaez looks to have all but officially wrapped up the backup catching job behind starter Connor Wong.
Fulmer’s two-year minor league contract doesn’t contain any opt-out provisions, so the former AL Rookie of the Year will head to Triple-A despite an impressive 0.96 ERA over 9 1/3 innings. A UCL revision surgery kept Fulmer on the shelf for the entirety of the 2024 season, which is why he inked that two-year pact with the Red Sox in February 2024. The early returns on Fulmer’s recovery look good, and he’ll bide his time in the minors waiting for a call to come for his return to the majors.
Beyond all of the internal options the Sox are considering, Cotillo and Smith write that the club could be looking to add some depth at first base. Triston Casas is the starting first baseman, and among bench options, Wong, Romy Gonzalez, and Rob Refsnyder all have experience at the position, though Refsnyder hasn’t played first since 2020, and deploying Wong at first base obviously creates a bit of a crunch behind the plate.
According to Cotillo and Smith, the Sox could have some interest in reuniting with Dominic Smith, even though Smith perhaps isn’t an ideal fit since he and Casas are both left-handed hitters. Smith played 84 games with Boston last year before being released in August, and Smith just re-entered the free agent market after opting out of a minors deal with the Yankees.
In some interesting behind-the-scenes Red Sox news, The Athletic’s Jen McCaffrey detailed some of the many organizational changes Craig Breslow has overseen since being hired as Boston’s chief baseball officer in the fall of 2023. Breslow has conducted something of an overhaul of several different departments within baseball options, ranging from installing new department heads to entirely changing how certain divisions operate. The perception is that the Sox are adopting more of an analytical-based approach, as evidenced by staffing increases to the research and development department and cuts made within the various scouting divisions.
As one might expect, not all of these changes have been welcomed with open arms, creating some tension within current and former members of the organizational staff. Breslow admitted that “without a doubt, we had to make really difficult decisions,” but “my hope is that whether people agree with those decisions or not, they understood that we were making the best decisions that we could in order to further this goal we have of competing for World Series championships year over year. I don’t know that there’s a finish line. We need to constantly evolve, track our progress, reevaluate.”
Fitts added a two-seam fastball and a curveball to his repertoire this spring while increasing velocity.
If it Fitts, good on him for making the rotation. Pretty good trade for the Red Sox from the Yankees.
If it Fitts, it ships.
That gave me an opportunity to chuckle. Thanks!
After the last two games, breslow should be on the phone to the marlins right now.
Anyone else see elsewhere where Yoshida is starting the year at Worcester? He’ll remain there until his arm is strong enough to play the field. Has it ever been? Smart move assuming Devers doesn’t get hurt. It’s also a way to showcase him potentially to other teams.
He was at least a marginal ML pitcher even before the improvements, I’m thinking he holds onto that job.
Best name in the history of the world.
I once knew someone with the last name Blumpkin. Unfortunately, their first name didn’t add to the joke.
Richard Lovelady and Brooks Pounders have entered the chat.
Boof Bonser objects.
Buddy Biancalana sends his regards
Dick Sisler
Dick Post
Dick Pole
Rusty Kuntz
Dick Such
Fair Hooker
Happy Feller
Biff Pocoroba
Let us not forget Handy Jobbers.
Bart – Okay I’m gonna end this debate now.
Absolutely NO PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL PLAYER has ever had a better name than this:
https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=hunt–002art
@FPG,
I am not worthy! You win!
Bart – If only Mike had played for the 2009 Red Sox!!
I could picture Heidi Watney looking for him to do an interview with him ….. “Has anybody seen ____ ____??” …. and both Tek and Nick Green turn around and reply “I have!”. ;O)
OMG, those were the days!!!!!!
Naw, the best name in the world belongs to a College football player named Noah Knigga…Real name the K is silent
bum – Staying on college and since March Madness is the focus right now, God was a Providence College (and later Washington Wizard) basketball player.
Yep that’s right …. his legal name was God Shammgod.
And people thought Jeter Downs had big shoes to fill. LOL!!
The Finish Line is winning the World Series!
Just like “Home is where you make it”..
“Hell, Everybody know dat”…
*Old man on Joe Dirt!*
Such a great movie and a very memorable, quotable scene. I’d only add:
“Old man ‘with thick, Cajun accent’ on Joe Dirt!”
The acquisition “cost” for Fitts was actually a benefit to the roster so this could rank as Breslow’s best move yet.
Swan – Definitely his best move!
I’d rank it as his best proven result so far. Some other moves already made might prove even better.
It will be interesting how the devers-free-left-infield (or at least, hopefully, severely curtailed left-infield playing time) bump helps with pitchers being fresher, longer, reducing wear, maybe even improving morale…
Priester for Yorke ultimately could end up being a statement one way or the other. I’ve repeatedly stated though Bloom made some food moves as well in hindsight but failed to address the staff. As far as the front office goes, it’s behind the scenes but it scares me to continue to further go to the computer instead of the eyes. At least they’re not relying more on psychologists when trying to measure a player’s abilities. Each has its place but to me old fashioned scouting and their eyes is the most important.
So far Yorke hasn’t made the jump. Tiny sample this spring had him around .200 with 2 extra base hits.
Nick Yorke got a cup of coffe in the bigs last year. I think this becomes the rare win-win trade when it’s all said and done. I think it’s fairly likely that Priester settles in as a back of the rotation pitcher with some of the advances he has made in velocity and pitch type since getting in the Red Sox organization.
Nick Yorke’s statcast page both in his cup of coffee and in AAA is a sea of red. He hits the ball hard he has big line drive numbers even in spring training this year just looking at his line drive numbers 35% he was very unlucky. It also appears he isn’t going to back to trying to pull the ball that’s what gets him in trouble. I have to admit haven’t really watched him since leaving the Red Sox org but if he’s using the whole field and hitting line drives he will be probably be up in a month or two. He’s going to be a solid big league hitter imo.
GASoxFan
So far Yorke hasn’t made the jump.
=================
I’d say they were both disappointments so far. But given a choice between two disappointments, I tend to stick with a pitching disappointment. They can always become RPs.
Joe: it’s way too early to label either player a disappointment.
Dick Fitts right into the 4th starter spot.
Fulmer not making the club is a bit surprising, however it does open the possibility that both Newcomb and Priester make the team.
Sox bullpen right now looks like Chapman/Hendriks/Slaten/Whitlock/Bernardino/Weissert/Wilson and whichever doesn’t win a starting job. However Kelly could snag a spot if the Sox decide to send Priester to Worcester
It looks like Newcomb will be the 5th starter, Priester will be a starter in AAA. Criswell was being talked about as a the long man/mop up.
Completely forgot about Criswell, and looking at his numbers it’s easy to see why
Criswell did a very nice job last year. He’s great depth.
Ghost – Yes Criswell did, but he was grossly mismanaged by Cora.
Case in point: During a must-win game, Cora pulled Criswell after just 4 innings and just 52 pitches …. despite pitching a perfect game!!
And who did Cora replace him with? Rich Hill, only because he’s a lefty. Cora the Idiot strikes again!!
Rsox – Yeah Criswell is the old toy and Newcomb/Priester/Fulmer are the shiny new toys for Cora to play with.
BTW – Remember when I said Justin Wilson would make the team despite the horrendous ST performance?
Cora has already stated Wilson will be on the OD roster. What a freakin’ joke.
Yeah, i remember. Hopefully Wilson’s bad spring translates into a good season.
Rsox – Cora announced only Chapman, Wilson, Slaten, Whitlock and Hendriks have made the team. He said he won’t decide on the remaining three until after the Mexico series.
He also said Adam & Matt have been eliminated.
Bernardino and Kelly make the team no matter what.
Would the Sox have interest in Luken Baker as RH 1B depth? The guy has been killing it this Spring and deserves a chance the Cardinals can’t give him.
Also, I’m a little confused. I thought Chaim Bloom was brought in to move toward a more analytics based approach. Did Bloom fail to make changes? Was ownership unwilling to let him make changes? Or is Breslow even more analytical than Bloom?
Good questions. Not sure of the answers. I think Bloom was very analytical.
Don – Bloom indeed greatly expanded the analytics department to over 300 and began heavy usage of metrics. As we all know, it didn’t work.
Personally I don’t care either way, as long as they have enough talented players to overcome the stupidity of misusing and overusing analytics. It’s like Rocky IV when Drago’s trainers used computer data and advanced technology… but didn’t know winning involves far more than that.
Information is always good. But it matters most how you apply it.
Bloom’s analytics certainly worked for the Red Sox farm system. After 4 drafts and international signing periods by Bloom and one of each by Breslow, the Red Sox now have the No.1 ranked farm system by Baseball America and the No. 3 ranked farm system by MLB Pipeline…and these rankings are after they traded their 2023 and 2024 first round draft picks (Teel and Montgomery) for Crochet. Bloom drafted Roman Anthony at pick 79 and Kristian Campbell at pick 132.
Don – Exactly! it’s like so many things these days …. dumb people take a good thing and misuse it.
Many great baseball minds have gone on record as saying a blend of analytics and non-analytics (scouting, visual observations, critical thinking) is the way to go.
Like Jim Rice said when he was verbally attacked by an analytics geek, what’s the point of him being in ST as a Special Organizational Instructor if he can’t even talk to players when asked about hitting.
Such a disgraceful organization, I would love to see how Breslow would have run the team if he had the clout to go with his title.
It’s not surprising to see you making unsupported accusations about the Red Sox.
You can learn more about hitting from a HoF hitter than a nerd with an Ipad any day of the week
Sure….and this makes the Red Sox a disgraceful organization?
Rsox – So very true!
So what’s next? When Jim Ed is giving his opinion on hitting during NESN pre-game and post-game, is the nerd gonna burst onto the set and make another disclaimer that Jim is wrong?
Fever I do think a combination of both analytics and old school approach is the way to go. I know that analytics preaches bat speed and launch angles and barrels but making contact seems like a lost art. Maybe over 162 game season pure analytics might win out but in the post season when it matters most and nerves are at there highest give me those guys that make contact and not the three true outcome guys. I’m pretty sure that’s what Jim Rice was preaching for all his power he would be one of the lowest K guys in baseball nowadays. I’d like to see more guys use the whole field and have a two strike approach to make contact like old school baseball.
There are things that actual human scouts can see in a player that will never show up in analytical data.
Pete Abraham reported today that the Sox overvalued Grissom in the Sale trade because they relied too much on data about bat speed, and downplayed scouting reports warning about a lack of athleticism.
Now we’re hearing that they’ve cut a lot of scouts, including some with lots of experience and connections.
I’m all for data in baseball. But the scouts are part of the story of the game. They make baseball better.
Well said, bcjd!
Do we know how many scouts they fired and how many they kept? This may not be a big deal.
According to the article in The Athletic , they fired about a third of their amateur scouting team, several of whom had multiple decades of experience.
The article certainly makes it sound like a big deal.
33% could be an issue. Maybe fired the older scouts who are likely set in their ways and will hire some new scouts.
Bcjd – This story about the firings was broken by Alex Speier back in September.
BTW – The scout responsible for landing Casas and Anthony was also fired.
“With new chief baseball officer Craig Breslow nearing the end of his first season with the Red Sox, changes across the organization are underway. According to multiple industry sources, the team has informed a number of longtime instructors and scouts that their contracts aren’t being renewed for 2025.
As part of an overhaul of the team’s pitching development efforts, three longtime pitching coordinators were informed they won’t be back: Pitching development advisor Ralph Treuel, who’d been with the organization since 1996 (including a brief stint as the big-league pitching coach in 2001 and as an interim bullpen coach in 2006); Latin America pitching and rehab coordinator Walter Miranda, who’d been with the organization since 2000; and pitching coordinator Chris Mears, who’d been with the organization since 2007.
Jimmy González, who managed the Sox’ rookie ball team in the Florida Complex League for the last four seasons, also was not renewed.
The Sox further declined to renew the contracts of three pro scouts: Anthony Turco, who’d been with the organization since 2003; and Blair Henry and Matt Mahoney, both of whom had been with the organization since 2006. Turco, Henry, and Mahoney had all spent several years in the team’s amateur scouting department before moving to the pro side.
The Sox already informed three members of their amateur scouting department — Mark Wasinger, Willie Romay, and Paul Fryer — that they wouldn’t be back.”
bcjd – Fantastic post!!! That’s why I enjoy this place so much, people like you bringing information and facts to the table. I hadn’t heard that about Grissom before, but it’s not surprising to me.
And they are looking to trade Grissom, which myself and others already pointed out a month ago that if he didn’t win the 2B job he’d be toast. Cora specifically told him to play well in AAA so that he appears more valuable to other teams. “Do your thing, show everybody that you can be a big leaguer, and not only with us, right? I think in the industry. Show them that you’re still young, you’re still a good athlete.’
Reminds me of Clint Eastwood in “Trouble With the Curve”.
Not exactly cinema history, but a good movie about a scout.
I liked it.
Scouts get things wrong just as much as the analytics guys. The fundamental problem is that there is literally no way to replicate Major League Baseball except by placing a player in MLB and seeing how he does for one year, a few years, or an entire career. The number of players who are great and everyone knows that beforehand? Few. The number of players who are really good and everyone knows that beforehand? A few more. The good players? Even harder to pick. To win, you need great, really good and good players. Lots of them. Good luck with that because 30 teams are competing for the pool.
hayzee – It’s not about great or even good players, it’s about great and good performances.
So many postseason MVP’s were guys that really were not good.
Steve Pearce was so bad he retired the year after he was WS MVP.
Billy Hatcher, another great WS performer that wasn’t very good.
That’s because opposing teams focus on the star players and not the “also” players. Al Weis.
In 3-5 years, Boston will either be seen as an innovation leader or suffer from major blind spots caused by over-reliance on AI-driven decision-making. The real test will be whether the system can still identify the unquantifiable aspects of baseball talent—or if the Sox end up missing out on the next Mookie Betts because the algorithm didn’t see it coming.
As long as the Red Sox still have Paul Toboni and Devin Pearson, who have been overseeing the Red Sox recent very successful drafts, I think they will likely be fine.
Dick Fitz in the rotation.