Yesterday saw the top remaining pitcher on MLBTR’s Top 50 MLB Free Agents list for the winter, southpaw Jose Quintana, come off the board when he reached an agreement with the Brewers on a one-year deal. That makes veteran right-hander Kyle Gibson, the #41 player on this offseason’s list, the top player remaining. With players like Quintana and Andrew Heaney having recently come off the board, it would hardly be a surprise to see that recent run on the remaining starters continue now that the calendar has flipped to March and Opening Day is less than a month away.
Gibson, 37, is the sort of player who tends to go underappreciated by fans but many clubs value. The veteran has typically been a slightly below average pitcher throughout his lengthy career, with a 93 ERA+ across both his 12 seasons in the majors overall and also in the five years since he first departed the Twins in free agency during the 2019-20 offseason. Despite those unimpressive numbers, Gibson still provides value to clubs through volume. The right-hander has posted at least 147 1/3 innings of work in every full season of his career, with only his partial rookie season in 2013 and the 60-game 2020 campaign falling beneath that figure.
While relying on a 37-year-old veteran for volume may seem counterintuitive when it’s common for players to struggle with staying healthy and effective as they age, Gibson has actually proven to be more durable than ever in his mid-to-late 30s: Since the start of his age-33 season in 2021, the veteran has made at least 30 starts each year and qualified for the ERA title in every season. In all, Gibson has made 124 starts with 711 1/3 innings of work total over the past four years. That’s a level of volume that’s become increasingly rare in today’s game: Gibson’s innings total is good for eighth in baseball over that timeframe, while his 124 games started is tied for seventh in baseball with Charlie Morton and Logan Webb.
Veteran innings-eaters of this sort are far from the most coveted assets in the game and will rarely make a club’s playoff rotation, but they still have value to teams in a number of situations. Rebuilding clubs without solid starting depth can often benefit from the stability and leadership a veteran can provide to its arsenal of young arms, and that’s a role Gibson previously filled in Texas. Even teams with playoff aspirations that either have lackluster depth in their rotations or are relying on young arms can benefit from the certainty offered by a player like Gibson; the Cubs and Mets signed Colin Rea and Griffin Canning to major league deals this offseason for their ability to eat innings in a pinch despite the fact that they had two of the three worst seasons among all qualified starters last year according to FIP.
Gibson offers a higher floor than either of those pitchers, though perhaps without the theoretical upside of Canning and the swingman experience of Rea. That should still be enough for the right-hander to command a major league deal this winter, however, and a handful of teams have expressed interest in his services throughout the winter. There appeared to be some level of mutual interest in a reunion between Gibson and the incumbent Cardinals even after St. Louis declined their club option on the veteran at the outset of the offseason, but a winter where the club failed to move a substantial salary like Nolan Arenado has seemingly left the front office’s hands mostly tied.
Outside of St. Louis, the Athletics and Tigers both reportedly expressed interest in Gibson at varying points during the winter, but both clubs have subsequently brought other rotation veterans into the fold and are no longer clear suitors for starting pitching help. The Guardians, Astros, Padres, and White Sox are among the teams who could theoretically make room for Gibson in their rotation but have not been publicly connected to the right-hander this winter. Aside from those more speculative fits, it’s worth noting that an injury or two could suddenly make a rotation spot available and push a team towards signing Gibson. After all, Quintana signed with the Brewers in a similar situation as the club dealt with injuries to youngsters DL Hall and Aaron Ashby. Other clubs that have suffered rotation injuries this spring include the Red Sox, Mets, Yankees, and Cubs, though it’s unclear if any of those clubs would consider looking outside the organization to fill that void rather than relying on internal depth options.
Where do MLBTR readers think Gibson will ultimately land? Have your say in the poll below:
If Jocketty were still there, the Reds would be a shoo in.
This made me suddenlly have a flashback to Shin-Soo Choo. I think Walt traded for him, if i recall right? Choo was really fun for that 2012 Reds team.
on the line which is dotted!
I have to bring up some bad news. Please forgive me if this is a bummer, but not all signature lines on a contract are actually dotted.
Bring back dot matrix printers!
I’ve got a 24-pin Panasonic in my basement.
I have some bad news. Mitch & Murray sent me.
Put that coffee down!
If Gibson was a closer…just sayin’.
#abc
He seems like a yankee
He seems like a mariner
He seems like a waste of time and money unless a team really badly needs a #6 starter.
Shouldn’t the question have been “Will anyone sign Kyle Gibson?”
If Alex Cobb is worth 15 mil so is a guy like Gibson. That was a bad signing by Detroit.
And there in lies the rub.
He’s ideal for a rebuild team but not at that price. And I argue too pricey for most contenders. So who is left? IMO, its the couple of teams that consider 15 mil, chump change. Drumroll please … Yankees, Dodgers, Mets.
Just because Detroit signed Cobb for $15mm doesn’t mean he will be worth it. Its never good to make a comparison with a contract that hasn’t worked out, like Baez, or with one that already looked bad before the player got injured (again), like Cobb.
He’s worth $10m all day.
Stymeedone. Hey there.
This late in the process, l think its safe to say he’s had more than a few offers … and at well below 15. If I’m his agent, I’m definitely using that Cobb deal as leverage. Again, that was a bad deal. It skewed the market.
There is one team outside the Dodgers, Mets and Yankees that may possibly pony up a 15 (or prorated amount) and that is the Braves but only after a couple of months in to the season there’s enough evidence the offense averaging over around 5.25 runs/game is sustainable. Braves leadership has stated they will spend more if necessary.
He’s made enough money. Retire
Where’s the unsigned option
Rakuten Golden Eagles.
come home Gibby, come home
Hopefully nowhere, because he sucks.
i dont know how guys like kyle gibson consistently find work.
career 4.52 era, 1.38 whip, 7.3 k/9. not terrible, not impressive. is it just the fact that he’s an innings eater and always healthy?
Did you not read the article? It clearly explains how he finds work.
You answered your own question.
Yeah, not terrible, so he would’ve been a #5 starter at worst for most teams at the beginning of the offseason. The Cardinals would’ve picked up his option for $11M had they not decided to cut payroll.
Get him, Pirates. He’s there for the taking.
I like how the Dodgers are always mid-pack in these polls even though the player is not an improvement over anyone already on their roster. Money plays.
I figure if I vote the Braves on every poll, eventually I might be right.
The Mets. I can smell the desperation in the rotation..
1 year $5M just to fill in until their rotation is mostly healthy……which could be most of the year, unfortunately.
I voted Pirates, but honestly I have no idea. Braves make sense, his price tag has probably lowered and the Braves might do it for 4 or 5 million.