There seems to be a great deal of frustration surrounding the Mariners, which isn’t limited to the fanbase. Former Mariner Justin Turner sounded off on the situation to Bob Nightengale of USA Today yesterday, blasting the organization for its lack of aggression. That column led to Ryan Divish of The Seattle Times seeking the response of various players, who kept themselves anonymous. President of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto also spoke about the state of the franchise to Sam Blum of The Athletic in a piece published today, though the piece didn’t reference Turner’s comments or the USA Today piece and said the Dipoto interview actually took place “earlier” this spring.
“The fact that they missed the playoffs by one game, and didn’t go out and add an impact bat or two when you have the best pitching staff in baseball,” Turner said to Nightengale, “just seems absurd to me.”
The Mariners went 85-77 last year, a solid season and their fourth straight above .500. But as Turner mentioned, they narrowly missed the playoffs, just as they did in 2021 and 2023. Their postseason appearance in 2022 is their only one since 2001. Their decent-but-underwhelming results last year were the result of an imbalanced team. Their 3.49 earned run average was tied with Atlanta for best in the league. The starting staff’s 3.38 ERA was best in the majors. But the offense was more middling, with a .224/.311/.376 batting line as a club.
The club surely would have loved to add more offense but didn’t have significant resources to do so. Reporting throughout the winter indicated that the Mariners were going to increase payroll by around $15MM relative to last year. Cot’s Baseball Contracts estimated their Opening Day payroll at $140MM. RosterResource projects them to go into 2025 at $152MM, a $12MM increase. Their free agent signings this winter have been a $3.5MM deal for Donovan Solano, a 37-year-old infielder, and bringing back Jorge Polanco. The M’s turned down a $12MM club option on Polanco, opting for the $750K buyout, but re-signed him via a one-year, $7.75MM deal with a player/vesting option.
Generally speaking, the club hasn’t been a big player in free agency. Cot’s hasn’t had the club’s payroll higher than 11th in the league in any of the past 15 seasons. They’ve been in the bottom half of the league in each of the past five years. In the past decade, they have only twice given a free agent a guarantee larger than $24MM. Yusei Kikuchi got a four-year, $56MM deal back in 2019, though he opted out after three years. Robbie Ray got a five-year, $115MM deal but was traded to the Giants after two years.
Turner was acquired from the Blue Jays at last year’s deadline and finished the year with the Mariners. According to Divish, the club offered him a deal to return, with the guarantee larger than the $6MM pact he eventually accepted from the Cubs. At the time of the offer from the M’s, Turner seemingly felt he could do better and didn’t accept, which prompted the M’s to pivot to Solano and Polanco.
Turner made clear that his criticism wasn’t mere sour grapes about not being re-signed. “Honestly, as much as I wanted to be back there,” Turner said to Nightengale, “if I was the only piece they brought back in, I would be saying the same thing: What the hell are we doing? Are you trying? There’s not going to a better time to go for it. So, I don’t know what they’re doing. I’m very confused. It’s a head-scratcher for me.”
Ultimately, the criticism is mostly geared towards ownership and the lack of resources it has provided to the front office. “I thought [Pete] Alonso was a slam-dunk,” Turner said. “How can you not go after him? You kidding me?” But Alonso re-signed with the Mets on a two-year, $54MM deal. He will get $30MM of that in the first year, which is double what the Mariners had to work with this winter. Turner emphasized that he didn’t hold Dipoto responsible for the parameters he was given.
“I think Jerry catches a bad rap for a lot of these trades and how crazy some of these trades have been,” Turner said. “But now being a part of it, I kind of understand. He doesn’t have any money to spend, so he’s got to create money. Like, OK, is it really Jerry’s fault?” Turner then referenced the 2021 trade wherein the M’s sent Kendall Graveman to the Astros for Abraham Toro, saying he “probably needed to trade guys just to be able to spend money in the offseason, which is nuts.”
Turner also expressed sympathy for the club’s frustrated supporters who are caught up in the situation. “I feel for them. They’ve got great fans. Their fans are amazing. They want to win so bad. The team is very profitable. And they don’t spend.”
It’s perhaps illustrative of a level of discontent that exists in the Seattle clubhouse but doesn’t always come out. Catcher Cal Raleigh expressed some frustration after the club’s disappointing 2023 season finished, though he later apologized. “We’ve got to commit to winning,” Raleigh said at that time, “to going and getting those players. You see other teams going out, going for it, getting big-time pitchers, getting big-time hitters. We have to do that to keep up.”
Turner is no longer in the organization and is also 40 years old, meaning he doesn’t have to fear any negative repercussions for speaking out. The incumbent Mariners who spoke to Divish refrained from going on the record but seemed to largely agree with Turner’s points.
Though the player frustration seemed to be largely pointed at ownership, many Seattle fans have their frustrations with Dipoto. His now-infamous “54%” comments from October of 2023 are sort of legendary among his haters. For those unfamiliar, after the club just missed the playoffs in October of 2023, Dipoto said that “teams that win 54 percent of the time always wind up in the postseason and they more often than not wind up in a World Series. … Nobody wants to hear ‘the goal this year is we’re going to win 54 percent of the time.’ But over time that type of mindset gets you there.”
Blum asked him about those comments and his general ability to speak in a manner that seems to rub people the wrong way. “People obviously didn’t understand it the way I expressed it,” Dipoto said. “My guess is that 98 percent of people didn’t actually listen to it. They just read it off a tweet. It’s what it is. Maybe they wouldn’t have understood it any better had they heard the whole thing. And that’s on me for poorly communicating what I think is a simple idea.”
Dipoto says he has scaled back his media appearances since he’s aware that he’s become something of a lightning rod. “Truly, I could say ‘hello,’” Dipoto said, “and it would turn into a thing right now.” He also expressed to Blum that the very interviewing he was giving would probably not be well received. “I’m gonna get roasted,” he said to Blum.
He did somewhat attempt to frame the lack of spending as a strategy, saying that most great teams have been “built on a foundation of draft, sign, develop or trade. That’s what we’ve communicated to our fans for a decade.” Though at the same time, he also said he’s aware there’s a desire for “The big move. The grand slam. The big free agent.” and that “maybe that’ll happen at some point” but they “didn’t think this was the right time, or the right group of players that fit for us.”
Regardless of how one feels about it, the club is largely banking on the Seattle lineup continuing a strong finish to the 2024 season. The club acquired both Turner and Randy Arozarena at the deadline last year. A few weeks later, they fired manager Scott Servais and hitting coach Jarret DeHart. Servais was replaced by Dan Wilson while Edgar Martínez took over as hitting coach. Martínez is still with the club but with the title of senior director, hitting strategy. He’s not expected to go on road trips, with Kevin Seitzer now to be the club’s primary hitting coach, though he will apparently report to Martínez.
For what it’s worth, the M’s hit .264/.347/.433 in the month of September. That translated to a 128 wRC+ for that month, a mark that trailed only the Dodgers. That was a huge upgrade over the .216/.304/.364 they hit from March to August. We’re talking about just one month, and some of Seattle’s opponents were out of contention and playing out the string. But if there was any meaningful improvement in there that the M’s could carry over, they could be in a better position than last year. If not, it could lead to another offseason of frustration in Seattle.
Turner is speaking for thousands of mariner fans me included. That’s why after 50 years I’m done with them until they prove otherwise that they want to win. I’m not going to support a team that just wants my money and doesn’t want to win. That’s no way to root for a team. You want that team to win a championship and this ownership group has no interest in that. So i’m changing allegiances…LFGM!!!
If enough fans would cancel season tickets cancel cable bill they would make more effort. Maybe. They seem stupid. I see a good fan base and a baseball town. Winning the off season and making playoffs and the $ would rush in. AL west isn’t that impressive. Missed opportunity. Wouldn’t take a massive trade or mega contract. All you had to do was take on Bellinger contract. Give Santana or better yet Goldschmidt 14 15 million. Naylor Lowe didn’t take a lot to get. Or sign Justin Turner!!!!!!!!!!
I wish we could have a boycott like what Oakland did in their final years, we aren’t in their situation but it would still be nice
I couldn’t believe we couldn’t get Santana back or someone like Josh naylor it just makes me hate this club more
Seattle sports is a lot like Cleveland where it’s misery everywhere and a single championship for us is like a drop in the bucket for the dodgers
I wish we could have a boycott like what Oakland did in their final years,
=========================
Oakland fans have been boycotting for over 30 years.
Casual fans will never stop attending because the product has the team in contention until the end of every regular season.
“Take on Bellinger contract”.. I don’t see Belli solving the offensive woes the M”s got. He’s consistently inconsistent.
I don’t see fading(faded)stars Goldy or Santana doing the trick either. Didn’t they just have Santana already in recent years?
Assuming the M’s don’t want a MEGA(albatross) contract on the books, they simply have to draft, develop and trade better.
Jerry Dipoto might have taken the M’s as far as he can and it may be time for new leadership and thinking.
The Dodgers/Yankees/Mets can add a Justin Turner type and benefit, because they’ll be surrounding him with all kinds of other + hitters.
The Mariners simply cannot do this and acquiring another Goldy/Santana type is simply putting a band-aid on a dam break.
The Mariners have the resources. They simply have to allocate, direct and develop them better and more efficiently.
The bad yields worse though. When the team sucks they wind up on smart players’ no-trade bylines. That’s what 40 years of bad baseball buy you. You have no choice but to gamble on longshot bets.
The Mariners will always stink. The hockey team stinks and, under the corporate ownership, the Seahawks will stink. Most teams are a new owner away from a turnaround but Seattle people are greedy.
M’s haven’t been bad recently. Just coming up a bit short. A couple Goldy Bellinger types could have made the difference. Both are projected to be high 700 low 800 ops. If you want 900 you have to give Soto a billion or trade away a ton for Tucker. You have to settle for whats realistically available.
Doesn’t matter. It’s not about actually winning. It’s getting your customers to believe you are trying and winning is possible.
Look how negative the M’s fans are. Vs Yankees fans who lost Soto. Who they bring in? Bellinger Goldy. Big names. Doesn’t matter they aren’t as good as they once was. You can’t replace Soto but you do the best you can. Yankees fans are feeling good, think they can win division. Think they can win world series. Paredes Walker ain’t Bregman Tucker. But fans appreciate they tried. Just make a effort.
2/3 owners don’t spend. Getting a new one garuntees nothing. It could be an even tight fisted owner.
Dipoto is one of the best GM’s in the league with those resources and that stadium. Only way they sign hitters is by overspending or finding guys no one else wants. Probably harder to sign a hitter there than anywhere.
I don’t think that would work tbh. Their ownership has a very corporate mindset. They would just reduce the budget. Maybe they’d eventually sell if they ran out room to lower the budget, but we see the owners of the Marlins, Rays, Pirates, White Sox, etc. hang around forever with the same mindset.
Like, why do you own a team if you’re going to operate it like the Pirates? There are easier billion dollar assets to manage if it’s just an ego trip.
Most owners in baseball are around for profit and don’t care about rings
Ownership is everything teams can go from frank mccourt to Guggenheim partners or wilpons to Steve cohen or stay bad like with the orioles and rubenstein
But few as profitable. On top of that, the average franchise increases in value about 12% every year.
YourDreamGM
All you had to do was take on Bellinger contract.
========================
In 2024, Belli had a 2.2 bWAR. JRod had a 4.3, Aro had a 1.0 in 199 ABs, and Robles had a 3.1 in 229 ABs. Their OF as a whole ranked #10th in OPS, which is pretty good considering the ballpark.
Their IF ranked #23 in OPS. That where you should start looking.
You wanna bet on Robles winning the MVP? You need 4 outfielders. A dh. Bellinger can play 1b. Betting on everyone staying healthy and as good as last year doesn’t seem like a good plan to me.
And I’m trying to sell tickets and tv packages. There’s room for growth.
Bellinger alone doesn’t do a ton for either but add a few other moves and fans are feeling good and team has a better chance at winning.
I’d bet Julio is better than last year, and will more than make up for any regression from Robles. Arozarena will be around all year too.
Bold
YourDreamGM
And I’m trying to sell tickets and tv packages. There’s room for growth.
=============================
This I agree with 100%. I’d bet that the Mariners could easily sell another 300k tickets, maybe more. But your infield is worse than your outfield.
And I’m not saying this to be sarcastic, but based on ST results, I am not sure who is in your IF. So far, I see Raley, Moore, Crawford, and maybe Solano & Bliss???
JoeBrady
Infield has been dead area in free agency for awhile. Other than 1b C. Why you need to take care of it yourself with farm system. Need to draft develop and have a plan years in advance.
You could go out and get Paul Goldschmidt at age 31 and Nolan Arenado at age 30 and still end up being the St Louis Cardinals
Cards did well. Some 90 win seasons. Over 3 million attendance.
Yep, as about rewarding as the 2001 Mariner’s. That’s the furtherst they ever made it too, The championship series and that was in 19 before Arenado was even on the team. After they traded for him they’ve won exactly 0 playoff series kinda like the present Mariner’s
2022 was the beat season, and it was because they added pujols and others in the offseaon and made deadline deals for Quintana ect
Think you are forgetting 1995
Under luxury tax. Heck under 200m. They aren’t supposed to win playoffs series
If you were really a Mariners fan for 50 years, you’d know that this team has been bad more often than it’s been good. We don’t root for the Mariners because we demand a championship, we root for the Mariners because we’re from Seattle. So it’s ride or die. Our city, our team. who else are you gonna root for? The Angels? Please!
The Mets baby Cohen will do whatever it takes to win unlike these idiots.. I’m tired of perennial losers I want someone who wants to win a championship!. LFGM!
It takes at least 180M-200M to afford enough talent to win the World Series today with where salaries have gone! At 152M you are left scouring the waver wire to fill some of your holes as were talking about a roster of 26 players sharing an average salary of 5.5M each. Three superstar salaries mean the rest of your roster is paid less than 3M each on average! Once players reach arbitration the 3M becomes unrealistic for the younger talented players!
So Justin wants to stick that big fork they get after home runs in them.
Too bad they couldn’t bring JT back; Solano should be a better bat with more defensive flexibility though.
Yes, Dipoto is not at fault, it is ownership.
The bulk of the budget issues are not Dipoto’s fault. He has to play the cards he’s dealt. However, no one forced him to sign an unproven Evan White to that contract either. As a former pitcher, he allocated too high a percentage of resources on pitching development vs hitting. While highly successful at developing pitchers, woefully inadequate when it comes to hitters. The 54% comments illustrate his perspective and he placed too much value in an analytics department that delivered middling results for years. The Graveman for Toro trade was not necessary at the time and illustrates his massive disconnect from team chemistry and competitive valuations. If you think of a guy like Pete Carroll inspiring confidence, competitiveness and trust from his players, you can likewise imagine the opposite being true of Jerry Dipoto.
All fair points; however, I still think a personality and skillset like his is best for a situation like this; There are similar situations in PIttsburgh and Miami, and those FO execs haven’t proven to be wildly successful either.
As an Orioles fan, a lot of this sounds familiar, except what the Orioles have is a very productive young offense and their rotation hasn’t been a strength since the late 90s. They Frankensteined the rotation over the winter…a 41 year old guy, a 35 year old guy from Japan, and will come back with the 35 year old journeyman who had a season out of nowhere last year, a Jekyll and Hyde type (Kremer) and unproven youth whose ceilings didn’t go much above 4/5.
It seems that the Mariners have a young, talented, controllable pitcher to spare and the Orioles have someone like Mountcastle who has power, or Mayo/Kjerstad who they are unwilling to give a chance to who the Mariners could use. It would be a win/win. All winter on both Mariners and Orioles posts, this came up. It seems neither owner is interested in making that not-very-expensive step to fulfill obvious needs. Very disappointing.
Mountcastle isn’t a player the M’s fans have interest in. And the 4 young controllable starters are the only 4 pitchers on the team that are untouchable. Neither franchise is willing to trade the players the other team desires.
In breaking news, the Mariner’s owners today fired themselves. “The great fans in Seattle deserve a lot better than us as owners of this franchise,” they wrote in a prepared statement. “We hope new owners can be found who will care a lot more about winning than we ever did.”
BlueSkies_LA;
I love your posts, but you’re wrong here.
Plenty of teams can contend in MLB with lower budgets than the Mariners. They do it by having an influx of young players coming up from their farm system that can impact the team while playing for low salaries. So they trade out older players with high salaries to stay within their budget constraints.
Dipoto’s organization doesn’t do that. Every few years he does a radical tear-it-down and build-it-up – like incompetent / ineffective politicians do. He labeled the last one: “Reimagining”. Then what happens?…….
As soon as a few players have good years he signs them to exorbitant multiple-year contracts. He uses up his overall budget and leaves himself no flexibility. Within a few years many of those players are overpaid for the coming season. No one will trade anything of value for them because the players are locked into being overpaid for years. So the organization has painted itself into a corner. Inevitably Mariner fans post on here about the “cheap” ownership group.
The guy is one of the worst FO heads in MLB. But the fans love the transactions. Remember when the was making trades from his hospital bed? MLBTR loved it! Rotisserie League for real!! Unfortunately for Mariner fans MLB is not Rotisserie League. It’s a business. There is no draft entering every season.
Predictable cycles. LOL
DiPoto did one teardown. ONE. They were bad for 2 years, and have won 85-90 games the last 4 years. With money, he could have 3-4 straight playoffs.
He’s rebuilt a hitter-heavy top 5 farm in the meantime, so we’ll see how that adds to the foundation they graduated in the past 4 years.
Thanks. I’ve been wrong about a lot of things, but in this case, I don’t know what!
Speaking of teams trying to do things on the cheap…
What happens to the Orioles in 2027, 2028 when the dominos start to fall on the young players they haven’t extended? Rutschman, then Westburg and Henderson. Signing these guys to “exorbitant, multiple year contracts”…which in reality is signing a player who is a known quantity to you for fair market value… is how you build fan loyalty and make Baltimore a place that players want to play, because they will think the ownership is committed to winning long term.
After all, I thought the point of the sport was to try and win and also for attracting fans whose tax dollars are supporting the stadiums being built, not for people trying to show off to their buddies that they are the smartest in the room.
Hard cap, hard floor. Why should some teams have the opportunity to compete every year while others pocket revenue sharing and hope that they can be “good enough” for a couple years?
I also don’t remember Seattle going through seasons with 115, 110, and 108 losses 3 times in a 4 year period. Maybe one season with more than 90 losses? At least not allowing fans’ hope to be crushed by June 1.
I don’t understand the fascination with caps and floors. They are mirages. Not only will they never happen, they wouldn’t improve competitiveness even if they did.
A floor would have to be set low enough that the lowest revenue teams could afford to pay it. Now you’ve simply set a race to that floor for the rest of the smaller revenue teams. A cap only limits the size of contracts offered to the top free agents. They will still sign with the teams with payrolls near the top limit. In the end, this is really just a scheme to enrich team owners at the expense of the players.
If you really want to improve competitiveness, divide the total game revenue 30 ways. Then, reward the teams that succeed instead of those that fail. This will never happen, either. But at least it would work if it did happen.
If rev shared equally, then all teams would be able to afford a floor.
The % rev share going to players has to increase from where it was to what NFL has for example (up 10-12% from where it is, I keep reading 38-40%)
I don’t think any of this is going to happen either….and neither do I think the 2027 season will happen.
If revenue is shared equally, then no floor or cap is needed, as every team starts the season with the same spending capability. The key to this working is teams then being rewarded for success, instead of for failure, as they are now. This translates into postseason revenue and higher draft picks for the winners. No rewards for tanking.
Hope you are right about 2027. We face this threat every five years. Both sides like to talk about how they’re prepared to blow the entire game up unless they get what they want, but in the end, self-interest prevails. The issues never change, so I expect a repeat of 2021-22. Lots of posturing, then a deal.
Blue Skies – you are probably right about the work stoppage, the owners are prepared and I can see the players caving with minimal gain. Again. Band-aid it, repeat in another 5 years.
For salaries, if you don’t put a floor, teams like the Orioles and Oakland will compete for the non-existent prize of most wins per dollar of payroll rather than truly compete for the piece of metal, and spending for the top few teams is very out of proportion to the rest of the group.
The current revenue system isn’t designed to encourage competitiveness; it’s designed to keep all the franchise owners fat and happy. Which, apparently, it does. MLB could make this into a competition for dollars as well as the piece of metal, in the form of postseason revenue and better draft picks for the more successful teams. The crisis in baseball, if there is one, is a function of MLB not seeming to fully grasp that the game is an entertainment, and for a lot of fans in a lot of cities, it is not very entertaining. It is this way not by accident, but by design.
Yep. The line of billionaires swooping in when teams are for sale explains that. They are too smart w/ $ to be buying teams if they weren’t making $ off of it.
I am a JT fan for life now. A well respected, well traveled longtime MLB All Star holding the front office accountable in a very public way.
I love it.
Easier to do when it may be your final year and M’s ain’t going to ever sign you anyways.
That’s exactly why he did it. He certainly didn’t need to be as honest as he was, and in fact it could be argued that the response was “unprofessional.” By that I simply mean, is it a great look to speak negatively about the company you previously worked for?
In this specific example I think (or would like to believe, I guess), that he kne
w if he spoke up; it would add more attention to a situation which we fans are desperate to change.
Not that this is going to be the onus of a sell, I’m not naive about that, I just think it’s cool that he was willing to put himself out there, clearly having the back of his former teammates and really the whole organization below management, including us fans.
I like he did.
Justin Turner is forgetting about the additions of Randy and Robles. Robles was once ranked higher than Juan Soto. Justin Turner is just parroting the negative nancies who love complaining..
He’s also forgetting that they traded for Justin Turner.
You actually think he has forgotten his own teammates from just months ago?
Of course he hasn’t.
He recognized–like most fans–that they had glaring holes at third, second, and DH, plus a need for a first base platoon bat and better bench options. They brought in exactly one new name. They lack depth, lack talent, and it’s not a new problem.
And then there are the bullpen questions.
This isn’t about complaining. It’s about recognizing the reality of the situation and responding fairly and rationally.
Turner wants good things for Seattle and its fans. You’re trying to turn that into something negative. It’s the opposite.
Maybe having Turner, Robles and Arozarena for a full season would be enough to get that extra win. They were at least willing to make some trades to improve last deadline.
Pete Alonso/Bregamn might not of had any intention/interest of signing with Seattle. They’re probably not on Arenados list of acceptable teams.
Good 3B were hard to come by this offseason. One signed for $30m aav and the other was traded for a top 5 player in the league. Would Urshela have been better? Or hope an injured HSK is healthy and has a bounce back year? Jump on the Jose Iglesias train? Obviously they expected to get someone better than Rojas but it doesn’t always work out
Teams don’t get better by not adding.
Jerry is either towing the company line here or he’s completely clueless (or both). There’s a reason that pretty much every major sports organization has graded this offseason as a D or an F for the M’s. I mean, the most impactful acquisition this winter was Kevin Seitzer as hitting coach. They couldn’t have topped Cody Poteet as the return in a Cody Bellinger trade? Or Echedry Vargas, Max Acosta, and Brayan Mendoza for Jake Burger? He talked about how he’s been pushing draft/develop/trade for a decade; that’s led to ONE playoff appearance in that period, and based on just pure random luck, the Mariners should have been in the playoffs at least 3 times. Dipoto’s overall resume as a GM (both in Seattle and Anaheim) is flat out unimpressive and he should simply not say anything anymore lest 98% of us not “get him” (yet another stupid statement). And while the ballpark is certainly a factor in hitters choosing not to sign with Seattle, I think that Turner’s comments show that many players simply feel that Mariners ownership has no desire to spend on a winner and would be on an island if they came here. It’s a top-down problem that won’t get better anytime soon, given that next year’s free agent class is top-heavy with pitchers as opposed to hitters.
Jody Allen, PLEASE BUY THE TEAM!
There’s no such thing as Jody Allen. She’s a person but Paul’s assets are managed for profit now. The Mariners are a spreadsheet formula. Profit happens despite sub-mediocre talent. Why mess with success, Mariners ownership cracked the code.
1. as far as acquiring a big bat- it takes 2 to tango. 2. every team has complainers. look at NYY- Dj is the story now, and “if he cant play, who’s gonna play 3b…”. 3. “go out and spend the money, get Pete…”. sounds good, when it not your money. 4. we could be Marlin or Rockie fans?
Doesn’t take 2. Bellinger Lowe Naylor had no say in where they were going. If those players fetched some awesome return I get it. But they didn’t. M’s weren’t even mentioned were they? I don’t remember them being close to anything other than their dumpster dives.
Bellinger isn’t close to being the answer for the M’s. I’m not a fan, and I’m guessing Dipoto isn’t either. That’s a bad contract that most teams want nothing to do with.
What AZ gave up for Naylor was a good return for him. I don’t blame Dipoto for not offering more than that for one year of Naylor.
Bellinger has a perfect swing for Yankee Stadium. Guy will rake in the Bronx.
AZ didn’t give up anything. A pitcher they couldn’t develop and a draft pick unlikely to hit. Will get a much better draft pick when they qualifying offer Naylor. Hopefully.
It’s not about winning. You’d like to. It’s increasing $.
Perfect fit NYY. Cubs ate 5m. And in NY $ that contract isn’t as bad.
Issue is right now that Bellinger has to play CF and LF while Dominguez figures it out lol
You’re saying that draft pick is basically useless? That’s a huge assumption. There’s no guarantee whoever it is won’t hit. Why would they even have that draft round if nobody taken then would hit? There are plenty of guys taken later in the draft, Bellinger for one, taken in the 4th round, that are productive players, not useless.
It’s debatable whether AZ will make the QO to Naylor. It’s marginal if they do, and also marginal if he’d accept it. It’s kind of illogical to say there’s value in AZ making the QO. If it was the Guardians could have kept him for the QO draft pick. They didn’t because they wanted to maximize what they could get, instead of letting him walk
That draft pick is worth much less than Naylor’s surplus value. Odds are it won’t amount to much. It’s a numbers game so you never know but nothing to cry over. See who gets drafted and does what. Could be a cy young MVP but most likely doesn’t do much of anything.
If healthy he should get QO at worst you get a highly motivated player on a 1 year deal. At best you get your draft pick.
Here’s the guys that got QOs last season, their bWAR, and years of service:
Juan Soto, 36.4, 7 years
Corbin Burnes, 17.1, 7 years
Alex Bregman 39.6, 9 years
Max Fried, 23.1, 8 years
Willy Adames 21.5, 7 years
Pete Alonso, 19.8, 6 years
Anthony Santander, 11.1, 8 years
Teoscar Hernández, 17.1, 9 years
Nick Pivetta, 10.3, 8 years
Christian Walker, 15.1, 10 years
Sean Manaea, 15.0, 9 years
Luis Severino, 13.5, 9 years
Nick Martinez, 8.7, 7 years
Josh Naylor has 6.0 over 6 years. His best season was 2023, when he put up 2.5 WAR, which put him in a tie for 96th best. And it was his only season of 2 WAR or better, per BB Ref. Last season it was 1.5. Unless he has a huge year, not just a big one, he isn’t getting a QO. That’s the reason the Guards got what they could for him, and why the M’s didn’t try to top the offer from AZ.
Guardians did well. Only year that matters for Naylor is 2025
I’d agree with that, but you can’t ignore past performance. Based on what he’s done in his career, 2025 will have to be extraordinary for AZ to even consider the QO.
We just have a different thought process. I am not saying he will be worth 21m a year. Just he is likely going to want a multi year deal so you are hoping his greed will make him reject the offer. But if he does accept you get him on a 1 year deal. As a free agent it would take multiple years or opt outs player options. The nearing 40 years old 1b got 12m. So 21m isn’t going to kill your payroll. You hope he declines QO. Just something to think about. If he has a under 800 ops year you don’t give him a QO. But if he is good it’s something to consider strongly.
His all around hitting and defense have improved from earlier years. I don’t even care what he does in 2025. Only care about what he will do during contract I give him. 2026 2027 whatever. 2025 will just be the most recent data.
You’ve totally missed my point. You keep bringing up the QO, but it’s extremely unlikely he even gets one. Guys who rank 96th in WAR do not get QOs.
On the wildly slim chance he got a QO, he would definitely accept it, based on 2026 being his age 29 season. He could make double what he’s worth for one year, and enter free-agency still under the age of 30.
Goldschmidt isn’t a good comp. He got $12.5M based on past performance. He’s one year removed from a 3.4 bWAR, and 2 years removed from a 7.7. That past performance is miles better than Naylor’s. With Goldschmidt the Yanks are betting on a bounce back. AZ is expecting somewhere between a 1.5 and 2.0 bWAR.
Dipoto has skills in tearing a bad team down and bringing them back to okay. The farm system, which last I checked doesn’t get to compete for the World Series, is now good. But he doesn’t have any clue on how to win a championship. This year, world series or bust, my friend.
It’s bust, Zippy. They’re relying on too many hitters having comeback seasons (Crawford, Arozarena, Polanco, Garver) and still having basically a zero at 2B (Moore will do well for about 2 weeks and then crater… as is tradition).
Zoinks, Zoinks, I fear you are correct.
To be fair, ownership mislead him as well. He made many semi-definitive statements (promises) and he’s had to walk back.
I can appreciate his transparency. I think most fans think he doesn’t hear them or empathize with their frustration. He most certainly does. My problem with him has been his defense of ownership. They threw him under the bus and he made excuses for them that weren’t even necessary. Perhaps the most annoying excuse was suggesting that the free agent class a few years ago wasn’t actually that good (2022-2023 offseason)..
I still question his ability to develop hitters. He seems to be banking on getting help internally. I have reservations.
I’m not suggesting that the M’s don’t need to invest in players, but former and current players may not be the best(or neutral) sources for how, why and how much money teams spend.
They have a built-in bias to encourage teams to recklessly spend money whether it helps the team or not.
That being said, it’s baffling how years(if not decades)go by and the M’s are still looking for “one more good hitter” and can’t find him in the draft, trades nor free agency.
No one is asking them to spend recklessly. Just to spend enough to improve the team so they can avoid wasting this window with this incredible rotation. Putting at 15M limit on increased spending is insane. There were plenty of affordable players out there they had chances at who were better than old man solano and polanco. The fact that Haniger is still on the team is disgraceful
You touched on something really important…
We hear a lot about draft-develop-trade, but they have developed exactly two hitters and have had limited success with trades. They have far more misses from that philosophy (on the hitting side).
Something has to give. They’ve consistently been short..
Jerry said something in that ‘Times article that caught my attention. He actually said two things that caught my attention. One, was that he expressed doubt about getting that ‘big bat’ when the time comes (it has come and passed multiple times). The other was about staying focused on the process and not chasing a World Series, believing that good process will get them to the World Series.
But the process is flawed for the reasons stated above. If they can’t develop bats, or if it takes too long, and they can’t trade for the star power they need (or won’t, because they stubbornly think they can develop everything they need), it’s all just a waste of time.
They’re destined for more mediocrity because they don’t show that killer instinct or take the necessary risk (fight) and show that they really want it.
Jerry seems to worry more about the long-term than he does the opportunities right in front of him, and as much as I blame ownership for this mess, at the end of the day, he knows what he has to work with. He should be willing to trade his best prospects or even make an unpopular move if it nets Seattle what they need to seriously contend.
If no one is going to name and shame him, I will: The owner of the Mariners is John Stanton. I’m surprised his name wasn’t brought up,
Even JT didn’t use his name and understood that DiPoto has his hands tied.
The question is who they trading Castillo to this year?
He can be found sailing the seas on his brand spanking new mega yacht he calls “The Supremacy”. It’s loaded with all the newest bells and whistles. It even has an Iron Dome defense system in case he’s ever approached by free agent hitters or their agencies.
Goes with the job. Being a GM means you take it on the chin.
Fan’s anger should be directed towards the owner.
It’s the same thing on the North side with Hoyer. “Rickets is just trying to break even”.
Unfortunately seems like majority of baseball owners are going this route. As a Cardinal fan they’re headed this way. Majority of NL Central is like this. Owners just keeping the profits and not reinvesting back into team. Really only a handful of teams really spend and they are in the major markets
There is a reason for that, which is why the next work stoppage will be a long one. Major markets vs. the other 20-25.
I agree, but in addition to that, teams seem to be valuing their prospects more than ever before. The M’s don’t want to trade their young pitchers for hitting, just like the O’s don’t want to trade their young position guys for pitching. It’s understandable financially, since, if the young guys turn into stars, they’re cheap for the production they provide.
If you knew that the difference between spending $100 million or $180 million was absolutely nothing because the Dodgers and Mets will just spend $400 million…
Would you spend $100 million or would you spend $180 million?
MLB has no interest in Seattle winning when NY or LA winning will bring 5 times the ratings, merch sales, etc.
Ok well if your conspiracy theory is true then it’s worked cause I’d much rather be a Dodger fan than a Mariners fan. #MucktheFariners
Some of these owners paid ridiculous amounts for their teams after the last wave of owners saw valuations 10 fold. Its always seemed like a bubble to me
@Dock_Elvis Why would there be a bubble when there remains high demand for MLB team ownership? Liberty Media which owns the Braves has their books open for the franchise. It’s not like prospective buyers are not doing their due diligence before laying out $1B+ for a purchase. Forbes had the O’s valuation at $1.725B before David Rubenstein purchased them for the exact same cost.
Liberty Media is making their money away from the Braves in that Battery Project which is publicly traded I believe. That’s where the money is. Owners now want new parks with the real estate around it. Its why you’re probably about to see Sherman use Star Bonds from the State of Kansas to build a complex out in Johnson County. It’s tough to see a return like was had before. They aren’t buying low anymore.
Ricketts bought the Cubs and found out how expensive Wrigley is on infrastructure and has used that as an excuse to cap payroll.
To get free money now. Owners need to show actual job creation and taxable income around the parks.
KC tried this downtown in an area jammed up with hipsters who got very loud about their opposition in Jackson County.
Braves have a great model. Tampa will try to probably end up doing the same thing. Sell locally and they’ll get better govt reaction.
Money is in development.
Hmm. You all understand this is a business. Run to be profitable. A mid major market team like the Mariners operate within spending parameters…you all act like spending equals winning. Sure it helps. But baseball has more parity than the NFL. You don’t have to be desperate and go after aging free agents to win. The mariners have been close and it’s their performance on the field that defines making the playoffs. See their record in one-run games last year vs. their playoff year.
Bottom line- if they didn’t strikeout and leave runners on base. If there bullpen wasn’t weak, they would have made the playoffs.
It’s more than just money. Been a lifelong Mariners fan and we are never going to get high end free agents. More so, spending money doesn’t always equal winning. It’s an organizational choice to draft and develop and you all think the Goldschmidts and Alonzo’s of the world will save us.
The team makes 70-75 million a year in profit while increasing in value 12% annually. Pretty nice for a team dedicated to on-field mediocrity. It doesn’t have to be this way, they could easily sport a 200 million payroll . Yes, that extra 50 million would get them the extra 5 wins they need to play deep into October.
No- leading the league in strikeouts would have gotten us to the playoffs. Not having a weak front end bullpen would have gotten us to playoffs. You know how many WS titles the Yankees/Mets/Dodgers have combined in the last 20 years? 2 not counting COVID. Money doesn’t equal winning WS.
The Mariners did sign Robinson Cano once upon a time so they have played in the high end free agent market in the past. They just chose the wrong guy, character wise.
The M’s were a major bat from probabky making a World Series run for the first time. That’s worth something. Not just trying to back in.
The Mariners are NOT a mid-major market. They control the rights to all of Washington, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Alaska and half the Pacific Rim.
As Mariners, they control the seas as well.
All those states and regions combined don’t equal the population of southern cal and New York. Seattle is a NOT in the same league as those markets by any standards.
Sorry 40 fans in glendive Montana doesn’t pay $700mil for Soto.
Those rights mean they’re blacked out where they don’t even broadcast. Those rights actually have to pay $$$ to matter. No one is buying Mariners gear on the Pacific Rim outside the PNW
Steves 3, Dock_Elvis,
The 2024 population of New York State is 19,469,200 and when divided by 2 (Yankees, Mets) is 9,734,600.
The 2024 population of Southern California is 23,800,500 and when divided by 3 (Dodgers, Angels, Padres) is 7,933,500
The 2024 combined population of WA, ID, MT, AK, OR is 15,935,366
worldpopulationreview.com/states
The 2024 Western Pacific Rim combined population is 13,200,000
All those Ichiro Mariners Jerseys don’t count?
espn.com/gen/s/2002/0508/1380155.html
I’m sure the M’s have more fans than any other team in those other states. Once you leave the Seattle market, fewer people care about the M’s and their dominance decreases.
Like, I’ve been to a few Trailblazers games since the Sonics left, but that doesn’t mean I follow them very closely. And casual fans who might watch the Sonics regularly don’t care a bit about the Blazers.
Counting metro areas means little. By your estimate the Mariners would be valued above the Yankees. They are not. And not close.
Ichiro also sold those jerseys when Nintendo owned the team.
Huh? The Pacific Rim roots for the Giants and Dodgers too. More so, you assume SOCAL is divided eventually. Lastly, this is a dumb argument. My point was Seattle is not a major market by any standard even with the large geographic region it covers. No one agrees with you Martial.
I showed those numbers to illustrate my point that the Mariners have the equivalent of a large market revenue stream. I know they’re not as valuable as the Yankees or Dodgers or Mets, not even close.
I realize that the bulk of the people in the surrounding states aren’t Mariners fans, but of the baseball fans in those states, the majority are.
Many fans in the surrounding states travel to Mariner games, buy team apparel and gear, or watch at home or in bars on Root Sports. If you go to a bar in those other states and there is a regional game on, it’s a Mariners game.
Controlling those rights gives them a huge revenue resource unlike many teams which are confined to a much smaller region with closer competitors. No, they don’t have the resources the Yankees, Mets, Dodgers, Braves or Blue Jays do, but they have a lot.
And, don’t forget Forbes ranks them as the most profitable team in the league year after year.
Ichiro has remained actively involved with the Mariners since 2019. He still sells plenty of Jerseys, etc. especially with him being elected to the HOF and going in as a Mariners.
The Mariners could be spending a lot more and don’t.
si.com/mlb/twins/minnesota-twins-news/12-teams-che… cheaper teams include the,numbers from the previous season.
Easy to say when it’s not your money. And again, the point is, spending money doesn’t equate winning. Performance on the field does. Yes, trading for better players is a possibility if you think the regression is trending the wrong way. Certain players like Crawford need to be gone. But if the other young players perform at league average or better, they will be a playoff team. With diluted playoffs, realistically you need 86 to 90 wins to get WC spot. They are close and I don’t think it warrants overspending on marginal free agents since we’re not talking about signing superstars, the rest aren’t worth wasting money on and saving it for signing core players when the time comes…
It is my money. Yours, mine and every Mariners fan that spends money on the team in one fashion or another. So unless you’re listening to all the games on the radio…but still, if you’ve ever eaten out or had drinks at a bar in King County, then you’ve helped line their pockets by paying for the stadium along with the rest of the taxpayers.
Your argument sounds conspicuously a lot like Jerry Dipoto’s infamous 54% comments.
I do get your point that it’s easy to “spend somebody else’s money”.
My point is that we all have a stake in it. And fans that have been supporting this franchise and paying for their stadium deserve a better effort on ownership’s behalf to field a contender.
Martian- you seem like a smart guy. But you don’t understand economics or mutual business transactions. Once you make the uncoerced decision to buy a ticket, pay for Root Sports, or a Buhner jersey, your consumer power ends there. The transaction was fair, and they are free to spend however they want. And your free to not but a ticket or pay for Root Sports. Sorry, that’s the deal. Once that transaction is made with free will, you don’t get to tell them where to spend it. We are not shareholders. You want that? Go buy shares in the Packers.
“deserve” and “right” are two different things. I know we, as fans, have no legal say in how they spend their money. Yes, we all have free will to choose to buy or not to buy. I am of the opinion that we should not buy until they prove they are interested in bringing a WS title to Seattle. One way they can prove that is by not going back on their words, not making excuses and substantially upping payroll like they said they would.
I really don’t know where you’re pulling Forbes numbers that indicate the Mariners are the “most profitable team in the league year after year”. Just a simple research into 2024 says otherwise.
You lost me at a simple metro-region market comparison. You know who DOESN’T watch the Mariners on Root Sports? Anyone in their region with MLBtv due to the blackout rules.
Looks like the Yankees are valued at 7.15B of so as a franchise according to Forbes. Revenue and debt I’m guessing plays into that analysis.
To think that the Mariners are more profitable than the either the Yankees or Dodgers doesn’t even pass the common sense test.
That’s also not the Mariners opening up against the Cubs in Japan in a couple weeks. The Mariners absolutely don’t own the Pacific Rim.
blessyouboys.com/2024/4/19/24134946/the-business-o…
By best casual estimate the Japanese are more interested in Japanese players playing in the US more so than teams. There’s little doubt that wouldn’t currently make the Dodgers the Japanese “team” and it’s a marketing strategy OF the Dodgers currently according to ESPN
There’s actually Reddit questions answered by Japanese users just in this subject.
Of course Ichiro is popular. But to still call the Mariners the team of atleast Japan is far fetched.
I really don’t want to spend the time looking into South Korea. I’m guessing they’re also player dependen.
And I’d have to say the Dodgers/Yankees probably sell the most apparel on a casual basis to casual fashion fans.
Steves,
To further clarify my position, I am not advocating that they spend recklessly. I don’t think that would ever happen under Dipoto anyway. I really don’t care how much they spend only that it’s enough to compete for a WS title. I do , however hold them accountable to their own words.
“intend this team to win, have a winning record every season, be in the playoffs most seasons, and we will win a World Series.” John Stanton October 5, 2024
In regards to this quest for Seattle’s first baseball championship, Stanton confirmed a Seattle Times report from last month which stated that Jerry Dipoto will continue as the top decision-maker in the front office.”
mlb.com/news/john-stanton-addresses-mariners-2024-…
mlbtraderumors.com/2024/10/mariners-chairman-john-….
seattletimes.com/sports/mariners/mariners-ceo-john…
Their words don’t match their actions. Selling the fan base on a vision and a promise and then not backing that up with intentions is a classic bait and switch.
sports.mynorthwest.com/mlb/seattle-mariners/drayer…
sports.mynorthwest.com/wyman-and-bob/lefko-mariner…
seatownsports.org/p/the-mariners-arent-changing
The old bait and switch and us naive, gullible fans fell for it.
Dock,
Profitable in terms of net profit, percentage and several other categories, not gross total revenue.
king5.com/article/sports/mlb/mariners/mariners-mos….
statista.com/statistics/236206/payroll-of-major-le…
lookoutlanding.com/2023/3/23/23653560/seattle-mari….
You cited two articles referring to 2022. I’m not sure when these came out. Forbes tends to reassess their estimates as well.
From a simple fan standpoint….no one is cheering for the Mariners to top a Forbes list. And that’s why they have a generally apathetic fan base. Of the Pacific Rim matters….why not spend the money on a Japanese star? That would seem like a fairly sound financial decision. Problem is…they were too tight to follow up on Ichiro with more investment in Japan. Even Yu Darvish would have been a win.
The Mariners’ owners are running the team more like a business focused on making money than a sports team focused on winning championships.
And that’s why their fans need to pinch them in the wallet.
Imagine being a Pirates fan, very similar situation except half the payroll.
Stop the madness. The Mariners do not have great fans, and I’m one of them for 40 years. They don’t know the game and don’t support the team. They sell their tickets to anyone- any fan base can waltz in and dominate the stadium. The ones that do attend, perform the wave while the home team bats in the 8th inning. And then they wonder why the team can’t hit.
If you actually watched the team, then it was obvious that fielding, base running, and the bullpen cost 2024 Mariners 10+ wins. If you have elite starting pitching, but you can’t convert the soft contact into outs, you might as well have mediocre pitching. If you have a bad bullpen, it doesn’t matter how good your starters are.
Instead of chasing hitters, they should have elite contact, elite defense, and elite base running to pair with elite starting pitching- then they would have an elite home field advantage. Luckily, injuries and regression hampered the bullpen and I don’t expect that again. This team should be built like the 2015 Royals and all those SF champions. And until we stop selling our tickets and doing the wave WHILE WE HIT, then the fans should shut up.
Exactly. There are winning formulas other than spending large sums of money. Casual fans see other teams spend and say, why not us? All but 4 of 5 teams need to draft, develop and win within certain windows while players are controllable. Even sign their young talent to large extensions before they hit free agency (Witt, Acuna, Rodriguez, etc).
The Mariners left a lot of wins on the table by simply playing poor defense, striking out in critical situations, and having a weak front-end bullpen (see 1-run game w-l records). I’ve never seen a team SO in so many clutch situation where contact would have produced runs.
The Royals did this. The Giants did this. Draft and develop and add affordable pieces here and there. Mariners fans need to accept that our organization approach is what is it. Until you get an owner that wants to spend like Cohen, we have to accept winning within the windows given within the spending parameters. Sure, it’s frustrating, but the last thing we need to do is be desperate and overspend on Alonzo, Goldschmidt, etc. Guys who are aging and strikeout.
Here’s a hypothetically question to M’s fans. Let’s say we were able to sign a Harper, Judge, Ohtani, or Soto…does that one player who eats up all the resources guarantee a WS title? Harper has 2 titles, Soto 1, Ohtani 1, and Judge zero. More so, they all won those titles on stacked teams. It takes the right pieces, and we shouldn’t focus on one superstar because they are fun to watch. When we had Griffey, Rodriguez, Johnson, Martinez we won zero WS titles…free agency, superstars, spending does not equal WS titles.
Ok so fans should just be fine with mediocrity??? There’s absolutely no reason to support a team that thinks pocketbook first and not fans first that is a losing formula because I would imagine eventually the fans will wake up and demand better…But in the Mariners case they found the perfect patsy for a fanbase fireworks and bobbleheads equals big bucks!!! LFGM!
Yes, we do have to accept it. Their budget and operational strategy is out of our control. More so, if you drill down, our hitting, defense, and front-end bullpen is mediocre. If our current players just performed at league average, we would have made the playoffs. Spending hundreds of millions of dollars doesn’t equate to winning especially if it means Alonzo and or Goldschmidt.
Free agents are not the silver bullet. Performance is. Our situation hitting is brutal and no one is to blame except the players.
Steves 3,
It’s a good question you pose. We do have a stacked, albeit imbalanced team because we have the best pitching staff in the league.
You don’t honestly think having any one of Harper, Judge, Ohtani or Soto would add enough offense and protection to our lineup to make us WS contenders?
Of course they could help. But I am saying big numbers do not equate to winning WS titles. So much has to go right over the course of the season. We have the players, and they underperformed. Be patient is what I am saying. Hitting .224 as a team and leading the league in K’s is not a good recipe. Go after elite contact hitters, elite defense and a better bullpen and you can win titles in this league without the Ohtanis and Trouts.
That’s all probably true. But patience, for Mariners fans has long past. Our window is now. I don’t care how much or how little they spend. I care about them showing us they will do what it takes to field a WS contender, not more empty promises.
I hate to say that you’re right. I dont sense much heat from the Mariners fans…haven’t on TV or in person. I think they’d heat up with a winner like any team would. Definitely a football town..and crazily an MLS town.
I dont think the weather helps. I’ve frozen my rear off in there in August. And traffic probably doesn’t help. Drawing fans through traffic down into the south sound is a hassle.
Sell the team Stanton. After these comments by a current active player, this team will never be able to lure any players in the future, that are decent MLB talent players…hell, they really can’t even do that now before Turner’s comments. This franchise is doomed.
There’s plenty of reasons a free agent would or wouldn’t sign with Seattle, but to give Justin Turner that much authority is melodramatic and stupid.
When there’s somke, there’s fire. And there is a LOT of smoke with the Ms. Turner didn’t need to be given authority, he’s just the first one to publicly speak out about the dumpster fire this team ownership is.
Mariners fans are fairweather if they think these comments from an old Dodger justifies their complaints.
Sure, the Mariner’s fairly have under performed expectations. This wasn’t for lack of additions. as previous seasons they’ve made numerous deals which could’ve pushed them over the limit into the playoffs. However, they didn’t. The team re-evaluated and moved off from the manager and coaches. There was clearly some traction after this adjustment specifically from the offense in the areas they were struggling to improve.
Alone the adjustments to the hitting are enough to be a playoff team if all else holds up. Add in individual improvements from a litany of hitters, these two will have cumulative effect which boosts offensive production.
These will be much more effective than overspending on Alonso. The team has managed their budget and improved the team. And yet fans aren’t happy? Take into consideration as well the Astros are worse, the Rangers are a year older, and the A’s and Angels aren’t even close. The Mariners have got one year wiser and fixed up their weaknesses.
So the Rangers are one year older, yet the Mariners are just a year wiser? I don’t know why you’d expect improvements from a litany of hitters. Only three players from the starting nine are under 30 and the bench doesn’t hold much upside.
It isn’t literal. It highlights the Rangers core position players aren’t spring chickens and the age curve isn’t peak as it was previously.
The Mariner’s best players and most of their core are within 27-31 years old. Their best hitter hasn’t even reached his prime, so he definitely benefits from another year.
As for the concept of regression, the Mariners’ terrible ’24 is due for some positive regression towards the mean. Hence improvements, generally.
The Rangers have five expected starters under 30, the Mariners have three.
Of course the Mariners have a fantastic young rotation but this whole article is about the fact that they did nothing to improve the lineup, and you are downplaying that very valid criticism.
Mariners fans have a reason to be disappointed with a team barely missing the playoffs just running it back out and hoping for positive regression only.
Mariner’s players hit at the top of the lineup. Ranger’s at the bottom…
The criticism is ignorant. It misses the realities of the Seattle franchise’s situation. Mariner fans listening to this spoiled Turner are being led into delusions of free agents. It’s not a fair situation, but this offseason is hardly an issue. Especially if you consider the future when they let all those pitchers walk or they sell high before they lose arbitration.
The team only has positive regression and player improvement and the new better manager/coaches. If you are asking for more, you are being greedy in a mid market.
You know this to be true. But all this people who are crying about not spending don’t understand. Money doesn’t solve the problem of real time performance. As you stated, the performance on the field was so poor, and given the ages, there should be some improvement vs. regression. In fact, they were so bad how could it get worse??? Do they think signing Alonzo or Goldschmidt would have improved that? Both are regressing year by year, as most free agents do. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be free agents. They have the pitching to be competitive if they change their organizational approach to hitting, it will equate to 4 or 5 more wins. Which is enough to be a playoff team. Even if our top 5 hitters hit .240 a piece, it would equate to a few more runs. And that’s not asking a lot in this day and age of homerun or nothing.
All the teams in the division have gotten better EXCEPT the Mariners…
Except for Texas, who moved sideways, and Houston, who got worse.
And the Angels and A’s still not good enough to threaten.
They will have more losses to their division rivals because each team got better than they did last year. Even Houston, they’re gonna get their pitching back and walker and parades are not that much of a downgrade versus what they lost..83-79 at best
You don’t have to spend to get better. Players need to perform at least at league average. Our leadoff hitter Crawford hit .201…winning the offseason and getting better has little do with spending. How about situational hitting improvement.
They could have traded Luis Castillo and saved a lot of money while adding more potent offense. I thought sure as h*ll thought we were going to see them work a deal out with the Cubs.
It’s an interesting part of the economics of MLB. It’s not necessary, except for the highest revenue teams, to attempt to compete year, year out, to be profitable. If they can hold the line on spending, there’s more than ample cash. Sign a free agent for $20M, and that cash is gone–right out of the owner’s pocket.
The core that has led to 4 straight winning seasons is still intact. Plus they’re going to get full seasons out of Randy, Robles and Polanco.
The Seattle Mariners could win it all.
The M’s park is part of the problem. It’s quite possible that Dipoto has made competitive offers to hitters that don’t want to play there. T-Mobile is worst than Oracle for hitting, and J.D. Martinez rejected an offer from the Giants last season saying, he wasn’t going to play there.
I appreciate Justin Turner sharing what our Mariners players feel and most likely, would like to say publicly as well. Jerry Dipoto does sound like he feels it is a little unfair that everything he says is scrutinized, but he has put his foot in his mouth a few times, trying to protect ownership in my opinion. He could be better in front of the microphone at times. He says that most free agents were not a good match this year, well it seems like that very year, come on, but going the trade route, I don’t see how they could not have offered more to get Josh Naylor, shocked by what the Guardians received for him. The Mariners could have offered more than that and I wonder how many trade opportunities were missed in this offseason and that is on Jerry. That being said, our owner, John Stanton, is a coward. He sets the budget, he makes these financial decisions, or lack there of, and he needs to answer some questions, He owes that to the fanbase and perhaps more importantly to the players on tis team. If you are not going to sell the team then at least be a stand up person and answer some questions about what your goals are for this franchise and why you are going about things the way you are.
I was miffed that we couldn’t beat the Diamondbacks offer for Naylor, but Cleveland has their own pitching factory and sometimes teams just like a certain player more than others. Woo to Miller for Naylor would have been a massive overpay. Hancock might not have tickled their fancy, and that is pretty much the list of MLB adjacent young starters in our organization.
Arizona’s compensation pick was number 70. That’s what Cleveland was after. Seattle’s is 35. Sure, Seattle could have beat Arizona, but their pick has a much, much higher value, and then there’s the 10.9m salary for a lefty-hitting, defensively-limited player.
Naylor never made sense for Seattle.
And Hancock is far more valuable to Seattle than most other teams. He’s their sixth starter and they don’t have much starter depth.. He was never likely a part of trade discussions.
So they give 12 million for what is mostly a weak side platoon bat in Santana. He has hit over a .680 ops just once (.727 in 2023) in the last 5 years. The Guards are loaded with guys who kill lhp — Jose, Thomas, Fry, Noel, Johnathan Rodriguez — and virtually no-one who hits rhp. Strange move. Justin Turner at least had pretty even splits in his career.
Correct that, Justin Turner has EXACTLY even splits .821/.821 which is pretty amazing over 6000 PAs. It’s the one sure fire sign a right hand hitter will have a strong career, his ability to hit RHP.
It’s pretty tone deaf to actually tell your fans basically most teams make the playoffs and we kinda want to walk into that and get lucky. He has a history going back to the Angels of being kind of foot in mouth. He would walk right up to Mike Sciocia in Anaheim and go about making analytical demands in front of other staff and players. What’s crazy is he played the game. You don’t just go show your manager up…even if he’s wrong in some aspect.
Facts matter but so does delivery.
Didn’t the mariners have a lead in the division and had to play catch up after losses one year or two? A lineup shakeup or trade would have helped, imo. Turner is going to have a field day with the cubs gm & ownership.
The Mariners have a strong farm system and top 10 prospect base of trade candidates to work from. This great farm system couldn’t trade prospects for one truly legit team controlled bat. I find that hard to believe.
Trading from the farm system is the secondary option. Prospects had diminished value this offseason and Seattle needs help in the middle infielder and have a half dozen top 100 prospects almost ready to contribute there. So you get 1-year placeholders.
Could have packed Castillo to Chicago for Nico Hoerner and had more money to spend
.
Word is only the Marlins and White Sox were interested in prospects, but they have nobody. Arenado could’ve been a possibility, but his NTC takes that option off the table.
The trade deadline could be different, and they’d only be responsible for 2 months salary.
The article title threw me off a little bit. I was like Justin Turner is on the Cubs why is he talking about the state of one of his former teams
I’m guessing because he was asked about it.
As a 30+ year Mariners fan, it frustrates me that so many of my fellow fans don’t realize that the vast majority of criticism directed towards Dipoto should instead go to Stanton and ownership.
M’s fans love to handwave away the core team that Dipoto and the FO built through draft and signings. After decades of Woodward, Bavasi, and Zduriencik, I’m still insanely thankful we have Dipoto running this ship.
We just need new ownership that’ll give him more resources to work with!
True story time. The Mariners scouting staff had Mike Trout at #2 on their draft board, and Jack Z called them off to take a college bat with that pick. He then fell to the second of two Angels picks later in the first round. Angels used the second to help suppress his slot value. Yankees would have taken him with the next pick.
So, yeah….Mariners scouts wanted him #2 overall and the GM was trying to save his butt getting a high floor low ceiling fast mover.
I scouted the Midwest League for Colorado. This was a fun story we’d laugh about.
Their 3.49 earned run average was tied with Atlanta for best in the league. The starting staff’s 3.38 ERA was best in the majors.
=========================
That’s kind of misleading. Seattle if a huge pitcher’s park, so their ERA will always look good.
But their ERA+ was only 106, tied for 9th (thru 14th). Their road ERA was ranked 18th.
The pitching staff isn’t what it is made out to be.
Either are you, Joe.
Support for my Mariner bros from an A’s fan who knows what it’s like to not spend when you’re almost there…
That’s wild. Alex Bregman and Pete Alonso were the only two real fits in Seattle positionally and in terms of an impact bat. But you aren’t coming to Seattle on a short term deal hoping to build value, and 30 teams including the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees weren’t willing to give them long term contracts for a reason. Seattles plan this offseason was to allow what they have to develop and short term plugging holes until their crop of hitters starts graduating to the majors.
Yeah, whatever it took to get Alonso to Seattle would’ve been an absolutely terrible contract.
Sell the team, John. You don’t want to win, and we want to win.
Dipoto is not the problem: he just enables it by working within its constraints. Stanton is the problem. Spending big on a superstar like Alonso for 2 years is not a team-crippling move. It’s a two year contract. A team can recover if it goes wrong.
You’re supposed to try.
Dear: Mr. Dipoto. Please stop being a Dip and stop trying to build a perennial champion-caliber team before the good-pitching window closes. Just one “great” season very soon will be great. That means you will need to trade a couple of your starting pitchers since ownership isn’t willing to spend. Mariners can’t be like the Astros, which had/have consistently great hitters year after year. Mariners have no consistently great hitter, including J-Rod.
Turner isn’t wrong, though probably speaking out of turn commenting on another team’s moves.
The M’s may not have spent big but in the next couple of seasons you may see Tyler Locklear, Brock Rodden, Michael Arroyo, Jared Sundstrom and Lazaro Montes contribute to the big club
Maybe… that’s also when Cal, Kirby, and Gilbert are gone. So…
Why not JD Martinez for Seattle? A .893 ops in 2023 and statcast indicates he wasn’t that far off his game last year after a late start. Maybe he will sign for cheap. A better DH option than Haniger.
Plus I’m still looking for Brandon Belt!!!
We’ve been screaming for JD Martinez for years, but it will never happen.
Martinez refused an offer from the Giants because of the ballpark. Oracle is tough for hitters, but not as bad as T-Mobile, No way does he sign on to play in that park, unless he was completely blown away, or got no other offers.
If they fixed the batter’s eye and marine layer issues there that would fix all of this.
The only retractable roof stadium that stays open air with the roof closed. An extremely costly mistake.
“The club surely would have loved to add more offense but didn’t have significant resources to do so.”
Darragh they have like eight starting pitchers and 15 relievers ready to go (8 known-quantity relievers and 7 guys they’ll pull off of a scrap heap, one of the best parts of DiPoto’s tenure). You can’t look me or any Mariners fan in the eye with a traight face and give any of us a good reason why Brian Woo for *insert one or two less-than-3-months-to-MLB-ready Prospects in Baltimore* hasn’t already been done.
“I FEEL LIKE I’M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!!!!” -Jacobim Mugatu
Also, for the umpteenth time, Pink Pony Club Park or wherever they play (formerly SAFECO) would play like more of a hitter’s park if the home team line-up had more than 2 or 3 guys that are above average. Not impact, just above average. I think a 1B who knew how to swing a bat would go a long way.
See how Dodger Stadium plays like a hitter’s park because they have 2 or 3 MVP Candidates in their lineup.
The 2001 team had no trouble hitting there.
One year out of the last 24 doesn’t prove much.
The PF rank for the last 11 years (omitting the small sample 2020 season):
2014, 30th
2015, 30th
2016, 26th
2017, 22nd
2018. 20th
2019, 23rd
2021, 26th
2022, 30th
2023, 30th
2024, 30th
When the team has entirely different roster over those 11 years, and the PF is ranked last in half of the 10 seasons, with a 20th as the best result, it’s not the hitters, it’s the park.
I agree the park is a consistent problem for hitters. No doubt about that. However, the 2001 team that won 116 games proves that a balanced team, both built and managed for the park can be successful.
That 2001 team was pretty much an outlier. Clearly that team was absolutely stocked, and with virtually every guy having a good year. Of the starting 9, 7 had a bWAR of 3.3 or higher. Five had a bWAR of 5.2 or higher. Bret Boone had an 8.8 bWAR for that season.
Position guys had a combined 50.4 bWAR, and the pitchers totaled 16.8, for a whopping total of 66.4. By comparison, LAD last season had a 39.6 from position players, and only 6.9 from the pitching staff, totaling 46.5. The 2023 champs, Rangers posted a 34.7, and a 13.3 respectively for a total of 48.0. It’s just not that easy to assemble the kind of potential the 2001 team had, and then be lucky enough that everyone did extremely well.
Thanks for providing those numbers, Jean. I’ve seen them all before, but not in a long time and now you’ve made me sooo nostalgic for 2001 again. It’s always bittersweet though because of no World Series.
That 2001 team was awesome, and I remember that season well, I’m not an M’s fan, but do root for them, if they’re not playing the Giants. It was a huge disappoint for me when they fell to the Yanks. of all teams, in the PS. I think they’ll be better than fans think this season.
“That’s what we’ve communicated to our fans for a decade.”
After a decade of near misses, rebuilding, 1 fluke playoff appearance, then several near misses again, the fans know what you’re communicating., Jerry.
Miscommunication, or poor understanding of the strategy and its effectiveness isn’t remotely the issue here.
They didn’t think it was the right time to make a big move??? Your pitching rotation is best in baseball and cheap. You’ve got the best catcher and cheap. But NOW isn’t the right time?!?! Schmucks.
At least he knows nobody likes him.
Once again, the biggest problem in baseball is NOT the pace of game, or even ball/strike calls. It’s the fact that 50% of owners could care less about winning and unlike companies, there aren’t any boards of directors to keep these owners accountable. It’s never been more obvious who baseball is for; the owners, not the fans.
Signed,
A ChiSox fan trapped by Jerry Reinsdorf since 1981
SELL THE TEAM