Spring training is beginning to kick off around the league, and as is perennially the case, there are a handful of notable free agents still looking for homes. That's of particular importance for the group of starting pitchers who still remain unsigned. Over the years, we've typically (not always) seen late-signing hitters struggle less than late-signing pitchers. Starting pitchers, in particular, seem to benefit from a full, gradual ramp-up rather than the sort of accelerated build that inherently comes with a mid-March signing.
Nick Pivetta stands as the most notable starter who's yet to find a landing spot. He's surely been impacted by the qualifying offer that's hanging over his head. Any team other than the incumbent Red Sox would need to forfeit at least one draft pick (possibly two, depending on CBT status) in order to sign the longtime Boston righty. Others still on the market include veteran mid-rotation or back-end starters Andrew Heaney, Jose Quintana, Kyle Gibson, Cal Quantrill, Ross Stripling, Lance Lynn and Patrick Corbin -- just to name some. (A full list can be seen here.)
This time of year, there's plenty of talk about teams that still need to add an arm. That can take different shapes, however. I wrote about the Mets' rotation for Trade Rumors Front Office subscribers last week, but the Mets aren't necessarily the type of team that needs to go out and add an innings eater to step into the fourth or fifth spot in the rotation. They have myriad options there already. Any addition for them, presumably, would be a clear-cut playoff starter. It's a similar situation with the Orioles, Cubs, Blue Jays and many other postseason hopefuls. Other clubs, like the Tigers and Pirates, have a mostly set group with a bevy of interesting young, MLB-ready top prospects knocking on the door. Signing Quintana or Gibson to eat innings likely isn't in the cards for teams in either of these groups.
At this stage of the offseason, some of those available free agents might need to wait for a spring injury or a trade to create the opportunity they seek. But there are still teams around the league that are rather clearly in need of some steady innings in the Nos. 3-5 spots in the rotation. Let's run through some clubs that have the need and, as crucially, the budget (or lack thereof) to add an established veteran arm to the back of the staff.
Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription
- Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco.
- Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony.
- Remove ads and support our writers.
- Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker
I don’t have the subscription so I couldn’t read past the first few paragraphs.
But honestly everyone but the Dodgers and Phillies is probably worth mentioning.
Everything these days requires a subscription, what a SCAM!
ALL of them. Next question! Ahahahahaha!
I bet he regrets not taking that QO. He was a head scratcher to me for two reasons.. one getting one and two rejecting it. A guy who was a starter and then dropped to the bullpen to then get thrown back due to injuries and was league average at best does not warrant a QO and if given that gift shouldn’t of declined it.
Is this a rhetorical question mlbtr?
I said before Brewers badly need a starter. Even if it’s. not Pivetta, someone like Heaney, Clevinger, Gibson, or Quintana would at least help.
Guardians- contenders relying too much on a weird Ben Lively resurgence and inconsistent AAA guys
A’s- probably done spending but could use minor league deal depth arm?
White Sox- rehab value and trade
Astros- depth is scary, money?
Angels- logical fit for a starter
Braves- midseason trade makes more sense
Marlins- trade bait, but do they even care?
Mets- depth
Padres- no money
Rockies- depth, do they care??
Pirates- no annual old starter this year, don’t need one but trade piece or depth?