There’s a likely scenario in which the Rockies enter the 2025 season with a rotation full of familiar faces: Germán Márquez, Kyle Freeland, Ryan Feltner, Austin Gomber, and Antonio Senzatela. All five of those pitchers have been in Colorado’s Opening Day rotation multiple times before. Yet, general manager Bill Schmidt is not ruling out the possibility that one of the team’s young pitching prospects could supplant an established arm (per Patrick Saunders of the Denver Post). Accordingly, the GM says his team is open to the idea of moving a veteran starter to the bullpen to accommodate a fresh face in the rotation. On a similar note, manager Bud Black told Saunders he’s also open to some young pitchers making the team – as long as they’re ready.
As Saunders lays out, the three prospects most likely to wiggle their way onto the Opening Day roster are Chase Dollander, Carson Palmquist, and Sean Sullivan. Dollander, 23, is a consensus top-100 prospect and widely considered the best pitching prospect in the Rockies system. He looks like a future frontline starter with the upside to be a perennial Cy Young contender. However, it has been less than two years since Colorado drafted him, and he only has one year of professional experience under his belt. Thus, there’s a good chance the Rockies would like their star prospect to get some more reps in the high minors before they expose him to big league competition – at Coors Field, no less. To that point, Schmidt made it clear that the Rockies have no interest in rushing Dollander to the show. They will not consider calling him up to pitch out of the bullpen; he won’t be in Colorado until he’s ready for a role in the rotation.
However, director of player development Chris Forbes suggested that Palmquist, 24, could see his MLB debut out of the bullpen (per Saunders). The team still envisions him as a starter long-term, and he could still impress enough to earn a starting role this spring, but he could also see time as a multi-inning arm in the ’pen. The young left-hander is not as highly regarded of a prospect as Dollander – he looks more like a back-end starter than an ace – but he could be closer to the big leagues. The Rockies took him with the 88th overall pick in 2022, and he has quickly risen through the ranks of their minor league system. He has made 46 starts across four levels, including nine starts at Triple-A. In 27 starts between Double-A and Triple-A last year, he pitched to a 3.98 ERA and 4.43 FIP with an impressive 29.0% strikeout rate, although his 12.1% walk rate was rather high.
Sullivan, 22, was Colorado’s second-round pick in 2023. Most evaluators have doubts about his long-term prospects as a big league starting pitcher. Baseball America describes him as a “depth starter,” while FanGraphs sees him working in middle relief. However, the team at Baseball Prospectus included him on their list of the Rockies’ top 10 prospects, suggesting he could become a “highly efficient” number four starter. If his 2024 performance is anything to go off, that outcome certainly seems possible. Over 21 starts between High-A and Double-A, Sullivan tossed 115 1/3 innings with a 2.11 ERA and 2.83 FIP. Most impressive was his pinpoint control; he walked just 3.4% of the batters he faced. After a year like that, it’s not hard to understand why the Rockies will give him an extended look this spring.
As for which of Colorado’s veteran starting pitchers could wind up moving to the bullpen, Senzatela might be the most likely possibility. The oft-injured 30-year-old missed almost all of the last two seasons recovering from an ACL reconstruction and Tommy John surgery. His last productive season was in 2021, and even then, he failed to pitch enough to qualify for the ERA title. It would not be surprising to see him struggle in camp after so much time away, in which case it might be best for all involved to ease him back into an MLB role via the bullpen. Márquez is another name to keep an eye on this spring, considering he has also missed most of the last two seasons due to injury. He was durable and reliable for Colorado over the previous six years, so he is likely to have a much longer leash than his fellow Venezuelan right-hander. In other words, the Rockies are highly unlikely to move Márquez to the bullpen. However, if he needs to go back on the injured list, a spot in the rotation would open up.
rox will never win a WS
neither randy johnson nor walter johnson would help them in colorado let alone the crap they churn out in the rotation these days
denvers just not meant for baseball
Can you make a shoe smell?
if i stick it up your @$$ that might do the trick
lol violent reaction to a Caddyshack quote. Relax, keyboard warrior
There’s one player that could do this and one player alone and yes I’m going there. A 26 man roster of all 2004 Barry Bonds, Barry Bonds, and yes Barry Bonds.
The proof is in the pudding. The man doesn’t need a bat to be the best player in all of baseball.
Courtesy of the great Jon Bois.
youtube.com/watch?v=JwMfT2cZGHg
Either rebuild or compete. Pick one or sell the team.
Looks like they are rebuilding, with a few promising arms and one potential ace to work with.
Looks like rebuild as far as payroll. They have slid from 14th to 17th and now 21st. Makes sense since a lock for last and KB/Arenado kick-ins are baked in the cake. Should probably spend on player development efforts next few years and trade any vets/BP arms for whatever they can get like all bad clubs.
As long as 2.5 million people come to the ballpark every year, they’ll just keep doing business as usual. Either spend a ton of money, build a contender, and 3 million people show up, or spend nothing and don’t care and 2.5 million show up. The Rockies outdrew 15 teams last year (including playoff teams like the Mets, Guardians, Brewers, DBack, Orioles, Twins, Tigers, and Royals) despite 61 wins and no stars to draw fans. Rockies probably won’t sign another big free agent for the next five years, if not longer.
Do they think they have a 90 win roster again?
I would like to see a look at what plays up best in Colorado. Do they just need 15 Ben Joyces to have a real competitive staff? Why not try it?
Ubaldo and Aaron Cook were ground ball guys with hard sinkers. Jorge De La Rosa, oddly enough was one of their best pitchers ever, not sure if he got grounders too.
What type of stats would a Colorado pitcher have to put up to win a Cy Young? I would have to think voters would consider where they put up those stats.
Look up Ubaldo Jimenez in 2010. Finished 3rd in the Cy Young and 2nd only to Roy Halladay in WAR for NL pitchers. Started the ASG after a great first half in which he was 15-1. Was well on his way to the CY but was mediocre after the All-Star break so Halladay (and Wainwright who was arguably less deserving) passed him.
Here’s the list of all of the Rockies pitchers who have ever received a Cy Young vote, the year, and where they placed. Ubaldo came pretty close in 2010:
Marvin Freeman – 1994 – T-4th
Jeff Francis – 1 vote – 2007
Ubaldo Jimenez – 2010 – 3rd
Kyle Freeland – 2018 – 4th
Need to be at the top of baseball in GB% and whiff rates to win a Cy Young at Coors. With a healthy amount of good defenders and a fleet OF behind him. Tall order. Ubaldo had a lot of those things when he placed high in the voting.
I know a guy that can teach them the football slider
Boger Reshens?
At least you can’t complain they don’t spend. They just don’t do it smartly. Locked up 3 guys for their rotation who instantly got hurt and underperformed. Kris Bryant, exists.
They don’t really spend, though. especially recently. Their payroll for this year is going to be around $110-120 million, good for somewhere around 21st in the league. Next year, it might be under $100 million.
It should be like that though if they are rebuilding at the moment. Problem is team like the Pirates, Reds, Guardians and Brewers spend around that or less and are “competing”.
Considering the Rockies have gotten 10 starts combined from Marquez and Senzatela over the past 2 seasons i would probably be looking for other options as well
Worst organization in baseball….Yes worse than the A’s…
As opposed to what?