The market may be heating up for free agency’s top reliever. Jon Morosi of the MLB Network reports that Tanner Scott is weighing multiple multi-year offers and may choose his team by this weekend.
Morosi suggests that the Cubs are among Scott’s top suitors. Chicago president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer said this week that the bullpen is “probably the area we’ve been focused on most in free agency.” There’d be no bigger upgrade than Scott, though that’d be an out-of-character move for Hoyer’s front office. The Cubs have not signed a free agent reliever to a multi-year deal or a guarantee above $9MM in more than five years.
Sahadev Sharma of The Athletic writes that while the Cubs do indeed like Scott, they may be reluctant to meet the asking price. Previous reporting has suggested that Scott’s annual salary could approach $20MM on what’d presumably be a three- or four-year contract. Even if the money doesn’t quite get to that level, this would be a major investment. Scott should easily land the top reliever deal of the winter.
The Dodgers have been tied to Scott for months. After landing Roki Sasaki, a back-end reliever is the last box on L.A.’s offseason checklist. The Braves have also shown interest, while the Mets were more recently reported as a suitor. That no longer seems to be the case. New York agreed to terms with A.J. Minter on a two-year, $22MM guarantee this afternoon. Mike Puma of The New York Post reports that the Minter deal means the Mets are expected to drop their run at Scott.
Scott has been one of the best relievers in baseball for two seasons. He fired 78 innings of 2.31 ERA ball for the Marlins in 2023. The 30-year-old southpaw was even better last year. Scott earned his first All-Star nod and combined for a sterling 1.75 earned run average through 72 frames between Miami and the Padres. He averages nearly 97 MPH on his fastball and has punched out at least 28% of opposing hitters in three straight seasons.
Just get it over with and sign with the Dodgers already!
Signing news has been deferred to this weekend.
Now that Sasaki has signed Friedman will add to the bullpen. Scott will become the next LA Deferral
As long as there is deferred money then dodgers are the bet.
Los Doyers otra vez?
Si,Claro!
Dodgers gave him the green light to sign after getting roki
I wonder if the Red Sox are still in on him? Boston has one more big move left in its tank and it will either be the back end of the bullpen or Bregman.
Keep in mind that Boston did pay Kenley Jansen $16M per year two years ago, so stretching to $18M-$20M per year for Scott wouldn’t be unrealistic.
Probably not. They added Aroldis Chapman and Justin Wilson, have Hendriks and Fulmer coming back, Justin Slaten gets a spot and someone from the group of Winckowski/Bernardino/Kelly/Weisert will likely get a spot and then there is whoever doesn’t make the rotation/6th starter if they go with one and at some point Garrett Whitlock. Doubt they spend significant money on Scott at this point
They’ve gotten so many lefties this offseason, I expect him to go there
Neither. Sox are cheap players
Cubs please don’t waste 20 million per on a reliever of any kind. That would be a monumental waste of resources.
Found Jed’s account.
I wouldn’t give him that much annually but the Cubs do need a closer. That’s their only real weakness at this point. Maybe 15 a year for 3 or 4 years.
How about make a trade for Houston’s Ryan Pressly ?? I think he’s $12 mill per.
Yeah that might make more sense. Relievers are risky. Hoffman at 3 years 33 seemed pretty good but who knows what the medical records looked like.
Signing Scott would be the one thing that would make sense. Even if it’s an overpay. That’s why it’s not gonna happen.Besides Hoyer is Sammy Sosa’s driver this weekend. He can’t be bothered.
Why get a good closer when you can trade for a washed up one for 3/4 the cost? Intelligent spending at its finest.
pt57, I agree with your sarcasm. However if I’m the Houston GM, I’d keep the Cubs front office listed first on my speed dial.
Hoyer doesn’t get nearly the credit he deserves for building a strong minor league system through drafting and sometimes trades of veterans. But at the same time, the Cubs often greatly overpay with these prospects when dealing for short term, cheap help.
What’s wrong with Hodge? Sure they need depth, but I think he’s capable.
Chief, you are correct, Hodge looks very capable, coming off last season. Also Luke Little could be, as well. However the Cubs got caught short in the pen – and it’s be a crime to see that happen again.
Just sign Jansen to cheaper deal
They haven’t had a good closer since Chapman. The back end of the bullpen coughed up 20+ games last year. This is the exact spot they should be spending money.
That’s the Cubs. Max out the luxury tax threshold for teams that don’t sniff the playoffs. Manage baseball better. If you can get to the limit…it’s on you to be able to make wise decisions.
The Cubs have never really shown a major desire to build winners since the WGN era began. Always content to sell the Wrigley experience.
Can the league defer this Dodgers team 20 years?
I don’t understand the reference.
Dark – aww. Can’t we all just get along?
Wait aren’t you a Yankees fan?
Earl Weaver would have called him full pack jr, used to scare the crap out of me when he was on the Orioles!
Why does Roki want to be in Shohei and Yoshi’s shadow when he can go to SD and be the savior when Darvish retires in a few years?
Because the Dodgers are far more likely to win a World Series within the next few years than the Padres?
There’s the KD logic
What’s the KD logic
Go where they don’t need you to win. You can just ride coattails.
Reynaldo’s: He made his decision and it’s over. Your post is pointless.
If the Cubs land Tanner Scott, it justifies the Cody Bellinger salary dump.
They can also put it toward the “convince Tucker to extend for 400-425 mil fund”.
Sign with Dodgers he will. 66mil 3 years. Option for a 4th year if he reaches 100 or more saves for the first 3 years could be worth 90 million.
I don’t think you can make vesting options based on performance. It’s innings or appearances basically
It’s more incentives but you’re probably right. I’m sure the Dodgers would find a loophole somewhere.
It was also a joke because the league let’s them them 40 man rosters year round.
Dodgers might as well sign Alonso and Santander too
If he’s smart he’d sign a long term deal with the A’s, then once they move to Vegas it’s endless hookers and blow
If only he had a translator to gamble on sports/baseball, he’d have the full monty.
Thanks for the layup on that joke.
Yeah, he certainly couldnt find that in LA….
No worries LA D will sign him and defer his contract for 50 years and MLB commissioner will be happy.
Yup. That’s the deferral king of teams
I’d like the Cubs to do both. They wouldn’t need to give up much to get Pressly.
And, I hope they sign Scott. Now, is the time! Otherwise, what’s the point of trading good prospects for 1 year of Kyle Tucker?
Go for it, Cubs! The AL Central has weakened. Time for a deep playoff run!
It would be a major coup if the Cubs won the AL Central. Other than the benefit of playing the White Sox 13 times, I don’t see any advantage in going for it.
Do the Dodgers have a 52 man roster?
May as well they have unlimited funds…
No unlimited funds. They have over a billion in deferrals. By the time other teams get on board mlb will stop this financial loophole. Avoiding luxury taxes or decreasing it is going to be shutdown in the new CBA.
The Dodgers can just go give him 5/$100 and the rest of us can just sit back and watch.
I hope the Braves sign him to be the closer starting in 2026.
I don’t understand the logic in giving a guy 20 million a year for multiple years to be your closer. A lot of bullpen pitchers are way too volatile year to year for me to invest that much of a long term commitment for a closer unless his name was Rivera or Hoffman.
Regardless of need, rickets plan always to go to a pay a fixed amount and then that’s it and the player he needs goes elsewhere. Same with maddux years ago. Now, they’ll go after a couple aging has been Jansen or Robertson both righties and the will show happy faces to the fans and media. I’m sick of getting leftovers.
MLB so screwed up and the ticket prices so out of control and getting worse in this non competitive environment!
How many teams of 30 have any chance to go all the way?
Outside of the west and east coasts an the cus in the moddle, how many teams have signed Japanese players have signed with those teams?