As the Padres look to retool their roster ahead of the 2025 season, Dennis Lin of The Athletic reports that the club has entertained trade interest in both players that could reach free agency next winter and players under longer-term team control. In particular, Lin notes that the club has received interest in right-handers Dylan Cease and Robert Suarez as well as infielders Luis Arráez and Jake Cronenworth. It’s unclear whether or not the club is engaged in active negotiations regarding any of those players as things stand.
Cease and Arraez have both seen their names in the rumor mill frequently this winter, but Suarez and Cronenworth have been far less frequently discussed to this point. In fact, Lin himself suggested in early December that the Padres were inclined to keep Suarez at that point in the offseason. That the club has subsequently begun to entertain interest in the closer’s services is certainly worth noting. At the time, Lin relayed that Suarez’s trade value was complicated by the presence of an opt-out clause in his contract that would allow him to head to free agency after the 2025 season rather than receive $8MM salaries in 2026 and ’27.
Perhaps as the relief market has begun to develop, rival clubs have changed their evaluation of Suarez. With righty Jeff Hoffman landing a $33MM deal with the Blue Jays, veteran set-up man Andrew Kittredge securing a $10MM guarantee from the Orioles, and some reports suggesting closer Tanner Scott could land an AAV in the $20MM range this winter, it’s certainly feasible that the possibility of being on the hook for $26MM over three years if Suarez opts in has become more palatable. After all, Suarez’s 2.77 ERA in 65 innings as the Padres closer positions him as one of the better relief arms in the game and compares quite well with Kittredge in particular. With that being said, it’s also possible that the Padres have become more motivated to clear salary as the offseason has continued and are open to dealing Suarez even if the return is lighter than they would have accepted a month ago.
As for Cronenworth, it’s somewhat difficult to imagine the club getting a meaningful return for his services beyond salary relief. He was a perfectly serviceable infield option for San Diego in 2024, hitting a roughly league average .241/.324/.390 in 656 trips to the plate while splitting time between first and second base. That was enough to make Cronenworth roughly a two-win player according to both Fangraphs and Baseball Reference last year, a notable step up from 2023 but still well below the numbers he posted during his back-to-back All-Star campaigns in 2021 and 2022. With just over $72.7MM left on Cronenworth’s contract to be paid out over his age 31 to 36 seasons, the versatile infielder seems unlikely to be moved without the Padres eating significant salary or taking on another bad contract in return.
Interestingly, Lin suggests that the Padres would prefer to keep “at least” Arraez in the fold for 2025 out of those four names. That’s something of a surprise given Arraez’s hefty $14MM salary in his final year under team control and the fact that replacing him at first base could surely be done for much cheaper, thereby opening up payroll space to upgrade other areas. Even Lin acknowledges that Arraez’s pricey final year under contract could be an obstacle for San Diego as they look to retool their roster. With that being said, it’s possible that the market for Arraez hasn’t been especially robust. Few teams have been directly connected to the infielder this winter, and one rumored suitor was seemingly taken off the table when reports pushed back on the idea that the Yankees could have interest in acquiring Arraez to play second base for them in 2025.
However the club ultimately decides to go about moving salary, it seems all but certain they’ll need to make a trade or two before the season begins. RosterResource projects the club for a luxury tax payroll of just under $243MM in 2025, putting them about $2MM over the first threshold, with an actual payroll of just over $208MM. The club surely wants to duck under that first luxury tax threshold this winter, and previous reports have indicated that they want their final payroll to clock in below its current level while not necessarily dropping all the way back down to last year’s $169MM payroll. With clear needs in the outfield and rotation, it’s hard to imagine the Padres achieving all of their offseason objectives without moving at least one player due a significant salary in 2025, if not more.
CCooper8920
When the Padres lose out on Roki to the Dodgers my guess is they will trade Darvish.
CGG12
Nobody is trading for Darvish when he is under contract through his age 41 season.
chiefnocahoma1
I tend to agree. The Padres don’t seem to be in a place to send 8 figures in cash along with him.
padrepapi
After 2025 the Padres will owe Yu Darvish 3yr/46m covering his age 39-41 seasons.
Charlie Morton will have made 55m over those same age seasons. So Yu will be about 20% cheaper.
Charlie Morton had a wonderful career, but so has Yu. Not to mention Yu has 8+ pitches and has the distinction of the being the big league starter in the history of the game who needed the fewest starts in his career to reach 1500 K’s, beating Randy Johnson by doing so in around 10 fewer games.
With the going rate of pitching and Yu’s attributes he’s so low on my long term contract concerns in Padreland that I don’t see him being traded.
CGG12
That’s all true. But very few teams can afford to take a 3/46mm gamble on an aging pitcher. That’s why Morton has received multiple 1 year deals.
Not to mention the full no trade clause that Yu has.
The idea that Yu will be traded is just unrealistic from the previous commenter.
wallabeechamp
Take a look at the difference between starts & innings pitched for Charlie & Yu over the last three years. Feel free to keep believing that nonsense you spouted afterwards, but understand why knowledgeable fans roll their eyes at your post.
websoulsurfer
The word but means that you think that what came before it in the sentence or phrase is not true.
In other words, you don’t believe your own statement that it is all true.
towinagain
Preller will make lemonade out of lemons.
VermonsterSD
To be expected, can always find a good closer for way cheaper.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Like Jason Adam or Jeremiah Estrada? LOL
FanDan
Uh yes
websoulsurfer
That is fluff. Name them.
FanDan
They need a catcher desperately. Suarez to Pittsburgh for Endy Rodriguez would be a good start. You are not going to convince Sasaki to come to SD to pitch to Campusano. Rodriguez has good behind the plate skills.
Jizzrael
Pirates wouldn’t do that. The salary is too high for them and the two player options aren’t attractive to any team for a mid-30s reliever. Padres would have to eat almost all of it and throw in another player to get Endy.
FanDan
How many Catchers does Pittsburgh need? Still going to use Bednar?
Jizzrael
Why wouldn’t they stick with Bednar? What is attractive about Suarez for them? They are more than 2 years away from being competitive and he’s not a bargain. Also you can’t have too many catchers. And you can trade them for something better. Rays are probably calling Pittsburgh weekly.
websoulsurfer
You really don’t follow the Padres at all do you? Preller has not made the mistake of trading for a catcher that was anything other than a good defensive catcher since Nola. He won’t do it again.
Endy Rodriguez will probably not be a good defensive catcher going forward. At least not for a while. He had surgery to his throwing elbow in November of 2023, he was shut down in his rehab in September and has not returned to baseball activities yet, and there is a chance he will not be available at all to start 2025
If you think Campusano won’t be a big part of the Padres catching corp in 2025, you missed the reason for his slump last season and why he barely played after being sent down.
Campusano was hit on the left hand, the same one he had surgery on in 2023, by a swing by the dodgers Will Smith in May. He went on the IL for soreness to that thumb in June but played with that injury the rest of the season.
FanDan
justbaseball.com/mlb/how-the-pirates-can-capitaliz…
websoulsurfer
Your point?
From the article – “Endy Rodriguez, a former can’t-miss prospect whose shine has faded in recent years.”
FanDan
Keep reading.
FanDan
mlb.com/news/padres-2025-position-breakdown-catche…
Heels On The Field
Why would the Padres care about “dropping under the threshold” of the luxury tax? Especially the first level.
Their problem is since the one good owner they ever had died those in charge now are committed to getting them back to what they had always been, a west coast version of the Bob Nutting Pirates.
Moff_Nick
Tbf, the padres don’t even know who their owner will be next year. But besides that, a lot of padres fans were ready to move on from Suarez after he had a bad final month of the season.
websoulsurfer
No Padres fans I know of were ready to move on. Where are those fans?
davemlaw
Cronenworth makes a lot of sense for the Mariners.
Seattle needs to shed a bit of salary too but Cronenworth first then shed Haniger with a prospect and both teams will look better.
FanDan
OK with moving Cronenworth, but that would have to a hell of a prospect if you want to offload Haniger.
mark1623
Been saying the Padres should trade Suarez for a while given the payroll constraints but that opt out is killer.
FanDan
He will be an FA next year. That needs to be built in. No way he opts in with a pay cut in 26.
mark1623
Unless he’s injured, in which case it’s $16 million of downside.
FanDan
Yeah. No need to put that 26th ranked payroll in any jeopardy of going up to 25th risk free. Good luck with Bednar and their 4 catchers.
Lefty_Orioles_Fan
I would not mind having both Suarez brothers on the Orioles
FanDan
Call AJ now. Lines are open.
Moff_Nick
Looking at their grim long term payroll outlook, I’m not sure how much longer preller can rob Peter to pay Paul before it needs to get torn down.1 year, maybe 2?
EM41
I agree. The Padres have so much money owed to aging, declining players. That, plus the ownership controversy dim the Padres’ future. I’m amazed that Preller is still GM. Seems to me he’s made too many mistakes.
padrepapi
They’ve set attendance records each of the past three years and season tickets are all sold out in 2025.
Their payroll was a good 100m lower then the teams that were right behind them in attendance.
They definitely have a lot of future commitments, but they also have a ton good going forward. Getting Salas and De Vries to pan out to go with Tatis and Merrill would be huge filling two key positions cheaply.
Tatis and Merrill will be 26 and 22 next season. Hard to think of a better duo in Padre history at similar ages with long term control.
Teams that are selling out 50 times a year are in better shape then the Padres are getting credit for.
foppert3
If things are as tight as being indicated, the selling out thing is bad. Not good. Put a big red line through driving some revenue through increased attendance. The only way to do that when you already sell the place out is to increase the prices. Out of curiosity, are ticket prices increasing in Padre land ?
wallabeechamp
Tatis gets paid like an MVP caliber shortstop. Problem is he’s ’only’ an all star caliber right fielder.
Darvish, Cronenworth & Boegarts contracts are underwater, crippling a once promising future.
But, the place sells out & the ownership is making money hand over fist.
Yay!!!
RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame
Feels like one of AJ’s mega trades is coming.
blues1967
I wonder if the Padres window is closing. They had a fairly solid year in ‘24, finishing not far behind the Dodgers, then swept the Braves and just missed upsetting LA. Now they’re talking about cutting payroll and ducking way below the tax line. So now they’re further behind Los Angeles and Arizona seems to have passed them for sure. If they get rid of all or some of the guys they’re talking about trading, do they have enough to hang in the intense NL West?
mark1623
They don’t have enough as is even before payroll-reducing trades. Preller is going to need some pretty miraculous trades to pull another rabbit out of his hat like he did last year. Just so hard to be moving quality major leaguers while looking primarily for guys who can help now.
padrepapi
They had their 2nd highest win total in 2024 in their 55 year history. All after cutting payroll by over 80m from the season prior and losing some serious talent. So calling it a fairly solid year doesn’t quite sum it up.
To think they would hit 6 homeruns against LAD in LA (tying a single game playoff record) and having them on the ropes to going 2+ games without scoring was a harsh end to an amazing season.
Baseball can be funny. Not unlike the Dbacks going to the World Series one year and then missing the playoffs the following year (despite scoring the most runs in the league).
mark1623
They definitely could have won the WS last year but it’s hard to see the path from here. Holes in the rotation, catcher, left and somewhere in the IF depending on where everyone lands. With the desire to actually cut payroll it’s even harder to see how it works. Sasaki feels like an absolute necessity.
Last year we nailed the Soto deal and we need something similar with Cease this time around
wallabeechamp
What a sunny picture you’ve painted!!
In reality, the ‘success’ of the Pobres season is based on finishing the season in second place, winning two postseason games against a bunch of randos dressed in Braves uniforms & winning two more against a team with a 2.5 man rotation.
So, that totals out to 4 of the 13 victories required for a WC team to be crowned champion. Less than a third of the way…
vpsd
where are you seeing it reported that they want to be “way” below the tax line.
no where.
RyanD44
Here’s something that is kinda telling to me:
Padres payroll/avg attendance rank:
2024 – 15th/4th
2023 – 3rd/3rd
2022 – 5th/5th
2021 – 6th/3rd
2019 – 24th/14th
2018 – 25th/18th
2017 – 28th/18th
Despite spending more $ and seeing a huge upturn in attendance (as much as 33% increase from pre Covid #s) they still don’t see value in spending more $
ChetLemonaid
There needs to be a third column labeled “results.” Spending with no return normally has a negative effect.
In my opinion, teams have 2 options:
1) Spend and try to compete every year with at least promising results.
2) Rebuild with a promising group of young players/prospects. This also needs promising results. Either by the team or the kids.
The In-between is where most teams fall flat. A few high-priced players mixed in with being cautious with younger guys’ service time.
Heels On The Field
I’ve been following MLB for over five decades. Almost every owner not named GEORGE Steinbrenner refused to see the positive correlation of spending more to succeed overall.
Over and over again I have witnessed owners producing results as you just wrote but reaching the conclusion that they needed to slash the payroll and giving reasons through the media – who backed the ownership 100% – that made no sense.
foppert3
You really think they don’t see it ? George was the only one ?
How about they see it, but their team’s finances don’t allow them to do it ? Is that not the most logical thing going on here ?
Baffles me that fans just flat out refuse to acknowledge that teams have budgetary limits. There is so much evidence pointing to that. Just gets ignored. Super weird.
Heels On The Field
What is “super weird” is you not seeing the bloodsucker looting the market his team controls when it’s right in front of you.
foppert3
Who are you talking about ?
websoulsurfer
Translation. “Teams have called the Padres about Robert Suarez and Preller listened to their offers even though he has ZERO intention of trading him.”
But that is not as much of clickbait and no one would read an article with an honest headline.
wallabeechamp
More like, ‘ AJ is 1000% backed into a corner and desperate for anyone to take about $15mil off his books.’
But you won’t believe that until ‘the teams says so!’
BEISBALL
I called, The Padres will end up like the Tigers after Mr ilitch death. Owners like Seidler and ilitch are the exception, not the rule, this is the beginning.
Cincyfan85
Padres the next 5 years: 3 massive contracts, Jackson Merrill, and AAA/AAAA players to round out the roster.
Heels On The Field
If this is their way forward the next thing is the baseball “writers” claiming the Padres have “financial problems” the details of which will forever remain unpublished and they need to move Machado, Tatis etc.
In a few years the Padres will be back to sub $100 million payrolls and not one “writer” will ever mention the $240 million plus payrolls they ran previously.
It’s truly a wonder how these baseball “writers” forget such facts.