The Mets are looking to add a reliever or two, reports Will Sammon of The Athletic, with left-hander Tanner Scott identified as one specific name they have interest in. Scott is one of the top free agent relievers and has also been connected to Atlanta, the Yankees and Dodgers this winter. Sammon adds that the Mets have already met with Scott, likely over phone or video.
Scott’s appeal is obvious in the numbers. Over the past two years, he has tossed 150 relief innings, allowing 2.04 earned runs per nine. His 10% walk rate over those years was a tad high, but he struck out 31.3% of batters faced and got grounders on 50.4% of balls in play. He also added 5 1/3 innings of scoreless postseason work over those seasons, which included four strikeouts of Shohei Ohtani in last year’s NLDS.
At the start of the offseason, MLBTR predicted Scott to land a four-year deal worth $56MM, but it’s possible that will prove to be light. Essentially every starting pitcher has surpassed expectations this winter and that could spill over into the bullpen market as well. It was reported this week that Scott has enough interest that a deal with a $20MM average annual value is a possibility.
For the Mets, this represents a different tack to their rotation-building strategy, something that Sammon notes in his report. While owner Steve Cohen has seemingly unlimited financial resources, president of baseball operations David Stearns hasn’t gone for the top free agent pitchers.
Last year, he gave short-term deals to starters like Sean Manaea and Luis Severino, but the Mets were entering something of a reset year in 2024. After they outperformed expectations and made the playoffs, it was speculated that Stearns could get more aggressive and go after arms like Corbin Burnes, Blake Snell or Max Fried. Instead, he has re-signed Manaea, is trying to convert Clay Holmes from the bullpen to the rotation, and has taken buy-low fliers on guys like Frankie Montas and Griffin Canning.
While that pivot to more aggressive spending didn’t happen with the rotation, perhaps it will come to pass with the bullpen. Stearns has never made huge financial investments in relievers, neither for the Mets nor the Brewers, as shown on MLBTR’s Contract Tracker. The deals for Holmes and Manaea top the list, followed by an early-career extension for Freddy Peralta, who eventually emerged as a viable big league starter in Milwaukee. No other reliever has received more than a $5.4MM guarantee from Stearns.
Last winter, as mentioned, the Mets were going into a year of uncertainty. Stearns gave modest deals to a number of relievers like Adam Ottavino, Jake Diekman, Jorge López and others, none of them even getting a $5MM guarantee. The interest in Scott suggests that the Mets might have some willingness to pivot from that trend in the coming weeks, though time will tell if they actually follow through.
If they do, Scott would be a great fit for the bullpen. The Mets have Edwin Díaz as their closer but things are fairly open apart from that. José Buttó, Reed Garrett and Dedniel Núñez project as some of the top options beyond Díaz but none of those three have even two years of big league service time. Danny Young is the only lefty reliever currently on the 40-man roster and he still has less than a year of service time. Slotting in Scott would bolster the group in terms of talent, experience and left-right balance.
According to RosterResource, the Mets are projected for a payroll of $280MM this year. That’s about $50MM shy of last year’s Opening Day payroll, so there could be lots of room to add bullpen help, even if they end up re-signing first baseman Pete Alonso. RR has the competitive balance tax number at $277MM, which means the club is already within striking distance of the third threshold of $281MM. However, they have blown way past the fourth and final tier in previous seasons, so that isn’t likely to be an obstacle for them. As a third-time payor, the Mets will face a 95% tax rate for spending beyond the third tier and a 110% rate for anything above the fourth.
James123
unless this is a long and lucrative deal for Scott- if he is expecting to sign another deal later on- he wants to be the guy closing games- and with diaz it is not going to be him closing games. I am sure another big market team will get close to matching the money and will give him a clear shot at closing games.
Simm
Maybe but I’d take Scott over Diaz…everyday of the week.
horaceallen
Depends on if Diaz can get back to 2022 form. Not likely he ever gets to that level again but man he was good.
LordD99
That version of Diaz will show up on occasion but I don’t see it happening over a full season again.
rct
“That version of Diaz will show up on occasion but I don’t see it happening over a full season again.”
I don’t see why not. He was almost unhittable in 2018, 2020, and 2022. In between he was pedestrian (2021, 2024) or even horrible (2019). In other words, he’s bounced back several times in his career already after lackluster seasons. No idea what to expect from him, but if he was absolutely dominant again, would you be that surprised?
Ma4170
To be fair, i think he was better than pedestrian in 2021. He was actually pretty dominant aside from a few blowups that inflated the ERA. Diaz is better than scott, not sure how thats even a conversation. Scott had a year and a half that rivals diaz and thats about it.
ChrisLex
And you’d be the only one who’d take Scott over Diaz.
horaceallen
Money talks. Man, that pen could use an arm like that.
Pete'sView
$20M a year on a multi-year for a Closer. Yikes.
James123
if he signs with the mets- it may be 20 million for a set up guy.
VonPurpleHayes
Scott is a closer. I don’t see him taking a setup role, but money talks.
RunDMC
Why have 1 20M RP when you can have 2? What’s the worst that can happen? Is Edwin playing in WBC in March…?
metsin4
He’s had 20 saves twice in his career. He’s more of a high leverage reliever that will be used whenever the high leverage is. Diaz has become the same way. One could pitch the eighth and the other the ninth depending on who they are facing in their lineup.
VonPurpleHayes
It’s simply a matter if either would agree to that role. Some relievers hate that, but like I said, money talks.
Canosucks
Sign Scott and or Hoffman and then get Bregman and let the Polar Beer Walk and wind up like Conforto.
Tired of waiting for him.
Soon as he went to Bore Ass they should have walked away
James123
yep- big power one trick ponies like alonso should not get long term deals– sure throw 30 mil at him per year, but do not go more than 2-3 years…. you just never know when he will lose a hair on that swing and have nothing else. he could be another chirs davis (he has already been good longer, but that is what happens when a power hitter only loses a little bat speed)
VonPurpleHayes
It would break my heart to see Hoffman on the Mets, but it makes a lot of sense. Hoffman really found himself. He’s so good, but he did express that he really wants to close out games all things considered. He’d also consider starting again, but his preference is to close. Heyman started a rumor that Hoffman wasn’t happy that the Phillies went out and got another closer last year, because Hoffman wanted that role, but you never know if that’s just a rumor.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
Stearns is too smart to throw $20 mill a year at a reliever even if it isn’t his own money.
dasit
with that rotation they’ll need every bullpen arm they can get. don’t think scott is worth what he’s asking but if cohen is willing to spend it stearns should take yes for an answer and pull the trigger
rct
I agree. I think they’re just keeping tabs on Scott in case his market dips at all.
metsin4
He isn’t getting 20 mil a year from anyone.
Ma4170
Agree… but do the mets go 3/48 on a guy whos had 1.5 great years and many duds?
James123
i think he still gets north of that- if he wants 20m, he is getting a 1 year deal at best. I think for 3 he is low 50ies.. no one is going past 4 years- and at that he is likely only getting 60m at best…. he is actually a reasonable guy to get a 3 year at 45 that is front loaded with an opt out after 1 (like 19m for year 1, 15m for year 2 and 11m for year 3) to a place he will be the guy (closer) and test the market next year with a full season of being the monster closer (with a fall back if he is not- sinc small sample sizes can be killer)
YankeesBleacherCreature
So sign Griffin Canning to a guaranteed deal and sign a ~$20M set-up man? Ok.
JohnnyUtahSmells
Ok.
metsin4
Is there something wrong with signing Canning as your 7th starter?
mostlytoasty
While I don’t think Scott has a problem being a setup guy, if he’s getting paid close to $20 mil a year, the team signing him is signing him because they want a closer.
xpensivewinos
Montas was a “buy low” guy? Waaaaaaaaay overpaid for that stiff.
JohnnyUtahSmells
Either you don’t understand what “buy low” means or you just wanted to spread negativity.
Damn Yankee$
If the Mets run their current rotation out this season, they better find as many high-quality bullpen arms as possible.
metsin4
Their rotation will be a top 10 rotation in baseball. They are deeper in the rotation then anyone not the Dodgers.
Damn Yankee$
Weed must be legal in your state.
metsin4
Let’s see. Senga career ERA is 3. Manea had a 3.47. Peterson had a 2.90. Holmes projected low to mid 3’s. Montas has a career era of 4. Yes that sounds like a horrible rotation. They have the depth of Blackburn, Canning, Meggill, Butto and two outstanding prospects in the minors. Yankee fans are just pissed because we took Soto from you.
VonPurpleHayes
Senga’s injury history is significant. You can’t overlook that. The Mets are missing a reliable ace, which will hurt them down the stretch, BUT I don’t think the Mets are done. I think by the time the season starts, the Mets rotation will look very solid.
ChipperChop
@metsin4 having a lot of guys that can throw a baseball off a pitchers mound does not = deep rotation. Every team has a lot of rotation depth pieces that can pitch to a 4.5 to 5+ era like Megil, Canning, etc.
metsin4
Do they have guys like Blackburn, Butto, Sproat and Tidwell. That’s a very deep depth.
James123
not really- look at guys like Gibson who we know will throw to a mid 4 ERA and eat innings- he gets 8-12m every year (there are a bunch of guys like him). Teams need even below average innings from the back of their rotation. Average team uses 11-12 starters in a given season- so that 7th man up may end up with 20 or so starts (perfect world your top 4 get 35 starts, and your #5 gets 21…. but one of those 4 will miss half the season- 1 will play poorly- and the rest are likely to miss 4-5 starts due to aches and pains or a short stint on the injured list).
So you need your 5-8 guys to throw well enough to keep you in games- and teams value that at about 8m per year if they have a good track record of staying healthy and giving you 5 innings each start.
Queen Soto
Huge Mets fan here and couldn’t disagree more, it’s a rotation FULL of question marks that needs A TON to break right to even field a rotation equal to last seasons. Montas is trash, his only stretch of 15-20+ starts of good value is clouded by a PED suspension. Holmes while I HOPE works out is a complete wild card who albeit a small sample size hasn’t worked as a SP and had a shaky year in the pen last year. MeGill & Blackburn are liabilities more often than they provide any kind of value. Manaea is a rock I agree he’s a very strong asset. Senga CAN be a GREAT asset but the Mets put stipulations in his contract for a REASON regarding his health, his initial MRI showed lots of wear and tear to the shoulder & especially the elbow. Peterson while I root for him and he had a “good year” last year he was also very lucky with that almost 1.3 WHIP if you watched the games he needed MULTIPLE double plays EVERY game to avoid complete meltdowns and he was fortunate to get them but can you really count on that happening again? He should have been a sell high candidate in a deal for someone like Castillo. Mets rotation isn’t even closest to 2nd best in the NL your dreaming.
VonPurpleHayes
I agree with your points. The Mets rotation isn’t even the 2nd best in their division let alone the league. All that could change with a signing or trade though.
metsin4
You can’t say the Braves rotation is better than them. Strider will miss half the year and who knows what you get when he comes back. They lost Fried and Morton from last year and haven’t filled anything.
PiazzaParty
Yeah? Sounds like something you Yankee stans were saying last year too. It worked itself out but thanks for concern.
don_mossi_ears
The 10% walk rate caused me to search for what is mlb average walk rate for pitchers and Google AI tells me 7.7%. Plus Scott’s career walk % is 12.6 per Baseball Reference, so a possible area of concern.
AgeeHarrelsonJones
Don-Mossi –
According to GROK2. the walk rate for relief pitchers in MLB is 14.1%. Wonder
If that’s a hallucination? Or maybe Google is wrong?
depletion
I didn’t check your numbers, but, in general teams will accept a higher walk rate with a reliever compared to a starter. Pitch counts may be one reason.
James123
most releivers also have a higher strike out rate- average guy gets almost 2 mph on their fastball coming out of the pen (and only needing to throw 20 pitches vs 90).
Have you seen the K/9 for some of the elite RP- north of 10, if you are striking out a thrid of the guys you face- you can walk 1 in 20 more.
LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedForBeingABaseballExpertAGAIN)
Sleepy Stearns isn’t signing Scott. Higher chance that they resign Ottavino or sign some reliever that you never heard of. Dollar Tree David always thinks he is smarter than everyone else. Hope he doesn’t choke on his toothpick
JohnnyUtahSmells
DUMMY SAYS DUMMY THINGS WITH NO EVIDENCE OR EXPLANATION BUT IS GENIUS BECAUSE SAYS SO
LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedForBeingABaseballExpertAGAIN)
@JohnnyUtahSmells I am a genius, a baseball genius. Its ok Mrs. Stearns
PiazzaParty
Maybe you’re a genius, but likely not, based on things you say.
For ex: on a post about overpaying $20M for a set up guy and on the heels of signing the biggest contract in sports history you called him “Dollar Tree David”.
I have a feeling that you sat back after writing “Mrs Stearns” with a smug grin feeling so self-satisfied like you just pulled off the cognitive accomplishment of a lifetime.
Meanwhile the rest of us just look at your sexist comment and realize your brain is a hamster on a wheel.
You’re so useless here. Just find something else to do this is so sad.
JohnnyUtahSmells
Yikes
DigglinDickers
As much as I want him in LA, I don’t see Friedman ever paying an arm coming out of the pen 20 million a season.
Captainmike1
Lets see if the signing stupidity continues and players get more than they deserve
PiazzaParty
Google “free market”
jvent
Sign Scott, Sasaki, Alonso, Winker and Iglesias, than trade McNeil and Marte for relievers
mlbnyyfan
Still don’t think Manaea, Holmes and Montas leading a rotation scares anyone. The Mets finally have a deep farm system. Go get that number one. Until then. Yankees still own New York.
Reyday
Mets are 12-6 against the Yankees since 2021, you might want to do a little research before you start spouting off. Also you are forgetting Senga who’s a borderline Ace.
depletion
Sounds intriguing. Diaz can’t close out every win. They have to plan on winning 100 games or so (not saying they are going to, but that should be the plan given the offseason signing). Diaz needs days off too. Atlanta is going to be better in 2025, so I can see several points in the season when they have a string of close games with a contending team. Those are the times having 2 closers can make a difference. And, yeah, the starters don’t look so great at this point.