Tanner Scott remains unsigned as the top reliever in a slow-moving free agent class. The hard-throwing southpaw and right-hander Jeff Hoffman have been the best bullpen arms available all winter.
There hasn’t been much recent chatter on Scott, though that doesn’t appear to reflect a quiet market. Chris Cotillo of MassLive reports that the All-Star closer is expected to receive interest from multiple big-market teams. Cotillo’s MassLive colleague Sean McAdam indicates that Scott could receive something like $20MM annually on what would surely be a multi-year contract.
The Dodgers have been most frequently linked to Scott. He was reportedly on the Yankees’ radar before they orchestrated the Devin Williams trade. The Athletic’s David O’Brien adds another team to the mix, reporting that the Braves have done background work on Scott. Cotillo indicates that the Red Sox are exploring the top of the reliever market generally, though that report doesn’t firmly link them to Scott in particular.
If Scott were to hit the $20MM AAV marker, he’d join rare company. As shown on MLBTR’s Contract Tracker, there are only two relievers who have signed for that amount — and those each come with asterisks. Nick Martinez accepted a $21.05MM qualifying offer from the Reds this offseason. That’s a one-year commitment and Martinez is capable of starting. The only reliever to land $20MM+ on a long-term deal is Edwin Díaz. He signed a five-year, $102MM extension with the Mets two seasons ago. That came with upwards of $26MM in deferred money, though, dropping the net present value closer to $93MM. By that measure, Díaz’s true average annual value could be in the $18-19MM range.
By measure of NPV, Josh Hader set a new standard for reliever contracts with his five-year, $95MM term last winter. Hader has a longer track record than Scott, so it’d be a surprise if the latter got five years and an AAV around $20MM. A four-year deal should be in play, though. MLBTR predicted Scott for a four-year, $56MM deal at the beginning of the offseason. McAdam’s report may indicate that the bidding has pushed beyond that number.
Scott brings rare velocity from the left side. He averaged 97 MPH on his four-seamer and sat in the 88-89 range with his slider. Scott has topped 70 innings with an earned run average below 2.50 in consecutive seasons. He fired 72 innings of 1.75 ERA ball with a 28.2% strikeout rate between the Marlins and Padres last year. Scott added 4 1/3 scoreless frames with seven strikeouts in October, including a handful of punchouts of Shohei Ohtani during their Division Series matchup with the Dodgers.
The price tag complicates the Braves’ pursuit but doesn’t necessarily rule them out. Atlanta’s only free agent activity this offseason has been a trio of low-cost split contracts. They’ve rearranged the Aaron Bummer and Reynaldo López contracts and offloaded the final two years of the Jorge Soler deal. Whether that’s to reallocate payroll space to a major acquisition or a reflection that they’re simply working with a tight budget remains to be seen.
President of baseball operations Alex Anthopoulos said at the Winter Meetings that the Braves weren’t wedded to staying below the luxury tax threshold. Atlanta has paid the tax in consecutive seasons. RosterResource estimates their CBT number for next season around $218MM. That puts them $25MM shy of the $241MM base threshold. They could sign Scott and remain narrowly below the tax line. Atlanta could lose A.J. Minter to free agency. They’ll be without Joe Jiménez for most or all of next season. Bummer, Pierce Johnson and Dylan Lee project as the top setup arms in front of closer Raisel Iglesias.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
If Scott was repped by boras then there would’ve been a ton of Jon heyman reports by now…
Yanks4life22
Heyman broke down on a local NY sports show bc the host made a joke about “Arson” Judge it was pretty funny/sad at the same time. He should hang it up it’s time.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
I thought it was because the sports guy made a joke saying that heyman was employed by boras
kiwimlbfan
Do you have a link, or can point me in the right direction? I’d love to hear it. It’s a bit like all the soccer agents saying Barcelona is interested in their clients
Heels On The Field
No, it was not a joke. The WFAN host accused Heyman repeatedly – berated him – about fronting for Boras and basically being an undercover Boras employee or shill for him.
It was an on-air hit on Heyman’s credibility. It was way over the top.
Heyman said he was never going on WFAN again. It was on Twitter.
Yanks4life22
I didn’t hear the lead up to it I just heard Heyman break down. At first I was laughing bc I despised Heyman over the years, coincidentally bc he is a shill for Boras, but I truly felt bad for him in that moment. And still feel bad bc he is being turned into a meme at the end of his career.
VonPurpleHayes
WFAN has fallen apart and turned into a “shock-jock” station. The comments on Heyman were way out of line. He was attacked for virtually no reason after coming on to do the station a favor.
I grew up on WFAN, but it’s an absolute clown show now. It’s more 90’s Stern than sports radio, which would be fine if it didn’t advertise itself as a sports station.
LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedForBeingABaseballExpertAGAIN)
@VonPurpleHayes I 100% agree with you. Outside if Evan Roberts, the station has become unwatchable. Its in a sad state compared to the legends that they used to have. Who wants to listen to Sean Morash or Keith McPherson on their drive home from work? I sure don’t. Boomer and Gio almost put me to sleep on the road in the morning. They don’t talk about sports anymore and its supposed to be a sports network
Yanks4life22
It’s unfortunate. I’m driving a good chunk of the day so I always had WFAN on even if it was just background noise. Now I can’t even do that with these hosts.
It really has gone downhill since Mark Chernoff retired. I wonder what really went on behind the scenes that led to this cast of hosts.
towinagain
Thank you “we want to draculate the Padres for every dime” Seidler brothers for not allowing the Padres to be apart of retaining Scott.
Tanner Scott would be a great addition to say, the Padres.
Seidler Brothers are running this team into the ground and by the time they are done with thus team it will resemble the 2013 Padres(look em up).
ThatsIT?
Spending doesn’t equal winning. They won nothing and lost money spending and signing a bunch of free agents they had no business signing. Time to start a new direction of shedding salary. It’s hilarious fans don’t even know how to be a proper fan. Should take pride in wanting cheap homegrown players. Shouldn’t want the expensive shiny objects but nobody ever called fans smart
towinagain
Dodgers spent a billion dollars and won a WS.
VonPurpleHayes
The counter argument is that they had playoff runs, and ended up losing to teams who spent more or close to equal amounts. So, spending kind of does equal winning.
Lindor's Bodyguard
Hey town. Two words:
1. Xander.
2. Bogaerts.
towinagain
Prefer to replace the Seiders with new ownership as their direction as you stated @thatsit is a firesale.
Smelly_Cobb
I’m pretty sure the Seidler Brothers are dodger fans. Makes sense.
13Morgs13
I was really hoping the Phillies would take a run at him. Seems unlikely
Never Remember
No reliever is worth $20 million a year for pitching 60 innings. Better to get to or three others for that price.
freddiemeetgibby
Eric Gagne in his prime is worth $20mil
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Gagne on steroids?
Longinus
Freddie, indeed you’re right about prime Gagne being worth that money. Not only was his per inning quality utterly dirty, but he was also a lock for 82.1 IP every year. Shame that he needed to cheat to do that, but man was he something.
baseballfreak25
Technically he wasn’t cheating. The players not juicing were the cheaters. Prove me wrong when pitchers, hitters, hell, even the managers and coaches were juicing to hear MLB explain it.
Lindor's Bodyguard
baseballfreak is now the smartest guy on the internet. That’s some 5D chess thinking there.
gbs42
“The players not juicing were the cheaters.”
What a bizarre statement.
I’m not going to try to prove you wrong because the burden is on you to prove your statement. Good luck with that.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Quite possibly 6D Hungry Hungry Hippos.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
I wouldn’t say no reliever is worth 20 mil a year… Emmanuel clase, Ryan helsey…
But tanner scott is not one of those people
HalosHeavenJJ
Dude is filthy.
I’ll go out on a limb and say Mets just because they have unlimited money.
Attystephenadams
Mets already have a $20 mil reliever in Diaz, which is one more than Stearns wants. Since most relievers are inconsistent from year to year, Stearns doesn’t believe in giving them big money. Instead he acquires multiple low cost guys on one year deals who induce light contact if they can’t strike hitters out. If they don’t work out he just cuts them and tries someone else.
Dorothy_Mantooth
I read on X recently that a major national MLB journalist had the Red Sox in the ‘firm lead’ to sign Tanner Scott. This just goes to show you really can’t trust any of the rumors out there until a player agrees to a contract. Think about all of the Corbin Burnes speculation and then Arizona signs him out of the blue.
We have no idea where Scott is going to sign and for how much either.
Ragnarok
It’s probably because of all the innings I watched him throw in Baltimore but I would be terrified to give this guy $20MM for 3+ years.
I would not be surprised to see him have a year or two with absolutely terrible control.
hoof hearted
Scott’s resume isn’t worthy of $20 m
dano62
If Scott gets $20m per, with all the other options out there, I’ll eat my hat.
Big whiffa
I doubt any one left is getting what they hoped for at this point
AG7
Yep. Market is cooling off and the closer spring training gets, the less guys will take. Pitchers esp will be more anxious without a contract after the year Monty had and the early season for Snell.
Dorothy_Mantooth
I’d rather pay Yates at age 38 $12M-$15M for one year vs paying Scott $20M for 4 years.
Zippy the Pinhead
If that’s the price, somebody’s going to pay it.
metsin4
I don’t see him even getting lose to 20aav.
Captainmike1
Only a fool would,give him 20 a year for multiple years
Big whiffa
Then Mr T would pitty them
Lindor's Bodyguard
Pity?
Skell 2
2 good seasons- the guys not worth $20 million per year. Just like Profar. was overvalued for 1 good season. whoever pays these guys 20 million is insane….
cwsOverhaul
@Skell 2: You are not kidding. Every offseason there’s a handful of BP guys whether high leverage setup role or closers who log a ton of appearances for couple years of strong quality …..and then their effectiveness is immediately shot from it. Could be way off, but Scott looks like the posterboy for that sort of club regret in ’25, let alone a high 8 figure guarantee 4-5yr deal.
PiratesFan1981
In Breaking News, unexpected change in Tanner Scott market. Pittsburgh Pirates are to sign Tanner Scott to a 4/45 million contract. There will be mutual options in year 3 and 4.
Hahaha, it’s a joke.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
Oh you had me there for a sec
ThatsIT?
Does milkwaukee sign a bunch of free agents every year? No therefore the pirates shouldn’t need to either. Spending doesn’t equal winning. If your team can’t make the playoffs without signing Free agents the gm doesn’t deserve the chance to spend in free agency. It’s a simple as that.
Lindor's Bodyguard
Yup. Milwaukee has switched out its POBO, field manager and virtually the entire player roster in the time Ben Cherington has accomplished absolutely nothing in Pittsburgh.
Heels On The Field
It had better be. The Pirates need guys who can hit. GuyS, plural. Like two 140 OPS+ guys and a couple 120 OPS+ guys.
flyinhawaiian
Although I don’t think it’s gonna happen, I’d love to see the Dodgers sign him just to see the meltdown comments on this site!! It’ll be great!
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
It would be nothing compared to a Sasaki signing though. The servers that house MLBTR will melt down if Sasaki goes to LA.
Niekro floater
If Roki chooses Dodgers all hells gonna break loose on MLBTR. All kindsa wildness.
Lindor's Bodyguard
With 90% deferred. Don’t forget the best part.
Unclemike1526
Look he’s good, Would be a perfect fit for the Cubs but not at those prices. If that’s what he’s waiting for, He might be waiting a long time. Hoffman wants 38 million or so. SOLD!
Drasco0366
Agreed but a guy can want all he likes, actually getting it is another story completely.
I’ve never been too high on Scott because of his ridiculous walk rate. Truth be told, I’d rather take a calculated risk and sign LeClerc over Scott because he’d be a 1/10th if the price and carries the same upside. Honestly, JLC is Hoyers wheel house so I’m surprised the Cubs have not been linked to him.
Acoss1331
Hoyer is not signing Tanner for 20 million a year and I can’t blame him. What Hoyer does need to do is kick the tires on Hoffman and maybe see what Andrew Chafin is looking to get.
belowme29
Come on Dodgers, what are you waiting for. All we need is him and Sasaki to complete this year mission.
johncoltrane
Mets should sign tanner!
olereb
I love MLB and I love College Football, I love both with a passion. I do not like free agency and the NIL. Both are ruining the game. The Dodgers, Yankees, and the Mets have unlimited amount of money, it’s just sad. Teams like Miami, Milwaukee, Minnesota, Oakland, and more, do not have the money and can not compete for the most part. Was watching the Gator Bowl and Duke did not have a qb, the one who started I think threw one pass for the year, but announcers quickly pointed out they have a qb that has transferred from Tulane and all it cost them was 8 million.
desertball
D May will be converted to a reliever (much like E Gagne) and will be setting LAD save records by the time his career is over
Rww59
Bluejays 5yr100m sounds good to me
AG7
I don’t think he’ll actually get 20m so Braves need to do this ASAP.
citizen
Braves just resigned Eddy Alvarez. Was having a down 2024 season and even lower winter league. minor league deal