Kirby Yates has passed his physical and agreed to a one-year deal with the Dodgers, according to multiple reports. The Beverly Hills Sports Council client is guaranteed $13MM and could unlock another $1MM in bonuses — $500K each at 50 and 55 appearances. The team has still not officially announced the signing.
Yates becomes the latest big acquisition in a huge Dodgers offseason. He’s their second marquee pickup in the late innings. Los Angeles signed Tanner Scott to a four-year, $72MM pact with deferrals not long before agreeing to terms with Yates. The Dodgers had also retained Blake Treinen on a two-year deal earlier in the winter. They’ll join Michael Kopech, Evan Phillips and Alex Vesia in what should be one of the game’s best relief groups.
Scott and Yates were arguably the two best free agent relievers, at least for the upcoming season. The 37-year-old Yates (38 in March) was never going to match the three-year terms for Jeff Hoffman and Clay Holmes, but he’s coming off the best platform season in the relief class. He turned in a sterling 1.17 earned run average while striking out nearly 36% of batters faced for the Rangers. Yates went 33-34 on save opportunities while firing 61 2/3 innings — the second-highest workload of his career.
Emmanuel Clase was the only reliever in MLB who was definitively better. Yates finished second behind Clase in ERA among relievers with 50+ innings. He was seventh in strikeout percentage. Yates placed in the top 25 in swinging strike rate (15.2%). Opponents had no success against either his 93 MPH fastball or his mid-80s splitter.
That was Yates’ second utterly dominant season. As a member of the Padres in 2019, he led MLB with 41 saves while turning in a 1.19 ERA across 60 2/3 frames. His next three years were essentially wiped out by injury, as he battled elbow issues and underwent his second career Tommy John procedure in March 2021. He returned to throw 60 1/3 innings of 3.28 ERA ball for the Braves in 2023 before signing a $4.5MM deal with Texas last winter.
Yates becomes the ninth free agent reliever of this offseason to sign for at least $10MM annually (not including swingman Nick Martinez, who accepted a qualifying offer from Cincinnati). He trails only Scott in average salary, though that’s obviously in large part because his age limited him to one year.
The Dodgers are well into the highest luxury tax tier and pay a 110% tax on any spending at this point. They’re investing $27.3MM to add Yates to the back of the bullpen for a year. RosterResource calculates their luxury tax ledger around $382MM — more than $70MM higher than any other club’s projected payroll.
Los Angeles will presumably announce the signing within the next day or two, which will require a 40-man roster move. That could be a simple DFA, though it’s also possible they trade from their bullpen. They’re planning to run a six-man rotation, which means they can only carry seven relievers.
Scott, Yates, Treinen, Kopech, Phillips and Vesia seem locked into six spots. Neither Anthony Banda nor Ryan Brasier can be optioned, so one of them would probably be squeezed out if everyone’s healthy on Opening Day. USA Today’s Bob Nightengale reported last week that the Dodgers were marketing Brasier in recognition of the forthcoming roster squeeze.
Bob Nightengale of USA Today first reported last week that Yates and the Dodgers had reached a tentative agreement, pending a physical. MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand was first to report that Yates had passed the physical and signed a one-year deal. ESPN”s Jeff Passan was first with the $13MM guarantee and $1MM in incentives, while Fabian Ardaya of The Athletic specified the $500K bonuses at 50 and 55 appearances. Image courtesy of Imagn.
They going to have to dfa someone or trade someone fast
Uh oh better warn them! I’m sure the front office has no idea
Braiser getting traded at some point!
If that was the case Koobs, I think we woulda seen it already.
Source: me, and Idk anything.
There’s a AAA reliever named Dreyer on the 40 man. Seems the likely victim. Get’cher waiver claims ready, bottom feeders!
Is that for reals? I’m don’t know that’s why I’m generally asking lol. But it’s unlikely going to be him. It has to be either Banda or Brasier since the team can’t carry more than seven relievers and both these two don’t have any options. Hopefully Brasier gets traded, but if not I think he’ll be the DFA victim.
Has MLB announced yet if they’re going to let the Dodgers have as many people on the active roster as they want?
MLB announced the dodgers could have 35 man roster going forward
So mlb is decreasing the 40 man roster for the Dodgers?
35 per game, 50 man roster. Just for LA.
(Note: I’m a Dodger fan, but I think I understand the feelings of fans of other teams. I also don’t think MLB would be much fun if it became like the Premier League, where only a handful of teams ever have a realistic shot at a title, even if it turned out that my team were one out of that handful.)
MLB may end up like how the Premier League frontrunners were scheming towards a Super League.
MWeller I’m also not hating on the Dodgers or their front office. They are playing within the current rules. The issue is obviously the system. There has to be a deterrent strong enough to reign in the spending from any particular team.
Bring in Relegation and I’m all for it
They can buy as many roster spots as they need
rparker – Every other team could have easily beaten the $13M offer from the Dodgers, especially my team who claimed they were searching for another reliever.
The Dodgers are the team that put their money where their mouth is, that’s not something worth complaining about.
Fans of other teams that could have used Yates are the ones who should be complaining ….. about their own team.
So true Fever but will never happen.
It would not make good financial sense for many teams to offer that contract to a 38 year old relief pitcher with a recent history of major arm issues. The Dodgers are simply stockpiling assets and it won’t matter to them if his arm goes south.
@Landini
right. Never mind the 1.17 ERA, the 33 saves and the 36% whiff rate from last season.
Land – He had one injury that was resolved with TJS in early 2021. He worked his way back in 2022 and had two solid seasons in 2023/2024 which put the health concerns to rest.
Here’s the big picture which Flaherty further confirmed last week, there are too many teams content with simply contending for the final WC spot. The watered down postseason expansion has removed the incentive for many teams to try and actually win a championship.
Five teams – nearly half of the postseason field – didn’t even manage to win at least 90 games last year.
Two teams got into the postseason with just 86 wins, neither team should have qualified.
I have zero sympathy for teams that are prioritizing lower payrolls over trying to win.
He went 3 years, 2020 thru 2022 and threw a total of 8 innings. It makes absolutely no sense for a smaller market team to make that investment in a relief pitcher as old as him. I see you don’t like having 86 win teams make the playoffs. Perhaps what we should do is divide the payroll by the number of wins and let the best teams in that category make the playoffs, lol.
Land – The guy needed and had TJS surgery, which takes time to recover.
He was fully recovered after 2022 and has been stellar ever since.
You think $13M is a large amount for a small market team? Did you not see how much the Athletics just gave Severino? Did you not see how much the Orioles gave O’Neill? How much the Pirates gave Chapman? How much the Twins gave Correa?
With all due respect you have no concept of MLB contracts and the spending of MLB teams.
Correct, I don’t like mediocre teams making the postseason. I want only the best teams competing in the postseason.
It’s not the amount that troubles me, it’s his age. His velocity is not what it used to be. Again, unless you are a team that is guaranteed to win big he is not an investment that a small market team should make. Also, I would hardly use Correa as a poster child for a good signing.
Today’s signing of Kahnle by the Tigers is more cost effective than signing Yates would have been.
You get what you pay for.
Nicely put.. it is insane a MLB team can’t sign a reliever to a one year contact , at that salary or even a tad higher. If owners are that broke, which is BS, sell the team. Who owns a business to lose money? Owners are content not to spend and this Dodger bashing is absolutely unfair . They are not supposed to get the best players they can to try to win a title and win as many games as possible ? They are to feel sorry for other teams and pass on a player to give that team a fair chance to get him? Yankees came out recently and said how hard it is to keep up with the Dodgers, come on, what a load of crap. Owners are content to not spend and then cry about the Dodgers.
Players are investments. 37 year old relievers make more sense for a team for the Dodgers who need to overstock on pitchers because so many of them were on the IL last. They can afford to spend 30 million per year on a 31 year old pitcher that has only thrown over 130 innings once in the last 4 year. That type of investment makes no sense for a small market team that isn’t guaranteed to win 95 to 110 games based on the talent they have accrued.
@84leFlore – here we go. Thanks for being so predictable, you and those who will follow you.
They will be signing vivek ramaswamey as bat boy for a cool million ( 2 mill for lux tax purposes )
They get September all year
Lots of money, not that it matters to them.
$13m for a guy coming off a 1.17 season is a lot of money? lol ok
You don’t need 2 closers, arcefaces!
2? They have 6 closers.
Yeah, but how many *shortstops* do they have???
Ask AJ Preller who wins championships, pitchers or shortstops… He’s wrong.
Last year 13 guys recorded saves for the Dodgers 5 of which recorded multiple saves. So if my math is right, they now have a complete bullpen of guys who can close
SALARY CAP!!!!!!
Tell that to the Kansas City Chiefs
Yeah, that’s why a team in Kansas City and not LA or NY is the best team in the NFL.
Because of a salary cap.
Right.
And the reason the best players in the NFL play in KC and Buffalo and Baltimore, etc. instead of NY and LA like they do in MLB is because of….
A salary cap.
KC invested in the right QB and head coach and Dodgers invested in the right GM, players and strategy to own the Japanese/global market. You must not be a fan of capitalism.
MLB is literally trickle down BS and crony capitalism.
Are you a fan of trickle down and/or crony capitalism?
Who is a “fan” of capitalism?
Did Mahomes spend his rookie deal in KC and then leave as soon as he could to make bigger money in NY or LA?
Oh, right, no…he signed an extension to stay with the team that drafted him.
Because the NFL has a salary cap and any team can compete on a level playing field.
Unlike MLB, which is a trash league one step above WWE where only the big market fans who want to pretend they won something don’t realize it.
PS- Houston is the 4th biggest market in the US.
Capitalists.
MLB will never be like the NFL in that capacity because if you have a solid QB he controls a lot of the game, you don’t have that in baseball where one guy even Ohtani couldn’t get the Angels to the playoffs once.
Define crony capitalism. We will wait.
And national media
probably everyone who’s lived without it
@C-Daddy Most jabbering right-libertarians.
@fox471 Dave In any case, this isn’t “crony capitalism,” it’s State Capitalism, where the capitalists own the state, own both major parties, and through those parties administer the state for their own benefit. .
Name any one billionaire….
How about I show instead tell, since you got Google and all…
In the past two months, Elon has almost doubled his wealth.
Why? Did he invent something new? Did one of his companies finally make a profit?
No.
The market believes his newfound political connections will result in so many favorable govt. contracts and regulation it has literally bet trillions that cronyism will prevail.
So, they understand it.
I don’t watch baseball. TTO mixed with WWE, no thanks. So, I have no rooting interest.
You are clearly a fan of a team whose mom bought them a World Series and want to pretend you actually won it.
Sure you did, Champ.
Yeah, and in baseball the defense gets the ball
Why are you on this chat then? You don’t watch baseball. You are clearly here to be a lame troll cause you have nothing better in your life. Go find a friend and do something.
Capitalism is OK in everyday life. However, to simply buy a championshipb by out spending everyone is bad for baseball
Baseball doesn’t have to doom itself.
But it will so long as the “Mommy bought me a trophy” crowd is happy.
So, enjoy.
Is your problem with competitive balance… or just with large markets?
3 of last 4 Superbowls, 7 straight championship games, salary cap really brings parity
And let’s not forget how New England was dominant for so long..
The success of the Chiefs is hardly an indictment of the salary cap. No one is arguing that a salary cap equals parity. Rather, it enables teams in small markets like Kansas City to keep their best players and sustain winning. If Patrick Mahomes was in MLB the Dodgers would have poached him by now.
Which creates parity, C.
@ C-Daddy Poach? Poaching is an illegal activity. The Dodgers have operated completely within the rules and for you to imply otherwise is dishonest and misleading. Do you call all the teams that sign free agents poachers? Or are you just biased because your favorite team shows little commitment to winning?
Any team in any market has the chance to do it. That’s the parity. The opportunity.
But also those refs are helping out KC. That’s another story.
@Zerbs63 No one wants ‘parity,’ which is the wrong word for what the NFL creates—which is simply a fairly level playing field, much more level than that of MLB.
A 3.3 WAR relief pitcher was available two weeks before spring training. This is a problem for the leauge not the Dodgers
Salary cap? Because he passed his physical? Interesting perspective.
I don’t understand where you think a salary cap will help? They are deffering like a billion in salary for later… a few years ago the Houston Astros were the evil empire, before that the Yankees. Now we’ve got LA…
At least we all know when the Cowboys lose America wins!
BS, owners need to stop sitting on their wallets.
Which part? The fact that people with money don’t spend it hurting the poor even more? Or that they’d rather watch middle class who pays for their product grow disgusted with their efforts? Either way seems very counter productive, but I’m not a millionaire or billionaire so what do I know about economics
Does every Dodger get an interpreter to take the fall for them and do they count towards the tax threshold?
Get over it, old guy.
Does every Oldguy take lessons on sounding stupid? Or is it just you?
Considering the amount of times you bring this up, and you’re a Cubs fan, Oldguy58, do you have a bone to pick with Ohtani because he’s Japanese?
Oh good, the Chicago hater checks in.
I’m interested to see who goes. This should be a deadly bullpen.
I’m predicting an update to this thread saying half or more is deferred.
The update is deferred too
Avg Age Dodgers 26-Man Roster: Old AF
out of all the hater comments, this is the only one that is unequivocally true.
Worry more about your profile pic
I still remember people complaining the A’s paid Leclerc too much. This is just the way the market is right now.
The Tigers should have been offering BP pieces (Vest, Lange etc) to pick up superfluous prospects….Ferris and Hope didn’t cost the Dodgers much.
Go Tigers!
Brasier is likely the odd man out…
Rob Manfred answers to the Dodgers.
Now that you bring it up, I think I may have seen his name on their 40-man.
Ryan Brasier traded to Angels.
The Angels lol
Wait.. The Angels drafted Brasier? Why don’t I remember this..
As long as the Dodgers only get cash back, im ok with this trade.
Definitely didn’t want my dbacks to get him. Old and to much. But for dodgers if it goes wrong they buy more. That’s the difference
200 million for Burnes and Greinke but 13 million for an older reliever is where you draw the line lol.
My man that’s one ace every 10 years and only cause Corbin gave us a discount. And yes if you know the game there’s a huge difference between an ace and an aging reliever. Hazen has to be smart and invest well. Dodgers just open up the bank
I have to think Yates could’ve gotten a better deal than this.
lol
$13MM???
$27.5 to the Dodgers.
@cbraves Seems remarkably low for a guy coming off Yates’ year. Surprising that the Mets don’t seem to have been on him while he was in the 1/13m neighborhood. They can definitely use at least one more big arm in the pen, he doesn’t block anyone, and despite his age he won’t be dragging the team down in 2026+ thanks to the one-year deal.
Is going over the last LT threshold and pushing a pick down 10 spots really that important?
Add Kike n call it a “W” for this unbeleivable hot stove season. Go Dodgers !
There’s no room for Kike.
There would be if he wasn’t such a clown and stopped swinging like he was Babe Ruth.
Go ahead and try to argue that he’s NOT a difference maker in the post-season.
“One of” the best relief staffs? lol
They can carry eight relievers if Shohei Ohtani is one of the six starters.
Ah, good. Maybe this will finally get them over the hump.
THIS JUST IN: Who haven’t the dodgers signed? Good lord
Soto, Fried, Burnes, Adames, Santander, Alonso, Bregman… The list is long…
Injuries have a way of thinning out pitching staffs. Look @Dodgers, were running on fumes w/only cpl starters left as they took ’24 WS. Plus there’s wink wink nod nod thespian “injuries” to help stash depth by hiding players on IR. Think it was Confucius who said, “U Can Never Have Too Much Pitching.” Was him or Ron Peranoski.
Feels like they’re going to win every regular season game 9-0 and cruise to another WS win
please stop dodgers
Don’t tell Tim he’ll have a fit
Someone sign the Illiches up for the Dodger class in “How to run an MLB baseball Team”.
It’s a sad day in Mudville…..again….
Holy Toledo!
You coulda hired the Superfife.
You coulda had a V-8!