7:15PM: The Cubs’ offer to Scott was a four-year deal worth $66MM, according to Jon Morosi.
5:43PM: Carlos Estevez ranked 22nd on MLBTR’s list of the offseason’s top 50 free agents, making him the top reliever left available on the market now that Tanner Scott, Jeff Hoffman, and Clay Holmes (who signed with the Mets as starter) have found new teams. As one might expect, Estevez’s “market is intensifying,” MLB Network’s Jon Morosi reports, with the Blue Jays and Cubs among the teams in on the 32-year-old righty.
Toronto’s interest in Estevez was first reported last month, and the Reds, Yankees, and Red Sox have also been linked to Estevez at various points this winter. The Cubs are a new team in the hunt, adding to the perception that Chicago is willing to be much more aggressive than usual in pursuing relief pitching.
After the Dodgers signed Scott to a four-year, $72MM deal earlier today, ESPN’s Jesse Rogers (multiple links) reported that the Cubs were second in the bidding, with an offer thought to be “in the ballpark” of what Scott received from Los Angeles. This tracks with the Friday report from Morosi suggesting that the Cubs were one of Scott’s “top remaining suitors,” which was the first time the Cubs had been linked to the southpaw all winter.
Coming even close to a four-year, $72MM offer for a reliever represents a huge sea change in how Chicago usually approaches its bullpen. President of baseball operations Jed Hoyer has never signed a reliever to a multi-year contract during his four-plus years in charge of the Cubs’ front office, and Hector Neris’ one-year, $9MM pact from a year ago represents the most money Hoyer has given to a relief pitcher.
Improving the relief corps was a stated goal for Hoyer heading into the offseason, and just earlier this week, the PBO stated that the team was still looking to add more to its bullpen. Chicago’s biggest bullpen acquisitions of the winter have thus far fit Hoyer’s preferred lower-cost models — a one-year, $2.75MM deal with Caleb Thielbar, and trading for Eli Morgan, who will make $950K in 2025 and is arbitration-controlled through 20227.
Porter Hodge looked tremendous in his rookie season, to the point that he took over as the Cubs’ closer down the stretch when the team’s bullpen ranks were reduced by injury. Hodge will certainly be in the high-leverage mix next year, though having him as a full-time closer could be a lot to ask of a second-year pitcher with just 43 big league innings on his resume. Adding a veteran reliever with closing experience like Estevez makes a lot of sense for Chicago, even if Estevez might ultimately end up as a setup man if Hodge can handle being the primary ninth-inning option.
MLBTR projected Estevez for a three-year, $27MM contract, though it is unclear what exactly Estevez and his reps at Premier Talent are looking to land in second foray into the open market. It is safe to say Estevez’s price tag will be much less than Scott’s contract, so if the Cubs were willing to venture into that spending area, Estevez should be well within their price range. Signing Estevez to something in the range of MLBTR’s projection would also match the $9MM average annual value of the Neris contract, which could be more palatable for Hoyer.
It was two offseasons ago that Estevez signed a two-year, $13.5MM guarantee from the Angels, but it is safe to say his asking price has risen considerably after he established himself as a viable closing candidate. Estevez has a 3.22 ERA over 117 1/3 innings with the Angels and Phillies over the last two seasons, and the 2024 campaign saw him reduce both his walk rate and (more troublingly) his strikeout rate. Philadelphia is seemingly taking a less-costly approach to its own bullpen, so there doesn’t appear to be much chance of a reunion between Estevez and the Phillies, plus Hoffman already signed with the Blue Jays.
Gotta love the runner up articles
Cubs should get Estevez or Yates quick.
Correct. They are not going to win the division with their current bullpen.
Yates
It please, no four year deals for Estevez.
At least it’s not about the jays as a fan of theirs I just can’t handle it anymore. Rogers won’t be getting the few hundred dollars I normally spend at the skydome.
Yeah, Toronto seems to lead the league in runner-up articles. Then the few guys they do sign are runner-up quality at a premium price. Not a great look!
I think Santander was a better deal than Tanner Scott. Even if he regresses to a 0.235 hitter (avg) with 32-33 home runs.
“Hodge will certainly be in the high-leverage mix next year…” But not in 2025…that’s a bummer.
Estevez will probably sign with the Dodgers too.
Realistically I can see the Dodgers resigning Kershaw and maybe a Lux type deal for May or one like him.
Most of the heavy lifting is done at this point unless a bargain comes across the table.
The dodgers can just defer more money
They’ll be deferring save opportunities for a few years at least.
How many pitchers can the Dodgers keep on their roster? 25?
F#&” the dodgers
Drill your mama
You can bet that hoyer will not get into bidding war for any reliever and that when he does offer, that’s it. Hoyer has saline put himself and his team in this position by not being aggressive and now time running out on poor Jed.
Carlos Estevez got ran out of Anaheim due to their bigoted M-A-G-A supporting fanbase who didn’t approve of him doing an anime celebration to close out games.
What are you talking about? He was traded to Philly.
Go back down into your mom’s basement and zip it.
Make Estevez Great Again
Da hell?
Oh please, I want to hear more, I just love it when people bring politics into baseball!!!! As if I haven’t had enough of a piss poor week being a Padres fan!!!
Troll
Gonna be interesting to see how the arb process plays out over the next 18000 years for Eli Morgan
I bet he gets nontendered by 2050.
his salary will only be like $65 million by that point. but with the year-by-year increase in price the cubbies might find that too rich for a 50-something year old pitcher
Bobby Bonilla will be proud
As usual, the cubbies will undoubtedly come up with the left overs!
Hoyer go get Esteves and Robertson or Yates. Any of two of the three..
72million was a lot to pay for a reliever with only couple years success . We shall see .
While it is somewhat reassuring to read the Cubs were finally willing to pay for a top-end reliever, they still couldn’t get it done. Jed has really botched this offseason. Even if they knee-jerk and overpay for Estevez, this has been poorly handled.
I love getting a player like Tucker, but we all know 90% chance he walks after this season. Really difficult to sit here and say this team is any better than they were in ‘24, by adding Tucker and moving Paredes and Bellinger. If Shaw hits like he has in MiLB then yeah, they’re much better, but if he struggles and they have no good options to man the 3B position everyday, this team is much worse. Hoyer has given up quite a bit trying to get a 3Bman to still have a hole there now.
Lots of question marks remain to be nearing February.
If think 4/66 is better than 4/72 with 20+ mil deferred
Probably about equal, so it came down to the dodgers are the better team and the players want to win
What the hell comment is that? Players want to win on every team.
but when you dont have a team, and multiple teams want you, comparable money means you look at some other values of yours. dodgers> cubs, so scott signed with dodgers. wasnt any personal attack
Rather they sign Estevez’s more talented cousin, Emilio.
Give it a Rest-evez
His slider has a nice Sheen to it.
I heard it was just a bit outside.
From your keyboard to God’s ears. Or keyboard.
I would take Yates or Sewald over Estevez
Why?
I think they are better pitchers.
Yates > Estevez > Sewald > Robertson IMHO
Exactly the 2 guys I hope they end up with.
I think the Dodgers activity the last few years is going to be looked at pretty closely by MLB. Along with mega-contracts like Soto, I agree, recent events will lead to a salary cap or other similar rules. MLB may create rules regarding deferred money, or look at their international signing regulations.
That would have to be approved by the union. Gotta love those unions.
They already approved the current system. Think about that
@robert-5
Soto’s contract appears fine. He has no deferrals and isn’t signed past 40 y.o.
@robert The league already has rules regarding deferred $. They outlined when and how they are to be funded as well as how they count against luxury tax. Nothing is going to change in regards to deferrals. Because some fans do not understand them does not make them wrong in any way.
You also speak of MLB as this independent body governing the game. Commissioner is selected by the owners and MLB offices are funded by the franchises. Ultimately MLB is a centralized body working for the owners collectively.
Give Estevez a good not stupid contract but if Hodge shows he is better closer give him the ball and sign Alosay are Closer before the injury to a unique contract, that does nothing really will keep him afloat for next year and the year after he gets his fair shot or we’re gonna lose a very good relief picture
Alzolay should be available for a minor league contract at the minimum
The union will never accept a cap
That’s the hill they die on
Just that there are owners who don’t want to spend money like the Marlins who have done nothing to improve from last years last place finish.
That’s the true crime not what the dodgers are doing
I rather a team spend money and try to win then do whatever the Marlins are doing and I’m not even a dodger fan
The A’s forced to raise payroll is Exhibit A. They received a $70M revenue-sharing check and needed to raise payroll above $105M. Logic says that the MLBPA didn’t just pull that number out of hat and isn’t out to make the A’s run at an operating loss next season.
Makes sense. Then their bullpen will consist of 2 and a half men
Lack of aggressiveness means 3rd-4th – 5th options and when the price goes down you can be sure the cubs will be there for the spoils.
Yep, the spoils go to the cubs but hey there will be less competition for their mediocre services!
Last 2 years got Tanner big time money. They better hope he doesn’t regress.
U s are methodical and surely not aggressive which means they will be caught holding empty bag.
I say Robertson being an ex cub and still pitching at 40 would be great fit for the cubs. Hey Jed give him contract he surely cannot refuse a 4,5,6 year contract.
You really need to try harder to troll Cubs articles