The A’s have reached agreement with designated hitter Brent Rooker on a five-year, $60MM extension, reports Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic. The deal includes a vesting option for a sixth season that could push the value to $90MM, including escalators. ESPN’s Jeff Passan reports that the option’s base value is $22MM and that Rooker will make $30MM over the deal’s first three seasons. That represents what would have been The Bledsoe Agency client’s arbitration years. The deal covers his arb window and buys out at least two free agent seasons.
It’s another significant investment in what has been a huge offseason by A’s standards. As shown on MLBTR’s Contract Tracker, Rooker becomes the first A’s player to sign a five-year deal since the club extended starting pitcher Trevor Cahill for $30.5MM in 2011. It’s the team’s second investment for $60MM+ this winter. Last month, they added Luis Severino on a three-year, $67MM free agent deal that represented the largest contract in franchise history.
Rooker securing such a contract would have been impossible to envision two years ago. He landed with the A’s on a waiver claim early in the 2022-23 offseason. Rooker was a 28-year-old DH/corner outfielder who had bounced between the Twins, Padres and Royals without getting much of a look at any stop. As a former top 35 overall draft pick who had hit well in the minors, he was a sensible waiver target. The A’s certainly didn’t envision it working out this well, though.
The righty-swinging Rooker has become not only one of the most successful waiver claims in recent memory but one of baseball’s best hitters. He popped 30 home runs in 526 plate appearances to earn an All-Star selection in 2023. While he was snubbed from the Midsummer Classic last season, Rooker took another major step forward. He connected on 39 homers, 26 doubles and a pair of triples with a massive .293/.365/.562 batting line across 614 plate appearances.
Rooker finished tied for fifth (alongside José Ramírez and Marcell Ozuna) in home runs. Only Aaron Judge, Shohei Ohtani, Anthony Santander and Juan Soto hit more. Among hitters with at least 500 PAs, Rooker ranked in the top 20 in all three slash stats. He finished sixth in slugging — trailing Judge, Ohtani, Bobby Witt Jr., Soto, and Yordan Alvarez.
It’s now two seasons of borderline elite offensive production. Rooker has a .272/.348/.528 slash through more than 1100 plate appearances in an A’s uniform. He’s in the top 15 in slugging percentage and ranks ninth in homers since the start of the ’23 campaign. He’s a middle-of-the-order presence.
There is a decent amount of swing-and-miss to his game. Rooker has fanned in more than 30% of his plate appearances with the A’s. Last year’s production was driven in part by a .362 average on balls in play that’ll be difficult to maintain. Rooker makes a ton of hard contact, though, so he’s probably in line for a modest BABIP regression rather than a huge drop-off.
The ball-in-play normalization happened at the end of last season. Rooker carried an unsustainable .390 BABIP into the All-Star Break. That dropped to .333 in the second half. To his credit, Rooker compensated by cutting his strikeout rate to a much more manageable 24.1% clip during that stretch. It remains to be seen whether he’ll maintain that level of contact, but it’s an encouraging development that presumably affirmed the front office’s confidence in his hitting acumen.
Even if he doesn’t hit .290 while pushing 40 home runs on an annual basis, Rooker should remain an impact bat. The A’s have made clear they envisioned him as the long-term anchor of their lineup. The team reportedly took him off the market in advance of last summer’s trade deadline. They had no interest in allowing trade rumors to rekindle during the offseason. GM David Forst declared within a week of the offseason beginning that the A’s weren’t dealing Rooker. They’re doubling down by committing to him through at least the 2029 season.
Rooker surpassed three years of major league service last season. He was entering his first of three arbitration seasons. MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz had projected a $5.1MM salary for next year. While the specific breakdown is unknown, Rooker will reportedly receive $30MM over what would have been his arbitration window. That leaves an average of $15MM annually for the two free agent seasons. It’s not quite a front-loaded contract, but it appears Rooker will make a little more in the next couple years than he would have had he gone through the arbitration process.
The team makes that tradeoff for the chance to keep him at below-market rates during the 2028-29 seasons — which are scheduled to be their first two years in Las Vegas. The A’s didn’t have any money guaranteed beyond 2027. Severino and recent trade pickup Jeffrey Springs were their only players signed past next season.
The A’s revenue sharing status has been a significant storyline this offseason. Evan Drellich and Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic reported last month that the team could need to push its competitive balance tax payroll to roughly $105MM to avoid an MLBPA grievance. Teams are required to spend revenue sharing money on the on-field product.
Extending Rooker will push their tax number up, though it’s not by a huge amount. The contract comes with a $12MM average annual value. The AAV is the number used for tax purposes, so it wouldn’t matter how the salaries are distributed. Rooker had already been expected to make around $5MM next season. This adds roughly $7MM to the team’s tax number, which will check in around $97MM (as calculated by RosterResource).
The tax number isn’t finalized until the end of the year, so the remainder of the A’s offseason and in-season activity can push that further. Tax considerations are relevant but are far from the only reason for the A’s to make this deal. If they were solely concerned about pushing next season’s CBT number, they could have signed a handful of mid-tier free agents to one-year contracts.
Rooker turned 30 in November. A five-year commitment runs through his age-34 season. There’s some risk in a five-year deal for a player in his 30s who doesn’t provide much defensive value. Yet if Rooker continues hitting at anywhere near this level, his arbitration price tag would have climbed quickly anyhow. He could have put himself in position for an AAV in the $20-25MM range once he hit free agency, a number that the A’s may have been disinclined to match.
At the same time, it’s easy to see the appeal for Rooker of locking in the security. It wasn’t that long ago that he looked like a fringe roster player. He wouldn’t have gotten to free agency until his age-33 season, when a three- or four-year deal might’ve been the ceiling. Sacrificing a little bit of long-term earning upside to avoid injury risk over the next couple seasons is understandable.
This should also solidify Rooker’s spot in what looks to be an up-and-coming A’s lineup. Lawrence Butler, Jacob Wilson, Tyler Soderstrom, Shea Langeliers, JJ Bleday and rebound candidate Zack Gelof have promise as an offensive core. Last summer’s fourth overall pick Nick Kurtz could move quickly as a polished college hitter. The A’s still need a lot to break right to contend in 2025, but things are starting to come into focus. Soderstrom and Kurtz fit best at first base, so perhaps there’ll be a logjam down the line with Rooker locked in at designated hitter. That’d be a good problem to have if both young first basemen reach their offensive ceilings and Rooker continues to hit at an All-Star level.
Image courtesy of Imagn.
don_mossi_ears
Wow. Seems like a bargain for today’s market.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
It is if rook kept hitting with a 900 ops then he could’ve gotten 100 mil
rct
Only if he’s a free agent. He wouldn’t have been a free agent for three more years and is already 30 years old.
deweybelongsinthehall
Exactly. Given his age, it’s great for him to lock in the money. He’ll also be tradable down the road should be continue to hit but the A’s decide to move on. Not playing in Oakland, how many bombs will he hit?
JoeBrady
IMHO, more guys should be taking the money. There is nothing wrong with betting on yourself, but now he is set for life, and in a place where he might feel very comfortable.
deweybelongsinthehall
Totally agree Joe. Four every five to ten who bet on themselves, there will be usually one who pays the price (Alonso turning down the Mets offer is not what I mean)
To be that one is simply not worth it. If you banked $$ already, take that chance but in his case, it’s nice to see..
MLB Top 100 Commenter
This was the Sacramento A’s best move of the off-season!
Yay, Sacramento A’s!
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Also open to reasonable extensions for Shea Langeliers, Lawrence Butler and Nick Kurtz as a way to get to the $105 million competitive balace tax payroll. This will enable the Sacramento A’s to have further team stability over the next half dozen years.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Agreed. This is great news for the city of Sacramento and the entire Sacramento A’s organization.
differentbears
And therefore, the world.
zacharydmanprin
They will play in West Sacramento, Yolo County; across the river from Sacramento.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Exactly, the Sacramento A’s of Sacramento, California!
differentbears
I’ve been conflicted about whether to say anything, because I feel like Zachary D. Manprin could comment about it even without the Yolo. His post didn’t need to mention the Yolo! And that is why this is so tough… for me to tell about the YOLO.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Thank you.
WadeBoggsWildRide
West Sacramento A’s of YOLO County.
JackStrawb
@don_mossi_ears One Pete Alonso-style empty 30 HR year worth a couple of wins, then a terrific season at 29 whose only real difference is that it was propelled by a .362 BABIP that bloated Rooker’s career .230 BA into a .365 OBP in 2024 despite no increase in his BB rate.
Instead of enjoying his arb years on the cheap the A’s just HAD to ensure they have Rooker while he declines and until he’s out of baseball. Guys like Rooker, very, very late bloomers, just the one good year—a very lucky year—are done in their early 30s 9 times out of 10.
There are worse moves, but it reeks of an A’s FO desperate to look busy because Jesu… I mean Las Vegas is coming and because Manfred is in the corner furiously tapping its $12,000 tassled loafers.
Flanster
@DonMossi—-I still remember marveling at Don Mossi ’s ears on his baseball card in the 60’s
giantsfan25
What a steal
Rsox
Good move for the A’s. Bought out all of his arbitration years ensuring cost certainty and a pair of free agent years ensuring he’ll be with the team when they move to Vegas
crazybaseballgal
IF they close the deal on Vegas.
BlooperDisbeliever
Woah. I expected some front-loaded deal to put them over the grievance threshold. If he’s anywhere close to last year this should be tremendous. 3 Arb years that’d probably total $14M, so another 2 for 45. should be ok value. That last year doesn’t seem like a great idea for a 35 year old DH.
YankeesBleacherCreature
He’s already 30 so I can understand his motivation.
JoeBrady
MLB-R has him at $5.1M for this season, so his three-year total could be close to $25-30M. On the final year, I figure if he vests, then he’s probably done enough to be worth it.
Luke Strong
Nice move by the A’s. Rooker is a stud.
bob9988 2
How does Oakland get these guys to sign under market contracts?
shark stitches
Who else did they get to sign under market contracts?
Blue Baron
shark stitches: By what measure is it under market for his age and service time?
stymeedone
Also, he’s a DH only.
JoeBrady
Blue Baron
shark stitches: By what measure is it under market
=====================
My guess is that the floor on his arb years is $25M, and probably closer to $30M, making his two FA buy-out years $30M/2.
Soto will be getting $51M for his 178 OPS+, so I figure $15M for Rooker’s 165+ is a pretty good bargain.
Blue Baron
JoeBrady: Comparing Soto and Rooker is not apples to apples given that they were not both free agents.
Waldo29
Who are you including as “these guys”? Because, as a lifelong A’s fan, we never have someone signed to bargain contracts unless it’s a young player and even then it’s been a long time lol
And when we do go big (by our standards), the deal turns out like Billy Butler and Trevor Rosenthal
bryanestrella7
He is 30 with only 2 good years good deal for him and his family.
Gwynning
Oak… who??
Great move A’s and nice bag Rook!
JoeBrady
Not for nothing Gwynning, but I can generally upvote your comments without looking.
Van Lingle Mungo
He must have a lot of love for Sacramento. That does not seem like a lot of money for a guy with 5.6 WAR last season. Then again, he is 30.
Ragnarok
He’s 30 and was suppressed via arb.
astros_fan_84
It’s hard to fault a 30 year old DH for cashing in on 60M. That’s an incredibly high amount of money for a late bloomer.
JoeBrady
This is one of my favorite things about BB. In every other sport, you are generally in or you’re out. In BB, you can struggle for 10 years, looking to scrape by at Starbucks in the off-season, then blossom as an RP at age 30 and make millions.
shark stitches
That’s a great deal for the A’s.
DonOsbourne
I get why they did it, but this will end poorly. This is Chris Davis waiting to happen.
shark stitches
It’s $12M per year Nostradamus. They got about $25M in value from him just last year.
Ragnarok
They weren’t going to pay him $12MM total for the next 2.
It’s a solid R/R for a team that needs to spend but I don’t think it’s a crazy bargain given his age, relatively short 2 year track record, and defensive limitation
DonOsbourne
A 30 year old, RH hitting, DH-only, who strikes out 30% of the time is a bad investment. I get he had a great year, but the odds are against him. They would have been better off trading him at peek value.
DonOsbourne
*peak*
Denden
He’s had two good years. The A’s got a low cost deal that will be highly desirable on the trade market if they decide to trade him
don_mossi_ears
Rooker hit .293 last year. Davis never hit over .250.
YankeesBleacherCreature
Davis signed in 2016 for 7/161. This is Jose Abreu at worst and Abreu signed at age 36.
DonOsbourne
I just mean in terms of a steep drop off in production. When Rooker declines, it’ll be fast and furious.
YankeesBleacherCreature
Let’s assume Rooker maintains his production over the next three years. His arb salary this year is projected to be $5.1M. These are my guesses: ’26 – $14M, ’27 – $22.5M. That’s $41M. Is $19M for two years of a declining firstbaseman/DH that bad taking into consideration the salary inflation in another three years?
DonOsbourne
His BAbip last season was .362. For a guy who doesn’t run well, that isn’t sustainable for two years much less another three. The regression will come quickly and sharply. A large market team can maybe absorb that kind of mistake, but this contract will hurt the A’s for more years than it will help.
I don’t want to be the negative guy here. But the stats are impossible to ignore. Great for the A’s locking up one of their guys. They should have picked a different guy.
Ragnarok
You’re way high on his arb figures. Spotrac had him at $3.5MM projected this year.
Ragnarok
I see MLBTR had him at $5.1MM though.
Still on the high side on your increases there but that helps. He would’ve made more than $12MM over 2 years.
outinleftfield
This website is actually accurate on their arb projection figures. Spotrac is not.
YankeesBleacherCreature
@Ragnarok The Athletics and Fangraphs often quote this site’s MLB arb projections. I’ve yet to see any website use Sportrac’s.
letsgooakland123
1 – BAbip has much more to do with contact quality than base running
2 – he’s an above average base runner anyways (68 value per Statcast)
His BAbip was .362, which was much higher than the league average .292. However, he also makes much stronger contact than the rest of the league (line drive 49.9%, 11% above league average in 2024). His career line drive is 49.4% and his career BABip is .327. I think it’s fair to say that he’ll stay around there for his career, but for the sake of argument let’s say it falls to .310 and split the difference.
Ok, so his batting average based on 2024 would fall to .241. OBP would fall from .365 to .334. Calculating SLG fall off is difficult because I’d have to know how many singles, doubles, triples, HRs, walks, HBPs he had. But let’s say it falls from .562 to .500, his career average.
Batting line .243/.334/.500 for an OPS of .834.
That projection pegs him for an OPS+ of around 130-135? For that kind of production and limited defensive versatility 5/60 is a fair deal for both sides.
don_mossi_ears
Oops I was thinking of Khris Davis, the former A’s slugger.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
Krush Davis was the king at hitting .247
Gwynning
I was amazed when he did it in back-to-back years… hooooh boy, that was just the beginning!
Lapillus
Cheaper than Chris Taylor, we’ll take it
YankeesBleacherCreature
Amazing job, A’s!
(Somewhere Scott Boras just shed a tear.)
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
Is this like the longest deal the A’s have ever handed out? At least in recent memory?
YankeesBleacherCreature
Matching Eric Chavez’ 5 years I think.
casualfan
Well done, Oakl…errr, Sacra….errr, Vega….errrr, Yeah, that’s it, Vegas A’s!
Bart Harley Jarvis
Yes, the Sacramento A’s! Woot woot!
Bart Harley Jarvis
Exactly, the Sacramento A’s of Sacramento, California!
gbs42
Just “the A’s” until they move to Vegas.
Ben K
Good to see for A’s fans.
don_mossi_ears
I think A’s can compete in AL West next season. Astros seem worse, Mariners can’t hit, Angels are rebuilding. Only team I would worry about is Rangers because Bochy showed that every other year World Series magic with Giants in 2010-2014.
orbitsbrother
They likely compete with Texas for third place. It is still the Astros division.
metsin4
The Astros will be lucky to finish .500.
orbitsbrother
That’s wishful thinking by you.
metsin4
No it’s just reality
MLB Top 100 Commenter
With the present roster configurations, Mariners, Rangers, Astros and A’s all look like teams that will win between 74 and 86 games next year. If deGrom is healthy all season that could easily be the difference, but a healthy deGrom for a full season seems unlikely.
LordD99
He’s already 30 and couldn’t be a free agent for another three years. No leverage.
outinleftfield
Still a nice paycheck. Just got generational wealth handed to him when he is a guy that as recently as 2022 was a negative WAR for his career and was bouncing from team to team worrying about whether or not his career was over. Good for him.
oldgfan
All he needed was a team to give him regular playing time. A’s do it a lot.
good vibes only
A’s having themselves an interesting offseason..
sadmarinersfan
Indeed. They were also apparently very aggressive on max fried. Seems like their ownership was just trying to get them out of Oakland before he was willing to spend
baycommuter 2
It’s like the husband going out and buying the sports car when the divorce becomes final.
outinleftfield
He is only willing to spend because if he didn’t, he was going to lose his revenue sharing money. He doesn’t have a choice.
enricopallazzo
It’s almost as if he suppressed the payroll on purpose to tank and turn Oakland fans away even more, in addition to raising ticket prices the same time they held a mini-fire sale. All to help point the finger at Oakland as the problem, taking it off of himself (Fisher) when announcing and proceeding to move the team. .
SeaIndy
Announce Robinson Cano to the Mariners as their big free agent acquisition.
sadmarinersfan
Seems like the type of deal that is good for a year or two, but looks pretty bad towards the back end. Hopefully that’s not the case, I like Brent rooker, I never would’ve thought he’d be getting a 90 million dollar extension a couple years ago when he was getting dfad and claimed every other week
Greensoxbaseball
Great deal for the A’s imo
GO1962
The Athletics take a gamble on a 5 year contract with a player who has surpassed his 30th birthday. Anyone want to place a bet on whether the contract will pay off for the Athletics over the 5 year period?
JoeBrady
Anyone want to place a bet on whether the contract will pay off
========================
I’d make that bet. Assuming he was fairly automatic to be retained for his 3 arb years, then this is $30M/2 for the buy-out. With inflation what it is, I’d bet he’d make that easily. Pederson just picked up $37M/2.
baycommuter 2
It may not be a good deal on the back end but it’s not that expensive. The A’s have to stop trading their best players well before they reach free agency for their fans, young stars (and their agents) to take them seriously.
Mlbfan78
If he was 23 this wouldn’t have been that great of a deal for him, however at 30 with 3 more arb years ahead of him, this makes perfect sense, gets life changing money and look what Walker got to sign with Houston, the numbers are similar once you remove the arb years & Rooker would have been Walkers age if he didn’t sign this deal so the going rate still applies here & he has security & the A’s move closer to that 105 mil number they have to reach, & have a slugger under team control for a few years.
YourDreamGM
A+ for A’s. Can’t imagine them getting him cheaper. 2 free agent years for the price of 1. As free agent he might got 3 or 4 years.
DonOsbourne
Come on Dream. I get it. Everybody wants to see the A’s finally spend some dollars. But this is spending for the sake of spending. Smart money wins baseball games. Ask a simple question: Would the Yankees have made this move? Of course they would have. But would the Rays have made this move? Not in a million years. That says everything.
YourDreamGM
I think it’s team friendly. I think the Rays or any team would do this. I see why they didn’t trade him now. Either get something great or we extend him. I don’t give a it if A’s spend $ or not. Any team that did this would get a A.
There isn’t much risk. He would have to drastically fall off to not be worth this. Best case he doesn’t and it’s buy 1 free agent year get 1 free.
YourDreamGM
Just as important as his talent is the pr. Going to a new city. Maybe going to new city again. Nice to say hey we will spend $. Lock up our good players.
Lionoflambs
Ehhh the Yankees didn’t sign Luke Voit for 5 years… Rays signed Wander Franco for 10 years
Maybe not an A+ signing, but he’s not wrong about the free agent years. If Rooker keeps mashing and baseball contracts keep trending like they do that first free agent year in 2028 will be a steal. Then again the Mets are offering 90 million to Pete Alonso
stymeedone
Are you sure the Mets are still offering that much?
metsin4
The Rays would have jumped all over this deal.
MikeSadek3333
Yes they would—and trade him as soon as he got to the 10 million a year mark!!!
YankeesBleacherCreature
@Don. The A’s need to establish an identity. Now they have a star player and household name to open up Sacramento and Vegas (especially). The Rays don’t share the same sense of urgency.
James Midway
Good move for both. So Rooker will be on the scoreboard in the new stadium just like in the rendering.
TrillionaireTeamOperator
The irony that the so-called Quadruple-A’s are finally kinda sorta handing out big league sized deals while they play the next 3 seasons in an actual minor league ball park is just chef’s kiss bewildering.
Kinda frustrating that they’re finally operating on a budget that looks and feels like an actual major league club, but they still hand out oddly bloated contracts to players that aren’t really worthy of them. I think back to when one of the biggest deals they ever doled out was 3 years/$21M to Esteban Loaiza- now, granted, pitchers with Loaiza’s numbers at that point in time regularly get like 2 years/$32M or 3 years/$60M nowadays, but back then even $7M a year for a guy like him was obscene.
I just… wish they’d operate like a normal mid market major league club.
dezpoo
Like what a few people have said, their payroll needs to hit a floor to maximize their revenue sharing. They are pretty far from it still so they def need to make some splurges. They will still need to probably spend another $20-30M to hit it.
ClevelandSteelEngines
One-two years and trade. Rooker had a fantastic ’24, but there are a lot factors that’ll need to line up for this run to continue.
Ducey
Agreed. No way he plays out his contract in an A’s uniform
outinleftfield
Good signing. The A’s are now just a few million away from that magical $105 million payroll to keep the revenue sharing checks coming in.
dezpoo
I think more than a few millions … before this, I think they were sitting at like $55M? His salary this year won’t be much since he was still under control.
outinleftfield
Before this signing they were at $83 million for CBT payroll. This puts them at $95 million. Just a few million away
bpskelly
He’s almost 30. Kudos for him to getting a real contract. And by MLB standards, it’s a bargain.
If he mashes, he’s underpaid. If and when he declines, he’s not breaking the bank.
And he and his family are set for life now. Good all around.
stymeedone
Unless when they get to Vegas, he goes “Put it all on black!”
letitbelowenstein
A’s have done more than the O’s this off season. It’s like the Bizarro world MLB.
metsin4
When have the Orioles ever spent much?
Ragnarok
O’s have spent more money than the A’s on salaries next year during this offseason.
This one belongs to the Reds
Fisher found that wallet in El Segundo, apparently.
Good move, A’s.
tom brunanskys black sock
Good for him! Who would imagined this after watching how putrid he was the first month or so of last season. Good for him for persevering and kudos to the A’s for their stickwithitotude.
28rings
Wow! great deal… I guess he’s happy in Oakland… I mean Vegas… I mean Sacramento
ron_karate
Those poor fans in Oakland. Suffering through years of neglect. Then once the team leaves management immediately opens the checkbook.
2012orioles
That’s what I was about to say. Just another slap in the face. I’m sure most of them are still A’s fans (maybe I’m wrong on that) but a good chunk of fans feel this team abandoned them and want no part of it anymore
gbs42
They’re spending just enough to get their full revenue sharing payout, nothing more.
JoeBrady
The “poor fans”? Oakland was plenty successful for most of this century. Even as recently as 2018/19, they won 97 games, and managed to draw a whopping 1.6M fans. That was good for #26 & #23 in attendance.
metsin4
They didn’t spend with the intention of getting out of Oakland. It was the sole reason for not spending.
Mikenmn
You used the word “investment” twice, but we should be clear that what Oakland-LV-Sacramento is doing is “investing” revenue sharing money in order to keep it. It’s not like ownership is plunging in with their own cash. Kind of a tough thing to swallow for the folks (previously) back home. Philly A’s, KC A’s. Oakland A’s, now Taxpayer+Revenue Sharing A’s. I know, it’s just business, but if they had these plans they should have shared it. They didn’t spend in Oakland because they didn’t get free goods.
Sabermetric Acolyte
Ok… so this has been kinda brought up. This year will they be called “Sacramento Athletics” or for some reason will they start using the Las Vegas moniker?
gbs42
No city, just the A’s.
gbs42
My guess at the breakdown:
2025: $5M
2026: $8M
2027: $12M
2028: $16M
2029: $19M
2030: $22M option
gbs42
I missed the “$30M over the first 3 years” part. Definitely somewhat front-loaded given his predicted $5.1M arb salary, probably to help them get to $105M this year.
2025: $8M
2026: $10M
2027: $12M
2028: $14M
2029: $16M
2030: $22M option
Acoss1331
Rooker played the smart move, this contract gives him both job security and a nice bag of money, especially for a guy that’s already 30.
zacharydmanprin
Rooker will also be playing home games at Sutter Health Field rather than the Oakland Coliseum. The Coliseum favors RH pull hitters (think Frank Thomas). Who knows how that AAA park is going to play?
2020vision
That minor league stadium will play in a way that gives someone like Jacob Wilson a legitimate shot at a batting title. Oakland Coliseum had too much foul territory for any A’s player to win one.
dave 2
So… I guess the moral of the story is if you downgrade your stadium you’ll have money to spend on your team?
Mlbfan78
No the moral of the story is the A’s had to spend money to avoid a grievance from the union, if that threat wasn’t on the table they wouldn’t be spending money like this.
Basically they are forced to, if they want revenue sharing and to avoid that grievance filed.
dave 2
Well if they can do that in a minor league park and smaller market then the grievance must be legitimate.
Old York
Good for Mr. Rooker and it’s not too greedy like some players.
The Saber-toothed Superfife
Sleeping Tigers
Should have hired the Superfife!
I am beginning to think Chris Illich is just not a Good Guy or a very nice person……
2020vision
Who else guesses what the dollar amount is before seeing what’s reported; like guessing the line on a game before seeing the actual line? I only missed this one by $30million in real value and $15million in what the A’s would have offered. In other words, this is a bargain.
HalosHeavenJJ
Good for Rooker. That’s life changing money.
RicoD
Feels like a win win signing. Works well for what both parties are looking to achieve. Glad it worked out for them and hope Rooker continues his success.
energel
Fuc k ig no pirates trade.
energel
very cheap, great deal for las vegas
Dock_Elvis
Good for Rooker! Class guy. He stood in KC during BP when no one was really there in that awful 2023 season…and fed balls to my 10 year old by the dugout. Came and sought him out. He got a kick out of seeing my son try to handle them all. I think he left with 10 balls.