Cody Bellinger has stood as one of the most recognizable but difficult-to-move names on the offseason trade market. Among the teams to reach out recently are the Yankees, Astros and Mariners, reports Bruce Levine of 670 The Score. However, Levine adds that the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money in a deal. That’s likely to be an issue. ESPN’s Buster Olney wrote this morning that other teams feel the Cubs will need to pay down a notable portion of Bellinger’s salary (or, presumably, take back another contract) if they intend to get much in the way of a return.
The Cubs have been looking to upgrade various spots on the roster but have a tough road to do so, in part due to no-trade clauses for Dansby Swanson, Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki. Other positions, like first base (Michael Busch) and center field (Pete Crow-Armstrong) are already manned by promising young players. Third baseman Isaac Paredes was only just acquired at the deadline. Second baseman Nico Hoerner makes some sense as an option to free up some cash and a spot in the lineup for a more impactful bat, but he’s coming off flexor surgery.
That’s led the Cubs to at least gauge interest in Bellinger, who passed on the opportunity to opt out of the remaining two years and $52.5MM on his contract at the beginning of the offseason. Bellinger had a fine year overall, hitting .266/.325/.426 with 18 homers and a tiny 15.6% strikeout rate (his second straight season with that exact strikeout rate). But while those numbers were solid, they pale in comparison to his 2023 showing. He also posted lesser defensive grades both in the outfield and at first bae in 2024.
[Related: Looking for a Match in a Cody Bellinger Trade]
The Yankees have been laying some groundwork in the event that Juan Soto ultimately signs elsewhere, showing recent interest in top-tier free agents like Corbin Burnes, Max Fried and Willy Adames. That said, there’d pretty clearly be room for both Bellinger and Soto on the same roster. Bellinger could slot in at first base in the Bronx, offering another left-handed bat with good contact skills — a contrast to some of the strikeout-prone righties elsewhere in the lineup. He’d also be good insurance in the outfield, given the injury histories of both Aaron Judge and top prospect Jasson Dominguez. Bellinger could also serve as a safety net in the event that Dominguez looks overmatched early on.
In Houston, the Astros have a clear need at first base after their three-year, $58.5MM deal with Jose Abreu went sideways almost immediately. After a poor first year in 2023, Abreu started the 2024 season so poorly that he consented to being optioned to the minors. That Triple-A stint didn’t help, and Abreu was released less than halfway through that three-year deal. The ’Stros subsequently gave most of the playing time at first base to Jon Singleton, who provided light offense and subpar defense the rest of the way.
For the Mariners, first base has emerged as a clear need. They have at least one intriguing in-house option in prospect Tyler Locklear, but the M’s have been linked heavily to veterans Carlos Santana and Justin Turner as they search for a veteran bat at first base (and likely another at the hot corner). Bellinger’s contact skills would help Seattle cut down on the team’s longstanding strikeout issues as well.
The bigger issue with regard to Bellinger isn’t so much his overall ability, but rather the magnitude of his contract. He’s owed $52.5MM over the next two season — a guarantee that’s paid out in heavily frontloaded fashion. He’s taking home a $27.5MM salary in 2025 and is owed a $5MM buyout on a $25MM player option for the 2026 season if he opts out of the contract’s final season next winter. For an acquiring team, Bellinger would add $26.25MM to the luxury tax ledger and would cost at least $32.5MM in terms of actual, present-day salary.
For the 2023 version of Bellinger — .307/.356/.525 (136 wRC+), 26 home runs — teams would happily pay that price. Of course, if Bellinger had produced at that same level in 2024, he’d surely have taken the first opt-out opportunity in his contract at the beginning of this offseason. That he chose to forgo his opt-out clause is indicative of the fact that he and agent Scott Boras don’t believe there’s a sizable nine-figure contract waiting for him.
With regard to the Yankees, that luxury number could be problematic. Whether they sign Soto or pursue multiple free agents from the Fried/Burnes/Adames bucket after missing out on him, they’ll surely be a luxury tax payor in at least the third tier of penalty — if not the fourth. Since they’re looking at paying the tax in three straight seasons, that means they’ll either be staring down a 95% tax or 110% tax rate. Bellinger would cost them somewhere between $52-56MM in combined salary and taxes — plus that potential $5MM buyout on the 2026 option. Even for a deep-pocketed club like the Yankees, that’s a staggering price to pay, particularly coming off a good-not-great season for Bellinger.
The Astros, too, have some luxury concerns. RosterResource estimates that they’re just about $7MM shy of the first-tier threshold. They’ve looked into trading Ryan Pressly, but even if Houston were able to unload his full $14MM salary, Bellinger would still thrust them back into luxury territory. The 2024 season was the first in which owner Jim Crane authorized paying the tax. Adding Bellinger would very likely require doing so a second time. Speculatively speaking, a swap of Pressly and Bellinger could make sense for both parties involved, though Pressly can veto any potential deal as a player with 10-and-5 rights.
Luxury considerations don’t apply to the Mariners, but the actual bottom-line cash owed to Bellinger will be an obstacle. Seattle is looking to add two infielders — one at each corner — and ownership doesn’t seem to have an appetite for raising payroll too far beyond last year’s roughly $145MM level. The Mariners already project for a number in a similar range. If they could find a taker for one Mitch Haniger or Mitch Garver, perhaps Bellinger would become more realistic. For now, it seems likely that ever-active president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto is simply doing due diligence, perhaps hoping the Cubs will pay down some of the contract (if not take someone like Garver back as part of the return).
jeff51488
Wow
Big whiffa
Yankees linked to every big name bc they kno Soto ain’t coming back
KnicksFanCavsFan
Is Soto the only position they need to address? Until Soto says “yes” then you go any your due diligence at all positions of need. They might be considering Bellinger to play 1b.
Pete'sView
And I think it’s the Yanks where Bellinger will end up.
Lionoflambs
Wow is right… he’s a .260-.280 hitter with MVP upside and is owned 25 millions to give you league to above league average Wrc and the cubbies acting like people gonna take on his money and give them top prospects
ortsacnilrats
If someone offers to take him and pay him in full the Cubs should do it for nothing else in return. Then go after Burnes.
Blackpink in the area
I wouldn’t count on that happening.
Led Hoyer
The cubs refuse to spend at the top of the market. I just don’t see a path where they trade bellinger and somehow get better. It makes no sense. It sounds like shed the contract and hope Owen Caissie out produces bellinger. Maybe get a bullpen arm for him. Hoyer put himself in this conundrum building an 83 win team with no open spots. The only two viable trade options are also some of their best all around players.
Blackpink in the area
Yeah I agree Led it doesn’t add up. It seems like they want to move Bellinger to fill their other needs but they don’t have many other needs.
This site was saying the Cubs were gonna spend 60 million this offseason. Does anyone still think that happens? Sure doesn’t seem like it to me.
pt57
Cubs need another starter and a closer.
Blackpink in the area
The Cubs don’t need another starter. Definitely need pen help.
pt57
Yeah, they do. A top if the rotation type of arm.
I don’t think they should count on Imanaga and Tallion repeating last year. Wrigley played like a pitcher’s park last year. Rotation would be a whole better if everyone were pushed down a slot. Assad might be better off in bp, he doesn’t go 5 often enough.
But that’s probably not going to happen. Cubs are good at pretending to be competitive.
pt57
Yeah, I hope it’s just to clear a spot for Caissie.
Unclemike1526
Well the Cubs had 70 million to spend WITH Bellinger. They’ve spent 15 million on Boyd. So that leaves 55 million to spend up to the tax. I hope Hoyer is smart enough to keep 10 million in reserve for the deadline but well it’s Hoyer. If they can move Bellinger it opens more possibilities but then you have to bring in another bat. This ought to be an interesting Winter Meetings to be sure. Which way do they go? Trade prospects for a young stud P? Trade Belli and play at the top? Can’t wait to see what they do.
twozero6ix
Sounds like Hoerner is going to Seattle in the next week or so, Belli for Garver I guess? Dipoto will trade the soles off his shoes if he can
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
Belly is worth a lot more than garver
Also idk if we are going to get either in a trade
mynameisjeff253
Belli is a negative asset right now. Perhaps moreso than Garver. Think about the dollars and years. Garver’s contract ends this season at like $12M where Belli is $27M this year and $25M next or $5M buyout. I’d rather have Garver than Belli at their current values. Garver is at least a serviceable backup catcher. Haniger on the other hand….no value whatsoever.
Cmurphy
Garver was horrible with Seattle last year. So many first pitch outs. I think he even hit into a first pitch DP after the pitcher loaded the bases with walks.
Led Hoyer
Garver was really bad last year. Below replacement level. From a production standpoint every penny he was paid was an overpay. Bellinger has put up 4.5 and 2.5 War the last two years. Banking on a 3+ WAR in 2025 probably isn’t a bad bet. He’s a good player, i really hope they don’t trade him for a worthless asset. Tack on prospects, pay it down, or better yet just keep him. 2024 Wrigley was a pitchers paradise.
Blackpink in the area
Bellinger for Garver is reasonable.
pt57
No, no it’s not.
Blackpink in the area
Yes. Yes it is.
Bellinger has a bad contract. So does Garver. At least with Garver you can walk away from it after 2025. Bellinger will probably opt in to his deal for 2026.
Pete'sView
Nope. Despite his poor contract, Bellinger is still useful. In what world do the Cubs need Garver even if considering saving some money?
Blackpink in the area
Bellinger is owed a probable 52.5 million over the next 2 years. Garver is owed 13.5 million. That’s a gigantic amount of savings for the Cubs. And Garver is a catcher the Cubs could use catching help. They really gonna roll with Amaya and Thaiss?
pt57
Bellinger likely won’t opt in next year. It’s a $20 million decision for him. He’ll easily beat that unless he gets hurt or is really terrible.
Blackpink in the area
If he has another season like he did in 2024 he’s not easily beating that.
Dogbone
Exactly – and that’s why the contract isn’t bad, for the Cubs. They should keep him around one more year.
Blackpink in the area
And if he does leave the Cubs or whoever team he is on at the time has to pay him 5 million to play somewhere else.
Like I said Garver is only owed 13.5 million.
Jean Matrac
The M’s aren’t taking on Bellinger’s contract.
Captainmike1
No intelligent GM would take him at full salary
Bookbook
Nor would the M’s.
metsin4
They wouldn’t have called if they weren’t thinking about it.
Jean Matrac
metsin4, Not necessarily. Maybe they called hoping the Cubs would eat a decent sized portion of the money. Depending on the answer, any interest may have waned quickly.
metsin4
There article says they expect to eat some salary.
Jean Matrac
No it doesn’t. In the first paragraph it says, and I quote:
“…the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money in a deal.”
metsin4
And then goes on to say
That’s likely to be an issue. ESPN’s Buster Olney wrote this morning that other teams feel the Cubs will need to pay down a notable portion of Bellinger’s salary (or, presumably, take back another contract) if they intend to get much in the way of a return
Jean Matrac
You’re missing the point. It doesn’t matter that other clubs think they need to eat salary. Right now the Cubs are saying they aren’t. So, it’s very clear that the article did not say the Cubs expected to eat some salary.
And if they’re saying that now, then they probably said that to the M’s. And since the M’s aren’t taking on Bellinger’s salary, any interest they had is probably diminished.
slund24
Maybe they would take on Bellingers contract if they can ship Cubs Garver and Haniger.. But not sure they’d even do that because its still taking on an extra year of a bad contract.
Dogbone
IMO, I see no reason for the Cubs to trade Belli before the season – unless a team knocks their socks off with an offer. Bellinger helps the Cubs this season In many ways. His contract is NOT hampering the Cubs from making any additional moves that they currently don’t have the room to pursue.
Bellinger is likely to deliver numbers between those of the last two years.
His quality defense and position flexibility mean so much.
Bellingers value isn’t likely to decline.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
Why do you say that? Jerry maneuvers very effectively given the financial constraints imposed upon him.
BillR47
If both Bellinger and Hoerner were going to Seattle I would wager that Luis Castillo and the 2ys/50M owed to him would go back to Chicago. Thats the only way the trade is “revenue neutral” enough for the Mariners to take on both of their contracts. Perhaps the Ms would need to include a decent prospect or high-leverage reliever (Gregory Santos?) to balance things out. Does Chicago want/need a good starter who chews up innings?
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
We wouldn’t sell Santos at his low point
Or would we?
Blackpink in the area
Cubs must be hurting for money. Why else trade Bellinger?
politicsNbaseball
They’re one of the most popular teams in the sport, I doubt it. Just have a cheap owner. They should be trying to sign Soto not trying to shed salary
Blackpink in the area
My point is clear. There is no reason to trade Bellinger unless they are trying to save money.
pt57
To open up a spot for their minor league depth.
If Suzuki can hack it in RF, the Cubs could use DH to give their minor leaguers ABs.
Blackpink in the area
A win now team is going to trade away a good player because they have minor league depth?
This is a cost cutting move if they trade him.
politicsNbaseball
It’s definitely a cost cutting move but because their owner wants to increase profit not because they are hurting for money. I think we were always on the same page lol
Unclemike1526
Ricketts is a cheap owner? I still love morons who say that. He’s spent about a billion dollars to improve the Ballpark, Neighborhood and Farm system to be one of the best in baseball. So now he expects to make a profit? The nerve of that guy! People are morons.
Big whiffa
Don’t believe everything reported by the media lol. Just bc they are listening to offers doesn’t mean they have any desire to trade him. Cubs lineup is deep but average which means bellinger is even more valuable in that lineup. Also, it’s a one year deal at 32.5 mil which is a really bad contract. Bellinger has to completely tank next season not to opt out at season end. I’d say the odds of him being traded are close to 0
PutPeteinthehall
More like 27.5 m. If he opts out rather than returns in 2026 he forfeits the buy out. No reason to move him during the off-season. Play half the season. If he’s raking and the team is below .500 can be moved then. The team needs impact bats. He’s one if healthy. Played hurt last season and had big time shoulder issues his last few seasons in LA. Cubs need a bullpen and a slugging second or third baseman. I doubt Paredes game plays in Chicago. Cubs need a real impact bat.
Big whiffa
If he opts out he does not get the buyout ? That would make it a buyin then I think hmmm….makes sense I guess but are you sure you are right ?
BBB
Like the story says, “he is owed a $5MM buyout on a $25MM player option for the 2026 season if he opts out of the contract’s final season next winter.” He either takes the $25 million, or opts out and walks away with $5 million in his pocket.
Big whiffa
Right. But that’s not what Pete said.
He’s 100% opting out. Bc he’s going to get more than net 20 mil as a free agent next offseason. So he’s gonna take the 5 mil and bail. Thats an absolute 100% lock.
So 1 year at 32.5 mil
Big whiffa
And him making 27.5 is not a bad contract. It’s having to pay him 5 mil when it’s certain that he will be a free agent after that is what makes it terrible contract
Brick House Coffee Tables Inc
Given that the Cubs would have been happy if he had opted out, it stands to reason that they’d give him away for a bucket of chicken if somebody took the entire contract. So then the question becomes what prospect or catcher the Cubs can buy for $10M, $15M (10 plus the 5 in the option) or $10M plus $10M if he opts in for 2026?
Wagner>Cobb
A great fit for the Yankees imho. His bat plays well there, plus he upgrades the defense and base running so much.
Captainmike1
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
TheYankeesFan99
Who Would the Yankees Offer for him though?
itsmeheyhii
Its hard to tell without knowing how much $ the Cubs would actually be willing to eat. It wouldnt take a ton if the Yanks took on the whole contract.
rocky7
The more the Cubs are willing to take on the better the return ask from the Yankees, and of course the opposite…if the Cubs are unwilling to take on significant money, they probably would get a very low minor league player in return……
Captainmike1
5 hot dogs
No more
And cubs pay half his salary
larkraxm
The obvious answer is cash, but the Yankees, and every other team in MLB, have 10 to 15 prospects that every team would be interested in. I remember last off season when the Yankees traded 5 pitchers for Juan Soto that was supposed to “deplete the farm system”. Then they called up a kid named Luis Gil that just went out and became the AL rookie of the year.
Joe says...
Could always send Stro back to the Cubs.
themightygin
Cubs would probably take Trevino. That’s a start. Don’t think the Cubs want Stro back but I’d think they could find a 3rd team that needs pitching to send a middling prospect to the Cubs and take Stroman. Reds? Giants? Yanks still take on salary but at a palatable cost for 1b/CF with upside in the bat.
Joe says...
I was joking about Stro. I can’t blame anyone for not wanting him.
MysteryWhiteBoy13
Still think a straight swap for Bassitt makes sense, Jays can then replace Bassitt with a longer term option. Bellinger makes a lot of sense for the Jays, can play a corner outfield spot, can play first if ten Jays want to play Vlad at third for any amount of time
User 1939973770
The Astros need to just own their mistakes of signing Abreu/Montero/LMJ to bad contracts and pay the luxury tax penalties for any overages.
OR
They could rebuild by offloading Pressly/Valdez/Tucker, but I doubt anyone else being paid $$$$ has any value.
Yankee Clipper
Yankees paid the same for a much, much less well-performing Josh Donaldson.
Jean Matrac
True, but that’s not a good reason to take on an overpaid Bellinger. I like the Yankees as the best fit, but if the Cubs aren’t eating much, if any, of the money. the fit is less than ideal.
YourDreamGM
Makes sense Cubs stand there ground dealing with $man
Stevil
Third base is a clear need for Seattle. Second base is a clear need for Seattle. DH is a clear need for Seattle.
First base is most likely going to be covered by Luke Raley vs. RHPs.
Seattle is going to do their due diligence on anyone who could potentially help them unload Haniger and/or Garver.
Stevil
If anyone’s curious what Luke Raley did in 2024: .243/.320/.463; 129 wRC+; 2.3 fWAR.. He had a 181 wRC+ the last two months of the season and cut down on the strike outs a bit as well (26.8 K%).
And he’s pre-arb.. Given his ability to play the OF and 1B, it would be odd to see him used as the DH. It would be even odder to see him as the fourth outfielder without a clear path to PAs.
bloomquist4hof
I think Raley ends up being part of the First Base solution, it would be a waste not to unless they planned on trading him. Raley’s glove isn’t quite DH worthy yet and the Mariners seem to like him. Getting help at DH and either a full time 3B or 2B (or both) makes way more sense unless it’s a significant upgrade. My guess is fans won’t be happy with what they end up doing.
Stevil
If they’re truly bent on bringing back Turner or Santana, it will be important to have a regular third and second baseman, so they don’t end up having a weak option DHing vs. LHPs.
I’d add that Raley was kind of thrown into first base duties late. With an offseason to prepare, and spring with Perry Hill, I’m not worried about his glove. And if he produces like he did last season, there’s even less reason to worry about his glove.
hllywdjff
So we get Hoerner Parades from the Cubs and Santana to platoon with Raley..Julio loves Santana. There’s our infield…We can go over budget 8 to 10 million dollars. It’s not gonna kill the mariners, for God’s sakes. They’ll make up that money in the first three months of the year with a attendance increase if they’re decent.
Stevil
I don’t know where the Parades name-dropping is coming from, but they just acquired him at the deadline. I don’t know why Chicago would move him.
His hitting profile doesn’t look like a great fit for T-Mobile, either, and I would imagine Seattle could have out-bid the Cubs and acquired him at the deadline themselves if they had been truly interested. That’s speculation on my part, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Seattle isn’t high on him.
hllywdjff
The Cubs have some young infielders ready to come up I read an article from one of the espn guys that Parades could be available for the right price..Could be lol
Stevil
Chicago has a handful of prospects on the cusp of their MLB debuts. Shaw is the most promising, in my opinion.
But this is a team that should be pushing in the chips to really contend. It’s hard to believe they’d rely on multiple rookies to reach the postseason.
They’re probably going to move someone, but more than one? I have doubts.
Salzilla
Yanks are not laying the ground work in case they don’t land Soto. They are doing so because they have multiple areas of need regardless if they land the big fish or not. Bellinger plays 1b and OF, that flexibility would honestly really be of value.
Captainmike1
I might leave the country if the yanks get Cody
But they have made many stupid trades so it should not be a complete surprise
hllywdjff
The mariners are just putting this story out there that they’re interested. And then they’ll come out and say well we just couldn’t get a deal done when they had no intention of making a deal at all….Typical dipoto move
TheGr8One
Doubt Seattle lands him if Chicago is moving him it’s to dump salary and Seattle won’t take him without sending a bad contract back (Garver springs to mind). Bellinger would work here but he’s not a need we send pitching or prospects for.
DarrenDreifortsContract
Hopefully those teams don’t make the postseason.
hllywdjff
Get Hoerner and Parades for Woo and Hancock… That will solve your infield problem
Zippy the Pinhead
Not trading Woo.
hllywdjff
Have to give up an asset to get bats…Woo is very fragile sell high on him he will be hurt within a few years….
TheGr8One
Take Garvers contract and send Seattle a pitching prospect and I make that deal. Seattle will struggle to get bats through FA forcing them to come may be the only way. Going to have to trade to get. Hancock is unproven with upside but Seattle needs today-side not upside.
Stevil
They have six legitimate starters and those six represented all but 1 start last season.
They can’t trade a single starter, yet alone two, without bringing another one in.
I think Seattle is more likely to add starting pitching they can stash in Tacoma than they are to trade one of them.
And they’d likely be selling low on Woo. His ceiling is high. Teams would use his health questions as leverage. There’s too much pitching available this offseason for me to believe a team would pay (high) for Woo’s potential.
Maybe things change at the deadline.
hllywdjff
One bargaining chip the Mariners have is Woo and Miller are so inexpensive and you see what these free agent starting pitchers are getting…. Boyd getting fourteen million dollars a year.?? Wow… So I would think teams would be salivating to get a pitcher like that for a million dollars a year.
Stevil
I think you might be looking at this backwards…
Teams would rather buy starting pitching than trade for it. That’s probably why we’re seeing decent deals for starters early.. Teams don’t want to sacrifice good hitters or elite prospects.
hllywdjff
So maybe the draft develop and trade philosophy of the Mariners is backwards in this day and age of baseball???? Just spend baby!
hllywdjff
Developing inexpensive pitching and buying cheap hitting doesn’t work because the pitching is too good in MLB
And if you don’t have good hitters to offset it then you’re going to have a terrible offense like we do and you cant win many games 1-0..
Stevil
Well, the problem for Seattle is that they haven’t developed much hitting. Julio is a generational talent and the only other hitter they’ve developed so far is Cal.
But they have been trading. They acquired Raley and Arozarena via trade. They just need a lot more. If they aren’t going to spend on FA bats,
hllywdjff
They can’t make every trade with tampa bay lol
Captainmike1
As a yankee fan I say
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
holycow16
Fine… we’ll trade Judge for Bellinger.
We can make it work.
Jean Matrac
“…the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money…”
If that’s not just posturing, Bellinger is a Cub in 2025.
Captainmike1
I thought it was a stupid signing by the cubs and I have been proven right as usual
YourDreamGM
Impressive. Where can we see this prediction at?
batteryoutlet
it wasnt a stupid signing either, even if he predict it
YourDreamGM
It was a awful contract. I find paying more than something is worth stupid.
batteryoutlet
you have no idea how markets work then
Jean Matrac
I was happy that the Cubs signed Bellinger. That’s because he was rumored to be signed by the team I root for. I breathed a sigh of relief.
DanielDannyDano
Bellinger will be a Toronto BlueJay. Atkins/Shapiro will be scrambling to spend Rogers’ money after they lose out on Juan Soto, hoping to strike gold in 2025while failing to re-sign Vladdy and Bo.
Astros_fan_in_Aus
Cubs trade Bellinger and pay $3M of his salary for the next two years. Astros trade Pressley who will cost them $14.5M for one year.
Cubs are $9M better off, and Astros increase their payroll by $9M.
Sounds fair to me.
texasbug
I am still praying that the Houston Astros get this player and he can help them back to the 2025 World Series.
KnicksFanCavsFan
Regardless of whether they resign Soto, they must address 1b, and whether it’s signing Walker, Santana, etc, they all cost extra in lux tax. Bellinger is at $27 per. Walker will likely be around the same but for at least 3 years. Maybe Santana can be had for around 1/ $20? Otherwise, you give Rice a shot at the job in ST with DJ as the fallback. I love what I see in Rice. It’s just a matter of what the Yanks think, and are they OK with breaking in two (Dominguez and Rice) or three rookies this year (Durbin had been mentioned as an option at 2b). I like all 3 rookies, but that’s a lot leaning on 5 young hitters in the lineup ( the other two being Wells and Volpe).
There’s a lot of options avail in FA or trade.
dasit
even with judge and soto doing MVP things a line-up including rice, wells, jasson, volpe and one of djlm/cabrera/peraza/durbin is a disaster waiting to happen. imo yankees need to sign both soto and adames and pray that jasson and rice take huge steps forward
KnicksFanCavsFan
@dasit
Well I don’t know if I’d call it a disaster but it may require the Yanks to go thru growing pains. Effectively what’s the plus/ minus of
replacing Torres, Verdugo and Rizzo for Rice, Durbin, Dominguez? Or lineup finished top 3 in almost every category except SB. But that’s without a full season of Jazz.
Well Hung
Bellinger for Strowman and Trevino?
Seaver rules
If the Mets can’t land Soto, I can see Stearns calling the Cubbies and make something happen.
aspenner27
Look, I don’t want him either but with fWAR roughly $11mil/1 fWAR his contract isn’t that crazy.
mlbnyyfan
Bellinger should have been a Yankees a few years ago instead of bringing back Rizzo. Would have cost money instead of prospects. I’m tired of seeing Yankees in false rumors. However let’s make a deal Pereira, Pereza and Trevino for Bellinger
batteryoutlet
trade nico and belli + prospect, get a top arm back, use the money for bullpen help, bring up the prospects and see what you got. the cubs had 26 blown saves last year, if they cut that number in half they have a playoff contending team
Goose
The Yankees need to get back to the 90’s mold. I wouldn’t sign Soto. I would go get Bellinger. In that lineup and park his bat is plus and he gives you a solid CF. Resign Torres to play 2B. Go sign or acquire a RH OF that is solid on defense. Sign Burnes or Fried for the rotation. Go get a defense orientated catcher. Go sign Bergman for 3B.
The problem with the current Yankees is they are like the 1980’s team. A handful of studs with a bunch of overpaid drop offs.
Big whiffa
It’s not his salary but the opt out that makes bellinger a hard stay away. There’s no way he doesn’t opt out at seasons end as he will get paid 5 mil to do so. And he’s going to bet on himself to perform so it’s unlikely he will consider an extension
So why acquire him for 1 season at 32.5 mil ?
batteryoutlet
its not a hard stay away (three teams are asking about him) its just a negotiating piece, cubs will probably have to give up more if they want to eat less salary or get a legit piece back. big market teams arent splitting hairs over 30 mil for a position player they determine they can definitely use for the season. Who else is signing a 1-2 year deal at his caliber in FA?
Big whiffa
I agree teams should be interested, but what motive do cubs have to trade him due to his negative trade value and need for his bat ?
batteryoutlet
The ‘negative value’ piece is overblown on these comments a bit – i dont think there’s a substantial factor in real life negotiations. Sure, he had a down year and will opt out if he does well this year. But at the time it was a great signing – the market changes and its the reason pitching is getting over paid this off season. but to your point, i dont see the cubs ACTUALLY doing this, jed isnt that smart. but there is talk and rumors – he’d look fine in a cubs uniform next year.
Big whiffa
1 season at 32.5 mil is negative value. He’s not passing on a 5 mil buyout to make 21 mil in 2026
Cubs will need to replace his bat in the lineup too. Tall order !
batteryoutlet
the negative value only means the trade will look different at the end of the day
Larry D.
If I’m a potential trade partner, no way am I taking on his entire salary. The Cubs want to ditch that money in the worst way and getting another team to pay for some of it, is better than getting stuck with all of it. Personally, I want him in the Cub lineup in 2025.
KnicksFanCavsFan
I think you guys are way overacting. Belli is still a good glove with a good bat. He’s only 29 and 1 year removed from an all- star caliber player. It’s only 1/$32.5 at worst for a non taxpayer.
Larry D.
Yeah, I agree. The Cubs are a better ball club with him. The real issue is the Cubs unwillingness to “up the ante” in free agency.
Mikenmn
Cubs acting if they have a low priced, team controlled jewel. Cashman, don’t.
buffalobob88
Bellinger for Stanton
mlbnyyfan
@Buffalo. If only that were true. All I want for Christmas is Stanton and DJL off my team. I’d get rid of both for a bucket of balls. The open roster spots are more valuable
Jean Matrac
Stanton has a NTC, and would veto that in a NY second.
KnicksFanCavsFan
@buff
Performance wise Belli is better than Stanton, contract wise Stanton’s is far worse than Belli’s. Stanton has like 4 years left. Wouldn’t make sense on the Cubs side.
❤️ MuteButton
Hopefully the Astros will take a hard pass
Ma4170
If the mets miss on Soto, i wonder if they would consider bellinger for baty. And would the cubs take a chance on a guy who was a top 20 mlb prospect in 2023? Prob no on both sides but im not sure cubs could expect much more if the other team takes on the whole salary.
UWPSUPERFAN77
One of the best Cubs! But anyone is tradable for the right price.!
mlbnyyfan
Bellinger gets traded to New York and Rizzo back to Chicago. That sounds like a great scenario.
SeanStL
He is the Cubs best chance at having a great bat in the lineup since they will not sign another long term contract, so he is a good fit. They will spend $200M this year so likely not still rebuilding. No good reason to get rid of him. If so, then they might as well trade give up on 2024 and signing Boyd shows they aren’t doing that.
Dumpster Divin Theo
Little interest in Mister Spicoli it would seem
MsFanWithPaperBag
Castillo, arozarano, hanger
4
Bellinger, hoerner, Suzuki
Who says no?
Dogbone
Anybody who follows baseball????
neurogame
Bellinger and extra money for Stroman?
KnicksFanCavsFan
I think the Yanks works be too and a prospect or 2 for that to happen. no one likes Dominguez, Rice or Durbin but still a prospect ot 2. Belli is still a good performer.
KCMOWHOA
Royals take Bellinger for the full contract but Cubs take Hunter Renfroe in return?
unglar
Yanks gotta get Soto. Bellinger would be good in addition but less necessary if they have Soto.
thomasg1951
Cody will not be an Astro. Over his dead body because of the cheating.
Buff Barnacles
A classic father/son Yankee footnote. Who here is old enough to remember Cody’s Dad Clay Bellinger playing for the Yankee’s?
oneiblnd
Let’s see if Soto defers his payments. Doughtful.
MLBTR needs to hire editors
For crying out loud, Adams. Your writing is terrible. This is wrong: “or, presumably, take back another contract.” You must put presumably at the end to avoid a dangling conjunction. Don’t bury the subject after multiple words, one of which doesn’t even belong.
Then there’s this disaster: “The Astros, too, have some luxury concerns.” “Too” is not just a replacement for “also,” which is the word you should be using there. Otherwise, “too” ends the sentence. Write in proper English, please.