After the club’s first losing season in six years, the Rays are headed into what figures to be a pivotal offseason for the club as they look to remain contenders in a highly competitive AL East division. As noted by Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times, one way the club could look to address its lackluster offense (29th in the majors in runs scored this year) this winter is by trading from their rotation depth to acquire a bat, even if that bat doesn’t address their reported offseason priority of improving the club at catcher.
For a Tampa club that enters the winter in serious need of an offensive boost, it’s hard to deny the logic in dealing from their deep group of available arms. Youngsters Taj Bradley, Shane Baz, and Ryan Pepiot all emerged as solid, affordable rotation options for the club this year, and Zack Littell’s first full season in a big league rotation seems to have established him as a quality mid-rotation option with one year to go before free agency.
Meanwhile, Jeffrey Springs returned to make seven solid starts for the club in the second half after undergoing Tommy John surgery early last year and Drew Rasmussen also rejoined the club’s pitching staff late in the year following his own 2023 elbow surgery. Rasmussen pitched primarily in a relief role this year, never throwing more than 38 pitches in an outing, but figures to be a rotation option for the Rays come Spring Training. That also figures to be the case for lefty Shane McClanahan, who went under the knife last August but figures to be ready for Spring Training as well.
With at least seven quality rotation options even after dealing away Aaron Civale and Zach Eflin at the trade deadline over the summer, it would certainly make sense for the club to explore dealing from that depth in order to address the offense. The Braves, Cubs, and Red Sox are all already known to be interested in adding rotation help this winter, while the Orioles and Mets are among the many other teams that could stand to benefit from adding a starter or two this winter as well. With even more clubs sure to look to bolster their pitching when the offseason fully gets underway following the World Series, the Rays should be well positioned to make a deal if they so choose.
Given the club’s small-market payroll and focus on long-term sustainability, it would be something of a surprise to see the Rays move on from any of Bradley, Baz, or Pepiot without recouping a similarly talented and controllable bat in return. On the other hand, it wouldn’t be a shock if clubs were hesitant to deal for McClanahan or Rasmussen given the former hasn’t pitched in more than a year while the latter hasn’t stretched out to start since returning from injury. That could leave Littell and Springs as the most likely candidates to be dealt this winter, with each hurler having various pros and cons as a trade candidate.
When it comes to Littell, the argument for dealing him is rather straightforward: the righty is only under team control through the end of the 2025 season and projects for a not insignificant $4.8MM in his final trip through arbitration according to MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz, so by dealing him the Rays could save a bit of money to address other areas of the roster while also potentially bringing in a more controllable player to complement their offense. With that being said, Littell’s status as a rental could dampen the return for his services somewhat on the heels of a 3.63 ERA campaign that was more solid than excellent.
If teams aren’t scared off by Springs’s lack of volume over the past few years, then, he might be able to bring back a more significant return. After all, the southpaw has been dominant when healthy with a 2.44 ERA and 3.10 FIP in 184 1/3 innings of work since 2022, when he first became a starter. Results that strong would be valuable to virtually any rotation in baseball, and Springs’s $21.75MM guarantee over the next two years lands in the sort of sweet spot that would make him a relative bargain for other teams while still clearing a significant financial burden off the books in Tampa, allowing Erik Neander and his front office to explore further upgrades in free agency even beyond what Springs would bring back in trade.
Big whiffa
7/8 starters isn’t enough in this day and age. Also, what a pitcher accomplished last season or any season prior is irrelevant. Might as well keep em all and sort it out next season
kc38
Well this is a horrible take lmao. Thank the lord you aren’t a gm
Big whiffa
I’m looking at espns cy young predictor. There’s 10 names in each league. Only 2 of 20 were on that list preseason. Burnes and wheeler.
Mic drop !
holecamels35
Good analysis and explanation of why he’s wrong. God forbid a team has more than 5 options to start.
One is coming off TJ, one is a converted reliever (actually 3 but further back), and Pepiot and Bradley aren’t that good. Insane to think they have a surplus. He’s right in letting it play out.
chemfinancing
I wouldn’t trade any of these starters time to muster up Tampa and do some signing for once
chemfinancing
In fact if they don’t sign Juan Soto everyone in that front office should just resign
bloomquist4hof
I would love that. If anything, just to see the collective reactions from the fans of the big market teams that missed out.
Canuckleball
Soto is expected to possibly get $500 million.
That would be equal to the total money spent on all members of the Rays major league rosters for the last 7 seasons combined.
Science fiction and fantasy movies and shows have lately done a lot of exploration of the concept of multiverses and alternate realities, yet in all the quintillions of possible realities that may exist, there isn’t a single one where Soto signs with the Rays.
Not one.
Yoyosoxsox
Are u sure?
User 4245925809
Tampa went hat in hand to the taxpayers of hillsborough county and they wouldn’t fork over any dough for a stadium, they “might” it looks like be able to get Pinellas to pay a portion for a replacement for the Thunderdome, but Tampa paying a primo FA? Go back 25y and the awful Greg Vaughn Contract
alwaysgo4two
Greg Vaughn? How about Vinnie Cashstealer, or even worse, Pat Burrell? Their history at signing FA isn’t great. Maybe they should stay the course.
Rexhudler86
Pat Burrell was a two year deal. Wasn’t anything that set them back for years. plus I was talking trades.
kc38
When did we implement the 7 man rotation?
Ranger Danger19
You can never have enough pitching. The Rangers used all of Eovaldi, Heaney, Scherzer, Gray, deGrom, Dunning, Bradford, Leiter, Rocker, Mahle, Urena for bits and pieces this year and it wasn’t enough. Death, taxes and injured pitchers are a given.
rememberthecoop
Cubs are interested in Springs.
johncal25
Cubs already have Steele and Imanaga in the rotation w Wicks as a swing guy. I would not want them trading for a lefty. And as the comment below states I really don’t want them trading with Tampa cause it rarely works out well.
mp2891
Paredes trade worked out ok for the Cubs. Paredes turned in a middling performance, which while not great was a lot better than Morel, who turned in the worst performance in the league after the deadline. Rays fans have totally given up on Morel and are just hoping the pitching prospects from that deal work out.
LaBellaVita
I don’t know how you define middling, but a third baseman who hits 86 wRC+ with a barely passable glove sounds easily replaceable.
MPrck
Has any team won trading with the Rays ? Hilarious.
Rexhudler86
@mprck someone could argue the croenworth trade, but the padres were trying to trade his contract last seasonand had no takers. So it’s probably a push
kc38
Cronenworth is horrible lol, you only know his name because of the market he plays in.
Rexhudler86
@kc38 didn’t say he was good.
Joe says...
When it comes to trading for a pitcher from the Rays it’s definitely “caveat emptor”.
chemfinancing
What about the Joe Ryan for Nelson Cruz swap?
chemfinancing
Blake Snell trade . Not sure trading arozarena was in their best interest
alwaysgo4two
It will be later. Arozarena was getting expensive for less production and a lot of swing and miss.
kc38
Randy is not a good player and is getting more expensive and less productive. Exactly how you shouldn’t run a team
alwaysgo4two
Hey!! I beat you by a minute!
mp2891
KC – Aroz isn’t a good player? Are you kidding me?
alwaysgo4two
Yes….Souza for Trey Turner. Not exactly a one for one, but not a good move.
Rexhudler86
@alwaysgo4two the padres traded him to the nationals.
CleaverGreene
3 team trade. Essentially, the Rays traded Bauers and RRivera for Souza. The Padres lost that trade.
mp2891
Lots of teams beat the Rays.in trades – The Snell trade was a total fleecing by San Diego. The Adam and Eflin trades this past deadline look bad for Tampa Bay. My personal favorite – A top 50 prospect last year for Civale. What a god awful trade that was.
jdgoat
The Rays have lost most of their big trades recently. The narrative that they don’t lose trades hasn’t really been relevant for about 5 years.
holecamels35
Padres getting Blake Snell worked out fantastic at least.
LaBellaVita
The point isn’t to win a trade. The point is to trade a surplus player for a player who will improve the team. The best trades are ones where both teams are happy with the outcome. Then, they will trade more, which will benefit both teams. The worst trades are where one team is so pissed off that they block the number when the other team calls. However, there is a limit. I don’t see the Rays trading with the Yankees or Red Sox. Even the trade with the O’s this season was a surprise.
EM41
7 starting pitchers is not a lot at all. Most teams use many more than that in a normal season
bloomquist4hof
I’m wondering if they sit on their pitching staff this year, or limit those types of trades. If they had someone who would bring in multiple cheap young players I think they’d do it, but trades from this group doesn’t feel like they’d get that, and would just weaken the pitching staff to fill another hole. I think and would be better off trading from the farm to address any current needs.
User 4245925809
Pepiot has front end talent, then he’s also had more than his share of injuries thus far as well. He’s the 1 of those 3 still believe would think worth giving up a considerable prospect talent for, not so much the other 2.
PronounsRUS
Stop letting the Cubs fan write articles about the Rays. Please.
raregokus
This is such an odd thing to care about.
PronounsRUS
I don’t. Some other clown thinks articles are bias. Blacky pink or whatever
raregokus
It’s not healthy to care about something as unimportant as MLBTR this much. Seek help.
PronounsRUS
You should have stopped after your first comment. I have no other choice but to destroy you now.
Rexhudler86
@raregokus he said that as black pink but he changed his name. He creates fake accounts to argue with himself. it’s either dedication or lunacy. he’s like the movie split but on a trade rumors site. Hopefully he gets paid in happy meals
Russell Branyan
While the Rays will likely use more than 7-8 starters next year, not everyone they use has to be a proven MLB commodity. The Rays have some backend/long relief options getting close to the majors, and have proven they can find/develop hidden gems.
For a team operating with their financial constraints, trading from their rotation makes sense to me.
positively_broad_st
Littell and Yandy to Pittsburgh for Bart and Bednar. It’ll free up some money for the Rays to add a bat in the outfield…
alwaysgo4two
As a Pirates fan I’d love that but also being more recently a Rays fan, NO!!
holecamels35
Rays aren’t the kind of team to trade for a reliever who’s making money in arbitration. Maybe Holderman and Davis/Endy but they’d be selling super low on either.
I do think Henry Davis is traded this offseason though.
kc38
So a good middle rotation guy and the reigning batting champ for a recently DFA catcher and a slightly abover average reliever? Genius.
positively_broad_st
Reigning? Both Bednar and Yandy took a step backwards in 2024. And you might want to check Bart’s numbers with Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh made a decent trade to get Bart as well. He wasn’t a waiver wire pickup…
CleaverGreene
Defensive numbers? #1 catchers need to catch. block, throw and frame.
mp2891
Bart had a career year in 2024, but it’s not like he suddenly morphed into a good backstop. He hit 121 wRC+ and provided 1.3 fWAR over 282 PAs. The Rays own Rortvedt turned in 87 wRC+ and 1.4 fWAR over 328 PAs. The difference – Defense! Rort is considered an above average defender, but he’s not exactly elite. So how bad is Bart behind the plate tf these guys have equivalent WAR with a huge difference in offense? The answer – bad enough that the Rays, who prize defense above everything else in catchers, won’t have any interest in him. As for Bednar, the Rays have a good Pen already. They don’t want or need Bednar.
mp2891
LOL… Pirate fans are funny
Russell Branyan
Gonna go out on a limb and guess you’re a Pirates fan.
cah011381
They’re looking for catching help, the Cardinals need young, controllable starting pitching, seems like a good match to me.
Blackpink in the area
The Cardinals don’t really need pitching. They need to give their young guys already in house a chance to play.
They could use Tre Morgan perhaps. Or Brayden Taylor. The Cardinals have no long term 3b in the system that’s probably their biggest weakness. Herrera for Taylor i would do.
cah011381
I think we’ve discovered recently you can never have too much pitching. A young 3B would be nice too, but I was kind of hoping Baltimore would come off Coby Mayo to get Helsley.
Blackpink in the area
Mayo makes sense but we don’t match up too great with the Orioles. They don’t need a catcher and don’t need lefty hitters like Donovan or Nootbaar. Also don’t need Romero.
cah011381
They need a closer though.
Blackpink in the area
For sure. Perhaps a 3 team deal. Would love to have Mayo. Probably need to trade Arenado first or in the 3 team deal.
BigV
I’d like for the Cardinals to check in on Littell,Baz,Springs. Littell is the one who will most likely be moved.
Blackpink in the area
I think the Cardinals need longer term assets. Bradley would be nice but doubt they trade him.
LaBellaVita
That is fine, but the Cards better offer something for a Rays pitcher. There was a “Viva El Birdos” article last year stating Tyler Glasnow was so worthless that the Cards should send the easily replaceable Burleson in exchange for Glasnow and Jason Adam. The Rays received a better offer.
greg1
And in other news, the sun is bright and water is wet! Don’t the Rays deal from their rotation depth every year?
PronounsRUS
Winn, Arenado plus cash, and a choice of Herrera or Contreras and cash for Deluca and Lopez.
Mike56
Cards aren’t trading Winn. You can forget that. There crazy to trade Herrara
mp2891
Don’t overthink this guys. Littell is in the last year of control. He will be traded this offseason if he isn’t extended. That will allow the Rays to enter the new season with Ras in the Pen, to be stretched out if needed, and a 5 man rotation of McClanny, Springs, Baz, Bradley and Pepiot, with prospects Seymour, Wilcox, Workman, and Rock waiting in the wings in AAA. Gotta remember that McClanny hasn’t returned to pitching yet from TJS, Springs has returned but ended the season on IL with elbow soreness (said to not be serious), and Rasmussen has had 2 TJS and an intensive internal brace procedure, making his return to the rotation iffy anyway. None of these guys can be traded for maximum value right now. The young guys (Baz, Bradley and Pepiot) won’t be traded either. Rays don’t trade good, young pitchers with multiple years of control.
Rays in the Bay
I disagree only about one thing. I think they extend Littell at a moderate amount and trade Springs. His value might not be as high as it can be but if Springs bombs then they won’t get anything for him. It’s safer (for the Rays) to trade him based on past performance in case he doesn’t get back to his performance before. Plus that could be a lot of dead cash if he ends up bombing or getting injured and Rays don’t like dead cash.
mp2891
Anything is possible with the Rays when it comes to players on “big” money deals, but I’m not sure the Rays can get anything for Springs. Ending the year on IL might have killed his trade value, and he’s too good (when healthy) to just give away, to say nothing of paying someone to take him.
Rays in the Bay
I guess it’ll depend on what offers they get. If teams low-ball then then they’ll probably just hang on to him. If they get an offer they like he’s as good as gone. Some times might be willing to overpay and bank on him having a healthy year rather than waiting for him to bounce back and cosy more at the deadline. I guess we’ll see in a few months what the Rays plan to do.
LonnieB
Springs to the Braves to replace max and throw Soler +$. Braves don’t need 2 DH that can’t play good D
LonnieB
Maybe even throw Arcia in as well if we pick up adames
mp2891
Arcia to the Rays makes a lot of sense to me if the Braves get Adames.
RaysFan1798
Personally I fully expect them to trade Littel, Springs and Yandy for Offensive upgrades and a Power hitting catcher
Rays in the Bay
Orrrr they could keep everyone and just add? They will use it as an excuse but in the end it will always be about cutting cash with current management. There are a few untouchables like McLanahan and Pepiot. But the more expensive veterans like Springs and Rasmussen are probably as good as gone. They will trudge out a rotation of Bradley, Baz, McLanahan, Littell, and Pepiot. If someone gets injured it’ll be ‘next cheap man up. Time to call Erasmo on speed dial’. Management isn’t looking to seriously compete next year, I’m almost sure about that.
mp2891
Ras is only projected to make $2MM next year, so he’s hardly expensive, and a rotation of McClanny, Baz, Bradley, Pepiot and Littell could be really good. I’m not at all pessimistic about the Rays pitching next year, even if they trade Littell. The bats are another story.
jbigz12
Rays will come up with another starter on the cheap from their system or elsewhere. They always seem to do it. Ian Seymour is big league ready as a depth option also. I’d bet they move 1 starter for a controllable bat coming off a subpar year. They’ll develop and look for undervalued talent.
Rays in the Bay
@jbigz Yeah that’s usually how it works, but the Rays are not always guaranteed to turn anyone into a productive pitcher. Last season was a struggle especially with Bradley and Maton and Armstrong.
Rays in the Bay
Thanks for the correction. I thought Rasmussen was making more than that. Yeah. I should have mentioned that I’m not all too worried about the pitching. The bats are pretty depressing to watch though…