Now that the trade deadline has come and gone, it's harder for contending clubs to upgrade their respective rosters. There are still a few ways to do so, as MLBTR's Steve Adams recently laid out, but most of those methods involve adding guys not currently rostered who are naturally depth pieces at best.
To add a solid, usable big leaguer, the best remaining path is waivers. The old August waiver trade system ended in 2019, but many veteran players found themselves on waivers last August anyway, which started with the Angels.
The Halos fell out of contention in August and their priority shifted from winning to ducking under the competitive balance tax. Since trades were no longer possible, they put a whole bunch of guys on waivers and just hoped that other clubs would take them, the baseball equivalent of putting a "for free" box by the curb. Lucas Giolito, Reynaldo López, Randal Grichuk, Matt Moore, Hunter Renfroe, Dominic Leone and Tyler Anderson were put on waivers and then other clubs followed suit, though to a less significant degree. The Yankees had no hope of avoiding the CBT but were slipping in the standings and had no use for an impending free agent like Harrison Bader. It was a similar situation with the Mets and Carlos Carrasco. The Tigers and White Sox weren't going to be CBT payors but made José Cisnero and Mike Clevinger available, simply hoping to cut costs.
Because the waiver priority order goes in reverse order of standings, the clubs best positioned to benefit were those just on the fringes of contention. The teams buried in the standings would have no motivation to grab such players and take on salary while the teams at the top of the standings would get last dibs in the waiver process. The Guardians claimed Giolito, López and Moore while the Reds grabbed Bader and Renfroe.
It doesn't seem like this trend will stop here in 2024. This year, Kevin Kiermaier, Ty France and Josh Bell have already been on waivers at some point. All three players cleared and were ultimately traded prior to the deadline, with some money changing hands in each of those deals. Others will surely follow them in the weeks to come, but clubs won't be able to work out trades involving cash considerations. The claiming club will have to take on all that's left of the contract from the waiving club.
Logically, these players will be available on waivers before the end of August. Players acquired after that time are not postseason eligible, which limits the attraction, though it could still happen. After the Guards fell from contention, they put Moore back on waivers just a few weeks after claiming him, and the Marlins nabbed him at that time. He made four scoreless appearances for Miami, helping them squeak into the playoffs, but wasn't eligible to join the club in the postseason.
So who could be available this time around? The most likely players are those making a notable salary on a club that could fall back in the playoff race, particularly one with CBT concerns. But an underwater contract won't be terribly appealing, so the player should still have some utility that makes it at least vaguely justifiable for the claiming club to take on some money. Many of these will require the team to really perform poorly in the next few weeks, making them long-shot possibilities, but let's take a look at some of the most interesting guys who could plausibly fit the bill.
Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription
- Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco.
- Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony.
- Remove ads and support our writers.
- Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker
tigertom0210
Is it just me, or is this a confusing article, especially the paragraph that starts “Logically…” which seems to start in 2024 but jump to last year when the Guards were out of the playoffs and the Marlins in.
Joshy
Giving an example of when a player is post season ineligible but shows the potential appeal or use of still claiming said player
mikevm3
Just bring back August trades to be honest
jdgoat
The Canha deal didn’t really make any sense to me for the Giants. He’d be a nice complimentary piece for a contender should he end up on waivers though.
foppert2
You answered your question. He was bought in as a complimentary piece. Ramos is/was hurting and Wade’s knees are a perpetual time bomb. The contender part is currently up for debate.
jdgoat
I thought the Giants were a lot further out to be honest. A few teams to jump but I guess it’s not a complete stretch to see them squeaking in.
oldgfan
I really don’t see them playing the waiver game as suggested. Conforto is in his last year anyway, so not much to save money wise if they fall out late.
mattwild1
he’s taking Wilmer Flores’ spot as a RHH platoon at 1B with Wade Jr.
Butter Biscuits
Can someone clear this up for me, so a contending team who has a borderline wild card playoff chance has the possibility to take on as many waivers before a team leading the division standings?
Blue Baron
Huh? Can you clear that up for me?
CarolinaCubsandKush
In theory, yes.
disadvantage
@butter
Yep. This paragraph in the article sums it up best:
Because the waiver priority order goes in reverse order of standings, the clubs best positioned to benefit were those just on the fringes of contention. The teams buried in the standings would have no motivation to grab such players and take on salary while the teams at the top of the standings would get last dibs in the waiver process. The Guardians claimed Giolito, López and Moore while the Reds grabbed Bader and Renfroe.
jvent
Hopefully the Mets can grab Matt Moore and Renfroe
Blue Baron
Maybe Moore. Renfroe is no better than Martinez, Bader, or Taylor.
Bill M
Those 2 are from last year’s list, when they were having decent seasons. Right now they have very little value