White Sox lefty Garrett Crochet continues to be one of the most interesting names in the lead-up to the deadline. With just over 24 hours left to go, it’s unclear if he will be traded at all, but plenty of teams are interested. He’s already been connected to the Dodgers, Phillies and Padres to varying degrees, with Jon Heyman of The New York Post adding Atlanta to the pile today on X. Travis Sawchik of theScore reported on X last week that the Sox would prefer not to trade Crochet within the division, so the odds of him landing with another A.L. Central team would appear to be low.
Crochet is fairly unprecedented as a trade candidate due to his unusual trajectory. He was quickly called up to the majors in 2020 when he was only 21 years old. The Sox kept him in a relief role the year after and he pitched fairly well, but then Tommy John surgery wiped out most of his 2022 and 2023 seasons.
That left him in a strange spot coming into 2024. He had only thrown 73 major league innings due to the missed injury time and another 12 1/3 in the minors as part of his rehab assignment while coming back from surgery last year. But he collected service time while on the injured list and crossed three years of service in 2023, qualifying for arbitration. Since he had hardly pitched, his salary only got bumped to $800K, barely above the league minimum.
The Sox stretched him out as a starter here in 2024 and the results have vastly outpaced any reasonable expectations. The lefty has thrown 114 1/3 innings, already eclipsing his workload over the four previous years combined. He has allowed just 3.23 earned runs per nine innings, striking out 34.6% of batters faced. He has also limited walks to a 5.6% clip and gotten grounders on 46.8% of balls in play.
Most clubs would be clinging tightly to a pitcher who suddenly became an ace at the age of 25 but there are also factors pushing him onto the trade block. As mentioned, he has already qualified for arbitration and has just two years of club control remaining beyond this one. The Sox are absolutely awful this year, despite Crochet’s contributions, with a 27-81 record that could see them finish as one of the worst clubs of all time.
Given the low point the Sox are at, it’s fair to wonder if they can be competitive again in their window of control over Crochet. They reportedly explored an extension with him but didn’t get far, so he’s likely more valuable to them as a trade chip than as a player.
An ace pitcher with a tiny salary and two extra years of club control should give Crochet massive trade appeal but there are also complications. With the limited workload that he carried into this year, it’s led to questions about the best way to press forward, with some suggesting a move to relief work down the stretch would be the best option.
According to reporting from last week, Crochet prefers to continue in a starting role, believing that would be best for his health. He would want to sign an extension with any new club before being moved to the bullpen.
Relievers work fewer innings than starters overall but they have to pitch more frequently and essentially on-call. Perhaps Crochet believes he can better prepare his body for the regular schedule of starting, whereas bullpen work could involve pitching at any time, even on back-to-back days. It’s also possible that he and his reps are simply trying to leverage the trade interest into locking in some financial security, which is understandable. For a guy that has already missed significant time, it would be nice to have some money in the bank before a club leans on him heavily for a World Series run.
That could perhaps scare off some clubs that don’t want to both send significant prospects to Chicago and also commit notable dollars to Crochet. However, Jack Harris of the Los Angeles Times reports today that the Dodgers don’t view the extension as an obstacle.
This situation is somewhat analogous to the Tyler Glasnow circumstances from the offseason. While not exactly the same as Crochet, he had some workload concerns and was available in trade, though the Rays reportedly made an extension a condition of trade talks. In the end, the Dodgers sealed the deal, sending Ryan Pepiot and Jonny DeLuca to the Rays for Glasnow and Manuel Margot and locking Glasnow up through 2028.
It’s understandable why they might want to go down that path again, given their pitching challenges. Dustin May and Emmet Sheehan both required season-ending surgeries while Walker Buehler and Yoshinobu Yamamoto are each on the injured list as well. Bobby Miller struggled so bad that he got optioned down to the minors.
The club’s current rotation is fronted by Glasnow and Clayton Kershaw. Glasnow has a spotty health track record while Kershaw just returned from a lengthy absence due to shoulder surgery. They are backed up by three rookies in Gavin Stone, River Ryan and Justin Wrobleski. General manager Brandon Gomes has said the club is looking for “impact” additions and Crochet would certainly qualify. They already have lined up with the Sox on one major trade today, a three-team blockbuster that also involved the Cardinals.
Crochet’s modest salary is certainly part of the appeal for the Dodgers, as they are slated to be third-time payors of the competitive balance tax and are currently over the top tier. That means they will pay a 110% tax on any money they take on, so someone like Crochet would be more appealing than a veteran who is already making eight figures annually. The theoretical extension would increase his cost but the new deal would start in 2025 and wouldn’t impact his current CBT hit.
Turning to Atlanta, they have their own rotation challenges. Spencer Strider is out for the season due to UCL surgery while Max Fried, Hurston Waldrep and Huascar Ynoa are also on the IL at the moment. Reynaldo López was removed from his most recent start due to forearm tightness and is slated for an MRI.
That leaves them with a rotation nucleus consisting of Chris Sale and Charlie Morton. Sale is having a great season but missed most of the previous four years due to injury and is now 35 years old. Morton is 40 years old and his strikeout rate has been declining for four straight years. Spencer Schwellenbach has been filling in nicely but has ten big league starts to his name.
Adding Crochet in there would obviously be appealing and Atlanta is not afraid to sign extensions, having given multi-year pacts to most of their roster. Crochet’s minimal salary at present is also appealing on account of their CBT status. RosterResource has them at $273MM, just under the third CBT tier of $277MM. Going over that line would result in their top 2025 draft pick being bumped back ten spots, as well as an increased taxation rate.
As for the report that the Sox don’t want to move him within the division, that’s perfectly understandable. Most clubs don’t want to see their best players thriving on clubs that they play more often than others and the Sox should have plenty of suitors even while crossing a couple of teams off the list.
The Royals have a fairly strong rotation and just traded for Michael Lorenzen today, so they will probably be focused on adding offense in the days to come. The Twins and Guardians could use some rotation help but it seems they may have to shop in the non-Crochet aisle. The market also features such guys as Yusei Kikuchi, Jameson Taillon, Cal Quantrill and others.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
Crochet and sale would be an insane tandem
tigers182
The Braves have nothing worth offering except injured pitchers.
Idosteroids
we have injured positional players too.
Dong Drysdale
Exactly. They have nothing to offer for most pieces. They should be looking for guys to eat innings lol not “ace” type guys. Gotta stay realistic.
Fenway 1
Not what the braves need with how much injuries are crippling them this year
RunDMC
2 addt years of cheap control.
Not far from his home in MS.
Already asking for an extension.
He’s Chris Sale Jr.
Fried is gone to after this year (and Morton)…ATL is upgrading at pennies on the dollar
I get he’s already has a career-high in IP, but he’s not a rental.
RunDMC
You can say that about every. single. pitcher. today. Why not just shutter the franchise and go into real estate then?
BravesFan2024
Crochet is an upgrade over Fried?
I will agree though Fried is gone because they clearly have no intent resigning him. It’ll be another step back in the end. Freeman to Olson step back. Swanson to Arcia step back. Now Fried to Crochet step back.
Braves are sinking themselves with death by a thousand cuts instead of surrounding the team with reliable pieces. Reliability might cost a little more but you know what you’re seeing the effects of cutting corners this year. Olson has been awful because he’s going to be a player who has ups and downs, unlike Freeman. And Arcia has fallen off the map because he was never the type of offensive threat he managed to show last year.
And Crochet? More of the same. Sure at his best he’ll replace Fried fine. But will he be at his best consistently the way Fried is more likely to be? Undoubtedly not.
Sad they continue to let everyone leave and refuse to replace with at least something of an equal talent. It’s always smoke and mirrors to give fans like RunDMC something to hold onto.
RunDMC
@Braves2024 — Yes, let’s pay Fried is asking price with now 2 straight years of forearm issues.
‘Something of equal talent’?? to future-HOF Freddie Freeman?? When did you apply to be a GM, b/c you should if you think replacing a HOF/franchise icon is possible. They had a record-setting offense (2023) without Freeman, almost breaking the franchise record in wins last year.
Swanson is a 0.9-bWAR plater in Year 2 of a $177M deal…and Braves missed out?? I get Arcia’s is on the struggle bus, but it doesn’t mean they were wrong in not giving a blank check to Dansby just like they shouldn’t to Fried – especially after forearm issues in consecutive years.
Let me know when you need a reference for that GM application.
NashvilleJeff
The most reliable take on the Braves is a clueless post by 2024. Forest for the trees…………
BravesFan2024
Then don’t replace Freeman is the idea there Einstein.
Braves shipped off players and extended Olson instead of just nudging up a little higher to secure Freeman.
You really are slow
BravesFan2024
PS Freeman outplayed Olson during their “record breaking year”
Or did you miss that? More likely just have your head so far in the sand had no idea.
Freeman MVP voting = 3
Olson MVP voting = 4
Even in Olson’s better seasons for us he’s a step behind Freddie. But please enjoy another first round exit from the playoffs with a team that continues to get a little bit less talented every year.
For the third straight year Freeman will place in the top 10 of MVP votes and Olson will miss getting a vote entirely for 2 out of 3 seasons.
I’ll keep waiting for Olson to catch up because you all promised this was the better long term solution. Probably having some regrets about all that he’s younger and will last longer rhetoric you and others spewed. And don’t even try to deny you spewed it. Own it like an adult. I know you in particular boasted about how long term having the younger player was a smart move.
This is gonna be an ugly contract by the time he’s 32. Meanwhile Freeman might dip out of the top 10 MVP votes after he hits 36 two years from now.
SocoComfort
Yea the Braves have really never been in the business of over paying and when they have like BJ Upton, it usually blows up in their face. These guys Fried, Swanson and Freeman all want or wanted to test the open market. That’s fine but the Braves are not going to chase them in a biding war. That’s not how they typically operate. Swanson’s numbers this year are very similar to Arcia but Arica is a lot cheaper. You seriously wanted the Braves to replace freeman with an equal level talent?? Olson was the best available option at the time for a replacement. Pache is hitting .210 with the Phillies, Langliers is batting .213 with 20 Hrs for the A’s. They didn’t give up prospects that would have made a major impact with the Braves to get Olson.
NashvilleJeff
@2024: Freeman signed w/the Dodgers because he wanted to return home to be near his family—and he’s said that was a strong factor in his decision to sign w/LA.. You have no evidence that all the Braves had to do was try “nudging up a little higher to secure Freeman.”
SalaryCapMyth
He answered your question when he said every pitcher is an injury risk. They all do it at some point now. Being able to point to pitchers that don’t have innings limits doesn’t change that.
johnrealtime
“There’s a difference between every pitcher inevitably having an arm injury and this particular pitcher who throws 100 MPH and who has never been healthy for any length of time.”
Crochet has had one injury. Granted it led to TJS, but it is pretty early to call him injury prone, especially when nearly every pitcher these days has that surgery at some point. I see no reason to believe that he is going to have another major injury, unless they run him into the ground this year
gorav114
To late for them
VonPurpleHayes
They hold the number 1 WC spot. Too late? Lol
gorav114
I commented on the wrong thing and it won’t let me delete
Bart Harley Jarvis
@gorav114,
VPH owes you an apology for his sick burn.
VonPurpleHayes
Ahh. I see. I apologize for my sick burn. Bart is right.
getrealgone2
I don’t see it happening.
olereb
If I was AA, I would proceed with caution. He has never been a starter excluding this year. Max, is the best lefty starter, really like to have him going forward. To win the WS, a team has to have 3 starters to lead the way. It’s a roll of the dice if they stay healthy
Admin3 MLBrumormill
Fried, Sale, Morton, Lopez and Crochet is a solid playoff rotation. Lopez can probably go to relief if need be in postseason.
RunDMC
Considering how great Schwellenbach has looked in high-pressure games (vs. PHI, vs. NYM), I’d consider giving him a look in the playoffs and manage his IP until then. Guy seems to thrive the most when the competition is the best (fist pump).
yallhaters
Why tf would you keep Morton in the rotation over Lopez
Howiedoin
Charlie is a pretty respectable postseason pitcher.
DraftTheFarm
Sale, Lopez, Fried, Crochet then Morton or Schwellenbach to finish off the rotation.
yallhaters
He was a starter in college…
provoker
He’s going to the Guardians for Logan Allen and a prospect
mlb fan
Garret Crochet is also negotiating for a statue outside the stadium and his number immediately being retired by any team he’s traded to.
Yankee Clipper
I can’t wait for the Crochet presser if he’s traded and no extension has been reached….
Ken Rosenthal: “So, how does this trade affect your plans to pitch in October without an extension in place. Do you have a message for AA?”
Crochet (in Mike Tyson’s voice): “Thine the contract, big boy, thine the contract”
Acoss1331
Clip,
That made me laugh harder than I thought lol
GooseGoslinGuy
What am I missing? Why would the White Sox, the worst team in baseball, trade a 25-year-old starting pitcher with tons of upside. For the short term, pitching is the ONLY way they improve their fortunes.
RunDMC
To get more high-upside arms (and other) that have more years of control than Crochet’s 2+ years that better fit CHW’s competitive window, and maybe less injury history that he also has that presents more risk than most, if they hold onto him. Also, all this applies to Luis Robert, he also has his fair share of upside and injury history.
mlb fan
“What am I missing”…Because the Sox are not one excellent pitcher away from contention, so why not try to turn that excellent pitcher into 2 or 3 useful players for the future? Not to mention Crochet’s lack of prior innings and the shelf life of pitchers being so fragile and fleeting. The Chisox are not currently playing for the “short term”, but the future.
Piratepete7
Despite him being incredible this year they’re still unbelievably bad.
The White Sox window won’t open until this guy’s contract is over.
Acoss1331
White Sox won’t look competitive for another two or three years at the earliest. Getz needs to trade everything with value and obtain more prospects for tryouts.
Dong Drysdale
Atlanta has no prospects that could net a top end starter. They should be looking to sell assets and build up for upcoming seasons. The majority of the roster is injured and signed long term. This trade doesn’t help much and they’d give away what little prospects they currently have. I’d sell bullpen pieces high and even listen to offers for Ozuna. They’re stuck with long term deals (while most are team friendly) and not going to do much this season even if they sneak in. The Mets have shown that you can sell and stay competitive.
RunDMC
‘The Mets have shown that you can sell and stay competitive’
It helps when you have a MLB-high payroll ($315M in ’24) or $65M more than PHI and $82M more than ATL (already on a record-high). Uncle Steve spending almost one-third a billion dollars so they can be ‘competitive’.
Dong Drysdale
Atlanta also has a high payroll and could easily sell assets like Ozuna to rebuild for their future. You people can’t understand nuance. I get you’re biased (I’m an ATL fan as well), but this team has so much invested in long term players that are either hurt or simply untradable at this time.
Bullpen pieces/Ozuna/etc. could be dealt to build for the future. The Mets sold off arms and ate salary to rebuild and made some smart off-season moves. If you’re not keeping Ozuna into his late 30s or Fried beyond this year, why sit on the assets? Same could be said for Minter. If he’s not a long term signing (ATL probably won’t offer what he’ll get on the open market) why not move them? It’s just smart. In their 90s run, they held on too long to aging pieces to just win division titles.
RunDMC
Ozuna has been the ONLY consistent bat in ’24, and he has an affordable option. No one would take him last year, but NOW teams are beating down the door to take on a guy that some teams may have questions about (his off-the-field history)? I don’t think you’re getting enough near-term pieces to justify taking the only reliable bat that could be a MVP-finalist this year that you know meshes with your clubhouse.
Minter is the only piece you may get something from that’s going to FA, but you’re not getting much for him to justify it. ATL doesn’t have a lot to sell off, that’s healthy.
Why hang onto Ozuna? He’s on-pace for a 5-WAR season for $18M. He’ll make less next season (if they pick-up his $16M option), so why would you trade that potential value? He’s also stated he’d be interested in an extension, so they could possibly use that as leverage for a few a little more control at a fair price. I don’t think he’d be seeking a 4 year deal, like you’re claiming, unless wins the MVP this year.
Dong Drysdale
You’re trying to play both sides with Ozuna. If teams “worry” about his off the field issues, Atlanta would’ve dumped him before he rediscovered his swing. He’s going to be 34 this offseason. With Acuña’s leg injuries, he’s more than likely the long term DH moving forward. Ozuna would have a very high asking price. You’re thinking too much like a fan and not a GM. Holding onto to ages pieces near the end of their deals does nothing for your organization.
They don’t have to blow the team up, but they lack pieces to bring in any high upside players. They could easily sell a few assets and build and still contend in a weak wild card race. All the teams in the wild card race are about the same.
Signing Ozuna until he’s 38+ and letting all your potential FAs walk (instead of moving them for pieces) is how you end up in a full rebuild. AA is smart and will figure it out, but you can’t be delusional about things.
Appalachian_Outlaw
Atlanta has prospects that could net a top end starter, they’re just mostly SP. I honestly don’t believe Crochet gets dealt right now, though. This is probably Chicago seeing IF they can get someone to drastically overpay, and Atlanta exploring the cost. This *might* build the framework for an off-season deal, however.
Atlanta should not sell. When you have a chance, no matter how slim, you don’t just punt. Plenty of teams go on unexpected runs in the playoffs.
Dong Drysdale
They really don’t have the elite tier guys that other teams have and they can’t eat much salary right now due to their payroll. How is this difficult for yall to understand?
If the Dodgers want someone, they’ll get them. Same for the Yankees. The Braves have a talented team, but a weak farm system and no payroll flexibility. AA is dumpster diving for Soler and Jackson simply due to SF eating salary in a dump.
Bart Harley Jarvis
How does AA get top talent in exchange for subpar prospects? What’s he some sort of svenjolly?
Dong Drysdale
In the past: he takes damaged goods or is willing to eat modest salary in rentals.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Or is it because he has a cheerful mental hold on some of his counterparts?
PhilliesFan91
Come on Dombrowski
dmbphils27
Yes… lets go Dave! Do not let him go to ATL!
TradeAcuna
Get it done, AA