The Diamondbacks followed up their surprising pennant run with an active offseason. They’re still long shots to challenge the Dodgers in the NL West, but they go into 2024 with clear expectations of a second consecutive playoff berth.
Major League Signings
- LHP Eduardo Rodríguez: Four years, $80MM (deal includes mutual/vesting option for 2028)
- LF Lourdes Gurriel Jr.: Three years, $42MM (deal includes opt-out after 2025 and club option for 2027)
- DH Joc Pederson: One year, $12.5MM (including buyout of 2025 mutual option)
- LF Randal Grichuk: One year, $2MM (including buyout of 2025 mutual option)
2024 spending: $35MM
Total spending: $136.5MM
Option Decisions
- Team declined its end of $5MM mutual option on RHP Mark Melancon in favor of $2MM buyout
Trades and Claims
- Acquired 3B Eugenio Suárez from Mariners for RHP Carlos Vargas and C Seby Zavala
- Claimed RHP Collin Snider off waivers from Royals (later lost on waivers to Mariners)
- Traded CF Dominic Fletcher to White Sox for minor league RHP Cristian Mena
Notable Minor League Signings
- Logan Allen, Albert Almora, Elvis Andrus, Tucker Barnhart, Humberto Castellanos, José Castillo, Dakota Chalmers, Dylan File, Kyle Garlick, Ronaldo Hernández, Brandon Hughes, Ricky Karcher, Kevin Newman
Extensions
- None
Notable Losses
- Austin Adams, Diego Castillo (lost on waivers), Tyler Gilbert, Kyle Lewis (non-tendered), Evan Longoria (still unsigned), Melancon (still unsigned), Tommy Pham (still unsigned), Vargas, Zavala
The Diamondbacks came up a little short of the second championship in franchise history. After clinching the National League’s last playoff spot on the final weekend of the season, they knocked off the Brewers, Dodgers and Phillies en route to the Fall Classic. The Rangers put a stop to that run with a five-game triumph in the World Series, yet the Snakes went into the offseason seeking to build on that finish.
Arizona’s first order of business was to reward their longtime manager. Within the first few days of the offseason, the Snakes signed Torey Lovullo to an extension running through 2026. Now the third-longest tenured manager in the NL, Lovullo seemed as if he might be on the hot seat as recently as 2022. The front office stuck by him through three straight losing seasons in 2020-22 and was rewarded for that patience last year.
Once Lovullo’s contract was settled, GM Mike Hazen and his staff set about strengthening the roster. It wasn’t lost on the front office that their regular season performance — which is likely a better predictor of the future than their small-sample postseason run — was merely fine. Arizona went 84-78 and was outscored by 15 runs. They had clear areas to address in the middle of the rotation and at third base. The impending free agency of left fielder Lourdes Gurriel Jr. was another question.
Third base was the first domino to fall. While they were linked to free agents Jeimer Candelario and Justin Turner within the offseason’s first couple weeks, they turned to the trade market. Arizona dealt hard-throwing reliever Carlos Vargas and third catcher Seby Zavala to the Mariners for Eugenio Suárez. While Vargas is an interesting developmental flier, the biggest appeal for Seattle was offloading the $13MM which Suárez is owed this year — taking the form of an $11MM salary and a $2MM buyout on a $15MM club option for 2025.
Arizona bought a declining asset to some extent. After topping 30 homers in both 2021 and ’22, Suárez hit 22 longballs a season ago. He led the American League in strikeouts for a second consecutive year, punching out 214 times. His .232/.323/.391 batting line was almost exactly league average after accounting for the extreme pitcher-friendly nature of Seattle’s T-Mobile Park. It was his third average or worse offensive showing in the past four years.
Even if Suárez is trending downward as he nears his 33rd birthday, he’s an upgrade over utility types like Emmanuel Rivera and Jace Peterson. Moving to Chase Field should offer a boost to his power production. He draws plenty of walks and is a capable defensive infielder. There’ll be plenty of strikeouts, but that’s a trade-off Arizona was willing to accept to add a righty power bat to a lineup that has been built largely around athletic contact hitters.
They followed up with their big strike for rotation help at the Winter Meetings. The D-Backs landed Eduardo Rodríguez on a four-year, $80MM pact. It’s the franchise’s biggest free agent investment since the ill-fated Madison Bumgarner deal from 2019. Rodríguez’s contract generally aligned with expectations and adds a needed mid-rotation arm.
The southpaw turned in a career-low 3.30 ERA with solid strikeout and walk marks in 26 starts for the Tigers last year. He’s familiar with Hazen and Lovullo from their time with the Red Sox, addressing any concerns they might have had after Rodríguez missed a chunk of 2022 attending to a personal matter and vetoed a deadline deal to the Dodgers last summer. He pairs with Merrill Kelly as mid-rotation arms behind ace Zac Gallen. That knocks Brandon Pfaadt into the fourth starter role that had been so problematic last year, both in the regular season and into October.
One can still quibble with the starting pitching depth, but the front office felt the bigger priority after landing Rodríguez was building out the lineup. They stuck with Gurriel in left field, bringing him back on a three-year, $42MM guarantee that allows him to opt out after the second season. Retaining Gurriel and adding Suárez addressed their desire for right-handed bats but still hadn’t satisfied the goal of bringing in a full-time designated hitter.
For that, they turned to lefty-swinging Joc Pederson. The D-Backs brought in Pederson on a one-year, $12.5MM deal. He’s coming off an unspectacular .235/.348/.416 showing for the Giants. Arizona is betting on Pederson to recapture something closer to his excellent 2022 form. He raked at a .274/.353/.521 clip with San Francisco two seasons ago.
Pederson’s hard contact rate remains elite and he posted better strikeout and walk numbers last year than he had in ’22. He’s a limited player — he should be shielded from lefty pitching and is best served as a DH only — but he should hit in the middle third of the lineup when opponents start a right-hander.
Suárez, Rodríguez, Gurriel and Pederson are the four big acquisitions (or retentions, in Gurriel’s case) of the offseason. The Snakes brought in a couple veterans to deepen the bench. They guaranteed Randal Grichuk $2MM, indicating he’ll serve as a right-handed hitting depth outfielder and perhaps a complement to Pederson in the DH slot. Grichuk clobbered lefties in 2023 and has a strong track record against them, making him a sensible fit in that role. Two-time Gold Glove winner Tucker Barnhart inked a minor league pact. He has a good chance to surpass José Herrera as the backup to franchise catcher Gabriel Moreno.
The only other notable transaction was a swap of young players with the White Sox. Arizona dealt lefty-hitting outfielder Dominic Fletcher to Chicago for pitching prospect Cristian Mena. The D-backs have subtracted a couple fringe outfielders via trade — they included Dominic Canzone as part of the Paul Sewald return last summer — reflecting the depth they have on the grass.
Gurriel is locked into left field. Defending Rookie of the Year Corbin Carroll will handle the other corner. Defensive stalwart Alek Thomas will man center field. Jake McCarthy is still on hand as a depth option who can play all three outfield spots. Grichuk can play some center field as well, although Arizona’s collection of talented young defenders means he’s likely to spend the majority of his time in a corner or at DH.
Fletcher still has two options remaining, so the Snakes could have kept him in Triple-A Reno. He’s already 26 and wasn’t going to have a clear path to everyday playing time at Chase Field, however. It made more sense to flip to the White Sox, where he entered camp with the leg up on the starting right field job. That allowed the D-backs to bolster their rotation depth, a comparative weak point for Arizona.
Mena, 21, has yet to make his MLB debut. He’s on the 40-man roster and briefly reached Triple-A last season. The 6’2″ righty spent the bulk of the year in Double-A, where he turned in a 4.66 ERA with an impressive 27.9% strikeout rate but an 11.3% walk percentage. He’s still developing as a strike-thrower, but scouting reports praise his curveball and potential for command improvement. Mena could reach the majors at some point this year.
That’s unlikely to be on Opening Day. He’ll likely slot behind Ryne Nelson, Slade Cecconi and Tommy Henry in the battle for the fifth rotation spot. It’s not a great group and an injury to any of the top four starters could stress the pitching staff. If the Diamondbacks are in contention at the deadline, acquiring rotation depth could again be a summer goal.
Lovullo could lean heavily on the bullpen to help cover for some of the unproven arms at the back of the starting staff. Arizona enters 2024 with the strongest on-paper relief group they’ve had in years. The Sewald trade is a big part of that, although they’ve also been aided by the unheralded Ryan Thompson pickup and steps forward from Kevin Ginkel and Andrew Saalfrank.
The D-backs didn’t make a single major league acquisition to the relief group. Hazen suggested early in Spring Training they could still look for depth additions given the volatility of relief pitching (link via Alex Weiner of Arizona Sports). Still, it was far less of a priority than it had been in the last few offseasons. Non-roster lefties Brandon Hughes and José Castillo are the most significant pickups thus far.
Arizona also inked a couple minor league contracts to bolster the infield depth. Kevin Newman and Elvis Andrus are in camp as non-roster shortstops. Lovullo has already declared Geraldo Perdomo his starter at the position. One of Andrus or Newman should make the team as a backup.
Aside from Perdomo, prospects Jordan Lawlar and Blaze Alexander are the only other shortstops on the 40-man roster. It’s better to get Lawlar everyday playing time in the upper minors than to use him sparingly off the major league bench. Alexander has yet to make his MLB debut and struck out at an elevated 27.2% clip in Triple-A. Lawlar might be the first option up if any of the starting infielders suffer an injury. At full health, the D-backs will run a primary group of Christian Walker, Ketel Marte, Perdomo and Suárez around the dirt.
Walker, one of the sport’s more quietly productive first basemen, is now a year away from free agency. He and Sewald are the team’s top rentals. Both players are approaching their mid-30s, so the front office might not have much urgency to keep either off the open market. Walker told the Arizona Republic’s Nick Piecoro last month that there hadn’t been much talk about an extension, although he indicated he was open to that conversation.
If the front office were to consider extension targets, they might prefer to secure a younger member of the core. They successfully inked Carroll to a $111MM deal last spring, cementing the star outfielder as the face of the franchise. Moreno, who hit .284/.339/.408 in his first full big league campaign, would be the most obvious target for similar overtures this spring. Arizona would presumably love to keep Gallen around for the long haul, but that’s a much taller task. The Cy Young finalist is two years from free agency and trending towards a massive contract.
Whether or not the Diamondbacks can work out long-term deals with anyone this spring, they’ll go into the season with more optimism than they’ve had in years. Their active offseason has pushed their player payroll around $144MM, as calculated by RosterResource. While middle-of-the-pack by league standards, that’s the highest mark in franchise history.
Few people will predict Arizona to close what was a 16-game gap with Los Angeles even before the Dodgers’ offseason spending spree. Anything short of another Wild Card berth would count as a disappointment, though. The Diamondbacks raised expectations in October. Adding Rodríguez, Suárez and Pederson only bolsters that.
Fraham_
Oh yeah love this series!
Hotdog 2
The worst ws team in the last 50 years. Huge fluke. They won’t win 80 this year
mlb fan
“The worst ws team”…I’m guessing your team flopped, so you’re bashing on successful teams right?..And we won’t hear back from you if and when the Dbacks make the playoffs right?
Hotdog 2
It wouldn’t matter if “my team” was the rangers or the mets, truth is the truth. You shouldn’t be a team partisan pass the age of like 21 anyway.
Tigers3232
How is that the truth?? They had a better record than the 06 Cardinals just off top of my head and they were not swept. So just arbitrarily claiming them as worst WS team in 50 years is anything but a statement of fact.
RunDMC
“You shouldn’t be a team partisan pass [sic] the age of like 21 anyway.”
Fans can only be kids? Pro sports wouldn’t exist then, knowing how reliant it all is on the disposable incomes of adults tapping into their adolescence.
Tigers3232
@Hotdog Shouldn’t be team partisan past the age of 21?? Most of us fans grow up watching a particular team more than any other and develop a life log connection.
Man you just double down on the ignorant comments…
BlueSkies_LA
I won’t get into the “worst team” argument one way or another, and I give the D’backs a lot of credit for their postseason successes. Still a team that scores fewer runs than they allow over the course of a season isn’t making a great case to be the last team standing.
mlb fan
“Making a great case”…This isn’t a courtroom and teams don’t have to “make a case” to go to the World Series, my friend. All they have to do is do it, just like the Dbacks went to the World Series last year.
BlueSkies_LA
Sheesh, you win the too literal award for today.
I thought this was clear enough, but if it isn’t, try this on: looking at the list of teams that made the playoffs last year, would you pick the team that scored fewer runs than it allowed as the most likely big winner?
Does that work for you?
zack novotny
What’s your point, they got to the WS and they were expected to win 77 games… They proved that you don’t have to spend all the money to win. They proved that team chemistry and playing together means a lot? I went to game 3-4 of the NLCS for my bachelor party and it was the best time of my life to come back and win both of those games. I think if anyone put them down then their are just jealous lol.
They defeated the odds and played great team baseball, better than the Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, and even the Braves.
It’s also about making the right moves and getting hot at the right time, I’d much rather win 86 and get into the WC hot then to win 105 and be cold in September. La Russa was great at that.
Hotdog 2
“if anyone put them down they are jealous” lol. It is baseball. No one over the age of like 21 should give 2 f#$&+ if a team wins or loses. Childlike thinking
mlb fan
“Child like thinking”….You’re just another negativity at all costs hater, right hotdog?…I’ll bet you’re a real riot at parties, always thinking of creative ways to rain on everyone’s parade, right hotdog?
zack novotny
So I shouldn’t care if the team I have watched for 16 years of my life growing up going to games. Helping encourage me to love the game of baseball? Bro you are nuts – if you’re not a fan and don’t care at all about baseball why are you commenting on this post at 10am on a Thursday. Hilarious.
G-lo
Sounds like an awesome bachelor party, Zack! Hopefully married life is as amazing as those games!
acoss13
I’ll admit, there’s some luck involved with the playoffs, but to dismiss the playoff run the 2023 Diamondbacks had is a bit much. They got past teams that were supposed to be better than them, and made it all the way to face the eventual champions.
Homer_Heins
“Worst team” in your eyes, but that makes the three teams they beat look pretty pathetic. The best team wins. That’s the way it works. Obviously, there’s a difference when averaged over 162 and all those days, but the championship has always been about the playoffs. This “worst team” argument is stupid. Those three championship Giants teams weren’t “good” on paper but they were built for October and had Posey’s leadership. Notice how great (Championship) teams have a top catcher, overall defense, and solid bullpen. On those metrics, the Dbacks are pretty stellar.
TAKERDBACKS
Diamondbacks are the fastest team to ever win a WS and played great last year in the playoffs. Why cause we don’t buy our team we are a bad team? WHen you see carrol and lawlar and blaze doing great soon you will eat your words. It’s not easy to compete with a team like dodgers or padres who spend a countries worth of salary. We grow our players the right way.
YaGottaBelieveAgain
IMHO I think AZ as currently constructed wins about 85 wins.
IF one of their young pitchers really shows improvement OR they get 1 more C+/B- SP they could win closer to 90. I think they have created good depth where they can platoon R vs L hitters and survive _”some” _injuries
YaGottaBelieveAgain
I forgot to include I didn’t love the signing of Pederson and Grichuk but they were trying to balance out R vs L handed hitters and they had a certain budget they wanted to stay under.
In retrospect Urshela, Eddie Rosario and JD Martinez or now trade for JD Davis seems a good value
IF Cease finally gets traded I believe BAL can put together the best package of prospects BUT I read somewhere there was speculation AZ would try for Cease especially if price drops a little.
NO Time like the Present . . .
Carpe Diem R.I.P Sir Robin Williams
Live Like You Were Dying ___ Tug’s son Tim sings
JRamHOF
The 2007 Rockies have something to say
No Salary Cap For You! (Come Back One Year)
Though they only won 1 game, they were a better world series team then the 21 others that were swept.
Plugnplay
Who cares who the worst runner up is, they didn’t win it all. Even thou it wasn’t the D Backs.
Now, the worst Champion in the last 50 years is good debate, but not really. The ’89 Dodger’s easily take the cake. There last non-asterisk championship.
C Yards Jeff
They made the Series with a negative regular season run differential. Nifty! Is that a first?
Fraham_
If they got a back end guy who could move to the bullpen if young guys stepped up (Nick martinez/houser) would’ve been better
Daniel Redding
A) LOVE this series!
B) Your guys’ work is STELLAR! Absolutely impressive and goes above and beyond. Proud to be a member/supporter. Keep it up!
Wagner>Cobb
Andrus will be the starting SS this year before Lawlar is. Lawlar doesn’t seem ready to me, and I think Perdomo is more his 2nd half of 2023 than his 1st half.
zack novotny
Not a chance – Luvolllo already said Domo is Starting SS.
Wagner>Cobb
No, I agree that Perdomo is the starter. I just don’t think he’ll hold down the job the entire season. I should’ve clarified that.
PiratesPundit51
While I’d love to see everything blow up in Chavez Ravine this season, I do think 2nd place in this division is Arizona’s for the taking. The two other teams who might be competitive in the division seem to be tripping over each other to see who can be the better underachiever, and the Rockies are still a dumpster fire.
That said, they’re a tough team to figure out. On paper, they look pretty average. Last July, they looked worse than average. They wouldn’t have made the playoffs at all if the Cubs had managed to win more than one game out of the seven they played head-to-head in September. My suspicion is that they are closer to the second half team from last season (32-39) than the first half (52-39).
Wagner>Cobb
A lot hinges on Suarez bouncing back and Gurriel being more consistent. The lineup could be deep, but it could also play really shallow.
The Voices
FYI there’s this guy named Trevor Bauer still available. Best pitcher in the world and willing to play for league minimum. But a fair deal would be $35 million a year with incentives that could push it up to $75 million a year.
Trevor is waiting.
MarkieFresh
BayStars need to pressure him to get on the plane. Missing the Japan vlogs.
BlueSkies_LA
He could be waiting for a bus and it still wouldn’t pick him up.
Old York
Arizona did a pretty decent job of plugging holes and deficiencies in the roster but there was more they could have done.
Going into the offseason, they has issues with the following:
Backup Catcher
3B
OF
DH
SP
RP
For the backup catcher, they got Tucker Barnhart, which is projected to provide 0.2 WAR, which is a lot better than the players they had in 2023 that combined for -0.8 WAR at backup catcher.
Grade:: 4/4
3B: Eugenio Suárez is an upgrade to the recolving door they had last year. 5 guys combined for a -0.2 WAR so his projected 1.7 will be an upgrade for sure.
Grade: 4/4
OF: Resigning Lourdes Gurriel Jr. helped maintain the experience they had in the outfield. The main issue was with CF, where they had a combined 1.1 WAR between 2 players. I think this is one area that they didn’t improve much upon but I guess they’re going to ride Alek for another year.
Grade: 3/4
DH: Not a big fan of signing Joc Pederson, as he’s mostly a splits/bench player. I think they could have done better by signing JD Martinez at DH.
Grade: 1/4
SP: Outside of the top two pitchers, they really didn’t get much production out of the rest of the starters. Between the following starters, they combined for 2.7 WAR.
Zach Davies
Tommy Henry
Ryne Nelson
Brandon Pfaadt
Eduardo Rodriguez is projected to add 3.0 WAR so just adding him is an upgrade to the staff but they need a bit more stability on the backend of the rotation.
Grade: 2/4
RP: They pretty much ran out last year’s pen into 2024. Could have looked at adding one of the high leverage pitchers like the Rays did with Phil Maton. He would have given some more stability to the pen.
0/4
Total: 14/24 = 58% = F
Jean Matrac
I think you were too harsh on your analysis of their pitchers. Davies is gone, which is addition by subtraction alone. Replacing him with ERod is a big upgrade. The other 3 guys are young, and should develop. And of those 3, Pfaadt improved as the season went along and was good in the PS. I think Nelson will be better, since it looked liked he just ran out of gas. He should be better prepared to go 150 IP or so.
With a rotation of:
Gallen
Kelly
Rodriquez
Pfaadt
Nelson/Henry
They’re looking good for 2024. The only thing they could have done better was to sign someone like Ohtani, Yamamoto, Snell, etc. and none of that was happening.
Old York
Okay, so I bump the pitching to 4/4. That turns to a D.
Jean Matrac
You shouldn’t fault them for not signing JDM as well. If we knew what he was willing to sign for there might be a basis for criticism. But since he is still unsigned suggests he asking for far too much. Plus points for not signing him.
And maybe there’s a fault is in your grading system. I think if you graded them on the curve they’d grade much higher.
Old York
@Jean Matrac
I’m just saying they haven’t upgraded their DH. Could be anyone else but I just don’t see Joc Pederson being much of an upgrade to DH, especially since he would need to platoon with someone else for certain games. Now you need two DHs.
Jean Matrac
Good point, I didn’t think they needed two DHs, thinking they could shuffle in RHBs that play a position when there’s a tough lefty on the mound. But I realized that’s easier said than done. They have a lot of LHBs, and not very many RHBs to platoon at DH.
Fraham_
Joc has raked the last 2 years overall and can play the OF too if needed unlike martinez
Old York
@Fraham_
I get that but he can’t hit the other handed pitchers so you’re essentially downgrading the DH position and platooning him with a lesser hitter.
Old York
@Fraham_
Against LHP, he was 20% below league average in 2023. Not sure how that’s raking.
goooooodiamondbacks
I thought “How could someone possibly rate their offseason as an F?!?” Now I see – thanks for posting your thought process!
I feel your possible points should be based on how big of a need it is. Why is backup catcher worth the same as starting 3B?? Similarly, their OF has the NL ROY and a young GG finalist. How is improving that worth weight equal to the vast abyss they had at 3B??
After the Sewald trade at the deadline, the bullpen was an absolute strength for this team. That’s why they didn’t do anything about it during the offseason. You kinda arbitrarily stated there was a need – the team clearly disagrees – and marked them down substantially for it. If anything, maybe it’s worth 0/1 point, but no way 0/4.
Around when they signed Grichuk, there was an article on azsnakepit looking at numbers from recent years. They showed that a platoon of Pederson and Grichuk essentially equals one JD Martinez, plus some backup OF defense from Grichuk, all for a fraction of what they would have had to pay JD. Given their real financial limitations, I honestly don’t see how they could have done better either at DH or for the OF.
If I were to use your system, but rate needs instead of just assigning 4 points to everything:
backup C: 2/2
3B: 4/4
OF: 2/2
DH: 3/3
SP: 4/5
RP: 0/1
Total: 15/17 = 88% = high B, which feels about right to me.
Old York
@goooooodiamondbacks
Needs are needs. If the team doesn’t want to improve upon one area, that’s on them for not doing it. It’s a team sport. Just look at the Mets in 2023. They had a 6 WAR guy and a few 4+ WAR guys and they still were terrible. It doesn’t matter if they had these guys as they didn’t help get them to the playoffs as the rest of the team wasn’t contributing. You need a strong bullpen to get you through the long season and hold leads in the playoffs.
I’m not going to water down my evaluation of the offseason because I think they had more of a need in one area over the other. If they had put all their money into Ohtani, we could say, wow, they got a top player but the rest of the team is terrible. Would you say they had a B season because they got a high WAR guy like Ohtani? It’s about the team so I evaluate on an even plain to ensure the focus in on the team not specific players.
goooooodiamondbacks
“Needs are needs.” Uhh…. no….. That’s not how needs work at all. Not all needs are created equal. Some needs are more urgent, some are more important long-term. Last night I told my wife two things: “I need to take care of our taxes” and “I need to go to the bathroom”. Two very different needs. By admitting that there are needs more needed than other needs, you wouldn’t be “watering down” your evaluation – quite the opposite, actually. You’d be adding an element of complexity to make it more useful.
Of course everyone needs to contribute, but you need more contributions from some than others. You’ll never convince me that backup catcher is as important as starting 3B. Also, they still have their backup catcher from last year, and he’s not great, but not terrible either. Nobody’s trying to make Jose Herrera their starting catcher, but the club is keeping him around. With Longoria gone, AZ didn’t even have a starter. So yeah, not exactly the same type of need.
Also, you’re not really giving any info on why it’s a need, and severely docking them because they didn’t do anything about a position of relative strength. They also didn’t get a first-baseman. I could say “I don’t care about 35 HR, GG defense, and veteran leadership – they didn’t replace Christian Walker, so 0/4 points.” You could do the same for Corbin Carroll, Gerrit Cole… anybody. And any team that was already well built would fail the offseason even if they appropriately mended the frays they had at the edges. Why would completely ignoring a gaping hole be worth the same deduction as merely modest changes to a pretty good group? That’s exactly the type of distinction a worthwhile offseason evaluation should capture.
I hear what you’re saying about it being “about the team so [you] evaluate on an even plain [sic] to ensure the focus is on the team not specific players”. So… how ’bout you actually do that? Instead of picking what you think are needs, go position by position through everyone and assess where they stand out of four points. Evaluate the team. It would be more of a general assessment than one just for the offseason, but it’d be useful and interesting. But by picking and choosing “needs” you’re explicitly NOT using an even playing field.
I’m trying to help you, because you seem to have some cognitive dissonance on this topic – so much so that your analysis directly contradicts your thesis! You said yourself right at the beginning “Arizona did a pretty decent job” but you ended up giving them an F! Your system doesn’t even pass your OWN eye test, let alone the 97% of voters who disagree with you, or the fact that your post garnered a single “like” while my response got 5. As I said, I appreciate you posting your thought process – I think it helps facilitate discussion and I like understanding different perspectives. I’m trying to provide some constructive criticism to improve your method so that your results are more in line with what even YOU seem to think, and for a better basis of discussion.
goooooodiamondbacks
As for your Ohtani example, it would depend on the rest of the team, wouldn’t it?? If the ONLY thing they needed was a DH – if the rest of the team was great and they were super close to winning a championship (…) – then just getting Ohtani would be a great offseason! One need, 4/4 points, solid A. If they had multiple other spots that could’ve used some – even minor – improvement, that A would fall off the cliff very quickly. Even by adding in a 1/2 and 0/1, suddenly it’s 5/7 = 71% = C.
Let me put it another way: you’re already using a weighted evaluation by assigning 0/0 points to anything you don’t deem a “need”, and if you insist on sticking with a flawed method, you’ll keep coming up with results that don’t make sense even to yourself, let alone anyone else reading. Your method would be better if it were more consistent: either don’t weigh anything and just score every roster spot 1-4, or (better for an offseason analysis) account for differences in importance of needs.
highheat
@Old York
You obviously put a decent amount of thought into your rating, but you went through that all with no mention of acquisition costs or roster composition
I’ll say that I also found it odd that all of your high-rated sections included references to relative WAR figures between 2023 and 2024 projections, yet your lowest two ratings (DH and RP) have no numbers at all (and very little context).
Some added context for the DH section: it wasn’t actually just the one hole at DH, it was an additional hole of having very few (if any) competent bats off of the bench. DH last season was used to rotate guys in on their “off days” (and the production that they received was reflective of that).
The projections for Pederson (DH and PH vs. RHP) and Grichuk (DH and PH vs. LHP) compare quite favorably to Martinez (as full-time DH) and whoever they could get as a dedicated bench bat, from both a production and a cost-benefit standpoint. I agree with most of your ratings, but would go 4/4 for DH; since Grichuk additionally has the potential to cover CF against RHP (although, only the early innings; we all know Thomas would come in against the first RHRP and as a defensive replacement)
As far as the RP group goes, they committed to Sewald as CP and functionally have: Castro, Ginkel, and McGough locked in (based on either contract status or tenure). Plus, we saw more than enough promise from Thompson in big spots that he locked down a spot, and they generally carry two LHRPs (from which there is an assortment of: Mantiply, K. Nelson, and Saalfrank, to choose from, all of whom have had varying degrees of success at the MLB level; plus Backhus, who has shown intriguing peripherals in offense-heavy environments).
That’s 7/8 RP spots locked down, and all of the backend innings are accounted for; why commit the money (and roster spot) to a middle RP or MIRP when there is already a plethora of candidates to occupy those spots? I won’t argue against the assertion that they COULD have done more, but in handling it this way, they maintain the roster flexibility to send down struggling arms and don’t commit unnecessary dollars to the most volatile position.
How high your rating for the RP group depends entirely on your opinion of the pre-existing in-house options; I lean towards 3/4, because the late season RP group was SIGNIFICANTLY better than the early season group (and I’m also a good deal higher on some of the unheralded arms).
And regarding the SP group, Jean Matrac encompassed it pretty well; how high your opinion of the group is depends on how you feel about the prospect status of the young SPs (and Brent Strom’s ability to tutor them); I’m 3/4 on the SP, because I still have some doubts about Nelson (still learning how to utilize his offspeed pitches) and Henry (whether he can have pinpoint command, because almost perfectly tunneling is the only way I see him thriving in MLB); Cecconi or Mena having a breakthrough would assuage those concerns, but we are quibbling about a #5 SP…. there are much worse positions to be in.
All of this is to say, I don’t know how you can say that this was an F offseason when the DBacks (on paper) are arguably the most improved team of the offseason.
Blackpink in the area
As others have said I enjoy this series of posts.
I think Arizona gets an A for effort. So many teams this offseason have been cutting costs and rolling payroll back, even playoff teams or near playoff teams. The Diamondbacks have spent and should be a better team in 2024 for it. It’s a tough division the Dodgers are a better team on paper but they look like a strong bet for a wild card and as they showed last year you get in and anything can happen.
SweetBabyRayKingsThickThighs
Solid 82 win team
Homer_Heins
I love Mike Hazen and I am so glad he decided to stay in Arizona and pour himself into our franchise. He is the best GM we have had by far by how he understands assets, using analytics, and developing winning culture. Fans who closely follow are more invested because he’s given so much of himself, and he’s consistent, humble, and hardworking, and applies his brilliance to building a winning tradition. I loved his speech when he accepted his award — brilliant and inspiring.
Jean Matrac
If AZ’s offseason was a D or F, then I think 20 to 24 of the other 30 teams also get a D or F.
Boazona
Good article. One of D-backs’ best off seasons in recent memory. Hard to argue less than a B for making a WS team better.
Only quibble: “Defending Rookie of the Year”is an odd way to put it for Corbin Carroll.
DarkSide830
D. Not big on the signings or the trades really.