With Spring Training a matter of days away for most clubs (and already underway for the Dodgers and Padres), the time of year during which teams begin to focus on extending their players is nearly upon us. A handful of teams have gotten a head start on extension season already as the Tigers signed top infield prospect Colt Keith to a pre-debut extension, the Astros locked up franchise face Jose Altuve for an additional five seasons, and the Royals committed more than $288MM to Bobby Witt Jr.in recent weeks.
As noted by MASN’s Mark Zuckerman, one club that has generally eschewed extensions for its players in recent years is the Nationals. Despite a pipeline of stars that included the likes of Bryce Harper, Trea Turner, Max Scherzer, and Juan Soto over the past decade, the club only managed to extend one player from that era of regular playoff contention: right-hander Stephen Strasburg. With that being said, Zuckerman does point out that the club may be on the verge of changing its reputation for rarely extending players. Catcher Keibert Ruiz signed a $50MM extension with the club last spring that could keep him in D.C. through the 2032 season, and as Washington hopes to take another step towards contention Zuckerman argues the club ought to consider a similar deal for shortstop CJ Abrams.
Abrams, 23, is perhaps best known as the former top Padres prospect who headlined the blockbuster deal that sent Juan Soto from D.C. to San Diego at the 2022 trade deadline. Prior to the 2022 campaign, Abrams was a consensus top 10 prospect in the sport. While the then-21-year-old struggled in his first taste of big league action, slashing just .232/.285/.320 in 46 games in the majors prior to the trade, the youngster’s 80-grade speed, plus hit tool and ability to stick at shortstop were enough (alongside multiple other top prospects) to convince the Nationals to part with a generational hitter entering his prime.
Since donning a Nationals uniform for the first time on August 15 of that year, Abrams has largely held his own but not quite reached the tantalizing potential scouts saw in him during his prospect days. Across 195 games with the club, Abrams has posted a .248/.295/.393 slash line that comes in as a touch below average by measure of wRC+ alongside defense at shortstop that Statcast’s Outs Above Average grades as well below average with a -15 figure, though Fielding Bible’s Defensive Runs Saves paints a slightly rosier picture with a roughly scratch -1 figure.
Difficult as the start to Abrams’s big league career has been, it’s worth noting that he’s steadily improved as his time in the majors has gone on. Over the youngster’s final 88 games last season, Abrams slashed .265/.325/.442 with 33 extra base hits in 381 trips to the plate. That performance at the plate was good for an above-average wRC+ of 105, which when combined with an astonishing 41 stolen bases in 43 attempts over that time span made Abrams a quality offensive contributor out of the leadoff spot for the Nationals. Abrams’s defense at shortstop enjoyed some level of improvement during the 2023 campaign, as well: the 22-year-old posted a +4 DRS last year, a figure that put him in the same conversation as regulars at the position such as Bo Bichette and Javier Baez in terms of glove work.
Given his minimal track record at the big league level, an extension for Abrams comes with plenty of risk. At the same time, Witt’s extension in Kansas City earlier this offseason showcased how pricey even pre-arbitration extensions can become after young talents establish themselves at the big league level. The potential savings in the event that Abrams breaks out and reaches his ceiling is considerable enough to make the prospect of an extension one that’s at least worth considering for Washington. As a young, talented infielder who has shown flashes of success but struggled with consistency over the course of his first service year in the majors, one player in particular stands out as a potential point of reference when considering a hypothetical Abrams extension: Pirates third baseman Ke’Bryan Hayes.
Hayes, much like Abrams, was a consensus top-10 prospect in the sport when he lost prospect eligibility during the 2021 campaign. After slashing an incredible .376/.442/.682 across his first 95 trips to the plate in the big leagues during the shortened 2020 season, Hayes came back down to Earth in 2021 with a .257/.316/.373 slash line while being limited to just 96 games by wrist issues. That mediocre slash line still left Hayes as a career .280/.340/.432 hitter in the big leagues, however, a slash line good for a solid 106 wRC+ that dwarfs Abrams’s career figure of 84. While the speed Abrams has flashed to this point in his career dwarfs that of Hayes at the time, the latter makes up for that with his elite glove at the hot corner. In 2021, Hayes posted a whopping +12 OAA at third base, good for the 98th percentile among all qualified fielders. Abrams, by contrast, was in the 4th percentile last season with an OAA of -9.
All that’s to say that Abrams appears unlikely to surpass or even match the eight-year, $70MM guarantee that Hayes managed to secure from the Pirates just after the 2022 season began, even as Abrams is two years younger than Hayes was at the time of his deal with the club. Another potential point of comparison for Abrams would be the seven-year, $58MM extension shortstop Andrelton Simmons signed with the Braves back in 2014.
Simmons was coming off a 2013 campaign that saw him earn a Gold Glove award and even some down-ballot NL MVP votes for his superlative defense at shortstop, an area where Abrams’s profile is severely lacking. That being said, Simmons’s career 94 wRC+ at the time of the deal is in the same ballpark as Abrams’s figure, and Abrams is both younger and a far bigger threat on the basepaths than Simmons, who stole fewer bases across his first six seasons in the majors than Abrams did in 2023 alone. Perhaps most importantly, however, Simmons’s deal with Atlanta will be a decade old later this month.
Given these factors, it’s fair to assume that any deal between Abrams and the Nationals would would likely guarantee the youngster at least $60MM, giving him the largest guarantee awarded to a shortstop with between one and two years of service time in the majors. Speculatively speaking, an eight-year deal in the $60-65MM range would appear to be reasonable extension for both sides, likely with a club option or two at the end as has become typical of early-career extensions for players who aren’t already established stars. Such a deal could allow the Nationals to extend their window of control over Abrams, who is currently slated to hit free agency following the 2028 season following his age-27 campaign, through his early thirties.
Of course, it’s fair to wonder if Abrams would be interested in a deal of this sort. After all, players who enter free agency in their mid-to-late twenties tend to have significantly more earning potential than those who hit the open market after their thirtieth birthday. While the additional financial security offered by this sort of deal can certainly be appealing to some players, it’s also worth noting that Abrams, as an early first round pick in the 2019 draft, received a healthy $5.2MM signing bonus from the Padres. What’s more, Abrams appears to be in line to become a Super Two player next winter. Super Two players, defined any player with between two and three years of service time who falls in the top 22% of his service bracket, enjoy the benefit of reaching arbitration a year early, meaning that Abrams is likely in line for a significant pay raise next winter with or without an extension, so long as he avoids being demoted to the minor leagues in 2024.
The Voices
“This is America’s real official sports stadium and Americas real official sports team and America’s real official baseball city and fanbase”
The quote refers to Nationals Park/DC in general
davemlaw
I would love to see the Giants trade for Abrams and Corbin and Strasburg (every last dime of both contracts). In return, the Nats get Conforto (and all of his remaining $18M but he does have some trade value) McCray, Arteaga, Ramos and a recent draft pick with upside, like Silva or Bednar.
Nats clear a lot of dead weight and start their contending window a year earlier; the Giants would be instant contenders and relevant.
Unfortunately, it’s not my money and Farhan doesn’t return my calls anymore.
filihok
dml
Let’s sew what BTV has to say
Going to SF
Abrams $46 million
Corbin $-26 million
Strasburg -$105 million
TOTAL -$85 million
Note: Strasburg isn’t listed and his situation is a little strange, so I’m just assuming the Giants pick up,his full remaining AAVs
Going to Washington
Conforto -$9 million
McCray $8 million
Artega $2 million
Ramos $0
TOTAL $1 million
That’s, uh, pretty lopsided.
Where are you disagreeing with the above valuations?
letsgooakland123
haha a week later i finally read this article
this is such a ridiculous trade proposal that i almost think its a troll
Hagatha Crusty
How would acquiring a flawed but talented shortstop and the corpses of two former pitchers possibly turn the giants into contenders?
LernersWallet
Nobody else is getting anything from this wallet.
TheFuzzofKing
Except the lawyers who draft the terms of sale to Monumental.
Deleted Userr
Soto back to the Nats in 2025
Jesse Chavez enthusiast
If the Nats feel he is about to break out offensively it may be the perfect time to offer an extension his way. Right now they may be able to lock him up pretty cheap. Sure, it’s a ton of risk but the upside to be a great shortstop is definitely there.
cwsOverhaul
From the outside, reminds me a bit of when WSox extended TA before he truly put anything together. The hitting for average developed big time to reward the risk, but the glove not really at critical SS position. The supposedly no brainer pick up club options became an escape hatch when things went south.
Armaments216
“Despite a pipeline of stars that included the likes of Bryce Harper, Trea Turner, Max Scherzer…”
Max Scherzer should not be on that pipeline list. Scherzer signed with the Nats in free agency on a 7-year $210M contract. His situation was completely different from Harper, Turner and Soto, who all debuted with the Nationals as rookies and had full team control through arbitration.
TheFuzzofKing
I’m a Nats fan asking honestly because I haven’t done the math, at least not in a while, but if they extended all of Harper, Turner and Soto at market rates (could they even have?) what, realistically, were they going to build around those guys?
Especially given that Strasburg will never pitch again, Corbin stinks, and there was no real alternative in the minor leagues to Josiah Gray and MacKenzie Gore, without whom the team now cannot even finish the season.
Feels like in all of sports writing, the prompt for the Nats is “this franchise sucks. Rich owner, big media market, never any extensions given to homegrown stars. FAs stay away, go to Dodgers instead.”
The Nats’ owners are rich but their assets were and are illiquid, their rotten TV deal was nothing less than opportunistic extortion by one of baseball’s worst owners (and Baltimore’s worst citizens) and their franchise, even if you count the Expos, has really no history to speak of.
The Nats’ situation is nothing like the Yankees, the Dodgers or even the Mets under Steve Cohen.
I think the absolute worst an honest writer or analyst could say about the Nats is “they should have outbid the Phillies for Harper because that deal looks worth it already.”
cwsOverhaul
Don’t sweat it. Most writers lack business acumen and see it as a virtue to pay the next guy’s contract or FA who comes up whatever it takes since it’s not their money (like many fans).
Problem is that’s exactly how execs lose their jobs they dreamed of landing. They have to make unpopular decisions at times to look after short and long-term interests of the club being competitive + limitations/often meddling of owner.
JoeBrady
but if they extended all of Harper, Turner and Soto at market rates (could they even have?) what, realistically, were they going to build around those guys?
===========================
Had they extended all three, they’d have added a surprisingly small 1.2.1 bWAR, and would’ve been on the hook for $113M (including Strasburg).
And we wouldn’t be having this discussion about extensions since Abrams, Gray, Ruiz & Gore, and their 9.8 bWAR, wouldn’t be here.
920kodiak
The Lerners have always been mercurial owners. They will spend on players (Werth, Scherzer, Strasburg, Corbin), but nickel and dime everywhere else (managers, broadcasters, etc). The Nationals are lousy because they traded away most prospects of note prior to the major league team cratering. Those trades, though, led them to a World Series title, which is the whole point). The last rebuild was buttressed by Strasburg/Harper in back to back drafts, that won’t/can’t happen again. Until they get some pitching help, and are able to surround Crews (hopefully) with talent, the Nats will be and probably should be bottom feeders.
JoeBrady
What Zuckerman says about Abrams is the same thing you can say about any young player.
SportsFan0000
CJ Abrams in that Soto deal just has to hurt for Padres ballclub and fans.
A 23 year old shortstop who is cheap, cost controlled and just “breaking out” for the Nats who was “given away” in the Soto deal.
Abrams could have been the Padres starting player @ SS, 2B. LF or CF in ’24.
Add him to rising star SS Jackson Merrill and RF Tatis Jr and the Padres would have have had an OF with great D, speed, and explosive offensive in 2024.
As I predicted before the Soto Trade, The Soto experiment with the Padres failed to win the Padres a Championship handed over too much young talent that the Padres need for depth to compete in ’24 and beyond.
On the positive side, AJ Preller is great and identifying and signing young talent. He should stick to that and hand over
trades and roster construction to others.