The qualifying offer is one of the key mechanisms of free agent season, as teams have until five days after the end of the World Series to decide whether or not to issue the one-year contract (this winter reportedly worth around $20.5MM) to eligible free agents. If a player has played with his team throughout the entire 2023 season and hasn’t received a QO in the past, he is eligible to be issued a qualifying offer, and thus the player can opt to accept the QO and forego free agency altogether.
If the player rejects the QO, his former team is now in line to receive some draft-pick compensation if the free agent signs elsewhere. Here is the (mostly set) rundown of what every team will receive should one of their qualified free agents indeed head to another club…
Revenue Sharing Recipients: Diamondbacks, Rockies, Reds, Brewers, Pirates, Marlins, Athletics, Mariners, Tigers, Royals, Twins, Guardians, Orioles, Rays
If any of these teams has a QO-rejecting free agent who signs elsewhere for more than $50MM in guaranteed money, the compensatory pick falls after the first round of the draft. If a team has a QO-rejecting free agent who signs elsewhere for less than $50MM guaranteed, the compensatory pick would come between Competitive Balance Round B and the start of the third round. In the 2023 draft, these compensation picks were the 68th, 69th, and 70th overall selections.
Of the pending free agents on these teams’ rosters, the Twins’ Sonny Gray is the most clear-cut candidate to receive a qualifying offer. Jorge Soler is expected to opt out of the final year of his contract with the Marlins, and Miami is likely to issue him a qualifying offer if Soler does indeed hit the open market again. The Mariners’ Teoscar Hernandez is also a good QO candidate, even though the outfielder is coming off a relative down year and might conceivably choose to just take the $20.5MM payday in the hopes of a producing a better platform season in advance of the 2024-25 free agent class. On the other hand, since this offseason’s market is thin on position players, Hernandez and his representatives might feel this is the better time to reject a QO and pursue a lucrative multi-year deal.
Teams Who Don’t Receive Revenue-Sharing Funds, And Who Didn’t Pay The Competitive Balance Tax: Giants, Cardinals, Cubs, Nationals, Astros, White Sox, Red Sox
For these teams, the compensatory pick for losing a qualified free agent would also fall between CBR-B and the start of the third round (regardless of whether the player signed for more or less than $50MM). Cody Bellinger is a lock to receive and reject the Cubs’ qualifying offer, as the outfielder/first baseman will be looking to cash in after his big bounce-back season in 2023. Aside from Bellinger, none of the other pending free agents for these teams look like plausible QO candidates.
The Team In Limbo: Angels
It should be noted that these lists of teams and their CBT status won’t be officially finalized until December. Usually, it isn’t difficult to figure out which teams surpass the $233MM tax threshold, and sites like Roster Resource and Cot’s Baseball Contracts do excellent work in calculating luxury tax estimates over the course of a season. However, this winter w have a relatively rare case of a team whose status won’t be known until December, as the Angels are by all accounts right on the borderline of the $233MM figure.
The Angels’ waiver wire purge in late August moved some salary off the books, but according to some reports at the start of September, the Halos remained slightly over the $233MM mark. Cot’s has the Angels just over the line at an estimated $236MM CBT number, while Roster Resource’s projection has the Angels avoiding a tax penalty with a $228.7MM CBT number.
Given how the Angels have the offseason’s most prominent free agent in Shohei Ohtani, it is no small matter for the club to know exactly what draft compensation they might receive should Ohtani (after obviously rejecting the QO) depart for another team. While Ohtani re-signing in Anaheim is the best-case scenario, the next best option would be a compensatory pick in the 68-70 range for the Angels in next year’s draft…
Competitive Balance Tax Payors: Dodgers, Padres, Mets, Phillies, Braves, Rangers, Blue Jays, Yankees
…and the least palatable option would be the lesser compensation should the Angels indeed end up over the CBT line. If a team exceeds the luxury tax, they still receive a pick if a qualified free agent signed elsewhere, but that compensatory pick falls after the fourth round of the 2024 draft. In the 2023 draft, these picks fell between 132nd and 137th overall.
Regardless of the Angels’ status, 2023 still set a new record for highest number of teams in excess of the luxury tax threshold — the previous mark was six teams, in both 2022 and 2016. Of the 8-9 clubs surpassing the CBT this season, three (the Mets, Yankees, and Padres) also surpassed the $273MM threshold, which means that they’ll face the further penalty of having their first-round pick dropped back by ten slots in the 2024 draft.
Several prominent free agents from the CBT payors are either locks or strong candidates to receive qualifying offers, including the Padres’ Blake Snell and Josh Hader, the Phillies’ Aaron Nola, and the Blue Jays’ Matt Chapman. The Dodgers’ J.D. Martinez is a QO candidate on paper, but with Los Angeles heavily rumored to be making a run at Ohtani, the Dodgers might pass on issuing a QO to Martinez out of a concern that he might accept, thus tying up the team’s designated hitter spot.
nukeg
This was an interesting season. Clearly the formula for winning (once again) was build up your system, establish a core, and fortify with solid FA contracts.
It’s amazing how many teams forget about the “build up your system” part and have no core to establish.
zimerust
Phillies core is entirely made up of free agents for the most part. It can work both ways.
Codeeg
Well priced free agents really help too. Wheeler really was an amazing price for what they got.
TroyVan
That’s a DD trademark. And, bad bullpen. But, hey. Right now, he’s killing it with his team. Again.
But, watch how his bullpen performs in the remaining games. Doesn’t matter how many free agents you sign and what your team looks like on paper. If your bullpen can’t hold a lead, it’s all just a huge waste of resources.
Jesse Chavez enthusiast
The difference is Dumbrowski is no dummy. He’s had success before with other organizations and is very good at bringing in moderately priced free agents to complete a roster that was close to competing. A lot of people made fun of me in the off-season for criticizing AJ Preller for his stupid contracts of desperation and locking players up until they 41 or 42. (Some even said he was a genius because of the slightly lower AAVs on the deals.) You can maybe afford to sign a couple of guys very long term, but you cant afford to be stupid like Preller. By far the worst GM in baseball and ruined two generations (2015 and present) of Padres baseball. I really do feel sorry for the padres fans who weren’t smug this past off-season.
iverbure
Definitely the most important part if you plan on sustainable winning, can’t hot shot your way into winning like the padres and Mets tried.
Poolhalljunkies
One could argue texas had success mainly due to free agent acquisitions..
Ma4170
To a degree, but they did have adolis garcia, nate lowe, heim, and montgomery (trades) and prospects like jung, carter, and taveras
Seager semien eovaldi the big FA for sure, but its a pretty good blend
Melchez17
They traded top prospects like Acuna and Roby and Segese. They still have Wyatt Langford, Brock Porter and a guy named Kumar Rocker waiting in the wings.
I really like what the Rangers have built.
That free agent class of shortstops… Seager was my favorite and was hoping my team would get him. Everyone said he would have to move off of short and he was injury prone… the guy was decent at short and will be there for a few more years. He could easily move over to 3B or 2B if needed, but now he’s fine.
Old York
Must be nice to have 90-100+ win season and still get revenue sharing. What a joke.
EasternLeagueVeteran
Winning is not all about money. Six of the teams who are revenue sharing recipients made the playoffs and one, the Diamondbacks, are still alive in the NLCS. The Astros didn’t exceed the tax threshold and won’t pay a CBT tax.
Yes, the Phillies and the Rangers are still there too.
Good scouting and development are as important to running a good franchise. Time for the Yankees to clear house. Paid too much for a lot of broken pieces ( Stanton, Donaldson, Rodon) and which set the franchise back. Maybe the Mets got the message early, as unfortunate as it may be for their fans next year.
At least the Braves have their core licked up for a few years. Some Cost-certainty after good scouting evaluations.
Melchez17
Does it really matter? the team won’t see the results until 5 or more years down the line and most likely the player will be a bench player at most.
BrianStrowman9
Yea, Melchy. The added bonus money assigned with draft pick and the pick itself are essentially worthless garbage that no team should ever want!
Melchez17
Where did I say worthless garbage? I said you might get a decent bench player? Maybe?
I guess I could go your route and say, “Every supplemental 1st round pick is a Hall of Famer”.
In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani
You can always go overslot with the first round pick. See Wyatt Langford.
iverbure
Here we have a guy who doesn’t understand the draft whatsoever and how teams evaluate that bonus money. They nearly had a lockout over this because teams value that bonus money more than free agents lol
Butter Biscuits
If the padres Mets or Yankees win the mlb draft lottery, do they still move down 10 spots?
mlbtrrtblm
No, If either ends up with one of the first six picks, that pick is protected, so their second round pick would drop ten spots rather than their first.
DarkSide830
Just to clarify, if a CBT team loses a QO player but signs a different one, do they lose a 2nd and gain a 4th or do they cancel out?
In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani
I think the first scenario is more accurate. I do recall seeing stuff last offseason about teams losing more than they gained for swapping. That’s why the Mets didn’t go after QO guys last year. Also, I think the old system did directly swap picks, while the new one only awards ones at the end of the round, while skipping the team that signed the player (2/15 gets replaced with 2/16 and the losing team gets 2/31).
Mad Hatter
14 teams fall in the Revenue Sharing Recipients category? That’s crazy.
This one belongs to the Reds
Why? It just goes to show the revenue inequity in the game. I bet most of them have local TV deals with Bally’s worth little.
ohyeadam
It’s a sign of how top heavy the league is. The big market teams make a lot more money
aragon
Minasian should have waived Rengifo before he got injured. The angels might have been under the tax threshold if he did.
gbs42
Yeah, why didn’t he see into the future???
nrd1138
Starting to think that MLB needs to take a lesson from the European soccer/football leagues and perennially bad teams get knocked down to a lesser league until they get better. That should stop the gaming that you see some teams doing to either save money or get good overall picks (or both)
Smacky
It’s an ownership problem. If you can’t afford to compete sell it to some one or some entity that can.
inkstainedscribe
That would never work because of the minor leagues. If you relegated the A’s to AAA, who would replace them? The Durham Bulls (Tampa’s AAA affiliate)?
MLB appears happy to reward owners who make money while losing games. Until those incentives change (and face it, MLB IS the owners), the current system will stay in place.
ayrbhoy
Nrd1138- I’ve been saying that for years! I am biased though. I emigrated from Scotland.
Re: inkstain’s response…the answer is simple – the 3 worst MLB teams would still play ball in their current MLB parks. Their competition would be AAA teams instead of MLB teams.
There would have to be modifications and changes to the current system of course, but the point is…The relegation system would 100% solve the problems of MLB teams tanking. Plus! You think a pennant chase is fun? With the Relegation system the competition between the bottom 5-6 teams is fierce down the stretch because NO-ONE (fans, players inc) wants to get sent down. In a sense you get 2 races each season- almost like what the WC has done to playoffs: keeps it more interesting
The irony re: your Durham Bulls comment is that the Bulls would beat the A’s right now.