There are myriad reasons for the Dodgers’ decade-long run of excellence. They’ve added elite players via trade (Mookie Betts) and free agency (Freddie Freeman). Their strong player development pipeline has allowed them to consistently supplement their high-payroll, star-laden roster with controllable talent.
As with any good team, the Dodgers have also hit on less visible acquisitions. Jason Heyward has looked reinvigorated after cracking the L.A. roster following an offseason minor league pact. Ryan Brasier and Shelby Miller have turned in solid results in the middle innings since being acquired at little cost. None of those have been as impactful as the August 2021 waiver claim of right-hander Evan Phillips.
Phillips had pitched in parts of four MLB seasons at the time. He’d debuted with the Braves and been included in the 2018 deadline deal that sent Kevin Gausman from the Orioles to Atlanta. Phillips flashed strikeout upside with the O’s over the next couple seasons but couldn’t consistently throw strikes. At the end of the 2020 campaign, a rebuilding Baltimore team put Phillips on waivers. He went unclaimed.
The reliever stayed in the O’s system until the following August. He was carrying an ERA a little above 5.00 in Triple-A when Baltimore released him. The Rays signed Phillips to a minor league deal, called him up for one three-inning outing, then pushed him back off the MLB roster. When he hit waivers for a second time, L.A. claimed him.
It seemed a nondescript move. Phillips had a 7.26 ERA in 49 career appearances. Relievers with swing-and-miss potential but control woes often change hands. Phillips was out of options, meaning he couldn’t be sent to the minors without running through waivers. It seemed entirely possible he’d get quickly squeezed out of the Dodger bullpen the way he had been in Tampa Bay.
Phillips threw 10 1/3 unremarkable innings down the stretch. He was left off the playoff roster for the first two rounds before working three scoreless frames in an eventual NLCS loss to the Braves. He held his spot on the 40-man all winter and began last year in middle relief.
It only took a couple months for him to establish himself in a higher-leverage role. Phillips broke out with 63 innings of 1.14 ERA ball, the lowest mark of any reliever with 60+ frames. He struck out nearly a third of opposing hitters while cutting his walks to a lower than average 6.4% rate. While he didn’t dramatically increase the number of pitches he threw within the strike zone, he more consistently got hitters to chase pitches off the plate. Hitters’ rate of swings on would-be balls went up, while they began taking more pitches within the zone. He was giving opponents a much more uncomfortable at-bat.
Upon landing with the Dodgers, Phillips made a couple adjustments to his pitch mix. Against right-handed batters, he increasingly leaned on his slider — his best offering — while scaling back on his four-seam fastball. When facing southpaws, he dropped a split in favor of a low-90s cutter. He has dominated hitters of either handedness since that point.
Phillips was never likely to repeat a 1.14 ERA — that’s an almost impossible ask of any pitcher — but he has again been one of the game’s best relievers. He’s allowing only 2.18 earned runs per nine over 53 2/3 frames. His strikeout rate is down slightly but still well above-average at 29.9%. The Dodgers have increasingly used him in the ninth inning, and he’s responded with 22 saves (and six holds) while blowing a lead just twice.
Going back to the start of last season, Phillips leads MLB relievers (minimum 100 innings) with a 1.62 ERA. He’s 11th among that group in strikeout percentage and eighth in both strikeout/walk rate differential and SIERA. He’ll turn 29 on Monday but still has three more seasons of club control via arbitration. Phillips played last year on a near-minimum salary and is making $1.3MM this season as a Super Two qualifier.
The Dodgers will go into the postseason with perhaps their spottiest starting staff in years. Julio Urías is on administrative leave after a felony domestic violence arrest. Clayton Kershaw is pitching through shoulder discomfort. Lance Lynn continues to struggle with home runs. Dustin May and Tony Gonsolin have undergone season-ending surgery. There’s a case that rookie Bobby Miller — who has all of 17 major league starts to his name — is L.A.’s most reliable starter at the moment.
That’ll very likely increase the pressure on the relief corps in October. The Dodgers have an above-average bullpen, with Brusdar Graterol and Caleb Ferguson joining Brasier, Miller and hopefully deadline acquisition Joe Kelly in bridging the middle innings. Dave Roberts figures to lean most heavily on Phillips, something no one would’ve projected when the Dodgers placed their claim a little over two years ago.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Edp007
Coz closers are the most overrated position in mlb. All failed starters. And many are last years or previous years waiver claims. Lol they come and go. The closers who have long careers are just simply the best from a group of failed starters.
Maxxx
Too right. Tbh what’s the point of having relievers because they’re all failed starters so they r all bad and extremely lucky to have a job, why not just let the starter, who didn’t fail to become a starter, pitch the whole time and not have these failures pitch again.
njbirdsfan
I agree. It’s a sad reflection on the Hall of Fame that the first person they elected unanimously was a closer. Think about all the guys who came before that who were obvious slam dunks but nope, the closer is who we go with. Not to mention the recent run of them going in compared to every other position.
My personal favorite is when closers blow the save aka fail at their one job, game tied, and home team walks it off in the bottom of the 9th. Guess who gets the win? The ineffective closer.
filihok
Njbf
That’s more a problem with awadaring a win to a single player than it is with pitchers pitch the ninth inning.
Deadguy
Njbf you’ve mutted me because this take? Lol Mariano Rivera was worthy of the hall of fame because of his post season numbers alone… Couple his post season numbers with regular season and Rivera becomes one of a kind?
But you know… lets see another example? Kinda how Curt schilling isn’t worthy because he’s a troll (aka rally runner supporter) and only was good for 2004 and 3,000 strikeouts?
miltpappas
Closers play 1/18th of a game every three days or so. Not one should be in the HOF (as great as Mariano and Trevor were) and electing guys like Smith, Sutter and Gossage is a complete joke.
DMiles5149
You can argue other closers all you want but the Mariano Rivera take is horrendous. One of, if not the best postseason pitcher of all time. And I think he has the 11th most innings pitched in the postseason.
rct
“It’s a sad reflection on the Hall of Fame that the first person they elected unanimously was a closer.”
It was Mariano Rivera. 1200 innings of 205 ERA+ and 56 WAR. Another 141 innings of 0.70 ERA in the postseason. Don’t act like Rivera didn’t deserve a unanimous selection. The most consistently dominant reliever of all time without question.
filihok
Rct
I don’t think anyone is questioning that Rivera was, at worst, one of the top relievers of all time
They are questioning if that’s sufficient for the HoF
DMiles5149
Yes, it is.
rememberthecoop
I think his point is – and I agree – that, as great as he was, he shouldn’t be the first (and only) unanimous hall of famer. You telling me that Babe Ruth, with all his world series wins as both a pitcher and hitter didn’t deserve to be unanimous? Ruth is still the only pitcher ever to win 3 starts in a single world series if I’m not mistaken.
filihok
RtC
People make way too much about vote percentages
It doesn’t mean that Rivera is 100% a HoFer and Gil Hodges is 75% a HoFer
They are both HoFers. That’s it.
rct
“They are questioning if that’s sufficient for the HoF”
And I’m telling you that it is. Please refer back to the stats I just provided. I’m not even a Yankees fan. But if you think Mariano Rivera isn’t a Hall of Famer, you don’t know baseball.
rct
@filihok: I agree. I don’t care about the percentages but do think it is wild that some voters don’t vote for guys like Ken Griffey Jr.
filihok
Rcl
What a borish comment
Adios
briar-patch thatcher
Rivera is never a unanimous HOF. Ever.
It should have been Mays first, then Griffey
briar-patch thatcher
Let’s see, since Friedman arrived, the Dodgers only won a 2020 shortened-season pandemic ring and the Rays pulled Blake Snell too early in the biggest game of their franchise’s history. Maybe the two franchises brokered a gentleman’s agreement that year since they both lucked their way in.
filihok
RE b-p t
Truly the dumbest take
Every team was playing under the same rules and in the same situation
Every team lucks their way into the WS to some degree
filihok
B-P T
All that means is everyone voted for them, or everyone didn’t
It doesn’t mean Rivers was better
It doesn’t mean that he’s more of a HoFer
It just means everyone though he was.
DMiles5149
Yes, he is a unanimous HOF’er. Sorry your feelings don’t accept that but that’s exactly how it went down.
filihok
DM
Except wasn’t their one voter tho didn’t vote because he didn’t want to be the one who didn’t vote and kept Rivera from being elected unanimously?
The whole thing is a bit of s face
DMiles5149
Yeah I’ve never been a fan of the “he’s a hall of famer, but not first ballot” mindset. Never made sense to me how the voters could not vote one year, then the next on a guy.
filihok
DM
Yup
Totally senseless
Do people forget, or not understand, it’s a bunch of individuals voting
Are they supposed to collaborate? Well, we need at least 5% to vote yes to keep him on the ballot, not not 76% to vote him in. So, let’s go down the list.
Aaron, you vote yes
Adam, you got no
Agnes, you’re in for yes
…
Ok whew Zayne, you’re voting now
Now, onto the next player….
Just total senselessness
Sadface
It is crazy that some voters didn’t vote for Griffey or Jeter or Aaron or Mays or Ruth.
bag o ballz
I don’t know what people’s hangup is about letting guys from this position or that deserve to be in the hof, I think the best at every position should be there, you don’t decide not to field a catcher in the ASG because they aren’t as good as the top outfielder… they all contribute to baseball history
filihok
BoB
That’s a fair way to look at it
Another fair way to look at it is that certain positions don’t produce as much value as others. Relievers would be one. Pinch runners would be another. As would pinch hitters and designated hitters.
There’s no one right way to look at it.
User 401527550
There should be at least 100 players in the hall of fame with first ballot unanimous ballots. The joke is baseball continuously letting sports writers with agendas voting after not voting for people like Ted Williams, Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Bob Gibson and on and on.
A'sfaninLondonUK
@remember the coop… and re the Babe:
Mickey Lolich won three in the 1968 World Series… personally I think Lolich is HofF worthy…
Tigers3232
@Njbf while I absolutely believe MO is deserving after a being a first ballot HOFer, I do find it ironic him being the first unanimously elected. Not that I think there is a logical argument to bot have voted for him, but I’d say the vast majority of first ballot guys should have been unanimous as well.
unpaidobserver
In fairness it difficult to rewrite a game article bc the closer blew the lead…
Spaced-Cowboy
Marcus Stroman enters the chat, clutches his side, and walks gingerly off into a cornfield.
amk1920
Yet every time the Dodgers claim a RP off waivers people will be like “dumpster diving”. It only takes one to be worth ten
BlueSkies_LA
On this I’d say “maybe.” Whether it’s true or not depends on how long you stick with the other nine.
amk1920
It’s usually not long. Like the Tyson guy who only pitched a couple games when they needed arms. What the Dodgers did with Phillips and Braiser has been incredible. Much better than paying high money to rps
BlueSkies_LA
They’ve hung onto quite a few well beyond their sell-by dates. Bickford, for a recent example. And then you’ve got the ones who collect salaries sometimes for years without hardly if ever throwing a pitch. Nelson, for example. This ledger book has two columns.
filihok
BS_LA
Nelson is s completely different situation
BickFord was positive fWAR. No real reason to ditch him
BlueSkies_LA
Except that he stunk. Now he’s stinking up the joint in NY.
Nelson isn’t a completely different situation at all, in fact he’s a perfect example. They’ve invested millions in that guy over several years and gotten next to nothing out of it. It’s is like driving all over town looking for a free lunch and not counting how much you spent on gas.
filihok
BS_LA
He didn’t stink. He was a bit above replacement
This thread and this part of the thread is about players picked up on waivers. That’s not Nelson
amk1920
Bickford was a fantastic claim in 2021 and showed a lot. They weren’t going to cut bait the second he stopped being good.
vtadave
Wow, a whopping $1.95 million investment in Jimmy Nelson. How will the Dodgers recover from that loss?
BasedBall
Blue sky being negative again. Finding 1 Evan Phillips is worth signing 10 Jimmy Nelson types
filihok
Mirb
Let’s see
I’m ignoring Phillips’ partial 2021 season for ease of calculations
In 2022 Phillips was worth 2.2 fWAR
In 2023 Phillips has been worth 1.3 fWAR. Give him .2 fWAR the rest of the season and that’s 1.5 for the year
The Dodgers paid him league minimum in 2022 and $1.3 million in 2023. So, in actuality they’ve paid him about .6 million – I’m ignoring the .7 million that is the league minimum each year because they would have had to pay someone that no matter what.
FanGraphs says the value of Phillips’ production in 2022 was $17.5 million and for 2023, so far, it has been $10.6 million. Given $10.6 million for 1.3 fWAR we can extrapolate that 1.5 fWAR would be worth $12.2 million.
Thus, Phillips has provided $29.7 million at a cost of .6 million over the two seasons. So, ($29.7-$.6) 29.1 million in total surplus value or ($29.1/2) $14.5 million of surplus value per season.
How many Nelsons is that?
Nelson produced 1 fWAR in 2021 (It should be noted that Nelson was FANTASTIC when he pitched in 2021). That was worth $7.7 million.
Nelson’s contract situation is a bit complicated, but, I think it shakes out like this
He was paid $1.25 million in 2020. That contract had vesting option, which did not vest.
And another $1.25 million in 2021 =. I’ll subtract out 2/3’s of the minimum for that year for the time Nelson spent on the active roster. ($1.25 – ((2/3)*(.7)). That leaves about $.8 million.
Then $700 thousand in 2022 plus a $.5 million option that was declined. So, $1.2 million.
And $1.2 million in 2023.
In all, they have paid Nelson $4.5 million for $7.7 million of value. So, they are up $3.2 million with Nelson.
So, $3.2 million over 4 years means the team is, on average, getting ($3.2/4) $.8 million per year of surplus value from the deals with Nelson
Let’s compare Nelson’s $.8 million per year to Phillips’ $14.5 million per year. ($14.5/$.8 = 18.1).
It appears, if I didn’t make a mistake somewhere, that one Evan Phillips has been worth just about 18 Jimmy Nelsons.
BlueSkies_LA
Total crapola. Bickford wasn’t DFA’d because he was good. He actually had only one good season, two years ago. Otherwise, he stunk.
The point on Nelson was a response to the idea that it’s better to take a bunch of long shot bets instead of paying pitchers with a track record, as if those bets are freebees.
filihok
BS_LA
“Bickford wasn’t DFA’d because he was good”
Agreed. He was good, thus he was not DFA’d
🙂
In his time with the Dodgers Bickford:
K’d 20% more hitters than the average pitcher
BB’d 6% more hitters than the average pitcher
Game up 1% more earned runs than the average pitcher
Had a FIP 4% better than the average pitcher
Had an xFIP 7% better than the average pitcher
fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&st…
Is this the guy you want coming into the 7th game of the World Series to protect a one run lead? As one of the last guys out of the arm barn, he was a heck of a lot better than most.
BlueSkies_LA
Now you’re telling me he wasn’t and still you know better than me?
Shheezzus.
filihok
BS
I think you’ve confused yourself
BlueSkies_LA
Uh, what? You said he wasn’t DFA’d. He was. The date this happened, in the unlikely event you’re interested in facts, was July 29.
So not the confused one here at all. Except maybe by what you’re still arguing about. That is sort of confusing.
Cam
@filihok – I see what you’re saying here, but BlueSkies can’t interpret it. There’s no use responding – you’re going back and forth with someone who looks for conflict. He/she ends up in this situation constantly, but thinks it’s other people who are the issue. He/she can’t see the common denominator.
It’s time to mute them.
filihok
Cam,
Yeah. I usually mute rather quickly, but I was having a bit of toying with them.
I think that fun is over
filihok
BS
Sigh…
You’ve said he was bad for nearly 2 years (he wasn’t). Why wasn’t he DFA’d a long time ago?
He was DFA’d now because he was the last reliever out of the pen (those are the players he should be compared to, not the high leverage players) and the Dodgers needed a spot on the 40 player roster and he was out of options. Not because “he sux!!!1111One”.
That’s the kindergarten level of thinking about players.
Not how intelligent and informed people think about players.
Anyway, it’s been fun
But now it’s boring. I don’t see that reading any of your future comments here is going to bring me any enlightenment.
So, adios. Off to mute land.
alwaysgo4two
It’s pretty much what the Rays do every year. Actually I’m surprised that they missed on him. Maybe because they were lower on the list.
paddyo furnichuh
Per 4th paragraph, the Rays were the one trying to send Phillips down when the Dodgers claimed him.
alwaysgo4two
Ahhh….missed that. Obviously they also miss occasionally.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
The Mariners are very adept at this as well and also had Phillips in their system for a wee bit.
Samuel
Dodgers PoBO head Andrew Friedman came over from the Rays.
Both teams have track records of having pitching depth at the beginning of each year – not only in the majors but guys they call up during the season from their minor league affiliates. And they have track records of bringing in pitchers from other organizations that weren’t producing but miraculously succeed once they’re reworked.
Unfortunately, both teams also have track records of a high percentage of their pitchers being injured each year (which the Dodgers are yet again experiencing this year as noted in the article above).
How long does Mr. Phillips keep this up for? Throwing breaking pitches at high speeds while increasing moment of the ball by increasing the spin rate puts undue stress on any number of muscles and ligaments that is driving these pitchers to the injured list, and subsequently shortening their careers.
Two teams I follow closely – the Astros and Orioles – also have track records for bringing in pitchers that have failed with other organizations and the reworking them to be productive. But while I see a few guys that suffer pitching injuries from those 2 teams, I don’t see anywhere near the percentage that the Dodgers and Rays have. Why is that? Where do we go to find an article explaining that?
fred-3
The Dodgers and Rays go the high risk, high reward route in the draft due to picking late every year in the draft. They take chances on pitchers with injury history. I’m not sure Astros have the same philosophy and the Orioles didn’t really have to take risk on players due to their draft position.
BrianStrowman9
I don’t think that MLBTR has anyone who could write an analysis on that….
DMiles5149
They’re the Rays with money.
BlueSkies_LA
It should be said that officially the Dodgers still don’t have a designated closer, and nearly as many saves have been recorded by other members of the Dodgers bullpen this season as by Phillips. Next on the list is Graterol, with seven. So while Phillips has pitched himself into the go-to closer role in most situations, on any given day just about any member of the bullpen could be called on for a save.
filihok
This should also be said
Pitcher.- average leverage index when entering the game (minimum 10 innings)
Ferguson – 1.48
Phillips – 1.40
Graterol – 1.25
Grove – 1.18
Robertson 1.14
These are the only five Dodger pitchers with a higher than 1 average leverage index when entering
Note that Ferguson moves up to 1.52 when his opens are removed
*https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=all&qual=20&type=3&month=0&ind=0&team=22&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=&enddate=&season1=2023&season=2023&sortcol=9&sortdir=desc&stats=rel
If we look just since August 1st (it gets a little wonky due to sample size – minimum 1 inning)
Ferguson – 1.84
Kelly – 1.35
Miller – 1.27
Graterol- 1.26
Sheehan- 1.22
Phillips – 1.21
It’s clear that they are going to Ferguson in the biggest spots.
njbirdsfan
And then there’s always some fan site going off either on the teams who didn’t get lucky or the team that did.
Guys like this are passed along multiple times for a reason. If they had pitched like this from day one, they’d never hit the open market. And sometimes it only takes a tweak, or a new pitch or a change of scenery for it to happen.
Slider_withcheese
Let’s not make a bigger deal out of it than it is. Sometimes you just get lucky.
southi
I remember when the Braves had him and dealt him away. It didn’t seem as if they ever gave him much of an opportunity at the big league level.
Neon Cop
I don’t think they miss him at all.
CptJack
How much is Phillips’ agent paying a transactions site to write nice things about him?
BlueSkies_LA
🙁
But I Do
For real. Or it’s just MLBTR trying (and failing) to be like Fangraphs. This article is super trite.
Vince Ferragamo's Dog
They bring Phillips in as needed like how Hader was used w/Brewers, if it’s high pressure situation w/runners on but only 7th they bring em on to put out that fire, its not genius how Rays n Dodgers “reinvent” discarded Ps over n over, its case by case w/every P having different strengths n weaknesses, usually its poor pitch sequence, relying on pitches that aren’t working, not using Ur plus pitch enough, & really dialing in on better location, gonna need sum new horses in the starting rotation next season
LFGMets (Metsin7) #InEpplerIsGone!!!!
While Phillip’s stats look nice, I don’t really see anything in him that makes me see him as “dominant”. Honestly I don’t think hes that good from what I’ve seen. Obviously the stats say hes good but I wouldn’t have any confidence in having him as my closer come postseason time
empirejim
You had plenty of confidence in the Mets on opening day, I’d wager. Confidence is better placed on results than “hoped for” outcomes, and Philips has the results to engender confidence.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
I am not LFGMets burner account but I can vouch he DID NOT have much hope for his Mets team at the beginning of season & pretty much predicted what would happen (granted that wasn’t a far reach.)
LFGMets (Metsin7) #InEpplerIsGone!!!!
@Ignorant Son-of-b you are 100% right
LFGMets (Metsin7) #InEpplerIsGone!!!!
@empirejim I did not have any confidence in the Mets on opening day. I’ve been saying all year how the team isn’t good. 400 million dollar payroll team with the worst GM ever
ChangedName
It’s a great pick up for sure and the Dodgers should be commended but if it’s that easy to find great relievers then why have the Dodgers also been one of the biggest spenders on bullpen arms for a really long time?
empirejim
Who said anything about easy?
fred-3
The Dodgers haven’t spent big on a reliever since giving Kenley an extension, which was almost a decade ago.
ChangedName
They’re top 10 in percentage of payroll allocated to the bullpen and have been for nearly a decade. Everyone is just hurt this year.
fred-3
What Dodgers’ relievers even make any real money? Daniel Hudson is probably your answer, but he’s making less than $10m
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
Sort of a misleading headline. What they grabbed off waivers back in 2021 was a top of the junk pile requisition with not much succes in the MLB. These kind of guys can turn back to pumpkins really quick so I am not sure he is worth the “elite” closer status. For similar reasons I was fine with Seattle trading Sewald at the deadline. Former waiver wire pickup who the M’s tweaked into a solid closer…who only throws 92-93. Reversion to Pumpkin status can occur at any time. The Fickle Finger Of Fate.
Rsox
“Elite Closer” means Roberts will be bringing him in in the 5th inning of playoff games like he used to do with Jansen
CCooper8920
So happy things are finally working out for the dodgers been a really rough run for them
CrikesAlready
The Dodgers seem to get the most out of people. The Cardinals did too, for a while.
The Padres did that with pitchers back in the Kevin Towers era, but seem to turn diamonds into poo of late with AJ Preller.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
I dunno , aren’t the Padres “#2 or #3 in staff ERA and they have Snell who is pitching like a beast.
filihok
ISB
4th in ERA
11th in FIP and xFIP
6th in ERA-
11th in FIP-and xFIP-
ERA is the worst of those measures in measuring pitching performance
citizen
braves got Gausmann in that deal. but gausman was mostly injured as a brave. Maybe he should have pulled at strausburg and “retired”
Johnny Schaefer
Ryan Pepiot just flirted with a no-hitter!
itsmeheyhii
I love stories like this. Doesnt get much better than perseverance leading to a career turnaround.
Blue Baron
TurnOffTheTV is an
Ignorant
Troll
DarkSide830
Im hardly anti-Sox, but Brasier having a career revival is pretty funny.
baseballteam
He will implode in the playoffs.
filihok
RE: BBT
Imagine being the kind of person who
1) thinks they can predict the future
2) is so sure of themselves that they post this here
AM21
This reads more like propaganda than news.
Angry Disgruntled Sox Fan
Funny how we trade Brasier and he looks amazing for the Dodgers. He was so bad on the Red Sox in the last couple years… I would not trust him in the postseason in high leverage situations one bit.
filihok
Re: D&B
User name checks out
Fred McGriff HR
TurnofftheTV
Don’t pay any attention to ‘Filihok’ he asserted he “muted me”, something I am so concerned about, it caused me great concern and loss of sleep with the threat of the ‘mute’. I should be so fearful of his ‘mute’ for calling him out, and proving with statistics that sides that have the bye in the post season have a disadvantage by not playing for 4 days after the regular season. Don’t dare disagree with him, he’ll threaten you with ‘mute’.
The guy is the MVP of ignorance, and is full of his own arrogance.
And there you are, he’s reported you & “muted” you on a baseball forum for nothing. Be fearful of the almighty Filihok and his ‘mute’..
Fred McGriff HR
Here’s this Filihok guy making comments all over the thread asserting sides “luck their way into a World Series”. What utter horse manure..
Ted
Wait wait wait. Shelby Miller is good again?