Not a lot has gone right for the Cardinals this year. They came into the season with a talented roster and hopes of contention but have repeatedly struggled to get into a groove. Their record sits at 38-52, placing them 11.5 games back in the National League Central and 11 games back in the Wild Card race. They don’t often find themselves as clear deadline sellers, having only once finished below .500 this century, which was way back in 2007. But barring a massive turnaround in the next three weeks, they will likely be selling this year, something that president of baseball operations John Mozeliak essentially admitted earlier today.
Thankfully, there are some factors that could make this a particularly fruitful sell-off for the Cards. For one thing, the expanded playoffs and some wide-open divisional races are seemingly making this year a seller’s market. The Cards have a number of controllable position players they could move without significantly hurting their chances of returning to contention next year. They also have some impending free agents of note, such as Jordan Montgomery and Jack Flaherty.
Another impending free agent who should be garnering plenty of interest is reliever Jordan Hicks. The fireballer has been in the club’s bullpen since 2018, though Tommy John surgery in June 2019 prevented him from appearing in the latter half of that campaign or at any point in 2020.
His performance in his career has been unusual in that he has elite velocity, averaging over 100 mph on his fastball in his career. But somehow, that hasn’t translated into the huge strikeout numbers one would expect. By the end of the 2022 season, he had tossed 177 2/3 innings over 147 outings, striking out 23% of batters faced. That strikeout rate is right around league average, whereas other gas-spewing pitchers like Aroldis Chapman, Edwin Díaz or Félix Bautista often run their rates into the 40s or even the 50s.
Here in 2023, Hicks seems to have finally unlocked a new level in that department. He’s thrown 36 2/3 innings over 36 outings, punching out 32.9% of batters faced. His 13.8% walk rate is still on the high side but that’s right in line with his previous work and not too dissimilar from other late-inning arms. Chapman has walked 12.4% of batters faced in his career. Josh Hader is at 10.2% in his career and 11.3% since the start of 2020. Hicks is getting fewer ground balls than in previous seasons but his 53.5% rate this year is still well above league average.
The new strikeout rate has helped to lower his ERA to 3.93, compared to 4.84 last year and 5.40 the year before. He likely deserves even better, as his .357 batting average on balls in play is above league average and above his marks in previous seasons. His 3.47 SIERA and 3.12 FIP suggest he could get even better results if that BABIP normalizes going forward. He’s also produced these results while ascending into the closer’s role with Ryan Helsley on the injured list, with Hicks racking up seven saves in the past four weeks.
One thing that might be fuelling this breakout is a change in his pitch mix. He has primarily been a sinker-slider guy in his career, with 90% of his offerings being one of those two pitches, while also occasionally mixing in changeups, cutters and four-seam fastballs. According to Statcast, Hicks had thrown only 20 four-seamers prior to his surgery and then just nine over the past two seasons. He has thrown 73 of them this year. He’s also added a sweeper, throwing 150 of those this year, with opponents batting just .107 and slugging just .250 in plate appearances ending with that offering. The sweeper seems to pair well with his sinker/two-seamer, as shown in this tweet from Rob Friedman, aka the Pitching Ninja.
This is still just a few months of results we’re talking about, but the change in repertoire seems to point to a legitimate progression as opposed to just small sample noise. The Cardinals would surely have preferred to be in contention right now, using this new and improved version of Hicks to bolster their chances in a postseason race. But they will at least have the opportunity to squeeze some extra future value out of it via trade prior to the upcoming deadline. If he had discovered this new level of performance next year instead, they may not have benefited from it at all.
The timing is also potentially significant for Hicks personally, allowing him to go into the open market with a strong platform season if he can maintain it for the next few months. He cracked the Cardinals’ Opening Day roster in 2018 when he was just 21 years old and has never been optioned, putting him on pace to finish this season with exactly six seasons of service time and thus qualify for free agency just after he turns 27 years old in September. Relief pitchers don’t usually secure very long deals in free agency. No one has ever topped five years and contracts of that length are quite rare.
Some clubs may be skeptical given that he has a longer track record of being just okay and will have a much smaller span of time with the improvements. But we have seen clubs take significant gambles on pitchers based on limited samples before. Drew Pomeranz was a starter for much of his career but transitioned into more of a relief role in 2018 and 2019 before getting a four-year, $34MM deal from the Padres. It was a similar story for Liam Hendriks, who had been closing for two years, one of which was the shortened 2020 season, before landing a $54MM guarantee over three years from the White Sox. Robert Suarez spent most of his career in Japan before parlaying one strong MLB season into $46MM over five years.
That’s not to say that Hicks is a lock to secure a contract similar to those, especially since few of those deals have worked out well for the signing clubs, which may lead to more hesitancy in the relief market this offseason. But clubs have shown they are willing to bet on a small sample of improved results when they have reason to believe it could be carried forward. Those three pitchers were all in their early 30s when they secured their deals, whereas Hicks will be significantly younger.
Hicks has always had the velocity and now seems to be figuring out how it deploy it in a more effective way than he ever has before. With his quick rise through the minor leagues and time missed due to his surgery, he’ll be hitting the open market at an usually young age for a relief pitcher and with very few total innings on his arm. For now, he should be able to help the Cardinals recoup some extra value at the deadline before helping himself cash in this winter.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Four4fore
Cardinals should make an extension offer and trade him if he doesn’t accept.
gwspaulds
No, they should trade him while his value is high. With his injury history and his violent delivery, the perfect time to move him as it at the deadline. Teams will take a chance and overpay.
DonOsbourne
Having a consistent role and the pressure of the 9th inning seem to elevate his focus enough to allow him to throw strikes more consistently. But I still don’t really trust him. This small sample “breakout” has been fine. I hope another team is fooled into believing the hype. I think Carlos Martinez is an apt comparison.
nottinghamforest13
He’s never been particularly reliable when the chips are down. The recent results are deceptive similar to if you looked at Carlos Marmol’s stat line. On paper, it’s fine, but boy was it an adventure getting there and probably not sustainable long term.
hiflew
I wouldn’t count the Cardinals out. Remember last year, they were the hottest team in the league in the second half after being fairly mediocre in the first half. Now they weren’t quite as bad as this year, but the team has enough talent to turn things around. At least enough to get into contention and maybe even sneak into the playoffs.
btharveyku08
Sure but they should count themselves out. There’s not enough talent in the pitching corps to do anything of note. Forget sneaking into the playoffs only to get ousted as soon as possible again.
kripes-brewers
Problem is, you still have Marmol in the dugout, so that simply isn’t going to happen. Worse, you have Mozeliak orchestrating what is likely to be several trades. If Cards fans are lucky, it’ll only involve the pure rentals who they don’t wish to offer extensions to. It is odd to see that franchise in such a poor position.
gwspaulds
I absolutely agree. And Mozeliak isn’t moving on from Marmol anytime soon.
I do think though that they could move more than just the players due extensions. I honestly would love it if they moved Contreras. I love his energy and as crazy as that sounds, we already have a catcher in Herrera who can hit at this level. I mean that’s why they got Contreras in the first place was for his bat. It wasn’t his game calling or how he works with a staff, it was his bat, which was a big mistake. Not sure though how many teams would want him and how the players on the team would feel about that move but who knows.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
They had Mike Schildt at the helm when they went on that huge second half winning streak though…I highly doubt Marmol could sustain such a prolonged period of winning. I think this team has the talent to turn things around, but not with that clown Marmol leading them.
gwspaulds
This season is different though. Too big of hole and they really don’t deserve to have a chance to climb out of this hole. They’ve been bad across the board. A soft rebuild is in order. I just hope Mozeliak doesn’t make one move and call it a day.
Hemlock
> I wouldn’t count the Cardinals out.
Oliver Marmol, is that you?
Seamaholic
That’s a heckuva generous definition of a “breakout” … 36 innings of 4 ERA ball in a pitcher friendly stadium.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
I agree. He throws the ball really hard – it is might impressive – but that does not make him elite. He is an injury risk and the dirty birds need starters more than Hicks.
solaris602
Totally agree. I was surprised to see MLBTR make such a glowing endorsement. Up until this season it seems like Hicks is bouncing between the IL and struggling big time to find the plate. He throws darts, and I commend him for the bit of a run he’s had this year, but to believe he’s figured it out will require about another year of sustained performance.
CardsFan57
He was really bad at the first of the year. The breakout has been his last 30 games. His ERA is 2.87 for that timeframe. That should have been mentioned in the article.
smuzqwpdmx
More importantly than ERA for a reliever, he’s giving up 1.500 WHIP — the worst of his career, so kinda the opposite of a breakout. Who’s paying for a reliever that puts tons of guys on base?
CardsFan57
Again, the first 6 games were horrible. His last 30 games covering 31 innings have a 2.87 ERA and a 1.24 WHIP.
That’s when the breakout started.
smuzqwpdmx
Those aren’t dominant numbers for having excluded his worst six outing stretch of the first half. If you cherry-pick parts of half-seasons you can make the vast majority of relievers look better than that.
CardsFan57
Focusing on recent performance for possible rental trades is pretty normal. It’s certainly not cherry picking. The buyer doesn’t normally care if the performance carries into the next season. The point is that Hicks has been a very solid reliever for the last 10 weeks. That might be attractive for a contender seeking bullpen help. The word dominant didn’t appear in the article or in the comments unil you just used it.
micro_maniac8
The 2023 Park Factor for Busch is 104.
CardsFan57
Are you pointing out that the terrible Cardinals pitching has turned Bush into a hitters park this year after years of being more of a pitchers park?
SweetBabyRayKingsThickThighs
Smoke and mirrors but he should be flipped for something decent
King of Cards
Hicks is similar to Flaherty. If you want upside he’s going to be one of the better options available at the deadline. But there is risk that you wouldn’t get from some other options.
I think he makes sense for a fringe contender more than a sure thing contender. Those teams should be more willing to take a chance. The upside is real when he’s on and throwing strikes he’s hard to hit. Very similar to Flaherty and I expect both will he dealt.
King of Cards
When you can throw 102 it’s hard to call it smoke and mirrors. That analogy doesn’t reapply apply.
ammiel
I am interested in this notion that its a seller’s market! Its a bit more complex than that, isnt it? When there are bunches of teams that could sell, and not actual sellers, Nearly all teams well at least say 25 of them will be looking to buy, not necessarily sell.
Big whiffa
That’s what makes it a sellers market. The deadline is WAY to early for all these playoff teams and there’s only a few teams that have anything to sell off in the first place. So white sox are poised to cash in
ammiel
I agree the white sox should get some nice returns for Giolito and maybe Kopech if they sell, and probably a decent piece for Anderson. It will be very interesting to see what gives beyond the Sox though, so many teams are buyers, and the semi-interesting pieces are not going to fill anything like all of the buying teams needs, unless truly creative trades proliferate.
King of Cards
What about Flaherty and Hicks for Fletcher and Mantiply from the Diamondbacks?
I think that’s fair.
stan lee the manly
This wouldn’t make any sense for the Cardinals, they already have a logjam in the outfield and they would be targeting youth and control, not aging pitchers. Doesn’t fill any needs that the Cardinals have.
dankyank
Why not just trade with the Orioles for Krehbiel? He’s another right hander, has quality numbers at AAA and would cost a lot less.
Big whiffa
Why’s everyone hating on the cardinals pitching ? Didn’t they draft Zac gallen and sandy alcantara ?
bassrun
Hicks is a thrower, not a pitcher. I cringe every time he’s given the ball.
Degaz
Hicks is overrated. 4 ERA this year and 5 ERA last 2 years. Yes he throws 100+ but he’s not that good. Not even sure he’s an average reliever. Not sure what the author is smoking…
FrankRoo
These recent articles are sort of bizarre. Breakout? He’s still walking 5.6/9 with an ERA near 4.
The recent article on Leiter Jr was also weird. As if the Cubs hit the lottery on a solid middle reliever? Merryweather has been just as good for them.
Weird editorials from MLBTR.
But It Do
Ok, so what teams might want him? What’s a preview of his trade market:? What kind of contract might he actually be able to get in free agency, if not ones like Pomeranz’s/et al? I’d rather read about this than regurgitated stats from Baseball-Reference and Statcast. Fangraphs does the statistical stuff better anyway. MLBTR’s lane is coming at it from a transactional perspective.
astrostl
His 2023 MLB-worst (all positions, 100 PA minimum) -30 UZR fielding runs per 600 PA rate drives a negative bWAR and fWAR despite very good offense. I normally default to waiting and seeing, especially after a position change from 3B, but he looks so poor with the glove out there to me that I wonder how long it can go before shipping him to DH. With a practically forfeit season, it does at least make for a solid year of real practice.