With the trade deadline now less than two months away, we at MLBTR are setting our sights backwards for a bit to highlight past trades of rental players to provide a loose guideline of what sort of returns fans can expect with their teams’ current rental players. With an arbitrary cutoff point of 2017-21, we’re counting down the top 10 returns that a team got when selling a rental player. We’ve already published some honorable mentions as well as entries No. 10, No. 9, No. 8 and No. 7. If you disagree with our rankings, let us know! It’s all part of the subjective fun! Onto No. 6…
The 2021 season marked a turning point in Cubs franchise history. Half a decade had elapsed since the team’s curse-breaking 2016 World Series run. The “dynasty” chatter that followed that seven-game victory over Cleveland never really manifested into reality. Chicago was a perennial contender, but that vaunted Cubs core never reached the World Series again and only won one game beyond the National League Division Series before the group was suddenly nearing the end of its time together.
Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, Javier Baez, Willson Contreras, Kyle Schwarber, Jon Lester, Jake Arrieta and Kyle Hendricks was a sensational group of talent around which to build, but Hendricks was the only one of the bunch to put pen to paper on an extension. The group continued inching closer to free agency, and as Lester and Arrieta declined in their latter years in Chicago, some of the shine wore off. The Cubs were a good team, but year after year, the season ended with now-former president of baseball operations Theo Epstein making similar comments about how the “offense broke” or something else went wrong.
Following a 2020 season that saw the Cubs swept out of a three-game Wild Card series against the Marlins in the expanded playoff format, Epstein stepped down from his role as president and turned baseball autonomy over to Jed Hoyer. It was baptism by fire in every sense of the cliche, as Hoyer faced a series of unenviable decisions, beginning with Schwarber. Fresh off a .188/.308/.393 showing in 244 plate appearances in 2020, Schwarber was non-tendered rather than offered a raise heading into his final year of arbitration. Not four weeks later, Yu Darvish was traded to the Padres in a salary-motivated deal that has to date produced just one prospect of any note (Owen Caissie).
Decision time was only just beginning for Hoyer and his staff. The Cubs would need to determine how to proceed with the trio of Bryant, Rizzo and Baez, each of whom were slated to become free agents following the 2021 season. Prior extension talks had never resulted in a deal — though Baez was reportedly quite close to signing before baseball grinded to a halt with the Covid pandemic in 2020. Chicago made one final effort to extend Rizzo that spring, but he spurned their five-year, $70MM offer (and has since banked three years and $56MM in guaranteed money with the Yankees).
The Cubs could’ve traded any of the bunch that offseason, and Bryant’s name in particular echoed throughout the rumor mill as much as it ever had. Ultimately, all three stayed put, and thus the ensuing narratives that would dominate the 2021 Cubs season were set into motion. Would any of Bryant, Baez or Rizzo stay? Was the core finally breaking up? Was this the team’s last chance?
The lackluster offseason headlined by trading the prior season’s Cy Young runner-up should’ve answered that final question on its own, but the Cubs surprised plenty of onlookers by not only fielding a competitive team but vying for first place in the division for much of the first few months. As late into the season as June 24, the Cubs were eight games over .500 and in a first-place tie for the NL Central lead with the Brewers.
A subsequent 11-game losing streak — the first of two 11-game losing streaks for that year’s Cubs — removed all doubt, however. By July 8, the Cubs were below .500, and the surging Brewers had remained hot. They held a 9.5-game lead over the second-place Reds, with Chicago and St. Louis tied for third in the division. The fire sale was coming, and virtually everyone knew it.
Rizzo was the first to go. A July 29 deal sent him to the Yankees in exchange for 19-year-old outfielder Kevin Alcantara and 24-year-old righty Alexander Vizcaino. A day later, Baez was following Rizzo out of Wrigley. Traded alongside right-hander Trevor Williams, Baez went to the Mets in exchange for 19-year-old outfielder Pete Crow-Armstrong. For the next 24 hours, there were serious questions about whether a trade for Bryant would ultimately come together, but in a buzzer-beating deal, Bryant was shipped to the Giants in exchange for 21-year-old outfielder Alexander Canario and 24-year-old righty Caleb Kilian.
You can perhaps call the inclusion of Baez cheating a little bit for the purposes of this series, because Williams’ inclusion meant it wasn’t *technically* a rental. The Mets acquired two months of control over Baez and a year-plus of Williams in this swap. That extra year of control over Williams surely factored into the decision to part with Crow-Armstrong to an extent, but this was a trade about acquiring Baez first and foremost. Baez caught fire down the stretch for the Mets, too, posting a huge .299/.371/.515 slash in 186 plate appearances. The Mets still missed postseason, however, and the trade surely stings when looking at what’s become of the player they surrendered.
Fast forward less than two years, and “PCA” is regarded as one of the sport’s top outfield prospects. He’s ranked within the top-30 overall prospects in the sport on the most recent lists Baseball America, MLB.com, FanGraphs and Keith Law of The Athletic. ESPN’s Kiley McDaniel has the “low” ranking on Crow-Armstrong… at No. 39 in the game. Regarded as plus-plus defender in center field with plus speed, Crow-Armstrong has opened the season with a .278/.345/.513 showing in Double-A (131 wRC+). He’s knocked eight homers, seven doubles and three of triples while going 13-for-17 in steals.
Obviously, the Cubs haven’t yet gotten any big league value out of Crow-Armstrong, but it’s rare for a team to acquire a prospect in exchange for a rental and see him almost immediately ascend to the point that he’s regarded as one of the top 15 to 30 prospects in all of baseball. If the Cubs wanted to do so — they surely don’t, to be clear — they could use Crow-Armstrong as a headline piece to acquire just about any controllable veteran who hits the market this summer or next offseason. The likelier path for PCA is that he’ll be given every opportunity to become a franchise center fielder for a still-retooling Cubs club.
There’s no nitpicking with the other two swaps in this three-for-one entry. Rizzo and Bryant were shipped out as two-month mercenaries in exchange for a quartet of prospects, although Rizzo took to the Bronx quite nicely and is now locked in as a Yankee through the 2024 season. There was plenty for the Yankees to like, as Rizzo hit .249/.340/.428 (113 wRC+) down the stretch, swatting eight homers and seven postseason doubles before tacking on another dinger in that year’s Wild Card loss to the Red Sox. In parts of three seasons as a Yankee, Rizzo is a .245/.344/.468 hitter with 51 home runs.
I doubt the Yankees regret making this swap, but it’s worked out nicely for the Cubs as well. Alcantara, now 20 years old, isn’t as highly regarded as Crow-Armstrong, but he entered the season ranked No. 91 on Baseball America’s Top 100 prospect rankings. He’s dropped off that list after a slow start in High-A (.250/.281/.389), but he still sits at No. 75 at FanGraphs and is generally a very well regarded prospect.
It’s worth bearing in mind that those pedestrian High-A numbers have been posted against competition that is, on average, nearly two and a half years older than Alcantara. The towering 6’6″ toolbox is also just a season removed from a much heartier .273/.360/.451 showing in Class-A, where he was nearly two years younger than the league’s average player. He’s a ways off, but like Crow-Armstrong, Alcantara has significantly elevated his stock since that 2021 trade. If the Cubs were so inclined, he too could be a significant piece in any potential deadline trade for controllable big league help. That’s not likely to happen — granted, it’s a bit more plausible with Alcantara than with Crow-Armstrong — but Alcantara has become a reasonably high-profile prospect.
That’s not the case with the now-26-year-old Vizcaino, though the circumstances surrounding his departure from baseball remain unclear. The Cubs placed Vizcaino on the restricted list in 2022 after he failed to report to spring training. He spent the entire year on the restricted list. The Cubs non-tendered him last offseason, and he didn’t sign with another team. Details surrounding Vizcaino’s abrupt departure from the game are basically nonexistent. The obvious hope is that he’s happy and healthy wherever he’s at, but it’s a disappointing outcome for the Cubs.
As for the third and final chapter of this deadline trio, Bryant proved an important pickup for the Giants. True, San Francisco would’ve made the postseason regardless, evidenced by their MLB-best 107 wins that season, but they edged out the division-rival Dodgers for that NL West crown by a margin of just one game. Bryant’s solid .262/.344/.444 slash may not have been in line with his peak form, but he contributed a meaningful presence in the Giants’ lineup down the stretch. They’d go on to fall to those same Dodgers in the National League Division Series, but not through any fault of Bryant’s. He delivered an 8-for-17 performance in the NLDS, adding a homer and a walk with only three strikeouts in 18 total trips to the plate.
Unlike with the other two trades, Cubs fans have at least gotten a look at one element of this return, although the now-26-year-old Kilian’s big league work to date hasn’t been pretty. The 6’4″ righty is still widely regarded as one of the organization’s best pitching prospects, but he’s been tagged for 20 earned runs in 14 2/3 innings through a pair of very limited auditions. He’s pitched 148 Triple-A innings as a starter over the past two seasons, logging a 4.32 ERA with a 24.2% strikeout rate against an 11.1% walk rate.
Command wasn’t an issue for him prior to reaching Triple-A, but he struggled with walks last year. It’s encouraging that he’s walked just 6.8% of his opponents over his past seven Triple-A starts, pitching to a 3.09 ERA along the way, but Kilian has also plunked six hitters in that time so he’s not out of the woods with his shaky location just yet. He’s in the mix to come up and make some starts this year still, and depending on how he fares, Kilian could be a candidate for a rotation spot either later this season or in 2024.
As for Canario, he finished second among all minor leaguers with 37 home runs in 2022 and hit .252/.343/.556 across High-A, Double-A and Triple-A. He added 23 steals (in 26 tries) and walked at an 11% clip, though his 27.5% strikeout rate was more concerning. Baseball America calls him a potential low-average slugger with plenty of walks, above-average speed and above-average defense in right field. He hasn’t yet gotten a chance to build on last year’s breakout, as he dislocated his shoulder while playing in the Dominican Winter League.
We’re just shy of two years removed from the Cubs’ deadline fire sale, and while it’s still early to grade the overall strength of their return, things are looking promising. To trade three rental players and come away with a pair of top-100 prospects — including one who’s widely ranked in the top 25 — as well as a near-MLB starting pitcher and a strikeout-prone but prodigious slugging outfielder with power, speed and defensive upside is objectively impressive.
On the one hand, it’s a testament to the caliber of the players the Cubs were trading, but not all trades of star players result in this type of return. The Orioles have still barely gotten anything from the Manny Machado trade nearly five years after its completion. The Rangers’ trade of Darvish to the Dodgers netted them one immediate top prospect, but two years after the deal that prospect (Willie Calhoun) was already looking like a questionable big leaguer.
The tail-end of the development phase for the prospects acquired here — particularly Crow-Armstrong — will define this series of trades. But four of the five prospects acquired in this slate of trades have enhanced their stock since joining the Cubs, who now have a handful of near-MLB-ready talent and/or trade chips to show for parting with a trio of popular veterans. The 2021 trade deadline was a dark few days for Cubs fans, but there’s a good chance it’ll wind up leading to some brighter times ahead.
Images courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Unclemike1525
The Cubs got one other prospect in the Darvish trade to keep an eye on. Ismael Mena is a CF who just hit A ball and the dude can flat out fly. He’s also hitting pretty well so far but it’s a small sample size to be sure. He might even be a better CF than PCA in the end. Still early but promising.
Robertn623
They also got owen cassie in that deal
Unclemike1525
They mentioned Caissie. They said they got no other decent prospects. The other 2 are still in the system but aren’t looking like anything special. Mena might be special.
thecoffinnail
That is good to hear because PCA looks like he hasn’t finished filling out and imagine the power he will unlock with another 20-30lbs. I know PCA received an 80 grade for his defense but playing a far less demanding position will allow him to concentrate on hitting when MLB pitchers make their inevitable adjustments. When was the last time the Cubs had 2 legit CF prospects? I can’t remember the last time they had one that actually turned out besides Jerome Walton back in 89. He was a flash in the pan but man I used to hit the ball for miles when I used his crazy batting stance in the cages. Good year to be a Cubs fan. Can’t say the same anymore. Since the Crickets have had them their shine seems to have worn off. Can’t exactly explain it but they don’t seem to be as special anymore plus I really don’t like how the stadium turned out. Sorry ranting and raving like usual…
JoeBrady
Ah yes, I remember so many Cub fans screaming about how cheap the owner was, and how the Cubs should’ve extended Rizzo, Baez, and Bryant. Fun times!
Wadz
Cubs fans also were complaining about the spending stopping.. since.. Theyve spent big on Suzuki, Stroman, Taillon, Swanson,.. and still stink.
Lanidrac
It’s only the second season of the rebuild, and they are getting better. They’ll likely be legitimate contenders again at the very least starting next season, partly because they have been spending on some pretty good free agents.
drasco036
If the Cubs spend on a huge bat, two solid relievers and a TOR starter (and if Stroman doesn’t opt out) they might contend.
avenger65
Gonna take more than one year to bail out that sinking ship.
Lanidrac
Then it’s a good thing for Cubs fans that it will be the 3rd year next year for a ship that is rising rather than sinking.
hiflew
How is this in the top 10 when the Cubs have gotten virtually nothing thus far? Yes, it COULD turn into a trio of great deals for them, but all they are now is names on a page. These deals belonged in the honorable mention “too soon to tell” grouping.
avenger65
Not a cubs fan, but this is how to rebuild a team. Thanks, Steve, for clarifying who went where, what the team got in return, and how each trade worked out.
thecoffinnail
You got a lil something on your nose… Only thing missing from your comment is a few floating hearts above it.
RunDMC
I mean, aside from Crow-Armstrong (whose a nice bldg block), did they receive anything much of value (aside from comp picks) from letting Rizzo, Baez, Contreras? I mean, they didn’t get anything (not even a comp pick) for Schwarber, who was a star (that faded) then blossomed elsewhere. If nothing else, could they not be blamed for poor timing on all of this – IF they don’t lock-up these guys OR are identified as not the right fits for the future?
Stroman is a perfect example of either hammering out a workable extension for a guy that fits or trading him while his stock is high, if you determine going in another direction.
Cmurphy
I liked Schwarber, still do, but he’s hitting no better than Patrick Wisdom. He did well with the Red Sox but that Phillies contract looks like an overpay..
RunDMC
I’m not saying CHC should have paid Schwarber that, but since they did that, you know there was at least more interest than getting zero in return for him.
JoeBrady
I doubt there was any interest. He had a .701 OPS, was a DH in waiting, and was going to get $8-9M in arbitration, They simply cut him.
avenger65
And the Red Sox and Phillies are glad they did.
Baseball Babe
And Nats!
Spotswood
Yeah, I’d rather be paying Wisdom $800K instead of $20M for similar numbers and the worst OF and in baseball. No thanks
Unclemike1525
Canario led the Minors in HR’s at AAA before he got hurt. Killian has been good and bad. He could still figure it out. Alcantara is a top 100 prospect. Wesneski has been good. The returns have been pretty good so far. Not sure what you’re trying to say.
hiflew
Leading the minors in homers is not exactly a ticket to stardom in the majors. It CAN happen as it did to Kris Bryant, Pete Alonso, and Mike Moustakas. But it can also give you the career path of AJ Reed (who led the minors in HRs twice), Dallas McPherson, Kevin Witt, Mitch Jones, and Kevin Cron.
I believe his point is that none of what happens in the minors really matters. The big league club has gotten nothing from those trades as of right now.
Your reasons included the phrases “before he got hurt” “been good and bad” “could still figure it out” and “has been good.” I think that alone should make you aware of what he is trying to say.
drasco036
I think it’s premature to give the Cubs much credit here since not a single prospect has made an impact on the major league roster as of yet.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, the Cubs are not close to coming out of their rebuild and continuing to be lead by Ross puts them a step backwards. This is a .500 offense, a winning rotation but a god awful bullpen and worse manager.
The Cubs really need to trade off Stroman, Smyly, Hendricks and Bellinger and hope two of those guys bring back an impact player. Then spend on actual impact, middle of the order talent for one of the corner infield positions and an ace to pair with Steele (bring Stroman back after dealing him and sign a big time arm).
The Cubs have solid pieces but just like last off-season, lack impact. Happs good, Swanson is good, Suzuki, Hoerner are good. But I count one lead off hitter, three guys who should bat second and zero guys who can drive in runners. Gomes is solid all around, I’m fine with Barnhart occasionally but you cannot build the rest of the line up with Mervis, Morel, Wisdom and have a bench of Mastobouni, Rios, Trauchman (who’s been good) or anyone else who brings nothing to the table.
Unclemike1525
Drascoo-I never understood the Suzuki signing. I understand less and less the Happ extension. Extending Stroman would be a mistake IMO. You said it Happ is good.But now he’s being paid like he’s great. He is a little better than last year I guess. Jury is still out on Bellinger. He still might be their best 1B. They need someone in the middle of the order who drives in runs. The line up has too many holes and Ross has no bench, That’s on Hoyer. If you’re Ross and you look down the bench and see Mastro, Rios, Barnhart et al, Do you start weeping? I would. Wisdom is hopeless. Screw the HR’s, Every time he comes up in a big situation he whiffs. He only homers when the game is out of reach and pitchers just throw him fasballs to get the game over. I said launch him and got vilified. The whole team has so much swing and miss it’s pathetic. Only Hoerner and Swanson will move runners over but they’ve given up because there is nothing behind them to drive in a run. I still say Mervis will be good when he learns the zone because he hits the ball hard a lot. Hoyer’s bullpen magic has failed miserably. I don’t know what you think you’re getting for any of these guys, But it’s not much IMO. Lottery tickets.
Wadz
RIcketts got tired of the fanbase complaing about the spending on a rebuilding team drying up and spent for the sake of it.
drasco036
Stroman and Bellinger should bring back something real talent wise in trade. Stroman has pitched like an Ace and Bellinger has played like an All-Star while playing fantastic defense in center. Smyly continues to pitch well enough with a second year, that should be pretty valuable. Hendricks has been meh, let’s see after a couple more starts.
I’m not sure why you think Belli should play first unless you are thinking of re-signing him and moving him there once PCA is ready but even then I think I’d look to either move Suzuki in trade or Happ to first before Bellinger due to his defense.
As I said, I want Madrigal at third for the for the rest of the year and regulate Wisdom to bench/first/super utility. Trauchman to the bench when Belli comes back and splitting time at dh with Mancini.
Hendricks has to be caught by Gomes plain and simple.
Unclemike1525
Madrigal is tearing up AAA but what happens if he comes up and hits .220 again? CF should be a position of strength in the future. I’d be happier if Bellingers option was held by the Cubs and not a mutual one. I think one more year of him in CF would be perfect. Hendricks sell by date has passed. I don’t care if he is healthy or not. I don’t want to see him anymore. He’s in the way. Are you really going to send Wisdom up as a PH in a big situation? Wisdom’s best position now is DFA. Stroman is 32 and the money he wants is too much for what he brings. He probably wants 5 years. You gonna give him that? Not me sir. There’s still work to be done. I thought this team had a shot. With all the whiffs, I don’t see it anymore. I always thought Mancini was a professional hitter. He surely hasn’t been that so far.
drasco036
If he comes up and doesn’t hit so be it. He still adds contact to the line up and he won’t hit unless he’s given a chance to play everyday.
Would I take Wisdom over Barnhart in a PH situation? Absolutely. With the DH, we shouldn’t be pinch hitting as much as we are.
You don’t know what Stroman wants and have no idea what it would take to re-sign him. Heck, this site whiffed big time on Stromans estimates before the Cubs signed him.
Coincidence, maybe, but Hendricks posted a 2.83 in six starts with Gomes last year, this year a 3.86 in two, one masterful and the other not very good. One things for sure, he’s best bet is to continue to pitch to Gomes.
JoeBrady
Stroman and Bellinger should bring back something real talent wise in trade.
==========================
I agree. The Cubs have done some decent work, but have a lot more work to do. The worst thing teams can do is to think they are further along than they really are.
As an ancillary benefit, they are really close to 28th place. The pursuit of a top-3 pick should not be overlooked.
Spotswood
“Hendricks sell by date has passed. I don’t care if he is healthy or not. I don’t want to see him anymore. He’s in the way.”
Yeah, he’s terrible.
Spotswood
Amaya caught his 1-hitter.
Spotswood
Should they DFA the guy that leads the team in HRs and RBIs before or Hendricks?
Unclemike1525
Yes. Wisdom is hitting like .129 over the last month with 1 HR. And now Hendricks will probably have to be skipped in his next start to preserve his precious 88 MPH shoulder. At least from everything I’ve read Steele will probably be coming of the IL in time to fill in.
Spotswood
ah… I see. for some reason it’s personal between you and Hendricks. Cause he’s been throwing 88 mph stuff for a career 3.40 ERA. But now we another prediction from you. Hendricks is going to skip his next start… Your history of backing players or predicting their decline isn’t strong. You would not shut up about Mervis, and now not a peep. You wanted Killian, that didn’t work. You whined about Wesneski. That didn’t work out. You wanted Morel, how has his last 2 weeks gone?
Spotswood
I’m going to spend some time to go back over that last several months of your proclamations… It’ll be fun to see how they aged.
“I’m still quite leery of what or even if any help Hendricks can provide. I think I’d take the under of 5 starts made at the Major League level.”
mlbtraderumors.com/2023/04/injury-notes-skubal-hen…
How ya feeling about this one?
amanda_hugandkiss
Canario badly injured his ankle running through first base in AZ Fall ball. Just FYI
Unclemike1525
Well for your information he got hurt in the Dominican Winter League but who cares about facts right?
amanda_hugandkiss
Canario badly injured his ankle running through 1st towards the end of AZ Fall Ball. This after throwing out MVPish numbers prior. Just FYI
Unclemike1525
Canario never played in the AZ Fall League. Wake up please. Do some research.
Deleted Userr
Should have traded all of them (yes including Contreras) after 2019.
ACK
I would hardly call trades for prospects that have yet to do a damn thing in the majors as winning a trade.
rondon
It is if you’re a rebuilding team.
drasco036
The Cubs right now need to call up Madrigal and place his butt on third from now on and move Wisdom to first/super utility. Never ever ever should we see Wisdom, Mervis, Morel and Barnhart in the same line up at the same time. Truth be told, it Barnhart is catching either Mancini should play first or Bellinger when he comes back and have Trauchman play center those days. The all or nothing approach (which seems to be what Ross wants) needs to go.
Wilmer the Thrillmer
The decision to non-tender Schwarber was the only really poor move I can remember the Cubs making during their rebuild. I think getting Canario and Killian for Bryant could pay dividends for the next 7 or 8 years.
drasco036
I agree on Schwarber, although I wasn’t a huge Schwarber fan.
I thought it was a really poor move to cut a guy who ultimately was not making a ton of money and was coming off a really solid 2019. The Covid season i didn’t put much stock in because it was only 60 games and a lot of guys simply had outliers of seasons. Kyle’s advanced metrics that year suggested he ran mostly into bad luck vs being bad. Then to compound that by signing Joc Pederson later in the off-season.
Granted, there were other things involved, specifically money, the Cubs had to think about and that scope changed dramatically from mlb saying they would allow zero fans to allowing x amount of capacity later in the off-season when Pederson was inked.
The Cubs perfect storm of Covid and the Wrigley renovation project money due was what truly spear headed the Cubs rebuild. People wanted to complain about Ricketts comments about not making much money but ignored that ownership funded the renovations 100% to the tune of nearly a billion dollars… not to mention paying a billion dollars to buy the team not all that long ago.