Cody Bellinger made three plate appearances for Triple-A Iowa last night, marking the first game of his minor league rehab assignment. The former NL MVP has been out of action since May 16 due to a left knee contusion, but appears to be making good progress towards returning after close to a month on the 10-day injured list.
Bellinger played first base for Iowa, which Cubs manager David Ross said (to the Chicago Sun-Times’ Maddie Lee and other reporters) was partially due to Bellinger still having some difficulty fully extending his knee during all-out sprinting. Even when Bellinger returns to the Cubs lineup, Ross left the door open for the outfielder to see more time at first base, noting that “[Mike] Tauchman’s swinging the bat really well and held down center field pretty well. So [we’re] just trying to find the best lineup whenever Belli gets back.”
First base isn’t at all an unfamiliar position for Bellinger, as he has 262 career appearances as a first baseman during his seven MLB seasons. However, he made only four appearances at first base in 2021 and none at all in 2022. Bellinger’s injuries and struggles late in his stint with the Dodgers obviously factored into this decreased usage, not to mention the fact that Freddie Freeman took over full-time first base duty in 2022.
But, using Bellinger at first base was also something of a waste of a strong outfield glove, as Bellinger won a Gold Glove and Fielding Bible Award for his right field work in 2019, and has been an above-average defender in center field. This glovework and strong baserunning helped Bellinger continue to earn playing time in Los Angeles even amidst his two-year funk at the plate in 2021-22.
The Dodgers opted to non-tender Bellinger this past offseason, and the Cubs inked him to a one-year deal worth $17.5MM in guaranteed money. That includes a $5MM buyout of a $25MM mutual option, but it would seem quite unlikely that both sides would choose to exercise their option, as Bellinger was prioritizing one-year contract offers in order to return to the open market next winter with a better platform season on his resume.
Chicago’s bet on a Bellinger rebound has to some extent paid off, as prior to the month-long IL stint, Bellinger hit .271/.337/.493 with seven homers in his first 163 PA in a Cubs uniform. The sample size is still too small to draw an overall conclusion about a bounce-back, however, and Bellinger did have only a .512 OPS in the 49 PA prior to his IL placement, so some regression might have already been at play.
There hasn’t been any indication that Bellinger’s knee problem could prevent him from returning to the outfield altogether, so the first base usage might indeed be just the Cubs’ way of getting him onto the field a bit earlier and start ramping up for his eventual return to the Major League roster. Tauchman has also been solid (.274/.403/.323 in 78 PA) for the Cubs since his minor league contract was selected on the same day as Bellinger’s IL placement.
In the bigger picture, the 29-37 Cubs aren’t too far out of the picture in the weak NL Central, but the team might again be looking at being sellers at the trade deadline. A 32-year-old journeyman like Tauchman probably isn’t in the Cubs’ long-term plans, so Tauchman in center field might be a preview of what Chicago’s post-deadline outfield could look like if Bellinger is dealt elsewhere.
Assuming Bellinger returns healthy and keeps hitting, he’ll be a very interesting trade chip for the Cubs to offer at the deadline, and there’s bound to be plenty of interest given how many teams explored signing Bellinger last winter. Bellinger as a center fielder naturally has a lot more value than Bellinger as a first baseman, yet if sprinting continues to be any kind of an issue, first base is at least a fall-back position that allows him to contribute in some capacity.
Matt Mervis? More like Matt Nervous with Belli getting reps at 1B amirite?
How long have you been waiting to use that one? Definitely forced it into the comments area of an article that didn’t mention Mervis at all.
This Cubs team is so poorly constructed and managed that they’re reduced to finding ways to keep a non-entity like Mike Tauchman in the lineup. I’ve taken a lot of criticism for describing the Rickettses as cheap and for calling them out for putting an intentionally mediocre (at best) product on the field. If this situation isn’t good enough to prove my point to other people, I don’t know what is.
As a writer, I know Cubs fans don’t handle critical thougjts about their team well. So just ignore them. But Ricketts cheapness aside, Jed has spent his money very poorly. And Ross is not a good manager.
You probably take a lot of criticism because you’re ignorant and you don’t do yourself any favors when you make idiotic comments, like bashing a guy who currently is hitting .275 with an obp over .400 and is happening to play some very solid, borderline outstanding defense in center.
Plus there’s some additional power upside with Tauchman considering his career ISO is about 90 points higher than what it is currently so if he had his career ISO paired with the rest of his batting line he’d be batting .274 .403 .411 . Not bad for a minor league signing indeed
@Doug…. baseball-reference.com/players/t/tauchmi01.shtml. Are these numbers your definition of mediocre?
Tauchman’s career OPS is 91. That’s less than mediocre. By “product on the field,” I mean the entire team, not just Tauchman. The ownership’s plan was to assemble a mediocre team and sell it to gullible fans as a contender. They couldn’t even pull that off.
Tauchman was inked (to a minor league deal) for his defense in center field, not his offense. The fact the Cubs are getting plus offense from him at the moment is a win for the team.
Of course they will continue to play Tauchman in center when Bellinger gets back since he’s been the hot hand with the bat. Given the Cubs have gotten jack from DH and 1st base, it only makes sense to continue rolling him out if they can continue getting at bats for Belli, Happ and Suzuki.
The problem with a lot of you “haters” is you want to bash the franchise but you have no idea what you’re talking about and it just makes you look and sound foolish.
*OPS+ is 91
So better than Jake Meyers, Julio Rodriguez, Michael Harris, Michael Taylor, Senzel, Margo, Varsho, and about 30 CFs…. Niiiiiice!!!
Easy, big fella. Let’s see what Tauchman’s stats look like at the end of the season. I wouldn’t be surprised if you thought that Rafael Ortega was a long-term solution in center field for the Cubs as well.
Well Tiny, I do believe you were the one to start throwing out stats…. For a guy that wants a full season, should probably use more than OPS+ to support your silly comments.
Great point on Ortega though. For a season, Ortega was outstanding. Tauchman probably won’t have that type of power, but solid comparison. I’d happily take that production from Tauchman. Way to come around on this…
Imagine spending precious moments of your life defending the likes of Nick Madrigal, Mike Tauchman, and Rafael Ortega. People like you make it so easy for the Rickettses.
More interesting, is when you look at a stat like +wRCA, which is a better indicator for a CF, Tauchman is a top-15 CF in MLB. I was down on Tauchman, but appreciate you bringing this all up. Based on +wRC, he’s better than Varsho, Yastrzemski, Fletcher, Bader, Marsh, Margot, Outman, Meyers Julio Rodriguez…Great news that the Cubs backup CF is better than all those guys!! Well done Jed Hoyer…
You choose interesting hills to die on.
I consider myself an educator, and take special interest in those that are in need of the most help. I also consider it a useful service for the MLTrade community.
Your rather high opinion of yourself isn’t warranted.
Based on your comments, you’re in the group that needs my help the most.
You’re welcome!
You seem very easily triggered. What’s it like having me live rent-free in your head?
Probably what it’s like for your mom to have you live rent free in her basement…
Actually, she charges me $500/month. Smart mom.
Does she pay for your clown shoes too?
No, your mom bought those for me in exchange for the things that she and I do in her basement. ;
😉
My mom is 72. You realize that’s a bigger reflection on you than anything else…
I’m 80. What can I say? I like younger women.
Aaahhh… Now all your outdated, wandering, incoherent comments make more sense… I apologize, it’s probably tough dangling mentally between reality and darkness.
That’s ageism, you young whipper snapper! I’m going to tell your mom during our next rendezvous!
Bellinger has 1.5 bWAR in 37 games. Assuming 150 appearances in a year, that is in pace for about a 6.0 WAR year. The current free agent market price per 1.0 WAR is about $6, meaning that Bellinger’s productivity this year is highly likely to end up way, way past what the Cubs gave him. In fact, he only needs about 1.2 more WAR to make his 2023 contract a fair deal.
So, blow it out your ears.
I don’t have a problem with Bellinger. The fact that the Cubs are going to keep playing Tauchman after Bellinger returns shows how far this team has fallen since 2016.
Tauchman has been getting it done both at Iowa and with the Cubs all year. Anybody who says otherwise should think about rehab. Even if Happ-Bellinger- and Suzuki are in the OF there is certainly room for Tauchman as the DH. It would be really refreshing to have a DH who can actually hit for a change.
A DH with a SLG of .323? That’s almost Madrigal-esque. I’ll give Tauchman credit for taking walks and having an OBP of .403, but he’s barely an above average hitter this season (OPS+ of 102) even if you take that into consideration. Yes, Tauchman’s small-sample-size stats might look great relative to those of other Cubs DHs, but that’s only because the Cubs have had some of the worst DH production in the NL this season. Tauchman might be an okay fifth outfielder, but that’s it. Dude’s 32 years old and has had one good (half) season (2019, when the ball was juiced) in his entire career. Please stop being satisfied with these players from the scrap heap. Cubs fans deserve better.
I wish being stupid was painful
Are you off your meds? Did mommy finally give you your computer access back? Seriously, how can you be on a site for baseball fans and have such little baseball knowledge?
PS, Tauchman has exactly 0 appearances at DH for the Cubs.
“Tauchman has exactly 0 appearances at DH for the Cubs.”
Facts are simply annoying details that only get in the way of a worthless option.
I never said Tauchman played any games at DH. I was responding to Unclemike1526’s desire for Tauchman to get playing time at DH.
Apparently nobody has noticed Tauchman has been hitting leadoff so who cares what his slugging % is? Tauchman as a leadoff DH would be light years better than any DH the Cubs have had so far. Mancini, Hosmer, and since we’re at it what are Mastrobuoni and Madrigals slugging %? They’ve all been DH’s this year in Ross’s lineups of death. Really?
I don’t know what Tauchman is going to do for the rest of the season and neither does anyone else. And nobody said Tauchman was a LONG TERM solution to be the Cubs CF. I only know he’s been getting it done so far and I’m enjoying the ride. Spotwood always says I’m hard on guys because he thinks I don’t like them. Well I like this guy so far and he’s sparking a team that was lame and now they look better. I also am wondering when Ortega had this miracle run because I missed it. I thought he always stunk.
Mike, Ortega had 330 PAs in ’21. Slashed 291/.360/.463/.823, +wRC 122, 11 HRs, 12 SBs. Mostly hit leadoff where he had a +wRC 135.
That’s outdated, behind-the-curve thinking. Sure, OBP is an important stat for leadoff hitters. But they’re not guaranteed to lead off innings more than once per game. What is guaranteed is that no other batter will have more plate appearances in any given game. With all those plate appearances and potential RBI opportunities, good teams realize that a leadoff hitter with a SLG of around .400 or higher is also a valuable asset. Why were the 2016 Cubs so darn good? Partially because Dexter Fowler had an OBP of .393 AND a SLG of .447.
The fact that Tauchman (for the moment, at least) has better batting stats than the sad sacks who have DHed for the Cubs so far says more about how bad this team is instead of how “good” Tauchman is.
The fact of the matter is that the Cubs have had a decent leadoff hitter candidate this entire time, but boneheaded David Ross refuses to put him there. I’m talking about Ian Happ. Yes, I’m not happy that the Cubs gave him that contract, but he does have an OBP of .387.. His .389 SLG does not justify him batting third or cleanup in the batting order. Plus, he already has experience being a leadoff man. If the Cubs must have Happ, they might as well put him in a lineup spot where he’d be the most useful.
Right now, the Cubs have only two options for DH: bad and worse. Given his track record, it’s doubtful that Tauchman keeps his OPS above .700 for the entire season. You’re certainly more optimistic than I am that he can do that.
Bless your heart for being able to enjoy the splendor that is Mike Tauchman. Keeping him in the lineup might be the difference between the Cubs finishing 77-85 instead of 76-86, assuming that he can maintain his current batting line.
This. He posted those statistics in mostly meaningless games during the second half of the 2021 season. His 2.0 WAR was the reason the Cubs finished 71-91 instead of 69-93. What a hero!
The above is my response to educator Spotswood’s paean to Rafael Ortega.
Meaningful PAs. Meaningless opinion. You’ve dribbled apple sauce on your gown again.
Just doing my part.
Don’t worry, your mom just wiped it off. She has a lot of experience wiping things off me. 😉
You clearly prefer “meaningful” plate appearances to actual meaningful games. That’s a great approach if you prefer fantasy baseball to the real thing.
The reason the Cubs were good in 2016 was because Fowler got on base and was fast enough to score from first on a KB double. Also, because KB got on base and was fast enough to score from second on a Rizzo double.
The reason they started to decline was because Schwarber and Zobrist couldn’t run the bases well and couldn’t score from first and barely could score on a double.
That was the male nurse servicing you again.
Come to think of it, your mom does look like a male nurse. But hey, every guy has his type.
You don’t seem to notice the difference, doubt you ever did.
You mean that your mom was a man this entire time? Let my freak flag fly!
Right now = as long as David Ross isn’t putting Ian Happ in the leadoff spot.
At least they don’t have albatross contracts and bad vets blocking their youth movement. It could be worse. Bellinger is an example of the good bets their placed. No need to super stink during a rebuild.
According to Jed, they’re not rebuilding.
Drugs are bad, mmmkay?
Speak for yourself because it all depends on where you’re getting them from.
What size clown shoes do you wear?
Small sample size, of course.
Your favorite kind.
I wear the Clown shoes.
All I see in your pic is a clown nose.
Better late than never when it comes to reporting I guess.
Too bad for the Dodgers. They gave up on a guy who’s 23% better than league average. Dodgers clearly don’t know what they’re doing.
Yes, definitely – their success as an organization is quite easily defined by letting go of a guy who had a .611 OPS over two seasons prior.
Dodgers are class right now. They develop great youngsters, revive and reinvigorate vets, and sign professional stars. Bellinger was a guy they could afford to replace. World Series victory is not benchmark for MLB success, sustained relevance is.
Tiger fan here. We wish we were you.
His 23% above average this year doesn’t do much for what the Dodgers paid him the last 2 years. He also would have gotten a raise in arbitration, rather than taking the cut in pay he took when he signed with the Cubs. Also, Dodgers are currently holding a wild card spot, while the Cubs are not. So which team doesn’t know what they are doing?
He probably would have gotten 18M in arbitration. Getting 17.5M from the Cubs for one year or 27.5M for 2 years. Doesn’t sound like a huge cut.
The cubs are total tools. Bellinger is using them to prove he’s still the player he was before that unfortunate celebration. What do the cubs need with a broken down outfielder who’s plan is to play no more than a season (if that) with them when they’re rebuilding? That’s not the way to do it. And now Bellinger can’t even play the OF.Anyone need a 1b man with a bum knee?
Who wants to pay a guy who stunk 3 out of the last 4 yrs 17-18 million a yr? I’ll take the Dodgers MLB acumen over the Cubs all 7 days of the week.
The cubs are total tools. It’s no secret that Bellinger was looking for a team to give him a one year contract so he could prove he’s the player he was before that unfortunate celebration. The cubs knew that but signed him anyway. What does a rebuilding team need with a broken down OF who can only play 1b? Bellinger hasn’t helped himself much in his quest to play for a contender and the cubs have wasted time in their rebuild.
@avenger: Avenger are you just jealous that Ricketts is spending money – and trying (hoping) to win THIS YEAR, and not just kick the can down the road in the late stages of the rebuild – like a certain owner down at 35th and Shields?
Yes
Dodgers signed Jason Heyward, who is 26% better than league average and are paying him the league minimum while the Cubs pay for both Bellinger and Heyward’s contracts.
No Cub fans wanted to see Heyward in a Cub uniform for another game. His performance over his contract warranted his release. What he does with the Dodgers is irrelevant. Guys just ne d a change at times. Maybe he was too comfortable with his contract with the Cubs and didn’t care about results. Now that he’s in a free agent year, he finds that his results matter.
It is not my money, I haven’t spoken with 1 Cub fan that angry that the Cubs released Heyward and then paid Bellinger. Sorry
$17,500,000 guaranteed? Holy smokes that’s alot of money for a player that has been a disappointment for several years. Didn’t realize the Cubs gave him that much just hoping for the best.
The guy wins MVP then announces the following spring that he changed his swing. No way he’s worth anywhere near the money the Cubs gave him. They got fleeced and he should be signing minor league deals trying to make a club somewhere.