The Guardians have traded infielder Nolan Jones to the Rockies for infield prospect Juan Brito, according to an announcement from Cleveland. It’s an out-of-the-blue swap of talented young players.
Jones, a former second-round pick, appeared among Baseball America’s list of the game’s top 100 prospects each season from 2019-21. He consistently put up quality numbers in the minor leagues, posting some of the game’s highest walk rates to run top-tier on-base marks. Jones struggled a bit during his first crack at Triple-A in 2021 but still entered this year among BA’s top ten Cleveland prospects.
The 24-year-old started the season back at Triple-A, but he performed better in his second go-around at the level. In 248 plate appearances, he put up a .276/.368/.463 line with nine home runs. The Guardians called him up for the first time in July, and he picked up his first 92 big league trips to the plate. Jones hit only .244/.309/.372 while striking out a third of the time in that limited look, but there’s still plenty to be intrigued about in his long-term profile.
Jones owns a .252/.361/.443 mark across 655 plate appearances at the Triple-A level. He’s walked in 13.7% of his trips to the dish there while connecting on 22 home runs and 36 doubles. A lofty 28.4% strikeout rate leads to some questions about his bat-to-ball skills, but the combination of power and plate discipline makes him an intriguing addition for the Rox.
The Philadelphia native came up as a third baseman, although he increasingly saw more action in the corner outfield this year. Prospect evaluators have long suggested he could be an adequate defender at the hot corner, but the position was obviously spoken for long-term in Cleveland by José Ramírez. The Rockies already have a franchise third baseman of their own — albeit not one of Ramírez’s caliber — in Ryan McMahon. With McMahon playing elite defense at the hot corner, Jones will probably factor more immediately into the corner outfield and designated hitter mix. The Rockies have Charlie Blackmon for another year to split time between right field and DH, while Kris Bryant will hopefully stay healthy and lock down left field. C.J. Cron is the presumptive starter at first base, but Colorado can rotate Jones’ left-handed bat into the mix alongside Cron while also keeping Blackmon off his feet more often.
Turning to Cleveland’s end of the swap, they land an interesting lower-level prospect from an improving Colorado farm system. Brito, who recently turned 21, spent the entire 2022 season in Low-A. He hit .286/.407/.470 with 11 home runs through 497 plate appearances, walking in an excellent 15.7% of his trips against a meager 14.3% strikeout percentage. Baseball America only placed the Dominican Republic native 30th on its midseason ranking of the Colorado farm system, but Guardians evaluators are clearly far more bullish on his upside.
Brito has played almost exclusively second base in the minors. He’s not regarded as a particularly impressive defender or athlete, but he’s a switch-hitting middle infielder with an excellent minor league track record. The Guardians have prioritized players with impressive bat-to-ball skills and the ability to play a key defensive position, and Brito certainly fits that mold.
With Brito already eligible for the Rule 5 draft, Cleveland immediately selected him onto the 40-man roster. The Guardians often navigate roster churn around the Rule 5 date as they swap out depth types or players who are becoming more costly via arbitration for further away talent. This is not that kind of move, however. Both players occupy a 40-man spot, and neither is within two years of reaching arbitration. Both can still be optioned to the minor leagues — Jones for one more year, Brito three times. Brito surely won’t factor into the MLB mix right away, but this marks a fascinating swap of unproven young players — one seemingly motivated by each team simply valuing the player they’re bringing in more than the player they’re shipping away, not by contractual provisions or roster reshuffling.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Curly Was The Smart Stooge
It’s bad enough being associated with the “Guardians”, but being traded from them?
dixoncayne
You must still play 8 tracks
njbirdsfan
Let’s come up with a team name mocking cops or the military or whatever you hold dear on the right, and wait how long until you get offended. Because you will snowflake.
jdgoat
Woah! Has his prospect shine faded this much or is he just a part of the roster crunch?
Rsox
Jones isn’t supplanting Jose Ramirez from 3B anytime soon. With Josh Naylor, Gabriel Arias, and Jhonkensy Noel 1B will be covered for years and with Kwan/Gonzalez/Valera/Brennan and down the road Chase DeLauter, he didn’t do enough to stay in the OF mix.
Could be a move the Guardians end up regretting but only time will tell
YourDreamGM
Roster space and able to add high upside. I would have done this trade.
seamaholic 2
Brito is a very good prospect. He’s nowhere near 30th on the Rockies list (more like 8th or 9th, and the Rox system is quite deep). But they’re swimming in middle infield prospects so could afford to lose one.
Velo
He’s good but not top 10.
Redsoxx_62
Why?
Lookat Me
Agreed!
OIC2021
Quick analysis of the trade:
Brito is the superior player based on how often he walks versus how often he strikes out. Nolan Jones was awful on this.
Good get for the Guards
A'sfaninUK
Walks/K’s in the minors doesnt mean anything and the Guards need OF now more than INFs later. Bad analysis.
OIC2021
He played the OF too
Check your facts
iverbure
Walks/k’s definitely matter in the minors as always A’sfaninUK is wrong
JoeBrady
Walks/k’s definitely matter in the minors as always A’sfaninUK is wrong
=================================
Not exactly, but close. High walks in the minors can easily fade away if you don’t have enough power to keep the pitcher from grooving FBs to you.
But a bad K/W in the minors is usually a prelude to a bad K/W in the pros. It almost never gets better. Jones had a weak 64/31 in AAA at age 24, with good but not great power.
Brito’s 78/71 is excellent, and his 11 HRs in 402 ABs might project high enough to make him a reasonable hitter.
A'sfaninUK
Yeah because players put up the same numbers in the minors as they do in the majors.
iverbure and the 5 morons who liked their comment dont know ball
Windowpane
Good grief, man. Chill out.
seamaholic 2
Jones is known for his BB’s, and Brito has never faced pitching more advanced than low A. As the writer says, this is an intriguing deal with lots of possible outcomes. I wish there were more like this.
OIC2021
Jones hit only .244/.309/.372 while striking out a third of the time
King Floch
It was less than 100 ABs, which isn’t anywhere near enough data to reach any meaningful conclusions.
lucas0622
Head scratcher for sure
lucas0622
I get trading Nolan as part of a package for a big league bat, or him 1 for 1 with a guy of similar pedigree that is ML ready and addresses a need
Brito is exactly the type of player Cleveland already has so many of, and won’t be ready for 2 years minimum
Samuel
lucas0622;
I understand your point.
But Cleveland has so many good young position players that Tito can’t find playing time for all of them.
What they can use – and I believe they will find this off-season – is another ML starting pitcher. Am sure they’re negotiating. But Nolan on his own was not going to bring that back.
What I assume they’ll be doing is including at least one of their young middle infielders in a trade, so this way they get another youngster in the pipeline.
Samuel
Angels signed yet another LH starter today.
They need a middle infielder.
Cleveland has no LH starting pitchers.
Windowpane
Pilkington and Cantillo are lefties.
YourDreamGM
Cleveland is fine with 2 or 3 years.
mlb9229
For real though…when isn’t a Rox move a head scratcher…
hiflew
Is he an infielder? BR says he is a RF and he played all his games in the OF in 2022.
lucas0622
Infielder converted to RF
Trafficked
Third base…. But it’s occupied…. Guardians 40 man Issues created some decisions and he doesn’t have a clear path to playing time…
norcalguardiansfan
Woah – I’m blown away. Didn’t think they would deal Nolan.
Samuel
Cleveland has far too many LH hitters – especially OF’s.
Happy for Nolan that he gets a ML chance hitting in the mountains.
This can work out very well for the Rockies.
(And of course Brito is a switch hitter…..couldn’t have accepted a guy that just hit RH.)
Sa'ed Faoul
Cleveland does need more pop in its lineup so I guess that is the risk with this trade
thome612
they must have doubts in jones game, particularly his outfield glove. i think his attitude can be rather r crappy as well.
#1WhiteSoxFan
I hope the White Sox front office carefully considering potential trades of their strengths to bolster their weakness in the minors.
kanye
Ye approves
.
Ye, is your “Academy” still open? I want to make a hefty donation before tax season…I want you feeding the kids steak and lobster atleast 2X a week though ok? Cool? And every person in your employ there needs to make 300K before taxes
..
kanye
The kids always come first.
.
I knew I liked you. Before you announce your new run 4 Prez give us a heads up so we can be ready to spread the word!
kanye
With the recent news of Trump running I think I’m going to aim for a VP spot
.
Welp, Ye, Trump has already kicked De Santis in the teeth a few solid times so I know he is out of the running for Veep…So if Tulsi Gabbard doesn’t get the role I’ll ride with you..
Yankee Clipper
Wait, Timmy Trump is running for Prez?! That’s awesome! He can do his little Diaz-trumpet dance-song thing that plays on repeat everywhere for his platform.
I had no idea guys, thanks for letting me know!
JRamHOF
Guards will be making a lot of trades this winter
baseballpun
There are too many Nolans. I am not a crackpot.
seamaholic 2
But the Rockies were fresh out, so it makes sense.
sufferforsnakes
Cleveland’s front office has always had a woodie for light-hitting middle infielders. Wish they’d just trade Tyler Freeman, so he’d have an actual chance to play.
Hello, Newman
Woodie, haha, I haven’t heard that in awhile
Nolan looks promising, but this kid looks just as good. Time will only tell
Dock_Elvis
Exactly where the pro scouting dept shines.
tomyo10
Jones had a long swing. Cleveland loves the bat on ball approach. Still, I bet he develops into a nice power hitter.
hiflew
I am happy with this deal for the Rox. Jones can possibly help the team in 2023. Brito would have needed to take a 40 man spot and probably not been able to help the big league team until late 2024 or 2025 at the earliest. The Rockies have made this mistake several times before with international free agents only to see players waste option years and in some cases never even make the majors.
In nurse follars
Appears that Jones was not a player who would make a difference in a major trade package. Another 21 year infield option maybe means depth if other young infield options are traded. Jones was not going to play third, the team apparently does not want a full time DH, and he strikes out too much. Also, valara may make his debut this year.
baseballdadof4
I was able to see Mr. Jones play numerous times when he was with the Rubber Ducks. He made some great plays at the hot corner and always hit the ball hard. He was super nice to my boys and he gave them numerous game balls in between innings. I wish him well in Colorado and I am genuinely sad that his time in Cleveland has come to an end.
Waz1
Best analysis of this trade I’ve read anywhere. Well done.
PunkRockies
Love it for the Rockies. Needed a LH power bat in the OF and we have too many IF prospects to mention. Now I’m worried that this is the sign of the apocalypse though, as it’s not like the Rox to make sensible moves.
CIPERSPECTIVE
All the arguments I have heard here support trading Jones. The key was whether this was a fair trade. By MLB pipeline ranking it wasn’t (Jones #7 in the Guardians system, Brito #30 in the Rox system). By ability to impact a ML lineup right now, it wasn’t (Jones with his ML debut this year, Brito spending the entire year at low A with no mid-season promotion as good prospects get). The Rox were motivated to trade him as they didn’t want to put a low A guy on their 40-man while the Guardians had no NEED to trade Jones as his roster spot had to be taken up by Brito. Brito has one tool, ball-to-bat. No speed, no defense, no power, plays a position (middle infield) where the Guardians have excess. He doesn’t fill a need. Plus, and this is most important, on a normal development path he gets here in 2025, meaning all 3 of his minor league options will have been used when he gets to the majors for the first time. In the meantime, he clogs the Guardians ML roster giving them, functionally, a 39-man roster if you are looking to backfill your 26-man roster with internal options or even free agents. There is nothing about this trade that makes it a positive for the Guardians. You want to say that Jones needed to be traded? Agreed. Just don’t say this trade needed to be made right now by the Guardians or that it is anywhere near an even trade as EVERY factor says the Guardians blew this trade out their rear ends. The only way this trade makes sense is if they wanted to dump Jones for some off-field stuff and Brito was the lottery ticket they picked for window dressing to make it look like a baseball trade. Otherwise, this trade hurt the Guardians now (in losing a relevant trade asset) and in the future (blocking a 40-man roster spot for 3 years with little chance of that spot helping the ML team)..
Waz1
I think the Guards front office has earned the right, based on past trades that for the most part have turned out very well to get deferential treatment on trades (so long as it’s not trades involving the Rays). They must have seen something in this kid and he fits their profile. I don’t get hung up on team prospect rankings after 1-5.
At one point Jones was ranked close to another third basemen named Nolan, Gorman of the Cards. Their paths have diverged greatly.
CIPERSPECTIVE
I disagree with your analysis, Wazi. I did an analysis of the last 4 years of Guardians trades. Of 18 trades they clearly won 4 (Clevinger, Kluber, Leon and Straw. They lost 8 (Trevor Bauer, Tobias Myers, Yandy Diaz, Yan Gomes, Luplow leaving, Eddie Rosario,, Vargas and now Jones. They won 4 (Clevinger, Kluber, Straw, Sandy Leon coming the first time). 6 were even (Cesar Hernandez going, Bradly Zimmer, Lindor/Carrasco, Luplow coming, Walter Lockett coming, Mark Mathias leaving). What people remember is the Clevinger trade, which was a complete outlier. How many times do you make a trade for six players, and they all turn out to be ML players or top prospects. If has to be close to zero in ML history! Kluber looks good because Clase developed into a closer.. Plus the Clevinger and Kluber trades look better because both pitchers were hurt for much of the time after their trade. So, when people say the Guardians make good trades it is based on 2 examples when, overall, they have a poor record in trades.
Regarding your comment about Nolan Gorman, look at his stats this year. Very much like I would imagine Jones would have put up in the same sample size and Jones is a better defender in RF than Gorman is at 2B. One more point about Gorman. He struggled so much this year he had to be sent back to AAA. Imagine if he had used up all his minor league options. He couldn’t have been optioned without being DFA’d. That is what Brito will be like in 3 years if he even develops at all. Low A stats (and even high A stats) are rarely extrapolatable to major league stats. The telling thing about Brito’s 2022 season is that he did not get a mid-season promotion like most good prospects do.
CKinSTL
That’s a very simplistic way of evaluating success by evenly-weighting trades. Trading a guy like Clevinger is far more impactful than trading Bradley Zimmer (who was going to be DFA’d). There are also other motivations for trades, such as clearing roster space, salary relief, etc.
If you look at Cleveland’s success last year, there is no doubt it would have been unachievable without success from the Clevinger, Kluber, Lindor/Carrasco, and Maton deals.
CIPERSPECTIVE
Agreed. No way we had the success that we had without those trades. the point I was trying to make is that the fact that we had that success in no way justifies the Jones for Brito trade. Others were making that generalization about Cleveland winning trades and I was just pointing out that they won only two important trades. Combined with breaking even on the the Lindor trade, those 3 trades were the only ones, out of 18 trades, that made a difference. The Bauer trade is especially useful in this discussion as don’t believe that any of the guys we got in that trade are even on a ML roster this winter. Sort of the opposite of the Clevinger trade.
CKinSTL
Agreed that any prior success does not justify the Jones trade. But Cleveland’s front office is generally well-regarded, so they often get the benefit of the doubt. Of course, not all their moves work though but it is not unreasonable to have a general sense of confidence in that group.
For many trades, it just isn’t reasonable to expect a “difference maker” in return. Sticking with the Zimmer example, what could they reasonably expect for a guy about to get DFA’d? They ended up getting a small amount of salary relief and a pitcher that essentially served as AAA depth. Looking at the simple alternatives (keeping Zimmer, DFA’ing Zimmer or making they trade they did), I’d say they made the right move. You could argue, however, the front office could have traded him when his prospect stock was higher.
Bauer trade was a bust. That was one where they gave up big value and ended up with nothing to show for it.
As the the Lindor/Cookie trade.. analyzing from Cleveland’s perspective, they were trading 1 year of Lindor and 2-3 years of Cookie. They got far more on-field value than they traded away, at a fraction of the cost, and they still have another year of control on Amed and Gimenez is pre-arb. That’s a big winner in my book.
yes
Guardians: bridesmaid power.
SuperJoe
This is a sign that Antonetti knows he has to trade at least one and possibly TWO of his highly ranked SS prospects. Brito restocks the pond in that case. Jones got passed by Gonzalez and Brennan, and Valera is coming fast. Can’t keep all your guys. This is what the Rule 5 draft is designed to do, give fringe prospects a path to new opportunities.
CIPERSPECTIVE
SuperJoe, the only way this makes sense to me is if the Guardians think Brito is much more valuable than Jones, not just a better long-term fit but of approximate equal value. Otherwise you just hold onto Jones to find the best, fair trade that matches your needs sometime this off-season. This trade looks like Colorado had us over a barrel instead of th other way around. That is the frustrating part for me. Brito is not generally considered as good a prospect as Jones. Brito and the Guardians are now put under the gun to get him to the majors in 2 years or less so they don’t run out of options before he gets here. Everything is against Guardians in this trade and it shouldn’t have been. It was Colorado who would have lost Brito in the Rule 5. One last point: If the Guardians think that they have a glut of outfielders AND LH hitting outfielders, why did they just draft 3 more in the first 5 rounds of the amateur draft, two of them being hit more than power guys? I hope you see why NONE of this (the trade and Antonetti’s comments). When you are a team like the Guardians you can’t blow trades like this and the Tobias Myers trade, especially when you have the other team over the barrel. You just can’t waste resources. Hey, if it happens that a sure thing doesn’t pan out, I get it. Stuff happens. But to know right out of the gate that you have given up more than you received by a large margin AND clogged up your 40-man for the next 3 years before you get ANY return on this trade makes no sense. BTW, when I say given up more than you get, my understanding tells me that when only you value a prospect or potential draftee more than other people it USUALLY means that your evaluation is wrong, not always, but usually.
CIPERSPECTIVE
CKinSTL, I get it. But in this case we were the ones who had Colorado over the barrel. They had to make a trade or risk losing Brito in the Rule 5. We gained nothing of immediate need in this trade and screwed our 40-man with another guy who will occupy the roster for 2-3 years before ever making a contribution at the major league level. The only way this makes sense is if Brito was a hugely better prospect than Jones and he is generally accepted as a fringe prospect and his entire value appears to be based on his work in low A ball. I get that not every trade works out, but if the trade looks like crap out of the gate it is likely bad. Last year I cut the Guardians some slack on the Myers trade which was identical in terms of us having Tampa over a barrel due to the Rule 5. They must have known something about Myers we didn’t know, right? We know how that turned out. When you are a team like the Guardians you can’t whiff on these trades. BTW, we will have to agree to disagree on the Lindor trade. When you trade away one of the best players in baseball you expect a good return. To get two good players for even one year of Lindor we had to throw in a #3 veteran starter. If Giminez and Rosario don’t do what they have done that would be a disaster. Doing what they have done only makes this trade even. In 5 years maybe I have a different idea if we get someone for Rosario and Gimenez stays on his upward trajectory. Saying we won this trade is like saying we won the Sabathia trade because our PTBNL later in that deal turned out to be Brantley.. No, we just happened to get lucky and Brantley turned out to be much better than expected.
thome612
amidst the season, i did some scouting, discovered this brito kid and another rockies farm hand, that looked amazing. I am actually quite happy with this trade. Jones may look nutty playing in coors, i could see him playing lousy on road, having it get to him as well.