The markets for right-hander Nathan Eovaldi and left-hander Matt Strahm are “heating up,” according to Rob Bradford of WEEI. He speculates that one of them could sign prior to the Winter Meetings, which begin on December 4.
Bradford doesn’t specifically link any teams to the two hurlers, but it’s not surprising that they are generating lots of interest. Both of them have shown various levels of quality in the past but neither is likely to command a massive contract, meaning very few teams would be priced out of their bidding. Given that just about every team could use some extra arms, it makes sense that many of them would be kicking the tires.
Eovaldi is an established mid-rotation starter but has shown himself capable of pushing his production towards the front end. In 2021, he made 32 starts for the Red Sox, throwing 182 1/3 innings in the process. His 3.75 ERA might seem to be merely decent, but his 25.5% strikeout rate and 4.6% walk rate were both a few ticks better than average. Advanced metrics felt he deserved much better, with his 2.79 FIP almost a full run better than his ERA. FanGraphs wins above replacement, which is FIP-based, gave Eovaldi 5.7 on the season. That was the third-highest tally among all MLB pitchers that year, trailing only Corbin Burnes and Zack Wheeler.
However, he’s not coming off the ideal platform year, as back and shoulder injuries limited him to 20 starts and 109 1/3 innings in 2022. He kept his ERA down to 3.87 but his velocity was down in the second half and his strikeout rate dropped to 22.4%. This isn’t the first time injuries have been a concern, as he’s twice had Tommy John surgery and also had surgery to remove loose bodies from his elbow in 2019. He’s also turning 33 in February and has been tagged with a qualifying offer, tying him to draft pick compensation. Those factors will put a damper on his market, with MLBTR predicting a two-year, $34MM contract. The free agent market has aces like Justin Verlander, Jacob deGrom and Carlos Rodon, but they are all likely to command nine-figure deals. The next tier features many mid-rotation options like Chris Bassitt, Jameson Taillon, Taijuan Walker and others, but Eovaldi is one of the more interesting upside plays in that group.
As for Strahm, he’s proven himself to be a capable left-handed reliever, which is often more than enough to garner free agent interest on its own. But he’s also hoping to find an opportunity as a starter this offseason, which could expand his market even wider. He hasn’t made multiple starts in a season since 2019, but Michael Lorenzen hadn’t made more than three starts in a season since 2015 when he set out to free agency looking for a starting gig and signed a one-year, $6.75MM deal with the Angels a year ago.
Strahm has a somewhat similar profile and could potentially secure himself a deal in that range, though it’s not a guarantee he’ll take that path. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported today that Strahm is more likely to secure a bullpen job given the weakness of the free agent market in that department. As Rosenthal points out, the other southpaw relievers like Taylor Rogers, Will Smith and Brad Hand all had concerning performances in 2022, while Matt Moore was great but after many poor seasons prior to that. Those factors could lead to Strahm getting a nice offer to be a team’s primary bullpen lefty, which might be tempting enough that he forgoes his plan to jump into a rotation again. He posted a 3.83 ERA in 44 2/3 innings this year for the Red Sox, striking out 26.9% of batters faced while walking 8.8%.
JockStrap
“Bradford doesn’t specifically link any teams to the two hurlers”
We call those “mystery” teams. lol
Jesse Chavez enthusiast
Or Bradford was just needing some clickbait content lol. Nothing else for him to report, might as well spread a “hot market” rumor.
rocky7
Yes, called the former Boston pitchers booster club!
mike127
Love it! Drawing strong interest, yet linked to nobody.
CaptainJudge99
Yeah my guess is Matt Strahm or Matt Moore ends up on the Yankees. Will Strahm cut his hair? They’re’s a lot of stylists in the Bronx. We’ll see.
smitty527
Thought I’d seen all the their/there/they’re mistakes possible but you’ve raised the bar. Thank you, kind stranger.
OIC2021
The Guardians are in close pursuit of both pitchers
RyanD44
Eovaldi on a 3 year, $42-$48m deal will likely get it done. Some projections have put him closer to $60-$70m for 3 years, but can’t see that with a decent market of pitchers similar to him, and he comes with health and durability concerns.
acell10
both of those numbers seem insanely high for a guy who has been largely injury prone and ineffective over his career. If he gets that good for him, I just hope it isn’t the Red Sox handing him that contract.
RyanD44
Well he’s coming off a 4 year, $68m contract as it is, and I’d say he’s more proven now than he was then, but back then he was 4 years younger, which is why I pegged him in the $40-$50m range for 3 years.
acell10
he had one healthy season in those 4 years and I’d argue that he was overpaid over his last contract so I’m not sure that’s a strong baseline for him especially coming off last season.
JoeBrady
I’d say he’s more proven now than he was then
====================
Talent-wise, I’d say more consistent. But injury-wise, I’d say he is riskier now. I’d bet he averages less than 150 IPs/year over the next three years. I wouldn’t mind $32M/2, but I wouldn’t go three.
Salvi
“he had one healthy season in those 4 years”
9 starts in 2020 is his fault? Should Eovaldi continued starting games even though the league was shut down for a virus?
If you pro-rate 2020 to a full season, he averaged 26.75 starts in those 4 years. Chris Sale dreams of having 26 starts in a season.
Salvi
“I wouldn’t mind $32M/2”
Eovaldi turned down 19.65M QO. He certainly is expecting more than 12.35M for the second year.
If Free Agency has taught us anything, it’s easier to find 1 team to overpay, than 30 teams to underpay.
acell10
if you want to take out 2020 he has had one healthy season in the three full years he’s pitched. That still isn;’t a good return on the investment and sale has nothing to with this conversation so nice whataboutism there.
Salvi
Is that some sort of ‘compromise’ on your part. The season you first claimed he was injured in, you’re will to throw it out, because it doesnt work for you anymore. Lol. He was healthy in 2020 and 2021, thats 2 out of 4 years, unlike your “he had one healthy season in those 4 years” And even the 2 ‘injured seasons’ he pitched for 20+ starts.
You were trying to paint the corners, to exaggerate your point, and got called out.
I’d be fine, if he averaged 26.75 starts in a 3 year contract for my team, the same as he did in his last contract.
acell10
I’m hardly painting the corners and I’m not being disingenuous with my argument like you are by trying to extrapolate 9 starts out to a full season worth of stats just to make the numbers look better and comparing him to sale. I’m also not outright lying like you are saying Evoaldi made 20 plus starts in two of those injured season. Evoaldi only had 12 starts in 2019. So your math is completely off. Even if you want to be generous and “pro rate” the way you did (giving evoaldi the prorated 32 starts for 2020) that still only 96 over four season which is 24 a year.
RyanD44
He’s made 10 more starts than Kershaw in the last 2 seasons, 1 less start than Scherzer, 5 less starts than Bassitt, 6 less starts than Max Fried..
So really, he has injury concerns, sure – but has he been a trainwreck? No. Pretty serviceable if you ask me.
RyanD44
In 2019, the Red Sox chose to bring him back as a reliever in July/August because they needed a good arm in the bullpen and then they built him up to a starter in late August/September. Had they built him up right away, he probably makes 18-20 starts instead of 12. He still appeared in 23games.
acell10
Serviceable is what Wacha got paid to be last season. If that’s what he gets I’m fine with it
acell10
RyanD44: He was also awful in 2019 when healthy and didn’t really deserve to be the rotation which is also why he was pitching out of the pen.
RyanD44
Eovaldi is capable of being ace-like on a bad team, and he’s a 2 or 3 on a decent team. I’d put him on the same level as Marcus Stroman, but with more concern about injury. If either one of those guys is your ace, your probably not going to be very good. If one of those guys is your 3, 4 or 5 – you’re probably in pretty good shape.
acell10
I agree with almost all of that.
Salvi
Yep, I gave games pitched, instead of starts by accident. So in 2019, it was 12 starts. If that was a “lie” then you flat out “lied” about 2020 injury.
See how that works. I never called you a liar about your 2020 mistake, I figured it was an error. But now I’m a liar for a similar mistake. Yeah, sure.
Whatever, he gets way more money than you think he’s going to get. Fact.
Salvi
Thank you Ryan. Pretty logical.
Salvi
Youre putting Eovaldi in the same boat as Wacha? Wacha was paid 7M last season. Do you expect Eovaldi to get the same as Wacha did last season, or this season? Lol.
Salvi
Stroman got 3 years 71M. I expect a little less for Eovaldi 60-70M over 3.
acell10
You literally said I was painting corners, and not for nothing implied I was lying by saying how I got called out and how 9 2020 start weren’t his fault etc. etc. Now you have a problem being called out for misrepresenting information. If you really thought I’d made an honest mistake your responses wouldn’t have been full of rhetorical questions dripping with insincerity. Bottom line is if you don’t like being called out for math mistakes and misrepresenting stats then I suggest you do a better job of not acting cocky and checking your work.
acell10
I absolutely am because as I said Eovaldi has been injury prone over the course of his entire career and coming off a year where he missed a third of the season. I never said that I expected Eovaldi to get the same as Wacha, only that he should because that’s serviceable pitchers get.
acell10
If some stupid GM wants to give him that he should sign that immediately I just hope the Red Sox aren’t the ones foolish enough to do that
JoeBrady
If you pro-rate 2020 to a full season, he averaged 26.75 starts in those 4 years.
==========================
If you are using the standard multiplier of 2.7 for 2020, then his four-year run is:
12
24
32
20
It’s not awful, but it is not good. But I’d be more concerned about the bad back that kept him out in 2022. That doesn’t bode well for a pitcher. And he ended the season with a bum shoulder. I’d put the under/over at 64 starts over three seasons.
JoeBrady
I’d be fine, if he averaged 26.75 starts in a 3 year contract
===========================
But it wasn’t 26.75. He missed 3 starts out of 60 games. That’s 8.1 for the season. 8.1 from 32 is 23.9.
acell10
JoeBrady: it was a very cromulent run for Eovaldi nothing more nothing less and I’d take the under.
JoeBrady
Trainwreck, no. But the recency factor needs to be acknowledged. An injury in 2022 is more important than an injury in 2020. An SP that missed 5 weeks with a sore back, and then missed 7 weeks with a sore shoulder?
Salvi
Yes it was covered already. And this is your second time covering it Joe. The correct number is an average of 24 starts I went with games pitched, as opposed to games started. — However, In your calculation he gets nothing for the 11 games he relieved that year.
JoeBrady
it was a very cromulent run
==========================
Why do I suddenly feel the need for a Dunkin Donuts run?
JoeBrady
I see your point, but you are also giving him credits for starts when there is a decent chance he was still injured. I think that’s what they did in 2022. They gave him 3 starts in July to showcase him for a possible trade, but he got hammered.
I don’t really consider those “healthy starts”.
Jaysfansince92
He’s not quite on the level of Stroman. Stroman’s career ERA is around 0.66 lower than Eovaldi’s. Stroman’s FIP is also better.
I feel like people sell Stroman a bit short. He’s had some solid years. 4 full seasons with an ERA of 3.50 or better including each of the last 3 years.
Randy Red Sox
red sox are in close pursuit of more pitchers off the scrap heap
rocky7
“closer to $60-70 Million for 3 years……obviously comes either from Bradford the Boston booster club Pres., or from Eovaldi’s agent desperate to boost his clients worth…….health and durability concerns…..LOL….maybe the signing team should ask for opt outs…LOL
Ma4170
I’ve seen former GMs project Eovaldi at like 4-90, and I nearly fell out of my seat. 3/50-55 range seems reasonable (and if it were my team, I wouldn’t do it).
Ketch
Who, besides his agent, is predicting $70 mill over 3 years for Eovaldi?
RyanD44
Jim Bowden of The Athletic put him at $90m/4 years, and as terrible of a GM as he was, he’s typically pretty close on contract totals.
slider32
I like Jim Bowden and his views, but he seems to minimize the injury factor, and a players ability to post.
kcmark
All pitchers come with health and durability issues.
acell10
Evoaldi’s carries a way more pronounced risk than the typical pitcher,
utah cornelius
He pitched 52 games in the last two years.
acell10
and the season before that when he missed 3 in a the shortened 2020 season and only pitched in 23 with starts in 2019? He’s only made 30 plus starts twice in his career. He’s been injury prone throughout his career.
TrillionaireTeamOperator
Seems like Eovaldi is worth market rate on a one year pact.
1 year/$15M w/ a /$2.5M buyout on a $20M mutual option seems reasonable.
I think Eovaldi was and still is and will remain a $16M-$19M pitcher.
Salvi
Then why didn’t Eovaldi accept the 19.65M QO, if he’s only going to get 17.5M?
acell10
there’s also the real possibility that he might have overplayed his hand. kind of like Comforto did last year…
all in the suit that you wear
acell: Yes, Eovaldi may have overplayed his hand which has teams losing draft picks to sign him except for the Red Sox.
utah cornelius
2/35 beats 1/19.65. Heck 3/42 beats 1/19.65.
TrillionaireTeamOperator
Just because he didn’t accept the $19.65M QO doesn’t mean he was going to match or beat that figure on the open market and as others said, 2 years at even just a $10M AAV would beat that figure- something he can more than get on the open market.
Assuming he doesn’t settle for a one year deal, Eovaldi will absolutely beat the QO- he may even match or exceed it in AAV.
But I do think he is a $17.5M a year pitcher- not for his regular season performance but for his post season/make or break game performances toward the end of the season when the standings are close.
I think he’s about a $9M pitcher most of the year and he’s worth his weight in gold in a lot of deciding games that can make or break a season or a post season etc and for that he’s worth an additional $8-10M a year.
And I am not a Red Sox fan. Also the Red Sox tagging him with the Q.O probably means they won’t reunite on any sort of deal. I mean, honestly- if the Red Sox thought they were going to seriously contend next year, they may have just gone ahead and given Eovaldi a 2 year/$34M extension and kept his pay the same rate as before, thus actually saving a little money through inflation. But that obviously didn’t happen so he will almost certainly sign elsewhere and I think his market value is around $16-$19M a year… or…$17.5M….and if he gets a buyout or 2 guaranteed years, he will beat the QO.
acell10
you’re overrating him based off his post season performance. which was basically 2018 where I admit he was fantastic. Outside of that he was pretty ordinary in 2021.
Randy Red Sox
you are right that the Red Sox know they are not contending.in 2023. Bloom/Henry waiting for their next wave of prospects on entry level deals supplemented with a few Bloom ‘short term-low risk’ signings
Josht
Strahm back to Boston. Eovaldi to Angels
Dotnet22
To sum up the article. These pitchers will be signed by some team at some point…..great.
Alkie
“It’s possible one or any of these pitchers could be signed before an arbitrary future date!”
TrillionaireTeamOperator
Strahm seems like a 1 year/$4.5M w/ a $500k buyout or a 2 years/$9M w/ a $1M buyout on a $6.5M option type of signing.
playhard9
Cardinals should sign both of them. Love Eovoldi’s upside if he is healthy. Mo type deals but God knows we don’t need any more TJ patients.
acell10
Thanks for 2018 Nate but hopefully another team besides the Red Sox will assume the risk on your next contract.
FrontOfficeStan
Eovoldi would not be a Mo style deal. Strahm maybe.
playhard9
You saying Mo doesn’t overpay for mediocrity? Sure he does.
FrontOfficeStan
He is on the upper end of mediocrity which makes Strahm the more likely one.
iH8PaperStraws
It’s almost the poster of a Mozalak move. Had interest years ago, going to be 33 to start the season, injury history, third tier free agent who had one shining moment. It would be Jake Westbrook part 2.
sliderwithcheeze
Carlos Rondon will make ace money but he’s not an ace.
HBan22
He absolutely has been an ace the past two seasons, look at his stats.
Also, it’s “Rodon”…
sliderwithcheeze
He’s asked me to call him Rondon so I’m respecting his wishes.
VonPurpleHayes
He’s an ace, but there’s obviously risk there.
TrillionaireTeamOperator
I respectfully disagree. He’s earned it. He out performed a $22M salary last year. He may not be worth the risk of a 3+ year deal, he may not live up to a 3+ year deal with his track record, but he’s currently an ace and on a 1-2 year deal deserves to be paid like one.
I think a 1 year/$37.5M deal would be fair and appropriate. I think a 2 year/$67M deal would be fair and appropriate. I think a 3 year/$88M deal would be fair but risky and anything more lucrative over 3 years would be inappropriate- but those are all ace level salaries and he’s earned that at this juncture.
MLB-1971
Trillion – You are crazy. He was worth $17,000,000 per year for 4 years (what Boston paid him), but certainly no more than that. Any GM to pay him more should be fired!
MLB-1971
Eovaldi spends WAY too much time on the DL/IL.
Randy Red Sox
fits in well with many of Boom’s FA signings
Inside Out
Another story that is based on nothing but being obvious. Of course the market is heating up, Free agency just started, it is the time when every team reaches out to almost every player and the agents act like there is a big demand. Someone might sign before the winter meetings, or they might not. Yes, that is true for most free agents. Anything could happen.
Eovaldismemes
NASTY NATE TO STL MAKE IT HAPPEN
Samuel
Thought around August that Eovoldi would be a fit with the Orioles. Felt their pitching coaches could clean him up. But with the injuries not sure they would chance it. Don’t know who will.
soxshortstop
No worries…Chaim and RS mgmt already made their big offseason move – Ramon V is the new bench coach. Looking good so far.
Angry Disgruntled Sox Fan
Nice sarcasm, but let’s be honest, there’s more to come.
Randy Red Sox
yes–several more Bloom “low-risk-short term ” signings of guys coming off down years.
Angry Disgruntled Sox Fan
I am okay if the Sox pass on Eovaldi. A decent pitcher but injury-prone and going to ask for a lot of money. He was phenomenal in 2021 but other than that he’s a mid rotation guy.
We could get far better for less money and that has always been Bloom’s approach. It hasn’t always paid off but it’s been his approach to not overspend
slider32
Most GMs are exhausting all trade options right now before they over pay for a free agent. There are other options out there right now that might be better than Eovaldi. Bassett come to mind.
Elwood
Pirates would have been in on both, but they shot their wad on Carlos Santana and some new throw pillows for the front office.
jvent
If the Mets don’t give into deGroms crazy asking price/years, they should sign Rodon , Senga and Eovaldi For the price of deGrom, Bassitt and Walker $80 m) the Mets can sign the other 3 pitchers, Conforto and Voit.
stroh
Eovaldi when right is a top tier pitcher. My guess is that a $20M+ AAV is what it would take.
acell10
outside of 2021 and the 2018 playoffs when has Evoaldi been right?
stroh
Strahm might be an option for Stros bullpen provided price is right