The last time left-hander Cionel Perez was tagged on a post at MLBTR was 11 months ago, when the Orioles announced they’d claimed him off waivers from the Reds. Ditto righty Bryan Baker, whom the Orioles claimed from the Blue Jays two weeks prior. They were the definition of innocuous offseason moves at the time: a last-place team claiming a pair of little-known relievers who’d been waived by non-playoff clubs performing garden-variety 40-man roster maintenance. The moves were met with the expected cynicism associated with waiver claims of this ilk.
At the time, it wasn’t wholly clear whether either would even survive the offseason on Baltimore’s 40-man roster. Perez was out of minor league options, so he’d have to win a big league spot during Spring Training or else be subjected to waivers a second time. It’s not at all uncommon for fringe 40-man players in that spot to eventually be designated for assignment when a team signs a free agent, acquires an established player via trade, or claims someone else on waivers.
Fortunately for the O’s, both Perez and Baker indeed survived the winter on their 40-man roster. Perez fired six shutout innings with just three hits and two walks against seven strikeouts during the truncated Spring Training. Baker tossed four innings of one-run ball. Both found their way onto the Opening Day roster. Prior to this year, Perez had pitched to a 6.04 ERA in 50 2/3 MLB innings, including a 6.38 mark in 2021. Baker had one MLB inning to his name.
Before long, Perez found himself building a strong start to his 2022 season, however, solidifying his hold on a place in Brandon Hyde’s bullpen. He opened the year with 9 2/3 shutout frames, and while an 8-to-4 K/BB ratio along the way was a bit less impressive, he followed that strong first month with seven more innings of one-run ball and an 8-to-2 K/BB ratio. By the time the Orioles’ game on June 1 drew to a close, Perez had pitched 16 2/3 innings with a 0.55 ERA, a 25.8% strikeout rate, a 10.6% walk rate and a 51.2% ground-ball rate.
Along the way, Perez increasingly began to incorporate a new pitch into his repertoire: a power sinker that averaged a hearty 96.6 mph. He’d never thrown a sinker in a Major League game before, and Perez used the offering sporadically through the season’s first three months, only flashing it 9.6% of the time. In mid-July, however, Perez committed to the pitch more decisively, and from July 16 through season’s end he used that new sinker at a 22.4% clip. His four-seamer, which he’d previously thrown 52.4% of the time, saw its usage rate dip to 36.9%.
Perez posted a sparkling ERA both pre-sinker and post-sinker, but the secondary numbers suggest that Perez’s success with the sinker was more sustainable than without. Once he leaned more heavily into the new pitch, he fanned 25.2% of his opponents, walked 9.0% of them, induced grounders at a 52.8% rate and yielded an 88.2 mph average exit velocity. Prior, those rates were 22%, 8.9%, 50% and 89.6 mph. The gains weren’t Earth-shattering, but Perez’s results were better once he gained more comfort with his new pitch. Seventy percent of the sinkers that were put into play against Perez were grounders.
Good as Perez was in 2022, there’s likely some regression in store. His .284 average on balls in play isn’t especially fortunate, but few pitchers can sustain marks as low as Perez’s 0.31 HR/9 and 4.3% homer-to-flyball ratio. He’s also unlikely to continue stranding 87.4% of his runners moving forward — a rate that ranked ninth in MLB (min. 50 innings) behind a collection of some of the game’s most proficient strikeout artists. Still, there’s not much about his 2022 season that portends a complete implosion next year.
Baker took the opposite route of Perez, getting hit hard and hit often early in his first extended look at the MLB level. Through June 19, he’d been tagged for a grisly 5.60 ERA in 27 1/3 innings of bullpen work. The O’s opted to stick with him rather than option him to Triple-A, however, and they’re likely quite glad they did.
Baker threw his changeup less than 10% of the time in those first two-plus months but more than doubled his usage to 21.4% from late June through season’s end. Meanwhile, he continued to up his fastball velocity, averaging 97.3 mph over the final few months after sitting just 95.2 mph through his first 27 1/3 innings. From June 24 through season’s end, Baker posted a 2.13 ERA, 29.6% strikeout rate and 8.9% walk rate.
It’s an open question whether he can sustain the velocity gains he picked up during the season, but his changeup was a devastating out pitch for him down the stretch. Baker finished off 48 plate appearances with a changeup in 2022, surrendering only two hits (both singles) and racking up 25 strikeouts in the process. Statcast credits him with a hearty 37.7% whiff rate on the pitch and gives his opponents credit for an expected wOBA of just .123. Hitters averaged just 83.1 mph off the bat when they put Baker’s changeup in play — with 55% of those batted balls taking the form of grounders.
Neither Perez nor Baker will draw the fanfare of up-and-coming Baltimore stars like Adley Rutschman and Gunnar Henderson, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fill key roles as the team looks to continue its emergence from an arduous rebuild. Perez is controllable for another four seasons, and Baker can be controlled for five more years. There’s some obvious volatility when it comes to year-over-year performance with relievers, so perhaps Perez and/or Baker will come crashing back to Earth at some point. For now, however, the O’s have what looks like a pair of setup men they acquired for free — a quality lefty/righty combo that’ll help to form a bridge to fellow out-of-the-blue breakout Felix Bautista.
Keep in mind that this is the same Orioles team that traded another waiver wire All-Star, Jorge Lopez, prior to the Aug. 2 trade deadline. Building quality bullpens has proven to be an Achilles heel for countless front offices, but at least for the 2022 season, the O’s made it look downright easy. Their ability to continue doing so could well be as important to turning the tide as the arrival of many of the system’s vaunted top prospects.
mercurymets
I think the Orioles are in such a great place right now with their farm system and the fact that they will be willing to spend this offseason. That being said I do think that they overachieved last year and would not at all be surprised if they take a step back in 2023 and finish under .500. However, I think that will be short lived as their prospects continue to come up and get MLB experience. Come 2024, 2025, 2026 I think they will be major contenders in the AL.
miltpappas
No, not under .500. I’m guessing somewhere between 85-90 wins. They’re a lot closer than most people realize.
jbigz12
If anything, we should be at least a little better with guys who can now pitch full seasons & the team should be adding pieces in FA
C Yards Jeff
The Adley effect.
A winning franchise, albeit very short sample size, since he showed up. My gut says because of his defensive gifts (and staying healthy) my Os will continue to trend on the plus 500 side of games played.
Offensively, I’m not a fan. He walks too much and his swing is too long for my liking. Scared he could go in to prolonged slumps. Of course, what do I know, that’s just the very amatuer GM coming out in me.
Brian 38
@ C Yards Jeff – The main object of hitting is to not get out. Adley going 0-3 with 2 BBs is the same as 2-5. He had quite a few games like that. Most times with a run and always making the pitcher work (pitches/AB). Adley is a difference maker on both sides of the ball. Stack OBP for the W!
C Yards Jeff
@brian38; for a number 2 hole hitter, I agree with you. I didn’t put my observation in to context. I picture him as an RBI guy, hitting 4 or 5, maybe 6th in the line up. In this context, get the bat off your shoulders and attack the first good pitch you see Adley.
Ra
Not the same as 2-5. Walks are not driving in runs from 2nd.
But good, still.
Ra
His offense is excellent for a Catcher.
Brian 38
Meh… I’ll take a .400 OBP all day, every day any spot. I hear you. ISO/SLG is a plus in the 3-5 spot (2 as well), sure. But if the line-up makes less outs (OBP), then more pitches/baserunners/runs in the snowballing effect.
It would be interesting to see scoring differences for 2 line-ups with a similar OPS. Line-up 1 with a higher OBP but lower SLG and line-up 2 with lower OBP and higher SLG.
Ra
I will take .300/.350 every day instead of .250/.350, all things being equal. In
Ra
Moreover, OPS is not the God-particle. I wouldn’t place Ryan Howard and Deante Bichette in the HOF and make room for them by removing Rickey Henderson and Tim Raines
Brian 38
I’m not saying OPS is the bees’ knees. In fact, I’m not even talking about OPS. I’m talking about the difference between OBP and SLG.
Rhetorically, would you take a .275/.375/.425 or a .275/.325/.500.? Feel free to shift the OBP and SLG around, but the gist is what is the incremental value of “not making an out” vs. “extra base hits when you do hit the ball”?
Ra
I could find a place for both of those players in my lineup.
stubby66
Funny how this guy assumes they are going to come crashing down. Makes me pull for them even more . I’m guessing Erceg will be this years guy who comes out of nowhere.
utah cornelius
Adams says “perhaps” Perez and Baker will come crashing down. He is not assuming they will come crashing down, as you suggest. It’s a possibility is basically what he is saying. A possibility. And, truth be told, it is. It’s a possibility they come crashing down. Relievers do that. Anyway, pull for Pedrez and Baker “even more” all you want, but it would be weird to credit anything Adams said for doing so.
Michael Chaney
I don’t think he tried to assume that they’re going to implode next year. It’s just recognizing that the Orioles did a hell of a job finding guys on waivers that can contribute to the bullpen.
It usually takes a while before anyone can trust that any waiver claim is a legit player and not just a flash in the pan. If they were so clearly well-regarded beforehand, they wouldn’t have been on waivers.
jbigz12
A lot of these guys were well regarded at one point in time.
The good teams fix them and find that untapped potential.
Mateo, Cionel Perez, Jorge Lopez. 3 waiver claims that were all highly regarded prospects at points in time.
Michael Chaney
You’re right, I just might not have been clear with how I worded it. I just meant that it’s fair to expect a waiver claim to play well over a larger sample size before considering them “fixed” or whatever.
The original comment said that Steve was being pessimistic and expecting those guys to fail, but it’s just being realistic. For every Justin Turner or Max Muncy, there’s a Jeremy Hazelbaker.
Rocker49
The Astros front office knows how to find them, no surprise they continue that now that most have moved on to the O’s front office.
Thank_God_Im_Not_Tim_Dierkes
Yeah, it’s like they bang a trash can to get their attention. When the players hear it they seem to respond by having nothing but success!
jbigz12
The O’s need another high leverage arm.
We really did miss Lopez’s production despite the success we had. These 3 + Tate are a great starting point though.
Othosos
I’d check Lopez numbers after the trade and compare them to Bautista’s. I don’t think we missed anything and in fact we gained four young arms.
Othosos
2022 29 BAL AL 4 6 .400 1.68 44 0 35 0 0 19 48.1 30 15 9 3 17 1 54 4 2 2 196 241 2.99 0.972 5.6 0.6 3.2 10.1 3.18
2022 29 MIN AL 0 1 .000 4.37 23 0 12 0 0 4 22.2 23 11 11 1 14 4 18 3 0 3 102 90 4.35 1.632 9.1 0.4 5.6 7.1 1.29
jbigz12
We missed the production he provided us.
Not what he did in Minnesota. The bullpen was much more formidable when we had another stud set up arm like Bautista.
Bautista is Better than Lopez. No arguments.
nrd1138
Its always great to see a team take a chance on some younger guys and find some gems./
User 3595123227
Orioles need to go ahead and sign up one or both of these guys for the world famous Tommy John Surgery. May or June of next year.
Lefty_Orioles_Fan
Is that what you advise?
Is your advice free?
User 3595123227
Yes that’s my advice. Tommy John Surgery is all the rage. Everyone knows it. I’m a paid advisor.
C Yards Jeff
Baker and Perez. Two of the first graduates from the O’s FO pitching factory. Not all make it. They did. The club definitely has a system in place.
This factory, to date, looks like it has been operating in relative quiet from the bullpens and backrooms at all club levels of the organization. Why? Seems Elias and company prioritized drafting position players over pitchers … that is until this year. Did you see this year’s draft? Heavy on pitching and raw ability type pitching with little focus on past achievement. The organization’s pitching philosophy and how it is communicated to the players is about to get real noisy. Can’t wait!
Hey Samuel, is this very Cleveland Guardian like?
Samuel
Hey C Yards Jeff;
LOL
Actually, it’s very Houston Astros / Baltimore Orioles like.
Missing in the article and so far in all comments but yours, is the fact that the Orioles have multiple pitching coaches as well as analytic people that work with their pitchers (and position players as well).
In addition to the pitchers spotlighted: Perez and Baker; as well as 2 others mentioned: Bautista and Lopez – other unknown pitchers gotten on the cheap had nice years with the Orioles: Tate and Akin in relief along with starters: Bradish, Voth and Tyler Wells…who was moved from the bullpen to the starting rotation in 2022. All those pitchers got better as the year went on (although some were not used to pitching so many innings in a year and tailed off some in September) – especially when Adley Rutschman was promoted to the major leagues to become the O’s primarily Catcher. Probably just a coincidence (we need to talk about his offensive stats).
Now the interesting thing about “All-Star” closer Jorge Lopez was this: after he was traded to the Twins just before the deadline he’s didn’t do as well. In fact, in September he lost his closers’ role with the Twins. Humm. The O’s got 4 pitching prospects for him! Maybe in 2023 they’ll trade him back to the O’s for one of those prospects – the O’s should be able to straighten him out within a month. Fact is that Jorge is a very nice man (he and his wife are working through a sick child), and deserves the chance to again become a superior ML pitcher.
So I keep writing the same thing over and over (because I’m the dumbest guy in the room)…..
Teams cannot buy pitchers, they have to develop their own.
I love the Guardians organization and their young players. But feel that the O’s might be just a bit better. Either way, both organizations are about to teach a lot of those “rebuilding” teams that think signing established veterans at high salaries is necessary to succeed that it’s better to bring in quality FO people and coaches. Costs less – produces much more.
Then again, maybe those 2 teams just “got hot”.
LOL
RodBecksBurnerAccount
Just want to point out that Sam called the Phillies going to the World Series 5 months ago.
mlbtraderumors.com/2022/06/phillies-outright-scott…
Ra
Houston has bought pitchers, e.g. Verlander, Morton. A combination of developing Pitchers and signing free agents is probably the best route.
Also, I wouldn’t say the Orioles got Tate “on the cheap.”
Otherwise, nice post.
C Yards Jeff
So refreshing to see the FO level commitment to build success by developing within. Grateful that my Birds are a part of this movement/trend. Fun to follow.
Hey, sounds like you may have some positive mojo to pass my way in regards to Adley’s offensive production. Feel free to talk me off the ledge. LOL
BeansforJesus
We’ve seen this before with Sulser and Givens. Smart teams rarely trade for orioles BP pieces.
C Yards Jeff
MLB teams rarely trade for BP help regardless of the trade partner. Most glaring example of why so this past season, IMO, was Kimbral (sp?) from the White Sox to the Dodgers. Oof. Why the most glaring? Number of Dodger Blue fan negative rants posted on this site throughout the season about it.
Oh, per the article, looks like going waiver wire is a solid way to get this help.
BeansforJesus
I doubt that assertion. Teams trade for bullpen help all the time. i literally mentioned two in my comment above just from the orioles. Taylor Rogers, Josh Hader, Adam Ottavino, Aroldis Chapman, Raisel Iglesias, clay Holmes.
How did you come to that conclusion?
Ra
MLB teams eyeing playoff spots frequently trade to shore up their bullpen, e.g. Orioles and Andrew Miller., Cubs and Aroldis Chapman.
Ra
Castro? Britton? O’Day? Brach? All those acquiring teams are not “smart?”
Edp007
C’mon Os take Judge from the Yankees lol that would be some fun this off season hahaha
Thornton Mellon
Interesting discussion in the thread. Some points:
1. The Orioles have not been able to develop top-line SP from their organization since Mike Mussina, who performed for them. The number of SP’s who moved on and improved (Arrieta, Gausman, etc) told me something was rotten in the organization. Maybe that’s changed but haven’t seen it through fully yet.
2. Yes you can trade for SP help. For example, Rick Sutcliffe came over in 1992 and solidified the SP’s behind a blossoming Mussina and an above average Ben McDonald, suddenly the Orioles went from a morbid staff in 1991 to a pretty good one in 1992. Their mid 90s staff was Mussina and free agents, they made the playoffs twice before Ray Miller came in and had everyone underperform.
3. Rutschman’s first season reminds me of Machado. A ton of doubles, limited HR. Some of those doubles will turn into homers and I can see him hitting 25 HR in a full 2023 season. Average will come up, let’s say .270 or so this year. But its GREAT that he is patient! So many hackers on the team. While he has a high OBP he’s not a leadoff guy, but Ripken in his best years and Murray in most of his career were power hitting guys who walked a lot. Ken Singleton, another. The late 70s and early 80s Orioles offenses took a ton of walks and they were good because so many times those guys came around to score when someone did hit. Nothing wrong with patience! If they could actually GET a leadoff guy who can run AND get on base, that would be nice. Can’t have these sub .300 OBP guys batting leadoff.
4. Its nice that they have a decent bullpen but that’s much easier to get/change over than starters, either with home grown guys or trades. I count a good bullpen as a bonus. Its better to have a group of starters who can go 6 or 7 innings consistently with above average results.
Ra
Steve Adams, I appreciate your well-written article. Good insight and analysis. One thing that would have made your article even better would have been a mention of the impact that coach Ryan Klimek has had on strategy and pitch sequencing.