The Cardinals have released left-hander T.J. McFarland following last week’s DFA, as first indicated on their transactions log at MLB.com. He’s free to sign with any of the 29 other clubs and, so long as he’s in a new organization prior to Sept. 1, could be postseason-eligible with that new team.
Of course, the veteran McFarland would need to rediscover his 2021 form before even being considered for such a role with a new team. The 33-year-old was a rock-solid member of the Cardinals’ bullpen last year, racking up groundouts in droves (63.7%) while rarely issuing free passes (6.3%) or surrendering home runs (0.70 HR/9). Despite a paltry 14.6% strikeout rate, that blend of grounders and lack of walks/dingers resulted in a 2.56 ERA through 38 2/3 frames. Fielding-independent metrics weren’t as bullish but generally pegged the southpaw as a quality bullpen option (3.78 xERA, 3.79 FIP, 3.85 SIERA).
McFarland faced exactly one more batter with the Cardinals in 2022 (145) than he did in 2021 (144), but his return stint in St. Louis proved nightmarish in that near-identical sample. All of his rate stats trended in the wrong direction (11% strikeout rate, 7.6% walk rate, 53% grounder rate, 1.38 HR/9) — and so, too, did his results. In 32 2/3 innings, McFarland was rocked for a 6.61 ERA. Fewer strikeouts and grounders, paired with a considerable uptick in walks, long balls and general hard contact is hardly a recipe for success for any pitcher, after all.
That said, McFarland’s 88.9 mph average sinker in 2022 was pretty closely in line with his 89.2 mph average in 2021, and even his “diminished” walk and ground-ball rates are well better than the league average. The bottom-of-the-barrel strikeout rate is an obvious concern, but McFarland has never been one to miss bats (13.8% career strikeout rate) and nonetheless still carries a 4.13 ERA in 472 1/3 Major League frames.
If a new team can help McFarland get his sinker back on track and bump that grounder rate closer to the 63% mark he carried into the season, it’s possible he could get back on track and contribute some useful innings in the season’s final few weeks. The Cardinals are paying the remainder of this year’s $2.5MM salary regardless, so a new club would only need to pay McFarland the prorated league minimum for any time spent on the big league roster. At the very least, any contender looking for some lefty depth to stash in Triple-A could take a chance on stashing McFarland in the upper minors.
Eovaldismemes
LMFAOOOO WARDINALS
gatewaytothebest
Hopefully Gallegos is next!
dadofdonnydownvote
You wish. Gallegos is going no where anytime soon other than the St Louis Cardinals ball club.
tsolo85
And nor should he. He has some frustrating outings for sure, his pace is sometimes unbearable to watch. But he has above average stuff and honestly there isn’t a better RH option in their pen now besides Helsley. So if Gallegos is a problem it’s a depth issue more than anything.
Ol’ Uncle Charlie
It’s a depth issue AND the fact the guy just hasn’t delivered in high leverage situations this year.
Let’s too many guys on base and then is stuck throwing a get-me-over pitch to get crushed.
If the pen had more depth, he’d be moved, but we’re stuck with him for now. I’ll wager his role in high-leverage spots gets significantly reduced.
DonOsbourne
Pallante has been a better option. By far.
I have believed all season that Gallegos is hurt. That’s why trading Oviedo didn’t make sense.
Personally I would rather see Junior Fernandez come into a game than Gallegos. I also want to see Woodford get some opportunities.
I don’t think depth is as big of an issue as questionable, front office directed, usage of arms. We wasted too many innings (and wins) force feeding VerHagen, etc.
CravenMoorehead
He’s definitely worth a look despite having a solid year every several years.
TheOpener
Their loss.
Dotnet22
Literally.
TheREALMetsFan22
Come to the Mets. For a ring…
CravenMoorehead
glol
dadofdonnydownvote
I see you already have the Mets winning the World Series.
TheREALMetsFan22
Is that bad? Watch out this is the Cohen dynasty.
CravenMoorehead
I’m no Mets fan by any means, but I truly enjoyed watching those late 80s Mets party like barbarians all night and win games the next day. I’m shocked that they never won at least 3 WS with that talent.
angt222
Astros LHP for the pen?
TheREALMetsFan22
Since you’ll face the Mets in the WS I would. We hit RHP a lot better.
tstats
Omg he’s back lol
TheREALMetsFan22
Has to make a new account and everything. My old one didn’t let me post for some reason.
Devlsh
St. Louis may be in first place in the Central, but here’s a summary of John Mozeliak’s offseason “additions” to the ballclub:
Re-signed T J McFarland (6.61 ERA) – released
Signed Drew Verhagen (6.65 ERA) to a 2 year deal – IL
Signed Nick Wittgren (5.90 ERA) – released
Signed Steven Matz (5.70 ERA) to 4 year/$44M deal – IL
Signed Corey Dickerson (.231/.277/.361)
Signed Albert Pujols (who wanted to come back)
While I applaud his trade deadline additions, it can be argued the club would have a better record this season if he’d done nothing in the offseason at all.
GarryHarris
There’s a chance Matz will work out but the rest were bad signings from the beginning
Cardsfan21
Hate to say it but damn good point here. I’m hoping that after almost agreeing to give away the whole farm for Soto they will realize that they can get a star in the off-season and not have to. Not the Cardinals way but with our balance of vets and young talent, the immediate future looks really good. Now is a good time for an uncharacteristic free agent splash but not holding my breath.
Devlsh
Do you really trust Mozeliak to identify and sign a decent free agent?
Aside from the team’s forays into the Asian market (which includes Mikolas, Hyun-Kim, Seunghwan Oh, etc.), when’s the last time he signed a free agent that worked out? Dexter Fowler? Mike Leake? Brett Cecil? Luke Gregorson? Greg Holland? I think you have to go back nearly a decade to perhaps Johnny Peralta. And it’s worth noting Mo did his very best to sign David Price and Heyward who opted to sign elsewhere or we’d have more failures to list.
This organization drafts and develops very well. On occasion, they make worthwhile trades. But their history of identifying free agent talent (outside the Pacific Rim) isn’t good.
Ol’ Uncle Charlie
Even as a die-hard Cards fan, I can’t say Dev is wrong.
getoffmylawn
I’m not a Cardinals fan, so I don’t claim to know their roster/free agent track record well at all, but in fairness, I’d bet most teams track record in free agency is not very good. There’s often a reason why a player has gotten to free agency; generally, a team doesn’t want to extend him at the salary the player is demanding. This is usually because a player’s production doesn’t warrant the price; sometimes a player sees greener grass elsewhere, which often doesn’t work out because, again, whatever success the player has after signing a free-agent contract doesn’t merit the expense. As the saying goes, “buyer beware.”
Cardsfan21
Diehard as well and I hate how accurate he is
Dad
Nice lawn
stan lee the manly
Be careful what you wish for because Contreras is looking like a really good fit for the Cardinals next year lol
DonOsbourne
Pujols is doing his best to make up for the suckage of the other signings. I think Matz will work out long term. Long live El Hombre!
Cohn Joppolella
Mariners
rememberthecoop
Anyone else notice some issues with posting comments on the site lately? I’ve posted once yet it sometimes appears multiple times.
Devlsh
No, not at all.
Devlsh
No, not at all..
Devlsh
No, not at all…
12nv
No has had a lot of misses in free agency. He has swung big at some players and has been very lucky on the misses. His free agent signings have been bad also. They didn’t want to pay Lance Lynn. He would have been very helpful over the years. Stop shooting so big and get some pitching period!
Mopargary
Astros could use another reliever. Maton & Montero ain’t cutting it.
Putmeincoach12
Good luck