Kris Bryant looks to be close to returning to the Rockies lineup, as manager Bud Black told reporters (including MLB.com’s Thomas Harding) that Bryant will return to the team for an evaluation on Monday. If all goes well, Bryant could be activated from the injured list for tomorrow’s game against the Dodgers.
Bryant’s next appearance will be only his 18th game of the season, as the former NL MVP has twice been sidelined due to lower back strains. Bryant’s first IL stint cost him just shy of a month of action, and after being reinstated, he played in only two more games before returning to the injured list. All told, Bryant has made only 73 plate appearances and hit only .270/.342/.333 in his first season in a Rockies uniform.
Getting their prized free agent signing back onto the field is the first step in what the Rockies hope is a second-half turnaround. Today’s 6-3 loss to the Twins dropped Colorado’s record to 31-42, and the team sits in last place in the NL West.
While the Rockies’ ownership and front office has often been overly optimistic about the team’s chances, GM Bill Schmidt took a more measured tone in accessing his club’s play, telling The Denver Post’s Patrick Saunders and other reporters on Friday that the first goal was “just thinking about getting back to playing .500 baseball.” In regards to the trade deadline, Schmidt said “we will always listen” to offers from other teams, but the priority is still “to try to win as many games as we can.”
It’s difficult to tell whether or not Colorado’s record could have any real impact on their status as deadline sellers, considering that last year, the Rox opted to retain such pending free agents as Trevor Story and Jon Gray. If the Rockies are again prioritizing building around their core and not dealing players they think they can re-sign (i.e. how they re-signed C.J. Cron last fall), it could be another relatively quiet deadline for the team.
Case in point, Saunders feels the Rockies could try to extend closer Daniel Bard, since “they love his work ethic and his leadership and he’s become a second bullpen coach.” If a deal can’t be struck, however, it is possible Bard could be a candidate to be moved by August 2. Bard is enjoying a terrific season at the back of the Rockies’ bullpen, and is scheduled for free agency after the season, making him a tempting rental pick-up for any contender looking for relief help.
Given Bard’s unusual career path, he might be more open than most pending free agents to signing an extension. He went more than six full seasons between MLB appearances, as Bard struggled at both the big league and minor league levels, and he also stepped away from the sport entirely for two years. Bard’s comeback has now yielded three largely successful seasons with the Rockies, and Bard might welcome some long sought-after security in the form of a multi-year commitment to remain in Denver.
Schmidt seemed to downplay the idea of dealing any arms, saying that “I still say that our pitching is our strength, and it’s too hard for us to acquire pitching. So we still have the core that we are going to build around, going forward. That hasn’t changed.” This would seem to rule out the idea of the Rox dealing any starters, and maybe also relievers like Bard or (another scheduled free agent) Alex Colome, though Colome seems likelier to be moved than Bard.
Beyond the hurlers, Saunders figures that veteran infielder Jose Iglesias is the likeliest trade candidate, and that there isn’t much chance Charlie Blackmon would waive his no-trade protection to allow a deal. (Plus, the Rockies may not have the willingness or ability to deal Blackmon anyway.) Interestingly, Saunders suggests that the Rox should at least be open to the idea of moving Cron, even though the first baseman is still under contract for the 2023 season.
Dorothy_Mantooth
Unlikely to happen, but I’d love to see Daniel Bard come back to the Red Sox somehow. While Houck is doing well as their new closer, he’s more valuable in multi-inning relief appearances, so Boston should be looking for back end bullpen help at the trade deadline and obtaining Bard would be such a great story if he’s reacquired by Boston.
Dorothy_Mantooth
Red Sox wish list at the trade deadline:
1) Closer (Bard, Dave Robertson or Colome)
2) First Baseman (Josh Bell)
3) A contract extension for Raffy Devers
4) A healthy Chris Sale & Nate Eovaldi
AverageCommenter
I really don’t like Bard or Colome as accusations. They both seem like good candidates for the Red Sox to screw up. I definitely wouldn’t mind Robertson or Bell though.
Holy Cow!
Robertson probably wouldn’t cost the Red Sox too much, maybe someone in their top 15-20 prospect range.
padam
Accusations?
Samuel
While they started the year terribly fitting in new pieces, the Sox are 28-9 since May 19.
From most Sox fans comments here one would think they were fighting to stay out of the cellar.
Next weeks Sox-Yankees series is must see TV.
rememberthecoop
Can’t really argue with this post at all.
Ski to Coors
How about CJ Cron? Could put Cron at DH and move JD Martinez to OF. And that’s only IF Casas breaks out.
Although for Cron and Colome, Rockies should be asking for Brayan Bello in return. Around 30-35M surplus value in Cron and Colome, which equates to a 55 FV pitcher.
Eaglefeather
Scott Barlow of KC might be available and would be a nice fit for my Rays.
RSOX…you can have Colome!
Cincyfan85
Fans: We want all teams to try and compete!
Middling team tries to compete.
Fans: They’re delusional trying to compete.
hiflew
I LOVE that my Rockies have never really tanked. Yeah they have been bad, but it’s not as bad for a fan if they are just naturally bad instead of being bad on purpose. It’s cliche, but at least they try.
My biggest issue is that the Rockies tend to only go halfway. They go for a big ticket FA like Bryant, but then just cobble together the rest. Their farm is not that strong, but they don’t use the prospects they have either on the big league team or as currency to get better at the big league level. They opt for the middle road of shuttling guys between AAA and the big league bench. Randal Grichuk should not be anyone’s answer for struggling offense. They need to either use their prospects to trade for better vets or just let the kids play and hope you catch lightning in a bottle.
It is frustrating as a fan, but I still bleed purple forever.
Dock_Elvis
They usually have to rely in being middle of the road because ownership hasn’t committed to player development for the time it takes to develope it at elevation. They kind of do both things. But you’re happy, and I think that explains a little of a Kris Bryant type signing.
I really don’t understand holding Story. He was clearly gone.
brod21
Was the potential rental return on Story from someone worth more than the 31st pick in this draft is ultimately what it will come down to. Likely would have got a collection of a few lower tier prospects that might have some potential but they likely wouldn’t have gotten back anyone with a ceiling higher than whoever this pick will be
hiflew
I have no problem not trading Story. Prices were not good at all at the deadline last year. Gray is more of a puzzler, although management was convinced they would be able to re-sign him and they figured if they traded him their odds would be worse.
Ski to Coors
Rockies felt like the offers they had for Story were not better than who they could draft with the pick acquired.
CleaverGreene
I like your attitude, but Bryant was not the guy to sign long term. The handwriting was all over that wall.
hiflew
I agree 100%. And for me it has nothing to do with his injury possibilities or the potential for future breakdown of his game. For me, I just don’t like the guy. He was the face of a Cubs team that I hated. I am a Rockies fan, but my 86 year old grandfather is a Reds fan and I live in local Reds territory, so I watch quite a few Reds games. I spent the last seven years watching Bryant as an enemy. Probably one of my least fave players in the game. And NOW I am supposed to like him just because someone gave him a lot of money to wear my team’s jersey? I don’t think so. I am still a hardcore Rockies fan, but I want one of two things to happen. Bryant to flop OR Bryant to get super hot so that someone else may want him in a trade. Hopefully the latter, but I doubt it.
Cmurphy
See, I don’t get that. I love baseball and sure there are teams I dislike and not-so-subtlety root to lose, but I don’t hate a player because they’re on the team.
FossSellsKeys
For the most part. But for me, anybody who was a Yankee or a White Sux is FOREVER UNCLEAN in my book. I can never support them again. So I get it.
hiflew
I didn’t hate him because he was on the Cubs. But it didn’t help matters. I just didn’t like his smug looks and attitude in general..
JoeBrady
hiflew
I LOVE that my Rockies have never really tanked….. My biggest issue is that the Rockies tend to only go halfway.
====================================
The issue there is that the “never tanked” and “only going halfway” are the same thing. If a mid-market team never tanks, then they are likely to never go all-in. In order to go all-in, and take a shot at the WS, you need to tank occasionally and amass a war chest of prospects and free cash flow.
IRT “never tanking”, they are, just not active, forward-looking tanking like they should. They’re like the Orioles. Instead of doing a pro-active tank, where you get prospects for vets, they just allow the vets to walk.
Over the past 12 years, they finished 4th or 5th 9x. That’s as close to tanking as possible.
FossSellsKeys
They definitely aren’t tanking. They’ve run high payrolls and spent major dollars on free agents and extensions that whole time. They’re really trying to win games, they just have no idea how to do that. Finishing 4th or 5th has nothing to do with tanking, tanking is doing that on purpose to get draft picks and avoiding spending to clear payroll. The Rox have done the opposite, they’ve just been bad anyway. The effort is there, the belief is there, they just don’t have a smart organization.
Ski to Coors
Giving Ian Desmond playing time wasn’t tanking? How about signing Daniel Murphy instead of resigning DJ Lemahieu? Guess that was just being a really dumb organization.
FossSellsKeys
Giving Desmond and Murphy playing time wasn’t tanking. Tanking would be playing any random AAA dude in those spots for league minimum. They paid over $10m annually to play each of those guys! That’s just zero understanding of how to build a roster. They aren’t cheap, they’re just like kids trying to run a professional baseball team.
hiflew
A lot of Rockies fans always thought DJ was overrated and according to stats was due to regress at any time. So it was better to get rid of him before his decline. Naturally, picking up a 47 year old Daniel Murphy was much better.
DJ was one of my favorite Rockies of all time. It was just a bad move by the team. But every team has bad moves like that. It’s not just a Rockies thing.
hiflew
Exactly. Tanking is trading away everyone that makes any kind of money and basically putting your entire AAA roster in the majors. Just like the Astros did in 2010. They traded away everyone with a pulse. The Rockies are the exact opposite of tanking. The keep everyone past their expiration dates out of misplaced loyalty.
CleaverGreene
LOL they all want that WS caliber team or bust. Delusional, just root for your team to be playoff contenders.; there’s nothing wrong with that.
JoeBrady
You could see this coming from a mile away. The only left to do is to trade him to the RS and throw in $52M.