Even before general manager David Forst kicked off the offseason by acknowledging a need to listen to trade offers on his core players, a large-scale teardown wasn’t hard to see coming. The A’s spent the bulk of the winter in trade talks that resulted in four fan favorites being dealt for prospects, and the lack of subsequent moves to reallocate the money they saved further underscores that this is a team looking at 2023 and beyond.
Major League Signings
- Jed Lowrie, 2B: One year, $850K
- Stephen Vogt, C: One year, $850K
- Total spend: $1.7MM
Option Decisions
- Declined $4MM club option on LHP Jake Diekman (paid $750K buyout)
- LHP Andrew Chafin declined $5.25MM mutual option (received $500K buyout)
Trades and Claims
- Traded 1B Matt Olson to the Braves for CF Cristian Pache, C Shea Langeliers, RHP Ryan Cusick, LHP Joey Estes
- Traded 3B Matt Chapman to the Blue Jays for RHP Gunnar Hoglund, SS/3B Kevin Smith, LHP Zach Logue, LHP Kirby Snead
- Traded RHP Chris Bassitt to the Mets for RHPs JT Ginn and Adam Oller
- Traded LHP Sean Manaea to the Padres for INF Euribiel Angeles and RHP Adrian Martinez
- Acquired RHP Brent Honeywell Jr. from the Rays in exchange for cash
- Claimed INF Sheldon Neuse off waivers from the Dodgers
- Claimed LHP Sam Selman off waivers from the Angels (since outrighted to Triple-A)
Extensions
None
Notable Minor League Signings
- Ryan Castellani, Dany Jimenez, Eric Thames, Justin Grimm, Christian Bethancourt, Billy McKinney, Austin Pruitt, Parker Markel
Notable Losses
- Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Chris Bassitt, Sean Manaea, Starling Marte, Mark Canha, Yusmeiro Petit, Sergio Romo, Josh Harrison, Yan Gomes, Mitch Moreland, Mike Fiers, Trevor Rosenthal, Khris Davis, Burch Smith
The “Notable Losses” section of the introduction to this review would be a better foundation for a roster than several teams throughout the league currently have — Oakland among them. Heading into the offseason, the A’s had the option of paying their core arbitration class a projected $53.7MM, adding that to the guaranteed salaries of Elvis Andrus ($7.75MM, when including cash received from the Rangers) and Stephen Piscotty ($7.25MM) and then rounding out the roster with pre-arb players and whatever offseason additions they might’ve seen fit to add.
Surrounding the group of Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Sean Manaea, Chris Bassitt, Frankie Montas, Ramon Laureano, Tony Kemp, Lou Trivino, Chad Pinder, Deolis Guerra, Andrus and Piscotty with pre-arbitration players would’ve left the A’s with a payroll in the $80-85MM range — a stone’s throw from 2019’s franchise-record Opening Day mark of $92.2MM. A’s ownership instead opted to tear it down and let longtime manager Bob Melvin depart for a three-year deal to manage the Padres.
From a big-picture standpoint, it’s easy enough to take each transaction in isolation and more or less see the merit behind it. Nine of the Athletics’ top 30 prospects at MLB.com came over by way of this quartet of trades, including half of their top ten. It’s a similar story at Baseball America and FanGraphs. Oakland’s farm system was generally bereft of high-end talent, save for a few names, and while no one is going to suddenly crown them the best minor league system in MLB, their farm is unequivocally improved. For a team that typically operates with notable payroll constraints, a deep farm is vital.
On the other hand, this is an A’s team that has gone 313-233 over the past four seasons — a .573 winning percentage that has kept them squarely in contention. The loss of Starling Marte and Mark Canha in free agency would’ve stung and left Oakland with some work to do in the outfield, particularly with Ramon Laureano suspended for the first month of the season. However, the infield, catching corps and rotation would’ve all been in fine shape. The bullpen and outfield, the two areas that would’ve needed the most attention, are typically deep in relative bargain options, and that was true this winter as well.
What’s done is done, however, and the A’s opted for the long-term approach. The trade of Olson brought Oakland a near-MLB-ready outfielder in Cristian Pache, who was given the nod as the team’s Opening Day center fielder. Pache and touted catching prospect Shea Langeliers could both be regulars in the Oakland lineup in the near future — depending on what happens with current catcher Sean Murphy — whereas pitchers Ryan Cusick and Joey Estes add a pair of interesting arms to the lower levels of the system. Cusick, in particular, is of interest given that he was Atlanta’s top draft pick just last summer.
He’s not the only 2021 first-rounder acquired by the A’s, though, as righty Gunnar Hoglund headlined the return for Chapman. Hoglund might’ve been a top-10 pick and the second college arm off the board had he not undergone Tommy John surgery during his junior season at Ole Miss. The Jays were happy to scoop him up with the No. 19 pick, and the A’s are surely all the more pleased to add him to their system. Like Cusick and Estes, he’s a ways from big league readiness, but that’s not true of the rest of Oakland’s return. Infielder Kevin Smith broke camp as their Opening Day third baseman, while lefty Kirby Snead is in the big league bullpen. Fellow southpaw Zach Logue received the call to the big leagues just today, and while he profiles mostly as a back-of-the-rotation arm, there’d be plenty of value in securing six years of a fourth starter if he indeed realizes that potential.
Likewise, the Bassitt trade has already produced one big leaguer in the form of righty Adam Oller. He’s not as highly regarded as fellow righty JT Ginn, also acquired from the Mets in that Bassitt swap, but he’ll give the club a rotation candidate to evaluate in 2022 and beyond. Ginn, meanwhile, is now ranked as the A’s top pitching prospect (fourth in the organization overall) at Baseball America.
Following the trades of Bassitt, Olson and Chapman — each of which happened in fairly rapid succession — all eyes turned to Manaea and Montas. As a one-year rental, Manaea felt particularly likely to be moved, but the broader focus was on Montas. The hard-throwing righty had just wrapped a career-year in 2021 and, following a declaration from Reds GM Nick Krall that neither Luis Castillo nor Tyler Mahle was expected to be traded, Montas became the undisputed prize of the pitching trade market. He drew interest from virtually every team in need of rotation help, with the Twins, White Sox, Yankees, Royals and several others connected.
Just as it started to appear the A’s would carry both Montas and Manaea to begin the season, however, Oakland struck an agreement to send Manaea to San Diego. In return, they received what many considered a surprisingly light package, landing infield prospect Euribiel Angeles and righty Adrian Martinez. Angeles posted a big .330/.392/.445 line as a 19-year-old against much older competition at two Class-A levels in 2021, and he’s out to a strong start with the A’s High-A club thus far. He’s regarded as the higher-ceiling name of the two, but Martinez posted huge numbers in Double-A last year and has now reached Triple-A. He has a good chance at cracking the Majors this season and, like Logue, could give the A’s a rotation option to consider as soon as this summer.
Suffice it to say, the A’s have considerably bolstered their farm system, though they’ve done so at the cost of any realistic shot of competing in 2022 (and perhaps in 2023 as well). They’ve also set the stage for further trades in the near future. Montas will again be one of the most in-demand names on the market this summer, health permitting, and the A’s will also have center fielder Ramon Laureano, right-hander Lou Trivino and others to peddle as contending clubs look for upgrades.
One name of particular intrigue is young catcher Sean Murphy, who swatted 17 home runs and won a Gold Glove last year — the first of what could be multiple Gold Gloves for the defensive standout. Murphy is controlled three years beyond the current season, but there was at least speculation he could be in play this past winter. With Oakland acquiring Langeliers, who possesses a similar skill set to Murphy but is younger and could be controlled at least six seasons, it’s fair to wonder whether parting with Murphy will now be easier. Add in that Murphy will reach arbitration eligibility next winter and that the Athletics’ top overall prospect is 20-year-old catcher Tyler Soderstrom (the No. 26 pick in 2020) — and it’s all the more feasible that executive vice president Billy Beane and Forst contemplate dealing from their surplus. There’s no urgency to move Murphy, of course, but his name will likely surface at this year’s deadline and, if he’s not moved then, in the offseason.
Beyond that veritable landslide of prospects and young big leaguers, the A’s didn’t do much of anything to strengthen the 2022 roster. The lack of any real spending further solidifies both the fact that this is viewed as a rebuilding year and that payroll concerns were a driving factor behind the trades of Olson, Chapman, Bassitt and Manaea.
That was also true with regards to the departure of Melvin, who had managed the club for ten-plus seasons. The veteran skipper was under contract for 2022, but the A’s allowed him to pursue the San Diego opportunity — reportedly at least partially due to concerns about the $4MM salary he’d been set to receive. Once Melvin departed, Oakland hired third base coach Mark Kotsay as skipper. Kotsay, who signed a three-year deal but whose salary is unreported, gets his first crack at managing after six years on Melvin’s staffs. He’s overseeing a young roster, one that wasn’t much fortified after many of the top players were dealt away.
The only two Major League contracts given out by the A’s were a pair of deals for old friends and fan favorites Jed Lowrie and Stephen Vogt. Lowrie provided league-average offense and poor defense at second base last year, but he’s been a DH and played the corners in his only four games thus far. Vogt hit poorly in 2020-21 with the D-backs and Braves, but he’ll give the team a backup catcher and the fans an old cult favorite to root on in what’ll likely be a lean season.
Perhaps in the end, the Athletics’ latest bevy of trades will ultimately yield a group that turns into their next core. It’s arguable this was a necessary course of action, given the team’s mounting arbitration class, but that’s only the case if fans accept that ownership can’t field a payroll even in the $80-90MM range, which ought to be a tough sell for fans considering all 30 clubs are now receiving upwards of $65MM annually in national television and streaming revenue alone. (That sum does not include local television deals, gate revenue, etc.) As Forst said at the onset of the offseason, “this is our lot in Oakland until it isn’t” — and it seems ownership is pretty content to maintain the status quo.
The A’s can push the company line these trades are necessary for them to compete, but it has long been apparent many of the players who drove their recent run of success would be moved to cut costs. Back in November, USA Today’s Bob Nightengale reported ownership desired a payroll of $50MM. After making the Manaea deal just four days before Opening Day, the team reached that level. Cot’s Contracts pegs the Athletics’ payroll at $47,953,333. Roster Resource estimates that it’s $49,866,025. According to Cot’s, it’s the second-lowest mark in MLB, ahead of only the Orioles. With that cheaper roster will almost certainly come a worse on-field product than A’s fans have enjoyed of late.
taito2000
We’ll see what kind of season the A’s end up having…
48-team MLB
*SACRAMENTO SQUIRRELS
passed_balls
Dude shut up already. Clown
raisinsss
I mean why even bother with Andrus and Piscotty at this point?
Just roll with a AA team (and I mean that in a positive way relative to AAA) and a couple REALLY low cost vet clubhouse guys (Pillar was around…)and see who sticks.
raisinsss
Responding to myself: I guess they are both negative value players. Maybe they can include someone to offset? IDK.
Must be weird to be an A’s fan.
lgofromny
Dear John Fisher: Compete to win, or sell the fng team. Every single fan wants you gone.
CubsWin108
What makes you think they can compete? they LOST last year, even though Fisher gave the go to buy, and they did buy, getting alot of pieces, they still failed to make the playoffs. This is the A’s way, they simply cannot compete so the best thing to do is blow it up, they’ll be back in 3 years, they had a shot these last 4 years, they failed. Time to rebuild, samething has happened with all last A’s teams. Consider yourselves lucky with the amount of playoffs you guys have gotten into, the Mariners haven’t even made the playoffs in two decades.
ChapmansVacuum
Really? One 11M reliever that was a bad signing to make up for not signing Hendricks long term is spending big? With a payroll of like 80M bottom 5 in the league.
If the team had kept Semien and Hendricks they could have signed one or two other pieces with a still bottom 10 payroll at like 110M and kept a 97 win team together.
John Fisher is a gianormous knob who wouldnt even pay minor leaguers during a pandemic shutdown until he was forced. Dude is one of the richer owners in MLB about to make a huge killing redeveloping the current 120 acre colosseum property if they do move, but has been the cheapest owner in the sport forever. They have a TV opt out for a new deal after next season and yet tanked the product hurting a major market deal that would have paid easily enough for a 120M payroll.
CubsWin108
Yea, I can understand why they let Hendricks go, they’re one of the best teams in Baseball when it comes to finding good pitching, and finding good bullpen pieces are so easy if your smart about it. But that Semien move was so stupid, they basically traded for what would’ve been his salary on a one year deal, for two years of Elvis Andres, they could’ve traded Semien if they had too for more controllable prices. Even though John Fisher might be rich, that does not mean his Baseball budget is rich, no owner in sports is willing to LOSE gobs of money, except for maybe a few. So the amount of money he has in his bank account does not matter.
CubsWin108
Also maybe they could compete if ya’ll starting showing up for games, instead you all just compain from Home, even when the team is good!
ARC 2
@cubswin108 One thing A’s fans are complaining about is the team raised up ticket prices up a ,lot while cutting payroll more than 50%. So they want you to pay more for tickets while spending barely nothing on the team. Like buying a pizza for more money and only getting 1/3 of the whole pie.
CubsWin108
Well when the ticket prices were lower, and the team was better. Nobody showed up, so they have to raise prices to be able to make a budget
Mitchell Page
Dopey A’s fans like to continually say Let’s Go Oakland , and I would like to get this ship going towards Las Vegas , and leave these dopes behind .
Steinbrenner2728
Unfortunately, they’re not moving to Vegas whether you like it or not. They wouldnt risk moving to the lowest-ever TV market for a prospective MLB team. Now I get the Casual fan’s perspective of Las Vegas being all about glitz and glam, but the Raiders benefit mostly from Southern California fans, and VGK is a hockey team that in any city, could always pack a 18,000-seat arena. But MLB is different: Why hasn’t there been a relocation since 2004? Baseball’s CBA and market prioritization is different from other leagues. All 30 teams can care two flying F’s less if they don’t fill out seats at their ballparks, as long as their fans are watching on TV, more often than not, that said Baseball team can just swim in the money, cry poor, brag about spending, and not deal or think about moving to another city, let alone another market.
Asfan0780
Vegas isn’t all glitz and glam. Once you get off the strip it’s outdoor strip malls every block it seems and suburban type residential areas. Family has a house there, they visit every several months, personally, I wouldn’t want to stay in Vegas for more than a week, plus the weather is brutal once spring and summer months
ChapmansVacuum
The Raiders benefit from a 8 home game season as far as live turnout, and the fact that media market size doesnt matter when the NFL league office handles all the TV deals and its one deal for the whole league instead of each team doing its own.
missing the moustaches
And those 8 games have a large contingent of visiting fans filling out the seats. You can do that if there are only 8 games once a week, quite a different story with 81 games with 5-7 a week.
passed_balls
They’re not moving. So might as well keep rooting for the Gigantes, homer.
diddlez
It absolutely boggles my mind every time this team pretends like they don’t have any money.
ChapmansVacuum
They lie a lot!
raisinsss
The Oakland A’s are like when you ask Santa for a Super Nintendo but you’re really poor and end up with a $19.99 LCD handheld of Afterburner 2.
Batteries not included.
BeansforJesus
But at least you’re never disappointed because you never got your hopes up.
You Can Put It In The Books
Lol that’s oddly specific
Asfan0780
For nostalgia, I bought the snes classic when it came out. Never opened it, since I can play emulators on a raspberry pi. Since Nintendo products hold value maybe it’ll be worth something. I still have an unopened GameCube platinum from 2007, but haven’t checked its current value
jbigz12
Every time a team won’t spend they get bashed but they weren’t going to push the payroll up to 120MM or so & that’s realistically what it would’ve taken to get this team to look like a playoff contender.
You were losing Marte, Chafin, Canha, & part of Laureano’s season off of a team that already didn’t make it last year. You needed a SS, at least 2 outfielders, and a DH. Then you had to put together an entire bullpen. You had to do this via spending because the Oakland farm was pretty damn bare.
I think they made the right call considering.
Cap & Crunch
I do too
Maybe not on the confidence level of Bush Sr putting on the green Bomber and claiming Mission accomplished but essentially mission accomplished here for the A’s
They have many potential future dilemmas to ponder that are unsettled at the moment (location, ownership, fan base ect ect) Almost all of them are better set with a stronger farm and wide open ledger.
The A’s have time and time shown us they will be back, and quicker than even the optimistic folks seem to think
jbigz12
Right. If the A’s would’ve had the farm they have right now—-and tore it down. I’d be right there waiving the cheap & disgusted flag with Steve. But that’s not reality. Their farm was garbage and patching that many holes in free agency is ineffective and extremely expensive.
They did what was necessary. It’d be nice to see if they could start locking guys up like Cleveland is doing now w/ their next core.
Prunella Vulgaris
It was W who claimed mission accomplished.
JoeBrady
They did what they had to do.
Highest IQ
Notable losses: The entire core.
Asfan0780
I didn’t think they got enough for manaea, bassitt. Yes they had 1 yr left only but getting pitchers in oller and Martinez who are age 25 and 27. Maybe they view them as mlb ready but we’ll see
CubsWin108
The A’s got who they wanted, I’m sure of it. They arn’t the type of team to get swindled by Preller…
HalosHeavenJJ
The split of the national tv contracts was $60.1 million per team. Each team then put in 48% of local revenues and took out an equal 3.3% from that pot.
Fisher netted about $110 million between the two. He’s rolling out a payroll of less than $40 million.
This was a good core. Better than all but the Astros in the West. He could have tried to add to it and compete. He chose to pocket other teams money.
Once again the biggest problem with the CBA is the lack of a “use it or lose it” clause for these funds.
Any year Oakland comes close to doing so they are a good club.
missing the moustaches
I was hoping there would be a floor established in the new CBA but sadly there was not. Completely agree that every owner should be spending up to the TV money they receive. My guess is that if Fisher had to spend $110 million per year minimum he would look to sell the team.