With Trevor Story set to decline the qualifying offer in search of a multi-year contract elsewhere, the Rockies enter the offseason with a question mark at shortstop for the first time in years. Among the options under consideration: moving third baseman Ryan McMahon up the defensive spectrum to short, reports Patrick Saunders of the Denver Post.
“(Moving McMahon) is something we have discussed,” Colorado general manager Bill Schmidt told Saunders. “Ryan has good range and that’s something we saw last year when he played third base with the shift on.” While McMahon told Saunders he’d yet to hear anything from the organization about that possibility, he sounded amenable to the idea. “I’d like to think that I could work at any (position) and become at least a solid defender there,” the 26-year-old said.
Kicking McMahon over to shortstop on a regular basis would be quite the risk. Not only has he never started a game there in the major leagues, he’s logged all of three innings at the position in his professional career. The California native moved from shortstop to third base in high school, and he’s bounced between the hot corner, second base and first base as a pro.
As Schmidt suggested, though, McMahon’s coming off an excellent defensive season at multiple spots on the diamond. Defensive Runs Saved estimated he was twelve runs above average over 848 2/3 innings at third base (a position at which he was a Gold Glove finalist) and pegged him as an incredible nine runs better than average in just 368 1/3 frames at second base. Statcast credited him with twelve Outs Above Average between the two positions, a mark that tied for tenth among infielders league-wide.
Were the Rockies to address the position internally, it seems McMahon is likelier to shoulder it than Brendan Rodgers. While Rodgers came up as a shortstop prospect, he’s spent the bulk of his time at second base in recent seasons. That was primarily in deference to Story, but Schmidt reiterated when speaking with Saunders that the club would prefer to keep Rodgers at the keystone.
Of course, the Rox aren’t foreclosing the possibility of addressing shortstop from outside the organization. Schmidt told Saunders the front office is exploring the free agent market. A full-fledged pursuit at one of the market’s top shortstops seems unlikely, but the club could pursue a shorter-term agreement with a player like Andrelton Simmons or Freddy Galvis to at least stabilize the defense.
While a run at one of the top shortstops probably won’t be in the cards, the Rockies have been expected to target a power-hitting outfielder over the coming months. Schmidt confirmed when speaking with Nick Groke of the Athletic the front office sees an addition in the grass as the “best place” for a meaningful upgrade to the lineup. Kyle Schwarber, Chris Taylor, Avisaíl García, Jorge Soler and Michael Conforto are among a fairly strong group of free agent outfielders available.
Signing Taylor or Conforto — both of whom rejected qualifying offers from their previous clubs — would cost the Rockies their third-highest pick in the 2022 draft. With the Rockies facing an uphill battle to compete in a loaded NL West next year, there’s a case that Colorado should prioritize future draft considerations over nearer-term adds.
Schmidt isn’t ruling out a run at a qualified free agent, though, telling Groke he’d be open to surrendering draft compensation in the right scenario. “You have to take it case by case and explore your options,” the veteran executive said. “You can’t blanket say, ‘There’s a draft pick compensation, we’re out.’ You have to consider who the player is, what the acquisition cost is, and what are your alternatives.”
Schmidt’s win-now attitude is the latest reaffirmation that Colorado brass doesn’t view themselves being far from contention. It’s unsurprising given that stance that the Rockies aren’t expected to trade staff ace Germán Márquez this offseason, writes Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic. While Colorado could surely bring back a massive haul for a talented, controllable rotation building block like Márquez, they seemingly gave very little consideration to moving the 26-year-old at this past summer’s trade deadline. Instead, it seems the right-hander will be back for his third consecutive Opening Day start in purple and black.
tiltedgambler
lol thinking they’re anywhere near contention in that division. doesn’t matter who is in the front office..they’re all fully tone deaf and randomly clicking buttons
Dustyslambchops23
There is just one thought I have after reading this and it can be summed up well by a comment from misterlol
emac22
I think you pretty much define quitter when you give up in November.
You might be able to get fans to buy into constant rebuilds in sports where draft picks actually go to the team that drafts them but you can’t run a business and just give up before you start because it’s hard or even because it’s almost impossible.
“Tone deaf” is thinking you can just sit there and wait for your competition to be weak before trying.
Justin Bobko
This is completely absurd
cleribe
At some point, someone has to be willing to have them all committed. It is absolutely delusional to “press on”. They should tear it down now, while the big 3 fight it out, and try again when there is an actual opportunity for them.
hennigplex
Yay, continue to hang on to assets until they either aren’t an asset anymore or they walk for nothing in free agency. Top of the line sound GM’s at work there. Not to worry though for us Rockies fans, there has to be another Ian Desmond out there waiting to be had! I smell contention already
MVPNacho
Hey, Ian Desmond used to play Shortstop
realistnotsucker
Any relation to Vincent Kennedy?
Mystery Team
Well they don’t need all that much starting pitching, Marquez, Gomber, Freeland, and Senzatela are a pretty solid four if healthy. You can have Trevor Story his home and away splits tell the real story there. He can be replaced much easier than some think. Some poor team is gonna get fleeced signing him to a huge contract. Obviously this team isn’t going to win a title but they have to try to sell the fans that contention isn’t that far off or they won’t come out. I really like McMahon and I like some of their prospects, Veen is a stud and Romo is a very good catcher with a little life in his bat. Where they play is always gonna be an issue for their pitching but the same goes for their opposition. All I’m saying is that the Braves just won the title with a roster that didn’t jump off the page at you so you never know. Hey if Atlanta was at full strength with all the guys they lost then it’s a different story but they weren’t. Get to the tournament and anything can happen.
averagejoe15
2021 and people still think large home-road splits for Rockies players are meaningful.
emac22
The idea that losing out on expensive free agents somehow hurts mid or small market teams is sort of funny.
Not trading Story was a front office failure.
The money he would have earned in that free agency contract alone should impact the team far more than Story would have but adding a return from a trade, even just lottery ticket type players, would be gravy and could be significant.
Titles are great but so is baseball if you have a good team with a bright future. Focusing on that future while giving yourself a small chance of getting lucky every year should be all you need.
MVPNacho
What about Hampson at Shortstop? I know he has played there and was blocked by Story. Not sure if he’s good enough to take over, never really saw him field that position.
Samuel
Said it before, will say it again…….
When MLB began talking expansion in 1958-59, Denver was considered for a franchise. But due to the thin air it was dismissed as a candidate. MLB didn’t need advanced statistics to know what had happened for decades with the Bears AAA team. Scouts and personnel people routinely dismissed what pitchers and hitters did playing in Denver (batted balls carry, breaking pitches don’t break much) – including the visiting teams. They knew it wouldn’t play in the other MLB ballparks.
Congresspeople from Florida and Colorado put the screws to MLB to expand into those areas – threatening to pass laws to repeal the monopoly that MLB has. So franchises were given to 2 cities in Florida that cannot support either of their teams even when they’re winning, and Denver. No one can gage player production in the Colorado mountain area (possibly the most beautiful state in the USA).
So jump on the FO people and the owner to your hearts content. But you can put the most generous owner and the best FO in MLB to run that franchise, and the results will pretty much be the same.
to4
That’s stupid. Don’t they have Rodgers and Hampson as MINF ?
Keep Mc at 3B, Hampson at 2B and Rodgers at SS or Hampson at SS and Rodgers at 2B. Whom ever defends better between those 2 takes SS !
DanielDannyDano
Put McMahon where his defensive brilliance has the greatest impact-middle of the defense at second.