As the Cubs (and most other teams around the game) shift their focus to the offseason, president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer told reporters this week that improving and deepening his pitching staff will be his “No. 1 priority” this winter (links via Russell Dorsey of the Chicago Sun-Times and Gordon Wittenmyer of NBC Sports Chicago). That said, Hoyer also preached the importance of utilizing the team’s considerable financial flexibility “in an intelligent way” and pointed to Rays and Giants as examples of teams who made under-the-radar moves to bring themselves into the postseason.
As one would expect, Hoyer didn’t expressly rule out the addition of any marquee free agents. However, he also pushed back against the notion of “winning” the offseason — noting that such aggressive pushes can often “be a real negative” — and instead spoke of acting in a more “opportunistic” manner. While pitching may be the primary focus of the Cubs’ offseason dealings, then, it doesn’t sound as though Hoyer is embarking on an all-out pursuit for top-of-the-market additions.
That the Cubs would prioritize pitching — particularly starting pitching — is to be expected after their starters were among the worst in baseball in nearly every category in 2021. Last offseason saw Hoyer & Co. downgrade from Yu Darvish to Zach Davies in salary-dump deal with the Padres, following that up with one-year signings of Trevor Williams and Jake Arrieta. Davies didn’t pitch well enough to garner trade interest at the deadline. Arrieta was eventually released. Williams went to the Mets alongside Javier Baez. None of the three will be back in 2022 (unless the club re-signs Davies).
The result was a rotation that ranked 23rd in the Majors in innings pitched (781 2/3), 27th in ERA (5.27), 29th in FIP (5.21) and tied for 28th in SIERA (4.74). Cubs starters had the third-lowest strikeout rate of any team in MLB and the eighth-highest walk rate — a decidedly suboptimal combination. Things were better in the bullpen, although not overwhelmingly so, and the deadline trades of Craig Kimbrel, Ryan Tepera and Andrew Chafin leave plenty of work to be done on the relief side of the equation as well.
Looking to the 2022 campaign, the Cubs’ rotation currently projects to include right-handers Kyle Hendricks, Alec Mills and Adbert Alzolay. Lefty Justin Steele struggled for much of his nine-start audition down the stretch, but he closed out the year on a high note with seven shutout frames (albeit against a thin Pirates lineup). Right-hander Adrian Sampson has minor league options remaining and could get a look after making five starts. Broadly speaking, there’s ample room to add to the rotation — even if the Cubs indeed sit out the market for Robbie Ray, Kevin Gausman, Max Scherzer and other top starters.
The looming offseason will present Major League teams with a deep collection of free-agent starting pitchers to pursue — even beyond the aforementioned top names. The market also features established mid-rotation arms, relatively young arms in need of a bounceback, and solid but older veterans who’ll likely command relatively short-term deals. Free agency will be clouded by the ongoing collective bargaining talks between the league and the MLBPA, but whenever teams do begin to make additions, the Cubs will have no shortage of options.
It’s also plenty plausible that the Cubs could further dip into the trade market to acquire some younger arms in either the rotation or the ’pen. Willson Contreras is a year from free agency and ought to again command interest from teams in search of a short-term option behind the plate. Outfielder Ian Happ only has two years of club control remaining and closed out the season with a huge second half. Hendricks struggled through the worst season of his career in 2021 but from 2017-20 tossed 597 innings of 3.27 ERA ball. He’s signed through 2023.
Whatever route the Cubs wish to take, there’s really no target who should be out of their price range. The team has one of the game’s deepest revenue streams and only has the contracts of Hendricks ($14MM), Jason Heyward ($22MM) and David Bote ($2.5MM) on next year’s books. Contreras and Happ are the only players set to receive notable arbitration raises, and again, neither should be viewed as a lock to return. We’re only two years removed from the Cubs trotting out an Opening Day payroll north of $200MM, meaning it’d be a tough sell to the fans to both trade away the core of the last championship roster and follow it up with another offseason punctuated by modest one-year deals.
Hoyer has emphasized on multiple occasions that despite the Cubs’ recent trades and lack of spending, this reshaping of the roster won’t mirror the aggressive tanking process of their last rebuild. The extent to which that is or is not actually the case will start to become clear over the next several months.
STLBirds86
Man that Heyward deal… ♂️ Glad the Cards didn’t do that.
Randomuser4567
You mean that Heyward didn’t? The cards tried.
The Mets "Missed WAR"
I’m just glad the Braves traded him to the Cards for Shelby Miller and then flipped Miller for Swanson. I cringed when the Cubs gave that offer to Heyward. Braves fans knew all to well he was going to be a disappointment. He has a degenerative back injury from highschool and would constantly have nagging problems and go through slumps because of it. I can’t believe how much some people believed in him after that 1 career year in St. Louis. He wasn’t even THAT good. He didn’t hit .300. He didn’t hit 30 home runs. He didn’t even steal 30 bases. People loved his defense but he wasn’t even really good enough to play center field. I feel like his WAR that year was way too overrated. There’s no way he alone won an additional 7 games for the Cardinals that season.
mike127
Birds86—-man, you are a quick healer…..Cubs fans certainly appreciate your consideration for their team as yours tees off this afternoon at the local club.
mbart33
Cubs won world series and needed a right fielder-deal worked
Randomuser4567
This is a bad take. Winning a WS doesn’t mean every acquisition worked. They won despite Heyward in RF, not because of him
TylerBlackSimon
See also Barry Zito.
bucsfan0004
They won despite Joe Maddon, too. So much talent on that team at that time.
Kayrall
This is a fallacy. If your team won, then all cogs were worth it.
The Mets "Missed WAR"
Yeah. That deal did not work at all. They would have won without Heyward. Do you really believe that if the Cubs didn’t have every single player they had on their roster that year they wouldn’t have won the championship? There were several players that season who contributed heavily to the championship. Heyward was not one of them. They could have gotten a better right fielder for way less money. The worst part is Heyward is a big reason the Cubs are hurting now. He’s the highest paid player on the team and he’s one of the worst. He’s a perfect example of how too many fans want long term contracts. This is how a long term contract can help ruin a team. That was kind of Theo Epstein’s M.O. The Heyward deal reminds me a lot of the deal he gave to Carl Crawford deal. Overpay by a ton on a long term contract to a corner outfielder. When it becomes obvious very early on the contract is terrible for the team and will drag them down for years, just leave the team and let someone else deal with the problem Theo created. OTW out complain about how the Cubs paying $10 million a year for your services isn’t enough and that “was a factor in the decision to leave.”
golga333
Who rallies the team during the rain delay if Heyward’s not there?
1984wasntamanual
Any of the other players on the roster. There is also nothing to show that actually mattered to the outcome.
TylerBlackSimon
How about that Bobby Bonilla amirite?
chitown311
Good luck in the playoffs White Sox!
TylerBlackSimon
Kill Houston.
Kayrall
6-1 good guys
brandons-3
A little ironic to in that part of the appeal of Heyward was he was an elite defender and base runner coming off a good season with St. Louis and was about 26 years old. As everyone here can remember, he got that contract because the analytical community loved him and clubs felt he had more gears to unlock.
The only reason he was a free agent that offseason was because the Braves broke camp with him as the starting right fielder in 2010. Had they waited the 2-3 weeks, he would have been under control an additional year. Can’t see Heyward getting that contract after the 2016 season, assuming the production was similar.
Sideline Redwine
World series titles since signing:
Cubs – 1
cards – bupkis
Randomuser4567
Interesting to simply refer to it as a salary dump, like they didn’t get back some interesting players in the trade. After the season Darvish just had, maybe the cubs were on to something by trading him when they did.
seamaholic 2
Yeah I don’t dislike that trade. Didn’t at the time and don’t now.
bbatardo
Darvish wasn’t horrible overall, but once he hurt his hip he kept trying to pitch through it and change mechanics and the results were terrible.
TylerBlackSimon
But he has 8 pitches.
–every announcer ever
LordD99
No. It was a salary dump.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Actually you are all right, it was a salary dump and it was the right move unless they were going to add pieces to compete.
iverbure
It’s always better to trade someone a year early than too late. And in baseball it’s always better to trade the guy making 20 mil + whenever you can if the sucker is picking up most of the players salary.
TylerBlackSimon
Always take 10,000 to 1.
TylerBlackSimon
This is correct. They even went after more pitching later in the season.
Oldman58
Is this how Cardinal fans dry their tears after last nights loss by criticizing the Cubs and the Heyward contract? Funny. But back to the subject at hand, Cubs ownerships did say they are not spending any money again, it’s ridiculous that they went from a top organization to a bottom feeder. Maybe Jed Hoyer can go out and get another Zach Davies that worked out super well didn’t it. Hoyer is a pawn of owner Tom Ricketts and he isn’t respected around Chicago and possibly MLB
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Ninety percent of GMs are pawns of the owner, it is a business and owners dictate employee decisions. Just some owners micromanage more than others. I would like to see the Cubs have reunions with Chafin and Soler, plus pick up at least one solid starting pitcher. Keep Hendricks and Contreras at least until mid season so both can rebuild trade value.
iverbure
Daddytbone didn’t watch 2016 nor understood how it was built. If you want a education just ask buddy.
Dunk Dunkington
Where is the part that the Rickets will not spend this offseason? I missed that.
All I heard was Hoyer will be looking for “value” and being smart in free agency, but did not rule top free agents either .
I am totally ok with Hoyer coming out and not saying “We plan to spend BIG in free agency!” approach, you lose some leverage and sets up unrealistic expectation to the fans when it does not work out.
Nothing wrong spending smart and look for value guys, you need to if you want to contend. Cubs payroll will sit around $75 – $80 million once Contreras and Happ are added. Plenty of room to work with. Spending big in free agency does not guarantee anything.
qbass187
Bold
Lloyd Emerson
Italics
stevewpants
Underline
TylerBlackSimon
Highlight
Halo11Fan
We saw last night that bullpens are extremely important. Finding starting pitching is hard, expensive and full of land minds.
Build a deep bullpen, develop your rotation and supplement your rotation.
Whatever you do, don’t ignore the pen and think it’s going to work itself out.
Angels & NL West
It was interesting to see two recent Angels RP play prominent roles out of the pen for Boston and St. Louis – Hansel Robles and Luis Garcia.
TylerBlackSimon
It’s as if the Angels are a garbage organization.
AshamedMethGoat
Great take!
This is why the Dodgers failed to come out of the NL prior to 2017…No trustworthy bullpen arms to bridge to prime Kenley Jansen, so starters got left in even when clearly gassed
TylerBlackSimon
Bad managing too.
hyraxwithaflamethrower
Sustainability ought to be their priority this time around. The Cubs built a winner and flags fly forever, but they also mucked up by making some ill-advised trades, not signing players to extensions early, and realizing too late that their window had closed. They could’ve gotten much better hauls last year for the guys they shipped out and shortened this rebuild by a year or two. Here’s hoping they learn from what other teams have done differently.
TylerBlackSimon
Farm to table that sh-t.
stymeedone
Last flag in Wrigley had to fly over 100 years. Here’s hoping the current one won’t have to last “forever” before the next.
Samuel
Epstein has never had any idea about developing pitching (he forever fires his pitching coaches), and it appears Hoyer falls into that category. They have an ex-Catcher as a Manager, he can’t do anything about the pitching.
–
For years I wrote here that the Larry Rothschild was hurting the Yankees as their pitching coach. I got a lot of “He’s the best in the business” by Yankee fans that always defend their team from January to the end of September, then write the same thing I wrote. For 3 years I said the Yankees needed a new pitching coach. Finally they dumped the big name Rothschild who appealed to Preller, so Rothschild signed with the Padres and screwed up most of their pitchers. Meanwhile, the Yankees were smart enough to steal a pitching coach from the Indians that know how to work with pitchers. Working primarily with failing and rehab projects, the Yankees ended the year ranked around 6th in MLB pitching (and that was with a poor defense).
–
My point is that fans think like Epstein – just spend money and buy pitching. Doesn’t work like that. Pitches have to be developed and recalibrated at the ML level during the season. The Cubs have no structure in place to work with pitchers – which is why they have a problem. Almost any name Pitcher they overpay for is going to get to that team and slowly regress.
Dunk Dunkington
I do agree about the pitching but they have actually made some adjustments on the pitching side and appears to be improving,
They drafted Jordan Wicks who reminds me a ton of Cole Hamels, Marquez and Franklin are still high quality prospects but did miss the whole minor league season but the upside is very high with those two, Steele showed some promise (backend type) if Alzolay learns to get lefties out he could be a solid mid rotation guy, Thompson has some intriguing upside and worse case he is a strong bullpen arm. There are other pitchers as well, but those are the more highlighted ones at the moment.
Cubs will need much more pitching no doubt and more improvement, but it seems they might have at least turned the corner in that department. Still has ways to go, but maybe the Curse of Theo might be lifted when it comes to pitching development. because That is how you sustain success.
mbart33
Jeff Luhnow for gm- please
Dunk Dunkington
I am down.
I would not be surprised he takes the Mets job, but I think the Mets are done with controversy for a while, but they are the Mets so maybe that is just there thing.
Rsox
Every teams priority is pitching so no news there. But for the Cubs the question is do they really guys like Schwindel, Wisdom, and Ortega as everyday players and actually believe they will perform the way they did last season? Because that is really the difference between pursuing say, Marcus Stroman or signing Trevor Cahill
Dunk Dunkington
The reality is Wisdom and Ortega are solid stopgap options but should not be considered in the long term plans unless they force Hoyer to do so next season. A
Swindell was hitting everything, while he will not produce like he did this year, the league will make the proper adjustments but he at least shown enough to penciled into the 2022 lineup and see what happens, but even Hoyer at the press conference would not say if Swindell would be the starting 1b next season, because if the A’s do a fire sale then you cannot pass up a chance to get a Matt Olson type.
So right now they are good stopgap options and if something better comes long and pushes them out, Hoyer will not hesitate to make that move.
it should not stop Hoyer making a move for somebody like Stroman and Seager, if the rebuild is short, both still fit into the plan as I think Stroman will age well.
Randomuser4567
The cubs’ do not have enough talent to be trading for guys like Olson. They need to figure out some long term roster spots before acquiring someone like that. I will be very disappointed if they go at this like the Phillies did.
Dunk Dunkington
good point, fair enough.
Honestly I would just go with Swindell next season and see what happens.
Rsox
A’s have no reason to have a fire sale this winter
Peart of the game
How I would proceed if I was in control of the Cubs: start by signing a 1B (Rizzo redux, etc), two back end starter types (Eric Jokisch as a lower cost version and one other with high upside like Dylan Bundy.) Bullpen pieces on the cheap to sell off at the deadline. Could be an 70 win team cheaply. Should at least be better than the pirates.
Dunk Dunkington
I did not know Eric Jokisch was still pitching, he is killing it in Korea. He would be a low cost signing for the Cubs to make, Jokisch is a former Cubs farmhand.
Randomuser4567
Why invest in a position they actually have potential fits for already? Signing a guy like Rizzo doesn’t make a lot of sense for a team in their position
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Anthony Rizzo is one of my favorite players, but the only reason to sign him is nostalgia.
chace alexander
Watch them go out and add Arrieta again
MLB Top 100 Commenter
No, that won’t happen, no Arrieta. Better chance that they convert Heyward to a pitcher.
Curveball1984
Arrieta is finished. The only person that doesn’t see it is Jake. He’s been in decline since the 2nd half of 2017. I don’t even see a team like the Rangers throwing him a minor league deal.
cubbbies15
I judge Jason Hayward harshly too. But if we go back to the 2015 season Everybody likes him. Whether he was a one year wonder or not. I believe he also helped lure Jon Lester to the cubs.