The Nationals never really got on track in 2020, perhaps because the shortened season didn’t allow them time for the type of turn-around that defined their 2019 championship run. With a number of key members of that title team heading into free agency, the Nats will look to reload for a return to the playoffs.
Guaranteed Contracts
- Stephen Strasburg, SP: $210MM through 2026
- Patrick Corbin, SP: $106MM through 2024
- Max Scherzer, SP: $50MM through 2021 ($15MM signing bonus, $35MM in deferred salary)
- Will Harris, RP: $16MM through 2022
- Starlin Castro, IF: $7MM through 2021
- Daniel Hudson, RP: $6MM through 2021
- Yan Gomes, C: $6MM through 2021
- Josh Harrison, IF: $1MM through 2021
- Sam Clay, RP: $575K through 2021
Arbitration-Eligible Players
Note on arb-eligible players: this year’s arbitration projections are more volatile than ever, given the unprecedented revenue losses felt by clubs and the shortened 2020 schedule. MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz, who developed our arbitration projection model, used three different methods to calculate different projection numbers. You can see the full projections and an explanation of each if you click here, but for the purposes of our Outlook series, we’ll be using Matt’s 37-percent method — extrapolating what degree of raise a player’s 2020 rate of play would have earned him in a full 162-game slate and then awarding him 37 percent of that raise.
- Joe Ross – $1.5MM (agreed to one-year, $1.5MM deal)
- Juan Soto – $4.5MM
- Trea Turner – $10.8MM
Option Decisions
- Anibal Sanchez, SP: $12MM club option for 2021 with $2MM buyout (declined)
- Adam Eaton, OF: $10.5MM club option for 2021 with $1.5MM buyout (declined)
- Howie Kendrick, IF: $6.5MM mutual option for 2021 with $2.25MM buyout (team declined)
- Eric Thames, 1B/OF: $4MM mutual option for 2021 with $1MM buyout (team declined)
Free Agents
- Sanchez, Eaton, Kendrick, Thames, Ryan Zimmerman, Asdrubal Cabrera, Sean Doolittle, Kurt Suzuki, Javy Guerra, Brock Holt, Paolo Espino, Sam Freeman, Roenis Elias, Welington Castillo, Michael A. Taylor (signed with Royals)
Washington took care of some early business in re-signing Josh Harrison before the free agent market even opened, bringing the veteran utilityman back on a one-year, $1MM deal. Between retaining Harrison and also adding former Diamondback Yasmany Tomas on a minor league contract for the first base mix, the Nats have taken steps to address an infield that could potentially be quite similar or quite different to 2020’s collection of talent.
We know Trea Turner will be at shortstop, and that Starlin Castro will return from a broken wrist to assume another everyday role, likely at second base. Carter Kieboom and Luis Garcia will both continue to get looks at the MLB level, though Kieboom struggled badly in his first extended taste of Major League action and Garcia didn’t hit much better while filling for Castro at second base. Harrison provides bench depth at multiple positions, Tomas or rookie Jake Noll could factor into first base, and it’s probably safe to assume that the Nats and longtime first baseman Ryan Zimmerman will explore another one-year pact after Zimmerman opted out of the 2020 season.
There’s certainly some room for growth here, which is why the Nationals have reportedly checked in on two major names in DJ LeMahieu and Kris Bryant. Both players have been Nats targets in the past, though LeMahieu has a much bigger price tag now than he did in his previous trip through free agency in the 2018-19 offseason, and landing Bryant could require some tricky negotiating with the Cubs. With Bryant coming off a down year, only one year of club control remaining and an $18.6MM projected arbitration salary in that final year, Chicago’s asking price for Bryant has surely lowered since last offseason. But, these same concerns could also lead the Nationals to prefer LeMahieu as a longer-term answer.
Of course, the x-factor is whether or not the Nats will spend on higher-priced talent, as recent reports suggest players like LeMahieu or Bryant might not be on the radar. It isn’t yet known whether GM Mike Rizzo will have the financial resources to make any significant additions, or if the front office will just have to avoid the top shelf in offseason shopping endeavors.
All of Washington’s free agents account for over $40MM in salary coming off the books, and the Nats also save in pure 2021 dollars since so much of the salaries owed to Max Scherzer and Stephen Strasburg are deferred. That said, D.C. has a projected payroll of just under $170MM for 2021 with a luxury tax number roughly $163.9MM, so ownership may not want to stretch that significant budget much further. One would imagine the Nationals also still want to set aside future payroll space for potential long-term extensions with Turner and Juan Soto, and the Nats will likely have some conversations with Scherzer about his future as he enters his final year under contract.
Until we get more of an idea about what the team is willing to spend, thoughts of acquiring LeMahieu, Bryant, or perhaps J.T. Realmuto may have to go on the backburner. That said, the unsettled nature of Washington’s position player mix gives Rizzo some flexibility in looking for upgrades.
The Nats have the freedom to acquire a one-position type — hypothetically, let’s say Kolten Wong at second base — to lock down a single position and go from there, or they could give manager Dave Martinez even more options for late-game maneuvering by adding other multi-positional players. While Harrison is already back in the fold, it also wouldn’t be a surprise if the Nationals looked to re-sign another of its veteran free agents (i.e. Howie Kendrick, Asdrubal Cabrera, Brock Holt) to further add depth.
The outfield also represents an area of need, as the Nats declined Adam Eaton’s option and opened up a hole in either left or right field. Soto will probably remain in his customary left field spot, though the superstar has played some right field and could change positions if the Nats landed a solid left fielder. Victor Robles remains the incumbent center fielder after a bout of COVID-19 led to a brutal year both offensively and defensively, and the Nationals can only hope that a healthy Robles can rediscover his 2019 form.
It might behoove the Nats to find an outfielder with center field capability just in case Robles struggles again, though Andrew Stevenson might be tabbed for a larger role after posting big numbers in limited at-bats in both 2019 and 2020. Depending on how big D.C. was willing or able to go with adding outfield help, acquiring Michael Brantley, Jackie Bradley Jr., or Joc Pederson would make some sense (and give Washington another left-handed bat), or the club could opt for a part-timer to share playing time with Stevenson and Harrison.
The presence of a DH spot in National League lineups in 2021 would also help Washington in finding another hitter, allowing for even more time-sharing and position-shifting. Someone like a Brantley (or a Marcell Ozuna, at the higher end of the market) would be even more of a fit for the District if the universal designated hitter was a sure thing, though a league decision on that front doesn’t appear to be imminent.
Let’s turn to the rotation, where the biggest question is how Strasburg will rebound. The right-hander tossed only five innings in 2020 due to hand problems that eventually resulted in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery, thus getting his seven-year, $215MM contract off to an ominous start in its first year. Scherzer and Patrick Corbin were also both more solid in 2020 than their usual excellent selves, and the Nationals surely hope that this dip in form was just temporary and not a sign of decline.
Since Anibal Sanchez’s option wasn’t exercised, Erick Fedde, Austin Voth, Joe Ross (who opted out of the 2020 season) and Wil Crowe are all in the mix for the fourth and fifth starter’s jobs. Particularly since there might be some doubts about the top three starters, the Nationals will certainly look into adding a veteran pitcher to help deepen the rotation. Trevor Bauer is probably too pricey a fit, but since Bauer might be the only free agent arm who could command a major multi-year deal, D.C. has its pick of several free agents that might require three years at the most.
Names like Masahiro Tanaka or Jake Odorizzi represent the upper tier of remaining available pitchers in the non-Bauer class, and this is another area that represents some fluidity for the Nationals. If they don’t want to spend a ton of resources on pitching, they could try to find essentially the next Anibal Sanchez — a veteran coming off a good season and with perhaps a couple of red flags on the resume that the Nats don’t feel are a big concern (or can be overlooked).
The bullpen continued to be an issue for Washington, and after investing in Daniel Hudson and Will Harris last winter, the Nats might not want to make more big expenditures on relief pitching. The team could opt to mostly stand pat and hope that Hudson pitches better as the preferred closing option, or perhaps look out for other closer-capable free agents, or perhaps elevate an internal candidate like Tanner Rainey into more high-leverage moments. D.C. has already re-signed Aaron Barrett to a minors contract and added minor leaguer Sam Clay on an MLB deal, but some more tinkering (left-handed relief is a particular need) is sure to come as the Nationals try to finally fix their relief corps.
With all the early focus on the Braves’ free agent pitching signings, the Marlins’ hiring of Kim Ng as general manager, the Mets’ expected splurge under new owner Steve Cohen, and the Phillies’ front office machinations, the Nationals have largely flown under the radar this winter. But, with so many needs around the diamond, the Nats could end up being one of the offseason’s busier teams. Given Rizzo’s track record of success in both major and seemingly minor acquisitions, possibilities abound for the Nationals in the coming months.
Brac2brac
2019 was ‘lightning in a bottle’ and they’re not likely to capture it again unless the big 3 of the pitching staff delivers
baseballpun
They were pretty solid for almost a decade before getting over the hump. They might be on the downswing but I don’t know if it’s fair to say 2019 was lightning in a bottle.
Brac2brac
@baseballpun
They live and die with the three pitchers. Your ‘.. they got over the hump..’ comment says virtually the same thing as ‘.. lightning in a bottle..’.
Take into account that the NL East is going to be a tougher place to play and W’s will be harder to come by bc ATL continues to improve while already winning the division, Mia improved and NYM are odds on favorites to add significant FA talent.
Doesn’t look like Washington gets out of the East (@ least not easily or obviously) and even you wouldn’t take the current Vegas line against LAD to bet on the Nats.
Now if the Big 3 are good-to-very good and get them to the playoffs while all three are healthy… they have more than just a puncher’s chance to beat LAD and win another championship.
kodiak920
That’s fair.
mumsy01
Hard to maintain excellence losing players like Rendon, Zimmerman and replacing them with inexperience. Now they’ll lose Eaton too. But Rizzo is an adept GM.
GoLandCrabs
Going 5-0 in elimination games with comebacks in every single one of them is absolutely lightning in a bottle. Rendon is gone. Kendrick who was on fire that postseason is gone. Some others as well. Nats will be lucky to not be in a complete rebuild in 2 years. They have nothing in the farm.
kodiak920
They have a decent assortment of high upside pitchers in the lower levels, but other than that, I agree, the farm is very barren.
Natsman1
Finishing the regular season 77-38 (the best record in MLB in that # of games) is that large a sample size laughs in the face of “lightning in a bottle”. To then do what they did in the postseason against quality teams further adds to said laughter.
its_happening
GoLand is right. In fact that rebuild could be a year from now rather than 2. All depends on 2021.
GoLandCrabs
They got insane breaks that postseason that a team may never get again. Phantom HBP, broken bat hit off Hader, Trent Grisham, Will Smiths ball dying at the warning track, AJ Hinch refusing to use the best pitcher in baseball in game 7. Don’t get wrong it was a great run but to say it wasn’t a flash in the pan is lying to yourself.
kodiak920
How about it was grinding and skill to get to the post-season, and lightning in the bottle in the post-season. At least, that’s how I looked at it. I never thought this was a dynasty in the making, but I did think they were a resilient club that got hot at the right time.
Natsman1
Exactly. Despite 17 postseason games, someone (conveniently) focuses on a measly FIVE plays and comes up with a lame LIAB “theory”. Please, as if it was the lowly Royals who won the WS.
lettersandnumbersonly
The 2nd half of the 2019 season far more resembled the true Nationals team than the first half. Yes, they did play a bit above their heads but it was obviously necessary and they came thru.
Lightning in a bottle? Probably a bit overestimating the luck portion. Obviously without players like Rendon and several other glue players the Nats will need to redefine themselves.
After some 45+ years as an Expos/Nationals fan, I’ll take a 2019 World Series and live on the post sugar high for at least another season or two.
If they let Scherzer leave, aren’t able to resign Turner AND Soto and Strasburg’s contract turns out to be as bad a contract as Scherzer’s was good due to health reasons… then I may take my ball and go home. But I’m giving it a 50/50 shot they don’t let me down.
jackkspratt
What you claim is that the Nationals won by luck. If they won everyone of those games you mention, it wasn’t luck, it was consistency, and because they were the best team. WS Champs! Serendipitous, perhaps, but not down to luck..
Papabueno
Name a single WS Champion that didn’t have some things go their way in the postseason.
Like all WS winners, their stars played like stars. Scherzer, Strasburg and Corbin were studs. Rendon and Soto were dominant.
The Nats had plenty of crazy stuff that didn’t go their way in previous playoff series.
I might be wrong, but I think the only team in the league with a better record the last decade is the Dodgers.
All the comebacks and 5-0 in elimination games were not luck.
The Nats absolutely earned that WS Championship. Throwing shade on them is absurd.
Yankee Clipper
If there is a GM named Mike Rizzo he should naturally be employed by a NY team.
baseballpun
The best name for a NY GM would be Reggie Seventysecondstreet.
VonPurpleHayes
His brother, Frank, was a crank-call legend.
kodiak920
Good one.
ABCD
How does Castro, Hudson, Rutledge, and a lottery pick for Bryant sound?
Veejh
Did you just smoke some crack?
ABCD
Nope, but you forgot to flush.
Veejh
Ok, here we go…..1) Bryant is a salary dump for the Cubs, why would they want to add two pieces in Castro and Hudson, who both have 1 year left on their contracts for a total of $11.5M? 2) This site has also listed Bryant as a non-tender candidate. You know why, because the Cubs have almost zero leverage and asking for a haul of players for a guy coming off an injury season with abysmal numbers is nuts. 3) Rutledge and Cavalli are 100% off limits from the Nats and you’re dreaming if you think that you could get either of those guys straight up for Bryant.
I think you need to readjust how much value you think Bryant has right now on the market.
kodiak920
Well done.
ABCD
I know KB doesn’t have a lot of value, but Castro and Hudson together do not have the value of Bryant. They are both overpaid – Castro is mediocre and Hudson has had one good season in the last five. They would offset the cost of Bryant’s salary.
Bryant has a decent chance of being an All-Star if he can stay healthy. (KB has been injured the past three seasons, but he plays through them.) And he also would probably be QOed if he performs well..
I can see you thinking Rutledge is untouchable because he’s one of the top two prospects, but he’s not a top 100 prospect either. If you wanted Bryant, who would you give up for him?
Natsman1
The Cubs have been dangling Bryant for 2 offseasons now. No one’s traded for him yet. Give it a rest already.
vtadave
Rutledge is a good,start, but why would the Cubs have any interest in two impending free agents?
juanpursuit
Nats would need cash from Chicago to make even Rutledge for Bryant be a fair deal.
keysox
Wait for today @7. Many players will be available.
Cubs should pull the trigger today on Bryant and Schwarber.
ABCD
I think Kyle is getting non-tendered. KB will probably be kept.
kodiak920
Yep.
Natsman1
Castro, Hudson, and Rutledge for a 1 year rental. How does that sound? Like a wildly delirious Cubs fan
Luc 2
I think they should get eddie rosario now that he is on wivers then get chris archer because jim hickey was his pitching coach in tampa.
NYYstateofmind
The critics agree, Wivers is a winner! “I paid nothing to watch this & I still want my money back!” raves The NY Times. CNN says, “if there’s television in hell this is on every channel!” And the Washington Post calls Eddie Rosario “The best thing to hit the airwaves since Pauly Shore.” Wifers, coming this Fall to abc
DM_Nats
If 2 of Garcia/Kieboom/Robles can pan out the Nats will be in business with Trea/Soto and our big 3 on the mound. Still think they’re a legit power bat away from being contenders again. Division will be tough but just gotta get in and anything can happen with that rotation..
juanpursuit
We don’t really need infield aside from 1B. We really need 1B and corner OF though (and to a slightly lesser extent C).
Natsman1
Washington is forced to “live and die with its’ 3 pitchers”. Wow. MLBTR should charge all of us a monthly fee for the privilege of reading such golden analysis.
kodiak920
The Nationals fortunes rest on the arms of the Big Three, as well as Kieboom and Robles living up to their minor league hype. If that happens, everything else should fall in to place, or, at least, is easier to correct. The window is closing but it isn’t quite closed yet. Just my opinion.
gino 2
Rizzo should be trading with the Yankees! Turner and Scherzer to the Yankees for Torres, Andujar, Sanchez, and 2-3top prospects.
3rd Andujar-SS Torres-2nd Garcia-1st??????????
C Sanchez
Sign Tanaka, C. Archer and trade for B. Snell.
Stratsburg, Corbin, Snell, Tanaka, Archer/Ross would be a very solid rotation.
For RF sign Y. Puig
LF Soto-CF Robles-RF Puig
To get Snell you trade Carter K., plus.
Amd with the opening at 1st base I would spend money and trade for A. Rizzo.
Trade Castrol, Hudson plus for Rizzo.
Sign B. Hand and Hendricks to fill out the bullpen.
That Nats would still be contenders.
Tom
The problem with that idea is that none of your suggested trade package would get any of the players you suggest. The Yankees aren’t given up Torres for an almost-done Scherzer and a lesser offensive player in Turner. The Cubs aren’t trading Rizzo. And TB will have tons of better offers for Snell.
Roll
You also forget to mention how much Scherzer is making which effectively takes the yankees out of ANY FA signings as they would be at or over the cap when ownership is trying to reset the cap when they need at minimum a pitcher and a catcher especially if you are trading your top 2-3 picks which are i believe are pitchers.
How about to help with RF and big bat the Yankees trade Stanton and Andujar to the Nationals for Turner. Its about on the same level as the other trades. This would give the nats the big bats and potentially a long term answer at 1B as i think andujar can be your 1b and when REALLY needed at 3b to give rest. This would improve the yankees as they improve their defense at SS with turner there and torres moving back to where he did well at the keystone as well as opens the DH spot to rotate players in and out of to get rests as they yankees have been very injury prone as of late.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
That’s a really easy No for the Nats. I get why a yankee fan would love that trade though, unload a player who can’t stay healthy with a bad contract, & a player with little value to obtain a player that is a plus in a premium position with control. That’d be some kind of magic trick.
kodiak920
To say nothing of the fact that Andujar and Sanchez have little value.
Roll
i was being sarcastic ( “Its about on the same level as the other trades.” ie the OP trade scenarios of “Turner and Scherzer to the Yankees for Torres, Andujar, Sanchez, and 2-3top prospects.”. ). I am not a yankees fan but trying to prove a point with the op just the other way.
Thats like me saying me as a mets fan want to trade degrom and mcneil for gary sanchez and tauchman because we need a catcher and center fielder 🙂
kodiak920
I wouldn’t say Turner is a lesser player. I would say he is a different player asked to do different things.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
You’d have to turn on the force trade portion of the game first. You might also need to modify the defensive abilities so you don’t have the worst left side def, along with hit tools. You’ll need the 28 man roster to compensate for all the bullpen innings required, all with saving after every game so you just turn off the system every time that rotation experiences an injury. Probably more importantly though, I can’t this is so bad.
HalosHeavenJJ
Pivotal season for the Nationals. I didn’t realize this.
A quick start and they likely add for another title push. But if they are sitting in third place at the break, they have some intriguing pieces to trade and start a retool/rebuild phase.
GooseGoslinGuy
It sure is funny to read this piece and responses on Sept. 27, 2021, given all the stuff projected here that never happened. Renegotiate with Scherzer? That sure never happened. What else? Oh yes, Trea Turner is a “lesser offensive player.” Does that hold if he wins the batting title? How about “the Cubs aren’t trading Rizzo”? And yes, my fave, “the Nats should sign Yasiel Puig.” Maybe we should leave the team in Rizzo’s hands, after all. I’m still scratching my head over getting rid of Schwarber, but I guess one man’s plan for the team is as good as all these others.