Like many or most other teams, the Rangers are planning to trim their payroll in response to the revenues lost during the shortened 2020 season. In a session with media earlier this week, managing partner Ray Davis told Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News and other reporters that “two major factors” will contribute to less spending next year.
“The first is how much baseball is going to lose [financially] in 2020. And also, the life cycle of our club,” Davis said. “We have some high-paid contracts rolling off our payroll. We will have some minimum salary players coming on. So, it gives a justification, if you will, to not to spend as much. The economics of baseball has been so sad this year and there is uncertainty about what 2021 will bring.”
The Rangers were projected to have a payroll in the $153MM range heading into the season, before the COVID-19 pandemic struck and the season was reduced to 60 games (thus reducing Texas’ outlay to roughly $65MM). Grant figures the club won’t go much, if at all, beyond the $100MM figure in 2021, though as Davis noted, some of that reduction was already baked into the future plans. Approximately $47.1MM will come off the books in the form of departing free agents, most notably Shin-Soo Choo and Corey Kluber — Texas holds a $14MM club option on Kluber for next season but that will surely be declined in the wake of Kluber’s injury-plagued year. It’s also worth mentioning that 2020 was the final year of the Rangers’ outstanding obligation to retired slugger Prince Fielder.
Assuming Grant’s $100MM projection is correct, that leaves Texas GM Jon Daniels with some room to maneuver, as Roster Resource has just under $62MM in payroll commitments on the Rangers’ books for the coming season. However, as Daniels has already publicly committed to a “youth movement” year in 2021, major expenditures don’t seem likely. The Rangers had already taken a generally more conservative approach to free agent spending in recent years, most notably their strategy of signing veteran pitchers (such as Lance Lynn, Mike Minor, Jordan Lyles, and Kyle Gibson) to multi-year deals that didn’t break the bank.
It remains to be seen if the Rangers will consider even those modest types of contracts this winter, though Davis did make it clear that Daniels will be the one continuing to weigh those decisions. Daniels has been running the team’s baseball operations department for 15 seasons, and though the Rangers have suffered through four straight losing seasons, Davis still believes in Daniels’ track record.
“Jon has demonstrated that he and his team can put together winning ballclubs,” Davis said. “If you thought about going out and replacing him, all you have is a question mark. We have a known entity. We have a group of guys that know how to get it done and I think they are going to get it done again.”
DarkSide830
maybe dont dispense silly amounts of money on terrible SP and mediocre position players.
Ji-Man Choi
They’re trying to find another Lance Lynn every offseason. I’m sorry but Jordan Lyles isn’t worth $8 million a year
Briffle2
Lyles is only wroth 8 million if he plays with Milwaukee.
GoLandCrabs
And when they strike gold and find a Lance Lynn they refuse to move him at peak value on a rebuilding team.
Ji-Man Choi
@crabs but it’s not like they “struck gold” on Lance. He’s always been a good, durable, and underrated Major League pitcher. He wasn’t as good with STL as he’s been with TEX, but it’s not like he was horrible and they turned him around. Maybe I interpret “struck gold” differently as you
Mjm117
Like Jake Arrieta?
looiebelongsinthehall
Just a horrible year to be a free agent “star” but not a “superstar” as most teams will rightfully be spending conservatively during this continued period of the unknown. I still say the league and MLBPA should work out some type of one year player option at say 75% of their 2020 non-prorated salary. This was just so unexpected.
Stevil
Rangers to *tank in 2021…
Seriously, Texas needs to rebuild. There are just too many holes.
justinkm19
They already are.
racosun
How much of that new stadium was publicly-financed? I’m sure fans are excited to watch 40-50 losses per year there.
RunDMC
Half of the $1.2B. Interesting how it’s setup:
“The project cost for Globe Life Field is approximately $1.2 billion. The master agreement for this public-private partnership calls for a 50-50 split between the Texas Rangers and the City of Arlington, with the City’s financial contribution capped at $500 million. The City’s contribution be will funded by a ½ cent sales tax, 2% hotel tax, and a 5% car rental tax. The Texas Rangers’ original 30-year lease on the City-owned Globe Life Park in Arlington was set to end in 2024. With the new master agreement, the Rangers’ partnership with Arlington extends until January 1, 2054.” (MLB.com)
arc89
That is called redistribution of wealth to the rich elites. Seriously I do not understand why people are OK with giving their money to some rich billionaire who owns a baseball team. Do the fans get free tickets for the contribution? No So the people of the area will be giving money to the baseball owners with nothing in return.
DrDan75
The main reason that San Diego no longer has an NFL team is because the voters in that city declined to fund a new stadium for the Chargers. I voted “no” too.
I don’t believe in public financing of sports venues. Not everyone is a sports fan. Baseball teams are mostly private businesses (although the Braves and I think the Indians are publicly traded). Owners of private businesses should pony up the money themselves or find investors to fund their ballparks like all other businesses do.
Yankee Clipper
It’s because of the other businesses a professional stadium/team brings to the area. I’m not saying you’re completely wrong, but it’s not completely one-sided. The residents and city do reap benefits from a professional team which is why billionaires leverage cities like this.
arc89
In Oakland the raiders demanded a $2 billion stadium for a city that was still paying off the last stadium upgrade. Davis knew that Oakland did not have the money and already cut a deal with Vegas. Now with the pandemic there is no revenue from the hotel tax and sales tax to pay for the stadium. Each property owner will end up paying at least $1000 per resident over the next 20 years in property tax. If Vegas tourism still declines into next year it could double the taxes on the home owners. Would you pay a $1000 of your money just so a football team comes to your city? NO
looiebelongsinthehall
The penny tax for all is a small way for the entertainment and jobs the stadium brings. The hotel and car rental tax will mostly be paid by tourists and businesses including MLB. I’ve seen worse deals for municipalities.
looiebelongsinthehall
*.5 cent tax.
DrDan75
@YC:
Yeah that’s the main talking point to justify public financing for shiny new stadiums. I don’t buy it. They’re just socializing the costs and privatizing the profits. San Diego hasn’t fallen apart since the Chargers left.
arc89
Problem is the hotel tax like in Vegas used to go to schools so there was less taxes for property owners to pay. Now the school tax is paid only by the property owner. So when they tell you that the hotel tax is paying for the stadium it means now you are paying taxes for waht the hotel tax used to pay for.
detroitfan69
I think it’s because people want jobs in the other ones creating jobs are the so-called rich who pay a majority of the taxes in this country. As far as publicly funded stadiums go usually there a win-win situation. I said usually not always
Yankee Clipper
Arc, although you’re correct in assuming most people would not want to pay that, most people don’t ever plan on something like that happening. Cities don’t typically make decisions unilaterally without some type of public vote/referendum. Again, I’m not defending the methodology, but if people accept it, it will continue, just like ridiculous ticket prices, etc. This blame cannot be laid at the feet of the owners.
It is the fans, because we like sports too much to say, no. The owners know this so they take advantage, which is both human nature and shrewd.
Honestly, you have to vote for new politicians or accept the decisions of those where you live in how taxes are allocated.
CowboysoldierFTW
This! Why should I pay taxes on a new stadium that was not needed.
Javia
Qualcomm would bring a ton of jobs to a city as well. They do not receive free factories and office buildings when they come to town.
hiflew
Depends on how dependent my income is on the money that stadium brings in. People forget that stadiums generate a LOT of income for surrounding areas, most of which have very little to do with sports. Small restaurants and boutiques near the stadium require those tourist dollars to stay afloat. Not to mention parking lots. Take the stadium away and you take away a lot of tourist dollars. Sure you might save $1000 in taxes, but some will lose tens of thousands in income. Seriously, are you going to go to Detroit or Buffalo or Green Bay if its not to watch a sporting event?
CursedRangers
The parking lot is another boondoggle for the team. The city owned the parking lots and sold them the the Rangers owners for a whopping dollar! One dollar – not joking. On top of that the city deemed the parking to be a tax free area. Pure cash going right into the pockets of the owners, with no stipulations attached. Crazy what that money could have done for teachers, firefighters, and the likes.
Ricky Adams
1/2 was paid by increase in sales tax in city of arlington
Chief Two Hands
The Rangers are not relevant.
throwinched10
Goodluck trading Odor. Nobody wants him. Ill take his right hook though!
arc89
I expect most teams will be reducing payroll with all the money they lost this year. This is the year you will see most free agents take the QO. Watch all the 1 year deals signed waiting for 2022 when payroll goes back up.
Lloyd Emerson
Except the collective bargaining agreement ends after the 2021 season and a lot of people are expecting there to be no baseball in 2022…
arc89
there will be baseball in 2022. There is to much money at stake for the players to for go and the owners. There should be changes to the deal. Qualify offers will go away with no compensation for free agents. leaving.
looiebelongsinthehall
Agreed arc and don’t be surprised when very few are offered the qualifying offer.
Dorothy_Mantooth
Baseball should adopt a similar process that the NFL uses. If you lose more talent to FA than you acquire in FA, then you should get some sort of supplemental draft pick compensation. However, teams that sign FA’s should not be subject to draft pick penalties for signing free agents. This means the qualifying offer either needs to go away or they can replace it with a ‘Franchise Tag’ much like the NFL. Players who get tagged would need to be paid the average of the Top 5-10 salaries at their position, so MLB teams would rarely use it unless they have a Mike Trout type of talent who can’t agree to a long term extension.
bravesfan
It’s a bad time to be going through a rebuild. Typically in normal times, they can count on relatively high revenue to sort of prepare for the future. Put a little away so that when a big time player with a big contract comes, they can pull the trigger. Hate that for them. In general, I like the rangers organization. Baseball is big in Texas and even before Houston cheated their way into relevance, I liked the rangers more.
Orel Saxhiser
This is why I like the expanded playoff field. More teams in the post-season would put an end to tanking and endless rebuilds. Why rebuild when you can sneak into the bottom of the playoff field and perhaps make a run behind a couple of hot pitchers? More teams in contention would also add excitement. A pet peeve of mine is how football takes over in September in many markets because the local MLB team is a thousand games out.
RunDMC
What doesn’t help are the ever-changing broadcast rights between the regular season, playoffs and how many cable channels carry them. While having the in-season MLB.tv package that covers most of the games (minus blackout territories), the playoffs require a cable subscription spanning a minimum 3 channels. Even for a seasoned fan that is desperate and flexible to make it work — I couldn’t imagine what your casual fan is doing that doesn’t already have the overpriced cable channel package during a pandemic is doing. Seems like college/pro football takes over the broadcast channels only muddying the waters more. I wish MLB.tv would extend a paid-tier to their reg season package that would allow you to watch…but then these cable channels paying billions of dollars wouldn’t have exclusivity rights…smh
SashaBanksFan
I agree about expanded playoffs reducing tanking and rebuilds. I’m pulling for the marlins to win to show any team can qualify even if the shortened season created abnormal results. The more teams that feel they have a reasonable chance for the playoffs the better
gw9999
Ironicall, last offseason they declared themselves players in the upper tier of the free agency market only to not close a single significant deal, Onlty change this year is they are being upront with their willingness to spend in free agency.
bobtillman
The economic realities of 2020 hit the mid-market teams significantly. I’m pretty sure the Rangers made real money in previous years; and equally sure they lost real money in 2020. And like the man said, 2021 is a whole bunch of uncertainty.
The 100M threshold seems fair. In normal times, that should be the salary “floor” for every team. But without revenue streams (Revenue Sharing among them), that probably isn’t possible for 2021. In Texas, I’d probably eschew the Free Agent market, and instead go after the plethora of non-tenders (especially from small market teams) that are going to flood the market.
Rangers29
I hope JD sees a youth movement, and puts Calhoun in place of Choo, and not like Tejeda in place of Andrus. He’s too young. Keep Huff and Tejeda down, and keep Taveras in CF. Jung has had rave reviews so far at the alternate site. Solak will be in left field, and I expect improvement with the bat and glove because of stability. I have had an interest in Madrigal ever since he came up, and I really want us to put together a package to get him (which would include Lynn). I hope we don’t take this as fielding a AA roster.
User 1104686089
Then what do you do with Foscoe? that kid can play and should be a bat first 2B in the vein of Jeff Kent. I would love that in Texas.
Ricky Adams
Problem for rangers is that they have already cut payroll 4 of last 5 yrs. The whole time preaching 2020. 2020 alot of money should come off books. 2020 new stadium opens, 2020 should have solid young core to build around. 2020 well start spending again. But they didnt spend that time and money acquiring and developing young players. They spent it on lance lynn, mike minor, todd frazier, asdrubal cabrera, logan Forsythe. And now 2020 is here and the teams worse off than it was in 15 and 16, so now that 3-4 yr retooling is gonna turn into a 8-10 yr full on rebuild. And, I dunno about most ranger fans, but I been a ranger guy since 87-88 and I’m burnt out on this mediocre team, that continually cuts payroll, shops at the bottom of the barrel, and gets worse year in and year out, not better. And u can use the lost revenue argument till cows come home but I just dont see how it applies to rangers. 1 uve got 2 billionaire owners 2 slot of lost revenue was recouped by umps taking cut in pay and players taking prorated salaries 3 their operational costs went down just as much as revenue did. 4. Uve still got merchandising money and broadcasting rights money coming from fox sports 5. U weren’t gonna have a substantial revenue from in person games anyway with a last place team 6. There should be money from 15-19 when u were already cutting payroll 7. U were supposed to have spent last season and u whiffed on Donaldson, rendon, arenado, cole, ryu, and castellano and ur big acquisition was corey kluber that nobody else in baseball thought was worth a reliever and 4th outfielder and they were obviously right bc he lasted 1 inning. And finally. Ur not gonna recoup revenue in 2021 by cutting costs and ffg yielding a team that most o ffg players should be in double a. That’s gonna lose more money not regain money, esp since they’re like to jackup ticket, parking, and concession prices. Just sell, please sell.
Dorothy_Mantooth
The new Rangers stadium is a perfect analogy to the current Rangers team. The blueprints and artist renderings of the new stadium were gorgeous! They still have those drawings on the Rangers website. However, the ‘finished product’ is an unmitigated disaster. They planned to build the Taj Mahal, instead they built a Costco warehouse. The 2021 Rangers will be much more Costco than the expected masterpiece everyone was hoping/waiting for.
CowboysoldierFTW
Its freaking ugly as can be on the outside
66TheNumberOfTheBest
All these teams trying to reduce payroll because they don’t have any fans in their stands…
For once, Nutting is ahead of the curve.
Yep it is
153 million for that club. The first payroll savings should be getting rid of Jon Daniels. OMG how do you spend that kind of dough for that type of roster? Has to be one of the 3 worst GM’s in all of sports.
User 1104686089
Hahaha not even close. He’s not even close to the worst in baseball. I don’t think you can say that about a guy who has been to the playoffs 5 times in the last decade.
No Soup For Yu!
Rangers have actually only been to the playoffs four times in the last 10 years, and have no playoff berths in the last four of those ten years. Daniels was a good GM at one point but he’s clearly lost something, and his refusal to trade Lynn at the deadline (when his value was never going to be higher), is a perfect example of that. They also can’t draft anyone worth a dang. After Gallo, the Rangers’ most successful draft pick in the last 10 years to suit up for the team is Alex Claudio. There isn’t really any reason to be confident in this team or their direction, but a new GM would be a start. New owners would be nice too.
Javia
It takes 2 to tango in a trade. I kept seeing Texas fans on here expecting multiple excellent prospects or a single top 20 type of prospect for Lynn. The market just wouldn’t have supported a trade like that.
No Soup For Yu!
And yet, if the market didn’t support that it wouldn’t have mattered because that was going to be Lynn’s peak value. If the Rangers were on the edge of contention for next year then holding off on trading for a less than stellar return would have been understandable, but this team is years from contention and even if the return wouldn’t have been great, it’s not going to be magically higher when he’s older, has less control and the number of contending teams returns to normal. With sub-500 teams making it to the playoffs, there were more buyers this year than there ever were and ever will be, but those teams that made it in this year won’t make it next year, removing potential buyers.
Don Smith
Trusting J. Daniels to build a winning team is like Jerry Jones thinking Jason Garrett could coach in the NFL….Aint going to happen.
bradthebluefish
What’s the point of being a Dallas team if you won’t spend and won’t go for it.
jjschwertner9
What a joke of an organization. It’s not Daniels, it’s the tightwad owners.