There’s a spreading optimism — or, at least, a spread of reporting about optimism — regarding the return of baseball in 2020. But the pandemic shutdown has already stung MLB teams and the near-term revenue prospects remain poor, even if a television-only campaign is launched.
Unsurprisingly, even as teams prepare to refund fans for games that won’t be played as expected, we’re seeing enhanced efforts on the part of MLB organizations to cut costs. As Pirates GM Ben Cherington put it (via Jason Mackey of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette), “revenues aren’t coming in” but “cash is still going out.”
The notoriously tight-fisted Bucs have enacted austerity policies. But sources tell Mackey that the team isn’t among those in the roughest shape financially around the game. The Pirates have stopped 401(k) contributions and suspended fellowship/internship programs while top-level leaders take reductions in pay. Cherington says “the full expectation is that [401(k)] contribution will go back into effect as soon as possible,” and emphasized that the hope was to “find some savings without too much impact on people and their everyday lives.”
None of these sorts of measures are pleasant, but Pirates employees seem to be in better stead than those of the Rays. Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times reports that the low-budget Tampa Bay outfit has become the first MLB organization “to implement aggressive expense cutting moves” — in particular, furloughing some full-time employees and cutting the pay of others that earn above a certain threshold.
The Rays are covering health insurance for furloughed staff and the hope remains to bring many jobs back online. But the move reflects the stark realities of the sport in the era of COVID-19. Per Topkin, the top organizational leadership advised employees of concern that the revenue drag could continue for years to come.
Like the Rays, the Athletics have been scrimping and saving while working through difficult new-ballpark negotiations and planning. With those efforts now confronted by an entirely new sort of hurdle, and the near-term revenue outlook plummeting, the Oakland club is considering cuts of its own, according to Ken Rosenthal and Alex Coffey of The Athletic (subscription link). The A’s may actually be contemplating something rather more aggressive than what the Rays just enacted. The Athletic reports that the Oakland org is “discussing extensive layoffs” and could ultimately carry a “significantly smaller staff on both the business and baseball sides.”
Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle also examines the A’s situation. Employees say they have no idea what to expect and the team hasn’t responded to requests for comment. It remains to be seen how the situation will be handled, but with every other team in the league having already charted a path, the silence is ominous. Slusser doesn’t offer a definitive prediction, but does warn: “don’t be surprised” if major cuts occur.
These three teams may be pressed into action sooner than some peers, but the issues aren’t limited to lower-budget organizations. As Mackey writes in the above-linked post, and as we have covered in recent weeks, several other clubs have also pursued cost-reduction strategies that impact employees. And The Athletic reports that multiple teams around the league have had some level of internal discussion of major changes to their operations. At the moment, every team in baseball aside from the A’s and Rays has promised to retain full-time employees through the end of May. Hopefully, there’ll be sufficient clarity and optimism in the outlook at that point to avoid broader cuts.
hOsEbEeLiOn
Should just close the comments now.
People are just going to show up and start whining and complaining about the owners being cheap.
Going to get a few going on tirades and tantrums about the owners handling of employees affected by corona.
johnnydubz
Well in all fairness everyone is cheap. Look at State,Federal level who have screwed people. Cuomo told people who are committing suicide over losing their livelihood is to get over it and we are in this together. A man making 200,000 is saying he is struggling. He told people to get essential jobs as if they are available or his lack of care for people’s safety. He refuse to wear a mask while telling others to do so in public or you are breaking the law
bringoutthegimp
And Pence runs around the Mayo Clinic with no mask on. I guess you didn’t see that. Cuomo is one million times smarter then the !
4WSsince04
Comments two and three (Johnny am bring) just proved the original comment……complaints started immediately!!
jorge78
Good
Eyes!
LongTimeFan1
2johnnydubz
Just stop it.
Cuomo’s struggling to save lives and here you are bashing him over those who opted to kill themselves.
njbirdsfan
Great…so next time you want a raise and the employer says we don’t have the money, don’t come on here crying.
Meanwhile, you have every mom and pop business out there wanting free money from the hated government because they didn’t have the foresight to have a few months of emergency set aside, but let me guess, it’s the taxpayers’ responsibility to socialize their losses, but when things go well again all the profits will be kept by them..
I thought this was supposed to be a capitalist country? Odd how Republicans are all about free money, as long as it’s going in their pockets.
KCJ
Also odd how Democrats are all about free money as long as it’s coming OUT of the Republicans pockets
4WSsince04
KCJ – they would rather a company go bankrupt than lower wages to stay in business.
LongTimeFan1
@KCJ,
Standard Repub talking point to deflect facts about themselves.
LongTimeFan1
@4WSsince04
Rather amazing you’d say that right after another poster bashes the working poor for not having a rainy day fund.
wild bill tetley
LongTimeFan liking his/her own comment probably worse than the comment itself.
User 4245925809
Working poor is 1 thing, but entire cities are not, which this entire discussion turned into. There are multiple states (all blue) in the hole and expect to be bailed out. That’s not going to happen with this administration with decades worth of giveaway policies to unions, good-old-boys and out and out cronyism that has/is rampant in those states.
All that was stated by a certain LEAD senator was there are going to be no bail outs of those states and to file bankruptcy, not to blame the virus as any cause of their financial woes.
Once again.. Libby values rise to more lies.
jorge78
You mean the
snapping turtle
who is so clueless
he doesn’t even
know states
cannot legally
declare
bankruptcy?
That one?
Not
comforting…..
keysox
Tampa bay owners are clueless. Mlb get them out of Florida and MLB.
Many people want teams. No new stadium. Clue players. They are a joke.
emac22
Johnsilver likes to talk but is he a liar? Is he clueless? Is he on welfare like his red state champions?
The blue states pay for the red states and if you’d research anything you would know that.
LongTimeFan1
@njbirdsfan
A lot of working folks don’t have the extra money for rainy day fund. Stop bashing hard working people going through hard times and struggling to make ends meet.
And just stop with the nonsense that it’s Democrats taking Republican money. Silly talking point I’ve heard for years while Republicans have no problem taking Democratic money.
Moreover, it would be nice for a change to quit attacking people who are down to score political points all the time. Give it a rest. Be grateful you’re alive and that there are people willing to help struggling Republicans and Democrats live another day and feed their families. The virus doesn’t give a hoot about political parties or politics.
wild bill tetley
Dems don’t want tax cuts or believe in them. Therefore they take. Problem solved, argument over, you can go back to sleep after you upvote your own comment. Unless, ofcourse, you have a real baseball take on a baseball site.
jorge78
Njbirdsfan: the issue is simple. The gubmint shut down the economy to save lives and it feels a responsibility to make up for the economic loss.
Case closed.
jorge78
Fair warning from the Lion!
tigerdoc616
Which is why I can’t see them playing a season to empty stadiums without getting the players to agree to salary reductions. TV money is great, but gate receipts and all the other ancillary income associated with the game is still very important. A lot of teams will be better off cutting their losses by not playing a season.
emac22
Poor teams can trade players they can’t afford and pass on free agency next year.
Dom2
Lol of course the Pirates cut 401ks and the Rays are just going LEAVE to everyone.
chico65
I thought it was fairly well established that revenue sharing covered most payroll costs for teams like PIT and MIA. Hard to believe they don’t have enough $$$ from other streams to cover 401ks.
Phanatic 2022
What are their costs? How much do those streams bring in?
Gterm
Nice quote from my Bucs…“revenues aren’t coming in” but “cash is still going out.” Last 10 years lots of revenue was coming in with NO cash going out.
keysox
Sell them to Nashville
DonB34
By my calculations, the Pirates should still have money left over from the Liriano trade that was supposed to save millions AND net them the real prize….. Drew Hutchinson.
mike156
At the end of the day, this is a business, and the billionaires who own these teams didn’t become billionaires by spending more than they had to. They may try to keep essential personnel on, they may be cognizant of PR, but capital almost always has the upper hand over labor, and there’s no reason to expect this time will be different. Trump used the Defense Production Act to reopen meat processing plants while granting those owners immunity from liability. I’d have to think that some owners might think that appealing–reopen, tell employees to return to work, with the understanding that if they get the virus, that’s their risk, and perhaps even fans as well–that purchasing a ticket is a waiver of liability.
I wouldn’t be surprised if that happens–and if a lot of workers and fans go along.
RunDMC
I had Pirates tickets and they contacted me about a refund, rather than chasing them down. Now, I haven’t seen that refund yet for a 6/2 game, but was pleasantly surprised how forthcoming they were. Can’t wait to catch a game at that beautiful park.
ScottCFA
I understand a mom and pop restaurant or store operating on probably zero margin after the owners pay themselves a market-level salary, but sports franchises worth $1-$2 billion? I find it hard to believe that a billion-dollar business isn’t better prepared. What would they do in the event of a strike that couldn’t be resolved?
kylelohse
Well for one, they wouldn’t be paying player salaries if there was a strike.
hOsEbEeLiOn
What business model is prepared to pay salaries at same levels when revenue is cut to basically $0.
Baseball isn’t like Walmart or other big business who’ve been able to maintain revenue coming in.
Deals with food and drink companies aren’t bringing in revenue, they’re having to give refunds for tickets they already sold, and guarantee tv deal isnt paying them since there’s no televised games so far. They’ve got $0 revenue.
Also, net worth =/= how much money is in your bank account.
Robertowannabe
The worth of a sports team is what they can expect to sell the franchise for. That does not mean that they have that much cash or assets that can be made liquid to pay bills with.
ohyeadam
They can take out a loan like everyone else
bobtillman
As I’ve noted, this is only the beginning. Large market teams won’t have the necessary revenue to share with their poorer brethren. And you can bet the John Henry-s of the world will finagle their books to make their situation looks worse. Moreover, Revenues Sharing and payments from the Central Fund are the LARGEST source of income for small market teams.
It’s going to get very, very ugly.
emac22
Ugly as in player salaries going down?
How exactly is the world impacted if salaries go down 50%
Maybe the pandemic has reset my meter but player salaries are a pretty easy lever to use to adjust to income changes.
FSogol
Why hasn’t some sports “journalist” asked why the teams didn’t have a rainy day fund set up? The collective bargaining agreement deadline is approaching and work stoppages due to strikes or lockouts are possible. No team started preparing for that scenario?
Kudos to the Rays for keeping up with the insurance payments to the people they laid off.
hOsEbEeLiOn
Better question is why the MLBPA doesn’t have a rainy day fund set up for players. They may but to negotiate salaries during the hiatus suggests other wise.
In the event of a work stoppage you’d see similar tactics of cutting front office salaries if stoppage prolonged. What you wouldn’t see if them paying lower level employees, at all.
Most employees are seasonal in nature. Meaning they have other jobs when it’s not baseball season. Nobody thought hey people are going to lose all their jobs in one single global event and have no source of income, at all.
FSogol
Regarding the MLBPA, they do. They started keeping a percentage of players checks for a possible work stoppage due to collective bargaining agreement expiring after 2021. They started in in 2018, IIRC.
hOsEbEeLiOn
2 years worth? Very short sighted.
When the CBA is ratified they should still collect a % based on salary and stash it away somewhere.
User 4245925809
Try getting that 100 headed and confused union to do that.. It would end up as a slush fund, going towards political enablers, or siphoned off to some other end just like every other union does. Why do you think union participation across the country has been dropping the last 50y? Another scam with those at the upper levels the worst.
DonB34
The average MLB salary was $4.6 Million last season. I’m not going to feel too badly for them if they don’t have a “rainy day fund” set aside. I’d venture to say most readers here won’t earn that in a lifetime.
hOsEbEeLiOn
I was thinking more along the lines of a rainy day fund for guys in the minors.
Mlb players were once minor Leaguers I think they can relate to the struggle.
waylonmercy
due to the pandemic, many companies have reduced there television advertising budgets so the television networks are crying poor too. if there is a 2020 season, I believe the television networks will insist on paying significantly lower broadcast rights fees to televise the Games; possibly by as much as 50%.
emac22
With all the people staying home and so little live programming ratings will be the best they’ve ever been.
In general advertising is lower but it’s a presidential election year and baseball will be the most effective ad buy available. A lot of companies are doing well and the ones that aren’t need to advertise.
Unless baseball screws it up by failing to provide a full schedule.
jessaumodesto
Wonder if the A’s will let go of their players to help cover the cost of Covid19
emac22
Every team probably cuts payroll to deal with this.
emac22
Maybe if they go with the 3 10 team leagues they could have one of them be filled with the financially desperate teams and have them play 1/2 the season in China before returning to the states for the second half.
With no fans it doesn’t really matter where you play but playing in China would create new fans and markets just because they were playing and marketing there.