The Nationals have renewed Juan Soto’s contract and will pay the outfielder $629.4K in 2020, USA Today’s Bob Nightengale reports (Twitter link). The two sides were unable to agree on a salary for 2020, and thus the Nationals simply set their own figure for Soto’s contract in the coming season, as is the team’s right since Soto is a pre-arbitration player.
Each club has its own methodology for determining how much beyond the $563.5K minimum salary pre-arb players can earn, usually based on some type of formula that assigns extra money for service time and/or significant achievements. Pre-arbitration players can’t really negotiate since the club controls their rights, so the large majority of pre-arb players simply agree to whatever figure is offered. Some pre-arb players coming off particularly outstanding seasons, however, feel they should be better rewarded for this performance, and sometimes opt to turn down the team’s offered raise rather than accept what they feel is simply inadequate compensation.
Needless to say, Soto has delivered far above and beyond the slightly more than $1.1MM in salary he has earned over his first two MLB seasons. As Soto enters his age-21 season, the phenom has already hit .287/.403/.535 with 56 homers over 1153 plate appearances, and played a primary role in the Nationals’ 2019 World Series championship. As per Fangraphs’ evaluations, Soto has already delivered $67.9MM worth of production with his 8.5 career fWAR.
The Cardinals’ Jack Flaherty was another young star who took a renewal this spring rather than accepting his club’s terms, and several other notable players (including Mike Trout, Mookie Betts, Carlos Correa, Blake Snell, Josh Hader, and even Soto’s Nats teammate Ryan Zimmerman) have also their pre-arb deals renewed over the years. Flaherty described his decision to turn down the Cards’ offer as a matter of “principle,” and a protest against baseball’s salary structure rather than against his particular team.
As we saw with Trout, Snell, and Zimmerman, contract renewals didn’t lead to hard feelings that prevented those players from signing lucrative multi-year extensions with their teams. There seemingly hasn’t been much news about a potential extension between Soto and the Nationals, though since Soto is controlled through the 2024 season, there isn’t any huge urgency on Washington’s part.
That said, Soto will become arbitration-eligible next winter and is sure to qualify as a Super Two player, so he’ll take four trips through the arb process instead of the usual three. That will only make Soto’s price tag rise even higher if he continues to perform at his elite level, and thus the Nats would certainly have interest in gaining some cost certainty over the young superstar. Scott Boras, Soto’s agent, is usually more likely to advise his clients to test free agency rather than accept an extension, and Soto would potentially be in line for a record-setting contract since he is scheduled to be a free agent in advance of his age-26 season. Boras does have a long history of doing business with the Nationals, however, so it wouldn’t be surprising if a deal was indeed worked out to keep Soto in the District.
newpony13
I think y’all got that plate appearances number wrong. 11153 PA’s is quite a lot for two years lol.
nymetsking
56 HR in that many PAs, kid doesn’t have much power
Andrewf66585
It’s 1153
BloodySox
*153
Tazbk
Pretty much standard. But nothing will be changed until the whole pre-arb/arbitration is renegotiated in the next CBA. One thing is for sure, he will eventually get paid. We saw Cody Bellinger get 10+ mil in his first crack at Arb.
bigwestbaseball
This is the best example of why there should be a strike. Owners completely are winners and to the fault of the horrible players association leadership. Get rid of Tony Clark, he has done nothing for the players.
floridagators
What’s your solution.
Payne Train
He doesn’t have one lol
newpony13
He literally gave you the solution. There should be a strike. If nothing changes, then there should be a second strike. If still no changes, then there should be a third strike, after which the owners will be struck out and forced to sell.
Fuck Me Bitch
If he got $30 million, say, for one great year, say, then the Yankees, The Dodgers, and the Red Sox would be that much richer that much faster than much all the time. No thanks.
Sinhalo75
The players wanted things like bigger lockers and nutritional considerations on the last CBA and salaries were given less consideration. Nothing to do with Clark. I’m sure they’ll come to the table better prepared next CBA.
Ry.the.Stunner
At least the Nats aren’t pathetic enough to fine their player for not being able to come to terms.
gbs42
Are you sure? They don’t exactly make their formulas public.
Ejemp2006
Soto will win MVP. Kieboom will outshine expectations. The Nats won’t miss Rendon much. The elusive repeat is in play. Even if the Dodgers have three players with 10+ WAR.
amk3510
You sound ridiculous, Rendon leaves behind a gaping hole that will not be filled. The Nats got every break in the world last postseason there is no chance that happens again especially with the oldest roster in baseball losing their MVP. Every year we hear about how the champ is going to repeat and it never comes close to happening. Keep drinking the cool aid.
nymetsking
Soto may very well win MVP, but they’ll miss Rendon a while lot more than they missed Harper no matter how good a year Kieboom might put together.
AngelDiceClay
Right. Your Nats got on a good run after a poor start. Much like the 2002 Angels. Plus you caught some breaks in post season. You’re not going to repeat.
Rerand
What breaks exactly were these?
Rerand
What breaks exactly were these?
Ejemp2006
last year’s Nats had a future HOFer and several hall of very good players. 2002 Angels, not so much. Pump the brakes on the comparison.
AngelDiceClay
Okay,have it your way. You’re team will start off like last year and most of your fans will chime in”Dont worry we got off to a bad start in 2019 still plenty of time”
You guys won’t get past the Dodgers.
Ejemp2006
last year’s Nats had a future HOFer and several hall of very good players. 2002 Angels, not so much. Pump the brakes on the comparison.
Mr.Sassypants
And here I thought they were going to DFA him.
nymetsking
They very well might if Williamson beats him out.
Dutch Vander Linde
Dude literally gave them a World Series and this is how they repay him. What’s bad is that MLB lets teams do this kinds of stuff.
floridagators
Congratulations on knowing what a CBA is.
hiflew
They literally gave dude a lot of money. How many 21 year old immigrants are making $629,000 this year? You people act as if these guys need welfare or Gofundme or something. And it’s not like he isn’t going to receive tens, possibly hundreds of millions in a few years anyway.
El Inmate
Well said.
rickoppelt
Immigrant.
didi gregorious nose
Technically he doesnt live here, only works. So immigrant?
hiflew
It’s not even technically. It’s literally what the word means. The man was born in another country and moved here. It’s not an insult or a slur. And I definitely didn’t mean it as an insult. The fact is that if you take away baseball from the equation, guys like Juan Soto would either still be destitute in their home country or would working menial jobs in this country. The reason I included that is that someone like him would be far less likely to have a job paying that much as opposed to a young American kid.
didi gregorious nose
Dude hes a seasonal worker he comes here basically 6 months a year. He rents here in northern Virginia and lives in the dr. He works here naturally has to live here.
didi gregorious nose
I didnt take it as an insult or a slur I gotcha. My point is we dont know Soto’s background for all we know hos parents may have $. See we live here and we have this notion that every 3rd world country is a s**thole and for the most part yes some do. I will tell you this theres plenty of Rich folks
In puerto rico and the Dominican rep. Dont just assume everyone is easting off the floors that’s not the case of everyone.
AngelDiceClay
Angel fans cried when the Angels owner wouldn’t give Trout millions after 2 seasons. Why should he? The CBA is there for owners as well as the players benefit
AngelDiceClay
The team and the player have a CBA. Why would you pay a player more than you’re obligated? Is the player going to give it back if he has a lousy season?
rickoppelt
Agreed
jorge78
He could always hold out…..
Jeff Zanghi
I get the point that guys like Soto and Flaherty are making but like it just seems kind of obnoxious to do this in individual cases. Like the team could technically just pay them the minimum so if they “offer” a raise — why not just take it full well knowing it’s the league not the team that’s set the backwards/wrong system. Like an individual player ‘rejecting’ the offer and having to be ‘renewed’ vs re-signed just seems to be an overly confrontational way to handle the situation with the team. Like unless the team is going to go way out of line and give them big $ for no reason (which would create major chaos and the team would be blackballed by all other organizations) the team’s hands are essentially tied. Yes the system is broken but idk this just feels like a stomping your feet and throwing a tantrum way to handle the situation rather than just sign the “offer” and live with the system the way everyone else in the league has to as well. I’m not saying Soto or any of the other guys are wrong on principle — but idk it just feels kind of like a silly act when there really isn’t much else the team can do without broader changes to the system (which is out of the team’s control)
AngelDiceClay
Whaaaaaat?? If a team wants to give a player in his 2nd year $1M they can. What are they black ball the owner from? What kaos is going to ensue? Arbitration is what drives up the salaries. As long as the team stays within the rules of the CBA they’re ok.
Jeff Zanghi
If one team went rogue and gave their young pre-arbitration star say $3M-$4M… Then there would be a precedent set that all other teams would either have to follow or risk having a rebellion on their hands. Once one team/one player does it… it would turn into a free for all where any team that doesn’t follow suit would have a mutiny on their hands if they didn’t also give their young star millions. So yeah — if a team does it… all of the other owners around the league would be bulls*** with them because it would put all other teams in the impossible position of having to do the same or look like criminals. Not saying the whole system by itself isn’t “criminal” to some extent (that’s an exaggeration the players are still making plenty of $) but you can’t just have one team go rogue and expect there not to be fallout and thus chaos (or kaos as you call it) throughout the league.
Sinhalo75
Actually the White Sox have done that several times the past several years… most notably with Moncada. They even paid guys like Jimenez multi years and millions before even recording their 1st MLB game. So no, “rebellion” is not really a thing in this very precedented matter.
Jeff Zanghi
Yeah but those are contract extensions. That’s completely different… Like it’s not even remotely the same thing. Teams/players are more than able to sign contract extensions at any point during their pre-arb/arb eligible seasons. This isn’t that though… it’s just the pre-extension/pre-arbitration pay rate that a player makes by default. If Soto and the Nats agree to a say, 3-year extension worth $15M for his arbitration years that’s fine — no team would have a problem with it because it’s an actual contract extension. What is being discussed in this article and what I’m talking about is the pre-contract extension salaries. The guys that are set to make the league minimum because they haven’t yet qualified for arbitration and are still playing on rookie contracts. I’m not really sure why there has been so much confusion/disagreement with what I said — it’s pretty basic and self-evident that that 100% is how the whole system works — and “awarding” a player millions of $ — without it being an extension would obviously disrupt the system and cause other teams to be quite upset. it has nothing to do with young players signing extensions — that’s a completely separate thing.
Sinhalo75
No… Tim Anderson has just over 3 years svc time now… he received a multi-year deal with under 1 year svc time a couple seasons ago… they wiped out his minimum salaries and his arb years. Chicago has done this periodically through the years with a number of guys and somehow they hit on the majority of them and chaos has not ensued.
loota.
Batting first Juan Soto
Batting second Juan Soto
Batting third Juan Soto
Batting fourth Juan Soto
Batting fifth? Wait, you guessed it, Juan Soto
Batting sixth is a guy by the name of Juan Soto
Batting seventh Juan Soto
Batting eighth Juan Soto
Batting ninth, and your pitcher for this evening, Juan Soto
jyosuckas
Believe deGrom is another example who turned down the salary and also signed a lucrative deal with his original team
phillyballers
Let’s not act like hes 10 WAR Mike Trout. Couple of nice seasons. He’ll go thru arb or extend just like everyone else.
rickoppelt
Jesus at least pay the kid. Give him 1 million exactly. Give him a reason to feel appreciated. He’s getting paid someday anyways. Unbelievable.
hyraxwithaflamethrower
He’ll get paid someday, but they have literally no reason to pay him more. When he hits FA, would he really stay with the team because they paid him $0.4M more than they had to if another team is offering $20M more in total or gives him the extra year he wants? They’re not doing anything illegal and if the players don’t like the current rule set, they shouldn’t have agreed to it. I believe changes are coming to the CBA, but I don’t blame owners for using contractual clauses to their best benefit. The players do the same.
wordonthestreet
Why pay him more then you have to? In fact doing so just makes his base higher going into his arbitration years.
fljay73
Club has a right under the current CBA but as a player I will take these actions by the club into consideration going forward in future contracts with the club.
hyraxwithaflamethrower
If you were a player, that’d be your right, but really, if your team offered you six years and wouldn’t go above that and another team offered you seven for a similar AAV, would these small gestures really sway you to stay? They might for some players, but I believe those players are in the small minority. Both the owners and players are in it for themselves. All things being equal, these gestures might mean something, but I have to imagine that offers are rarely equal to within $0.4M.
wordonthestreet
No player is taking it into consideration going forward. Give me a break. Every team does it. Its called business. No player is not resigning over that.
nats7
The Nats paid more then they had to for Harper -look what that got them-No loyalty in athletes, all about money.Why else would Steven Strasburg opt out- $26 million per wasn’t enough!He even said he loved the team , the city and the whole atmosphere.
bravesfan
I get the rules but paying him this money is pure robbery.
wordonthestreet
Then you do not understand the rules
Scrap1ron
Speaks for a merit based salary structure over one based on seniority. You produce, you get paid. You don’t produce, you get paid less.
hyraxwithaflamethrower
Neither the players nor the owners would ever go for that. Both want some kind of certainty.
I do think something gets changed in the CBA regarding this, but if I had to guess what, it would be a raising of the minimum salary and, if the players are willing to give up something in exchange, getting to arbitration a year earlier. The biggest change will probably be to playing the service time game. I think if that started half a season in, more teams would bring up guys at the start of the year, especially if they’re looking to compete at all.
msqboxer
Cardinals should just put the Moncada contract in front of him and add $1…Moncada averages out if fulfilled at $15MM annually over the next 6 years.
Dodgerbleu
Dodgers should put it in front of him and add $2. Then the Nats should tell both teams to knock it off.
8
Overpay
No one likes tomatos
Soto is better than acuna
Questionable_Source
There may be some things soto is better at than acuna. Baseball, however, is not among them.
AngelDiceClay
Right there about even. I’d take Acuna
SalaryCapMyth
I would take Acuna but I can see someone arguing for either. They’re both amazing, young talents and it wouldn’t be incorrect to say that the race between these two is neck-n-neck.
deweybelongsinthehall
I’m not worried about the young studs like Soto who will get the money back plus substantially more when he goes through the arb process. minimum salaries for the non young studs that make a roster needs to go up.
SalaryCapMyth
Blows my mind how fans will actually take the side of owners OR players. To these fans I remind you that there is a third side: the fans. These players and owners are fighting over the money we spend. Be on our side and let the millionairse and billionaires fight their own battles.
Bart Harley Jarvis
Sal,
You have my vote! Sal 2020!
AngelDiceClay
Right there about even. I’d take Acuna
Bart Harley Jarvis
He’s going to look great in Phillies pinstripes in 5 years. Patience gentlemen, patience…