While we’ve heard some chatter suggesting the Nationals remain interested in trading for a top-shelf third baseman, Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo downplayed the possibility in comments to assembled media members including Todd Dybas of NBC Sports Washington (Twitter link).
Rizzo didn’t exactly stamp out the possibility of a late-breaking addition. But he certainly poured a bucket of cold water on recent hints that the Nats could still be talking with teams like the Rockies (Nolan Arenado) and Cubs (Kris Bryant).
“We’re not looking to make a trade,” says Rizzo. “It’s nothing that’s been a priority for us in the offseason.”
It would be foolish to assume that those comments are decisive. After all, no executive would fully commit the team’s direction through the media. And Rizzo in particular has acted counter to his public indications in the past.
That said, the Nats’ multiple, smaller veteran infield additions run counter to the concept of a major trade for a third baseman. It’s possible to imagine a reshuffling of the roster that would accommodate a new star player, but the organization might’ve stayed its hand a bit more with its earlier moves if it saw that as a plausible outcome.
As things stand, the D.C. organization will seek to defend its crown by relying upon a gathering of options at third (and second) base. The team hopes that youngster Carter Kieboom can lock up the job in camp, Mark Zuckerman of MASNsports.com writes. Otherwise, it’ll be a matter of mixing and matching. Another inexperienced player, Jake Noll, also has a 40-man spot and could push for a shot with a big spring. Veterans Asdrubal Cabrera, Howie Kendrick, and Starlin Castro all have spent time at the hot corner. Adrian Sanchez and Wilmer Difo will compete for a utility gig with veteran Emilio Bonifacio.
gmenfan
Evan Longoria would look GREAT in a Nats uniform. Sincerely, Giants fans.
korn_cakes33
At what cost?
seanwh01
Victory
ABStract
Hahahaha, nice
pustule bosey
well the giants wouldn’t give up prospects that is for sure – they would however give up money.
tony2bags
Everyone looks great out of a Giants uni
pustule bosey
wow only took 3 comments for someone to bash the giants.
3Rivers
Try being a Pirate fan.
gmenfan
Better than an Astros jersey.
bestno5
Especially with their 3 World Series rings since 2010 and I am not even a giants fan
ABStract
Thank you sir
lowtalker1
Not true. Everyone looks better out of a dodgers jersey.
pustule bosey
*sigh* came here to say that
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
I feel sorry for Longgoria he couldn’t even block a trade to the Giants. Then they didn’t even give him his #3.
ABStract
Yeah, poor guy’s making millions but he can’t have his number?
Cry me a river
Tazbk
Agree with Rizzo. Stupid to make any of those trades when it would have only cost money for Rendon.
SalaryCapMyth
The Nationals blew their load on Strasburg. It’s difficult to see the Nationals spring for TWO $245 million contracts.
retire21
Hope they at least bought him breakfast first. Yikes.
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
Good they have nothing of value to get Kris Bryant.
1738hotlinebling
I think Carter Kieboom and Two prospects would do it
Ejemp2006
Kieboom will win ROY this year and the Nats will make the playoffs with him as a regular. Bryant doesn’t get them that much farther to make a swap necessary.
Nicks Nats
I agree
rondon
…And then he’ll win MVP next year (like Bryant ) and then have a higher 4 year WAR (27) than Rendon, Arenado and Donaldson (like Bryant). But, hey, Bryant wouldn’t help..
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
I’d rather keep KB over an unproven prospect
adc6r
And so you shall
Nicks Nats
I wouldn’t give them Kieboom straight up for him…. not a shot
desertbull
Hahaha….that is why you are not a GM
SalaryCapMyth
No, that’s not true. If they offered to send Kieboom/Robles, the Cubs would take it. I dont think the Nationals would do it but I imagine that would get the job done and that isnt the only way to skin a dog. The Nationals could make it interesting and take on a bad contract plus send Garcia. I bet the Cubs would be over the moon to get Heyward off their payroll.
I know Washington’s OF is full so if not Heyward than another bad contract, but if they wanted Bryant badly enough they could afford him.
No one likes tomatos
I think robles and wil crowe would do it
stevecohenMVP
no way they trade Robles. They arent dumb
realgone2
Trade imminent.
Philliesfan4life
I think Bryant will end up with philly if he lingers on much more, just like with Realmuto last year, philly came out of nowhere to get him
stevecohenMVP
philly has zero impact prospects
jdgoat
Bohm/Howard?
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
That’s it? Gotta add at least 1 more player and maybe a draft pick
Bohn and Howard doesnt get Bryant by a long shot
ForestCobraAL
Realmuto was going to go. We’re talking about the Marlins there.
The Cubs aren’t just going to unload guys for whatever the best offer is.
Philliesfan4life
Kingery or Segura , Stott plus Moniak or Medina I think is a good deal. No way Im trading Howard or Bohm for Bryant yet both of them because there is no way they offer bryant over 300 mill
rondon
Whatever Epstein gets, IF he trades him, will have to include serious young pitching.
Philliesfan4life
Bryant will prolly command around the same type of contract harper got but less in years.
flyerzfan12
I think the Phillies would make Howard untouchable, but Bohm would be a must for the Cubs. I’d love for the Phillies to acquire Bryant without giving up either, but that’s just not realistic.
Segura has very little trade value (I see him yielding a B/C level prospect if on the market). Kingery certainly has value, I’m a big Stott fan, and I still think Moniak has upside and has come to camp ripped this year. Medina’s value has fallen a decent amount unfortunately.
I’d think it takes Bohm, Medina, and another piece.
Philliesfan4life
Im very high on Bohm & Howard , because I think Both of them will be the real deal. Plus Bryant will command about as much as Harper got but less years. Im still upset they let Franco go, I think Dillion would of fixed him, Kapler ruined him.
Philliesfan4life
What if the cubs wanted to trade say , Darvish?
SalaryCapMyth
Do you really think a package like Kingery, Stott and Medina would get the trade done? When I look at the players you are packaging, I don’t see anyone that you would build a trade around that gets a player like Bryant.
Dubplate
I am high on both as well, and I am excited about a future infield of Hoskins, Kingery, Stott, and Bohm.
Nicks Nats
They do want to trade him, but Yu said he’s staying put…. no trade clause
stymeedone
@Forest
Do you mean they will take an offer that’s less than the best? It’s not possible to take an offer that’s better than the best. Or do you mean they will let him walk for nothing but a pick?
ForestCobraAL
The Cubs will put all of their guys back on the field for this season and see what happens. They’re all in their prime. None of them are in their walk year.
Javia
Their pitchers are all well past their primes.
ElectricEddie
Cubs asked for Robles previously and were turned down
He’d look great in CF at Wrigley !
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
Can he lead off? Robles,Kieboom and 1 other top prospect in the Nats top 30 or better. The problem is those two are not pitchers.
So if it happens. He goes to ATL for Anderson, Wright and Wilson or Waters
Buzzed Capra
There’s no way the Nats give up Robles and Kieboom for 2 years of Bryant.
Saint Chris
The Nats already turned down Robles for Bryant. Now you think they’ll include Kieboom AND Robles? I understand the attachment to homegrown players, and Bryant’s a nice player, but he’s not worth what you think he is.
leefieux
The Pirates will send you Column Moran. No return player needed.
Rangers29
Jon Daniels needs to see that the Nats look out, the Phils seem to be out, and the Braves haven’t really discussed anything in a while. GO GET BRYANT! Eat the money, and even maybe take on the Chatwood’s contract with it. Free up some of the Cub’s money so that you can make a deal without giving up as many prospects.
Maybe Cubs / Rangers
Cubs get: Palumbo, Hearns, Winn, and Taveras.
Rangers get: Bryant / Chatwood (All contracts)
Munkes2
Lmao , keep smokin
adc6r
“Wildwood flower grew wild on the farm
but we never kn owed what it was called
Some said it was a flower and
some said it was a weed
I never gave it much thought…”
– Jim Stafford
You old farts know the rest LOL
dpsmith22
Rizzo is a terrible gm, but he’s right on this one. they don’t need a 3rd basemen.
Ashtem
How is he terrible when he got them a WS?
920kodiak
He’s not a terrible GM, but he has always struggled at building a quality bullpen from year to year. Always has to deal prospects in July to fix the pen. However, winning it all erases any past sins.
joepaut
Rizzo is thought as one of the best in the business. “Terrible”…..He just won the MLB Executive of the Year Award…right after he won the World Series…and the Nats have been contenders for the better part of a decade. One of the best records.
angelsfan4life
La Stella for a solid prospect
desertbull
If Im the Cubs I ask for Turner and either Kieboom or Robles.
Nothing less. If they say no its ok. They don’t have to trade him.
Buzzed Capra
They’ll be saying no.
mlbnyyfan
Okay let’s make a deal Andujar and Frazier for Corbin
Munkes2
Hate to break it to ya Nats but you don’t have anything to get Bryant outside of Robles ++++, and youre not giving him up so nothing else will pull a deal for ya.
Rangers fans defiantly wishful thinking they have absolutely nothing , and the dorks thinking taking chatwood to clear payroll with Bryant just have no clue..
Cubs arent making any moves to just shed money
920kodiak
…and, so, I guess that is that.
Nicks Nats
Hate to break it to you, but the Cubs can’t wait to jettison Bryant…. Robles and Kieboom are off the table, the Cubs can’t find a buyer and they’ll settle for a couple no names
rondon
Earth to Nicks Nats- No one has less credibility than a homer.
920kodiak
Would it be the worst option in the world to keep the few prospects you have and just let Kieboom try to win the job?
Saint Chris
That is the best plan. And the Nats have Cabrera, Castro, and Kendrick as insurance if Kieboom falters.
brucenewton
Nats have 46 infielders already.