A quick word of update on Angels outfielder Jo Adell, who has been turning heads in the Arizona Fall League–which isn’t to say that eyes weren’t already trained on him to begin with. After a 2019 season that saw Adell hit .289/.359/.475 with ten home runs across three levels and 341 plate appearances, the Kentucky native entered AFL play last month as MLB Pipeline’s 5th-ranked prospect in the game. As Kyle Glaser of Baseball America points out this morning, Adell is bolstering that pedigree with his most recent performance for the Mesa Solar Sox (link).
The 20-year-old Adell, who was selected 10th overall by Los Angeles in the 2017 draft, went 7-for-17 in AFL play last week with a home run and a balanced 5-to-3 strikeout-to-walk ratio. Adell reached as high as Triple-A in the Los Angeles system in 2019, although the team may want to see him improve upon the production he posted there in a small sample of 130+ plate appearances (to say nothing of the potential service time considerations involving a prospective star such as Adell). With outfielder Kole Calhoun a possibility to move on in free agency, there does figure, at least, to be some MLB opportunity for the youngster in 2020 when GM Billy Eppler deems him ready.
More from around the AL this Monday morning…
- A sad note of remembrance in recognition of the passing of Orioles organizational fixture Andy Etchebarren, who died this weekend at age 76. Etchebarren, an All-Star in his rookie season of 1966, was an important part of Baltimore’s mid-century dynasty. Perhaps most notably, the backstop helped catch, along with Elrod Hendricks, the Orioles’ four 20-game winners of 1971; it’s probably not un-noteworthy that the man known as “Etch” was also the last man to ever record an at-bat against Dodgers legend Sandy Koufax. After his playing career, as noted in a post from MASN’s Roch Kubatko (link), Etchebarren carved out a nice career for himself as a coach in the Baltimore pipeline, including stints as manager of the club’s Triple-A and Double-A affiliates, and time spent as the bench coach for former manager Davey Johnson.
- The site has already thoroughly explored the ongoing contract outlook for Red Sox superstar Mookie Betts. To recap, the club’s forthcoming CBT trapeze act, Betts’ impending arbitrational raise, and the player’s apparent ambivalence to signing an extension with the team have all coalesced to the point where the near-unthinkable–a trade involving the near-peerless Betts–may be a consideration this offseason. One factor that won’t figure into Betts status for 2020? Organizational tension. As noted in a piece from Chris Cotillo of Masslive.com, the four executives* in charge of Sox operations in the wake of the Dave Dombrowski firing–including assistant GM Eddie Romero–are not holding Betts’ businesslike approach to negotiation against him (link). “I think he’s doing what’s in the best interest of Mookie and I think that’s what athletes should do,” Romero told Cotillo. “Every situation of these is case-by-case. Mookie has been the one who has sacrificed his body and has put in the work. He has the right to decide what he wants to do.” In addition to Romero, team president Sam Kennedy and chairman Tom Werner both comment in Cotillo’s piece on their faith in Betts as both a person and a player, and Romero goes as far as to say that the player has “earned” the right to hit free agency. While this dialogue could just be seen as an encouraging bit of rationality in the front office realm, it is fair to wonder, for those reading tea leaves, whether such a congenial atmosphere could be foreshadowing to an amicable parting of ways between player and team.
*An earlier version of this post mistakenly referred to “four men” running the baseball operations department, when in fact the group of four executives is made up of one woman (Raquel Ferreira) and three men (Eddie Romero, Zack Scott, and Brian O’Halloran). We regret the error.
dlevin11
Trade Mookie to San Diego for prospects. They have #1 ranked farm system in MLB. He can play with Machado. Also Red Sox will not have to face Mookie that much.
Bennybosox
Sure. Mookie for Renfroe, Yates, Quantrill, and Urias…I’d hate to see him leave the Sox but that would be an adequate return
trident
For a one year rental? That’s nuts.
ChiSoxCity
That’s Boston fans for you.
Bennybosox
I’m just going by recent reports on what the organization is seeking in a potential trade- an outfielder that can step into the lineup in 2020 (preferably with some affordable team control), a mid-rotation starter, and two “top-100” overall prospects…Refrore fits the bill, Yates is obviously a closer and not a starter but they have a hole there. And while Quantrill & Urias have exhausted their prospect eligibility, each could step in and fill significant holes on the 2020 roster on the cheap. Sliding Quantrill into the #5 spot in the rotation provides some upside without costing any money and Urias fills a Dustin Pedroia sized hole that’s been plugged with part-time players for the last two years. And I don’t think it’s too much to ask for the Red Sox. San Diego is looking for an immediate turn around and is probably gonna go hard after Cole or Strasburg, and probably walk away from free agency with one of Ryu, Wheeler, or MadBum if they can’t land either of those two. They have some depth i their farm system and they’re not giving up Gore or Abrams or Patino or Trammell in this proposed scenario. They could go all in for one year with a trade like this and not compromise the future direction of the franchise
Ace of Diamonds
not going to happen
twinsfan368
That’s too much take out Yates and replace Urias with a lower level prospect that’s probably what they’re looking for
mcmillankmm
Can’t imagine Renfroe, Quantrill, and a low-end prospect would be of any interest to Boston this fall/winter
Ketch
That trade is too much given the values on baseballtradevalues.com. But the Padres’ farm and young talent does make them an ideal trading candidates, especially if – and I have ZERO information about this – they would like to unload a few prospects to avoid a 40 man roster crunch and lose good prospects to the Rule 5 Draft. (Little help, Padres’ fans?). But this site suggests Betts for Adrian Morejon, Franchy Cordero, and Michel Baez is equal for both sides. If there is a bidding war, the Sox might be able to get a bit more from San Diego. If…
Bruin1012
The value of prospects has gone sky high and my guess is the Red Sox hold onto Mookie. Unless a team is going to give at the least a high end pitching prospect and another quality outfield prospect I don’t care what baseball trade values says the Red Sox simply aren’t going to trade Mookie. There is quite a bit of value in going for it again next year with Mookie and seeing what happens.
grittyshaker
It’d be a big mistake if the Sox hold on to Mookie. He definitely wants to test the FA market and it’d be a terrible shame if he walks away and the Sox get a draft pick in return. They have the lineup to compete even without him. They are in desperate need of pitching prospects and I’d be shocked if they don’t go after one for Betts.
Bruin1012
The thing is the Red Sox aren’t just going to give him away. If they can’t get get a couple of blue chip prospects it’s worth it to hold onto him and see how they play. They can always trade him at the deadline where someone may overpay for that final piece of the puzzle. My point is the Red Sox aren’t going to trade just to trade him you aren’t getting Mookie for three or four of your also rans and if that is all that is offered you hold onto him.
ShieldF123
This is not the early 2000’s. I can’t imagine anyone trading 2 blue chip prospects for 1 year of Betts let alone one half.
Balk
Why would San Diego want a 1 year rental? Then again who knows, maybe they think they can extend him, bad move if they can’t!
cookmeister 2
Adell will start in AAA and come up when he is ready. I’d be fine with rolling out Goodwin in right until that time.
AngelDiceClay
Around May the earliest
downeysoft420
I’d even argue not till September call ups given his age, and seems about time the angles made a wiser decision for the future and not rush him up and give him plenty of time down there instead of pushing the team earlier.
angels fan 3
What kind of angles we talking ?
angelsinthetroutfield
Clearly obtuse
Vizionaire
sox brass is all out to paint betts in gold.
YankeesBleacherCreature
I think they’re being refreshingly honest about Betts’ situation. He’s not a player that needs any sales pitch if they do plan to trade him as an expensive one-year rental. The media is trying to paint a false picture of frustration from concerned parties.
Vizionaire
his splits home/away. at fenway, he is a candidate to be a mvp. away from home park, he is a good player. all star? yes but not much more.
HubcapDiamondStarHalo
How much more than an all star do you want?
deweybelongsinthehall
Why wouldn’t they? Mookie hold the cards by not inviting further negotiations. To say anything negative would either cause a rift between the team and Mookie or lower his trade value.
RicoD
I won’t be a no-brainer for a team to give up prospects to take on Mookie for 1 yr/$28ish mm. There are not many teams 1 piece away from making a run. The Phillies come to mind, maybe Padres, not much more than that.
ShieldF123
Padres are a hell of a lot more than 1 piece away. They finished below .500
ForestCobraAL
” the Los Angeles system”
That means the Dodgers.
The Angels are in Anaheim or you can call them the O.C. Angels but they do not play in or near Los Angeles. On a typical day during the week it takes at least an hour to get from the Angels park to the center of Los Angeles. On the weekend it would take over two hours.
It’s like the Mets moving to Trenton, New Jersey and calling themselves the New York Mets of Trenton.
Ironman_4life
Like the San Francisco 49ers of Santa Clara
RicoD
correct, the Giants and Jets playing in East Rutherford NJ and still being called New York teams. The OC angels is not as appealing I guess.
ForestCobraAL
NO
Not East Rutherford, Trenton.
Big difference.
Vizionaire
brooklyn is not in n.y. city. rays is in st. petersburg. what an unintelligent post! besides, angels are the original los angeles team!
ForestCobraAL
Brooklyn is one of the five boroughs of New York City.
Vizionaire
still, its address is not brooklyn, n.y., n.y. it is simply brooklyn, n.y.
ocsportsgeek
As a proud OC resident for 30+ years, you’re right.
At the same time, WHY are people STILL talking about this? My god…
Anaheim Angels. California Angels. This take is just sooooo tired. Can we all move on?
trout27
Or the Giant and Jets playing in the Meadowlands and calling them New York.
deweybelongsinthehall
Teams that come to mind assuming they do not win the WS in 2019: Phillies, Dodgers, Giants and Mets. To a lesser extent, the White Sox, Twins and Braves.
CrewBrew
Theres no way id trade for Mookie unless he agrees to an extension upon the trade, which is highly unlikely. Unless a team is looking to go all in for one season and make a WS run, it makes no sense to acquire someone who clearly is interested in testing the open market while mortgaging your future.
mcmillankmm
If Betts signed an extension as part of a trade then you have to assume that team is dealing away their top 3 prospects at a minimum
Bennybosox
Absolutely. Some team is gonna step up and give them a haul in a 1 year rental scenario. But very few teams can probably afford to do it knowing that it’s all or nothing for just a single season. If he agrees to an extension you’d have to figure 28 teams are gonna be in on that and the price changes drastically
CrewBrew
i just dont see him agreeing to anything now. Hes so close to FA and im curious what hes going to get offered. After last off-season, and watching the two big free agent bats not help their team into the playoffs, i wonder if the 300 million dollar contract will be offered.
CrewBrew
yes clearly. I stated IF he agrees to an extension as part of the trade. But for a one year rental, no i would hold onto my pieces if I was the Padres/Braves since they seem to have the most to offer.
deweybelongsinthehall
The unasked question that could materialize is will Mookie go to the team and ask fo a trade to a specific team. Does he want to return closer to his Tennessee home for example? He’s said all the neutral things so far but he could try to speed things up by a year.
TheGreatBaseballMind
Completely agree with you, Mr. CrewBrew.
jorge78
Good points Crew Brew but the Padres are desperate to win next year and they have prospects they will lose in the Rule 5 draft if they can’t make room on the 40 man roster. A perfect storm…..
dfree123
Get over it. Yes we know the Angels don’t actually play in the city of Los Angeles. The majority of their fans would prefer them to be called the Anaheim Angels. I hate listening to people complain about their name. It’s a dumb name yes, but there’s nothing you or I can do about it and it’s likely not going to change so whining about it won’t do any good.
ForestCobraAL
No one writing about the Angels has to refer to them as Los Angeles. You can call them Anaheim in print or on TV. Nothing Moreno can do about that.
DanielDannyDano
Trade Mookie for Jo Adell
dymez17
Yes
jdgoat
Every team not named Milwaukee and San Diego screwed up by passing on Adell.
Ketch
And every team screwed up by passing on Betts at least 4 times…
jdgoat
Yep. Happens all the time. Just saying though, Adell is going to be a stud.
its_happening
Keston seems to be working out fine for Milwaukee. Gore might work out for SD. Too soon to tell.
Later in that round the Blue Jays selected Logan Warmoth. Could have went with Jeter Downs instead. Can we say the Jays screwed that up or is that being too negative?
Baseballdave
Do NOT trade Mookie Betts !! SIGN him long term !!!
soxfan4381
No, his contract will be another bad contract the Sox doesn’t need.
GMB 883
The SD trade is not too much of Mookie would agree to a long term contract but it does not appear that will happen and SD did that last year (long term deal) with Machado so they are not likely to do it again. A lessor trade could work but I don’t think Mookie will stay in SD. He wants to be closer to home so they say and that’s Tenn. so maybe Atlanta, Houston or the Rangers. Should be interesting or maybe Boston makes him an offer he can’t refuse and they let JD opt out and sign someone like Edwin Encarnacion for a lot less. He will likely be a FA w/ a $20M option the Yankees are not likely to pick up.
jdgoat
And just for the sake of well, what happened, Jeter Downs was not projected to be a first rounder or be picked ahead of Warmoth by any of the outlets pre-draft, and was selected by the Reds where he would take an under-slot deal…. just to let you know that. Don’t take that the wrong way though bud.
its_happening
Outlets aren’t making draft day decisions. Front offices are. Simply had to point out how ignorant, after the fact, your comment was about Milwaukee and SD “passing” on Adell. Then hypocritically giving the Blue Jays a pass as usual.
jorge78
Etchebarren! The Brow!
RIP Andy…..
g8752
The press hangs on each word on Mookie. What have we gained by knowing Mookie has the right to do what is best for Mookie and The Red Sox the same? Did anyone ever think otherwise?
g8752
Perhaps each side needs to say they love each other and hope to work it out. lol.
123redsox
Betts to Atlanta! Betts is from the South and is rumored to be willing to discuss an extension with them. The braves have the cap room and need for another star to put them over the top. Betts fits their timeline too. Also, the braves have the prospects, numerous cost controlled starters and could exercise markakis’ option and send him to play right field in Boston
Bruin1012
Haven’t heard any rumors that Betts would be willing to talk an extension with anyone. Betts seems determined to test free agency. Obviously if he was willing to sign a long term contract with Atlanta then one if their outfielders Pache or Waters and then a high end prospect Arm would be what I would look for but he isn’t going to sign an extension so it’s a moot point.
KD17
If Betts refuses to sign a contract this off=season then I think we need to do something that will help the team more than just moving him for prospects.
I say we package him with Price to the Dodgers now that they have failed in an early playoff round. Heads need to roll out there or at least things need to be shaken up a bit so why not pick up a superstar right-handed OF bat and a former Cy Young winner for 4 young prospects and make a run at the WS in 2020?.
Here is the deal that I think would help both teams:
Red Sox trade Mookie and Price
Dodgers trade Lux (we’ll play him at 2B), Andrew Toles (back from injury is an excellent CFer who hits), Verdugo (replace Betts in RF) and Gonsolin or May (Starting Right handed pitcher).
Not asking for their top prospects just four controllable guys with skills good enough to play right now. We cut over $60M a year from our payroll and add next to nothing. This gives us money to get a closer and another Starter (or maybe wait a year for Cole).
Our 2020 team would be::
Vasquez at C
Devers at 3B
Bogey at SS
Lux at 2B
Chavis at 1B
Benny in LF
Toles in CF
Verdugo in RF
JD as DH
Holt, Travis and M Hernandez as the utility players
Sale, Eovaldi, E-ROD and the LA SP are the starters.
Walden and Weber are long relief
Taylor and Hernandez are the lefty bullpen
Barnes and Workman are the righty bullpen
We pick up two free agents with the extra money:
CLOSER
Starting Pitcher
This trade wouldn’t be a possibility if LA hadn’t lost without getting to the NLCS. This trade would help LA ownership show they are even more committed to winning a WS. We reduce payroll by $60M and we have a younger team. That gives the new GM room to work.
I think Price is the albatross contract that creates all our issues related to payroll. So I”ve been trying to figure out ways to get rid of it without eating parts of it. There are only two players that are valued highly enough to couple with Price to try and move him. Betts and Devers. Devers salary would make more sense to ensure we don’t eat any of Price’s contract but Betts offers a MVP caliber player and Price is a former Cy Young winner who have won a WS. The Dodgers are so deep that you wouldn’t be touching many of their controlled players like Bellinger, Muncy, Buehler, Kolarek or Urias. Yes it would raise their payroll allot but they are buying two star players and making room in their outfield since they have too many. Betts isn’t an injury prone kind of guy so he would give them some consistency in the OF. The LA line-up would be:
C – Barnes/Smith
1B – Muncy
2B – Taylor
SS – Seager
3B – Turner
LF = Pederson
CF – Bellinger
RF= Betts
SP1 – Buehler
SP2 – RYU
SP3 – Kershaw
SP4 – Price
SP5 – Hill/Stripling/Urias
Closer – Jansen
The reason this should have appeal in LA is that the Price portion is short-term and helps them stay competitive now but rolls off as their young pitchers mature to replace him. This gives them a chance to lock-up Betts and Bellinger long-term.
I’m not sure where else we could trade Price to with any hope of having them pick up the entire cost of the contract and like I said, without Mookie or Devers there would not be an incentive.
I want Betts to sign a contract this off season that gives a chance to get under the cap to reset the penalties and then gives him what he wants beginning in 2021. So, $22M in 2020 and then $33M in 2021 through 2030 with opt out options after 2024. We can get under the cap and reset the penalties by simply cutting players like Pearce and JBJ because enough falls off the books in 2020 but we’d still be in a tight situation until the Price contract ends.
its_happening
Before posting this you should have run the payroll numbers for the Dodgers. They will not trade for Price and Betts unless Boston is willing to give them salary relief. The 4 players you included from LA make very little. Your idea pushes LA’s payroll around $230 million for 2020. That means LA would never touch this move unless Boston takes AJ Pollock at the very least.
Better to choose a team with some salary flexibility to make a deal like that (Minnesota, Atlanta).
prov356
With Goodwin now and Adell later, I think the Angels will buy out Calhoun and free up $14m for pitching.
SG
Can’t see wasting too much on “any” player that doesn’t want to sign with you and isn’t eager and upbeat to do so.
It takes your mind and energy away from other important tasks.
I also truly believe that FA players that command large long term contracts are not usually good for the team.
With the possible exception of picking one up at the trade deadline for little of nothing other than getting their payroll off of the dumping teams books and hopefully helping your team down the stretch run and the playoffs.
I also would have “no” intention of keeping that player at the end of the season.
Let them shine and go off and find another suitor next season.
It reduces the baggage, the prima dona effect and next years payroll thus allowing you to have the money to spend on young player drafting and development and for the personnel that acquire and develop that talent.
g8752
Yes, it’s foreshadowing an amicable parting on Betts. Especially targeting his fans.