With less than a day to go before the 2019 amateur draft, the Orioles seem to still be exploring their options with the first overall pick. Oregon State catcher Adley Rutschman has long been considered the top talent in this year’s draft class by scouts and pundits, though according to MLB.com’s Jim Callis and Jonathan Mayo, the Orioles are also looking at Cal first baseman Andrew Vaughn and Vanderbilt outfielder J.J. Bleday as “the top two alternatives” if Rutschman doesn’t end up being the pick (plus, high schooler Bobby Witt Jr. also might be a possibility).
Two scouts on rival teams have told Mayo that the Orioles won’t select Rutschman, though Mayo notes, this could also be some of the gamesmanship every team deploys to create uncertainty about their selections. Still, Baltimore’s front office hasn’t given any indication about their plans in Mike Elias’ first draft as the team’s GM, and the linking of Rutschman to the O’s was more based on Rutschman’s high profile than it was on any reports coming out of Camden Yards.
A wealth of factors go into any draft pick, of course, especially one as important and potentially franchise-altering as a 1-1 selection. It’s worth remember that Elias was the Astros’ director of amateur scouting when the team made the then-surprising move to select Carlos Correa with the first overall pick of the 2012 draft. Mark Appel was widely tabbed as the top prospect of the 2012 class, though since Correa was willing to sign for a lesser bonus than the recommended slot price attached to the first overall pick, Correa ended up being the choice, giving the Astros more space in their draft pool to sign Lance McCullers Jr. for a larger bonus in the supplemental first round (41st overall).
We haven’t heard much about what Rutschman or some of this year’s top prospects are seeking in their first contracts, though if Vaughn or Bleday are willing to sign for less than the first overall pick’s recommended $8,415,300 slot price, that certainly be a point in their favor should Elias again look to spread his bonus pool money around on several top prospects.
Beyond just finances, of course, the O’s could also simply prefer Vaughn, Bleday, Witt, or another player to Rutschman for pure baseball reasons. The Astros received some criticism for being cheap when they took Correa over Appel, though time has clearly vindicated Houston’s strategy in that draft.
If Rutschman isn’t the top pick, it could greatly shake up the remainder of the first round. As a matter of due diligence, teams scout virtually all of the top prospects to prepare for just such an unexpected scenario, plus other teams could also be preparing to make outside-the-box situations. Callis and Mayo cite a number of interesting prospects within their piece, including an item on how high school third baseman Brett Baty’s stock could be on the rise, potentially to the Rangers (who have the #8 pick) or even the White Sox with the third overall choice. Vaughn, Baty, Bleday, and high schooler CJ Abrams have all been mentioned as being on Chicago’s radar, though these plans could again change should Rutschman or Witt be available when the White Sox are on the clock.
GarryHarris
C Danny Goodwin was drafted 1st overall twice. 1971 ChiSox, 1975 Angels. He never lived up to the hype.
Ully
to be fair, they had multiple drafts in one year.
Ronk325
Any competent front office would look at this draft class and know that Rutschman is the only logical choice to take first. When you’re in as bad of shape as the Orioles who are looking at a 4-5 year rebuild you have to take the clear cut top player
thecoffinnail
It’s not that simple when they could select someone else and save a few million which they could then use in a later round to entice a high school player to skip college. The Orioles are in horrible shape and one player fast tracking through the minors isn’t going to do them much good when they could just as easily add 2-3 very good but not great prospects for the same money. I really think they should go that route and look for a can’t miss college player 2-3 years down the road when their window is closer. It’s also safer. Who knows, Rutschman could be the next Appel or Tim Beckham. He could also turn out great but he will probably fly through the minors and the Orioles will burn up all of his pre-arb years waiting on other prospects to develop.
kahnkobra
right on
Ronk325
I see where you’re coming from but Rutschamn is clearly the top player in this class and he plays the most premium position in the game. He likely won’t make his big league debut till late 2021 or early 2022 at which point the Orioles could have a well stocked farm system and be on their way to being contenders. At that point they should have a couple core members in place before the next wave of talent joins the big league team. Just look at the Cubs and Astros as models for properly going through a long rebuild
jbigz12
You control a guy for 6-7 years after his big league debut. A debut which will not come for at least another year and a half if not longer. If you don’t think you will have put a contender on the field within a 6 year timeframe there’s serious issues with your rebuild. That shouldn’t even be a consideration. The orioles will need a lot more talent coming thru the pipeline obviously but there are guys there and Rutschman could realistically be under orioles control for the next 9+ seasons including minor league time. Absolutely no reason to avoid the hands down top guy in the class to try and bait a couple HS guys later. That doesn’t make sense with a true #1
mstrchef13
I might agree if the O’s had more picks, but they do not. They have no compensation picks and their competitive balance pick is in the 70s, so there aren’t a lot of extra picks to do financial shenanigans with. They need to take Rutschman. He’s the safest pick, and the team now needs talent. The only alternative is Witt. The other guys being talked about are not metric-friendly players.
Gocubsgo1986
Less than 24 hours for the orioles to screw this up
RunDMC
This was my first thought when I read this. This is the easiest decision since Cal Ripken Sr. had to turn in the batting order with who is playing SS.
thestripedtaco
The biggest issue with Vaughn I keep hearing is the number of 1b/DH only players the O’s already have. If that’s the biggest issue people have with him and he ends up being the best hitter overall in the draft (while likely signing somewhat significantly underslot) that dosent sound like the worst outcome in the world. This is coming from someone who has purely been on the Adley or bust train up until this point. I kind of feel like trusting the rocket scientist and his friend the GM on this one O’s fans.
Dustin Michels
One thing to throw out there is Baltimore is one of kind on medicals and injuries and there could be a small concern regarding AR out there and where most teams are not worried the Orioles in the past are sticklers on things like this.
Priggs89
Unless Baty is going to sign significantly under slot, I don’t see the appeal at #3 overall. He’s an old high schooler that’s probably going to end up a first baseman. There will be better prospects available.
the guru
Please orioles take Vaughn. Please please.
ASapsFables
As a White Sox fan, hopefully history will repeat with Mike Elias and Adley Rutschman falls to Chicago at #3. The White Sox have been linked to 1B Andrew Vaughn and prep SS C.J. Abrams but is most in need of a long term solution at the catching position as they complete their rebuild.
It’s too bad that MLB doesn’t have a provision to trade up in their amateur draft like the NFL and NBA. If it did the White Sox along with many other clubs would surely be on speed dial with the Orioles for a chance at this draft’s consensus top prospect.
jdgoat
Agreed, it would make trades more interesting. Too much going on with slot values though and there might be too many cheap teams who trade picks for money.
ASapsFables
MLB is looking for ways to make its game more appealing to sports fans. Allowing trades in their amateur draft certainly wouldn’t hurt those chances and also make the event more fascinating. A team like the White Sox would have an opportunity to move up and fill a need while one like the Orioles who are further back in their rebuild would have an opportunity to stockpile more draft picks now and in future years to say nothing of teams also willing to deal MLB talent for more prospect capital.
Zach725
Rutschman has 4 grade 60 tools. Vaughn may end up as a similar hitter, but Rutschman plays a premium position. I think you have to take him.
ASapsFables
If the White Sox stick to their public statement of taking the best player available at #3 (670thescore.radio.com/white-sox-number-3-pick-amat…) regardless of position and according to their board then that should put to rest some of the recent rumors out there that they may consider grabbing a cheaper prospect in order to have more allocated pool dollars for later picks. The million dollar question is what exactly does their board look like?
Clearly Oregon State University catcher Adley Rutschman would be at the top as he is with virtually everyone. It’s also a pretty safe bet that Rutschman will go the the Orioles at #1 while prep SS Bobby Witt Jr. is an even better lock to the Royals at #2. So how does the White Sox board lineup after Rutschman and with Witt going to KC? Where exactly do California University 1B Andrew Vaughn and Georgia high school SS C.J. Abrams rank in the White Sox pecking order?
Hopefully the baseball gods will provide some divine intervention and have the Orioles select someone other than Rutschman with the idea that Baltimore will have additional funds later in the draft. It’s not out of the realm of possibility that the Orioles may not want to allocate their first round slotted amount of $8,415,300 to a college player when they are a long way from becoming competitive in the AL East. They have a total pool amount of $13,821,300 in which to spend on their first 10 picks and may want to spread it out on younger prep stars with high ceilings who have college scholarship offers as leverage. This scenario might leave Rutscham available to the White Sox who are in a better position to compete sooner than the Orioles or Royals.
Here is the breakdown of pool dollars for each MLB team for the 2019 Rule Draft: mlb.com/news/2019-mlb-draft-pools-and-bonus-values
extreme113
Bobby Heck was the Scouting Director who drafted Carlos Correa.
Elias first two first rounders were Mark Appel/2013 (out of baseball) and Brady Aiken/2014 (didn’t sign).
Bt5201
Exactly. I don’t understand how this keeps getting mis-represented.
NuckBobFutting
The O’s have to take Rutschman don’t they? They have so many 1B/DH guys with Mancini probably needing to get out of the OF, Mountcastle on the verge of being up, Nunez could be with the way he’s swinging, and of course Crush Davis. They also have a ton of OF with Stewart, Diaz, Hays, McKenna to not take Bleday.
bobtillman
Enough with the “save money for that prepster later in the draft”….that almost NEVER works out.
AR can play defensively right now, today. And, rather than melting in the spotlight of advanced competition like Witt, he’s thrived. I’ve watched a ton of tape on the kid; I used to think his ceiling was Matt Wieters. Nah, his FLOOR is Matt Wieters;
This is a guy whose better than the hype. It’s insane for the O’s to look anywhere else. The physical tools are there; the makeup and baseball IQ are off the charts. Nothing against the other guys (especially Vaughn, whose going to be very good). But it’s a poor draft; it’s AR and a cast of thousands.
Idioms for Idiots
The Sox better not get cute and stupid by trying to get a HS kid under slot value at #3. Picking that high, go with what looks like a sure thing, and you’re talking 4, maybe 5 or 6, guys: AR, Witt, Vaughn, Abrams, maybe Bleday or even Greene. Personally, I have only 3 guys on my list at #3: AR, Witt, Vaughn. Sox grab the guy not picked by the O’s and KC. To me, it’s that simple.
The Sox are closer to filling up their future roster. 2B Madrigal, SS TA, 3B Moncada, C/1B Collins (more likely 1B), OF Jimenez & Robert, and possibly DH if they keep Abreu. That’s 7 if they keep Abreu. That leaves C/1B (AR or Vaughn) and the 3rd OF, which they have a few good prospects headed by Basabe and Adolfo, but none look to be sure things. The 3rd OF could be a vet via trade/FA. Same goes with C if Collins doesn’t pan out at C and AR doesn’t fall in their lap. As for SP, Lodolo is the best prospect, but nowhere near the offensive guys listed above. So, it makes even more sense to grab AR or Vaughn to fill one of these remaining holes, but if it’s Witt or Abrams, I could live with that since they are both top echelon prospects.
It would be a little different if the Sox were where the O’s, KC, Detroit, and Miami are in with their rebuild. Then maybe it’s not a horrible idea to get cute and sign a below slot value guy to save money for later in the draft (and I still wouldn’t do it that high). But the Sox are much closer to the finish line in the rebuild than those teams. And it would also be different if the Sox were picking, say, 10th. Then you can get cute with below slot value singing, but not at #3 overall.
I know, you never know how these guys will pan out, but in the position the Sox are in, you have to go with what looks like the sure thing. Don’t get cute and stupid, Hahn, do the right thing!
Idioms for Idiots
Good, Hahn made the right choice with Vaughn. Too bad AR couldn’t fall to the Sox, but the O’s did what they were supposed to do, unfortunately LOL.
bobtillman
You never know how these guys will pan out is because natural “gifts” are just a PART of the equation, and may not even be the most important part. The player himself, and the selecting team’s player development system, may very well be the larger contributors. Do the Astros draft exceptionally? Or do they develop exceptionally? Or do they pick players who are thirsty to succeed, rather than the kid who puts his bonus in his pocket and thinks he’s “made it”. I suspect it’s a combination of all three.
MANY MLB teams are still in the universe where you hire minor league coaches/managers based on how well they kiss the Farm Director’s backside. Hiring a failure to “coach” outstanding athletes is a bit like hiring an alcoholic flop to guard the Hope Diamond. Sure, it’s cheap….it’s also a recipe for failure.
Draft Day is like that little old lady schoolmarm who told you that high school graduation is called “commencement”, because it’s the beginning, not the end. The old broad was right.
AR’s best quality might be that he masks an unbelievable desire to achieve and work ethic with an affable nature. Trout does that; Betts does that; Kershaw does that. He could very well be in that class.
mgrap84
From what i hear is Adley is going to be like Harper in where he was a C but moved to the outfield. We have a ton of competition in the OF but Sisco is also still young and is coming along pretty well. That being said you clearly go with the best player in the draft with the number 1 pick. I trust Elias, i mean look what he did with the Astros and their drafts. They all turned out pretty damn good.
OsStrohsNattyBohs
The Orioles have a great history with drafting switch hitting catchers (Wieters, Cisco), what could go wrong???
bobbleheadguru
Tigers are in the “no think” position.
There is a consensus Top 5, then a drop off.
Just pick the left over.
No one will second guess them and they might get lucky.