Avisail Garcia is destroying much of what he’s being thrown by Major League pitchers. After striding to the plate 208 times, he has an even .300 batting average, 11 dingers, and a healthy 138 wRC+. That’s awfully good value for the Rays, who paid him all of $3.5MM for one season of work.
There’s a reason they got Garcia for that amount: his substandard, injury-filled 2018 season, at the end of which he was non-tendered by the White Sox. It really didn’t come as a surprise when the South Siders cut bait and the Tampa Bay org picked up Garcia for less than half his projected arbitration salary.
The past is the past, so far as the Rays are concerned. What matters right now is that Garcia is seeing red and putting his contract in the black. But what happens when he returns to the open market this coming winter? We’ve still got a lot of plate appearances to watch, but what if he keeps up something like his current pace?
It isn’t as if he hasn’t done it before. Back in 2017, Garcia carried a .330/.380/.506 slash over 561 plate appearances — good for a 137 wRC+ that’s a near match for his current output. Then again, he leaned on a whopping .392 batting average on balls in play to reach that number, which plummeted back to .271 in the ensuing season while he tried to play through a hamstring injury. And he had posted underwhelming numbers previously. Garcia doesn’t stand out at all in terms of plate discipline, with roughly average strikeout numbers (despite huge swinging-strike rates) and slightly below-average walk rates for his career.
When he’s hot, he’s hot … not/not. Is that all there is to it? Should teams be wary of putting too much stock in his current upswing? Perhaps. The K/BB numbers are in line with his personal mean. There were some lean years in the past. Then again, it’s not as if there aren’t any changes worthy of attention in Garcia’s profile.
Statcast has picked up on quite a few interesting observations. Garcia is putting the barrel on the ball more than about nine in ten of his peers. He carries a healthy and career-best 46.5% hard-hit rate. His average exit velo is up to 91.4 mph after sitting just over 90 for the prior three seasons. Put it together, and Statcast actually thinks Garcia has been unlucky, crediting him with a .392 xwOBA that exceeds his .379 wOBA.
Garcia is doing things a bit differently than in the past. He’s putting the ball in the air more often than ever, with a launch angle that sits at 11.1 degrees after a third-straight year-over-year gain. His 1.24 GB/FB rate is by far the lowest of his career. (The leaguewide reduction in sinkers is likely playing a role, as Garcia is suddenly seeing half as many as he had before.) The flies are flying quite nicely, too. Just 2.0% are harmlessly dropping into infielders’ gloves, while 20+% are going over the outfield wall (about the same rate as they did for him last year).
There’s no question: Garcia is an increasingly interesting upcoming free agent asset. Garcia is enjoying a lofty .346 BABIP, but that’s not an outlandish number — particularly for a player who owns a .331 career mark. He’s even trending up defensively (+3 DRS, +3.4 UZR) and on the bases (six steals). With 1.6 fWAR in the bank, he’s on pace for a ~5 WAR campaign.
And we saved one of the best parts for last: Garcia hasn’t even turned 28 years of age. Okay, he’s just a week away from his birthday. Still, teams pondering a purchase this coming winter will get to plug a 28-year-old slugger onto their 2020 Opening Day roster.
What’s most interesting about Garcia’s free agent case is the presence of three other remarkably similar players: Marcell Ozuna of the Cardinals, Yasiel Puig of the Reds, and Nicholas Castellanos of the Tigers. Their numbers obviously vary a bit, but over the past three seasons they have landed within a fairly narrow band.
All four are right-handed hitters with roughly league-average plate discipline (Ozuna and Puig are the best of the trio in K/BB) and good but not exceptional power (Garcia sits just under .200 ISO, the other three just over). Most carry high batting averages (excepting Puig, though he has done so in the past) and well-regarded corner outfield glovework (Castellanos is the exception, though he has graded as a palatable performer this year). They’re also all rather youthful free agents; Castellanos is the youngest, having just turned 27 in March, with Ozuna and Puig already past their 28th birthdays. All have had their ups and downs.
There’s more to consider than the past three seasons — Ozuna, in particular, has a much better and more consistent overall track record — but Garcia lines up rather well on a rate basis in that span. And he has handily outperformed the other three in the present season, with only Ozuna (121 wRC+) turning in above-average offensive output to this point.
In the latest iteration of MLBTR’s 2019-20 free agent power rankings, Ozuna placed third and Puig landed the tenth spot, while Castellanos drew an honorable mention. It’s plenty understandable that my wise and able boss, Tim Dierkes, mentioned those three while excluding Garcia. At that point, Garcia carried a decent but uninspiring stat line. But as the sample has grown, so has Garcia’s case to be considered among this group. Indeed, given Puig’s struggles at the plate this seasons and a tepid early showing from Castellanos — with league-average offense and marginal defense, he’s a full win behind Garcia — it’s possible Garcia will be the top challenger to Ozuna in this market class.
We’ll see how things shake out over the coming months, but Garcia’s reemergence helps to create an interesting dynamic. The broader free agent class is rather uninspiring, owing to a round of major extensions, but it’s interesting to see this foursome of youthful, rather analogous players entering free agency at the same time. Each will drive his own earning power on the field over the final two-thirds of the season, though the markets will surely intertwine. Garcia has a long way to go to securing a quality multi-year deal — in addition to producing, he’ll need to avoid further hamstring problems — but he has already done enough to this point to make that a realistic possibility.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
delete
I get it that everybody is here for different things and that it’s not my website and they can post whatever they want And I got it some people like the features. I’ve been coming here almost since the site was started for rumors. When I click an article and read through it and don’t find any rumors I am disappointed and feel like I’ve wasted my time. There’s a reason I come here and not ESPN or something. Can you at least label the non-rumor articles as features or whatever the heck they are?
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Seems more than evident in the Titles…
delete
Thanks for the snarky comments. I can tell you guys think a lot of yourselves. At least a couple articles today where it was relatively difficult to tell whether it was going to be a rumor or a feature inside. “Theo Epstein Discusses Ben Zobrist.” “The Yankees Have Found Their First Baseman”
If you think those are obvious then all the power to you, but other than that get over yourselves.
Jeff Todd
We label analysis with the “MLBTR Originals” tag. Otherwise, I’m not sure how we’d flag such posts. I recommend you pay close attention to the titles, as we try to be precise.
If there’s a newsworthy item, that’ll be clear from the title since the key news will be conveyed there. Or, anything like “latest on” will include news updates. Notes posts are also generally news-based.
Otherwise … I am not sure what to say other than to ready exactly what we wrote in the headline. Theo on Zobrist was not a feature — it covered newsworthy quotes from an important figure on a defined topic, just as the title indicates. The Yankees post was an original; the fact that it was titled with a sort of analytical proposition gives that away.
delete
I would suggest starting the title with “FEATURE” or “ANALYSIS” like the major news organizations usually do to distinguish opinion pieces. It’s a good idea to clearly label items that are outside expected scope.
GareBear
FEATURE: Old man yells at clouds
delete
ANALYSIS: Tough keyboard warrior refers to himself as GareBear
captainsalty
You should probably just start your own site so you can “label” things properly
WalkerTexasBuehler
Hey guy, reading and comprehension don’t seem to be your forte. Maybe try checkers or ping pong.
Down with OBP
I think you spent more time commenting on this than it takes to skim the content.
dugdog83
Spot on.
Nice name too.
jorge78
Because you
have zero
comprehension
skills? That’s
your problem,
not mine…..
delete
I don’t need to start my own website. I’m a customer of this website. I get to express my opinion.
delete
As you know there are several articles per day. That time spent adds up. I don’t have the luxury of sitting here all day eating Doritos like you do. I work a demanding job and used to enjoy the fact that this was a quick streamlined stop for rumors. I’m entitled to that opinion.
delete
@jorge78 It’s only your problem because you got butthurt for no reason and decided to comment. It’s actually MLBTR’s problem if one of their customers since the beginning is dissatisfied.
captainsalty
I would almost guarantee my job is just as if not more demanding than yours, I still like the content and have no problem skipping over things that don’t interest me
delete
Great, then this comment thread is not relevant to you and you can skip right over it. Bye
partyatnapolis
i don’t mean to be “that guy” but you can kinda tell just by looking it’s a feature not a rumor lol
saintchristafa
Sometimes there’s not a rumor to report. So try to enjoy the free of charge content.
delete
I’m not asking them to stop with the features. I’m asking them to clearly label them. Read before you comment if you know how
captainsalty
I would like you to start labeling your comments… this one would’ve fallen under the “whining” label
jorge78
Again, please go away!
delete
Add yours to the useless drivel label. I’m entitled to my opinion
jorge78
Yes!
jorge78
Please go away!
snotrocket
Another buy low candidate like Dietrich that Farhan should have been all over. I thought that was supposed to be his forte…
SamWiseGanjee97
Since when does Yasiel Puig play for the Dodgers?
Jeff Todd
Old habits die hard.
DarkSide830
i mean he did it two years ago. it looked like a nice buy-low deal from the start, and the Rays have already made bank on it it seems.
brushbackmlb
As an Avi Garcia fan, I was rooting for him to join the Rockies. Considering he’s elevating the ball more, I can’t imagine how great his line would be there, plus how much improved the Rockies record may be.
Dat boi
His defense is really good too. Watching him everyday as a Rays fan,I was shocked to find out he is the fastest runner on the team, and is well above average in RF and on the bases. What is going on with the White Sox scouts?
WalkerTexasBuehler
That dude is faster than Kiermaier? Really?
Dat boi
Yes,the pre-game crew did a whole segment on how he is even faster than KK
Priggs89
They watched him play poorly and/or hurt pretty much every year except 2017, and they didn’t want to pay him ~$7M to do it again. 2018 was a gigantic disappointment. If he could’ve stayed healthy and built on his 2017 performance, he’d still be in RF for them. Obviously that didn’t happen.
I think the better question is – What’s going on with every other team’s scouts that need OF help and didn’t want to buy low on him?
dugdog83
Another Ex-tiger destroying the ball
cattrick12
Lmao he barely played with the tigers cmon now
Melchez
“Castellanos is the exception, though he has graded as a palatable performer this year” and you guys called him “unplayable” as an outfielder.
I am looking for the “MLBTR’s Melchez reports” line there….
matt4baseball
Garcia is a nightmare for opposing pictures.. He can barrel up almost everything and runs like the wind. I know the Rays are trying to sign him LT, but at what price? Anyhow, again the Rays management finds a needle in the haystack of MLB outcast of players.
ChiSox_Fan
I understand why the Sox gave up on Avi, but wish they hadn’t. He should have at least been traded for something during his career year.
Happy to see Avi is healthy and doing well.
Priggs89
I’d be willing to bet they tried after 2017, and nobody wanted to give up anything of value until he proved it wasn’t a fluke. Unfortunately, he was injured again in 2018 and didn’t perform.