Gio Gonzalez’s first trip through the free-agent process didn’t treat him well this winter, but being a free agent who’s already stretched out in mid-April — he threw 93 pitches in his last Triple-A start with the Yankees — should lead to more interest in the lefty. Clubs throughout the league might have been content to lean on internal options rather than promise a roster spot to Gonzalez over the winter, but injuries and poor performances early in the year have created an abundance of fits, and the market now has few remaining alternatives. Unlike fellow veteran lefty Dallas Keuchel, Gonzalez isn’t attached to a qualifying offer, and he’s pitched recently in a professional setting.
The asking price on Gonzalez isn’t known, but at this point, it’s difficult to imagine it’s especially exorbitant. Gonzalez settled for a minor league deal with the Yankees that came with a $3MM base rate and a hefty $300K per start in terms of incentives. At this point, a mid-range guarantee on a one-year deal that promises him a spot on a big league roster seems like it should be sufficient to sign Gonzalez, and any salary to which he agrees would be pro-rated to exclude the portion of the season that has already been played out anyhow. Put another way, signing Gonzalez to a one-year deal with a pro-rated $5MM base salary would mean adding roughly $4.3MM in spending through season’s end.
In yesterday’s MLBTR chat, it was a bit surprising to see the number of questions centering around Gonzalez. He’s a fine pitcher with an established track record, but the level of interest in him among our reader base was greater than it was at any point throughout the winter. That makes sense in mid-April, though. There are few legitimate upgrades on the free-agent market this time of year — Keuchel is a notable exception but has a much higher asking price — and teams are generally reluctant to make trades at this juncture of the season. If you’re a fan hoping to see your favorite team make even an incremental upgrade in the rotation, Gonzalez is quite possibly the best bet as far as someone who can be ready in short order. Given the general intrigue surrounding him, plus the fact that it’s April 23 and there are minimal transaction/hot stove-related storylines to monitor, the following is a way-too-in-depth look at where Gio Gonzalez could plausibly be expected to sign.
To kick things off, it seems unlikely that Gonzalez’s preference would be to sign with a non-contender. It’s true that Dan Straily recently did just that by signing with the Orioles, but he has a lesser track record and presumably faced a more limited market. Gonzalez has reportedly already drawn interest from a pair of contending clubs, and he likely wants to return to the postseason. It’d be a surprise to see him land with the Orioles, Marlins, Royals, Giants or White Sox. Clubs that entered the season unlikely to contend but have gotten off to solid starts, such as the Tigers, Blue Jays, Diamondbacks and Rangers, are all a bit likelier but still seem somewhat like long shots from here. There’s a case to be made for each of those clubs to take a look, and all have shown some willingness to spend at the levels it might take to land Gio, but a realistic assessment of their chances doesn’t really support an early-season investment.
Modest as Gonzalez’s asking price figures to be, not every team will rush to commit even a few million with the season underway. The Indians barely spent in free agency, and while they’ve lost Mike Clevinger for a couple months, they surely wouldn’t displace any of Corey Kluber, Carlos Carrasco, Trevor Bauer or Shane Bieber for Gonzalez. Pirates ownership is even more averse to spending, and Gonzalez doesn’t represent a clear upgrade over any of the current starting five (based on their early performances, anyhow).
The Cubs’ rotation is already expensive and performing well, and ownership set hard budgetary restrictions over the winter. The Red Sox are looking at 75 percent tax on any dollars spent, and they only expect Nathan Eovaldi to miss six weeks with his recent injury. They’re likely to stay in house.
Other teams are likely content with what they have in house. The Rays don’t have a set five-man rotation, but the trio of Blake Snell, Charlie Morton and Tyler Glasnow is formidable. Yonny Chirinos is something between their fourth starter and the top followup arm to an opener, and the Tampa Bay organization seems content to continue on with that opener tactic rather than adding another conventional starter. The Nationals have the game’s most expensive top four and a respectable fifth starter in Jeremy Hellickson. The Phillies are a bit of a tight fit with Jerad Eickhoff back in action and Nick Pivetta still in the picture.
The Dodgers are already teeming with rotation options and have Clayton Kershaw and Rich Hill back from injury. Out in Colorado, the Rox have finally found a homegrown slate of starters who’ve gotten the job done. Cincinnati has had success with its revamped rotation and will soon welcome Alex Wood back from the IL. The Braves have more young starting pitching options than any team in the game. Over in Houston, it’s tough to Gonzalez as a compelling upgrade, especially with some intriguing young arms stashed in the upper minors. Similarly, it seems doubtful that the Twins would pull the plug on their Martin Perez experiment after all of 12 innings.
More than half the teams in the league seem unlikely to represent a landing spot for Gonzalez, but there are plenty of viable on-paper fits in both the American League and the National League.
The Angels have again been hit hard by injuries, and Gonzalez could easily step in over Chris Stratton. Elsewhere in the division, Oakland’s injury woes date back to 2018, and offseason signee Marco Estrada has already seen his longstanding back issues flare up. De facto fifth starter Aaron Brooks has struggled, too. Perhaps the Mariners shouldn’t be taken as legitimate postseason contenders just yet, but they’re seven games over .500 with baseball’s second-bet run differential. Adding Gonzalez to deepen a rotation that currently contains rookie Erik Swanson and a perhaps fading Felix Hernandez would be a risk-free move that could help maintain their performance to date.
There are several National League contenders that arguably ought to take a hard look. The Padres’ bold plan to cycle through young starters is sure to have its ups and downs throughout a long season; plugging in a durable, well-established veteran holds obvious appeal. In the central division, the Brewers and Cardinals have both seen cracks form in their starting staffs to open the year. The Milwaukee organization, in particular, has a connection to Gonzalez and is already rumored to be in on him now. Also rumored to have interest are the Mets, who are surely thinking of replacing the struggling Jason Vargas.
It’s tough to anticipate any kind of bidding war here. But there are enough clear landing spots to think that Gonzalez may be able to push the price up a bit and command a MLB rotation gig right out of the gates.
chicagofan1978
Brewers are going to sign him. The fans are growing restless with the rotation and they can’t afford to lose any revenue in that ballpark.
Mickey Morandini
I have to agree. I’ve always liked Gio and while I don’t like the idea of the Brewers signing him (because I’m a Cubs fan), he’d be affordable, he has a solid track record, and he’d be an immediate upgrade to their rotation. The NL Central is a crazy competitive division and will be even more so when some of the struggling or injured Reds start playing like they should.
chicagofan1978
They can definitely afford him over Keuchel. If they don’t get him they better do something quick
thecoffinnail
Hey Mickey, I never could figure out how you kept Riggleman from replacing you at 2nd with Blauser in 1999. You stunk it up with the bat big time. Blauser managed to stay healthy all year and was decent with the bat. Yet, it seemed like everytime you got a day off he replaced you with that kid Myers (I think that was his name. It was Chad something). Seemed like the Cubs got smart and spent what they were paying you and Blauser on Eric Young in 2000. I know it had to be tough replacing Sandberg (Cubs replaced one Ex-Phillie 2nd baseman with another) but you had a decent year in 98. Seemed like you always got a hit or a walk (never could hit for power though). Then 99 came around and you decided to save your energy for the millennial party or something. Because you really sucked in 99. Downright awful!!
afsooner02
Lol….”can’t afford to lose any revenue in that ballpark”
Miller Park opened 2001….the brewers have been to playoffs 3 times in that span and had 12 losing seasons in that time…..
Can’t afford to lose any revenue…..one of the dumbest things I’ve read on here
chicagofan1978
Meaning they don’t want to have fans not come and spend money because they aren’t trying to better the team. Why does everyone feel the need to spew insults? Seriously it gets old
afsooner02
Why do you feel the need to make up lies? I called you on it and now you can’t deal with the fact you’re just wrong with what you wrote.
drewm
It really is a terrible comment. The Brewers draw exceptionally well, have a lot of exciting players, advanced to the playoffs last season unlike your Cubs, have a very reasonable payroll, and don’t have any games cancelled due to weather. It’s an exceptional fan environment… aside from the Chicago fans who drive north to watch Cubs away games and throw up in the parking lot
chicagofan1978
I’m a Sox fan, my team draws nothing
stan lee the manly
Miller Park is awesome, I love it, but the Brewers absolutely DO NOT draw exceptionally well. Twice I have been to the Brewers/Cards games this year and twice the stadium was less than half full. These are the most meaningful and high octane series the Brewers will see all year along with the Cubs series and they can’t even hit three quarters attendance with that exciting of an offense?
The only series they sell out for is against the Cubs, and that’s because there’s more Cubs fans than Brewers fans at those games.
chicagofan1978
Who made up lies?
jbigz12
Well Baseball is a tough sell in 50 degree weather. The crew were 10th in attendance last year. Averaged 35K a game. Or an 84% ticket sold rate. That’s very good. If you’re a cubs or cardinals fan that’s not really a good barometer to judge the rest of the league by. Most teams don’t sell tickets like that.
Ry.the.Stunner
@Drew – pretty sure the Cubs were in the playoffs last year too.
Mikegna
espn.com/mlb/attendance
Seems to me like through the first month of the season they are in the upper 1/3 in attendance average across the league and over past 2 seasons in top 10. If you go further back, upper half of the league always
bucketbrew35
@Ry.the.Stunner not for very long though.
brockswipessecond
I agree, I really like Miller Park, but I have never had any problem getting tickets to see the Cardinals up there. The attendance has been better the past few years, but when they were losing consistently we could sit just about anywhere we wanted. It was harder to get seats in County Stadium.
twentyforty
Weather? Milwaukee has a roof. WTF?
jorge78
But not over
the whole
city…..
stymeedone
he may have blinked and missed it.
jorge78
Why doesn’t someone look up the Brewers average attendance for the last few years and post that? I can’t, I’m doing laundry…..
phenomenalajs
I think the Mets could grab him. I have tickets for tonight’s game (if I’m feeling well enough to go) and would much rather see Gio start over Vargas.
VonPurpleHayes
I honestly don’t see Gio as much of an upgrade over Vargas
brewfan27
brewers better not sign him
chicagofan1978
Why?
YakAttack
He may die.
chicagofan1978
You mad?
zpgreen
Brew crew is going nowhere fast. As a cardinals fan I’m not excited about the Brewers signing Gio and getting better, but they have to get that rotation going if they want to continue to stay with the top of the division.
Pirates look at least somewhat legit and they haven’t even had Polanco. The Cardinals finally have the offense they have been seeking for the past few years. Cubs will be there at the end as long as the health holds up.
drewm
As a cards fan you’re not at all objective about anything
TreyMancini
Ehhhh, the brewers are a little overated. Cards should top them, maybe even cubs or pirates as well.
twentyforty
Every team will be there if health holds up. And Gio makes nobody better. Everyone realizes who he is, right?
YakAttack
Replace Matt Moore? Guaranteed spot in the rotation to show he has a lil aomethin left.
bradthebluefish
Not a bad idea. Then have Detroit trade Gio mid season.
YakAttack
Exactly. That was the thinking with Moore and Ross. Gio should/would get more back if he meets his averages or better.
jbigz12
Why would Gio sign in a place where he knows he’ll get traded? Unless they overpay it makes no sense. He has his pick of the league right now. No matter where he signs he obviously could get traded but there’s no reason for him to go somewhere where he is 99% likely to get dealt. Unless the tigers give him 10 million bucks or something but that defeats the whole purpose.
YakAttack
What contenders are clamoring for his services? He cleared waivers. Pitchimg every 5 days is a good auditom.
mlb1225
Why would Gio sign with a non-contender? Like you said, he pretty much knows he’ll get traded again mid-season to a contender. To be honest, if my market was pretty bare, I would sign a small 1 year deal with a rebuilding team since I’m almost guaranteed to be moved at the deadline to a winning team. Gio is basically in a win-win situation if he wants to be on a contender.
BV
there was no waiver process. there are many contenders pursuing him. personally, I think he ends up on the Mets or Brewers.
jbigz12
He was never exposed to waivers he was released from a minor league deal. He has at least 3-4 playoff contending teams interested. Gio won’t be a tiger.
stymeedone
Tigers are only 2-3 games out. In the Central, they are a contender. .500 could take it.
DarkSide830
everyone’s so sure he is going to a contender, when he could almost guarantee a trip to a contender by going to a team that will flip him at the deadline.
jbigz12
How does that logic work? You mean to tell me Gio who has interest from playoff contenders now, wants to sign with a non contender who can trade him anywhere in a couple of months. If you could pick where you could work for the rest of the year for the same salary why would you let someone else decide? I certainly would not.
Karlander
Whether it’s Gio or Kuechel the Brewers need some additional pitching talent. They badly over estimated their starting and bullpen talent. It’s a very mediocre staff apart from Hader. Brewers won’t be able to compete with the best staffs of the NL. Their pitching quality has already been exposed. Bad idea to go with mostly young starters. They already had to back track on that. If the team doesn’t have a big offensive night, they lose.
bravesfan
Mets need this more than anyone, it locks down a pretty legit rotation. I still think Dallas is a better fit and would make their rotation insane and one of the best top to bottom ever. But Gio make that 5th spots light years better than it’s been so far
BV
I think the Brewers need it as much as the Mets, but I am hoping he signs with the Mets. He has great numbers at Citi Field (although it was against some bad Mets offenses). He knows the hitters in the division. He was willing to play in NY if the Yankees gave him a shot. He obviously needs to weigh offers, but I hope he doesn’t drag it along for much longer.
pinkerton
those pesky Skeeters will nab him