As we approach the one-month mark of the young 2019 season, the MLB standings are starting to take shape, with fast starters trying to separate from the pack and rebuilding teams falling behind. With that said, the current slate of division leaders features some surprises. Notably, preseason favorites like the Yankees and Red Sox have encountered considerable adversity, while juggernauts like the Dodgers and Astros have thus far met expectations. Meanwhile, a number of teams that received less attention as potential contenders have found themselves climbing MLB’s rankings. Power surges in Seattle and Minnesota have carried the Mariners and Twins to the top of AL’s West and Central divisions, respectively. Elite run prevention in Pittsburgh has allowed the Pirates to flourish in the hyper-competitive NL Central. An injection of youthful energy has driven the Padres to within striking distance of the powerhouse Dodgers. Let’s examine these upstart clubs and look ahead to their outlook for the rest of the season.
The Mariners made headlines throughout the offseason, but often for the wrong reasons. General manager Jerry Dipoto spent the winter shipping off nearly every Major Leaguer with value, and now fields a team that only vaguely resembles the one that won 89 games in 2018. Edwin Diaz, Robinson Cano, Jean Segura, and James Paxton were all dealt to the East Coast. Last season’s iteration of the Mariners was notorious for its unsustainable first-half performance, repeatedly winning one-run games, often thanks to the heroics of Edwin Diaz. In 2019, the story is of a different flavor, though skeptics may once again challenge the sustainability of April’s returns. This year’s team is slugging home runs at a historic rate, including a streak of 20 games in which the team hit at least one round-tripper. The 2019 Mariners have belted 56 home runs, 12 more than the next closest team, the Dodgers. Tim Beckham and Domingo Santana are churning out extra-base hits, and Mitch Haniger is rising to stardom. Still, the Astros are looming, and a spot in the AL Wild Card will not come easy, with sleeping giants in the AL East working through early adversity–to say nothing of the undeniable Rays.
In a division that has all the makings of a bloodbath, many might have counted out the Pirates after an uninspired offseason: whereas rivals’ offseasons were highlighted by flashy additions like Paul Goldschmidt, Yasiel Puig, and Yasmani Grandal, the Pirates were quiet in the winter, with names like Lonnie Chisenhall and Erik Gonzalez headlining the team’s moves. However, it has quickly become clear that the 12-7 Pirates boast one of the Majors’ best pitching staffs. Behind Jameson Taillon, Trevor Williams has emerged as an automatic quality start every outing. Meanwhile, Joe Musgrove is showing off the dynamic stuff that made him the centerpiece in the Gerrit Cole trade, and Jordan Lyles has been a pleasant surprise to round out the rotation. Felipe Vazquez is dynamite in the late innings, and Richard Rodriguez showed promise last season as a high-leverage option, though the bullpen is somewhat shaky beyond that combination. On offense, things are less peachy, but Josh Bell is turning heads by coupling prodigious power with a keen batting eye. Again, the NL Central will provide no shortage of resistance, but a starting rotation of this caliber should keep the Pirates in more than their fair share of games.
With the last three seasons resembling a roller coaster ride, the Twins entered the offseason hoping to turn a corner. Derek Falvey and Thad Levine set out with essentially blank future payroll, capitalizing on that flexibility by bringing aboard veterans like Nelson Cruz, Marwin Gonzalez, and Jonathan Schoop to bolster a group of young position players that the Twins hope will be galvanized by rookie manager Rocco Baldelli. Jorge Polanco, fresh off a spring contract extension, has provided encouraging production from the shortstop position, and Eddie Rosario is blasting home runs at an impressive rate. Byron Buxton appears to have unlocked the potential that made him a top prospect, and Jose Berrios is entering bona fide ace territory. The pitching appears much improved from years’ past, with a bullpen headed by Taylor Rogers, who belongs in conversations with the league’s elite relief arms. This team may have the most attainable path to October baseball, playing in a weak division where their primary competition is the Indians, a team that has at times appeared vulnerable in 2019.
The Padres thrust themselves into the conversation for the postseason when general manager A.J. Preller and company added Manny Machado to the mix in a franchise-altering move. The team doubled down when the front office broke the mold by breaking camp with top prospects Fernando Tatis Jr. and Chris Paddack on the Opening Day roster. Those moves have paid massive dividends thus far, with Tatis forcing his way into the national spotlight, displaying a five-tool skillset. The club’s rotation of young outfielders is launching homers, and the anonymous bullpen has quietly been one of the best in baseball dating back to last season. Meanwhile, with a host of young starters comprising the rotation, the possibility of a Dallas Keuchel addition remains on the table–a move that would emphatically declare the Friars’ intention to make a postseason push. At the top of the NL West, the Dodgers represent a daunting giant to topple, and the rest of the National League features no shortage of contending teams, but the Padres’ spunk might lead to meaningful autumn baseball for the first time in nearly a decade.
While there are months of baseball left to play, trades to be made, injuries to work around, and breakouts to emerge, the games played in March and April are no less important than those in September. Early-season results can lay the groundwork for what’s to come. Which of the aforementioned blossoming clubs are best positioned to sustain their success and exceed expectations?
(Poll link for app users)
kylegocougs
I voted for the M’s… not because I believe it but because I need it.
mgrap84
I voted for them too. Not a fan of any of the teams on the list but they have a great rotation going and a hell of a lineup. I mean its close between them and the Padres
Stevil
That’s funny–and understandable. But if it helps, the defense should get a boost with Seager and Crawford in early June. Bishop should be right behind them. The bullpen is obviously the biggest concern, but they might get some help from an unknown Parker Markel who is missing bats every time he hits the mound. Look for him to replace Alaniz relatively soon. With a little luck, Tui and Strickland will return in early June as well.
They lack pitching depth, but it may not take much to tighten up.
ayrbhoy
I picked the M’s because the lineup has added guys (like EE, Vogey, and Narvaez) who don’t swing at bad pitches. They work the count put up great AB’s and force SP’s out before the 6th inn. Healy and Dee will still chase pitches out of the zone but there’s hope for Healy- he has improved already.
As you say Stevil their pen is a big concern- Gearrin and Rosscup are inconsistent, Alaniz has been rocked and Shawn Armstrong is not the RP we saw in Sept of 2018. In addition to Tui and Strickland there’s also an option of bringing up 1 or 2 of Sheffield, Swanson (after he replaces LeBlanc) and possibly Justin Dunn. If they’re careful w his inning count Joey Gerber might be ready in Sept also. It will be interesting to see how Dipoto handles this surprise- will he break up the band or add BP pieces? Nice problem to have.
Stevil
There were questions about both Swanson and Dunn being able to stick in the rotation. I would guess that Swanson is more likely to be used out of the ‘pen of the two. There was hope that Mills would be able to debut at some point, but he’s having trouble adjusting to AA hitters.
I think there’s been a general belief that they could swap players like EE, Bruce, or Gordon for relief help. But I think they’re more likely to get relievers that aren’t quite ready. They might be able to get creative and move some of the non-essential outfielders, such as Ian Miller and (eventually) Eric Filia, for a little help, but I’m not anticipating any major moves for relievers.
Metman34
The M’s have a better shot at making the playoffs now than ever… Even though they lost Diaz, Cano, Segura, and Paxton
ColossusOfClout
“None of the above” should have been an option.
todd76
The Yankees are for real at .500
RiseAgainst3598
I was literally going to ask about this in the chat but missed it! Thank you MLBTR, great work!
HarveyD82
bucco schedule favors them in April. then they face the dodgers. may is where we shall see how good they are.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
Don’t lose hope, Harvey. If they go 40-133 the rest of the way, your “52 wins” prediction can still come true.
Fingers crossed, right?
leefieux
The Bucs are a .500 ball club at best. Their SPs aren’t this good and their offense really isn’t much better than they’ve shown so far. Didn’t last year’s 26-17 start teach you anything, forwhom?
66TheNumberOfTheBest
I address their outlook for this season below.
81 wins are a far cry from 52 wins, yes?
What the Pirates record last year (and so far this year) has taught me is that the “fans” believe that their (mostly uninformed) opinions to be concrete reality while the actual record is ignored as irrelevant.
Example, the trading of Ivan Nova was held up as proof that they don’t care about winning and the signing of Jordan Lyles as proof that they are cheap and don’t care.
The Melancon trade was greeted with the same spiel, “they are cheap and don’t want to win” and even years later, this was still parroted by the “fans” and media.
I never hear any of them go back and say “hey, maybe Lyles is better than Nova” or “in hindsight, the Melancon trade was one of the best in recent MLB history.”
It’s fascinating.
Black_Pearl
leefieux What makes this team different from last years that they can can’t grab a few more wins and get to 88-90? The pitching will only be better with more growth and the offense can only get better when their best two players, Polonco and Dickerson, get healthy. Even if SS stays a problem it’s not enough of a drop-off to be worse than last year. IMO Tucker will be the best Pirates SS in a long time.
jbigz12
The nova for lyles swap looks good. They could’ve maybe reinvested those saved funds on another upgrade though don’t you think? Considering this team was trying to “compete” and made an all in move like getting archer. You don’t think you’re going to get criticism when you slash your already comically low 91MM payroll to 77?
Goku the Knowledgable One
They have a top 5 rotation in baseball.
Polanco will be a nice boost to the lineup.
Other than Killwaukee, division is terrible, so buccos have a good shot
Goku the Knowledgable One
Not even asking for a huge upgrade, but an extra 5mil to land Beckham instead of Erik would’ve been nice
jbigz12
That division is easily in the top 3 most competitive divisions in baseball. That couldn’t be a more wrong thing to say. That division is far from terrible. Teams are all flawed in someway but these figures to be the one of the most interesting divisional races this year. Right up there with the ALE and NLE.
mlb1225
You know, I was pretty wrong about Lyles. Originally, I thought that the 5th spot was going to be a carousel of pitchers swapping in and out until somebody proved they could put up decent innings. I hope that comebacker that hit his hand isn’t going to hurt his performance. But anybody that thinks this is going to be a 60 win or less team is insane. I’m not saying that they’re going to win 100 games and make a run like the Brewers did last year, but I don’t think the realm of about 85 wins is impossible.
Grizalt
Mark Melancon was one of the best (if not the best) closers in the National League in 2016. The Pirates certainly weren’t trying to win that year. It probably wasn’t going to happen anyway because of what the Cubs were doing and the trade obviously worked out well long-term considering Mark went chasing the money to SF after the season and Vazquez has been good for the Pirates but a team that was serious about making the playoffs that year wouldn’t have traded Mark for anything.
spudchukar
The division is terrible? Most would disagree. The Pirate schedule has been an advantage, more road games granted, but still hardly top-notch competition. And the extra days off aids the bull pen. I believe the Pirates can be a .500 team if things break well, but still see them as a 4th place finish in the tough NL Central.
panj341
Agree, if you are in contention and really trying to win you don’t move veteran players.. The time to rebuild is when you are out of contention or during the off season.
JoeBrady
That’s about a 99% certainty with the press. They are generally LW and will side with the unions, any unions. And, in this case, they cannot be considered unbiased, as their livelihood depends on access to players that are in that union.
What you said about PT is true with most small market teams. TB regularly gets hammered for trading their big names, but they are regularly correct.
Teams like TO & BA get applauded for holding onto Donaldson & Machado. Teams like Miami and Seattle get hammered for building for the future. But Seattle & Miami will have better records than TO and BA.
It’s a business requiring tough decisions. Even when they made the Melancon trade, one could easily have argued that PT was getting the better player, regardless of service time & salary.
Grizalt
Melancon was the better reliever at the time. He was the best closer in the NL that year. If Vazquez were indeed better than Melancon back then, the Nats wouldn’t have dared trade 4+ years of Vazquez for 2 months of Melancon. It’s hindsight to say that Vazquez is better based on what they have done the last 2 years.
Mark Abraham
Trading Melancon wasnt the real issue. Yeah, he was good but Watson was an all star level reliever ready to step in. Vazquez takes over the 8th and no harm no foul. Except Watson folded. His first 20 games as closer he had a 4.58 era.It was just bad luck.
August 29th we were .5 games back of the wild card. Watson blew a save that day and 2 more in a stretch that seen the team go 2-12. Cutch hit .192 in that span.
Coles last 12 games that year the team went 2-10 and he had a 5.03 era. When your closer,your mvp and your ace melt in the spotlight, your doomed.
It’s amazing they hung in at all that season. Liriano had a 3.26 era from 2013-15 then blew up with a 5.46.
Cutch, Pedro, Kang were 1-3 in slugging in 15. Pedro lost his mind and we dropped him. Kang only started 82 games and Cutchs slugging dropped 58points and his ops 123pts.
Fans blame the payroll all the time, but 2016 was the players fault.
Again just look at what happened. We lost Pedro, half a season from Kang, Cutch lost his mvp shine. Our 2 aces fell apart and our all star reliever couldnt handle the 9th inning.
Then things got crazier in 17 when we found out Kang couldnt play and we lost Marte to peds, and Polanco lost 50 games and Cervelli 80 to injury. Taillon even got cancer.
Cutch was hitting 200 after the first 45 games.
Despite all that we were only 3 games back of the division after 116 games. And again over the next 34 games, Cutch hit .233 and Cile had a 4.80era in his last 11 starts with the team losing all but 3 of those games.
All these circumstances make me appreciate the team even more. Yeah the havent been to the playoffs in 3yrs but they really fight and make it interesting against all the odds.
Even the wildcard has just been terrible luck for us. I mean how insane is it to draw the short straw and face Arrieta in the middle of his historic run and Bumgarner in what turned out to be one of the most historic postseason for any single player.
This team is snakebit.
Grizalt
You don’t weaken the team at the deadline if you have any intention of making the playoffs and going far in the playoffs. Trading Melancon in the middle of the season he was having does constitute “weakening the team.”
Mark Abraham
These fans seem similar to the ones I’ve encountered. The type of person to say things like “I cant believe we didnt give Russell Martin 80million dollars, I’m sick of funding 7 springs, I hope it burns!”
I wonder how many of the fans that uttered absurd phrases like, ” this team will never win after letting Neil Walker go” even know hes a Marlin. I also like to think of what catchy phrases theyd bless the fandom with if we had two 15mill players hitting under .200 on the team.
I encountered a rare breed last year. True diehard fans that applauded Josh Harrison for bashing the team when he said he didn’t want to be here if we were rebuilding. I guess if I had a catchy 80ops+, I’d make outlandish demands too. I guess Harrison got the last laugh, joining the perennial contender, the almighty Tigers of Detroit.
Alas now we have a new breed to remind us how bad the front office is. The Cult of Glasnow. Esteemed scouts that knew this kid would be a star, but fooled everyone last yr by playing the opposite game and declaring him a bust before the trade.
I have to admit,these followers of Glasnow have opened my eyes to terrible truths I was too weak to see for myself. For years I was fooled by a coach named Searage, praying on my child like optimism. I’ve come to learn this man is a terrible coach. I should have realized this when Cole was traded and had agreat season but I could be blinded no more when Glasnow began pitching good. These pitchers were held back by Searage. Their success is proof of Ray’s ineptitude.
I was crushed and tried to rationalize the situation. The Pirates have the best staff era in all of baseball despite the fact we traded Cole and Glasnow. Doesn’t that actually show how good Searage is, I wondered aloud. I was quickly reminded that this was black magic and it wouldn’t last. And when the spell is lifted and the rotation fails, these great fanatics will be there to say I TOLD YOU SOOOOO, ITS CUZ THEIR CHEAP!
Mark Abraham
Nomar Garciaparra would disagree
Mark Abraham
I know that’s only 1 example
And more serious, the wild card is why it’s hard for a small market team to go all in.
If we keep him theres still no guarantee we were going to make the playoffs and if we didnt make that trade wed be worse off now for it.
We couldn’t take the division that year, and would of likely been facing Bumgarner again if we made the wild card. Theres a chance wed be 1 and done with nothing to show. And again we had an all star reliever with a sub 2 era the prior 2 years. Theres no reason to think he couldnt handle it.
Look at the Nationals, they are prob kicking themselves for not trading Harper.
Grizalt
Having a reliever like Vazquez is nice, but the Pirates would trade him for a championship every time.
Now sure, they probably wouldn’t have won a championship that year even with Melancon. But make no mistake. Trading him was pulling the plug on the season.
Xavier Blaine
Twins. Every other team on here will finish at or below .500
coldbeer
They need at least 1 more starter…maybe Keuchel? And, at some point Cron and Gonzalez are going to have to start hitting or 1st and 3rd needs to be upgraded.
jbigz12
They have Miguel Sano coming back ready to fill that role. They’re a solid team with a lot of pop. Particularly when Sano returns. Cruz has a lot more power than he’s shown and adding Sano will boost that. It should be the best lineup in the AL central. I think they’ve got a good shot at taking the crown in that division. The pen will have to lock games down if they’re to do it though.
Thanks
M’s legit. They are MLB’s version of the Boston Celtics.
You can rebuild, and make playoffs, at the same time.
It would be something if they did. Not a Mariners’ fan, but I hope their fans get some closure when playoff drought ends.
Xavier Blaine
Except the Celtics have actually made the playoffs sometime in the past 18 years.
Vizionaire
they beat the angels when there are more in ir than 25.
jbigz12
Idc who is on the IL the mariners are significantly better than the angels who without mike trout would be no better than teams like the White Sox or tigers. That team sucks. They’ve literally pissed away every dollar they’ve spent in FA. And somehow have overspent on guys in a depressed FA market. How they ever came to the conclusion Matt Harvey was worth 11-14 million dollars I will never know. Or that playing Zack Cozart at 3B was ever going to be a success.
The M’s need a completely new bullpen but they’ve got some pieces in place now for an interesting team moving forward if Dipoto can make a couple additions in the next couple seasons. They should fade at some point this year. Hopefully before the deadline so they can sell off some ST assets and keep adding.
davidcoonce74
The Padres were predicted to win around 75 games this season; I think that’s probably still the total. But kudos to them for not manipulating service time and actually trying to win.
Grizalt
Not sure how dumping an All Star’s age 26 season down the drain is “trying to win.” But to each his or her own I guess.
hiflew
Did I miss Tatis making the All Star Game at some point?
jleve618
I think Machado is 26.
jbigz12
A very real chance he makes one this year. Not hard to see many all star games in his future.
davidcoonce74
I can’t figure this comment out. Machado? He was only going to be a free agent once. Even if the Padres weren’t projected to win this year they had to jump on a transformational player when they could. He’ll be with them for ten years, and I would guess that a fair amount of those ten years the Padres will be good. As for Tatis, there’s no reason to leave him in the minors except the service-time stuff. See how that’s working out for Kris Bryant and the Cubs; there’s no way in hell he’s re-signing with them because of what they did to him his rookie year. At least Tatis knows the organization values him and, more importantly, wants to put its best players on the field.
Grizalt
“As for Tatis, there’s no reason to leave him in the minors except the service-time stuff.”
That’s the only reason they need.
“See how that’s working out for Kris Bryant and the Cubs; there’s no way in hell he’s re-signing with them because of what they did to him his rookie year.”
I don’t believe that that’s true. He’ll stay if they pay him. And I’m not convinced he would have given them any kind of discount even if they had called him up to start 2015.
davidcoonce74
It’s a terrible system and I’m glad the Padres aren’t engaging in it.
Grizalt
You won’t be so glad in 6 years when Tatis is playing in Chicago.
Grizalt
By the way how is the service time manipulation thing working out for Ronald Acuña and the Braves?
davidcoonce74
Working out great for the Braves! I mean, they get a once-in-a-lifetime talent and get to underpay him. Not a good deal for Acuna but who knows where his head was at when he signed that deal. Maybe the Padres get lucky and get to do the same with Tatis, Jr.
But I like the idea of a team playing its best players. That seems like it should be the focus of a competitive sportsball team.
Grizalt
Padres would be playing him. He would be up by now. He only had to spend 15 days in the minors. Not half the season.
Anyway, were I Preller, I would have done what CWS did with Jimenez.
JoeBrady
1-They will win less games over the next 7 seasons because of that move.
2-And still won’t make the playoffs this year.
At the end of the journey, in 6 years, no one will remember whether they won 77 or 82 this year. Same with teams holding onto their stars when they cannot compete. Most TO & BA fans can’t remember their win total last year. But they would remember if either/both got a couple of top-50 prospects when they had their top value & leverage.
As a RS, I’m glad we traded Miller for ERod, and disappointed that we didn’t trade Koji during the purge.
zachgwest
Even if Mariners start losing they will still be wining bc all they really want to do is move pieces at the deadline. To be honest it might be like Major League hoping they lose so they can tear down haha Ps we need a new baseball movie
Ninth 3 Year Plan
I definitely believe the 6 game losing streak the pads just endured is for real
#maybenextyear
Goku the Knowledgable One
Don’t think they have the pitching to endure
BlueSkyLA
If any of these teams can sustain (doubtful) then the Mariners probably have to be handicapped as having the best chance. They are not outplaying their ability to score and prevent runs (unlike the Padres, who should be expected to have a solidly losing record based on run differential).
davidcoonce74
Yeah, I don’t think Pythag records mean anything this early, because one or two blowouts really warp the run differentials. That stuff doesn’t really start normalizing until around 40 games into the season. I think the Padres are a 75-win team, as predicted, but they’ve already banked 11 of those wins, and Fernando Tatis has put up 1.5 WAR in 22 games. That’s exceptional, and Machado is right up there with him. The pitching has been so-so, besides Margevicious, Paddack and Yates, but I do think Lucchesi and Lauer are better than they’ve shown. I don’t think Strahm is a starter, but could be a Hader-like bullpen piece. It’s an exciting team to watch for the first time in a long time. The last time I saw the Padres play in person they were running guys like James Shields and Matt Kemp out there. This team is so much more fun to watch.
BlueSkyLA
Right, but then the question is being asked in the third week of the season, so we have to go with the limited information we’ve got to answer it. No doubt the Padres are a team on the way up but they are still allowing quite a few more runs than they are scoring so far this year. Even without going to Pythagorean projections, we have to know that is usually going to produce a losing record, especially if it keeps up over time. I don’t see any of these teams as likely posting better than .500 records when all is said and done, but it’s difficult to ignore what Seattle is doing right now. They’ve outscored all of baseball, and not by just a little.
I wonder why the Rays weren’t on this poll. They are way better so far than they were projected to be.
davidcoonce74
Like I wrote, pythag projections normalize at around 40 games played.
BlueSkyLA
Okay but I thought it was clear that I am not relying on Pythagorean projections, which are more than just run differential calculations.
davidcoonce74
Pythag projections are exactly run differential calculations.
BlueSkyLA
No, not really, since it is a non-linear calculation and subtraction doesn’t come into the formula at all. I don’t know what exponent MLB uses for their pythagorean calculations, but baseball-reference describes their formula as using an exponent of 1.83, which they say is more accurate. Either way the basic formula is:
win ratio = (runs scored)^e / (runs scored)^e + (runs allowed)^e
fred-3
Other than Tatis and Paddack, I don’t get the hype for some of the Padres young players.
davidcoonce74
You should watch Margevicius sometime. A 23-year old who jumped directly from A-ball to the majors, and has a 19/2 K/BB rate in 20 innings. He’s really good. And Urias hasn’t gotten to play much, because the Padres seem to love running what’s left of Ian Kinsler out there, but Urias is going to be a really good second baseman I think; he’s been an on-base machine in the minors.
I also wouldn’t give up yet on Mejia; catching prospects take forever to develop, and a guy who was a top-10 prospect in baseball twice and is still only 23 is still a prospect. Most catching prospects aren’t even in the majors at 23; Yadier Molina, for example, posted this line in his age-23 season: 216/274/321. And although he’s a glove-first catcher who is going to the Hall of Fame, it took him several years until his bat finally played in the majors. Catching is hard. The learning curve is steep, and there’s a reason why catchers stick around forever.
fred-3
I can’t think of the last time a hit first catching prospects has succeeded in the majors. It seems like the ones who grade above average defensively work out the best.
rizdakc99
Mike Piazza
davidcoonce74
Someone beat me to this, but Mike Piazza says hello.
mlbh
Honestly, he’s fine defensively. A tic below average in terms of blocking, framing and receiving, but he has a cannon for an arm, (MLB Pipeline threw a 70 on it) so he’s able to limit the running game.
We’ve already seen him blast some lasers to 2B from his knees.
It’s his bat I actually worry about. He swings at EVERYTHING. He has zero approach. He’s not trying to get “that” pitch. He’s a disaster up there.
Grizalt
Problem is Mejia needs everyday PA’s to get into a groove and he’s not getting them and he only has one option year left. I see one of him or Hedges getting traded at some point.
Disco Dave
you forgot the tigers and red sox as surprises…
stansfield123
You forgot to include the Scranton Railriders. They’re second in the AL East, and on a three game winning streak.
sidewinder11
Underrated comment
Melchez
I think the Twins for a couple reasons. We knew they were a potential challenger to the Indians before the season. The Indians are vulnerable and have shown they have flaws. The Twins are in a division with three very bad teams. Nothing breaks a slump faster than playing teams that are “taking”.
joew
pirates are not really a surprise.
kc38
Cool, the Rays aren’t on the list lol….. okayyyy?
diller1340
They were a surprise last year this year they were expected to be good just over shadowed by the Yankees and Red Sox even though they are off to rough starts
66TheNumberOfTheBest
If by “for real” you mean most likely to make the playoffs, it’s the Twins or Pirates.
The Twins have only one challenger in front of them. If the Indians stumble, the Twins have a clear path.
The Pirates play in a division where all 5 teams have flaws and 4 of them still have a chance to win it.
The starters have been amazing. Unsustainably amazing. If they are just good, can this team still win? The answer is maybe. Because so far, the bullpen (which in theory is excellent) has been mediocre and should get better. The offense has been without 2 of their top 3 OF’ers all season and is now playing with their #5, 6 and 7 OF’ers starting. The starting 3B missed two years of MLB and is only now getting going. Injuries to their backup C have forced Cervelli to play too much, hurting his production. So, the bullpen and offense can theoretically help balance any regression to the starting staff.
FTR, I would like to see the M’s accidentally end their playoff drought during an intended rebuild, though.
geejohnny
Cervelli rarely has been this bad offensively. Can’t wait for Diaz to hit his stride.
DarkSide830
Twins are the only team likely to continue their current level of success, but i see the Mariners continuing to contend as well, maybe the Padres to some extent as well.
geejohnny
Don’t quite understand the lack of love for the Pirates. The Twins have a very thin staff and their best chance lies in the fact that they play in a poor division. The Indians are better..period. The Pirates play in a much better division and are playing with a AAA squad right now. The pitching is overall better than all the competitors.
mikeyst13
The lack of love for the Pirates is because of that division they play in. They are off to a great start, but eventually they have to start playing games within the division against Chicago, Milwaukee, and St Louis. Cubs are scuffling a bit but most believe they will turn it around, Milwaukee and StL are both playing well while having 2 head to head series, a Cubs series down, and dealing with the Dodgers (4 games for Stl and 6 for Milwaukee) While Pit has had Detriot, SF, a scuffilng Wash squad, and 2 series against the Reds. The best 2 teams Pit has played has been Chicago and StL and they lost both those series.
spudchukar
This. It is always great psychologically to get off to a good start, but honest Pirate fans must know that part of their early success has to be due to the competition. The Cards and Brewers have both had rough opening schedules, as noted. And it isn’t going to get much easier soon with the Brewers coming to St. Louis starting today. Then they don’t see each other again until August. Scheduling is an algorithmic nightmare, but still it has room for improvement. The Buccos still have much to prove.
RichReese
Thin staff? Pineda thanks you.
The Ranger Fan
The Rangers starters are gonna get better and better this year, They are building arm strength after being off for One and two years ,we have the offense, Texas always will have the mashers and bombers, but our pitching has surprisingly been decent so far, yes we could use a couple more bullpen quality relievers along the way, I think we’re gonna surprise a few that picked us dead last. Let’s see it play out.
Mendoza Line 215
The Pirates have to show that they have improved significantly over a longer period.They are 1 and 4 against the Cubs and Cardinals.
I do not understand why Stallings has not played more if overwork is the cause of Cervelli’s poor showing.Why keep him on the roster then?
The bullpen has underperformed but it should be one of the best in baseball.Crick was not mentioned but he would have helped in a couple of games that they lost.
The starting pitching had been underrated but they have shown how very fine they very well may be.
They are banking on improved hitting from some veterans and the return of their two best hitters.
The replacements in the outfield have actually been some of their best hitters.
Hopefully Tucker is the real deal because they had a weakness at shortstop which was not improved over the winter.
I am sticking to my prediction of 84 wins and possible contention for the division championship.
greg1
Twins, if for no other reason than they can win 83-85 games and win their division.
GarryHarris
For me, none of these teams are surprise teams However, sustaining their momentum is the real question. The Twins have the easiest schedule and in truth, their pitching is much better than I thought it would be preseason. Seattle’s GM will be changing the team around mid season.
The Ranger Fan
So I’m watching MLB central just now,The highlights of the Rangers and Astros are playing, so we score 22 runs off this great Astro pitching and win 2 of 3 and all the while the MLB announcer is giving cudos and praise to the Astros,even up to the last out of Chirinos striking out to end the game, gimme a break, no better yet give the Rangers a break,we’re talking bout a Tommy John rotation this year that is getting better by the game.
madmanTX
Yep. When the Rangers are hoisting the Silver Boot, MLB will still be crowing about the pretty vulnerable Astros this season still. I mean they have to be vulnerable losing to a patchwork club…if the Rangers are no good, I mean.
The Ranger Fan
Personally I’m jealous of Houston for being so good, but I’m gonna root against them all year anyway,and hope that my Rangers ruin it for them, Even when we went to the show in 2010 and 2011 we got no respect, The radio show 105.3 brought up a good point today,Why are we not ranked, not by the 3 groups that do the rankings, according to our record we should be 11 or 12 can somebody please give me a tissue and some cheese for all this whine.
ayrbhoy
Ranger Fan- I know exactly what you mean, that type of thing happens after the Mariners games. Yesterday the M’s had the best win pct. in MLB and the 2nd best run differential and what was our spot in the MLB power rankings? Number 12!
bbatardo
I am a little biased, but I do think the Padres will compete this year. 12-11 and their offense hasn’t quite clicked yet. They won’t overtake the Dodgers or anything, but a winning record and chance at wild card I can see.
raz427
I had Twins winning division before the season started. Lineup is really good and deep when it performs. They really did their homework on value with guys like Nelly, and Marwin. Bullpen needs to be addressed but the makings of a sleeper division winner is there. I wonder if they would be rumored to be in either the Keuchel market or go out obtain another quality arm such as a Bum.
cwhoswims
Are the Twins really a “surprise”? I didn’t read the post, just voted, but a lot of sources projected them around 84 wins, which is by no means bad.
I voted for them mostly because I’m a Twins fan, but they will need to address the bullpen, big time, if they are going to sustain their winning.
jbigz12
“Surprise” is kind of a reach on all these teams except the Mariners and maybe the Pirates to some degree.The padres are a game over .500. They’ve played 7/23 games against the giants. That’s helped that. The pirates have beat up on the weaker teams so far. The two series they’ve lost are to the best teams they’ve played the cards and nats. They’ve handled the reds,tigers and giants which has helped.
The mariners are the only team out of the bunch that it’s completely surprising to see what they’re doing right now given the injuries and the complete reconstruction of their roster. But it’s a good piece. It’s a little early but that’s by design.
jbigz12
I think the rangers should’ve gotten some consideration for this piece. To me, them being 12-8 is more surprising than the twins or the padres being a game above .500 right now.
spinach
Agreed, huge miss in the poll.
The Ranger Fan
Amen to that.
madmanTX
How is losing 2 of 3 to the Rangers this past weekend meeting expectations on the Astros?
The Ranger Fan
Exactly my point
indiansfan44
Really should of been an option for none of the above. Padres are young so it’s still too early tell if they can keep up the pace but I would expect them to be inconsistent as the players grow. It’s hard to pick the Pirates to win in that division with 3 teams that are better on paper than them. The Mariners feel like the Indians team in Major League. Thrown together and noone expects anything from them but could surprise. And if I have to pick one it’s the twins. They had good signings over the winter and were already a decent team before that. Add the week division and the Indians questions about if and how they will address them and it could happen but until they face teams not in the Central we won’t know.
Ketch
Twins. Easiest division.
heater
Twins aren’t really that big of a surprise. They should be better than last year and seem to have a good group of veterans to go with the young guys who have looked a little more polished so far this year. Now, if Sano could be consistent and show improvement when he comes back the offense could be a monster. To me, pitching is the wild card with this club.
smrtbusnisman04a
Last month EVERYONE was criticizing the Pirates management for not upgrading the roster. They predicted the Bucs would finish dead last and behind the REDs in the NL Central. Yes there are still holes but they are first in the NL Central at the moment and are only going to get stronger with Gregory Polanco coming off the DL and Mitch Keller getting promoted this summer!
Btw, how are the REDs doing right now?
jim stem
Not mentioned: Tampa Rays. No wants to admit that their starting pitching concept is better than any other teams’ 4th and 5th starters or that their players come to battle because they are being given a chance. More talent on the way. I’m impressed with managements conviction and confidence.