The Rangers have struck an extension with reliever Jose Leclerc, as first reported by Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News. Leclerc, who is represented by Munger English Sports Management, receives a $14.75MM guarantee over a four-year term. The Rangers will have a pair of options valued at $6MM (2023) and $6.25MM (2024).
Leclerc, 25, was still one season away from reaching arbitration eligibility, so this contract will provide him with no shortage of additional financial security. The organization, in turn, will lock in cost savings and certainty for a pitcher whose prospective earnings could have risen substantially with an ongoing accumulation of saves.
The new contract covers the 2019 season along with Leclerc’s three prospective arbitration-eligible campaigns. He’ll receive a $2MM signing bonus, followed by $1MM, $2.25MM, $4MM and $4.75MM salaries. There’s a $750K buyout on the club option years, which cover Leclerc’s first two potential free-agent seasons (the hurler’s age-29 and 30 seasons).
This deal comes on the heels of a breakout 2018 campaign in which Leclerc took over the Rangers closer’s role and established himself as one of the game’s most exciting young relievers. He ultimately worked to a 1.56 ERA in 57 2/3 innings with 13.3 K/9 and 3.9 BB/9.
Leclerc’s offerings — a mid-nineties heater and splitter, primarily — have always been tough to square up. In his first two looks at the big leagues, though, Leclerc did not command them. He dished out a whopping 53 free passes in his first 60 2/3 MLB innings.
Last year, Leclerc nearly halved his walk rate (from nearly twenty percent to 11.2%) while retaining his elusiveness. MLB hitters struggled badly in all respects. Leclerc maintained an excellent 17.1% swinging-strike rate, surrendered only 3.7 hits per nine, and allowed only a single long ball on the year. He was a Statcast darling, placing among the league leaders in wOBA-against (.205), xwOBA-against (.210), exit velocity (83.7 mph), and hard-hit percentage (20.0%).
There aren’t many comparable extensions for early-career relief pitchers — in large part because teams rarely feel compelled to commit future money to such players. In fact, among contracts documented in MLBTR’s Extension Tracker, this is actually only the second-ever deal that expanded a team’s control rights over a relief pitcher with more than two years of MLB service but not enough to qualify for Super Two status. Way back in 2011, the White Sox inked a three-year deal with Sergio Santos that promised him $8.25MM and came with three option years. His option seasons were valued at $6MM, $8MM, and $8.75MM, so there was a bit more overall earning power in that pact.
A pair of deal with two exceptional southpaw hurlers are also worth noting as comps. As a Super Two reliever, Felipe Vazquez secured $22MM in promised money while giving the Pirates control over two additional campaigns at $10MM each. That contract covered a similar arb/free agent span as Leclerc’s, but Vazquez had already reached arbitration eligibility — meaning his downside was protected because he was set to receive a significant salary and had established a high starting point for his arb years.
Before that, back in 2014, Sean Doolittle and the Athletics agreed to a deal that looks like the closest comp to Leclerc’s. At the time, Doolittle was one season away from highly likely Super Two qualification. He was promised $10.5MM, which boosted up to $13.5MM when he ultimately did have enough service time to join the Super Two class. That agreement came with $6MM and $6.5MM options. Doolittle was much older than Leclerc, presented a notable health risk, and was a season further away from free agency, though he was also arguably a higher-floor pitcher from a performance standpoint. As with Leclerc’s contract, the Doolittle deal bought out all of the seasons that were already under the club’s control (five in the A’s case) and did so at a point when the player was still a full season removed from arbitration eligibility. In each case, the team’s willingness to pay up was surely due to a combination of two overriding factors: first, a fear of run-away arb salaries; second, the rights to a pair of highly affordable option years.
While Leclerc’s contract doesn’t seem to break new ground, then, it’s still a nice deal for a player who did not originally sign for big money and has only earned at the league minimum to this stage of his career. Few relievers achieve this kind of contract precisely because the earning outlook is so uncertain — especially before reaching arbitration. Leclerc could well turn into a 40-save monster who would substantially out-earn his new deal. But he’s just one injury or a creeping command problem away from missing out on save opportunities and entering arbitration with fairly meager statistical record to work with.
Grant (Twitter links), MLB.com’s T.R. Sullivan (in a tweet), Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (Twitter link), and Jeff Wilson of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram (via Twitter) reported the contract terms.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
jbigz12
Could be a bargain. As long as he throws strikes. Seemed to turn the corner on that last season. But if you look at his career(majors or minors) before that it was always a big problem. Hopefully he’s found that consistency but depending on the figures there’s a good amount of risk in this.
cooper95
Great job, Texas. He is one of the best young pitchers on the team.
acarneglia
Good job by Texas to lock in their closer of the future long term
Strike Four
Texas aren’t going to be competitive at any point of this contract. It’s to boost his trade value, which it will.
bigkempin
It can potentially be for 6 years. They definitely can be competitive unless they completely FUBAR their rebuild.
Strike Four
“Potentially” isn’t definitely. It is plainly obvious that this is a mirror of the Doolittle sign and then later trade.
I like it for Texas don’t get me wrong, its a smart move, but there’s no way they are competing in the next 4 years UNLESS they make moves like this, locking in possibly-very valuable talent on not-large money deals for future trades for good prospects. So that comment of “lock in their closer of the future long term” is entirely wrong, they just made an asset even more valuable in a trade while they are in a non-contending window.
GeauxRangers
Uhh I think it’s asinine to say there’s no way they’re going to be competing in 4 years. They’ve traded for a lot of young but close to mlb ready talent of late and they are going to have a ton of financial flexibility very soon. It could go either way but the potential for them to be a good team in the next 3-4 years is definitely there.
ty11
Good move
Houston We Have A Solution
Increases his trade value significantly. Rebuilding clubs dont need elite pen arms. Could net Texas a huge prospect haul. Similar to what happened to brad hand.
brewcrew08
While I agree Leclerc is very solid I still think he needs to prove it for another season to start drawing comparisons to Hand trade value wise. Hand automatically starts with higher value since he’s a lefty. I do agree Leclerc could bring back a very solid rerun though.
AidanVega123
Yeah if I’m a team looking to acquire Leclerc, I’d be concerned about his past issues with issuing walks.
spinach
Should trade him this summer if he’s still good and they stink, would bring back a lot. Cubs or someone.
ReverieDays
The Cubs have a plethora of solid bullpen arms already and not “a lot” to give back in a deal.
canocorn
Thought at first the name was Simon Legree.
Robertowannabe
Leclerc-Saw the name and the first thing that popped into my head was the old M*A*S*H episode about the wounded soldier from Luxembourg..His name was Leclerc as well ” I thought he had died…….He got better.” great episode.
zachgwest
MASH episode? How old are you?
Robertowannabe
Old enough to remember watching M*A*S*H original episodes! Was the show to watch in college!
MWeller77
This is a terrible comment.
1) Nothing wrong with being old 2) In the Internet age, we can watch all sorts of shows that were on years before we were born
cpdpoet
Luxembourg thanks you for the mention…
bobtillman
Klinger: “This is the worst day of my life!”
Potter: “Don’t be silly, son. You’re young yet. You’re going to have much worst days than this one”.
Klinger: “Thank you, sir”.
Robertowannabe
LOL! another great line!
baseballhobo
Is he part Mexican and part French?
Lefty Grove’s right hand
Dominican Republic is next to Haiti, a former French colony.
Strike Four
Now trade him for an absolute haul.
DarkSide830
not a bad deal for a reliever in today’s market. (player-wise)
oaklandfan22
Solid deal from the Rangers perspective, this guy can pitch.
Yankeepatriot
His trade value just went up
bobtillman
Comment that this increases his trade value exponentially is spot on. Rangers don’t figure to need an impact closer for a while, but with that VERY team-friendly deal, they’ll get a ton (assuming continued performance).
Red Sox might even give Swihart……
oz10
But as the Rangers do get better and these young pitchers have chances at a win you want them to get it so that it helps build confidence. I know wins are a meaningless stat for a pitcher but it does instill confidence in young starters to get them.
HubcapDiamondStarHalo
I don’t generally buy into collusion or conspiracy theories…
That said, I think (at least until the CBA is renegotiated) that you’re going to see a LOT more of these contracts. The Yankees locked up Hicks for $70 million; $10 mil per year for that kind of talent (and during what are generally his most productive years) is a steal, especially by today’s numbers. The Rangers just locked up one of the more promising young relievers in the league, and if the options kick in, they get six seasons for a total of $27 million. Where does the collusion come in? I honestly think owners looked at what free agents were getting on the open market and combined it with advanced stat studies and came up with a plan to literally scare the young guys into signing undervalued contracts. Hicks and Leclerc most likely cost themselves a LOT of cash in the long run. I understand their motivation – outside of the microscope of baseball, they both should now be set and be able to comfortably care for their families for life. l get that. The owners, though, are pretty comfortable, and as is the norm, it sure seems like they’ve found a way to keep (justifiably) rising player salaries in check, at least to a degree.
jbigz12
Hicks was only due 6 this year so he got 64 MM for the next 6 essentially. He had no more arb seasons. He would’ve been entering FA at 30. Hicks really only has one full season of major league ABS in his back pocket and really scuffled his first 3 years. He may have been able to get himself more if he produced again this year but I’m assuming a guy who hasn’t made a ton in his career like Hicks realized the upside was probably 10-15 Million and the downside was a lot less. Not a bad deal for him at all I don’t believe
jbigz12
To add to that. We’ve seen the decline curve of CF’s once they get older and the wheels go. IE cutch, Jones. I can’t imagine any team would’ve valued him over the Lo Cain 5/80 in FA. he got himself a guarantee in between Cain and pollock which is pretty much where I’d value Hicks. It’s a good deal for the Yankees as well because at that price you can make him a fourth OFER down the line if it happens and you’re not really hurting.
Melchez
Hick’s health is the main question. He’s had a ton of talent but seems to always end up on the dl.
stymeedone
@hubcap
Not a lot of FA’s at age below 30 as things have been, which is why Bryce and Manny created such a stir. This contract covers his year of control, plus 2 options that may or may not have value. Other than cost certainty, this doesnt provide all that much extra to the team. He could easily revert to his career norms in the walk dept, and those $6MM options won’t hold a lot of value. LeClerc’s future holds promise but is far from a sure thing..
jbigz12
This extension is a lot more than cost certainty. It’s a potential bargain. The guaranteed money is less than they’re paying Smyly and Lynn for this season alone. If he reverts to not throwing strikes again then they’re out 14 mil spread over 4 seasons. He would’ve made more than that as a closer in arbitration if he would’ve produced anywhere close to the level he pitched at. This why this deal makes sense to the team every single time. This guy has made a little over a million bucks in his entire career so he’s obviously thrilled to see more come his way.
preauto
I’m thinking the Kimbrel camp is not pleased.
Strike Four
Why? They are in totally different phases of their careers. Leclerc is never going to get Kimbrel money right now. Maybe in 4-6 years, but if you think this contract means Kimbrel is not going to get a massive deal, you really don’t understand how the FA system works.
preauto
Yeah I guess you are probably correct. I just looked at it as 2 similar pitchers at(at least last year)….one getting 27 mil for 6 years and one asking for 100 mil for 6 years. I do realize they aren’t maybe comparable in that way..
The Ranger Fan
If I were an owner I too would make this deal to younger players to lock them up, I remember back in the seventies players stayed with teams for years unless they were traded, the owners are not colluding,they are just getting smarter. I for one am in favor of owners making some money,But I also believe the players should make money as well, but not the 300 million contracts. If the pay a fortune to the A-AA-AAA players what’s to say they won’t make their fortune and retire before reaching the majors. Let them put in the work to earns promotions to AAA and the majors so they can earn a little more,same as I did in the MARINES. Baseball needs caps on positions and minimum and maximum in the future to stay competitive. The End.
averagejoe15
No one is saying minor leaguers should be paid a fortune, just a living wage. As for players making $300M, why shouldn’t they? Where should MLB’s increasing revenue be going instead? The owners? The owners make plenty. The players should get their fair share as well whether its 50 or 55% of revenue or what have you. The money will still be distributed as teams see fit an players will still make $300M.
The put in your time to earn it doesn’t work well when you are in your physical prime but forced to take wages below your actual productivity. Earning your stripes is for professions and industries where experience and knowledge gained have more value than physical skills. That world is not professional sports.
Even if baseball had a cap players would still make $300M or more because the cap would be tied to revenue. If you mean player contracts should have caps they would still be tied to revenue in one way or another.
LosAngelesAngelesAngelesAngels
Great move by the Rangers.
bleacherbum
That is the Brad Hand/Raisel Iglesias deal
just waaaaaay better.
Leclerc is lights out and is now controlled for very cheap. Value just sky-rocketed. Aka he will be dealt at the deadline for a haul now that he is controlled at that rate.
Swinging Friars
Finally some good news for my keeper team
Coal tender
No doubt, the only bright spot (LeClerc) on the Ranger ballclub. A very parsimonious front office has suppressed the ability acquiring other “bright spots.” Seems present owners are only interested in appealing to potential new buyers to bear some of the operational costs in running this franchise.
oz10
Use the word parsimonious in a sentence to sound smart but then the structure of the sentence is so far off that you don’t.
And the Rangers have never shied away from spending. It just isn’t prudent right now.
holecamels35
24 hits in 50 innings seems hardly sustainable. If his control goes wild and a bit of luck goes the other way, he may not look so good.
Still, cheap enough deal to not matter. Especially if he closes, arb prices would be much higher.
soxski
Use Kimbrel to refute the players union being upset. 2017 Kimbrel was amazing in Boston but 16 and 18 he was a joke. 3R he did ok but 1R or tie games were an adventure. The playoffs were a good sample of his work all yr. Up 5-1 CK enters vs NYY and Sox win 5-4 w bases loaded after he gave up 3 Runs. This happened in Seattle and in LA. Plus we watched him get smoked and walk the world all yr. He was not worth the pieces we gave SDP for Kinbrel. Then he asks for 5/100. No one was going to come close and no one did. If he stayed around 5/55-60 he us signed quickly. Then their is Harper who turns down 10/300 as soon as FA begins not teams fault that spenders were waiting for Haeper and MN to sign. No baseball team should sign a player over 5 years let alone 10. History shows they dont work out for teams. NYY had Arod for 12 yrs 1 WSC. He was a hike which NYY ended up dushing 330 million over the duration while Texas paid a chunk for him to play 4 NY. Dont you think that Detrot Oriokes Angel’s would live 2 fund takers for Miggy Davis or Puljois Miggy has 6 yrs left of had baseball. I cant wait until Stantin hits 10yr make w 3 yrs remaining. Most expensive bench players ever. Pablo Hankey Fielder Hiward ARod all were paid to go home by the end of their deals. I’m sure ARod pictured fans crying when he retired w his numbered retired along w Bonds Jeter Selig friends family at Yankee stadium to cheers tears and gifts. Instead he was booed out if baseball. Bad bad bad. The rule should have 5 yr Max deals w incentives to bump pay up to 30 or 40 mm per yr. I vet owners wont mond paying 17
Million per yr and giving another 33mm if the player hits 40HR 135RBI or 200 kings 2.50 era 20 wins they will pay gladly. They fight salary bc they dont want to pay 40mm for a 214 avg 11HR 54RBI