The Cubs announced Monday that they’ve named former big league reliever Craig Breslow director of strategic initiatives in their baseball operations department. That, it seems, will put an end to a playing career that dates all the way back to the 2002 season for the 38-year-old Breslow, who spent the 2018 campaign pitching in the Blue Jays’ minor league ranks.
Per the Cubs’ release, Breslow “will help to evaluate and implement data-based processes throughout all facets of Baseball Operations” and will also “support the organization’s pitching infrastructure in Player Development and the major leagues.”
A Yale graduate with a degree in molecular biophysics and biochemistry, Breslow has long been heralded as one of the game’s brightest minds. The lefty spent parts of 12 seasons in the Major Leagues, pitching to a combined 3.45 ERA with 442 strikeouts against 226 walks in 570 2/3 innings. That body of work was spread out over seven organizations, including the Red Sox, Twins, Athletics, Indians, D-backs, Padres and Marlins.
Breslow enjoyed what was arguably his most successful season in the big leagues with the Red Sox back in 2013, when he tossed 59 2/3 innings of 1.81 ERA ball for the eventual World Series champions. That season marked Breslow’s lone year of postseason experience, assuredly making the ring he won all the more treasured.
Few, if any, can match Breslow’s combination of education and a playing career that spanned more than a decade and a half, so he’ll being a unique blend of skills and experience to a Cubs front office that is already regarded among the game’s most progressive groups. Best of luck to Breslow in the next chapter of his baseball journey.
FutureMiLBWife
Congratulations to him (: but i surely think they are just making up job titles now haha
marshmallowman
i’m just hoping utley gets the assistant to the regional GM position in philly one day
layventsky
Klentak should hire him as AGM just so he can say “Assistant TO the General Manager.”
southern lion
Brainiac should help the Pale Hose be a better team.
deweybelongsinthehall
Wrong Chicago team.
thisredsoxfan
The Cubs hired him not the White Sox!
axisofhonor25
Wrong Chicago team, but the White Sox do have a brainiac in their organization by the name of Chris Getz, director of player development. He’s done some good things in helping develop the minor league talent.
The Human Toilet
Moncada has been amazing so far
MrStealYoBase
He spent like 3 months in the Sox farm
Art Fay
The Cubs have one of baseball’s most progressive front offices? Can anybody in “the know” cite some evidence?
All I see is a super rich team that tanked despite having huge financial resources and then spent over half a billion dollars to win a World Series. Now it looks like those prospects are mostly busts and they have an aging pitching staff that costs more ($130M) than most entire payrolls. All they’ve done is spend more than anybody else since 2015. What am I missing?
I’m an A’s fan so I’m not biased against the cubs. I just don’t see “progressive” in the body of work. BTW, super happy for Breslow. Good guy to root for.
sufferforsnakes
Progressive doesn’t necessarily mean smart.
wrigleywannabe
I’m guessing you work with Flo.
Djones246890
True. In today’s world “Progressive” means “moron.” If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Not everything has to “progress.”
Bryzzo2016
Hmmm, busts? Hahaha, KB won College Player of the year, the next year – MiLB player of the year, the next year MLB ROY, the next year MVP and won a ring. Almora, already graduated to the big club, won a ring… was key in game 7. Schwarber, again graduated to the big club and was key in the WS win, Happ… (see a theme here) graduated to the big club and won a ring. Soooo those are Theo’s 1st round picks since he got here. Zero busts, all key MAJOR LEAGUE contributors. What other team has successfully graduated ALL their 1st round picks in that time span? Exactly
stan lee the manly
That’s not really a fair comment because a lot of teams weren’t losing every season to draft at the very top of the first round time and time again. There was a lot less risk with the players the Cubs took because they had higher-quality players available to them than most of the other major league teams picking lower in the first rounds.
wrigleywannabe
That’s how it works.
They hit far more than other teams and the guy said they were mostly busts.
It’s fair.
iceman35pilot
The Cubs won more games every year from 2012 when Theo took over up through 2016.
Art Fay
Hey man, I wasn’t trying to insult you personally. Sorry if I did. I personally think Schwarber, Almora, Russell & Happ are closer to BUSTS than ALL-STARS at the moment. All four of those guys have pretty much zero trade value.
Drafting Bryant was not smart- it was a no-brainer. I’m sure 28 other teams wished they tanked and were picking at No. 2 that year.
The irony of it all is that when it’s all said and done, the best guys on the team might end up coming from Jim Hendry, the previous GM (Contreras & Baez).
All they’ve really done is outspend every other team. It’s not that impressive. And now they are about to be in a serious jam because of it.
adkuchan
“closer to BUSTS than ALL-STARS” Not hardly. Only about 65% of 1st round picks ever don a MLB uniform. Guys who find themselves consistently in the lineup, especially for a playoff team, are FAR from busts.
You are also missing several trades the team made to build its current roster. Andrew Cashner for Anthony Rizzo. Scott Feldman for Jake Arietta and Pedro Strop. Ryan Dempster for Kyle Hendricks.
I am not sure what “serious jam” you are referring to. They won’t have trouble keeping the guys they want to keep. They are in line for a HUGE TV deal after this season, and renovations in and around Wrigley field are nearly completed. These will open up vast new revenue streams for the team.
wrigleywannabe
So, now if you aren’t an All Star you’re a bust?
You said most of them were bust, not 4.
Teams constantly ask about Schwarber, just stop.
Number 2 guys bust all the time. Other teams do what they did.
It’s a way to get better. You still have to hit on the picks.
There are other teams with higher payrolls.
Lester, Darvish and Heyward are the hig money guys, they outbid people on. Zo is on a decent contract
Other guys were drafted or traded for, with drafted guys like Cease, Jimenez and Torres. Again, just stop.
I do apologize for misunderstanding your original tanked remark. Unfortunately, some people claim they floundered last year.
By the way,they’re not in a jam.
Zo and Hamels are gone after this year. Lester follows. Money is there.
mga2q7
Schwarber, Almora & Happ have no trade value? You must be joking or blinded by bias. How are contributing pieces of an annually competitive team considered anywhere close to busts? They dont have to be all stars to successful picks.
mistry gm
yah right, that’s why every team in both leagues wants Schwarber. Almora will be great this year and without major health problems they will have one of the top rotations in baseball. my guess is that WITHOUT Harper, 102 wins. Try actually watching them this year
megaj
If you actually think Kyle Schwarber has “zero” trade value, you have absolutely no freaking clue about anything MLB related and should probably just refrain from posting again. Just about EVERY team would love to get Schwarber. Even the Yankees have tried the last couple of seasons and they have a loaded outfield already. His biggest problem is how he has been coached the last two seasons. First he is asked to leadoff, then they bench him every other day, then they won’t let him face lefties. Give the guy 500 + at bats, and you can pencil in 30+ homers, and an .800+ OPS EVERY year. Oh yeah, and a common misconception is that he sucks on defense. He only had 1 error in the field ALL of last year with 11 assists, and he keeps getting better.
wrigleywannabe
They are talking about analytical use of data.
95 wins is tanking? You’re an idiot.
Baez is not a bust. Bryant and Contreras are not. Schwarber is not. Hendricks is not. Almora is not. Jiminez, now gone, looks great, as does Cease.
Who are these MOSTLY busts? Happ and Russell?
I’d wait a year on Happ, but I’d give you Russell, right now.
That’s hardly most of them. They were not all expected to he stars.
Heck, Rizzo was a struggling prospect when they got him.
Strop and Arrieta had their careers saved by the Cubs.
Can’t forget Rondon.
It’s not all drafting, which they’re fine at.
Heck, the biggest bust was the guy drafted by Oakland.
Look, they’ve hit onnguys from other teams and before the completion of this front office.
Some ofvthose carriedcover and developed. That shows how goid the organization is
cards81
Lol he wasn’t talking about when the cubs finally stopped tanking and started winning…the guy makes very good points..it’s easy to draft from the top and have success…the cardinals do way better at drafting than most and certainly better than the cubs…the cardinals are a very progressive team…most teams have copied MOs model of developing players and using the farm…the Red Sox…Yankees…dodgers have all started doing what the cardinals have been doing for years
mga2q7
What? Cheating by hacking into other team’s resources?
cards81
Lol I’m not getting into that…everyone knows it was one person..and the cardinals didn’t gain anything from it…good try though
daved
If you think Chris Correa acted “on his own”, then I have some land in Times Beach to sell you. He took the fall and kept his mouth shut. I’m guessing there is an offshore account with 7 figures deposited in it for him when he gets out.
cards81
Dave shut up…stay off my post…troll somewhere else bud
daved
Cards81, it might be time for you to find somewhere else to post if you don’t like others to comment.. I’ll stay right here.
daved
It is amusing.. I guess some of us aren’t entitled to an opinion?
theoepsteinhof
Hilarious that a Cards fan is a Cub commenter accusing others of “trolling” him! Lmao for the sad redbird fan.
cards81
First if you understood this guy Dave then you would know why I said that…second do you guys really come on here just to call others names? I mean really grow up…I’m guessing your pretty immature especially using the term “St. Loser”and “red turd…had to reach deep to pull those out huh… how original lol grow up
daved
I’m trying to figure out where I called you a “name”
Bryzzo2016
Gotta love the irony. Anyway, MANY have tried what the Cubs/Astros have done, VERY few succeeded. Theo also did it in Boston, in fact, much of the core that just won in Boston are courtesy of Theo.
cards81
Well the braves seem to be doing a good job of it…San Diego sounds like they are doing a pretty good job…I’m not saying what they did, tank, wasn’t a good idea…it was a great idea…very true about Theo…his last draft class for the Red Sox are a lot of the stars on the Red Sox…although he didn’t develop them…and also Luhnow was a protege of Mo before moving on to Houston
cards81
Also…Dave I wasn’t talking about you…how do you not see that…geez Dave
daved
Luhnow was NOT a protege of Mozeliak. Good Lord! He was brought in 2003 under Jocketty’s watch, then ran circles around Mo so much that Mo instructed Correa to hack into Luhnow’s computer. Protege? Far from it.
cards81
Really lol that is so not true…you need to give Mo some credit…he is the reason cardinals draft so well
daved
It’s absolutely true. I wouldn’t expect you to understand.
theoepsteinhof
Lmao at people who think the Cubs tanked. You have to be good first before you can tank! They struggled for decades so “tanking” was their regular M.O.! They had high draft picks for decades and consistently failed! What they did was get someone who built a front office full of excellent evaluators, thus the great picks from ‘11 thru ‘16.
Due to poor management and acting as a Tribune Co. pawn, Cubs never had the resources to use as they did when Ricketts finally hired Epstein.
Stop trying to tear down success. The A’s have had theirs and still do have one of those “progressive” FO that you don’t understand the value of.
cards81
They tanked dude…there is no way around it…the cubs tanked
petrie000
No, they just stunk when Theo took over.
theoepsteinhof
So the Cardinals have been tanking since ‘15? After all, their fall from the top of the division is more dramatic than the Cubs bouncing around the bottom all those years.
cards81
That makes zero sense? The Cardinals have had a winning record and has always competed till the end every year…good try…the never purposely put a bad team on the field to lose on purpose so they could have top draft picks…never once
Android Dawesome
Tanked is a made up word used by people with a low baseball IQ to try and sound smart.
daved
Yes the Cards do compete. It’s the term Mozeliak and Dewitt use every year. They don’t say, “build a team to win a WS”. They say, “we want to compete”.
cards81
INFORMAL•US
fail completely, especially at great financial cost.
It’s not made up actually…and plus ask anyone in baseball…mlb tv will even tell you the cubs tanked…I guess they have low baseball IQ
theoepsteinhof
Nor did the Cubs. They were historically bad year after year. How do you tank with that history?
Cachhubguy
Haters gonna hate.
petrie000
With all the strange things you see, you have a bright future as an umpire….
amishthunderak
Yeah, but they won the World Series.
jb226
Saw him on MLB Network a few weeks ago, very smart guy. If he can better translate some of the analytics coming out of the front office into something the players can understand and utilize based on being only a few months removed from playing, it should be a good hire regardless of the weird title.
petrie000
The biophysics degree should also help him find ways to translate the raw data into useable coaching or training techniques
Carrington Spensor
……and so many of you wonder why franchise expenses keep going up resulting in players getting a smaller share of revenues.
“Director of strategic initiatives”.
?
Personnel flying all over the world looking for players. Computers everywhere – installation; maintenance; MBA’s querying data, etc. And front office advisers tripping over one another.
The beauty of baseball is slowly ebbing away each year by over-educated people doing reverse engineering, along with ex-players playing mind-games – all dressed in casual clothing that cost more then hand-tailored suits and dropping ever-changing buzzwords which are now the credential.
lol
davidcoonce74
Oh man. I bet you hated color TV and when the movies started talking too. Jeez, get off this absurd tilting at windmills.
TwinsTrio
But the rabbitt ears on top of the tv…. and the horizontal and vertical hold buttons…. you make me feel old !
Carrington Spensor
davidcoonce74
Actually stereotyper, I spent over 35 years working with computers from system development to management.
I always hated the mystique so many created to make their positions appear far more important then they were.
The excess in MLB’s use of “technology” long ago passed the sweet spot of ‘The Law of Diminishing Returns’. Currently it’s all about empire building.
mike 96
cubs suck go atanta
wrigleywannabe
Learn to spell
HubcapDiamondStarHalo
And capitalize…
mistry gm
whether or not I agree with you, congratulations, you are a true fan , but … go Cubs.
davidcoonce74
Smart team hires smart guy to work in smart front office. News at 11. No, but seriously, always liked this guy; survived a reasonably decent amount of time with below-average stuff, probably helped that he understood biomechanics so well. I do remember watching him pitch, that he had a somewhat unorthodox delivery – he hid the ball well and it looked like it was coming out from behind his left ear; unlike a lot of lefty relievers, he was much more over the top. He also had a great pickoff move from what I recall. Good for him. He put up 7 WAR in his career, which is actually pretty good for a LOOGY and made 15 million dollars. And he was born on my birthday! (Same day, not same year)
BobbyJohn
“A Yale graduate with a degree in molecular biophysics and biochemistry, Breslow has long been heralded as one of the game’s brightest minds.”
Ya think?
abravesfan 2
Being a fellow Yale alum, I have read a few times the stories about Breslow thinking about using his molecular biology degree when his MLB career is over. I guess that’s apparently on hold still until after his baseball front office career. Then again, he’s been approaching his pitching scientifically in the late stages of his career using advanced stats.
Carrington Spensor
I’m sorry,
I surely respect a molecular biology degree from an Ivy League school.
But the purpose in MLB?
As a living-legend baseball-genius Mr. Epstein, has surrounded himself with advanced degreed collegians from the very best schools. OK. So explain how with all these resources, the Cubs gave astronomical contracts to Tyler Chatwood, Yu Darvish, and Jason Heyward. They were so bad that daddy (Tom Ricketts) had to take his allowance away. Perhaps Mr. Breslow will prevent these disastrous signings in the future.
The thing is, I don’t have a graduate degree from an Ivy League school, yet I rolled my eyes at those contracts. Think I’m a second-guesser? I’d give Machado and Harper 4 years /$115m, with a team option for a fifth year at $30m. They may be All-Stats, but they’re hardly “superstars”. The contracts they’re going to get may not be as bad as the Cubs contracts are, but they’ll still handcuff their new teams FO faster then most will realize.
wrigleywannabe
Jealoys much?. None of
those deals were out of line for the demand. The Cards offered more to Heyward.
Their deals will be far worse even with every orher team employing the same type of guys.
Carrington Spensor
Jealoys?
lol
HubcapDiamondStarHalo
Hey, there’s always room for jealoys.
bobtillman
Fifteen years ago, Andrew Zimmerman, the prize winning economist from Amherst College, estimated that it cost about 50M to actually “run” a MLB team, independent of payroll. All the technological advancements SHOULD have brought those costs down; you don’t need switchboard operators anymore; you don’t need Minor League scouts, all you need is a $50 a year subscription to MiLB-TV. Etc., etc., etc.
But teams now claim it costs 100M to run their teams. It boils down to paying your gobs of income to Uncle Sam, or hiring Craig Breslow, which of course is another “cost of sales”.
That leads to all kinds of absurdities. The Rays chronically cry poor mouth, but just bought a soccer franchise. So you can’t pay your own mortgage, but you can buy another house. Oh……
Ultimately the tragedy is that fans buy into it, which is kind of like being forced to buy the drugs that will be used in your lethal injection.
The 2021 CBA negotiations are going to be incredibly ugly……
wrigleywannabe
You still need scouts
bobtillman
Amateur scouts, yes. But “pro scouts” have gone the way of the Hula Hoop. The Astros actually have virtually disbanded the department.
And even amateur scouting has changed dramatically….more video, more “tournaments” where the prime prospects gather, etc. All of it doesn’t result in BIG savings; scouts were always notoriously underpaid, their travel expenses eating up most of the scouting budget. But it’s a cost that’s been severely rendered non-essential.
petrie000
No, they haven’t. Scouts are just as important in a sabermetric world as they were before, if not more so.
The computers might tell the teams which players fit the profile they need, but then a scout has to go and actually look at the player and evaluate his future potential.
The only thing about scouting that’s fundamentally different is the Scouts are no longer the ones ‘finding’ the guys. A good scout in today’s game is an incredibly valuable resource
Carrington Spensor
bob,
What you’re missing is the costs of wiring up parks to make the videos. Then skilled people have to watch and/or program those videos.
As you noted, scouts have always been underpaid. But skilled computer people and their hardware/software are not cheap. Additionally, like baseball and every other discipline, there are talented people and incompetent ones.
The argument is that an organization may increase their budget by 1X, but they’re getting back 5X in quality.
But I do agree that empires are being built for no reason. When you spend 5X to get information and it’s worth 1X to you, then there’s a problem.
MLB has overdone technology. Still need experienced baseball people to analyze the data insofar as how it impacts baseball decisions.
bobtillman
That they’re getting a “1X” return” on their investment is precisely my point. Let’s remember these owners aren’t dumb folks. In days past, some indeed were (inheritance, etc.). No reasonable business person is going to make that error. So that when they do so, there must be an alternative explanation.
We’re still pretty much in the Dark Ages (well, most teams are) when it comes to using the new tech and metrics in a productive manner. You know as well as anyone (based on your work experience) that data by itself is just data, conclusive of nothing. It’s the understanding of the universe in which the data occurred that’s paramount. In many organizations, the new metrics are the shiny new toy that the 5 year old can’t figure out what it is.
And I don’t curse the owners for making the money they’re making; God bless ’em, they rolled the dice and collected the pot. It just drives me nuts when fans are forced to accept poor product because of totally fictitious cries of poverty. Yes, there are income disparities in MLB, as there are everywhere. Your candy store in Podunck Iowa isn’t going to generate the same revenue as the same store in Times Square. But chances are pretty good you paid a lot less for the store in Podunck.
But that’s simply not an excuse. Dropping back a year or two to “rebuild”? Sure, been going on for centuries, across all forms of sports (and business). But these 5-year rebuilding falsifications are just marketing ploys, nothing more. Simply a way to rob a fan whose probably paid for the venue in which he sits. But that’s another story.
User 4245925809
Was a time at MiLB games would see 1-2 every single game behind HP alone and sometimes several seated in stands in a cluster together. Those days are gone. Maybe 1..2 a game at most now tops.
Either it’s all teams being cheap (my vote) or gone to video is the reason.
Carrington Spensor
B I N G O
Wow, bob!
I believe Dave Dombrowsi recently said that when he was first a GM he had something like 45 people reporting to him. Now he has close to 500.
There’s an old saying – lawyers flock to piles of money like flies flock to poop. Look at Washington, DC.
MLB may be generating record revenues, but every year more and more goes out to ancillary people that make up jobs for themselves. Same as the bureaucracy in Washington, DC.
Seriously, why does it take almost 500 people to support a 25-man roster, and maybe 150 players in the minors (less then when Dombrowski started)? And gobs of those people have backgrounds that have nothing at all to do with baseball.
its_happening
It was only 45 because he worked for the Expos, and employees feared falling beams inside the Olympic Stadium offices. Or that they were the Expos.
Cubs making up a job title to get this guy into the organization and maybe into the conference room when they have player personnel meetings.
Seems like a lot of people owners have to pay a salary to. That means they better generate revenue. Do the math; that’s costly.
Carrington Spensor
TrimReaper,
Our Director once hired a physics major with an advanced degree from Cal Tech. He came from ‘The Jet Propulsion Laboratory’ They send rockets into space. He took over a department of 10-12 people that were ecstatic, telling me they were “going to learn so much”. Within 2-3 weeks the people were despondent. They had no idea what he was talking about, he had no idea what they dealt with daily.
People generating revenue is not the issue. Paying me $100k a year and giving me a $50k budget for overhead and expenses is a losing proposition if I’m generating $40k a year in additional revenue. That’s what’s happening in MLB today. They have passed the apex of ‘The Law of Diminishing Returns’. This may go on for a while, but something will happen and the bottom will fall out (possibly the new CBA?). The smart money – a la JP Morgan – is happy with their profit and is selling here……..”leaving something for the next guy”. They may buy back in 10-15 years at a much lower cost.
its_happening
Sorry Carrington, my last comment was mainly for the people on this site that seem to think the only cost of running a baseball team goes to the players. They do not seem to grasp the concept of having to take care of the people surrounding the organization from top to bottom, thus the 500 people comment regarding Dombrowski.
As for the job situation….I can’t answer that. But for those wondering where some of the revenue is going, it would be in other areas beyond the 40-man roster.
Every MLB team is looking for a edge, obviously. However, seems many are looking in the same direction. Certain teams have stubborn management, where they feel strongly about a philosophy that bites them every October. Without a desire to change their thinking the same result will occur, most likely.
msqboxer
You can have all the analytics you want, but none of those guys try to square up a barrel of a bat to a 95mph fast ball. These guys are SCOUTS….analyst of this or that just sounds better.
refereemn77
This guy was a serviceable pitcher and is known by many as the smartest man in baseball. He’d be a great addition to any FO.
Priggs89
Good hire. Maybe Theo will finally be able to draft and develop a starting pitcher.
Konerko 4 Prez
Why is this story tagged to the White Sox page?
sjsoder
What kind of ring did Ian Happ win, because it wasn’t a World Series ring.