Jan. 22: Allen will earn $250K upon reaching both 35 and 40 games finished, Heyman tweets. He’ll receive $500K for reaching 45, 50 and 55 games finished, and he’ll also receive a $500K assignment bonus in the event that he is traded.
Jan. 20: The deal is official, Jon Heyman of Fancred tweets. The incentives are for $2MM, not $2.5MM, Jeff Fletcher of the Southern California News Group reports.
Jan. 18: Allen will be guaranteed $8.5MM and can earn another $2.5MM based on his number of games finished, Rosenthal tweets. It’s a straight one-year deal with no options, which will allow Allen to re-enter the market next offseason — hopefully on the heels of a rebound campaign. The signing is still pending a physical.
Jan. 17: The Angels have reportedly secured a one-year deal with veteran reliever Cody Allen. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (Twitter link) first indicated that something may be in place, while ESPN.com’s Jeff Passan and Alden Gonzalez (Twitter links) reported that terms had indeed been agreed to.
The Meister Sports Management client will need to pass a physical before the deal is official. If and when that comes to pass, it seems he’ll earn something in the realm of $9MM, though that’s not fully clear. Incentive pay could also be a feature, though that too has yet to be reported. Neither is it yet known whether the pact includes an option, though Passan suggests that’s also a possibility.
Notably, Rosenthal indicates that Allen was specifically seeking an opportunity to function as a closer — a role he has a rather clear path to in Anaheim. By prioritizing the opportunity over the total length and guarantee, he could hope to bounce back and reenter the market next winter in search of a bigger deal. Prior to his messy 2018 campaign, after all, Allen had seemed on track for a sizable, multi-year pact in free agency.
This time last year, Allen had just agreed to a $10MM deal to avoid arbitration in his final season with the Indians. He had long since laid claim to the team’s closer role. In total, as of the conclusion of the 2017 season, Allen had run up 373 2/3 innings of 2.67 ERA pitching with 11.7 K/9 against 3.4 BB/9 and 122 games saved.
With an immaculate record of durability, ample high-leverage experience, and consistently robust velocity readings and swinging-strike rates, Allen had all the makings of a top free agent closer. He was due to hit the market at a relatively youthful thirty years of age. That version of Allen might reasonably have looked to a contract like the Mark Melancon deal as a floor in free agency.
Instead, things went south in 2018. It was hardly a complete disaster, as Allen was healthy enough to make seventy appearances and save 27 ballgames while showing many of the same skills he always had. But it was a thoroughly diminished version of the hurler in many regards.
For starters, Allen averaged a career-low 94.0 mph with his fastball — a notable, though hardly monumental, decline from his typical levels. Whether that was the root cause isn’t entirely clear, but opposing batters seemingly found it easier to fight off his sliders; their contact rate on balls out of the zone jumped from below fifty percent (as low as 44.3% in 2017) all the way up to 56.9% last year. Ultimately, Allen recorded a 12.7% swinging-strike — his lowest since he became the closer for the Indians — while hard contact soared to 38.4% and he coughed up nearly a homer and a half per nine innings.
That’s not to say that all is lost. Perhaps Allen can rediscover a bit of juice on his heater, or otherwise adjust. He did end up being a bit unlucky, with Statcast crediting him with a .306 xwOBA that lagged the .323 wOBA that hitters produced against him. Things certainly didn’t end on a promising note, as Allen was bombed in two postseason appearances, but he may only be a mechanical adjustment or restful winter away from clicking back into gear.
The Halos, clearly, will take a roll of the dice on a return to form. As with rotation additions Matt Harvey and Trevor Cahill, the organization clearly hopes to unearth some gems — or, at least, pick up some solid innings at a reasonable price — without tampering with its post-2019 balance sheet. Allen is certainly a reasonable risk, with clear upside, though the pitching unit as a whole still underwhelms on paper.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
JM10ANGELS
I like this, finally a reliever Angels!!
Core4
Paying 9mill for Allen, coming off a bad season, and u like? Would rather see guys within system get shot, then guys like Allen and Harvey making damn good money. Wouldn’t of gave this guy more then 4mill
chrisbluediamond
Bad season he says
PhilliesFan012
His season was poor by his standards but his ceiling is high, good signing for a “bounce back candidate”
thecalhounkid
He had 3 games where he gave up 13 ER in 1.2 innings. Take away those and it was a solid year.
colonel flagg
Take away three games where he gave up 0 ER and his year looks worse.
petfoodfella
Sure, but it looks better if you take away the 1.2 innings and 9 ER’s vs the games where he gave up 0 ER in 3 innings.
his ERA was 4.70
take away those 9 and it’s 3.31
take away 3 games of 0 ER and it’s 4.92
His point stands, take away those 1.2 innings and 9 ER’s and his season is pretty solid.
rez2405 2
Excellent response
Bernie's Dander
“Take away all his bad games and he was really good!”
colonel flagg
Numbers sure are fun aren’t they.
Polish Hammer
Yeah there were sooooo many bad ones, all three…
canocorn
Take away the IRS and my pay is pretty good.
Fanof29teams
Is it your money?
Alfred E Neuman
@Core4: You wouldn’t HAVE GIVEN him more than 4 million. LOL, as if it’s your money they’re spending.
Equinsu Ocha
Finally someone else notices “would of”
Stevil
Allen had two bad months: July and August. He was still effective against RHH’s in general and he’ll be in a division of pitcher-friendly stadiums.
LA’s moves may not make sense to you, but it makes sense for everyone who understands how little depth they have and injury-prone their pitching staff collectively has been.
They had to find external options and none of these deals are restrictive for the long-term.
mike thomas
oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh kayyyyyyyyyyyyy! Hope he does well!
baseballdad37
They had relievers! They just didn’t sign the ones they had!
thewalltakethaway
One-year deal!
JayRyder
Great Bounce Back Candidate. . . I think his bad year was free agent nerves. Bad team. Bad bullpen all around. And over usage from postseason play… This guy could save 40 next year with a 2.5 ERA…
throwinched10
I wouldn’t call Cleveland a bad team.
He had a rough year and so did Miller. That’s the only way it needs to be summed up.
coldbeer
He could also win the Powerball lottery.
macstruts
It’s not a bad team. If you believe it is, you don’t know very much about baseball.
i like al conin
It’s a .500 team. Mediocre bullpen, rotation full of nos. 3, 4, 5 starters and an infield of Cozart, Simmons, Fletcher and Bour. Bleh.
BlueJayFan1515
They were talking about the Indians, I believe.
mike thomas
Whats wrong with Simmons Loke?
EndinStealth
Try to keep up. The topic was the Indians.
bucketbrew35
Simmons? The SS with the All-World glove that has accumulated 17.4 bWAR in the last three seasons? I’d kill to have him on the Phillies and they already have Jean Segura.
Vizionaire
you compare segura to simmons? lol!
Stevil
Oakland made won a ton of games with a rotation full of number 3, 4, and 5 starters.
Weird that you’re sour on Simmons. He’s one of the best SS’s in the game and by far the best defensively. Cozart is great when healthy, and while you may think Fletcher is bad, he only played half a season and still produced around 2 WAR. Excellent defense at 2B and 3B. Most teams would be perfectly comfortable with their infield as long as Pujols isn’t factored in at 1B.
I’m not even an Angels’ fan, but it isn’t hard to see how they’ve tightened up.
jbigz12
Cozart was a fine SS who typically relied on his fine defense at SS to drive up his value. 2017 was a clear aberration in his career at the plate. Can he be league average offensively? Yeah, maybe so but he graded out piss poor at 3B defensively in his first go round. Fletcher has no power and very little speed. He does a pretty decent job putting his bat on the ball. But those types of guys are rarely ideal starters. It certainly wouldn’t have hurt to add a MIF or another outfielder to the mix. There’s still time to do so though.
jbigz12
Cleveland a good team with a typically good bullpen. Way off there. Allen doesn’t have the injury excuse miller had to blame for his struggles but he does have a very strong track record. I’d roll the dice on him.
sufferforsnakes
Hmmm, so 91 wins is bad?
Tim Newport
When you play against the AL central where all the other teams are tanking it’s nothing to write home about.
sufferforsnakes
Uh, they do play teams from other divisions. But go ahead and keep hating.
socalbball
Indians were 49-27 against the weak competition in the Central, and 42-44 against everyone else.
Randia
Sufferfortribe. The Indians played more than half their games against teams with a cumulative .387 winning percentage. 88 out of 162 so you’re dead wrong. No team in major league history had an easier schedule.
JayRyder
Agreed. Bad team. Kluber great. Bauer and the starters. Kept them afloat. They tanked. Period. And weren’t going to win any rings. . . In my book that’s the ultimate prize. Not 91 Wins in a bad division and saying they Weren’t Bad. !
macstruts
Bad team vs best team in a bad division? The Indians are far from a bad team.
MLBTRS
“Indians were 49-27 against the weak competition in the Central, and 42-44 against everyone else”.
DUH! Good trams SHOULD beat up on their weaker opponents and play .500 against the better teams. To claim that the Indians are a “bad team” is just plain stupid. You obviously don’t know much about baseball.
El Kabong
This is why baseball should do away with the unbalanced schedule forth forth by divisions and just have 1-15 standings in each league (a la the NBA). The Rays were better than the Indians last year, but missed the playoffs. Not a Ray fan, by the way. In fact, I concede that my Dodgers figure to benefit from the unbalanced schedule in 2019. Three NL West teams are in rebuild mode, meaning they will be weak opponents. The Dodgers and Rockies will both play those teams 57 times. Meanwhile, each of the other two divisions have four teams trying to win. Unfair advantage for the Dodgers and Rockies, who figure to take the division title and one of the wild cards due to all those games against the Dbacks, Giants and Padres. That means the other eight teams trying to win will be competing for three spots.
socalbball
The point of my post was not that the Indians were a bad team (I’m not the one who said that), but that they benefited tremendously from the unbalanced schedule by playing almost half of their games against very bad teams. The Rays won 90 games, one less than the Indians. The Rays were 17-9 against the Twins, Tigers, White Sox and Royals. If the Rays had played anything close to the number of games against those weak teams that the Indians did, the Rays would undoubtedly have had a better record than the Indians. The Angels won only 80 games; they were 19-9 against the Twins, Tigers, White Sox and Royals. If they had played almost half their games against that level of competition, the Angels would probably have won around 90 games last year. The Indians were an okay team that benefited from playing many more games against terrible teams than any other decent team in the league did.
panickingcalmly
Up until the 1960s, MLB didn’t even have divisions. If MLB went back to that, there’d be no best of 5 LDS. You’d just pick the two best teams from each league, have a LCS, then a WS. Out of 30 teams, only 4 of them would make the postseason.
El Kabong
They could have two 15 teams leagues with the top two teams in each league getting bye’s. Three through six play best-of-threes with the winners advancing to play the top two teams.
El Kabong
socalball, I would be in favor of scrapping the unbalanced schedule, conceding that my Dodgers would benefit from the unbalance in 2019. No one should benefit from playing in a weak division, or suffer because they play in a powerhouse one.
Randia
Lysander, No you don’t know much. Math can be your guide, They played more than half their games against teams with a .387 winning percentage which means (88 games) they should have on average won 54 of them that also means they went 37-37 against teams with a winning percentage over.387. Not over .500 mind you but over .387. That translates to a 66-96 record. So that means the Indians were a 500 team against anyone other than the Whitesox, tigers, Twins, Royals, Orioles, and Rangers. The Indians most assuredly were a bad team.
Their schedule was the EASIEST in the HISTORY of baseball. And if you equalize their opponents to 500, the should have won 103 games with that schedule. So yes they were a bad team
JayRyder
Thank You. !!!
BobSacamano
I blame the Cleveland fan base, or lack there of. What is their owner suppose to do? This team last two seasons had a WS caliber team and yet those attendance numbers? It’s very unfortunate. I hope they eventually move this team to New Orleans, Virginia, Tennessee, or Vegas.. Francona and Co (scouts/coaches/management) would do exceptionally well!
canocorn
We can’t all be dropped off by limo and head to our boxes.
BobSacamano
Yupp that’s it.
allweatherfan
Bounce back
Knowthemarket
Bad team? He isn’t on a better one now, so…
bigkempin
Over usage from postseason play? He threw 5.1 innings over 4 games in the 2017 playoffs. If over usage was an issue he would’ve had a terrible 2017 after throwing all those playoff innings in 2016.
andrewgauldin
I prefer Brach, as I feel like he may be cheaper. However Allen might be the safer bet in having a bounce back season. Either way, I’m glad the angels are doing something with their pen. Good move, time to get a lefty.
jbigz12
I might not have a clear view on this but I never liked Bradh as a closer. He routinely filled in in Baltimore and it was shaky. If I needed a closer I’d go Allen all day everyday. No issues with Brach as a set up man but seeing him close games was not ideal. Of course he was filling in for one of the best around at the time in Britton so that certainly didn’t help.
DTD
Brach isn’t very good, more luck than anything. He gave me ulcers with the Braves.
connormiller57
Wow one year shocking
AzMike
Big upside potential for what should be a reasonably priced one year contract
stymeedone
“…and they can flip him at the deadline.”
thecoffinnail
Or give him a QO if he finds his old form and they are in the hunt late into the season.
stymeedone
not too many closers going for the QO amount of 18MM/year. Go right ahead.
Le Grande Orangerie
A poor risk in my view. Allen will not significantly affect the Angels’ results this year, which don’t look to include the playoffs. They will likely be able to flip him at the deadline but if he is injured or performs subpar it’s a lot of money to risk getting nothing at all for..
gstarrett
How do you know it’s a lot of money? Bounce back candidates don’t usually cost a crippling amount.
macstruts
They won’t make the playoffs? Pick the 5th AL playoff team. I bet the Angels have a better Record.
Philliesfan4life
If the angels can have a healthy rotation , they can honestly be a serious playoff contender, thats what hurt them last year like the previous 5 years. Ever since the hamilton contract, they have had a dark clooud over them with injuries.
macstruts
Previous three years. Five years ago the Angels had the best record in baseball.
Ronk325
Yankees, Red Sox, Rays, Indians, Astros, and A’s will all have better records than the Angels this season. The Angels will once again miss the playoffs
macstruts
So your 5th would be the A’s or the Rays? Pick one, the Angels will have a better record.
Ronk325
Most likely the A’s but both will have a better record than the Angels
HalosHeavenJJ
A’s have no rotation as of today.
I think the Rays are a better team than the Angels but play the YankSux monster a combined 38 times. The schedule favors the Angels there.
The schedule could really favor the Twins if they’d get a decent squad together.
YourDaddy
Angels win-loss record
baseball-reference.com/teams/ANA/
mike thomas
yes 3 years of pitching injuries took the wind out of their sails
Ronk325
The Angels rotation isn’t much better than the A’s. Plus the A’s have a better bullpen, lineup, and manager. The Yankees and Red Sox winning a combined 208 games last year didn’t stop the Rays from winning 90 and now they have a legit rotation and will have several top prospects debut this year. Simply put the minor moves made by the Angels this offseason are not enough to put them past either of those teams
macstruts
I wish we could bet, but remember you wrote that and ill do the same.
angelsinthetroutfield
We have no idea how the season will play out, let’s not pretend that we do. It’s likely the Angels/A’s/Rays/Twins/WhiteSox will be fighting for that 2nd WC spot as nobody has truly separated themselves from the pack during the off-season. This is a step in the right direction for the Halos
macstruts
I pay more attention to run differential. But yes, 500 team.
macstruts
The starting staff between the Angels and A’s is not comparable. The A’s don’t miss bats and there number one and two are gone. I’m not sure I’d trade Harris for any of them, and he’s number five on the Angels.
macstruts
I don’t think the A’s are very good and the White Sox are at least a year away. But there is always a surprise team. There are several teams playing for the fifth wild card. I’ll take the field, then I’ll take the Angels.
arc89
Paying $9 million for a reliever coming off a bad year doesn’t make the team a playoff contender. Its a gamble contract that he might regain his pitching style but at $9 million its a very expensive gamble.
canocorn
“ bet the Angels have a better Record. “
Yeah. It’s called Magical Mystery Team.
terry g
Do you have a crystal ball? There no mention of terms other than it’s for one year. You’re assuming it a lot of money. Let’s see what the deal is first.
jbigz12
I’ll make a bet that if the angels are out of it they get a better haul for Allen than they do Cahill. Likely Harvey too for that matter. There’s worse ways to spend 9 million bucks. This is one of the highest upside ways to do so
mike thomas
I think Eppler is playing a great offseason. Hes smart.
thecalhounkid
He definitely has a master plan. I trust that he knows what he is doing
mike thomas
Eddie, Eppler and the Halos do not agree with you obviously. He will be given a chance and the benefit of the doubt to close.
Also, I think the Halos have a good chance to be 5 games behind the stros in the end.
I bet they are wildcard bound.
Don’t be such a downer
bencole
I like the sign. But I’d be very surprised if the Angels were within 10 games of a wild card
macstruts
Really you’d be surprised? Wow.
canocorn
Halo yes.
jbigz12
10 games of a WC? Seattle has regressed. Mariners fans might jump on me for saying that but for 2019 you certainly have regressed. Seattle won so many tight games last year to begin with and losing colome/diaz is going to kill that before you consider the other losses. The A’s have a bunch of nobodies again in their rotation and if their bullpen isn’t excellent again who knows about them either. Other than that it’s the Rays, Twins or some other sleeper bad team (from last year which I don’t see at all) making a jump. I’d probably peg the A’s or Rays as the 2nd WC favorite but wouldn’t be surprised if Trout and co.snuck in. It wouldn’t be any less surprising than the A’s last year for sure
Le Grande Orangerie
Mike I don’t want to be a downer for Angels fans. But they only won 80 games last year, which put them nowhere near the playoffs. They finished 17 games behind the A’s and 10 behind the Rays. Sure the Rays play in the East, but they did last year too and won 90 games. My wife’s rule to me on $ is ‘just because you can, doesn’t mean you should’. So if Allen makes none of his bonus targets, he costs $8.5 mil and has no trade value. Flyers like that are normally much cheaper and the $ should go to something else.
laausc
Well you are a downer … 5 out of the last 6 years Allen had a sub 3 ERA and averaged about 70 innings per year … Trout missed a month last year and the starting pitching staff was decimated with injuries … Cozart missed half the season … with what the Angels have done in the off season I believe with a little luck they will win 90 games in 2019 …
jbigz12
The angels were trotting out a decimated rotation last year. Starting guys like Felix Pena, nick tropeano and even John lamb. If they can get a full season of starts from Harvey, Skaggs, Heaney, Barria and Cahill they’ll be in much better shape. I think they need to add an infielder and an outfielder. Or really Marwin Gonzalez could fit the bill. Calhoun was horrific for half a season and I’m not banking on fletcher and cozart to both be productive. I think Bour is a sneaky good addition and I like the lucroy add as well. Give me those two moves and another reliever like Justin Wilson and I’ll give them a pretty decent chance. Unlikely they make all 3 happen but even 2/3 would seriously help this team plug up it’s obvious holes.
Philliesfan4life
All the angels have to wish for is to have a healthy rotation and get innings
Mike's Trout
Ken Rosenthal is usually spot on so this has some potential to be true.
Mike's Trout
bingo, done deal.
CalcetinesBlancos
One year? My Sox should have been all over this.
HalosHeavenJJ
Good but low candidate. On top of results, the Angels have a lot of young bullpen arms who could use the guidance of a veteran.
jbigz12
I’m just curious why the halos didn’t think Matt Shoemaker was worth the money? He was relatively cheap and they give a few more million bucks to Cahill who is equally as great of an injury concern. I’m just not sure how that move was justified. I don’t have a problem getting Cahill either I just don’t like the shoemaker move
laausc
to many injuries …
cookmeister 2
He has nerve damage. Who knows if he can even feel his fingers
Vizionaire
wouldn’t the jays have him go through a medical checkup? never heard anything from them.
GeoKaplan
That’s not really the issue. With the Angels, he would have gone to arbitration, and the Angels would have had to trash-talk his 2018 season to win a lower salary than Shoemaker would get otherwise. Lots of GMs hate this part of the salary process, because the have to say awful things about the player’s season to win their case with the arbitrator.
But if they sign a deal outside arbitration, the team would have had to pay him around $6M. The Jays, on the other hand, are guaranteeing Shoemaker only $3.5M, which is something the Angels could have done only through winning a nasty arbitration case. And it figures Shoe won’t be pitching any more than 120-140 IP in 2019, due to caution with his arm.
So this worked out well for both Shoemaker and the Angels.
jbigz12
I don’t think major league ball clubs are afraid of “nasty” arbitration cases. They could’ve agreed upon a 3.5 MM salary outside of arb if they desired to skip the process.
canocorn
“Who knows if he can even feel his fingers”
So long as his girl can.
HalosHeavenJJ
Cahill three more innings last year than Shoemaker did the previous 2 or 3 combined.
Even if Shoemaker is back to health (and the drs think they fixed him) he’ll be limited in innings.
Vizionaire
agree. but if shoe is completely healthy he is better pitcher than cahill.
HalosHeavenJJ
I’m a big fan of Shoemaker. I’m just taking a stab at the reason behind the move.
jbigz12
I mean hey, yeah shoe has had his list of problems. But Cahill hasn’t thrown even 115 innings since way back in 2013. You’re giving that guy nearly 10 million bucks. It’s just hard to justify not giving shoe less than half that unless they truly believe Shoe’s health risks are far far worse.
Zachg547
Wow the angels are really going for it all this year!!! Lol
Ejemp2006
We might have October Trout? We like, a lot! But still need probably bring in more, do more? Yes, we think so.
Now eat the Greinke’s contract and trade Tigers for bullpen Greene for setups.
HaloShane
This team needs pitching to make it to October. Nothing remotely close to an Ace on this staff.
GeoKaplan
“Ace” is a 2000 concept in 2019. There are very few pitchers these days who can dominate the other team for 7-9 innings per game (Scherzer, deGrom, Verlander, Snell, very few others).
Analytics and bullpen usage have changed the game to the point that the starter need only keep his team in the game for 5-6 IP and let the pen take over. More frequently, managers don’t want the starter to go through the lineup a third time.
So an ace isn’t what the team needs; it needs a relay team of role pitchers in the bullpen, and starters who can reliably go 5-6 in every start. That’s MLB in 2019, and that is where Eppler is pointing the team.
Basebal101
No idea where you get the concept of no ace needed and saying that’s an old baseball term. I could write 3 paragraphs on how foolish that statement and everything you wrote it is, but it would obviously be a total waste of time with someone who doesn’t understand that side of the game.
canocorn
“Nothing remotely close to an Ace on this staff.”
Or even a King.
Halos2021WSChamps
This could be Street 2.0… This may get ugly…
macstruts
If Street didn’t blow out leg, the Angels would have made the playoffs his first full season with the team.
jleve618
Can you really go wrong for 1 year 9 mil? I mean, I don’t think it pusbes the Angels over the top obviously, but for that I’d have thought a contender would have gotten him.
macstruts
One year contracts never hurt you. Good move by the Angels.
ryanw-2
3 terrible outings ballooned Allen’s ERA. He actually had 52 scoreless outings out of 70. Another example of how deceiving a reliever’s stat line can be sometimes. Good move Angels!
YourDaddy
What is not deceiving is his drop in velocity and his percentage of hard hit balls.
costanza
And the walks, 4.4 BB/9 is not what you want to see from your closer.
KDDtwins
Twins are you out there? Hellooooo??
martras
The Twins were concerned with the length of a 1 year contract so they offered Allen a 2 month contract good through April and May with a club option for the remainder of the season. The Twins cited major long term full year contracts they gave out to Cron and Schoop as reasons another 1 year contract represented too much risk to the organization.
Vizionaire
hey, angels fans have been saying the same thing.
martras
The Twins have the worst record in baseball from the beginning of 2011, have no money on the books beyond next year, and have obvious and glaring needs which have existed for years or even decades.
That doesn’t go hand in hand with the fact the Twins simply don’t spend money. They’ve been outspent in recent years by budget juggernauts like the Rockies, Orioles and Royals.
Twins fans have a reason to be angry.
Samuel
Here is something to think about…….
Falvy with the Twins and Callahan with the Mets know Allen well from their time with the Indians. They still have ties to people with the Indians. None of the Indians, Mets, or Twins – all of whom had bad bullpens going into the off-season – made much of an effort to sign Allen. They know something.
My guess is that they were interested in him as a 6th-7th inning set-up guy at the going rate. This happens to closers all the time – something goes wrong, they get knocked down a few pegs, but can still bounce around as a set-up guy for another 5-8 years at less money. Lots of Jim Johnson’s and Hector Rondon’s out there.
Allen wants another shot at closing, the Angels had an opening.
martras
It’s not so much I’m particularly upset about Allen. It’s about the Twins being a totally aimless franchise. There is no franchise in baseball more risk averse or less understanding of how money is made in MLB.
Samuel
@ martras
They’ve been in a rebuild since Falvy and Levine came in. They just didn’t tell the fans. The first step was to get the big contracts off the books. That’s about done. All the signings of veterans they’ve done have been for a year or two – placeholders. They’re buying time to develop youngsters, especially pitchers.
Jjbeach
Oh, the Twins KNOW how money is MADE.
They need training on how it is SPENT.
martras
They were in rebuild long before that. The rebuild started in 2012.
martras
The Royals are a perfect example. When the Royals started winning, revenue increased and they spent the money to keep the winning going. The Royals are a true small market team and they surpassed the Twins in spending by quite a bit in recent years.
The Twins tighten their purse strings more and more every year because they had less revenue in the previous year, fielding a bad product while fewer and fewer people have interest. It’s a death spiral.
I truly believe the Twins are the only team in MLB whose ownership has a goal of being “competitive” where 81-81 is considered successful. If the team gets lucky and makes the playoffs, well that’s the cherry on top to the Pohlads.
Samuel
“They were in rebuild long before that. The rebuild started in 2012.”
@ martras;
No.
That rebuild failed.
Small and mid market franchises have only a 2 or 3 year window to win. By the time Falvy-Levine get a batch of youngsters up and productive, players such as Sano and Roserio will be eligible for free agency. The Twins can sign some for high salaries, but others will elect to leave.,
canocorn
“Twins are you out there? Hellooooo??”
Too busy shoveling out.
LosAngelesAngelesAngelesAngels
Finally a closer!
YourDaddy
This is a good signing. If it wasn’t for the nearly 1 mph drop in velocity, I would think he would be a great bounceback candidate. Instead I think he will improve marginally and that is still a valuable thing for the Angels.
Vizionaire
$9 mil for a pitcher going downhill? hope epp adds a lefty stopper.
martras
Top closers have been earning north of $10M annually on 3+ year contracts since 2005. $9M on a 1 year contract is a good deal.
Vizionaire
if he doesn’t get back the speed of pitches he may not even be a closer. anyway , we need a lefty specialist/stopper.
macstruts
From last year to this year, How much velocity has he lost?
Omarj
I’m okay. Maybe overpaid by 1 mil based on last season. Market is slim. Gotta make a move
Adam6710
Wow, an offseason full of reclamation projects and “comeback” candidates. Nice job, Angels.
JJB
Unless they offer the most money, it’s difficult to get anybody to want to play in Minnesota anymore. There’s the risk of postponed games in April (like last season) due to snowstorms in the “spring”, and the stadium is in a very unsafe area now with the rise in homelessness, protesting, and rise in violent crime downtown.
Phoenixdownyjr
Nice try lol. The area around target field is awfully gentrified my dude. And the camp on minnehaha is not even in the stadium area….
Melchez
Angels need more moves like this… fix the pen. Their rotation isn’t very good, so they need to shorten the game with a strong bullpen. Like the Royals did when they won the World Series.
Their pen could use a couple lefties… maybe Justin Wilson and Dan Jennings?
Their offense and defense is very good. They could use Moustakas as a lefty bat at third, but other than that, they are fine.
stubby66
I gotta agree with bringing in some of those guys maybe even a Broxberger and a Duke. Then you get a couple of win streaks and breaks this could be a team that can very well do something in the playoffs.
Pablo
Depressing as a twins fan. It was a maybe target. I guess they are content to give up at least a run or two for every inning a reliever pitches. 50 win seasons with 40 wins given up by relievers is pretty crappy to me. Our rotation is weak enough, Knowing if they go 8 innings with a one run lead isn’t enough for a win is just sad.
It will be the worst pen in baseball and the management will somehow pretend like it’s stunning that it happened. “We did’t invest at all in the team, and it got worse?!” It must be the coaches and discount players,
megaj
Rod Beck racked up 51 saves one year with a WHIP of over 1.3 so maybe this will work for the Halos.
its_happening
Brad Brach just got a raise.
Angels think they can win this year. They needed bullpen help and got a bounce-back candidate. The Angels got what they needed to address.
Boogaloo
The Angel’s are becoming a joke. Signing a bunch of lottery tickets.
Even if they do well, they’ll be gone next year.
Trout must be counting the days.
macstruts
Isn’t that what the A’s did last year. The Angels were a 500 team last year in spite of there injuries, and there were plenty. I don’t see how adding several players who may add 1 win is bad baseball. Not to mention, Mike Trout missed a few weeks. I think what is more clear is you don’t know baseball.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
I would think agents should avoid using Mark Melancon as a comp.
Melancon’s deal serves as a reminder why big money deals for the game’s most volatile position are a bad idea.
jim stem
Maybe he’s just the bridge to Middleton coming back to full strength. Plus, pretty good guy for Key and Anderson to talk to about the mental aspect of closing. Solid move and just a one year filler for the Angels given the current make up in their ‘pen.
GeoKaplan
That’s right. There isn’t an option for 2020 on this deal.
Eppler is apparently going to allow Buttrey, Anderson and Middleton (as he returns) to audition during 2019 for closer next year.
@%!&!
Poor Trout! TRADE TROUT!!! He REALLY wants to play in Philly now. He’s not going to stick around.
Rich Hill’s Elbow
F**king bulls**t!!! Where are the Twins???
Julio Franco's Birth Certificate
It makes no sense what the Twins are (not) doing. My team is Cleveland and they are totally beatable in the Central this year, but it seems like both the Twins and White Sox have no desire to try to even get better.
KC and Detroit are glorified AA and AAA teams, so it looks like Cleveland in the AL Central again.
shelteredsoxfan
Lmao have you been under a rock all offseason? I’d say the White Sox are trying too hard to get better. If anything the moves the Sox have made so far this winter, are too far ahead of schedule for them
jbigz12
If you’re an indians fan you’re completely unaware of the rest of your division. The chieox have added multiple pieces and are heavily in on Machado and Harper. They’re making every effort to compete. The twins made a bunch of moves themselves but they could stand to add a lot more in the pen if they plan on making a real run.
El Kabong
jbigz12, Absolutely. The moves made by the Chisox and especially the Twins make it more difficult for Cleveland to trade Kluber or Bauer. They can still do it, but would perhaps kiss the playoffs goodbye by doing so. Not the best message to send to a fan base that is already lukewarm in its support of the team. Should the Chisox sign Harper or Machado, it is up to the Indians to either compete or face fan mutiny.
jbigz12
Idk if they traded Kluber or Bauer that they still wouldn’t be the best team in the division but the twins and white Sox are attempting to compete. That rotation even without a Bauer or Kluber is miles better than anyone else in that division and you still have Lindor and Ramirez. There is a reason this team was miles better than the rest last season.
Piro
Another reclamation project. I’m starting to feel bad for Trout, he’s the best player in the game, and has such a lousy team.
Ohtani-san
“What’s with all these one year deals?! Trout is gonna leave if you don’t sign top free agents!” Yeah dude, how do you reckon they’re gonna be able to even PAY Trout what it’s gonna take to resign him if you don’t clear the additional payroll space for his pay raise?? All you creepin Philly fans need to fck off for 2 years, with your clown comments
macstruts
Bring in Tony Sipp and Mike Moustakas. Move Cozart to second.
I know people love Fletcher, but if you look at batted ball speed, he’s over-matched. Out of 332 ranked players, he ranks 331. Dee Gordon is 332.
Wahoo What a Finish!
To those that have tickets in seats beyond the home run fence in Angels Stadium: INCOMING!!!! Bring your glove to the ballpark as Allen gives up tater after tater.
macstruts
Another person who doesn’t know baseball. Unless you tuck it down the line, it’s really hard for right handed hitters to get a HR souvenir from RH hitters in Anaheim.
Nice hyperbole. I don’t understand why there are so many Angel haters, but we seem to have more than our fair share of haters. .
Vizionaire
simple answer? trout.
macstruts
I think you are right. I didn’t hate the Ms because they had Griffey. I didn’t hate the Res for having Bench, Morgan and Rose. In my youth, I didn’t hate the Braves for having Aaron or the Giants for having Mays.
I guess other fans believe they are entitled to other teams players.
dirkg
You’re spot on Vision. Trout is like Kobe and Lebron, he brings out the haters. Except Trout is a genuine “nice guy” so the Angels receive the hate instead of the player. I’m just glad the Halos are doing everything they can (with the albatross Pujols contract wrapped around their neck) rather than rooting for a team in desperation of the “hope” that Trout 1) leaves the Angel’s and 2) chooses their team. Go Trout and Go Halos!
macstruts
Pujos contract is horrible, however there is only three years left. It’s even partially offset by the tremendous deal the Angels are getting on Ohtani, Add to that the deal the Angels are getting on Bour, and i expect very good production out of the DH/1B spot. I expect those two positions to produce in 2019 at a non-killer cost.
What’s really hurting is the 11.5 million on Kole Calhoun. The Angels can’t upgrade RF, so they are hoping Calhoun can comeback. That’s a lot of money to shell out to RF and no production. . In 2020, Adell will take over.
If Calhoun produces, it’s a very good lineup.
Julio Franco's Birth Certificate
“Only” three years left on Pujols deal? Oh man, do I feel bad for Angels fans. Tigers fans and the Miggy contract are in the same boat.
macstruts
Again, it’s partially offset for 2019 because of the great deal on Ohtani. How much do you think Ohtani would have been paid as a free agent last year?
Who is off-setting Miggy? And there is five years left on his. 152 million left on Miggy. 87 Million left on Pujols. Not really sure how they are comparable at this point. The Tigers would trade contacts in a heart beat.
dirkg
Anyway you slice it, Pujols and Miggy are perfect examples why we’re seeing so many short term deals…and why Harper, Manny, and Kimbrel remained unsigned. Higher AAV, shorter term contracts are here to stay (at least until they change the arbitration rule).
macstruts
I completely agree.
I don’t think players are going to get big contracts unless their history is pristine and they play a key defensive positions.
.
Wahoo What a Finish!
Not an Angel hater at all. Just think Allen is completely overrated
macstruts
Overrated by whom?
He’s 30 years old. Setup men in their 30s are signing three year deals of 30+ million dollars. Allen signed a one year deal with an guaranteed 8.5 million. From 2012 to 2015 he had an ERA of 2.59. How do you overrate that? In the post season those years, he gave up 1 run in 21+ innings. How do you overrate that.
As far as closers, fans think they should never blow a save. Even Angel fans thought Percival and K-Rod were overrated.
Syndergaarden Cop
Cites 2012 to 2015 stats, asks “how do you overrate that?” Moron
Yankeepatriot
Allen’s huge walk rate increase along with his 0.3 increase in his HR/9 compared to 2017 led to Allen’s doom last season. Great bounce back option though and as always you can’t ever go wrong on a one year deal. Kimbrel is salty right now. The twins should have gotten him imo
macstruts
You’re right. It’s hard for me to dismiss a 30 year old based on a season of 67 innings.
One year contracts never hurt you.
canocorn
Never?
Ask Cardinals fans how their 1-yr with Greg Holland worked out.
macstruts
I think you made my point. There were no long term ramifications.
He was given 14 million on one year deal a day before the season started.
He shouldn’t even have affected payroll decisions.
It cost them 14 million bucks. It didn’t prevent them from signing anyone in the off-season. It didn’t affect them one bit in 2019.
You take a gamble, it only cost money, if you are wrong, you cut him. Which they did. He should have never been used in high leverage situations anyway.
If the Angels are wrong on Allen, they cut him. No matter how bad he is, it’s a contract that really doesn’t hurt you.
JFactor
I wish the Cards had done this exact deal with him.
I still feel like they need to add another reliever who could steal the closers role, and take that gamble on a one year deal.
timewalk42
Love it ….a one year make good contract keeping future money of the books to see what they can do with Trout
Vizionaire
sign a lh specialist!
Trevor44
Poor guy actually has to rely on the angels to win this year
Syndergaarden Cop
Trout must be so thrilled
BettingResource.Com
Bad news for those who hoped Buttrey would get the closer gig!