MLBTR is publishing Offseason Outlooks for all 30 teams. Click here to read the other entries in this series.
The 2018 season was a resounding success for the Athletics, who entered the campaign as underdogs but ended it as one of the majors’ premier teams. Despite opening the season with baseball’s lowest payroll, the Athletics notched the sport’s fourth-most wins (97) and earned their first playoff berth since 2014. The postseason was a one-off for the Athletics, whom the Yankees bounced in the American League wild-card game, but it’s obvious the franchise came a long way this past year. Now, with the A’s looking to build an even better club for 2019, they’re set to increase payroll, as just-extended executive vice president Billy Beane announced this week. Of course, with the A’s still at least a few years away from potentially opening a new ballpark in Oakland, it may be unrealistic to expect their payroll to make a substantial near-term jump.
Guaranteed Contracts
- Stephen Piscotty, OF: $29.5MM through 2022 (includes buyout of 2023 club option)
- Yusmeiro Petit, RP: $6.5MM through 2019 (includes buyout of 2020 club option)
Arbitration-Eligible Players (projections via MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz)
- Khris Davis – $18.1MM
- Mike Fiers – $9.7MM
- Marcus Semien – $6.6MM
- Blake Treinen – $5.8MM
- Sean Manaea – $3.8MM
- Kendall Graveman – $2.5MM
- Cory Gearrin – $2.4MM
- Liam Hendriks – $2.1MM
- Mark Canha – $2.1MM
- Chris Bassitt – $1.6MM
- Ryan Buchter – $1.3MM
- Josh Phegley – $1.2MM
- Ryan Dull – $900K
- Non-tender candidates: Graveman, Gearrin, Hendriks, Phegley, Dull
Contract Options
- Fernando Rodney, RP: Exercised $5.25MM club option for 2019
Free Agents
- Jonathan Lucroy, Jed Lowrie, Matt Joyce, Trevor Cahill, Jeurys Familia, Shawn Kelley, Brett Anderson, Edwin Jackson
[Athletics Offseason Depth Chart | Athletics Payroll Information]
Here’s a statement which would have seemed believable in, say, 2010 instead of 2018: A team which saw Trevor Cahill, Brett Anderson and Edwin Jackson total at least 17 starts apiece made the playoffs. Amazingly, Oakland accomplished that this past season after grabbing Cahill, Anderson and Jackson off the scrapheap. All three of those pitchers’ halcyon days were supposedly long gone, but each paid dividends for an A’s team whose starting staff dealt with a horrific rash of injuries, including to No. 1 option Sean Manaea and promising youngsters A.J. Puk and Jharel Cotton, among many others. Manaea easily led the A’s in innings (160 2/3) and ERA (3.59), but his season ended Aug. 24 because of a shoulder injury/surgery that could keep him out for all of 2019. Meanwhile, both Puk and Cotton missed the entire season after undergoing Tommy John surgery, and they’re also likely to sit out some portion of next year.
Because of the injuries to Manaea, Puk and Cotton, not to mention the fact that Cahill, Anderson and Jackson are now free agents, questions abound in the A’s rotation. Unsurprisingly, it’s a major area of concern for Beane, who said this week that he and general manager David Forst – who, along with manager Bob Melvin, also just received an extension – want to “create a starting pitching group that Bob can rely on every day.”
Piecing together a reliable starting group was an extremely difficult task for the A’s in 2018, which led them to deploy the “opener” on several occasions, including in their playoff loss to the Yankees. Veteran reliever Liam Hendriks was the main pick in such situations, totaling eight “starts” in September. With the exception of a subpar playoff showing, Hendriks pitched brilliantly in those short outings, thereby salvaging his season just a couple months after the A’s cut him from their 40-man roster. The 29-year-old is now among the A’s arbitration-eligible players, and it’s unclear whether they’ll retain him or how they’ll utilize Hendriks if they keep him. Whether it’s Hendriks or another pitcher(s), Oakland could take a page out of the 2018 Rays’ playbook and use an opener on a regular basis for the majority of the season, which would slightly lessen the need to acquire traditional starting pitchers over the winter.
Of course, even if the A’s do continue rolling with that unorthodox strategy next season, they’d still need more help. After all, the unspectacular Mike Fiers – acquired from Detroit in August – looks like the most proven healthy starter they have. The 33-year-old did good work during his two-month stint in Oakland in 2018, but he’s more of a mid- to back-end arm than a front-line type. Fiers also won’t be cheap in 2019, but given the uncertainty throughout the A’s rotation, he seems more likely than not to stick with the club.
Beyond Fiers, Oakland’s top healthy options look to be Daniel Mengden, Frankie Montas and Chris Bassitt. All three were reasonably effective last season, but each carry limited track records in the majors. Lefty Jesus Luzardo has never appeared in the bigs, on the other hand, but the 21-year-old is one of Oakland’s best hopes to find an ace from within. While Luzardo has only combined for 94 2/3 innings above the Single-A level, he’s regarded as a stud prospect, and Forst recently suggested he could vie for a starting spot with the A’s as soon as spring training.
No matter what happens with Luzardo in camp, it’s clear the A’s will have to augment their rotation from the outside prior to then. The question is whether they have the financial flexibility to make headline-grabbing moves. Including arbitration projections, the A’s are already looking at an Opening Day payroll of more than $86MM, Jason Martinez of MLBTR and Roster Resource estimates. They began last season just under $66MM, and they’ve only gone past $86MM once (in 2016). The A’s could create spending room by non-tendering some players and perhaps extending expensive designated hitter Khris Davis in order to lower his 2019 salary. However, even if those scenarios come to fruition, it’s tough to envision them being in position to splurge on anyone.
The good news is that Beane and Forst proved they could bargain hunt on the starting pitching market recently with the additions of Cahill, Anderson and Jackson (plus Rich Hill in 2016). And looking at this year’s class of free-agent starters, there’s no shortage of available veterans who a.) have been successful and b.) won’t break the bank. A few of the many names include CC Sabathia (a Bay Area native), Lance Lynn, Derek Holland (Bay Area ties from spending 2018 with the Giants), Ervin Santana, Clay Buchholz and former Athletics Gio Gonzalez, Drew Pomeranz and Tyson Ross. On paper, nobody from that group is all that exciting, but they could be effective, affordable options for Oakland to pursue in free agency. Alternatively, the A’s may seek higher-upside types via trade.
Even though he bombed as a member of the Yankees, who acquired him from the Athletics in July 2017, a reunion with Sonny Gray could make sense. The Yankees are all but guaranteed to sell low on the soon-to-be 29-year-old Gray, who pitched well outside of New York in 2018 and who’s projected to earn $9.1MM next season. If the A’s want to go bigger than Gray, perhaps they’ll make a push for a member of the Indians’ stellar trio of Corey Kluber, Carlos Carrasco and Trevor Bauer. Cleveland will reportedly listen to offers for each of those hurlers, but because all three are fantastic and relatively inexpensive, the Tribe would demand bounties for any of them. With that in mind, it’s worth noting the A’s farm system sits a middle-of-the-pack 15th in Baseball America’s latest rankings. They probably wouldn’t be in the catbird seat with regard to acquiring any of the Indians’ aces, then.
There are fewer pressing issues elsewhere on the A’s roster, but they aren’t devoid of concerns. While most of the A’s terrific, Blake Treinen-led bullpen remains intact, they could lose two important pieces from it in Jeurys Familia and Shawn Kelley, who are now free agents. Meantime, on the position player side, their biggest questions are at catcher and second base, where their 2018 starters are also free agents.
At the keystone, Jed Lowrie has been an extension target for the A’s since at least the summer. Oakland wasn’t able to lock the 34-year-old up before the market opened, but it still seems to want him back. Considering Lowrie was among the majors’ most valuable second basemen from 2017-18, that’s not surprising. But the A’s will have to consider his age and injury history, not to mention the presence of intriguing youngster Franklin Barreto, when determining how much they’re willing to pay Lowrie. In the event Lowrie walks, Oakland could simply turn second over to the soon-to-be 23-year-old Barreto – who, despite posting palatable production in the majors and minors, struck out and walked at untenable rates from 2017-18 – or add one of the many veteran stopgaps available in free agency as a fallback.
The A’s took the veteran stopgap route behind the plate an offseason ago, signing Jonathan Lucroy to a one-year, $6.5MM deal. Lucroy’s a free agent again as a result, and it’s possible the A’s will bring him back on another short-term agreement. Lucroy, 32, is nowhere near the player he used to be, though he seemed to fit in nicely with the Athletics in 2018. Aside from Yasmani Grandal and Wilson Ramos, each of whom should be out of the A’s price range, free agency’s lacking in game-changing backstops. That could lead the A’s to at least kick the tires on baseball’s best catcher from 2018, J.T. Realmuto, whom the Marlins figure to trade this winter. However, as is the case with the aforementioned Indians starters, acquiring Realmuto would mean surrendering a haul. As such, the A’s may be more inclined to go with a Lucroy type and continue waiting for 24-year-old catching prospect Sean Murphy, who could arrive in the majors sometime next season.
While catcher and second base are clearly the A’s biggest problem areas among their position players, there’s an argument that they should also add to their outfield. However, they’re already crowded out there, and most of the returnees acquitted themselves well in 2018.
The A’s most established outfielder is right fielder Stephen Piscotty, one of their shrewdest acquisitions from last winter. Center fielder Ramon Laureano was also an impact pickup from an offseason ago, but his addition came with much less fanfare than Piscotty’s. Laureano joined the A’s via waivers from the division-rival Astros in November, and he surprisingly went on to emerge as a standout during a 176-plate appearance campaign. Along with playing tremendous defense, the righty-swinger held his own against same-handed pitchers and lefties alike, creating hope that he can be an everyday starter for the long haul. The unheralded trio of Mark Canha, Chad Pinder and Nick Martini also proved to be tough outs, and the A’s may be confident they’ll deftly hold down left field in 2019. There’s also Dustin Fowler, whom the A’s acquired in the Gray deal. Fowler, 23, had a difficult rookie year, though in fairness, it was his first action since he suffered a brutal knee injury while with the Yankees in 2017.
Evidenced in part by their outfield, there should once again be plenty to like about the A’s cast of position players in 2019. Superstar third baseman Matt Chapman – whom the A’s may try to extend – will continue to be their franchise player, while Davis, first baseman Matt Olson, shortstop Marcus Semien and at least a couple outfielders represent quality complements who remain on hand. The bullpen also continues to look formidable, leaving the A’s shaky starting rotation as their most significant issue this offseason. Between the unit’s injuries, its potential free-agent departures and the A’s payroll constraints, Beane and Forst have serious work ahead to turn the staff into a strength prior to next season. If they’re able to achieve that feat, it would go a long way toward helping the A’s stay among baseball’s elite in 2019.
5TUNT1N
Well written I agree with most of what’s in here as a Bay Area baseball fan, exciting times ahead sticking to there guns with the front office/manager this teams gonna be tons of fun to watch on the field in 19 but watching what Forst/Beane do with the rotation in the off-season is almost as exciting!
Samuel
The A’s outlook? Seriously?
That roster will turn over more then any teams in 2019, with the possible exception of a team that decides to do a rebuild in mid-season and dumps salary.
The A’s lead the majors in turning MLB into fantasy league baseball.
On the last day of the 2019 season I expect the A’s roster to have at least 60% different players on it then it does today. Has anyone done research on yearly roster turnover? By team? By front office administration?
davidcoonce74
They won 97 games last season; they’re doing something right. That’s more wins than the Cubs or Nats or Giants or…well….every team with less than 97 wins. Oakland had the lowest payroll in baseball. They play in a terrible ballpark – the last multi-purpose stadium in MLB, and multi-purpose stadiums are awful. Oakland is also right in the backyard of one of the richest and most successful teams in baseball, with a beautiful modern ballpark. Oakland doesn’t have the lucrative local TV deals that most teams are getting rich from; Oakland is a poorer community and that, coupled with the terrible stadium situation, hurts them to the point where they have to mix and match.
And yet, they won 97 games last year. In a tough division, one featuring Houston and also featuring the best player on the planet. Teams like SD or Florida could learn a lot from Oakland; hell, Baltimore, which has a vastly higher budget than the A’s, won half as many games. This is the reality of baseball in a small market, a bad stadium, no great TV revenue and in the close proximity to a juggernaut. But they’ve made it work.
Samuel
Thanks for straightening me out.
Billy Beane teams have won one playoff series in 20 years.
The man that hired and schooled him on the use of statistics in baseball – Sandy Alderson – built an A’s team that went to the WS.
A few years ago the low payroll Indians went to the WS.
For 2 years before that the low payroll Royals went to the WS, winning one.
There are other examples of low payroll teams winning more then one playoff series the past 20 years.
AsNchill
PlAyOfFs DeCiDe EvErYtHiNg
dinsdale
Skydome is also a multi-purpose stadium (and it shows).
justin-turner overdrive
If you even bothered to take off your hater goggles for even like 3 seconds, and tell me with a straight face how to prevent Jeter from not walking over in front of the catcher to catch and shovel pass an errant throw home, I’m all ears. Beane’s 364 days of work is negated by singular plays in the postseason in your mind, huh? Yeah that’s not what reality is, the reality is the A’s have been absurdly unlucky in the postseason in Beane’s era, and that’s the only thing that needs to be said.
Dumb narrative and even dumber post. You think you’d understand baseball like 1% before coming in these threads. Hit the books, son.
davidcoonce74
One game is not a playoff “Series.” The one-game wild-card playoff is bad baseball, period.
justin-turner overdrive
If you even bothered to take off your hater goggles for even like 3 seconds, and tell me with a straight face how to prevent Jeter from not walking over in front of the catcher to catch and shovel pass an errant throw home, I’m all ears.
Dumb narrative and even dumber post. You think you’d understand baseball like 1% before coming in these threads. Hit the books, son.
snotrocket
It would be pretty cool if the A’s decided to go for it and actually signed some upper tier starting pitching.
hammertime510
Would love to see Yusei Kikuchi get signed long term here and if possible another arm in the bullpen ( Miller). Add in the possibility of adding Realmuto to this squad and we’re talking a possible WS run.
AsNchill
We probably won’t go after Realmuto, I’m sure Miller still has name value that will make him more expensive than we want to spend on a reliever and I don’t know about Kikuchi.
Kikuchi could be for this 2019 club what Cespedes was for that 2012 club, and we be start of the Southpawcolypse in Oakland.
hammertime510
Kikuchi is definitely a Cespedes type move, he’ll surprise a lot of people. And If not Miller, another decent reliever ( Familia, Britton, Allen) would make sense since I believe the A’s need insurance just in case Trienen and Trivino aren’t as dominant. Realmuto would be the real get!
AsNchill
Yeah, I just don’t see us giving the Marlins what they want for Realmuto. You gotta know they’d be asking us for Murphy, and I don’t believe Murphy is worth just 2 years or whatever of Realmuto. Murphy is already a major league ready catcher defensively, and his bat isn’t too far behind him right now.
And if fangraphs is right on their projections that Kikuchi will get somewhere around 4/40 we could definitely be in on that, even if the shoulder injury concerns are there.
justin-turner overdrive
I agree, it would be amazing to see them grab Keuchel then trade with Clev for Kulber, Carrasco or Bauer. They’d be a juggernaut in seconds.
mmarinersfan
The greatest day of my life will be the one where Kevin Mather and John Stanton aren’t running this team. A reluctance to increase payroll, and because of that, the mariners are taking a step back this offseason to gear up for post 2019 times, so next year, we’ll be behind Oakland again. (Also, issues for Mather go much farther than payroll, and baseball related issues.)
Unless we pull some magic, and the whole offseason plan of taking a step back isn’t true, but if it is, we’re definitely behind Oakland by a lot.
This Oakland team is special, but they were completely lucky to get out of their rotation what they did, there is no other way to put it. But their bullpen is as nasty as I’ve seen, so it makes up for it
Vizionaire
will be behind the angels, too!
mmarinersfan
This was also said before the 2018 season started and injuries happened again. So, I wouldn’t count on that.
#Fantasygeekland
It’s not that bad… there are still some teams who have never given out an $100M contract- Seattle has Cano. They spent the 10th most in the MLB at $160M, so I can’t really see why payroll is the issue.
mmarinersfan
Right now payroll is an issue, since there’s money tied to players like Dee Gordon, Felix, and Kyle Seager (less on him because I expect a much better year from him next season) who were absolutely awful in 2018. And with the farm system the Mariners have now, and not a lot of depth, then free agency is going to be a big way to fill holes in the roster. Jerry makes trades work every year though, so I won’t go too far there. At least they have guys who will impact at the earliest mid 2019 (Braden Bishop, Evan White, Kyle Lewis)
justin-turner overdrive
Dipoto is absolutely terrible at GMing and Seattle and any other team he runs will always be irrelevant in October. Jeez, people think Beane is overrated, Dipoto has ONE postseason appearance in NINE years!!! And the Angels got swept out in that one appearance!
All trades no substance no plan. Trader Jerry sucks at his job.
bigkempin
Payroll has gone up every season for the past 6. Felix/Seager/Segura were extended, Cano/Cruz/Leake were signed, traded for Dee, and made an attempt to sign Ohtani. They’re a mid market team with bad attendance and just finished with a franchise record $157M payroll….but they aren’t trying enough or spending enough money. Some fans just think that every team should be able to spend like BOS, LA, or NYY
andrewgauldin
I can see a JT Realmuto and Dan Straily grade to Oakland. Oakland needs a starter and a catcher, Miami needs prospects. What goes back to Miami? I assume Murphy for sure, what else?
justin-turner overdrive
Anyone but Puk or Luzardo, really.
AsNchill
I’d be open to trade guys we haven’t drafted. Martin, White and Barrera look more promising than Mateo, Barreto and Fowler at this point.
Zagarna
The problem with this theory is that you’re, pretty much by definition, selling low on guys you were high on a year or two ago. I wouldn’t normally make that kind of move unless it was to trade them back to their original franchise, which is in a better position to value them appropriately.
The A’s traded for those guys for a reason. Patience is a virtue, especially when there’s no rush to clear 40-man space.
AsNchill
Could be they traded for them so they wouldn’t have to rush the development of guys lower down in the system. I believe that, in the case of Jorge Mateo. Maybe they have to sign a guy, or force one of White and Martin to Triple A too quickly.
It also wouldn’t be selling low necessarily. I provided a write up below, and I wanted these guys to only be included in trades for middle/top rotation guys, not just traded because.
LADreamin
What the the Dodgers get back if they send Alex Wood and Kyle Farmer to Oakland? They would get a SP to plug into the rotation and what could be a starting catcher for them considering their options. I’d imagine LA would want some arms from the back of their bullpen or prospects? Any thoughts?
AsNchill
Not a lot. They’re back end arms.
I Believe We Can Win
1. Trade Khris Davis. Little expensive for a DH.
2. Padres and athletics line up here. Padres have a DH replacement in reyes even renfroe padres would have interest in Barreto Neuse mateo Richie martin. Padres have some pitching they can part with as well. I’m sure there’s a deal to be had.
Maybe athletics get reyes- nix- kennedy-
Padres get Barreto- neuse- mateo- holmes
Friarfaithful117
That’s not a good deal for Oakland.
justin-turner overdrive
Barreto-Neuse-Mateo-Holmes probably gets you Realmuto or Bauer, SD is definitely not a match with Oakland, unless you are an SD fan who wants to post a lopsided trade.
I Believe We Can Win
That won’t get you realmuto or Bauer. Not even close. Puk or luzardo is a must for realmuto followed by Barreto neuse and 1 of Murray or beck.
Barreto and Mateo have lost some of their shine. Mateo has stalled out at aa and aaa past 2 seasons. Barreto hasnt taken hold of his brief stints.
Either way Khris Davis could net a good package if you chip in some money it could be a great package. 18 mill isn’t cheap.
Money saved should go to the rotation- maybe cheap signings like Cahill Sanchez gio gonzalez
AsNchill
We ended the season at $80M, and Beane has already stated that payroll will go up. We could sign Cahill and Gonzalez and not have to trade Khris Davis. They’re still hoping they can extend him to what his market value actually is and not what an arbitrator will decide just by looking at his home run and RBI totals.
justin-turner overdrive
Mateo has only had ONE off season, last year at AAA for the first time, so stop lying. He was great at AA in 2017. Barreto mashed plenty of homers in limited time at age 22 in MLB. Your analysis is all wrong.
AsNchill
I’m going to go out on a limb and say Richie Martin isn’t going anywhere. We’ve been waiting for him to break out with the bat, and now that he has we actually have a solid replacement for Semien in a couple of years.
BlueJayFan1515
I like Pomeranz to Oakland. He seems like a pretty good bounce back candidate.
AsNchill
Just keep chairs away from him this time.
justin-turner overdrive
Yeah he pretty much cost the A’s in 2014 getting hurt down the stretch. Beane hates him forever for that and basically gave him away for nothing to SD.
Erik
A’s have just found a job for Bartolo Colon again
Wilmer the Thrillmer
Am I the only one who is surprised that the A’s picked up Rodney’s option? I’m happy for Rodney because I generally root for the old guys but he did have a 1.6 WHIP in Oakland.
Zagarna
I was quite surprised myself, but the second-biggest weakness of the Beane era (after his penchant for all-in-win-now trades that turn out to be disastrous overpays, e.g. Matt Holliday and Samardzija) has been the team’s willingness to spend what payroll room it has on replacement-level middle relievers.
justin-turner overdrive
He eats innings and is thrives in low impact situations, to which the A’s have plenty of innings to be eaten.
AsNchill
I think it’s hard to gauge what the A’s will do this offseason. 2018 was a surprise, but I think the front office is invested in this particular group and are willing to see how far they can take it. Beane and the front office are also pretty confident they can increase payroll this year from where we ended at $80M at the end of the season after all the additions at the deadline and through waiver pickups.
In an ideal world we re-sign Lowrie, extend Davis and try and move Barreto/Fowler/Mateo for a higher end starter. The upside those 3 guys still have should be a reasonable package, together or individually, to be a starting point for a decent starter, and we have replacements for them in Double A, two of which are going to be R5 eligible this season. Richie Martin finally broke out with the bat as a defense first shortstop, Eli White is continuing to impress in the AFL and so is Barreto.
Definitely going to be an interesting offseason for us.
AsNchill
Luis Barrera, not Barreto. Sorry.
justin-turner overdrive
Why Lowrie when there are cheaper/better options both in FA and internally? The A’s only need a C and SPs, everything else is covered pretty much.
Zagarna
As I said on another thread, I think a partial mulligan on the Gray trade makes a lot of sense for both teams. I imagine the A’s would give Fowler or Mateo back to the Yankees for Gray and some relief on his salary. The Yankees won’t get a full mulligan because Gray only has one year left under contract. Cahill seems like an obvious candidate for a re-signing and as the post mentioned, there are numerous other second- and third-tier SP candidates available.
No additional resources need to be wasted on the pen and I won’t discuss it further..
On the position player side, Davis is neither underpaid nor overpaid; he’s a pretty good (not great) player getting pretty-good-(not-great)-player money. The team should be willing to trade him if someone’s willing to give up significant value, or a short (not Ryan Howard-like) extension could also make sense, but I’d be just fine with paying him this season, issuing a QO next year, and either he takes it or he doesn’t and it’s fine either way. There’s no urgent problem there. The outfield needs to sort itself out and I wouldn’t pay to upgrade it.
Second base is a different story. Barreto and Mateo are unconvincing and while the team doesn’t necessarily have to overpay to retain Lowry, I think they need to make a hire from among the many available candidates at that position. And catcher is just a black hole, not just on the A’s but on the FA market as well. I could see the team making a move to fill it through trade or alternately kicking the tires on someone like Suzuki. But it’s likely to remain a point of weakness.
Overall I think the approach needs to be the same as it was this year– competitive, but not “all in.” There are too many weaknesses; the team isn’t going to project to win 97 games again. Pick up some of the better scrapheap guys, see how things look midseason, and don’t be afraid to wait until 2020 when more of the rotation pieces will be back in action.
hammertime510
Addison Russell for 2nd base?
AsNchill
Lol gross.
justin-turner overdrive
You cannot trade suspended players
afannaz
Please, give us Oakland A’s fans a rest from all talk “new ballpark..” We will believe it’s real when we see first pitch on day 1, OK? Thank you for your consideration!