The Major League Baseball Players Association has voted to extend the contract of executive director Tony Clark, according to Jared Diamond of the Wall Street Journal. His term of office is now due to run through 2022, meaning he’ll stay in charge through the duration of the five-year Basic Agreement he previously negotiated and lead the MLBPA as it prepares to hammer out a new one in 2021.
Clark, a long-time MLB player himself, took the top union post in December of 2013 after the untimely death of Michael Weiner. At the time, the sport was basking in the glow of booming economic growth and longstanding labor peace. The relatively pleasant pie-dividing process has more recently given way to some bickering at the table. Even as the money continues to stream in, teams have increasingly shown a reluctance to commit whopping future sums to relatively old free agents. That, in turn, has many questioning whether the MLBPA needs to craft a new strategic approach.
There are a whole host of interrelated factors at work, of course, including changes to the aging curve, the still-growing power of analytics in all aspects of the game, and perhaps also increasingly business-focused organizational leadership. And it’d be foolish to leap to any final conclusions about the nature of the player market. The best way to ensure revenue for a team, after all, is still to put a compelling product on the field. And the 2018 attendance drop no doubt was felt by some organizations. Competitive pressures still matter.
Still, the collective bargaining situation — in particular, the outcome of the 2016 negotiations — remains a notable factor in the changing labor market dynamics that have been met with no small amount of consternation by the players. As details of the 2016 CBA deal emerged, it became increasingly clear that the Clark-led union approach was one of tweaking the details of the existing system. There were modifications to the qualifying offer, a process that unfairly impacted a few veteran free agents but did not take a major bite out of the players’ overall take. The minimum salary crept up, as did the luxury tax line, and players added gained notable scheduling modifications and other changes to improve their lot.
At the same time, though, the MLBPA gave some notable concessions to the league that may well have dovetailed with other developments to hur the players’ collective bottom line. In particular, significant new penalties for spending over the luxury line held out the promise of constraining top-level payrolls. Meanwhile, a hard cap went in place for international signings, leaving virtually the entire amateur market subject to strict limits.
Those modifications have pressed established big leaguers from both sides, in a manner that was perhaps not easy to foresee in full. Teams are not only disincentivized from adding additional large salaries to finish off a roster, owing to the taxation scheme, but have less reason to do so given their ability to achieve excess value from young talent filtering up through the farm (which is cheaply replaced through the amateur market). An abundance of power arms, for example, has led to the cost-efficient approach of “bullpenning,” while big-market organizations like the Dodgers and Yankees have increasingly found ways to achieve excellent results without dishing out too many monster contracts. Of course, the more truly youthful players are pressed up to the majors, the sooner they’ll reach arbitration and free agency, and the more “prime” years they’ll have to sell.
It will likely take some time for the market changes to settle out and reveal themselves in full. Still, the problems from the players’ side were on display last winter, as numerous veterans found less receptive markets than they had anticipated. Clark went on a PR blitz as the market stagnated and filed a grievance against four teams that accuses them of failing to properly spend their revenue-sharing funds. As a practical matter, though, there wasn’t much that could be done at that point.
For Clark, looking ahead, there are strategic challenges aplenty. The union may need to consider trying more radical changes to its approach, which has traditionally benefited the most-established ballplayers while leaving relative crumbs for young major leaguers and high-end incoming amateurs (and actual crumbs for most minor-leaguers). Gambling money is another potentially game-changing financial boon for teams — and one that the players will not only want a piece of, but could utilize to their advantage from a public relations standpoint.
No doubt there are many possible strategies on the table. With a new lead negotiator to assist him, Clark is surely preparing for the 2021 CBA negotiations and the interim actions that might be taken. As veteran reliever Andrew Miller puts it, “We have confidence in Tony with where we are and where we’re going.”
rivera42
Nice. The players must be happy with the incompetent Clark at the helm.
dimitrios in la
Well he’s a union guy so therefore often blinded by self interest.
iverbure
The players were the one who bargained for personal chefs over other important stuff. The comment section is going to be filled here with ridiculous suggestions like salary floor or salary caps which won’t solve the tanking problem one bit.
dimitrios in la
I don’t think that Clark and his union members understand how ridiculously self-serving they sound. Unions consistently grow out of a real need (God bless Curt Flood!) and they consistently devolve into destructive entities, serving “the worker’s needs” at the expense of so many other factors. UAW would be textbook example. California Teachers Union another.
pjmcnu
Unions seem no longer necessary when they are effective over a long period of time. However, when people lose sight of the fact that things are good for workers BECAUSE of the union’s sustained efforts, and either eliminate them (or they become ineffective), management/ownership slowly starts to push & roll back gains. Soon those who thought unions were unnecessary relics find increased income inequality, failure of labor to share in their companies success, workforce reductions, benefits reduced or eliminated (including pensions), and learn one great lesson: ownership/mgmt appeared not to be like the owners/managers of the late 19th/early 20th century only because they were checked by unions. With unions gone or neutered, the modern owner is perfectly happy to resurrect old habits. In other words, it was effective opposition, not a magical evolution or moral elevation, that brought us kinder, gentler appearing ownership. I think labor in many industries are finding this out now.
iverbure
Players are going to get absolutely pumped in this next CBA with this guy. They cried about the CBA last year while smart players went on shows and said hey guys we not only agreed to the CBA but we actually bargained for some of the very things that are causing the free agent freeze last year.
Like bill James and other great minds have said the players are all replaceable, that’s a inconvenient fact for the players.
stansfield123
They’re not replaceable, though. Obviously. No one would watch the league if the best baseball players in the world weren’t in it.
bobtillman
I’m not sure that that is true. James got misunderstood. His point, a perfectly logical one, is that there would be still be a Cy Young award winner, a batting champion, etc., etc. In any group of 750 players, there would be some that would rise to the top. Fans wouldn’t notice if it was Mookie Betts or Joe Jones.
stansfield123
Oh, so you mean if someone gathered up the thousand best baseball players, killed them and buried them in the woods, then they would be replaceable?
Yes, that is true. But, even in today’s enlightened society, committing mass murder to further your business interests carries a certain stigma.
JKB 2
Bob Tillman you have to be kidding me.
I would notice a Mookie Betts or Joe Jones difference. But hey thats just me. You naturally would not notice
bobtillman
man, you really struggle with some easy stuff, don’t you…..
iverbure
They’re very much replaceable his point was if every player disappeared they’re would be a small downturn of talent for about 2 years and after that business would return to normal. This isn’t for debate, this is fact. If you don’t believe this to be true you can thank the PA for duping you into thinking they aren’t.
stansfield123
Disappeared how?
Cam
Hypothetical, to emphasize the point that the game is bigger than the players.
pjmcnu
You can always tell when someone cannot back up their broad assertion with evidence because they say it’s “not up for debate.”
davidcoonce74
Umm, I know Bill James remembers 1995 Spring Training, I assume you do too; I remember it well – the reason why the owners and players reached a settlement was because we got a real look at how “replaceable” the players are – and nobody liked that look. The baseball was terrible, and if MLB had actually proceeded with playing the season with replacement players they might have destroyed the sport.
Oh and do you remember what MLB was going to pay the replacement players? It was 10,000 dollars for the season, assuming the players made the roster, with a minor league pay scale for work during the season. Basically, the players were going to be paid less than a Wal-Mart cashier to play Major League Baseball. And, of course, if the league had used replacement players many of the minor league teams – which play in union-shop ballparks – couldn’t have had a season at all, and neither of the Canadian teams could have played a game b/c Canada’s union laws don’t allow for replacement workers.
So Bill James is wrong – I admire the man’s work greatly, but he’s quite wrong on this, because evidence shows that, when tried, it was a spectacular failure.
iverbure
I agree James is smarter than everyone here and every single player is replaceable hopefully we see how right he is.
davidcoonce74
Facts are a funny thing – we have factual evidence that the players are not replaceable. But hey, you do you.
Lance
Owners are replaceable, too.
iverbure
Less owners to replace other owners than they’re players to replace players.
Free Clay Zavada
the players are screwed LOL. how clueless are these voters?
Chris Giarraputo
Wow! I’m surprised. No offense to Clark, he always seemed like a very intelligent person hearing him talk as a player but……MLB is changing and teams are spending less and not wanting to sign a player 30 yo+ for more then a few years due to basic analytics now. I think the players association needs a calm and controlled leader but, a bulldog too at the same time. The last CBA the owners won. And now we will see how much love the Vets get when the next CBA is signed. If baseball keeps trending towards tanking, not signing players because u don’t want to win or just want to put the money in ownerships pockets will the team is a mess plus other issues then is Clark ready to fight? Does he have the balls to threaten a strike? That’s the only way to get what you want from 30+ multi billionaire owners or companies who own teams. They don’t lose easily hence their power and wealth.
Time for a salary floor and penalties for tanking, poor management (Mets, Baltimore come to mind) and rewarding teams for winning and not filling the pockets of teams getting luxery tax $ and getting creative to not really use it to contend.
Their is no reason why at min 50% of teams should be thinking they have a chance a playoffs. No reason!!!!! I don’t want the MLB to turn into the NBA with super teams and recklace spending on bad character players. NBA is competitive sometimes not all the time and it’s obvious players don’t give 100%. But the NBA used to be great!!! Now I get sad watching athletes with no skills. But, baseball has the minors so their is hope. But, tanking has to go and go soon. A salary floor should be 1 of the top 2-3 topics being worked on now
iverbure
You don’t want Mlb to turn into nba? Don’t they have a salary cap and floor?
davidcoonce74
Yes, and check out that competitive balance! Can you imagine a league with the same two teams making the finals four straight years? Never happen with the “competitive balance” provided by a salary cap, right?
Chris Giarraputo
I meant in regards to tanking and giving out huge contracts to very young players and wondering why they stop improving once they get a 5 year $150mil contract. And basketball is so boring now. The minirs which in NBA for decades was 3-4 years college ball and players leave once they can get paid by being high draft pick while not being ready and developed for the NBA game. NBA game is stale and I can’t imagine have the same allure as it did 15 years ago. Football too has changed. And I think for the worse besides head injuries. Baseball is at a crossroad. I believe the next CBA will start the game I’m a great direction or a bad 1. No In between
realgone2
Wow. I’d be pissed if I was a young player.
stansfield123
So the players are happy with the current CBA, and the fact that the average payroll WENT DOWN in 2018, while revenues continue to rise?
Cool. Looking forward to more of the same.
hiflyer000
I’m stunned by this. Clark is completely incompetent and let the owners hand him his lunch in the last CBA battle. I don’t know why incompetence is always so rewarded in this country.
lowtalker1
He is the problem
bobtillman
Like any union, the MLBPPA has become infested with management sympathizers. Marvin Miller must be flipping in his grave watching player compensation decrease as revenues/profits increase. The new Fox deal, the new MGM deal….all this while half the teams “tank” and, MOST INCOMPREHENSIBLY, get their fan bases to agree with it. It smacks of the day when you were required to “tip” the executioner before he chopped your head off.
I had some hope that the new CBA would flatten the landscape a bit, but now I’m not too sure.
lowtalker1
= more ticket prices
stansfield123
Prices are determined by supply and demand, not by how the revenues are shared within the seller’s organization.
If the players worked for free, the price of your tickets would be EXACTLY THE SAME.
Kayrall
This will not end well.
rivera42
… for the players. The owners have to be thrilled about this.
Kayrall
For everyone. Similar to socialism, eventually people wise up to the ravages of poor decisions and a period of chaos ensues.
Vizionaire
only unintelligent people bring politics into baseball talk.
xabial
Kayrall’s one of the funniest, wittiest and most intelligent posters here. honestly, one my faves
I may be hated by everyone but still allowed to have favorites Lol. Longtime fan here, Kayrall!
stansfield123
Re vizionaire:
Only deeply unintelligent people could possibly think that an election isn’t a political process.
rivera42
Wait–why are you hated by everyone?
xabial
Cuz I post a lot, usually first in threads.
For some reason, posting a lot here , especially first in threads, triggers people. Yesterday’s MGM deal thread was a prime example..
Removing posts is a delicate subject here (unless you bring up divisive race, and/or political topics) so tend to take a lot of harassment… Off topic, personal attacks getting nastier and nastier… that usually stick, unless Jeff throws me a bone.
rivera42
Eh? Don’t these people know that this is the Internet? Unless you’re trolling, what’s the big deal? Posting a lot/first to post is getting under people’s skin? Geez.
Keep your head up, X. What does your usename stand for, btw?
Kayrall
I’m not sure if you were around during that period, but I have a feeling that people are still quite jaded from the golden era of Bigpapi4evr.
Vizionaire
maybe, the players wanted clarck to correct the past mistakes?
Codeeg
I don’t even care about the CBA, it’d be nice if he could find a way to get minor league players more pay.
Chris Giarraputo
I totally agree with you. Especially now that teams are openly (dirty secret) keeping players in Minirs to gain more team control and these players have families to support.
pjmcnu
Agree re: minors pay. There is no reason they can’t be paid a living wage. I mean, did ownership REALLY need to get Congress to tuck a provision in the recent tax cut law that exempts teams from paying minor leaguers MINIMUM WAGE? Seriously? Multi-billion dollar business and you can’t pay guys minimum wage? Unconscionable.
xabial
Tony Clark is a champ. Scapegoat champion.
All 30 teams can spend up to 206M w/o penalty whatsoever. Hope he wins grievance filed against those 4 teams, especially “Spend nutting, get nutting” Bob Nutting,
Chris Giarraputo
I would think an attorney with experience in mitigation, contracts, negotiations….ect would be a better option. Of course they are on staff but, Clark seems too nice and I would not want an EX employee of my job (league) negotiationing for me. I assume he gets a salary and has some power even just Show power. The players need someone Imo who never played to Run the union with ex players as assistants and consultants. Fehr wasn’t an ex player and I think he did a good job running union. Clark is too close to the teams and executives. You have to give to get but, he doesn’t seem to have a long term plan. You need to think 10+ years down the line as this next CBA can improve or really hurt the league. And shift rules need to be put in place. More shifts have been making players want to hit HR’s since their are no fielders in the seats. I miss base hits and action. And the game is losing young fans.
carausda
The new Lead Negotiator, Bruce Meyer, is the key to the negotiations for the players in the new CBA. Check the link at the end of the article. Apparently he is the go to guy for player negotiations across several of the major sports.
Altanta Barves
This move makes MLB very happy. The players are going to get pwned.
Dock_Elvis
Atleast these union guys dont have to be walking a hotel picket line and watch other union workers cross it.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
…………………………………………………why?
pjmcnu
The most basic need is to modify the team control rules. The excuse for team control was that it provided cost certainty for developing players, because those whose talent & staying power got them to free agency after 6 years were getting the big bucks. The new view that anyone over 30 is over the hill (or very soon to become so) combined with game-playing with service time to turn 6 years into 7 has allowed teams to have team control over the entire “prime” (as newly defined) of all but those players who debut at a very young age. In essence, if debut at age 23 or older, you are under team control until you’re 30, then declared “too old” for a large or long contract. If analytics truly says this, and is correct, then control years needs to be addressed or an equitable split between ownership and players will continue to tilt more & more heavily towards ownership, and labor unrest will occur.
OverUnderDone
Honestly sounds like you have a better grasp of the problem than Tony C.
jd396
Manfred and Clark deserve each other.
OverUnderDone
I don’t know what the solution is to the union getting completely worked in the last negotiation, but it definitely ain’t supporting the guy who was in charge.
I’ve been very sympathetic to the players’ cause until now, but if they’re not going to help themselves, so be it.