The qualifying offer value for the upcoming offseason has been set at $17.9MM, reports Joel Sherman of the New York Post (via Twitter). That value, which is determined by taking the average of the game’s 125 highest-paid players, represents a $500K increase from last offseason’s mark of $17.4MM.
Any team wishing to receive draft compensation for the loss of a free agent will first have to make that free agent a one-year offer worth that $17.9MM value. Qualifying offer recipients will have 10 days to decide whether to accept or reject the offer and are free to talk with other clubs during that window as they get an early sense of their market value. If a player accepts, he is considered signed for the 2019 season at that rate. Like other free-agent signings, that player would be ineligible to be traded, without his consent, prior to June 15 of the following season.
Only players who spent the entire 2018 season with the same organization are eligible to receive a qualifying offer; midseason trade acquisitions and signings cannot receive one. Additionally, the 2017-21 collective bargaining agreement also added the stipulation that players can only receive one qualifying offer in their career. That distinction primarily impacts Nelson Cruz, as the rest of the players who have received previous qualifying offers have either already been traded (e.g. Daniel Murphy) or haven’t performed well enough to be a candidate for a second qualifying offer anyhow (e.g. Neil Walker). Cruz would quite likely have been a candidate to receive a second qualifying offer, but the new CBA makes that impossible.
MLBTR’s Mark Polishuk took a recent look at the upcoming free-agent class, writing that Bryce Harper, Clayton Kershaw (if/when he exercises his opt-out clause), A.J. Pollock, Craig Kimbrel, Patrick Corbin, Dallas Keuchel and Yasmani Grandal can be considered among the locks to receive a qualifying offer (I’d agree with all of those and add Charlie Morton to that bucket as well). Mark also took an in-depth look at a number of borderline cases throughout the league.
Draft compensation under the new system is more complicated than it was under the 2012-16 CBA, as both luxury tax spending and revenue sharing are now factored in to determine the specific penalty and compensation associated with qualified free agents. Each team’s top overall draft pick is protected, but teams with multiple first-round picks can lose their late first-rounders in some cases. Here’s a crash course/reminder.
For teams that signs a qualified free agent…
- A team that received revenue sharing the previous season will forfeit its third-highest selection upon. Signing a second qualified would result in the loss of that team’s fourth-highest selection. Signing a third would result in the loss of its fifth-highest selection.
- A team that did not receive revenue sharing and also did not pay any luxury tax penalties would lose its second-highest selection as well as $500K of the league’s allotted international bonus pool. Signing additional qualified free agents would result in forfeiting the third-highest selection and another $500K of international allotments.
- A team that paid luxury tax penalties must forfeit both its second- and fifth-highest selections in the 2019 draft and forfeit $1MM of international funds. Signing a second would result in the loss of that team’s third- and sixth-highest picks, plus another $1MM in international funds.
For teams who lose qualified free agents…
- A draft pick after Competitive Balance Round B will be awarded if the team losing the free agent did not receive revenue sharing or if the free agent in question signed a contract worth less than $50MM in guaranteed money.
- A draft pick after Round 1 will be awarded if the team losing the free agent received revenue sharing and the free agent in question signed for more than $50MM.
- A draft pick after Round 4 will be awarded if the team losing the free agent paid luxury tax penalties in the preceding season.
eduardoaraisa98
I’m still waiting for the day when teams will be able trade their draft picks.
No Soup For Yu!
I don’t think the qualifying offer has decreased in value since its inception and with the mega contracts many expect to be signed this offseason that doesn’t seem likely to change any time soon. I do wonder what year the qualifying offer we’ll finally decrease because it’s starting to get a lot more tempting for some of these borderline players.
mike156
Another example of the remarkably poor negotiating the union did with the last CBA. All that focus on this issue, and in some respects, this might even be worse for the players.
Slevin
SALARY CAP
Cam
Why?
retire21
NFL
NHL
Slevin
Rays, Reds, Royals, Pirates, etc.
jdgoat
I’d like a salary cap because it should bring out more parity. But I also want the players to get the money instead of the owners.
bronxbombers
Salary floor is more like it no tanking teams
davidcoonce74
Parity? The NFL? New England has won the Super Bowl what? 5 times in ten years? And an NFL team went 0-16 last year…meanwhile, in the NBA, that salary cap has led to the wonderful parity that is the same two teams meeting in the finals three years in a row. While in MLB 8(?) different teams have played I. The last five WS.
jdgoat
I know, but I feel like it’s a lot of apples and oranges when comparing leagues. If anything, the NHL probably would line up the most with the MLb since all contracts are guaranteed and they have good parity.
My problem with the so called “parity” in the MLB is that it’s pretty much always the same teams in the postseason. LA, Chicago, Boston, New York. Almost every single year. They have great teams, don’t get me wrong. But they also have so many large contracts that would cripple the average MLB team. I just think something should be done to level the playing field when it comes to handing out awful contracts. This could be impossible to anyways
Slevin
Guys like David will always regurgitate the Patriots/Warriors narrative, without seeing or admitting the level playing field. NFL teams have the same money to spend on their product every year, and that can’t ever be said for baseball. An NFL team can turn their fortunes around in one year vs MLB teams that wait years.
xabial
NHL salary cap is criminal. It’s so stupid low. Perfect for 4th most populated US sport. Guaranteed NHL contracts mean nothing, when the cap is a hard cap. that is so low.
2018 NFL salary cap is $177.2 million, 5th straight year up $10M+. NFL system works.
If u read my post below, 89% 2018 is 157.7M
Now let’s compare that to the NHL:
2018 NHL cap went up 4.5M to 79.5M… Several NFL players make more guaranteed money than entire NHL cap.
Despite guaranteed NHL contracts, NHL compensation is a joke compared to their peers. Their hard cap goes against everythong baseball, and “guaranteed” in name only. Give me non-guaranteed NFL contracts, with “soft” NFL cap, Than a “hard” NHL cap
davidcoonce74
Yeah, Cleveland and the Chargers have been great at turning their fortunes around. If the playing field is so level, why do the Patriots win every year? How is it possible that a team went 0-16 last year? And how is it possible that the MLB team with the lowest payroll in the league made the postseason this year?
davidcoonce74
Aslo, salary caps just put more money into the pockets of billionaire owners. I have never quite understood fans who side with billionaires over the people who do the actual work, especially guys whose careers are generally over by their early 30s.
davidcoonce74
Last five seasons, teams in the finals (World Series, Super Bowl, NBA Finals, Stanley Cup)
NFL: Patriots, Eagles, Falcons, Broncos, Panthers, Seahawks, 49ers, Ravens (8 teams)
NBA:: Golden State, Cleveland, San Antonio, Miami (4 teams)
NHL: Washington, Pittsburgh, Vegas, Nashville, San Jose, Chicago, San Jose, NY Rangers (7 teams)
MLB: Houston, LA, Cubs, Cleveland, KC, NYM, SF, St.L, Boston. (9 teams). The only team that has been in two World Series in the last five years is one of the lowest-payroll teams in baseball (Royals).
So explain to me, in detail, how a salary cap does anything except put more money into the pockets of owners?
Steven Chinwood
lofl
crisowen
agree
xabial
@retire 21
NFL and NHL are the complete antitheses of each other, when it comes to salary caps. Im in love w/ NFL system: All teams are required to spend 89 percent of cap over a four year period. You can be under the cap one year, as long as you spend 89% over 4 years.
The last 4 year period was 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. This means the team must spend 89% by 2017.
The penalty for not reaching the 89 percent spend requirement over the 4 year period isn’t bad. A team will have to give the money they’re short to their own players.
xabial
Note: Responding to myself to not make post long. Don’t be a douche.
No firesales. Don’t like it, too cheap or cant afford? U not good enough to own an NFL team. Wish they had this for “Spend Nutting, get Nutting” Nutting (only Pirates’ fans defend) Bruce Sherman, majority owner of Marlins, and the Wilpons Lmao
retire21
Xabial, it’s all good brother. Yes I completely understand all of that. Folks who point to the NFL’s Patriots and say that their success proves that there is no parity due to the salary cap are sadly mistaken. The reverse-order draft and salary cap ensures the OPPORTUNITY for success across franchises. But if you’re incompetent in drafting and FA then nothing will save your team. An NFL team cannot simply buy everyone.
Also, playing only one-tenth of the games as MLB allows wild swings in W-L thereby exacerbating the perceived disparity.
davidcoonce74
Yes, I’m in love with a system in which one team wins 5 Super Bowls in like ten years while another team doesn’t win a game in two seasons. That’s parity!
phantomofdb
David, not sure why everyone is voting down your comments about this other than being NFL fanboys. For about 17 years now, MLB Parity has been better than NFL. This year’s AL playoffs are a disappointment since it’s now the same 4 teams as last year, but the NL is a whole different ballgame. Most recent world series winner in the NL won in 1995. 2 teams left that have never won it
PopeMarley
Yet the NFL and NBA dwarf MLB in popularity..bruh
PopeMarley
Parity Schmarity..
davidcoonce74
Um, you know that baseball is the second most popular sport in America, right? By TV ratings, attendance, public polling – anything you want to use.
brewpackbuckbadg
So if a team wanted to circumvent the return a team got could they sign a player to a $49 million deal for x years and then a huge player option for x more years? Thus the players original team would get lower draft pick compensation.
Codeeg
I think they include the option years and go by AAV
Codeeg
Errrr they include the options tho
jbigz12
Even if they didn’t include the option that’d only work for players making somewhere not too far over the 50MM mark. These guys probably want to receive the money they’re paid every year. Not take 49MM for the first 5 and then get 100 in the year. At least, their financial advisors wouldn’t like that very much.
CJCue
Grandal and Pollac Locks for a 17+mill offer? There is something wrong with baseball if these guys are considered locks for that money
No Soup For Yu!
Pollock wasn’t great this year sure, but Grandal was one of the best catchers in baseball. Realmuto was the only one who was definitely better. Why shouldn’t Grandal get a QO?
Chris
I think $18 million for a good but not great catcher is a little much. Hell has any catcher ever made that much period? Same for Pollack. He’s shown to be an all around good player, but is he worth that much? I guess the benefit really is the draft compensation received of a player turns it down and signs a large contract elsewhere.
davidcoonce74
I think the more important question is “is a catcher worth that?” Catchers who are even decent are really rare; it’s the hardest position on the field and catchers have generally short careers. Yadi Molina, btw, makes more than 18 million, but I believe he’s the only catcher who does, depending on how you feel about Joe Mauer (he was a catcher when he got his contract but hasn’t been one in years).
merizobeach
Chris:
Yes, Mauer has made $23M/year since 2011, signed as a catcher and played there primarily until 2014; Posey got $20M and $21M the two previous seasons and $22M this year–and will for the next three as well.
tharrie0820
Why was I thinking the QO was like 18.4 last year?
astros_fan_84
This is needlessly complicated.