Though he has made it a policy this season not to discuss his forthcoming trip onto the open market, Nationals outfielder Bryce Harper sat down recently for an interesting chat with Barry Svrluga of the Washington Post. With the clock ticking on the 2018 season, and perhaps also his time with the D.C. organization, Harper struck a distinctly nostalgic tone with the veteran WaPo reporter.
Harper certainly does not sound eager to set out in search of a new organization — which isn’t to say he has ruled out that possibility. “I think about other cities,” the 25-year-old tells Svrluga, “but I love it here.” (Emphasis in original.)
Over the course of a 30-minute interview, Harper talked of coming of age in the nation’s capital and left little doubt that he’d be comfortable staying in his adopted home. Credit Svluga for finding a new angle in the Harper free agency saga, highlighting Harper’s vulnerability in a way rarely seen from the usually-poker-faced slugger. Svrluga presents Harper as a “homebody,” content most evenings kicking back with his wife.
If there’s uncertainty, Harper seemed to suggest over the course of the chat, it resides less in his heart than in the Nationals organization’s roster schematics. “I would love to play next to Robles or Soto or Eaton. I’d love to,” Harper said of his current outfield mates (and collective potential replacements). “But am I in those plans? I have no idea.”
Of course, the Nationals front office hasn’t exactly been shy in its own courtship, so there’s perhaps a bit of gamesmanship afoot here as well. President of baseball operations Mike Rizzo elected not to trade Harper even as the organization moved other key veterans. Perhaps the organization recognized that, as Harper emphasized to Svrluga, D.C. is all that he knows as a ballplayer. More recently, Rizzo created some waves by (according to the interpretation of some) hinting at a possible new deal with Harper. That was and is a questionable read of his comments, but Rizzo didn’t leave much doubt as to the club’s preferences, saying: “We love Harp. I love him personally and professionally and of course we’d love to see him here long term.”
This certainly must be a bizarre time for Harper as he plays out the string of the 2018 season alongside teenage phenom Juan Soto and consensus top prospect Victor Robles, Harper may be cementing his legacy as the centerpiece of the MLB’s most enticing future outfield trio – or he may be playing alongside his eventual replacements.
This season has largely been seen as a disappointment for Harper. Even as he won the Home Run Derby in front of his home fans, talk focused on free agency and his (at the time) shockingly-low .214 batting average. The Nationals, meanwhile, were barely keeping their heads above water, hanging around the .500 mark en route to underperforming relative to their Pythagorean W-L by eight wins. The Nats never did find the next gear, missing the playoffs for just the third time in Harper’s Washington tenure.
Offensively, Harper’s overall numbers have bounced back, but it’s been a curious season for the superstar. He received semi-regular playing time in centerfield for the first time since his rookie season, but his defensive ratings cratered (-25 DRS, -13 UZR). He’ll finish near his career low in BA (.243 in 2016), but he’s played in a career-high 154 games and has more than 30 doubles and 30 home runs for just the second time in his career. He leads the league in unintentional walks, and tonight he joined Jose Ramirez as the only players in the majors with 100 walks, 100 runs, and 100 RBIs (surprisingly, his first time driving in over 100 runs). Overall, Harper has hit .245/.390/.495 with a 134 wRC+ – hardly the markers of a “disappointment,” though also not the monster platform campaign that might have been hoped for.
Though the truly astronomical salary levels some envisioned may no longer be possible, Harper will still earn a truckload of money. That, too, is an obvious factor — particularly given that the Nationals seem to be set up as well as could be hoped to deal with his possible departure. Of course, the Nats have worked out the money on big-name players in the past with Scott Boras, Harper’s high-profile agent. The remainder of the market remains unclear. Many of the highest-payroll teams don’t have an obvious need for him, while teams with limited payrolls will be hard-pressed to afford him. Of course, Harper is also a talented enough player that organizations will be willing to move other pieces to make way.
All told, these recent comments hardly tell us how things will play out, though they do offer some interesting insight into Harper’s current thinking. And they function as a worthwhile reminder that Harper’s looming decision will not only significantly alter the landscape of the league, but will also chart his own future as a player and a person.
baseball1600
He may want to stay in DC but I think it’s best the Nationals stay away unless they get a discount.
baseball1600
That being said I think if he doesn’t stay in DC there’s a pretty good chance he stays in the NL. I think it’s come down to the Phillies, Cubs, Braves, Dodgers, Giants, and Yankees.
thegreatcerealfamine
Giants..he wouldn’t go to a team on the downside.
Dodgers..too many outfielders.
Cubs..no need, plus they have Heyward
Yankees..no room thanks to Stanton(Boo)
Braves..won’t pay the asking price.
Phillies..best chance
Kolukonu
Eh. Yanks could find room for him. Gardner is entering the final season of his contract (assuming his option year is picked up). He can either be traded, or the option declined for next season.
They could go with an outfield alignment of Harper/Stanton in LF, Hicks CF, Judge in RF, while rotating Harper/Stanton/Judge through DH to keep them fresh. If they wanted him, it’s entirely possible it could happen. In my opinion, he would be the better upgrade for the team over Manny, considering how well Didi and Andujar played this season.
baseball1600
All the Yankees would need to do is not resign Hicks, drop Gardner’s option, and trade Clint Frazier for a SP to make room for Harper. It wouldn’t be too difficult. Also think if the Giants outbid a team by at least 10-15 M that Harper would join. With Harper, the giants could be back in contention soon.
baseball1600
But as a Giants fan I don’t think it’s realistic. I think Philly, NY, or LA are the most realistic with the Cubs and Giants as the dark horses of the sweepstakes.
Kolukonu
I don’t see them failing to re-sign Hicks after the season Hicks put up. I think it’s more likely Gardy and Frazier get dealt if they sign Harper, though.
Solaris601
I disagree. SF has too many holes and starters in decline. Giants would be foolish to even make Harper an offer. The new GM has too much roster work to do, and going all in with the existing core is unwise.
callingoutdummies247
So you don’t resign Hicks. You put Harper in CF? Or Elsbury if he isn’t relegated to corner OF or DH. Then you trade Frazier for a SP when you have plenty to choose from to sign without giving anything up except money. You sir are no Theo Epstein
dust44
Absolutely room for him with the Cubs and Yankees. Harper can play LEFT for both teams. Stanton, Judge and Harper can rotate between LF, RF and DH. They can trade Frazier (even tho that’s selling low), Hicks or decline Gardner’s option. And the Cubs can trade Schwarber to a AL team where he needs to go to DH anyway. Or flip Almora or Happ for a starter or closer. They need both. And for the record Jason Heyward is not even close to a good reason to not get Harper if u can. That’s laughable. The Braves also def would pay up for Harper.
Knowthemarket
You didn’t really think to hard about this.
Giants. I agree. They need to take it all down and they probably already see that now.
Dodgers. You think they wouldn’t make room in the outfield for someone like Bryce Harper?
Yankees. Ditto
Braves. Probably right.
Phillies. Maybe. They have the budget and the room.
thegreatcerealfamine
@kolukonu.. The #1 need for the Yanks and pitching, and if they spend the majority will go to that. Their payroll isn’t that far under the threshold to accommodate Harpers asking price plus pitching costs. They are still on the hook for Ellsbury.
@baseball1600…Stanton saw the state the Giants were in, and declined a trade to them. Harper has been in the league for quite awhile, and probably wants to go to a team he can win now. Oh the Phillies can match or better anybody’s offer this winter.
@callingoutdummies247…never claimed to be Theo, but you certainly made ridiculous scenarios without knowing anything about the Yanks.
@dust44..the Braves would never spend like that. Yanks have Ellbury’s salary along with Stanton’s hampering them. Cubs biggest need is BP.
@Knowthemarket..Yankees need pitching 100% more than another outfielder, you might want to look at their needs. Dodgers have Kershaw to retain. You obviously didn’t think about the Dodgers, and Yankees needs.
bigjonliljon
Cubscwould move Heyward to CF for him. CF was the original plan when they signed him anyway.
Slevin
Hey ward is not a CF.
southbeachbully
First off, Harper is not best suited as a CF. The metrics prove that and most of his innings are logged in RF. Secondly, Hicks is one of the best defensive CFers in the game and he’s having a great year with power and his ability to draw a walk. Lastly, Harper is a FA this year and Hicks is one the year after. Would not make sense to trade him or non-tender him.
Harper can play LF or give 1B a shot (I would rather they give Voit a shot for 2019). Yanks can simply keep Judge in RF, Hicks in CF and have Stanton and Harper rotate from LF/DH. Yanks will hopefully decline Gardner’s option and offer a 2 or 3 year deal around $5-$7 mil per year range.
I like Frazier but we can’t assume we can count on him in 2019.
ericm25
would like for Harper to come to philly but it’s not going to happen. who the f wants to play for dumbass kapler. seriously??
azelch99
Those teams are all likely landing spots for Harper. But I wouldn’t count out the Cardinals. They need a good lefhanded bat and they have the money to spend. They also showed last year that they were willing to spend big money by trying to get Stanton.
Phanatic 2022
Cardinals need to get rid of Fowler and/or Martinez first. They also have O’Neil
MrMet33
Giants are looking at a long and painful rebuild and are currently already at the Luxury Tax threshold. Cross them off the list. Don’t be surprised to see a team like Arizona (close to his hometown Vegas) make some noise. Philly is obvious. Dodgers haven’t given out any large contracts with this ownership regime above Jensen’s 5/80.
thegreatcerealfamine
Giants fans don’t want to deal with reality…
wiggysf
Not all of us. There are plenty of Giants fans who think a rebuild is an excellent idea. However the front office seems to not like logic. We’ll see if that continues under whoever replaces Evans.
Slevin
Yea, a post farther up suggested if they signed Harper, Bam they’d immediately be back in contention.
southbeachbully
I’m not sure if you’re considering the fact that they simply may not be able to do a complete rebuild considering the long term contracts they have on Posey (3/$70 mil), Longoria (4/$72 mil), Cueto (3/$70 mil), Samardzija (2/$40 mil), Crawford (3/$45 mil), Belt (3/$51 mil) and Melancon (2/$28 mil). Of those 7 players they account for about $114 mil of the $186 mil 2018 payroll. That’s about 61% of their payroll. Those 7 guys totaled about 6 WAR. That’s simply awful. The best they can do is try and move what contracts they can move without eating too much of it and put rookies at positions that are open or can be made open.
Slevin
Plus their farm is bottom shelf.
mmarinersfan
I think there is a serious mutual connection here. But, if the 300+ million being rumored is actually true, I can’t see the Nationals going that far.
Solaris601
They can’t. Too many younger options with tremendous upside. Rizzo passed on too many offers for Robles to hose it up by spending a fortune to keep Harper. They have holes at 1B, 2B, and C to fill. Re-signing Harper has no impact on those vacancies except to put WAS in a position to fill them with placeholders.
hallwagner1
Uhh, Ryan Zimmerman is still at first base and plenty capable of being above average as shown by this season and last.
Samuel
Yes, that’s crazy money.
I was looking at some sorted WAR for position players on ESPN maybe 10 days ago. Harper was in the 80’s along with my other favorite overrated position player – Carlos Santana.
Those 2 guys hit HR’s and walk a lot. The establishment sports media loves them. Unfortunately, stats cannot measure a players mental toughness. It cannot measure a players instincts and baseball IQ to recognize the game situation and react in a way to help his team win each game. Both are high maintenance that have to be bucked up by their manager, coaching staff, and veteran team leaders. The Phillies made the mistake of overpaying Santana to be a mentor for their young players. Turned out the opposite.
There was a baseball expression from the turn of the 20th century until the late 60’s – “He’s got million dollar talent and a 10 cent head”. Harper is a lot like Grady Sizemore was – a world of talent that went out 100% on all plays, never learned to pick his spots, and forever got suckered by opponents.
Harper will continue to win Home Run Derby contests. Be on a real championship contender? Depends on his teammates. Like Santana he’s going to do what he does, and his teammates will have to adjust. But when Scott Boras gets him a $35-45 MM a year contract, that’ll eat up a high percentage of even a large market teams payroll making it difficult to put real winning ballplayers around him.
WAH1447
Can seen him signing a smaller contract like 3 or 4 years for say 26-32 million per year then hitting the market again in his prime and cash out big again. If he signs some mega deal he might be missing out on more money towards the end of his contract
brandons-3
His long term deal will almost certainly include an opt out at the 3 or 4 (or both) year mark.
RedRooster
If the Nats sign him then buh-bye Victor Robles.
southbeachbully
Why can’t Robles play CF? That’s where he’s played most of his minor league games. I don’t think Michael Taylor has performed well enough so that he has job security for 2019.
RedRooster
Where does Adam Eaton play then?
afsooner02
Has any player that has signed for 10 years actually lived up to that contract? (Without steroids)
Good luck to anyone that signs him for that amount and time.
Kolukonu
While true, most players that have signed a 10 year deal did not sign that deal at such a young age.
hiflew
Votto’s not done bad for the Reds thus far. But they have been unable to surround him with talent to win as well.
Solaris601
Precisely. Votto is earning that contract, but CIN is so financially hamstrung by it that they can’t afford to go out and get that difference-maker when they’re on the cusp. Despite Votto’s consistent numbers and presence, that contract is an albatross for any mid-market team.
jimmyz
Cincy is stung by Homer Bailey’s contract, not Votto’s.
southbeachbully
You might be right about his financial impact but Washington is much more capable than Cincy is.
brandons-3
A-Rod’s first contract (signed with Texas) returned good production. Go down a few years and Freeman’s eight year deal with Atlanta has been good. Scherzer’s deal with the Nats has been excellent. Cano’s hasn’t been an albatross yet.
hiflew
I have a feeling that Harper’s contract will eventually go down as the worst in baseball history IF it is over 5-6 years. I just don’t think his game will age well at all.
bobtillman
Given his defensive limitations, he needs to be in the AL…..a team like the Rays……
Now that you’ve stopped laughing, how “free” is Free Agency when the reality is that his choice will only be between 5 or 6 teams?…..
stymeedone
If his price tag was $10mm per year, very free. His “product” also influences the free market. Do you buy a Chevy or a Cadillac?
MetsYankeesRedSox
Toyota!
Slevin
Datsun
MetsYankeesRedSox
I had one … 69 wagon
Named her Dottie
Slevin
Yugo
turner9
Jeep
southbeachbully
He’s FREE to sign with whomever he wants to for whatever he feels is an acceptable price.
sheff86
I could see Harper at 1B in NY.
SoCalBrave
I could see the White Sox and/or Tigers being involved in the Harper sweepstakes.
tbone0816
Cardinals!!
dust44
Nationals will absolutely be in the race till the very end. Yes they have young dudes. But they paid a high price for a there starting staff and that’s not to let there best player walk.
That being said…. He will go to the highest bidder. As long as they can win games. He won’t go to say Cincinnati if they offer him 400 million (not that they would, that’s just an example). I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a club completely out of the blue. Angels? DBacks? who would of thought Seattle would go huge for Cano a couple years ago. Or the DBacks go big money for Grenke. Out of the handful or so usual clubs u hear, one or two of them r leaked bs to drive up the price. And one or two r really lining up the cash to pay for him. It will be fun to watch
astros_fan_84
I think many of these comments are delusional. Harper is very much a buyer beware player. Boras will ensure that he’s overpriced.
I would love to see him Houston for a fat three year deal, but I know that won’t happen.
jd396
There aren’t really enough teams with the revenue to drive bidding for Harper and Machado past $400m.
Old User Name
I don’t think they’ll get that much but it only takes two teams to get a bidding war going. Not to mention, some teams like to bid against themselves.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
The long string of playoff failures by Harper and the Nats have mirrored the similar struggles of Alexander Ovechkin and the Washington Capitals until they wont the Stanley Cup (finally) this spring.
I wonder if that might influence either Harper or the Nats (or both) thinking that despite their choke jobs each year in the playoffs that they are close to winning if they just stay the course.
That said, the Nats should just keep their money and roll with Soto and Robles and fix other holes on the roster.
Sign Grandal, not Harper.
Chris the Great
I struggle to see how Harper could survive in Philly. The fan base can and will be brutal to the $400 million man when he is hitting near the Mendoza Line in May. The boo birds will destroy his psyche. He seems extremely soft and that needs to be taken into his equation on where to play.
bravesfan
I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see him in a nationals uniform next year. In fact, I can’t see him in another uniform. Wouldn’t mind him as a braves but he will cost to much and I don’t think our fan base exactly loves him
yankeemanuno23
Harper is happy in a laid back cosmo City, but competitive atmosphere as per the WP Sverluga interview. So Nats can probably negotiate a upfront loaded 5 yr deal, to try to keep him. That allows them to pay larger deals to Soto,Turner, Robles to keep them when their contract are up(2yrs). Now, NYY & right field porch mean at least 45 HR for Harper…think legacy- HOF option like Mick, JoeD, Lou, Babe, etc. But Yanks need starting pitching BIG time. So Cash might not bite.
turner9
Call me crazy. But the Jays could use a premier bat to hit behind Vlad for the next few years, or even in front of him, getting fastballs down the pipe will lock him into 50 hrs a year at Rogers center
We can 100% afford the salary.
We need better OF production.
We still prob wouldn’t contend next year, but 2020-2025 will be promising
A fan can dream right
lettersandnumbersonly
as i yelled to him several times from the right field seats… you get one shot at retiring with a HOF career all with one team. once you leave, that chance is gone. for some players, i imagine that can carry some weight? as you get closer to retirement, it might carry more, but that choice/chance is gone if you went free agency earlier in your career. he likes DC. DC loves him. sign a 10yr 340 mill contract. his favorite player is Mantle, thats why he chose #34. 3+4. a 340 mill contract gives him that 3&4, lets him beat Stanton’s 325 mill contract. and a 34mil AAV contract will seem a bargain in 5 years when he’s still only 30. include inventives and team/player buyouts. i’d do it from both sides. too much higher and i’d wish him well, but let him go. i’d like him to stay a Nat, but I really hope they re-sign Rendon. 6 years 150 mill.
brandons-3
I wonder if Harper will be viewed as a payroll factor or an exception to the payroll for teams. (Like how the Mets and Rays broke their usual payroll rules by handing David Wright and Evan Longoria long term, nine-figure deals that were more or less market value.) Either way, I’m buyer beware with Harper. Once you’re handed a 200-300 million dollar contract, you expect him to produce with the consistency of Mike Trout. While he’s been an amazing ball player thus far, he hasn’t always preformed at his peak. That could lead to a lot of people wanting more from him after he inks his big deal.
bigjonliljon
Cubs have a good shot. He is tight with child hood friend Kris Bryant. Also, his dog is named Wrigley!!
Cat Mando
And Ohtani had several friends and connections to San Diego but signed with the Angels. Schilling has a son named Gehrig but no love for the Yankees.
Point is it will be the team with the finances are enough talent to field a sustainable winner. That also includes the ability to dip under the cap from time to time and especially stay away from the tiered surcharges.
I think you will see a lot more contracts similar to Arrieta’s. He signed for 3 years guaranteed for $75M and an opt out after 3 years but the Phillies can void the opt out by exercising a 2 year/$40M option for 2021-22 seasons paying $20M annually (option salaries may increase to $25M annually based on 2018-19 innings pitched or $30M annually based on Arrieta’s finish in 2018-19 Cy Young voting)
A $25M AAV was more than most thought he would get so imagine offering Harper or Machado something like 5 years guaranteed at $185-$200 with an opt out after season 5 that the team can void by exercising a 3 year option at $38-$45M/year with incentives based on MVP, games played, or WAR etc to up the ante even more if his performance stays high. If Manny or Harper do not opt out then there could be mutual options paying the AAV of the first 5 years plus the % difference in the league wide increase of the average salary from year one of the contract and each year of the contract years 6, 7 and 8.
This allows a team to retool sooner if needed or retain a productive player and allows the player options to sign elsewhere at about age 31.
I am not suggesting the numbers I stated being the actual numbers because not a single one of us knows what kind of contract players like Harper and Machado will get. The landscape is changing and teams know that long term contracts can cripple. Using shorter term high AAV contracts will be beneficial to clubs and players.
It may not happen with these two but shorter term and higher AAV contracts are coming soon to a stadium near you
Dutch Vander Linde
Some weird team like the Minnesota Twins or Chicago White Sox are gonna throw him a 5 year deal.
southpaw2153
Please, any team other than the Yankees. Yanks need to spend money on pitching, not this overrated stiff.
slider32
Yanks will have over 100 million to spend this winter, they could sign either Harper or Machado, Corbin, Happ, and either Robertson/ Britton, or Miller/ Allen.
MetsYankeesRedSox
Dodgers!
simschifan
San Diego. It’s close to home and they have payroll flexibility. Also they will be good soon.